quote:Originally posted by Highwaychild: HA HA HA!LMAO All I can say... I hope he has the chit.
I am not sure if he has the "chit" but we know for sure that he is full of something and it does not look like diamonds, it don't smell like diamonds. Some dark dull brown stuff. Nope its not diamonds, it must be the "chit"
Are you talking about gold???LOL Oh, no.That's not dark, dull, or brown. Posts: 2634 | From: The highway | Registered: Feb 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
The only person who is going to see gold is Urban, not you or I my friend.
Just for the record I still have plenty of shares in this toilet paper factory.
-------------------- Be Careful Of The Toes We Step On Today, They Could Be Attached To The Butt We Have To Kiss Tomorrow Posts: 4727 | From: Elk Grove ( Sacramento )CA USA | Registered: Jun 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
boised...its a great way to pass the day.. so much easy material.
-------------------- "keep your stick on the ice & your cup firmly in place" Posts: 3651 | From: Algonac, MI. 48001 | Registered: Jun 2004
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by bill1352: i guess that wasn't oreo cookies they found
Maybe yellow cake?
Urban Flake is more like it
-------------------- Be Careful Of The Toes We Step On Today, They Could Be Attached To The Butt We Have To Kiss Tomorrow Posts: 4727 | From: Elk Grove ( Sacramento )CA USA | Registered: Jun 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
OK, you guys!! Let's clean up this thread I started. LOL Now we're back to corn cobs which are close to being a "pipe". SHAME ON YOU!!!! CMKX is a serious challenge and investment!
Posts: 3607 | From: NJ - Outside Phila. | Registered: Mar 2004
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Wallace#1: OK, you guys!! Let's clean up this thread I started. LOL Now we're back to corn cobs which are close to being a "pipe". SHAME ON YOU!!!! CMKX is a serious challenge and investment!
Geez: Did you physician put you on some new medication ? You had better stop taking it due to the serious side effects
-------------------- Be Careful Of The Toes We Step On Today, They Could Be Attached To The Butt We Have To Kiss Tomorrow Posts: 4727 | From: Elk Grove ( Sacramento )CA USA | Registered: Jun 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
STOCKGATE TODAY-January 24, 2005 An online newspaper reporting the issues of Securities Fraud
Are Regulators Liable for their Securities Violations? - January 24, 2005
David Patch
In reviewing the daily Securities and Exchange Commissions news digest I frequently read of Brokers or Corporate Officers being cited for alleged schemes to deceive. The cases brought forward by the SEC will cite violations of Section 17(a) of the 1933 Securities Act and Section 10(b); Rule 10b-5 of the 1934 Securities Act in the complaints. In each the allegations pertain to the presentation of materially false or misleading information used as a mechanism to manipulate a stock price.
For those wondering, Rule 10b-5 of the 1934 Act says it shall be unlawful “to make any untrue statement of a material fact or to omit to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in the light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading.” Sections 17(a) and 109b) simply get into the acts of obtaining money through misleading information and interstate commerce violation. So under this rule, how is it accepted when the Securities Regulators may present materially false and misleading information to the public affecting stock pricings and to some degree receive money, by way of trade volume transactions, in the violation?
When the SEC released their sweeping reforms pertaining to short selling they did so by stating that these reforms would address the abuses incurred by excessive “naked short selling”. They publicly cited the potential abuses caused by excesses in naked shorting and presented how this reform would address such abuses. Privately they informed Congress as well that Regulation SHO would resolve the now more public issue.
The SEC released to the public Regulation SHO on June 23, 2004 and provided the industry six months to prepare their systems for this sweeping reform package. January 3, 2005 being the introductory date for full compliance.
For those who were fortunate enough to listen in on a Bear Stearns conference call on December 13, 2004 we were enlightened to hear that the SEC and regulators may have actually taken SHO seriously. The General Council for Bear Stearns initiated the call by identifying that SHO came about over years of concerns and private conversations with regulators about the industry practice of not following established laws. The call eventually discussed the “threshold security list”, the list of settlement abused companies, and Richard Bernstein, managing director of operations highlighted that regulators had been providing a “would be list” for over a month that contained over 1000 potentially abused companies. Mr. Bernstein broke down the list by the number of companies representing specific trading markets or quoting service.
