quote:Originally posted by BigBuyer100: MM's are History all. It was Bound to happend, it being under .05 now. I beleive Motg might be headed to Pinks for trading. JMHO.
On January 9, MOTG was "headed to the Pinks."
IP: Logged |
I hear ya. I was passing out papers with MOTG's information to family over the holidays. I monitor an MOTG thread on another website. I have gotten friends and family to look at the stock; now if they buy or not its their decision of course.
I think there's a lot we can do to help spread the word about MOTG. But that's not the only way we can help the stock. Holding our shares, effectively decreasing the float, will help this puppy run when the volume comes in that drives it up.
GL to all longs, here's hoping for an end to dilution soon and a grrrreat pr tomorrow!
Not Looking too Shabby with Your Family These Days are we? Hmmmmm
You are the only One that I know of that would REC a Penny stock under .010 That "ALL HAVE POTENTIAL OF DELISTING" too Your Family and Friends Back Home.
Sheeesh, Now that is a BOLD staement!
IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Aldeberon: BB, welcome back!
There are a few mistakes in your comments that need to be pointed out. Yes, it is possible that MOTG has been diluting these past few weeks. But it widely known that these shares are not coming from MOTG, they are conversions from MOTG's investors. So MOTG is not getting any richer by all this.
The other thing to remember is, our CEO owns 13,000,000 common shares of this stock. He is "THE" shareholder here. That is good news, and one of the reasons I am here. He is not going to do something that is bad for the stock because he is a shareholder.
He repeats time and time again in his pr's that MOTG has never performed a reverse merger. Welch himself has said he is not considering a reverse split. I trust that whatever path he takes to get us on the Nas, it will be the best for shareholders. He listens to shareholders and usually responds to emails the same day, and usaully within minutes. He's a smart guy, and would not build all this raport just to screw us over.
GLTY, glad to see you want to get back in
Do You still feel Like You were write on this staement?
IP: Logged |
posted
What Really makes me Laugh is the Fact You and a Few people on this Board "CLAIM" that the CEO "CHEIF EXCUTIVE OFFICER of a Public Traded company" Email's you Updates to what is Going on.
BUT Out of all of you, NONE of you expected this price decline.
But Yet all of you are the One's Bashing me. LMAO
IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by osubucks30: Hate to say it but you all should of seen this coming.
By the way all the people who are saying buy at these prices do not listen!! DO NOT TRY TO CATCH A FALLING STOCK!! MOST OF THE TIME YOU WILL GET HURT!!
Don't worry about us osubucks30, we are adults and can make up our own decisions. Go to a message board of a stock you like. Thanks nonetheless.
IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by trade04: i guess bashers were right .02 coming...good prediction
When people make different predictions, one of them will always be right. I said the Steelers would win the Superbowl, my girlfriend said Seattle. Everyone can't be right. Basher's aren't always right and neither are pumpers. At least we finished at the ask. .03. Looking for a better week ahead. Maybe the 10-Q.
IP: Logged |
For the six months ended December 31, 2005, the Registrant had total gross revenues of $3,120,624 as compared with total revenues of $0 for the six months period ended December 31, 2004.
For the six months ended December 31, 2005, the Registrant had gross margin of $908,633 as compared with $16,961 for the six months period ended December 31, 2004.
During the six months ended December 31, 2005, the Registrant had net loss applicable to common shareholders of $1,361,916, as compared with $96,897 for the six months ended December 31, 2004.
The net loss for the six months ended December 31, 2005 is attributable primarily to expenses incurred as part of our acquisition efforts and activities related to locating and securing new portfolio companies.
During the six months ended December 31, 2005, expenses amounted to $2,276,806, attributable mainly to general and administrative expenses of $1,292,465, officers' salaries of $92,700, other salaries of $674,381, net interest expenses of $95,225 and preferred stock dividends of $122,035. For the six months ended December 31, 2004, expenses amounted to $113,858 consisting of general and administrative expenses of $99,858 and officers' salaries of $14,000. General and administrative expenses for the six months ended December 31, 2004 can be attributed primarily to legal and accounting fees.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
The cash and cash equivalent balance of the Registrant was $731,517 and $ (8,123) as of December 31, 2005 and December 31,2004, respectively.
The Company has incurred substantial losses through December 31, 2005. Until such time that the Company's products and services can be successfully marketed, the Company will continue to need to fulfill working capital requirements through the sale of stock and/or the issuance of debt. The inability of the Company to continue its operations as a going concern would impact the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts.
