Allstocks.com's Bulletin Board
Topic Closed  Topic Closed
Post New Topic  New Poll  
Topic Closed  Topic Closed
my profile login | register | search | faq | forum home

  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Allstocks.com's Bulletin Board » Micro Penny Stocks, Penny Stocks $0.10 & Under » CMKX - revoked but assets still to come? (Page 22)

 - UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!   This topic comprises 24 pages: 1  2  3  ...  19  20  21  22  23  24   
Author Topic: CMKX - revoked but assets still to come?
Ric
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Ric     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
After a year of reading these crazy peoples posts of a settlement and trillion dollar valuation which by the way they paid a few million dollars for, I guess their prior owners were clueless, I bet Entourage just can't wait to get these shareholders as part of there base. roflmao

--------------------
Invest with your brain not with your heart.

Posts: 4405 | From: Bristol, Tn, USA | Registered: Aug 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Monopoly Money
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Monopoly Money     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
hahahah. What failing company wouldent want this bunch as an investor base?

quote:
Originally posted by Ric:
After a year of reading these crazy peoples posts of a settlement and trillion dollar valuation which by the way they paid a few million dollars for, I guess their prior owners were clueless, I bet Entourage just can't wait to get these shareholders as part of there base. roflmao



--------------------
M.M.
Semester #3 started,Only 7 more semesters to go.
Why, in an age where information is so easy to get, cant we find information on one man.
Experience is something you dont get until just after you need it.

Posts: 1002 | From: Southaven, Mississippi, US | Registered: Nov 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
permanentjaun
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for permanentjaun     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
MM

My mistake on Total Recall. I never really paid attention to that movie. It's a fun movie, but not anything award winning. It did win an Oscar for sound, best effects, best sound effects.

Anywho, the point of my alien post was that we have to accept that there is probably an alien planet, race, etc. that had a much more interesting evolution or has a more interesting planet. I agree our planet and life are very interesting; but I feel this universe is too expansive for us to be the cream of the crop in terms of the most interesting evolution. Another thing to think about is perhaps everything in the universe evolves the same way and no one cares to learn about the same crap they've already experienced. Lol. Back to real stocks. Matt

Posts: 1504 | Registered: Sep 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Monopoly Money
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Monopoly Money     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
We'll if you want to get all philisophical in the ways of the Universe i can oblige. You do realize that we have no idea how old our galaxy is, let alone our Universe. It is possible we are the first sentient beings to populate this barren wasteland we call space. However, it is my opinion that we are one of the youngest to develop, given the proximity we are in the miliky way and the milkyway relative to other known galaxies.

We are actually on the outter skirts of the Milky way. Which means we would have been one of the solar systems that devleoped last, *theory of Gravetational Constant, along with, "the galaxy is constantly moving outward*. Given this information, thats not to say we are the newest sentient life forms either. Im baising this all on the assumption that the universe is Trillions of years old, galaxies have come and gone, contracted and expanded and were whats left over from billions of years of drifting atoms/elements collected togeather in a gravity well which finally formed what we know today.

That being said *mouthful*, the mistake known as, the human race, is not the only one in my eyes. You add up how many stars there are in the Milky way alone, then add up the average planets each solar system has, divide that by conditions neccessary to facilitate life and the chances of the neccessary materials being present at the precise time to form life. Granted this is all based on life as, we as human beings, understand it, carbon based life forms. Is it not fessible that there are other methods of life, other ways of living beyond our comprehension ta this point in time? I think so.

Anyways back to your original thing about Total Recall. I didnt mean to beat you up about it just had nothing else better to do and decided to remember what i could about the movie. My 3rd shift counterpart is here, i feel like crap so im going home. have a good night


quote:
Originally posted by permanentjaun:
MM

My mistake on Total Recall. I never really paid attention to that movie. It's a fun movie, but not anything award winning. It did win an Oscar for sound, best effects, best sound effects.

Anywho, the point of my alien post was that we have to accept that there is probably an alien planet, race, etc. that had a much more interesting evolution or has a more interesting planet. I agree our planet and life are very interesting; but I feel this universe is too expansive for us to be the cream of the crop in terms of the most interesting evolution. Another thing to think about is perhaps everything in the universe evolves the same way and no one cares to learn about the same crap they've already experienced. Lol. Back to real stocks. Matt



--------------------
M.M.
Semester #3 started,Only 7 more semesters to go.
Why, in an age where information is so easy to get, cant we find information on one man.
Experience is something you dont get until just after you need it.

Posts: 1002 | From: Southaven, Mississippi, US | Registered: Nov 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
permanentjaun
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for permanentjaun     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
It is very possible we were the first to develop, but my belief/opinion is that, that situation is improbable.

