posted
What was the guys name on the BOD of cmkx? Dr. Purrin...? Dr. Puran...? I can't remember,but the article I was thinking of he was allready in a law suit pressing a naked short lawsuit with another company.And I was wondering how that case was coming along.I can't even remember the name of the company.This could be tied up in court,and if you're going to get sued, you're going to countersue,right?
[ April 25, 2005, 22:49: Message edited by: Highwaychild ]
Posts: 2634 | From: The highway | Registered: Feb 2004
| IP: Logged |
URBAN CASAVANT CAROLYN CASAVANT RON CASAVANT ROGER GLENN DESORMEAU(sp)- prev. Treasurer) MELVIN PREVIOUS DIRECTORS TAs (both)
Obvious question:
Donahu as a witness? Why? He's neither an officer nor a member of the Board of Directors. Has he ever been? He has a questionable past when it comes to illegal or improper securties trading. If anything, he owns a good deal of stock and should not be privy to any more information than any other shareholder. IS HE BEING OR HAS HE BEEN GIVEN INSIDE INFORMATION???? If not, what is he qualified to state as to CMKX and it's operations? The answer should be NOTHING!!!! If he has been given such information, he is required to have released it publicly. That IS securities law. And, anyone giving him inside information, such as UC, has also violated securities laws.
Posts: 3607 | From: NJ - Outside Phila. | Registered: Mar 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
oh no guys the jig is up...either we repent & become kool-aide drinking pumpers or the SEC bulldogs will take our keyboards away...well i for 1 will not stand for such bullying tactics. give me bashing cmkx rights or give me back the money UC diluted into nothing...lol....notice the SEC is calling the t/a. last person on the list & ya think maybe the SEC internet inforcer has been in the pt chat room once or twice, with sterling & pals? lets see i'm a basher & i said the o/s was 779 billion in sept. & the company proved me right. i'm a pumpoer & i swore the o/s was not over 10 billion & probably in the millions & came up with wild theories to back my dreamworld up & the company proved me wrong. hmmmmmm i wonder who the SEC would frown upon more?
-------------------- "keep your stick on the ice & your cup firmly in place" Posts: 3651 | From: Algonac, MI. 48001 | Registered: Jun 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
notice on the cmkx list not 1 person to back up any claim info. not 1 mineral expert to say cmkx was not wrong in stating they had mineral rights of any value. but they want to prove this all happened, dilution to 703 billion shares because of naked shorting as the last few items suggests...well the evil mm's naked shorted us into dilution without rules being applied so why cant we dilute our stock without any rules being appied. does that sound like little kids arguing with mom & dad to anyone else?
-------------------- "keep your stick on the ice & your cup firmly in place" Posts: 3651 | From: Algonac, MI. 48001 | Registered: Jun 2004
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Highwaychild: What was the guys name on the BOD of cmkx? Dr. Purrin...? Dr. Puran...? I can't remember,but the article I was thinking of he was allready in a law suit pressing a naked short lawsuit with another company.And I was wondering how that case was coming along.I can't even remember the name of the company.This could be tied up in court,and if you're going to get sued, you're going to countersue,right?
Were you looking for Rupert Perrin, highway?
Posts: 2375 | Registered: Nov 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
I wonder if the SEC knows about Donahu's past record with reference to issuing unregistered securities? He certainly makes a credible witness, huh?
Posts: 3607 | From: NJ - Outside Phila. | Registered: Mar 2004
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by bill1352: notice on the cmkx list not 1 person to back up any claim info. not 1 mineral expert to say cmkx was not wrong in stating they had mineral rights of any value. but they want to prove this all happened, dilution to 703 billion shares because of naked shorting as the last few items suggests...well the evil mm's naked shorted us into dilution without rules being applied so why cant we dilute our stock without any rules being appied. does that sound like little kids arguing with mom & dad to anyone else?
I don't think they were charged with that bill.
Posts: 2375 | Registered: Nov 2004
| IP: Logged |
Isn't CMKX's excuse for not filing and the lie on the Form 15 that they had to have secrecy. That they were going to expose the NSS by not filing. If thats true then they will need to prove that they were actually doing something other then a pump and dump scam. They better prove there was a business besides selling shares and running a funny car.
