If the company headquarters is in Vancouver, Boca Raton, La Jolla, Denver or Las Vegas. . . . RUN AWAY. There is an old saying in the record biz, where thousands of demo tapes are sent every week. . . "if we reject 100 percent of those wanting a record deal, we will be correct in our decision 99 percent of the time. . .and that ain't bad"
posted
lets see..USCA knows it has 50,000 shareholders of restricted shares. i wonder are restricted shares held in Cede & Co??? i'm thinking no but its possible. wouldn't that be the same as CMKX if not in Cede??? over 300 or even the 500 no matter what requirement to report???
-------------------- "keep your stick on the ice & your cup firmly in place"
IP: Logged |
posted
My opinion? CMKX is dead. Now we will be given shares in another company. A company that has no income, no cash flow, pays for everything in shares. In addition, we will be paid in restricted shares, so we cant do anything with them. If any of this does NOT sound familiar, then you havent been on the boards long enough. Now the news comes out that they have lost one of their "investors". Sounds to me like one of them had the brains to figure out that this is just a continuation of the CMKX scam. So, they decide to go ahead and close the deal anyway. How can they do that being short of the required cash? More shares? If you look at the history of CMKX, it doesnt matter anyway. USCA and GEMM are mostly worthless, and the restrictions havent even been lifted yet. I think when they are, they will tank down to .0001 just like CMKX, and eventually disappear. And looking to the future, I see the same for ETGMF. The valuation of the holdings has not been proven, and the numbers being bandied about are in BILLIONS and TRILLIONS !!!! Stop and think for a minute just how much is a TRILLION? If you had a trillion marbles, where would you put them? The sad thing is that we have no choice in the matter. None of these companies holds shareholder meetings where we can vote. None of them files financial reports. None of them can prove that they have anything except hot air. Most, if not all of them, are connected in one way or another with shady characters of ill repute. All that being said, can anyone TRUTHFULLY say that they would invest in a company like this? Yeah, I invested in CMKX, based on their rosy PRs and pumping. Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me!! I'm done rambling, now you can all tear it apart or take it for what it is worth as an unsubstantiated opinion. Good luck to all those who are trapped in this little show. You're gonna need it.
-------------------- If I give you bad information, please feel free to sue me. I have nothing left anyway. Ed
IP: Logged |
posted
according to the Task Force on 670.25 billion to go...lol. my guess is it will stop about 600 billion, maybe 650 billion. what they need to do is add the UC & family numbers in a separate counter, right under the fax-in counter. this will stop the UC owns 50+% nuts from yapping about a short has been proven once the number hits 300 billion or so. but then that would take some honesty on the part of UC & family, not 1 of their strong points.
Legal...for chits & giggles you should contact the Task Force & suggest this. see what their reply is. Ed is still a bone fide shareholder but i dont think he would spent the time...lol
-------------------- "keep your stick on the ice & your cup firmly in place"
IP: Logged |
posted
Wanna laugh?? Just got an email from PB66 inviting me. Guess they changed their rules on free speech. Or forgot who they banned for speaking their mind.
-------------------- If I give you bad information, please feel free to sue me. I have nothing left anyway. Ed
IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by bill1352: according to the Task Force on 670.25 billion to go...lol. my guess is it will stop about 600 billion, maybe 650 billion. what they need to do is add the UC & family numbers in a separate counter, right under the fax-in counter. this will stop the UC owns 50+% nuts from yapping about a short has been proven once the number hits 300 billion or so. but then that would take some honesty on the part of UC & family, not 1 of their strong points.
Legal...for chits & giggles you should contact the Task Force & suggest this. see what their reply is. Ed is still a bone fide shareholder but i dont think he would spent the time...lol
600 billion? You really think they'll get that high? I'm going with 350 billion tops. Then they can extend the deadline and distribution for 3 months or so and maybe they'll hit 400 billion. Then another extension and so on. They'll never reach the 700+ billion and I'm guessing they'll never distribute the Entourage shares either.