I don't agree with your theory of us being on the outskirts of our galaxy meaning we developed last. The spark of life, even of planets and solar systems, requires certain conditions to occur. The position of a solar system relevant to the "center" of a galaxy does not constitute that the conditions of creation are met or not met. Our solar system could have met the conditions necessary to create life of planets and stars well before the catalyst was sparked in the center of our galaxy.

It is also difficult for me to say we are young compared to the position of our galaxies relative to others because all points in space are moving away from each other equally. There is no center of the universe. If we're moving away from a galaxy at 10,000 km/s then that galaxy would also see us moving away from them at 10,000 km/s.

This explains it in detail -
http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Relativity/GR/centre.html

Therefore if you were to say position relative to other galaxies determines age, then everything would be of equal age. We know this can not be true since we witness the beginnings of galaxies today. That does not mean that they're not moving away from us though.

So, as I've said, it's my opinion that there is a lot of life in our universe we don't know about. With the infinite possibilities of life, considering our universe to possibly be infinite, our history of being is next to impossible as being the most interesting to visit and learn about. Wrap your head around all that for a while. Lol. Adios. Matt

Posts: 1504 | Registered: Sep 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Monopoly Money
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Monopoly Money     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
actually id like to correct you on that. *im in physics class and i asked this one* The moon orbits earth, due to the gravitational pull. So the moon goes round and round and rount until you get dizzy. The earth orbits the Sun. The earth goes around the sun over and over again, until you get dizzy. Now the sun orbits a central gavitational object in our galaxy, which it goes around and around and around *this has been proven* Now the galaxy *theoretically* all galaxies in the universe would rotate around a singular mass, which would fit the forumla up to galaxies.

and to prove to you that we are on the outskirts of the milkyway *since you dont believe me and think that is theory*

 -

according to this picture which can be found at http://www.enchantedlearning.com/subjects/astronomy/solarsystem/where.shtml it pretty much looks like were on the outskirts of our galaxy to me. And with this *FACT*, remember it try to deal only with those when i argue, we would be one of the youngest solar systems in that have developed, which in turn means we would be one of the newest planets that house life in our galaxy. This image also proves that we are rotating around a Galactic center. wether or not its a huge massed/gravity object, or the combination of a multitute of obejcts, I.E. an atom with electrons orbiting, however i cannot prove the galaxies rotate around a central mass, simply because we can't see that far out yet [Big Grin]

So here, i present to you evidence that will back my argument up that we are relatively new in our galaxy and that we are probably one of teh youngest. Now in relation to every other galaxy in the universe i have no idea how old we could be. but were at least 5 billion years old. *reference* http://solar-center.stanford.edu/FAQ/Qage.html

hope this helped a little bit

--------------------
M.M.
Semester #3 started,Only 7 more semesters to go.
Why, in an age where information is so easy to get, cant we find information on one man.
Experience is something you dont get until just after you need it.

Posts: 1002 | From: Southaven, Mississippi, US | Registered: Nov 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
legaleagle
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for legaleagle     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Post by noahltl


Negativity Def: characterized by habitual skepticism and a disagreeable tendency to deny or oppose or resist suggestions or commands

The first thing noted in the definition is that negativity is defined as "habitual" skepticism. So if you find yourself "occasionally" feeling skeptical in this stock, I think you may just be "normal" and healthy and not defined as negative. Also, I think we can put a little of the blame on the company because it is quite easy to become skeptical in the absence of facts generated from the "brass". Now we also know that secrecy is important to precious minerals exploration, and when under outside attack, I think even some disinformation and atmosphere conditioning is proper aand permissible. And the "leadership" of Bob Maheu, with his past, just screams of pulling all the stops when dealing with the enemy.

Recently we have witnessed a phalanx of habitual skeptics arise and take control of several message boards with accusations of UC being a detestable manipulator of the stock and an outright thief, worthy of spending his life behind bars, and being sued for millions, for stealing all of our investment dollars. They have ostensibly utilized dcouments procured by the SEC, for use in prosecuting its case against CMKX, to paint a picture of an evil ogre bent on lining his pockets at our expense.