Although the question of the confidentiality of the list concerns me; did the Regulators have the right to present non-public information to Bear Stearns, the fact that the list was of this size showed the magnitude of the issue and the acknowledgement by the regulators. The list also provided insight that the abuses could slow down if not cease altogether when the list of 1000 would be made public and as regulators started to enforce laws they had ignored for so many years past.
But then something happened on the way to print. The list of 1000 companies never made it to the public. A phantom editor dissected it on the way to the press.
On January 7, 2005 the NASDAQ presented it’s first “threshold security list” and on it was a sum total of 379 NASDAQ NMS, small-cap, OTCBB and Pink Sheet Securities. This compared to a reported 900+ that Bear Stearns identified would make the list from these category stocks. What happened to the 500+ that are missing?
What happened was, on January 14, 2005 the list was merely trimmed again and yet another 250 or so companies were removed bringing the list down to a paltry 111 companies. Many of those removed had not even traded since they were added initially.
In all, nearly 750 OTCBB and Pink Sheet Companies were trimmed from the list between December 13, 2004 and January 14, 2005. During this same window of trading the number of NASDAQ NMS, small-cap, AMEX, and NYSE securities remained nearly identical with more additions than subtractions. In the OTCBB and Pink Sheet quoting service of relative illiquid securities the Industry was able to wipe out 750 Issuer settlement problems. The Industry failed to resolve nearly any of the 250 highly liquid NASDAQ, NYSE, and AMEX securities listed during this same timeline.
This anomaly leads to a direct question. Is the list an accurate depiction of abused companies or has the NASD published a document that is an untrue statement of material fact that can be used to manipulate and deceive investors? Did the NASD violate Rule 10b-5 of the 1934 Securities Act while also violating the public disclosure rules of Regulation SHO? Or, was the data presented by the NSCC doctored to manipulate the publication results?
While these are harsh accusations, consider this.
Bear Stearns has claimed their list came from the regulators. Those are the same regulators who are now required to make the list public. In the list of 1000 that was disseminated in December to Bear Stearns are the very names of NASDAQ listed securities that the NASD published on January 7. So how could the 100 NASDAQ securities be correct and the 800 OTCBB and Pink Sheets be totally inaccurate when the same organization was conducting both calculations? The data is calculated by the NASD after receiving fail data from the NSCC’s Continuous Net Settlement System.
Furthermore, in a PIPE’s report dated January 15, 2005 Jeffrey Meyerson of Crown Financial was quoted regarding the published lists “I don’t think they got everything done in time” going further stating “I wouldn’t be surprised if we see it really different a month from now”. Crown Financial is a Market Maker on the NASDAQ exchange utilizing the naked shorting exemptions permitted in their bona-fide market making activities. Crown Financial would also be one better equipped to know how accurately securities are trading and settling as they themselves carry fails and execute the orders that may not settle.
If the NASD had not “got everything done in time” they should have published that material fact as a disclaimer to the list. The disclaimer would have protected investors looking for the list as a material fact regarding the abuse they have suffered. But then, if they did not get it done in time, what was the list they provided to Bear Stearns and how come they could not comply after being provided six months to do so?
Posts: 2375 | Registered: Nov 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
ya know if all this naked short stuff is true about cmkx & it might be why not protect its investors & publish all needed info. this "quiet period" & alledged behind the seen deals do nothing for the investors. the only reason for it is hiding the truth. if investors find out the true o/s is 779 billion how many pumpers will be left compared to bashers. a woman scorned may be h**l but a ripped off investor is worse.
-------------------- "keep your stick on the ice & your cup firmly in place" Posts: 3651 | From: Algonac, MI. 48001 | Registered: Jun 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
STOCKGATE TODAY-January 24, 2005 An online newspaper reporting the issues of Securities Fraud
Urban you had better keep looking over your shoulder, they are on your trail
-------------------- Be Careful Of The Toes We Step On Today, They Could Be Attached To The Butt We Have To Kiss Tomorrow Posts: 4727 | From: Elk Grove ( Sacramento )CA USA | Registered: Jun 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
The question is ? Where or what did it kick?