Do you really think that the SEC won't shut this down even if they are working on filings, if all this ever was, was a cover up for dilution.
-------------------- Invest with your brain not with your heart. Posts: 4405 | From: Bristol, Tn, USA | Registered: Aug 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
Actually they did file and were working with the SEC as they attempted to become fully reporting. Under Sarbanes Oxley, a CEO is held legally responsible for all numbers reported in a filing. The number of shares outstanding was 703 billion, but the CIM dividend showed the company that there were 1.5 trillion shares out there. Which number should Urban have written in the blank? If he reported 703 billion, with knowledge that there was over 1.5 trillion, then he would have been entering false information. If he entered the 1.56 trillion, then that would not have matched the OS. This was the point that was being argued, when the SEC jumped the gun and suspended CMKX before their 60 days was up. IMO
If this was a scam, the SEC would have shut it down during the UCAD / USCA investigation.
Posts: 2375 | Registered: Nov 2004
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by legaleagle: Shhhhhhhh.............listen............can you hear it?
What the toilet flushing, because you are crapping that CMKX stuff again. I told you that you should see your MD about the CMKX diarrhea.
-------------------- Be Careful Of The Toes We Step On Today, They Could Be Attached To The Butt We Have To Kiss Tomorrow Posts: 4727 | From: Elk Grove ( Sacramento )CA USA | Registered: Jun 2004
| IP: Logged |
Geez I did listen to it and all I hear were two Village Idots rambling
-------------------- Be Careful Of The Toes We Step On Today, They Could Be Attached To The Butt We Have To Kiss Tomorrow Posts: 4727 | From: Elk Grove ( Sacramento )CA USA | Registered: Jun 2004
| IP: Logged |
"Under Sarbanes Oxley, a CEO is held legally responsible for all numbers reported in a filing." *********************************
Remember all the pumped up chests stating that Glenn wrote the Sarbanes Oxley Act? Let's not give him all that credit and just suppose he might have participated in producing part(s) of it. And now, UC may try to blame Glenn for UC's incompetence? Guess who probably told UC that they had violated the Securities Exchange Act of 1934? Does the name Roger Glenn ring a bell?
And, legal, you have again confirmed what I have previously posted. That is the fact that Urban Casavant is legally responsible for all SEC filings and their content. That rock and a hard spot stuff you brought up (or than anyone brings up) is bulls hit).
Good night.
Posts: 3607 | From: NJ - Outside Phila. | Registered: Mar 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
But guess what, he quit filing before that so that is no excuse. The SEC didn't call for the special meeting of the boards records for nothing during the time they stopped filing and filed the form 15. Plus that doen's give him the right to lie on the form 15. Thats not cover under the Sarbanes Oxley and also you would have to state your not filing under the provision which wasn't done. They lied and stopped filing. Nothing to do with NSS. Geez
quote:Originally posted by legaleagle: Actually they did file and were working with the SEC as they attempted to become fully reporting. Under Sarbanes Oxley, a CEO is held legally responsible for all numbers reported in a filing. The number of shares outstanding was 703 billion, but the CIM dividend showed the company that there were 1.5 trillion shares out there. Which number should Urban have written in the blank? If he reported 703 billion, with knowledge that there was over 1.5 trillion, then he would have been entering false information. If he entered the 1.56 trillion, then that would not have matched the OS. This was the point that was being argued, when the SEC jumped the gun and suspended CMKX before their 60 days was up. IMO
If this was a scam, the SEC would have shut it down during the UCAD / USCA investigation.
[ April 26, 2005, 01:49: Message edited by: Ric ]
-------------------- Invest with your brain not with your heart. Posts: 4405 | From: Bristol, Tn, USA | Registered: Aug 2004
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Upside: Notice the name Ramy Kassabgui on the DOE witness list? Here's a little bit about him.
"Ramy Kassabgui works for the SEC. He is a Surveillance Specialist with the Internet Enforcement Branch. In other words, he catches criminals in the financial investment arena."