As to those SEC documents (if they really were), my experience as a criminal investigator allows me to understand, that in the preparation of a case against anyone, you accumulate "evidence" that can be used by the prosecutor to "make" their case, not to harm it. And in the case of a "sting", if that is what happened here, there would be much evidence of criminal activity by the principals. That is what a "sting" is all about, participation in the criminal activity, while accumulating enough evidence to convict the "real" bad guys. At the end of a sting, the bad guys are arrested, and the "co-operators" are not. In the case of CMKX, we see associates being arrested at this time, and turning states evidence. Shawn Hackman was arrested early on and did so. Then Gary Walters was recently arrested, arraigned, pleaded guilty and is awaiting sentece, all in a scant few months. This is usually indicative of having cooperated in the investigation in exchange for a lighter sentence. Then we see John Edwards "empire" crumbling and rumors of asset seizures traveling the boards and chat rooms. Yet nothing on Urban Casavant. No prosecutions. No seizures of assets. No orders to remain "in country" Did the DOJ just miss the "evidence" that is being promoted as the "proof" of criminal activity on the part of UC? Just how far can we be led to believe in the ignorance or incompetence of our law enforcement organizations by a handful of message board hacks?

But even in the absence of "sting", let's take a good look at this "effort" by some to raise questions about UC and CMKX. This negativity can't get us to sell our shares any more, we are locked in. They can't be protecting any "newbies" from making mistakes. They can't, any longer, purchase the stock. We're locked at this point, so they can't affect the pps. What is their motivation?

It appears that there are only two possible motivations for bashing UC and CMKX at the moment. One is to prepare the masses for a class action by an attorney bent on making his millions in court, or to incite nervous investors to launch their own cause of action. The second is to create an atmosphere of desperation at ever profiting or recovering on our investment, in order to thwart the "cert pull" operation. And/or to create a climate where shareholders are willing to accept "anything", just to get out of the current situation.

Personally, I'm in for the "long haul". I expect to be compensated for the naked shorting of this stock, and I intend to follow the value of our holdings into the future in whichever "vehicle" the company decides to place its claims. And I'm not falling for the "charges" of a few well placed dissidents bent on destruction of this company for whatever their reasons or agendas may be. This is all just IMO, and I could be wrong. But I will wait until the "facts" are known be they good or bad, and not be influenced by the "bad winds" of self promoters.

Posts: 2375 | Registered: Nov 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Monopoly Money
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Monopoly Money     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Whos going to compensate you, where is that money going to come from? and furthermore whos going to pay it?

--------------------
M.M.
Semester #3 started,Only 7 more semesters to go.
Why, in an age where information is so easy to get, cant we find information on one man.
Experience is something you dont get until just after you need it.

Posts: 1002 | From: Southaven, Mississippi, US | Registered: Nov 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
legaleagle
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for legaleagle     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
From Dr. D.


Settlement? Could become a reality...
« Thread Started on Today at 11:55am »
The distribution is in certificate form so we can win.
This is a revised post I put out on 28 October 2005 the day of CMKX’s revocation being finalized and before the announcement by the company for a certificate pull. This was an expected action and option I seen for the company for some time, but now it could be reality.

CMKM Diamonds – Bona Fide shares
- Authorized Outstanding Shares? = (703,518,875,000) Company is responsible to cover - Legitimate – Bona fide shareholders – A hefty 703,518,875,000 shares qualify for distribution of Entourage and CMKX Assets to be paid by the company – We will see Direct distribution from the Task Force after share legitimacy is determined by presentation of an authorized certificate from 1st Global Transfer signed by an authorized officer of CMKX. Not one Share of the NSS position can legally be paid the asset distribution by the company. The A/S is still 800 billion through the Nevada Secretary of State and they are all accounted for in “Treasury Shares, Retired Shares, and Outstanding Shares” and this sets the limit on the total amount of “authorized, legitimate, bona fide shares” the company can cover and the TA can issue. Regardless of any rumors from shareholders that the DTCC stated that everyone will get certificates. Additionally, it would be illegal for the company/Task Force to take “legitimate bona fide shareholders” share package rights to the distribution of the Assets of CMKM Diamonds and give them to a non share holder. Stay with me please!

Counterfeit – Naked Short Shares
Non-authorized company shares – These shares are issued and owed by MM/Broker/DTCC/NSCC) - SHORTY
MM/Broker/DTCC/NSCC – Unauthorized O/S = Possibly Unknown Trillions – The Counterfeiters are responsible to cover Illegitimate counterfeit shares they sold to unsuspecting investors in CMKM Diamonds causing the existence of Naked short shareholders – Possibly unknown trillions of shares and tens of thousands of shareholders do not qualify for the company/Task Force distribution of assets but instead “qualify” for distribution of Entourage And CMKX assets to be matched and paid to them by the Counterfeiters/Shorty.- Settlement meetings to discuss the Distribution would be negotiated among Counterfeiters/Shorty as to who is responsible for how many shares and who owes what percentage of the payment to the shareholder. Equal shares and portions of CMKX distribution will have to be paid to all Electronic shares that could not receive certificates or shareholder action possibly with Task Force assistance will be taken against the brokers who purchased illegitimate/counterfeit shares and placed them in their clients account. Many brokers have hedged their position with rules in place allowing them to reverse all trades and refund purchase price and transaction fees back to a determined date on any security. But in this particular instance I don’t think SHORTY has a chance! JMHO of course.