The ability of the company to continue in existence is dependent on its having sufficient financial resources to bring products and services to market for marketplace acceptance. As a result of its significant losses, negative cash flows from operations, and accumulated deficits for the periods ending December 31, 2005, there is doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern.
Management believes that its current available working capital, anticipated revenues, further planned reductions in operating expenses, and subsequent sales of stock and/or placement of debt instruments will be sufficient to meet its projected expenditures for a period of at least twelve months from December 31, 2005. )))))
posted
BTW: this quarterly showed Inmarketing assets, but no revenues. Inmarketing revenues will reflect in the current quarterly, due in mid-May.
IP: Logged |
posted
As long as the PPS can hold out, we should be in good shape. There was a lot of support in the .03's, so I think if we can stick close to what we've been trading at, the next Quarterly should finally give the naysayers some proof that Welch does intend to make this company succeed.
IP: Logged |
posted
Bigbuyer--I'm not going to go back and re-print all of your overblown negative comments. But you clearly bashed the hell out of this stock for months. And now you say you own 2 mil shares and that it's going to .15. That's the duplicity. Whatever, your credibilty is shot here.
I am in contact with AW nearly daily. I own a lot of this stock, and he knows that. I have posted many of his emails here, and I was the one to alert everyone to the increase in OS. (probably to my own financial detriment.) I don't pump and I don't lie, nor do I tell people what to do.
You are even crazier than I thought if you think I am a mechanic shop owner in texas, bubba's wife, a shrink in training, and a writer. Wow, I am a really well-rounded person.
IP: Logged |
posted
Katrina, FWIW, I enjoy reading your posts. They are well thought out and informative. I make it a point to read them. I am glad the Q finally got filed. The next quarter should be a better representation of what MOTG is really all about. CIAO.
posted
I was holding this stock for a while.. I sold luckily before it got too bad.. In general this company has potential and could easily double from here but... with so many other stocks with better possibility why hold your money here? I was thinking of buying at .03 but why? Would be lucky to double money... Since I have left MOTG I have played CLBE, XKEM, and MSEP.. just waiting for MSEP to rise like the others... This stock has potential but I dont think people should think "long term" when playing penny stocks... just my 2 cents.
-------------------- All men's gains are the fruit of venturing.
quote:Originally posted by Katrina7: I am in contact with AW nearly daily. I own a lot of this stock, and he knows that. I have posted many of his emails here, and I was the one to alert everyone to the increase in OS.
You have the nerve to talk about Credability? Lmao
IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Ragedbull777: Katrina, FWIW, I enjoy reading your posts. They are well thought out and informative. I make it a point to read them. I am glad the Q finally got filed. The next quarter should be a better representation of what MOTG is really all about. CIAO.
RB777
HOW THE BASHER WORKS WHAT HE IS DOING TO SCAM YOU on this board , POSTS WITH 10% fact. 90% suggestion.
Let others help you learn about the stock. Build rapport and a support base before initiating your Bashing routine.
Enter w/ humor and reply to all who reply to you. Use multiple ISP's, handles and aliases. Use two (2) or more aliases to simulate a discussion. Do not start with an all out slam of the stock. Build softly. Identify your foes (Longs) and the boards "guru" Use them to your advantage. Lead them do not follow their lead. Only bash until the tide/momentum turns. Let doubt carry it the rest of the way. Give the appearance of being open minded. Be bold in your statements. Write headlines in caps with catchy statements. Pour it on as your position gains momentum. Mock anyone who dissents. Use questions to create negative/critical thinking. Statements to reinforce pseudo-facts.