-------------------- Be Careful Of The Toes We Step On Today, They Could Be Attached To The Butt We Have To Kiss Tomorrow Posts: 4727 | From: Elk Grove ( Sacramento )CA USA | Registered: Jun 2004
| IP: Logged |
Seems like the new cmkx web site designer is blacksheepdesigngroup.
quote:Originally posted by will: Truth, I enjoyed it. Thanks for psoting it. I especially enjoyed this part: "Between the Denver race, the other races, the halloween party, the dividend dates, the december dates, the SHO dates, and on and on and on, I find it hard to believe that anybody is STILL insisting that they "know" or even "truly believe" we will see a filing by any particular date (and for the record, Andy has no actual timeline on anything, despite what others have posted)." He's 100% right it's a new "what if" with an event or date attached to it that comes and goes without anything materializing, so it's on to the next grand scheme. These poor dillusional people that really believe this thing is shorted, and will be covered through a negotiated settlement between CMKX, SEC, DTC, MM's, are just being unreal. None of the above angencies could give a crap about CMKX's situation, which is the insane amount of O/S, not a shorting problem.
quote:Originally posted by Thorn: I find none of this dialog helpful. Why don't you guys go play in the sandbox.
Exactly what would you like to hear that would be the least bit helpful or that you do not or should not already know? Are you aware of anything new or useful that has not been fully disected and discussed? Did CMKX acquire a claim to a sandbox somewhere along the way? If so, that's not sand, it's kimberlite....and we have already played there.
Posts: 3607 | From: NJ - Outside Phila. | Registered: Mar 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
CMKX just filed today they have 1 share outstanding WOW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Posts: 795 | From: Brown Deer, WI 53223 | Registered: Feb 2004
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by joeyisthebest: CMKX just filed today they have 1 share outstanding WOW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Gender: Posts: 166 Good Valuation of CMKX « Thread started on: Jan 22nd, 2005, 12:47pm »
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I have never seen Dr. D or George burns theories come true, but I have seen alot of Coreton's theories come to pass, Therefore I thought this would be a good read.
Written by: Coreton
First the valuation from CMKX shown on the 10QSB is $33,750,000 in stock for 5% and $13,500,000 in cash for 9% for a total asset valuation of $47,250,000 for 14% of CMKX claims. this Means we need to find out how much of USCAs pps is represented by CMKX claims. We have the total Evaluation for USCA of 73,834,515 from the 10QSB. This represents 100% of the valuation for USCA since there are no other assets or revenues at this time.
Now we can figure what percentage of USCAs pps is represented by CMKX claims by Dividing 47,250,000 by 73,834,515
47,250,000/73,834,515 = .634
Now we can take the current pps of USCA and multiply by this number to find out how much of USCAs pps is reflective of the CMKX claims.
USCA closing price on 11/18/2004 was $3.00
$3.00 x .634 = $1.902
This means that of the $3.00 pps of USCA the market has valued the CMKX claims at $1.902 for USCA.
Mow we must convert the 63+ million shares of USCA to the 779+billion shares of CMKX to get a ratio to figure the pps of CMKX if it is traded with the exact same principles as USCA is today.
we can get this number doing this equation. OS of usca 63,603,066 (from the 10QSB) Divided by the calculated OS of CMKX using the reverse math widely excepted for the UCAD div 7,500,000/.00000962 which is 779,625,779,625 OS for CMKX
63,603,066/779625,779,625 = .0000816 ratio
Now we can figure the pps target for CMKX based on these two number if CMKX only held 14% of it's claims
$1.902 x .0000816 = $0.0001552
So the PPS for cmkx would be $0.0001552 if CMKX only held 14% of the claims.
However CMKX holds 81% of it's claims remember USCA has 14% and SGGM holds 5%. So how much more does CMKX hold that USCA? Simple 81% divided by 14% will give you the ratio of CMKX to USCA...
81/14 = 5.7857
This means that CMKX holds 5.7857 times more claims than USCA. so now we get the true valuation as set by the market and the currently accepted accounting practices in the United States. $0.0001552 x 5.7857= $0.0008979
So in a nut shell the market has given us a snap shot of where CMKX should be trading RIGHT now as of today. That pps is $0.0009.