The Company/Task Force has moved the CMKX Certificate Holders and the eventually revealed NSS position electronic holders of CMKX into a position to potentially make all CMKXers a tidy settlement by Shorty and Co. if this scenario is how Urban, Maheu, Stoecklein, and Frizzell intend to bring the market makers/Shorty to force a settlement.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The deliverance by bona fide shareholders of certificated shares of CMKX to the company for the Entourage and CMKX asset distribution can only be answered by the company by issuing certificated shares of Entourage and potentially certificated shares of past known CMKX assets (i.e. CIM, GEMM, and SGGM along with UCA and 10% CIM lifetime royalties) to be distributed to the shareholders. This payment cannot be electronically placed in a shareholders account because the distribution will follow the share. The share is in physical certificate so the distribution has to be in physical certificate.

Therefore, “Shorty”, whomever you determine that to be, that either individually or collectively owes the entire NSS position is either forced to obtain matching physical certificated shares to pay the NSS position for the CMKX bona fide shareholder certificate share distribution. Shorty will have to issue them to the remaining naked short shareholders of electronic shares that can’t get CMKX certificates or shorty defaults, forcing the insurance to kick in, exposing shorty to the market and general investing public, shorty is then brought up on charges, forced to settle and go to jail.

If they choose to settle and I believe they have little choice:

1. Shorty will have to approach Entourage and obtain the matching physical certificated shares in a private placement of some sort to get the necessary restricted shares and pay the naked short shares legitimately. If they fake Physical Certificates to pay to the Naked short position they are brought up on Federal counterfeiting charges.
(This holds true for all shares from various companies distributed to us)
2. Secondly CMKX owned 200 billion shares of SGGM. (I am guessing that we still have them) SGGM did not challenge a revocation a few months ago and therefore Shorty will have a difficult time legitimately covering these shares in certificate form. Shorty would have no choice but to get a private placement in SGGM which could net SGGM billions which could then be distributed to shareholders/us in a settlement.

3. CMKX still owned at least 20 billion shares of CIM (Casavant International Mining), Ron Casavant – president, plus a 10% lifetime royalty, all of which will be distributed to CMKX shareholders. Shorty will have equally difficult times trying to obtain these shares in certificate form and also would have to negotiate to get the NSS position an equal piece of the 10% lifetime revenues. Especially if CMKX stuck an OREO (humungous diamondiferous kimberlite pipe) or two in CIM before the transfer to Entourage. We only transferred 36% of a 60% holding we initially bought in Nevada Minerals to Entourage leaving a possible 24% of those claims that may have been placed in CIM. These monies, easily could equal billions of dollars and should be paid to shareholders/us for a lifetime.

4. this holds true for USCA/UCAD, Shane Resources, United Carina, the American Mine (now is reportedly defaulted) and any other entity or asset that CMKX has tied the knot with. Each one equally valuable and capable of yielding millions and/or billions of dollars to be equally distributed to shareholders. Remember that the distribution is in certificate form so we can win.

The certificate holders initiate the plan by removing all legitimate 703,518,875,000 outstanding shares from the TA and market permanently exposing Shorty. The certificate holders are the bona fide shareholders and account for the entire authorized and legitimate OS and verifies it in certificate form to the company.

As I said Shorty can’t cover the distribution with electronic markers or further NSS because payment has to be made in physical certificate from the company. Then enters the pressure from the counterfeit/NSS shareholders (electronic shares not covered or pulled) as Shorty cannot fake certificates without having the U.S. Secret Service, CIA, FBI, and all of the counterfeiting enforcement agencies on their back. The SEC/DTCC cannot protect them if they counterfeit a stock certificate as that is exactly like counterfeiting U.S. Currency.

We know Shorty is used to winning and rarely loses and will not be happy, but Shorty is not ignorant to the fact that Senators, governors, Attorney Generals, Representatives, Well known business men, etc… have been not only made aware of the circumstances surrounding CMKX, but some of them are shareholders. Shorty loves to win, but he doesn’t like getting worldwide exposure, going to jail, ruining the stability of the U.S. Economy, possibly bankrupting, and still having to pay up on the backend.