And he catches "bashers" and "pumpers" on line. Uh oh.
I heard he's looking for Bames Jrewer... can anyone help?!?!?
You are so clever drgnfly, or whatever name you use now. Most people here know my real name so you don't have to play games. But do remember, the IPD recorded your tx number, identity and address.
Posts: 2375 | Registered: Nov 2004
| IP: Logged |
CMKX - We didn't file because we felt the stock was being manipulated and under Sarbanes Oxley, a CEO is held legally responsible for all numbers reported in a filing.
SEC att - I thought you stopped filing because you filed a form 15 stating you had under 300 shareholders of record.
CMKX - Well we had to do that so we could caught the NSS
SEC att - So you lied.
CMKX - Well it was to show NSS. Our numbers didn't add up during our stock dividend.
SEC att - didn't you stop filing before that
CMKX - well yes but we feel it was manipulated
SEC att - so you lied to the SEC, lets move on. You say you did this because you couldn't sign off because manipulation in the market but why didn't you file the Required S-8's registering the sells of your stock. Also how about the 8-K's and all the other filing you didn't file not covered under Sarbanes Oxley.
CMKX - well we didn't know much about running a public company.
SEC att - You knew about the Sarbanes Oxley provision but didn't know you had to file with the SEC before selling shares on the market?
CMKX - Well, UC had a stroke and the company was left to be run by someone who didn't understand what needed to be done.
SEC att - Well why was he able to make it out on raace day and spend half the day under a hot shareholders tent if his health was so bad.
CMKX - Its all NSS's fault
-------------------- Invest with your brain not with your heart. Posts: 4405 | From: Bristol, Tn, USA | Registered: Aug 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
Entourage Mining Adds Joint Venture Partners to Nevada Gold Project Tuesday April 26, 4:30 am ET
VANCOUVER, British Columbia, April 26, 2005 (PRIMEZONE) -- Entourage Mining Ltd. (the ``Company'') (OTC BB:ETGMF.OB - News) announces that the Company has added two partners to participate in its Black Warrior gold/silver project in Esmeralda County Nevada (the ``Nevada Gold Project'').
United Carina Resources Corp. (Vancouver:UCA.V - News) and CMKM Diamonds Inc. (Other OTC:CMKX.PK - News) have each been granted the right to acquire a 10% interest in the Nevada Gold Project. Each of the optionees can exercise its option to acquire a 10% interest by:
(a) paying $40,000 to Entourage upon Entourage executing its sub-lease option agreement to purchase a 100% beneficial interest in the Nevada Gold Project; and
(b) making $85,000 USD in work commitments or an amount equal to but not to exceed 10% of Entourage's work expenditures on the Nevada Gold Project.
Entourage welcomes the participation of these companies as the size of the Nevada Gold Project is increasing as more claims are being staked contiguous to the original Black Warrior claim blocks. The company is awaiting drill permits from the Bureau of Land Management and expects to have an extensive drill program underway in the near future.
Entourage Mining Ltd.
``Gregory F. Kennedy''
Gregory F. Kennedy President
Posts: 177 | From: Boston | Registered: Mar 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
legel again with the easily proved false crap. first your idea that cmkx handed the DTC the CIM divy & told them to pass it out is crap. the dtc know which broker got what & thats it. the divys get to the brokers by way of CMKX's transfer agent period. the CIM divy was cut in 1/2 by cmkx just as the second gemm divy was never handed out. as for the SEC shutting cmkx down, it won't happen. frizzle being there will stop it. but i bet dollars to donuts the UC will be barred for life from ever having anything to do with a publicly traded company & fined heavily. Mahoo will take over & the r/s from h**l will be put in place. i bet the a/s is cut to 1 billion & the o/s to less then 500 million. looking at that pr list i'm changing my float guess, UC & family has either 81 billion or 26 billion shares with 94 billion in the company treasury & the rest being the float. roger glen got either 200 or 250 billion shares & those are now in the float. the raise in o/s before the divys was glen's payment & UC took the rest. UC will be gone completely soon. the claims are the companies not his. all he will have left are those shares.