If the company’s history/PR's are negative constantly point to that. Compile a list of these data prior to beginning your efforts. If the price rises blame it on the hype or the PR, temporary mass reaction, the market, etc. Anything but the stock itself. If other posters share your concerns, play on that and share theirs too. Always cite low volume, even when it's not. Three or four aliases can dominate a board and wear down the longs. Bait the Longs into personal debates putting their focus/efforts on you and not the stock or facts. Introduce non-relevant issues for debate: e.g., political personalities, nuclear developments, etc. Divert their attention from facts. Promote other stocks that would-be investors can turn to instead of the one you’re Bashing. Do not fall for challenges on the "values" of what you are doing, it's a game and you are playing it with your own rules. When in doubt, clog the board with meaningless posts, making it hard for anyone to read and get anything of value. Use technical analysis as a predictor of “weakness” or a tool to sow doubt. TA can be interpreted any number of ways, so you will never be proven wrong and could gain a following of like-minded souls. Always bash board regulars whenever they make a mistake. When no mistakes are present, create a straw man argument and attack that. Bash and ridicule any analysis based on facts or fundamentals. Facts are not your friend. Bash any attempts to post positives. Refer to company defenders or board gurus as pumpers or dreamers or liars. Imply that anyone with anything positive to say is “pumping and dumping.” If possible, create one persona that is a long who is trying to get more info. Always frame questions from that persona in a “when did you stop beating your wife” manner. Try to avoid making overtly negative statements, but hint that you suspect something is afoul. Make negative statements in the guise of seeking answers, and then apologize but don’t retract when called on them. Choose non-threatening ID’s. Old people are good, so are females. People tend to defer to those, so you will be given more leeway to create doubt and uncertainty. If possible, post a sympathy-creating circumstance now and then — death in the family, accident, job loss. Have one ID be reasonable trader guy. He can make dispassionate observations which will just coincidentally be negative when needed, especially on any rallies and when any weakness appears in the stock price. Make sure he makes some positive statements when it doesn’t really matter to preserve the ID’s integrity. Have one ID be set up as a long who has now turned on the stock/company. This can take months to set up, but is worth it. Post positives which contain little substance for at least 60 days, post about being a long time holder, post about having a bunch of shares. Then one day, post that in your opinion the tide has changed,and you sold out
IP: Logged |
posted
Didn't BigBuyer100 once leave and say he was never coming back? I think that's what I remember. Could be wrong. Anyone else remember that?
IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Ragedbull777: Katrina, FWIW, I enjoy reading your posts. They are well thought out and informative. I make it a point to read them. I am glad the Q finally got filed. The next quarter should be a better representation of what MOTG is really all about. CIAO.
RB777
HOW THE BASHER WORKS WHAT HE IS DOING TO SCAM YOU on this board , POSTS WITH 10% fact. 90% suggestion.
Let others help you learn about the stock. Build rapport and a support base before initiating your Bashing routine.
Enter w/ humor and reply to all who reply to you. Use multiple ISP's, handles and aliases. Use two (2) or more aliases to simulate a discussion. Do not start with an all out slam of the stock. Build softly. Identify your foes (Longs) and the boards "guru" Use them to your advantage. Lead them do not follow their lead. Only bash until the tide/momentum turns. Let doubt carry it the rest of the way. Give the appearance of being open minded. Be bold in your statements. Write headlines in caps with catchy statements. Pour it on as your position gains momentum. Mock anyone who dissents. Use questions to create negative/critical thinking. Statements to reinforce pseudo-facts.
If the company’s history/PR's are negative constantly point to that. Compile a list of these data prior to beginning your efforts. If the price rises blame it on the hype or the PR, temporary mass reaction, the market, etc. Anything but the stock itself. If other posters share your concerns, play on that and share theirs too. Always cite low volume, even when it's not. Three or four aliases can dominate a board and wear down the longs. Bait the Longs into personal debates putting their focus/efforts on you and not the stock or facts. Introduce non-relevant issues for debate: e.g., political personalities, nuclear developments, etc. Divert their attention from facts. Promote other stocks that would-be investors can turn to instead of the one you’re Bashing. Do not fall for challenges on the "values" of what you are doing, it's a game and you are playing it with your own rules. When in doubt, clog the board with meaningless posts, making it hard for anyone to read and get anything of value. Use technical analysis as a predictor of “weakness” or a tool to sow doubt. TA can be interpreted any number of ways, so you will never be proven wrong and could gain a following of like-minded souls. Always bash board regulars whenever they make a mistake. When no mistakes are present, create a straw man argument and attack that. Bash and ridicule any analysis based on facts or fundamentals. Facts are not your friend. Bash any attempts to post positives. Refer to company defenders or board gurus as pumpers or dreamers or liars. Imply that anyone with anything positive to say is “pumping and dumping.” If possible, create one persona that is a long who is trying to get more info. Always frame questions from that persona in a “when did you stop beating your wife” manner. Try to avoid making overtly negative statements, but hint that you suspect something is afoul. Make negative statements in the guise of seeking answers, and then apologize but don’t retract when called on them. Choose non-threatening ID’s. Old people are good, so are females. People tend to defer to those, so you will be given more leeway to create doubt and uncertainty. If possible, post a sympathy-creating circumstance now and then — death in the family, accident, job loss. Have one ID be reasonable trader guy. He can make dispassionate observations which will just coincidentally be negative when needed, especially on any rallies and when any weakness appears in the stock price. Make sure he makes some positive statements when it doesn’t really matter to preserve the ID’s integrity. Have one ID be set up as a long who has now turned on the stock/company. This can take months to set up, but is worth it. Post positives which contain little substance for at least 60 days, post about being a long time holder, post about having a bunch of shares. Then one day, post that in your opinion the tide has changed,and you sold out
Wow, never have I heard a more concise conceptualization of BB's behaviors. Fantastic!