If I am seeing this right, then the Certificated shareholders slam the door on Shorty because the company pays out the assets and distributes Entourage in physical certificate form to the shareholders. Nothing electronic is permitted so Shorty no longer reigns supreme. The Task Force/Company has taken the game out of Shorty’s arena and has pulled him down to size where in the physical certificate world he loses. Low Tech still Rules! The electronic shareholders that couldn’t get certificates are the back breaking pressure for Shorty as he is forced to buy-in, match, settle, and pay out in CERTIFICATE Form to the company in damages and then to the naked short shareholders to fully include them in the distribution of assets or possibly go directly to jail, force insurance to kick in, possibly ruin the stability of the U.S. Economy.

This plan, if Urban chooses to use it, would therefore include all certificate shareholders (bona fide) the covering of all NSS holders (electronic – non cert and non direct registered), because Shorty has to fork over physical certificated shares by buying in to the companies he has to get them from (CMKX, Entourage, CIM, USCA/UCAD, GEMM, plus royalties). This makes all formerly illegitimate shareholders now legitimate shareholders in the distributed entities (companies) that have been included by CMKX’s distribution.

The monies generated from Shorty being forced to buy in to these companies should generate cash dividends or settlement monies from all companies to the shareholders, of which we would all legitimately be shareholders, and when the settlements are paid out, we are still holding all of our shares in Entourage, CMKX, CIM, SGGM, GEMM, etc… that we started with, and more…

IMHO, No one can even hope to guess accurately what kind of a settlement agreement would or could produce in a per/share payment to CMKXers to resolve the NSS position. Many are guessing, but in all honesty there is no way to calculate from our end of this equation. No valuation, no list of assets, no idea of debt, financials as a whole, etc... Anybody's guess is only that, "a guess". IMHO don't give any legitimacy to figures released by shareholders. If it doesn't come through the Task Force (not the Owners Group) it isn't real, IMHO.

This is just an idea I had at how things could work out. Thanks for listening. These are of course just my opinions and I ask that you treat them as such.

Success is at hand.

Dr.D

http://millionaires.********s80.com/index.cgi?board=main&action=display&thread=1133110509

Posts: 2375 | Registered: Nov 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
permanentjaun
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for permanentjaun     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
MM - I did not disagree with you that we are on the outskirts of our galaxy. My arguement is that our position in our galaxy does not mean that we are one of the newer galaxies. I also do not argue that our galaxies age of 5 billion is new. I simply argue that there are probably solar systems in similar locations in our galaxy that are older than many solar systems located near the center of the galaxy.

Also, you should reread the link I posted. It makes sense that there may not be any center of the universe. I believe this is where string theory comes into play. Galaxies light years away still have a gravitional pull on us, no matter how faint. So if there was a big bang, and galaxies expanded in the universe like dots on a balloon, they would all expand out equally with relation to one another. Their collective masses would combine to create a false center of the universe. Sorry got to go. Maybe I'll continue my thought later. Matt

Posts: 1504 | Registered: Sep 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Ric
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Ric     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Someone needs to send these links to Bellevue so they can figure out were to pick up there lost patients. I have a hard time believing this many people are this brainwashed. Guess what CIM and SSGM are gone. You will get nothing and UC ripped you off. If your lucky you might still be a to sue him before he con you into giving him enough time to get away with this. You people need serious help.

--------------------
Invest with your brain not with your heart.

Posts: 4405 | From: Bristol, Tn, USA | Registered: Aug 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Monopoly Money
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Monopoly Money     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
hmmm interesting i shall have to give this some thought.

quote:
Originally posted by permanentjaun:
MM - I did not disagree with you that we are on the outskirts of our galaxy. My arguement is that our position in our galaxy does not mean that we are one of the newer galaxies. I also do not argue that our galaxies age of 5 billion is new. I simply argue that there are probably solar systems in similar locations in our galaxy that are older than many solar systems located near the center of the galaxy.

Also, you should reread the link I posted. It makes sense that there may not be any center of the universe. I believe this is where string theory comes into play. Galaxies light years away still have a gravitional pull on us, no matter how faint. So if there was a big bang, and galaxies expanded in the universe like dots on a balloon, they would all expand out equally with relation to one another. Their collective masses would combine to create a false center of the universe. Sorry got to go. Maybe I'll continue my thought later. Matt



--------------------
M.M.
Semester #3 started,Only 7 more semesters to go.
Why, in an age where information is so easy to get, cant we find information on one man.
Experience is something you dont get until just after you need it.