IP: Logged |
posted
Correct on all of the above. Ed you couldn't have put it any more simple for all the cmkx morons to understand. The only way to have made some small cash off cmkx would be a regular over night pop play. .0001 to .0002. I did this on paper back a few months and would of made a profit... but this would have been not paying any attention to the company or pr's, just blind trades on movement. The real way to last as a trader is money management and keeping your risk of lost very small, say 5% or less per trade. AND get out even with a small profit or loss ... something that koolaid seems to blunt considerably when addicted. I've noticed legal's not on every page anymore, this may be a sign of the phase out/weaning of koolaiddom. Perhaps.
-------------------- Eagles may soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines....
IP: Logged |
posted
Actually stockster my failure to post is a sign of days of DD and research. Much going on behind the scenes. I don't think you will have to wait long to see results.
IP: Logged |
posted
Ya they need to work out those 5-9 trillion dollar valuation theory behind closed doors so people won't laugh at it this time. The problem is they will still laugh at it.
-------------------- Invest with your brain not with your heart.
IP: Logged |
My Question is why? If the company had wasted everything and duped us all took the money why file a form 15/A and start this whole process. If the company had to file the form 15/A because the SEC said so, why go to the hearing and not just avoid the whole situation like many other companies have done in the past, and just get revoked. then disappear into the night? Why fight it? Once the judge ruled to revoke the stock, why didn't they just throw up their hands "we tried" and scamper off? Why request an appeal of the judges initial decision casting more light on the company if there were mis dealings or shady conduct? Why request that the appeal be withdrawn if your concerned with future accusations of breach of fiduciary duty to shareholders? Why issue a dividend to the shareholders of your now revoked stock at what appears to be (on the surface) a ridiculous ratio (by supposition) Why require that all shareholders demand physical delivery of their certificates in a now revoked stock in order to participate in the issuance of ETGMF "any other assets of CMKM available for distribution." Why did the company say,"The Task Force has been given full and complete authority to use all means necessary, including bringing federal or state court legal action, to make certain all bona fide CMKM stockholders receive their proportionate allocation of the Entourage common stock and any other assets of CMKM available for distribution." Why did the company use this wording in their last PR, "At the time of CMKM's revocation, CMKM had 703,518,875,000 shares of common stock validly issued and outstanding." Just before this line, "Urban Casavant, CMKM's sole officer and director, has informed the distribution Task Force that neither he nor his immediate family members will receive any of the Entourage shares in the distribution" Why did They include this? "Management. As CMKM is effectively a non-operational company holding only the Entourage shares and intangible assets," Why in the Q/A with Mr Frizzell did Bill quote Stoeklein in saying the company had no other assets than the ETGMF shares? was it because it doesn't? or was it because the "intangible assets" are in fact not the companies but ours? Is that why the company considers them intangible? If so Why? Why would the company go thru all of the extra steps they have if there was nothing, no point to prove, no assets to disperse, Why did the company hire 2 auditors for large sums of money if they were just gutting the company? Why did the company pay Stoeklein large sums of money if they were just gutting the company? Why did the company agree to pay Maheu large sums of money if they couldn't pay and they were just gutting the company? Why after not being paid would Maheu still stay around and agree to take people to court on behalf of the shareholders if need be, if they were just gutting the company? Why would Entourage mining agree to pay Carina and 025 Sask LTD to do the exploration on the claims they got from CMKX if their track record was to take money for exploration and do nothing? Why would we have no mention of the second GEMM and the rest of CIM if this was all over? why hold those back if you were going balls to the wall on the cert pull if you weren't leaving bullets in your gun for a future date? especially if you were concerned with future questions about maintaining your fiduciary duty to your stockholders, or future litigation about misdeeds? Why wouldn't they allow this dividend to be distributed electronically like all the last dividends? Why would several large brokerages be automatically be pulling certificates for all shareholders for this distribution? Why is it that the Brokers that are not pulling automatically giving people such a hard time in pulling their certificates (which is their right under NRS 78.235) Why is it that the winding up of CMKM was not put to vote by proxy? and why has the company not been called on the carpet for doing just that unless there is ownership of which we are not aware? Why is it if the company was not fully confident that this cert pull would produce irrefutable evidence of a naked short, as well as illegal trading against restricted shares would they call for this cert pull, and stipulate the company is ready to move forward with state civil and federal prosecution against wrong doers? There are many more Whys I'm sure but these are enough unanswered questions from me to lead me to believe there is truly a reason and a very good one that none of these questions are answered. Think about these points carefully, if this was to be the end game for this stock, with no more curve balls thrown on our behalf, if you were the president or his lawyer or his co-chairman and you were duping 60k investors at what point would you have disappeared, hung it up, covered your butt, stopped spending money, and enjoyed the rest of your life? :
IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by legaleagle: Actually stockster my failure to post is a sign of days of DD and research. Much going on behind the scenes. I don't think you will have to wait long to see results.