-------------------- "keep your stick on the ice & your cup firmly in place" Posts: 3651 | From: Algonac, MI. 48001 | Registered: Jun 2004
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by bill1352: jeal...why cmkx has had so much volume for so long even the cult has no theory on...lol. if you say its the mm's covering a n/s then there goes your squeeze of the century. the only buying would be cult members, seriously, your new to cmkx, you look at the last few prs, you see 703 billion o/s and a sec investigation. you look at a few boards and see its trading at a .00005 average. do you buy hoping to see .0001?. the only reason to buy now is the need for a tax write off next yr.
-------------------- "Things that make you go hmmmmmm......" Posts: 235 | From: Canada | Registered: Aug 2004
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by bill1352: jeal...why cmkx has had so much volume for so long even the cult has no theory on...lol. if you say its the mm's covering a n/s then there goes your squeeze of the century. the only buying would be cult members, seriously, your new to cmkx, you look at the last few prs, you see 703 billion o/s and a sec investigation. you look at a few boards and see its trading at a .00005 average. do you buy hoping to see .0001?. the only reason to buy now is the need for a tax write off next yr.
Bill - All do respect - this is what I mean. This is where it is possible to be very pessimistic with this stock - WE CAN ASSUME - that the volume is like it is based on your explanation above, however - I again struggle trying to understand that. The volume on this stock is ludicrous. Yes, I understand the trades at 0.0000X; however the volume never changes regardless of the news / rumors etc....sorry, but I beleive there has to be another reason - good bad or indifferent ( per the shareholder )
-------------------- "Things that make you go hmmmmmm......" Posts: 235 | From: Canada | Registered: Aug 2004
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Wallace#1: JEAL wrote: ""You have the IQ of a parking meter." I am aware that you said that is something your wife said.
Well, Jeal, that's somewhat better of being called "stupid", huh? LOL
I did like your analysis, but do not agree with it as you know. If CMKX had even the slightest potential, as "stupid" as UC seems to be, don't you think he would have done a lot more to discover it? Instead, it's race cars, credit cards, marked diamonds (and I really wonder how anyone would believe authenticity if he was involved with the marking), etc., etc.
Obviously, your current position is to buy no more CMKX shares. That IS "smart".
Wallace - if stupid is the worse thing that I get called today - then I guess I should consider myself pretty lucky - LOL.
Regarding the above - I do agree with your statement and thank you for the comment on my analysis; and I do appreciate / understand your statements on not agreeeing with my position However, you question ....."do you not think he would have done more to discover it?". This could be a REAL long shot, however, we do criticize UC for being a little "odd" ( being polite ) Maybe there is a lot of truth in what some say - he is an idiot. Maybe this is part of the problem. Maybe he didnt do anything because his experiences and abilities deemed him incapable of handling something of this magnitude. - OR this is just a scam. Ultimately, at the end of the day, weather I am right or wrong, this can still go either way....
-------------------- "Things that make you go hmmmmmm......" Posts: 235 | From: Canada | Registered: Aug 2004
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Trader O: Entourage Mining Adds Joint Venture Partners to Nevada Gold Project Tuesday April 26, 4:30 am ET
VANCOUVER, British Columbia, April 26, 2005 (PRIMEZONE) -- Entourage Mining Ltd. (the ``Company'') (OTC BB:ETGMF.OB - News) announces that the Company has added two partners to participate in its Black Warrior gold/silver project in Esmeralda County Nevada (the ``Nevada Gold Project'').
United Carina Resources Corp. (Vancouver:UCA.V - News) and CMKM Diamonds Inc. (Other OTC:CMKX.PK - News) have each been granted the right to acquire a 10% interest in the Nevada Gold Project. Each of the optionees can exercise its option to acquire a 10% interest by:
(a) paying $40,000 to Entourage upon Entourage executing its sub-lease option agreement to purchase a 100% beneficial interest in the Nevada Gold Project; and
(b) making $85,000 USD in work commitments or an amount equal to but not to exceed 10% of Entourage's work expenditures on the Nevada Gold Project.