Posts: 1002 | From: Southaven, Mississippi, US | Registered: Nov 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
bill1352
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for bill1352     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
"The deliverance by bona fide shareholders of certificated shares of CMKX to the company for the Entourage and CMKX asset distribution can only be answered by the company by issuing certificated shares of Entourage and potentially certificated shares of past known CMKX assets (i.e. CIM, GEMM, and SGGM along with UCA and 10% CIM lifetime royalties) to be distributed to the shareholders"


lets see add this up & it equals 73 shares of entourage per million or $14.20 per million at the current pps of .20. if they still have the GEMM shares thats another $1.50 per million. CIM???...worthless thus 10% of zero is zero. SGGM???...revoked, lots of value there but at least ya dont send them 5% of the entourage. maybe, supposedly they paid $10 million cash to UC, they just might want 5% of the entourage. that is if there is anyone running SGGM anymore. UCA???? cmkx owns zero% of UCA thus you get zero.


$16.00 per million, maybe, at the cost of at least $100 per million. if you paid more then .0001 that cost factor goes up. an 84% loss IF you can sell entourage at .20 & IF your cmkx average is .0001. i wonder was that "STOCK PLAY OF A LIFETIME (echo...echo...echo)" directed at stockholders or UC?

--------------------
"keep your stick on the ice & your cup firmly in place"

Posts: 3651 | From: Algonac, MI. 48001 | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
ed19363
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for ed19363     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
Originally posted by Ric:
Someone needs to send these links to Bellevue so they can figure out were to pick up there lost patients. I have a hard time believing this many people are this brainwashed. Guess what CIM and SSGM are gone. You will get nothing and UC ripped you off. If your lucky you might still be a to sue him before he con you into giving him enough time to get away with this. You people need serious help.

SGGM is gone. CIM never was.

--------------------
If I give you bad information, please feel free to sue me. I have nothing left anyway.
Ed

Posts: 1772 | From: Oxford, PA, USA | Registered: Oct 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
legaleagle
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for legaleagle     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
Originally posted by ed19363:
quote:
Originally posted by Ric:
Someone needs to send these links to Bellevue so they can figure out were to pick up there lost patients. I have a hard time believing this many people are this brainwashed. Guess what CIM and SSGM are gone. You will get nothing and UC ripped you off. If your lucky you might still be a to sue him before he con you into giving him enough time to get away with this. You people need serious help.

SGGM is gone. CIM never was.
ed, the fallacy in your thinking and posting, is that you simply say SGGM is gone.......it is revoked, just like CMKX, but goes on functioning as a private company, only out of reach of the manipulators now. CIM has been for a long time, and also having private status, shorty can't touch it. Personally I think it is the receptacle of the "missing assets" of CMKX and ultimately the "phoenix" that will arise from the ashes of CMKX.

It is misleading to say these companies are history when you don't know or have any proof. So at this point, my scenario is just as valid as yours and the other negs.

Posts: 2375 | Registered: Nov 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
ed19363
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for ed19363     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
Originally posted by legaleagle:
quote:
Originally posted by ed19363:
quote:
Originally posted by Ric:
Someone needs to send these links to Bellevue so they can figure out were to pick up there lost patients. I have a hard time believing this many people are this brainwashed. Guess what CIM and SSGM are gone. You will get nothing and UC ripped you off. If your lucky you might still be a to sue him before he con you into giving him enough time to get away with this. You people need serious help.

SGGM is gone. CIM never was.
ed, the fallacy in your thinking and posting, is that you simply say SGGM is gone.......it is revoked, just like CMKX, but goes on functioning as a private company, only out of reach of the manipulators now. CIM has been for a long time, and also having private status, shorty can't touch it. Personally I think it is the receptacle of the "missing assets" of CMKX and ultimately the "phoenix" that will arise from the ashes of CMKX.

It is misleading to say these companies are history when you don't know or have any proof. So at this point, my scenario is just as valid as yours and the other negs.

Okay, let me clarify the statement then, just for those of you who are too dense to get it.
CMKX and SGGM are revoked, private companies of which we have no part. We cannot vote, control what they do, nor sell the shares. Ergo, we cannot make money from them at this time. CIM, being a privately held company, has issued us stock as a dividend. However, that stock, along with USCA and whatever else we may have been given, are restricted, which again means we have no control, cannot sell shares, and therefore cannot make any money on them.
Now, legal, does this sound like a good bargain? I dont want to hear your ramblings about the future, I want to hear NOW !!!! And NOW, all of this garbage is worthless. The future is a crapshoot just like playing the lottery. But RIGHT NOW? Zilch !!!!
Any argument with this terminology??