Two years of your DD and research has led us all down a long, dark corridor. Nothing you forecasted ever happened. Quite the contrary, your stock play of a lifetime has turned into a muddy quagmire of convoluted stock plays. You can post here from now until the cows come home, and I wouldn't believe a word of it. Your record is zero for zero. You have no credibility left, and neither does your boss, UC.
-------------------- If I give you bad information, please feel free to sue me. I have nothing left anyway. Ed
IP: Logged |
Joined: Jan 2005 Posts: 85 Karma: 0 [ Exalt | Smite ] Re: GNAW ON THIS « Reply #27 on Yesterday at 10:10pm »
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The theory that Mahue would not be here if it was a scam doesn't cut it. He is a problem solver. He worked for Howard Hughes in more capacities than acquiring land and business prospects. He spied for Hughes. He was involved in the Bay of Pigs. That involved the Mafia and MURDER. So saying he is all about doing good is ridiculous. He solves problems, yes, but the problems he MAY be solving MIGHT be Urbans regarding sinister activities. Just thinking.
-------------------- Invest with your brain not with your heart.
IP: Logged |
posted
WHY???....why not. UC has a cult not listening to facts. UC has a group of pumpers he doesn't need to pay. how many stocks out there can say this? a few have gone under & a small handful still think there is hope but UC as at least a thousand nuts still pumping or lets say believing in him. so why not do a fancy r/s into a stock his family bought stock in months ago. i hope they bought some of this stuff at .15, at least they will know what losing money on a stock is. it wont be .15 in 4 months but then after selling billions of shares $800K to try & keep the scam going is nothing. the cult hears 1 or 2 ppl get misinformation from a small broker & they think it means something. if 1 broker refuses to get someone certs it will be all over the net & the task force will be posting it. until that time nothing says there is a short in fact everything says there isn't. if there is a large short the major brokers will be the ones holding most of that bag, not the little guys.
-------------------- "keep your stick on the ice & your cup firmly in place"
IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by legaleagle: Why? phxgold King of Diamonds ****
Joined: Sept 2005 Posts: 772
Why? « Thread Started on Today at 10:25am »
My Question is why? If the company had wasted everything and duped us all took the money why file a form 15/A and start this whole process. If the company had to file the form 15/A because the SEC said so, why go to the hearing and not just avoid the whole situation like many other companies have done in the past, and just get revoked. then disappear into the night? Why fight it? Once the judge ruled to revoke the stock, why didn't they just throw up their hands "we tried" and scamper off? Why request an appeal of the judges initial decision casting more light on the company if there were mis dealings or shady conduct? Why request that the appeal be withdrawn if your concerned with future accusations of breach of fiduciary duty to shareholders? Why issue a dividend to the shareholders of your now revoked stock at what appears to be (on the surface) a ridiculous ratio (by supposition) Why require that all shareholders demand physical delivery of their certificates in a now revoked stock in order to participate in the issuance of ETGMF "any other assets of CMKM available for distribution." Why did the company say,"The Task Force has been given full and complete authority to use all means necessary, including bringing federal or state court legal action, to make certain all bona fide CMKM stockholders receive their proportionate allocation of the Entourage common stock and any other assets of CMKM available for distribution." Why did the company use this wording in their last PR, "At the time of CMKM's revocation, CMKM had 703,518,875,000 shares of common stock validly issued and outstanding." Just before this line, "Urban Casavant, CMKM's sole officer and director, has informed the distribution Task Force that neither he nor his immediate family members will receive any of the Entourage shares in the distribution" Why did They include this? "Management. As CMKM is effectively a non-operational company holding only the Entourage shares and intangible assets," Why in the Q/A with Mr Frizzell did Bill quote Stoeklein in saying the company had no other assets than the ETGMF shares? was it because it doesn't? or was it because the "intangible assets" are in fact not the companies but ours? Is that why the company considers them intangible? If so Why? Why would the company go thru all of the extra steps they have if there was nothing, no point to prove, no assets to disperse, Why did the company hire 2 auditors for large sums of money if they were just gutting the company? Why did the company pay Stoeklein large