Entourage welcomes the participation of these companies as the size of the Nevada Gold Project is increasing as more claims are being staked contiguous to the original Black Warrior claim blocks. The company is awaiting drill permits from the Bureau of Land Management and expects to have an extensive drill program underway in the near future.
Entourage Mining Ltd.
``Gregory F. Kennedy''
Gregory F. Kennedy President
More money spent while there is no filing, no information, the PPS sits at .0001 or less. IMO these guys are having an awful lot of fun with our money while we all sit here waiting.
Posts: 1772 | From: Oxford, PA, USA | Registered: Oct 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
drgnfly, there really is no need to get that carried away and attack legal's handicapp. I had mine attacked too, and I guarantee you, it is not pleasant. Please stop. It serves neither you nor anyone else any purpose whatsoever.
Posts: 3607 | From: NJ - Outside Phila. | Registered: Mar 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
Thanks Jeal and Wallace, but I take no offense from his attacks. This is not his first time doing this. He has appeared here and on other boards, under many different names. He has been banned from them as well. He is a sick person who is in need of help, and I pray for him.
Posts: 2375 | Registered: Nov 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
ed19363 said: "More money spent while there is no filing, no information, the PPS sits at .0001 or less. IMO these guys are having an awful lot of fun with our money while we all sit here waiting. "
Ed, a company still on the acquisition trail does not look like a company cowering under threats from the SEC or "having fun with our money". As a matter of fact it looks like a company, confident that the SEC action will have no bearing on their continued movement forward.
Posts: 2375 | Registered: Nov 2004
| IP: Logged |
Entourage Enters Into Saskatchewan Uranium Agreement Friday April 8, 4:00 am ET
VANCOUVER, British Columbia, April 8, 2005 (PRIMEZONE) -- Entourage Mining Ltd. (the ``Company'') (OTC BB:ETGMF.OB - News) wishes to report that the Company has entered into an option agreement with United Carina Resources Corp. (``United Carina'') (Vancouver:UCA.V - News) whereby Entourage can earn a twenty percent (20%) interest in certain claim blocks consisting of 14,529 hectares (35,800 acres) of prospective uranium properties located in the Hatchet Lake area of the eastern Athabaska Basin in north-central Saskatchewan. ADVERTISEMENT
The properties are contiguous and have been subject to previous exploration for uranium; one surface showing yielded assays ranging from 0.3 per cent U3O8 to 1.4 per cent U3O8. An additional claim block in the area, that has been staked but not yet registered, will become part of the agreement upon registration. The properties are located 30 kilometers north and northeast of four known uranium deposits (Rabbit Lake, McLean Lake, Collins Bay and Eagle Point). United Carina will be the operator of the project and Dave Billard, of Saskatoon, Sask., will be the qualified person for the project.
To exercise its option and acquire the 20% interest, the Company will make a cash payment of $40,000 to United Carina and participate in the exploration program by making expenditure contributions of $100,000 per year for two years for a total of CDN$200,000 over two years.
The Athabaska Basin of northern Saskatchewan contains the most significant high grade, low cost uranium deposits in the world. The deposits defined to date collectively contain, or have produced, almost 1.5 billion pounds U3O8.
Entourage Mining Ltd. is a metal exploration Company with prospective mineral properties in Nevada, Yukon Territory and Quebec.
For further information call Craig Doctor at 1-866-301-4077.
"Gregory Kennedy" President Gregory F. Kennedy
Forward Looking Statement
Except for historical information contained herein, the statements in this Press Release may be forward looking statements. Forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties, which may cause Entourage Mining Ltd.'s actual results in future periods to differ materially from forecasted results. These risks and uncertainties include, among other things, volatility of commodity prices, product demand, market competition, and risks inherent in Entourage Mining Ltd.'s operations. These and other risks are described in the Company's Annual Report on Form 20-F and other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Contact:
Entourage Mining Ltd. Craig Doctor 1-866-301-4077 craig@entouragemining.com
UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!
Printer-friendly view of this topic
![[Big Grin]](biggrin.gif)