--------------------
If I give you bad information, please feel free to sue me. I have nothing left anyway.
Ed

Posts: 1772 | From: Oxford, PA, USA | Registered: Oct 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
legaleagle
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for legaleagle     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
That all sounds "fair", but tells me you just want your money today and don't want to wait any longer. That you cannot see past what is in your account. And cannot understand that this company has the goods or it would have benn gone a long time ago. Some times making money requires patience and maturity. If you wanted a good swing trade, you should have been out at .0012
Posts: 2375 | Registered: Nov 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
netra
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for netra     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
noahtl thanks for more of the reguritated bullshyt. Last i heard you saying they were close to filing, then i heard you say the whole thing is a sting..

quick flip the wheel-o-theories to see what you can come up with this week

LOL. u clown.. now go back to Mudding 24x7

Posts: 202 | Registered: Nov 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
legaleagle
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for legaleagle     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
You'll have to find that one on "close to filing". I have never thought they were going to file. Mainly because of the "sting", they would not want to reveal how it had worked.
Posts: 2375 | Registered: Nov 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
legaleagle
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for legaleagle     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
MP3s of those "interesting" broker calls, re: cert pull. Take out the spaces.


http://www.willy wizards undergroundmp3.com/

Posts: 2375 | Registered: Nov 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
netra
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for netra     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
Originally posted by legaleagle:
MP3s of those "interesting" broker calls, re: cert pull. Take out the spaces.


http://www.willy wizards undergroundmp3.com/

http://tinyurl.com/9rqbs

Lol the response is overwhelming! Brokers don't know anything they just tell their clients regurgitated bullshyte. Its over no sting, no filings, no goods, just a nice warm scam.


Again scary how you like to talk in third person.

[Eek!]


"I assure you, it will be done" - Maheu telling the judge CMKX will file all reports.

Posts: 202 | Registered: Nov 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Bottomliner
Member


Icon 1 posted      Profile for Bottomliner     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
Originally posted by legaleagle:
From Dr. D. ... Settlement? Could become a reality...

legal
Very interesting. Can't say I believe it or not because I don't understand the process well enough (it's like animal reproduction ... I understand the mechanics, just not the science that makes it happens). [Big Grin]

--------------------
Everything I say is only my opinion ... right or wrong.

Posts: 2152 | From: Ohio | Registered: Sep 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
legaleagle
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for legaleagle     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Third Person????


Do you know what that means?


We, us.


Did you see that somewhere? If I do speak in the third person, it would refer to those who think with like minds. i.e. Kool Aid Drinkers. LOL netra, you're a trip.

Posts: 2375 | Registered: Nov 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Monopoly Money
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Monopoly Money     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Great minds think alike, *but more true to form in this instance--->* unfortunately so do stupid ones.
just an observation.

quote:
Originally posted by legaleagle:
Third Person????
it would refer to those who think with like minds.



--------------------
M.M.
Semester #3 started,Only 7 more semesters to go.
Why, in an age where information is so easy to get, cant we find information on one man.
Experience is something you dont get until just after you need it.

Posts: 1002 | From: Southaven, Mississippi, US | Registered: Nov 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
bill1352
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for bill1352     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
cmkx doesn't have any missing claims. do you think nevada gave back those shares for nothing? they are private thus no need to report. cmkx doesn't nor has it ever reported anything only stuff that somebody has their hands to the fire on. thus whatever you & the cult thinks is missing isn't or probably isnt. either it was defaulted on & pulled by the controlling party or the deal was scrapped. following your thinking means USCA & SGGM get a cut of ALL cmkx assets including the payoff shares of entourage according to the deals. of course not only is SGGM revoked but its board quit, its lawyer quit. from the reports on SGGM the only ppl left are the bagholders of SGGM shares.

--------------------
"keep your stick on the ice & your cup firmly in place"

Posts: 3651 | From: Algonac, MI. 48001 | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Ric
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Ric     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Also CIM supposed to went public last year then after a brief excuse nothing more. To sit here and claim that it still exist is sad, really. It was a tool to help continue the pump. Thats the key to a pump and dump. They hype useless bullchit then dump 703 billion shares on unsuspecting shareholder. Then they pay pumpers to convince you that it didn't happen and after the cats out of the bag then they get the pumpers to convince you that you just didn't get ripped off. To me if you want to get the bad guys in this company you need to flush out the pumpers and sue them along with UC.

--------------------
Invest with your brain not with your heart.

Posts: 4405 | From: Bristol, Tn, USA | Registered: Aug 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
bill1352
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for bill1352     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
right now the cert pull is running at 30,162,000 per cert holder with just over 2000 filed. that equals, if the average were to hold all the way to 50K cert holders, 1.5 trillion. only a bit over 3000 have bothered to send certs in. i'm guessing this means 1 of 2 things either you wont get 10K ppl to bother with this & those that do send in get a lot bigger cut or the proof of a massive short isnt there. its true many may be waiting for certs. the cult pulled most of their certs but left some in accounts for that big run that never happened. as you only get 1 fax to count most will be coming in over the next 2 or 3 weeks. but if it keeps running like this what your hoping for is history.