sums of money if they were just gutting the company? Why did the company agree to pay Maheu large sums of money if they couldn't pay and they were just gutting the company? Why after not being paid would Maheu still stay around and agree to take people to court on behalf of the shareholders if need be, if they were just gutting the company? Why would Entourage mining agree to pay Carina and 025 Sask LTD to do the exploration on the claims they got from CMKX if their track record was to take money for exploration and do nothing? Why would we have no mention of the second GEMM and the rest of CIM if this was all over? why hold those back if you were going balls to the wall on the cert pull if you weren't leaving bullets in your gun for a future date? especially if you were concerned with future questions about maintaining your fiduciary duty to your stockholders, or future litigation about misdeeds? Why wouldn't they allow this dividend to be distributed electronically like all the last dividends? Why would several large brokerages be automatically be pulling certificates for all shareholders for this distribution? Why is it that the Brokers that are not pulling automatically giving people such a hard time in pulling their certificates (which is their right under NRS 78.235) Why is it that the winding up of CMKM was not put to vote by proxy? and why has the company not been called on the carpet for doing just that unless there is ownership of which we are not aware? Why is it if the company was not fully confident that this cert pull would produce irrefutable evidence of a naked short, as well as illegal trading against restricted shares would they call for this cert pull, and stipulate the company is ready to move forward with state civil and federal prosecution against wrong doers? There are many more Whys I'm sure but these are enough unanswered questions from me to lead me to believe there is truly a reason and a very good one that none of these questions are answered. Think about these points carefully, if this was to be the end game for this stock, with no more curve balls thrown on our behalf, if you were the president or his lawyer or his co-chairman and you were duping 60k investors at what point would you have disappeared, hung it up, covered your butt, stopped spending money, and enjoyed the rest of your life? :
Handicapped or not.. you have a lot of nerve and someone needs to slap the crooked daylights out of you...
Trust funds slammed FULL Friends and insiders given free shares to dump for major profit 2-3 seasons of shareholder sponsored racecars 5375 Procyon St., Suite 101, Las Vegas, Nevada -- Phony autobody shop address on filings 2 auditors quiting after finding illegal practices and missing books/information http://www.secinfo.com/d1zrpn.zDc.c.htm#1stPage
Meanwhile no diamonds found, no Filings (after counteless posts/spams from you about "soon") and now revoked,divies all worthless
Jerk.. seriously you have no shame or brains .... go back to your christian crook traders.. everyone here is on to you and your scammer friends ... you are WORSE than Jim Baker.
IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by legaleagle: Why? phxgold King of Diamonds ****
Joined: Sept 2005 Posts: 772
Why? « Thread Started on Today at 10:25am »
My Question is why? If the company had wasted everything and duped us all took the money why file a form 15/A and start this whole process. If the company had to file the form 15/A because the SEC said so, why go to the hearing and not just avoid the whole situation like many other companies have done in the past, and just get revoked. then disappear into the night? Why fight it? Once the judge ruled to revoke the stock, why didn't they just throw up their hands "we tried" and scamper off? Why request an appeal of the judges initial decision casting more light on the company if there were mis dealings or shady conduct? Why request that the appeal be withdrawn if your concerned with future accusations of breach of fiduciary duty to shareholders? Why issue a dividend to the shareholders of your now revoked stock at what appears to be (on the surface) a ridiculous ratio (by supposition) Why require that all shareholders demand physical delivery of their certificates in a now revoked stock in order to participate in the issuance of ETGMF "any other assets of CMKM available for distribution." Why did the company say,"The Task Force has been given full and complete authority to use all means necessary, including bringing federal or state court legal action, to make certain all bona fide CMKM stockholders receive their proportionate allocation of the Entourage common stock and any other assets of CMKM available for distribution." Why did the company use this wording in their last PR, "At the time of CMKM's revocation, CMKM had 703,518,875,000 shares of common stock validly issued and outstanding." Just before this line, "Urban Casavant, CMKM's sole officer and director, has informed the