Who else are you up here BB? You must have a female handle and an old guy handle here as well, according to your self-revelation.
Oh, and if you're calling Kat a basher, you are reeeealy not paying attention my friend.
Again, just let me reiterate: WE JUST WANT YOU TO PICK A SIDE AND STICK WITH IT.
I think I can pretty much speak for the entire board when I say please stop posting here. You only bring discord and negtivity. Why don't you head on over to RB, where mudslinging/name calling is the sport de jour.
Sorry to others for the nastiness of this post, but I draw the line at being called a liar, or a basher, which is the implication of his last post. I'm not going to defend myself anymore or respond to BB's posts. I suggest the rest of you follow and maybe he will finally, as promised, leave.
IP: Logged |
posted
payup-he hasn't pissed anyone off yet, that's how. And he posts a lot, and his posts are informative and pretty neutral. Many of us followed him over on RB, so we knew what he was about.
Of course, its always a plus that he's nice to me.
IP: Logged |
posted
Katrina7, I look to those with high ratings as being someone to trust but still understanding that we are not right all the time. I tend to put more credit into their input than someone with one star. I don't see many 5 star ratings. So he must be doing something right. Some people don't let others rate them so I don't know weather to trust their input. thanks
-------------------- corn oil comes from corn, olive oil from olives, where does baby oil come from?
IP: Logged |
posted
payup-most of the people on this board are honest, sincere folks trying to either make some extra cash or make a living daytrading.
many of us have been following this stock since November or before, so we have seen it all. We also police the board pretty well, and we call out bashers and pumpers.
But the stars don't mean everything. There are several people on the board who have lower ratings, but still contribute a lot. I would urge you to also look at the number of people that have rated a person. That tells a more complete story.
(Plus I'm secretly upset that Al has one more star than me! You hear that al! no fair.)
I wouldn't trust anyone who didn't let people rate them.
IP: Logged |
quote:I wouldn't trust anyone who didn't let people rate them.
some of us can't leave our ratings on cuz when the group-grope folks register new aliases, they go after those who busted their scam(s). I turn mine on only via arrangement by PM...
You're right about "stars don't mean everything." You'll see some high ratings on folks who know very little, some on folks who "begged" and traded ratings like Halloween candy... You'll also see some very good traders with lower-than-stellar ratings simply cuz they don't candy-coat their responses.
Things to look for over time: honest, clear responses; admitting if they're wrong; general helpfulness; solid DD...lottsa good traders here
-------------------- Nashoba Holba Chepulechi Adventures in microcapitalism...
IP: Logged |
posted
Katrina7, 3 stars is better than none, 3 better. I don't care about having stars since I feel you all know more than me. I'm sure 99% are here to help eachother. This is my 1st board and if it works well, which it has for a little over a week, why go elsewhere. Hey, I'll see if I can nudge up your rating a little. Maybe someday you'll catch AL.
-------------------- corn oil comes from corn, olive oil from olives, where does baby oil come from?
IP: Logged |
posted
BuyTex said, Things to look for over time: honest, clear responses; admitting if they're wrong; general helpfulness; solid DD...lottsa good traders here.
You hit the nail on the head. And you spoke of scammers. I think someone tried to scam me after I was on here only a few days. I won't give his handle cause if I was wrong then it would be slander.
-------------------- corn oil comes from corn, olive oil from olives, where does baby oil come from?
IP: Logged |
Topic Closed
UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!
Printer-friendly view of this topic
![[Big Grin]](biggrin.gif)
![[Smile]](smile.gif)
![[Roll Eyes]](rolleyes.gif)
![[Wink]](wink.gif)