--------------------
"keep your stick on the ice & your cup firmly in place"

Posts: 3651 | From: Algonac, MI. 48001 | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
ed19363
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for ed19363     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
Originally posted by bill1352:
right now the cert pull is running at 30,162,000 per cert holder with just over 2000 filed. that equals, if the average were to hold all the way to 50K cert holders, 1.5 trillion. only a bit over 3000 have bothered to send certs in. i'm guessing this means 1 of 2 things either you wont get 10K ppl to bother with this & those that do send in get a lot bigger cut or the proof of a massive short isnt there. its true many may be waiting for certs. the cult pulled most of their certs but left some in accounts for that big run that never happened. as you only get 1 fax to count most will be coming in over the next 2 or 3 weeks. but if it keeps running like this what your hoping for is history.

Bill, I dont think that average will hold. Plus the ones that only hold a few shares wont even bother. It's called an exercise in futility. IMO, nothing will ever come of all this. We lost.

--------------------
If I give you bad information, please feel free to sue me. I have nothing left anyway.
Ed

Posts: 1772 | From: Oxford, PA, USA | Registered: Oct 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
CashCowMoo
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for CashCowMoo     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
i got 59,000 shares of AZTM for sale....CHEAP!! .0015.....on the market come and get them! wholesale prices baby

--------------------
It isn't so much that liberals are ignorant. It's just that they know so many things that aren't so.

Posts: 6949 | Registered: Apr 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
legaleagle
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for legaleagle     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
LOL MOO, they're trading at .001
Posts: 2375 | Registered: Nov 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
bill1352
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for bill1352     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
well thought i'd save this from the 3rd page with this comment....they took about 300 off the faxed in list. the filed list increased but the average dropped under 30 million per holder. wanna bet the ones that got stuck with the most shares are the mm's? they have no choice but to buy or sell if an order comes in. i'm bettin if they pulled certs they would get 30% or better of the entourage shares.

--------------------
"keep your stick on the ice & your cup firmly in place"

Posts: 3651 | From: Algonac, MI. 48001 | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Ric
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Ric     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Talking about ETGMF's 6-K (same as a 8-K)


http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1239672/000106299305002923/0001062993-05-002923-index.htm


needdiamonds
God of Diamonds
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,252
Karma: -23
[ Exalt | Smite ] Re: Entourge 6k OUT!
« Reply #4 on Today at 5:11pm »

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Today at 5:05pm, gosh50 wrote:keeping up on claims work and filings due

i like it a lot




Can you cut and paste that part tia alot to go through

I only saw this and it makes me wonder
"1.7 Capital Resources

Our auditors have issued a going concern opinion. This means that there is substantial doubt that we can continue as an on-going business for the next twelve months unless we obtain additional capital to pay our bills. This is because we have not generated any revenues and no revenues are anticipated until we begin removing and selling minerals. Accordingly, we must raise cash continuously from sources other than the sale of minerals found on the properties. That cash must be raised from other sources. Our only other source for cash at this time is investments by others in the Company. We must raise cash to implement our project and stay in business. Even if we raise money, we do not know how long the money will last. It depends upon the amount of exploration we conduct and the cost thereof. We won’t know that information until we advance the exploration of our properties. We will not continue exploration of our properties until we raise money."

--------------------
Invest with your brain not with your heart.

Posts: 4405 | From: Bristol, Tn, USA | Registered: Aug 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
ed19363
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for ed19363     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Aww Gee, that's easy....do like CMKX did....sell more stock....raise the AS to maybe 6 quadrillion....Then stick it to the stockholders.

But dont sponsor any race cars or buy any 3 million dollar homes.

--------------------
If I give you bad information, please feel free to sue me. I have nothing left anyway.
Ed

Posts: 1772 | From: Oxford, PA, USA | Registered: Oct 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
ed19363
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for ed19363     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Can you hear it now?

--------------------
If I give you bad information, please feel free to sue me. I have nothing left anyway.
Ed

Posts: 1772 | From: Oxford, PA, USA | Registered: Oct 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Upside
Member


Icon 1 posted      Profile for Upside     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I miss Wallace.
Posts: 5729 | From: Wisconsin | Registered: Sep 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
  This topic comprises 24 pages: 1  2  3  ...  19  20  21  22  23  24   

Post New Topic  New Poll  
Topic Closed  Topic Closed
Open Topic   Feature Topic   Move Topic   Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:


Contact Us | Allstocks.com Message Board Home

© 1997 - 2021 Allstocks.com. All rights reserved.

Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classic™ 6.7.2

Share