distribution Task Force that neither he nor his immediate family members will receive any of the Entourage shares in the distribution" Why did They include this? "Management. As CMKM is effectively a non-operational company holding only the Entourage shares and intangible assets," Why in the Q/A with Mr Frizzell did Bill quote Stoeklein in saying the company had no other assets than the ETGMF shares? was it because it doesn't? or was it because the "intangible assets" are in fact not the companies but ours? Is that why the company considers them intangible? If so Why? Why would the company go thru all of the extra steps they have if there was nothing, no point to prove, no assets to disperse, Why did the company hire 2 auditors for large sums of money if they were just gutting the company? Why did the company pay Stoeklein large sums of money if they were just gutting the company? Why did the company agree to pay Maheu large sums of money if they couldn't pay and they were just gutting the company? Why after not being paid would Maheu still stay around and agree to take people to court on behalf of the shareholders if need be, if they were just gutting the company? Why would Entourage mining agree to pay Carina and 025 Sask LTD to do the exploration on the claims they got from CMKX if their track record was to take money for exploration and do nothing? Why would we have no mention of the second GEMM and the rest of CIM if this was all over? why hold those back if you were going balls to the wall on the cert pull if you weren't leaving bullets in your gun for a future date? especially if you were concerned with future questions about maintaining your fiduciary duty to your stockholders, or future litigation about misdeeds? Why wouldn't they allow this dividend to be distributed electronically like all the last dividends? Why would several large brokerages be automatically be pulling certificates for all shareholders for this distribution? Why is it that the Brokers that are not pulling automatically giving people such a hard time in pulling their certificates (which is their right under NRS 78.235) Why is it that the winding up of CMKM was not put to vote by proxy? and why has the company not been called on the carpet for doing just that unless there is ownership of which we are not aware? Why is it if the company was not fully confident that this cert pull would produce irrefutable evidence of a naked short, as well as illegal trading against restricted shares would they call for this cert pull, and stipulate the company is ready to move forward with state civil and federal prosecution against wrong doers? There are many more Whys I'm sure but these are enough unanswered questions from me to lead me to believe there is truly a reason and a very good one that none of these questions are answered. Think about these points carefully, if this was to be the end game for this stock, with no more curve balls thrown on our behalf, if you were the president or his lawyer or his co-chairman and you were duping 60k investors at what point would you have disappeared, hung it up, covered your butt, stopped spending money, and enjoyed the rest of your life? :
Handicapped or not.. you have a lot of nerve and someone needs to slap the crooked daylights out of you...
Trust funds slammed FULL Friends and insiders given free shares to dump for major profit 2-3 seasons of shareholder sponsored racecars 5375 Procyon St., Suite 101, Las Vegas, Nevada -- Phony autobody shop address on filings 2 auditors quiting after finding illegal practices and missing books/information http://www.secinfo.com/d1zrpn.zDc.c.htm#1stPage
Meanwhile no diamonds found, no Filings (after counteless posts/spams from you about "soon") and now revoked,divies all worthless
Jerk.. seriously you have no shame or brains .... go back to your christian crook traders.. everyone here is on to you and your scammer friends ... you are WORSE than Jim Baker.
posted
Sheesh, Why can't you guys do a reference to someone's post like -->posted November 20, 2005 19:38... instead of copy pasting complete pages of someones post thus choking bandwith, not to mention maxing out my temp internet folders. Please do the Allstocks servers and everybody else a favor and at least think about it. Thanks S5 Yea, I know.. TOTALLY off topic!
One thing Allstocks should implement is a alpha numeric record of posts within the thread. Many other boards do this, and it's easy to find individual posts.
-------------------- Eagles may soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines....
IP: Logged |
posted
CMKX's forte was diamonds. ETGMF now comes out with Uranium. Since the new scam is now in place, how come nobody has started a pump thread on ETGMF?
-------------------- If I give you bad information, please feel free to sue me. I have nothing left anyway. Ed
IP: Logged |
Topic Closed
UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!
Printer-friendly view of this topic
![[Smile]](smile.gif)