Now we must also remember that the Mine in Ecuador came on line after the 9/30/2004 filing date and so did CMKX acquisition of the Uranium claim in northern Sask. so there are things that have happened since the date for the 10QSB filing period that are not included in the original valuation.
I think it is very plain to see why UC RG ED RW were all saying we should drop a Zero by the Party. IMO the 10QSB was submitted around the 26th of October and the tremendous jump in valuation caused the Suspension of USCA and delayed the filing till now. This 10QSB clearly shows that based on today's accepted accounting practices and the current market value placed on such accounting practices, should have CMKX trading today at .0009 or higher.
The Numbers above with the exception of the OS for CMKX are all in the 10QSB the ONLY figure in question would be what we think the OS for CMKX is therefore I will say that this is a realistic view of where CMKXs pps should be at this point and time. Clearly .0002 is well below the expected pps under current conditions.
posted
I think you guys just like to play with numbers. I remember one of my teachers in high school could prove that 1 equaled zero. When will yall learn that these numbers ALL equal zero until the company tells you what the numbers really are. This horse is dead.
-------------------- If I give you bad information, please feel free to sue me. I have nothing left anyway. Ed Posts: 1772 | From: Oxford, PA, USA | Registered: Oct 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
its running!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1 jump in while ya can..........it's the cover. mm's are buying at .0002...........lol
-------------------- "keep your stick on the ice & your cup firmly in place" Posts: 3651 | From: Algonac, MI. 48001 | Registered: Jun 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
someone sold 9 million at .0002 & someone bought at .0003
-------------------- "keep your stick on the ice & your cup firmly in place" Posts: 3651 | From: Algonac, MI. 48001 | Registered: Jun 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
Bill, where you seeing this? Ameritrade is showing the same old .0001/.0002.
-------------------- If I give you bad information, please feel free to sue me. I have nothing left anyway. Ed Posts: 1772 | From: Oxford, PA, USA | Registered: Oct 2004
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by bill1352: someone sold 9 million at .0002 & someone bought at .0003
http://www.casavantmining.com/ is currently unavailable? Could they be updating it with current news? Or, do they just feel they don't need to tell the shareholders about how there spending more shareholders money on racing then drilling? IMNO (In my negative opinion) and still holding and waiting to dump.... Cowboy
Posts: 105 | From: "Western", NY USA | Registered: Aug 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
It's been shut down for about a week now. Your guess as to whether they're getting ready to launch a new one, or go away forever. Depends on your outlook, I guess...
-------------------- If I give you bad information, please feel free to sue me. I have nothing left anyway. Ed Posts: 1772 | From: Oxford, PA, USA | Registered: Oct 2004
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by ed19363: It's been shut down for about a week now. Your guess as to whether they're getting ready to launch a new one, or go away forever. Depends on your outlook, I guess...
Ed, Thanks, guess I've ignored this one and like everyone I have been waiting for some news... Cowboy
Posts: 105 | From: "Western", NY USA | Registered: Aug 2004
| IP: Logged |
Hey folks, I'm going to lock this thread to keep it clean. I will start another thread specifically for people to discuss and comment on the content of this report.
I spoke to Andrew Hill, investor relations (IR) representative for CMKM Diamonds, Inc., for about 50 minutes on January 24, 2005. I have included much of what Andy said here. Where possible I have used direct quotes. In some cases I’ve cleaned up the sentence structure a bit from what was actually said, just to make it more readable. In a few cases I’ve just paraphrased Andy, but only in cases where precision isn’t important.
The rest of this report is basically a list of Andy’s statements presented in the order in which they occurred during the conversation. I have added my comments in blue where appropriate. Enjoy!
1) Andy remembers me from when he followed the message boards.
It’s always gratifying to be remembered, LOL!
2) “I try to be consistent. People who knew me before from the boards or as friends know that I’m consistent. I don’t embellish. I don’t mislead. All I’ve got is my integrity.”
A man after my own heart.
3) Andy asked Urban: “What can I tell people to get some optimism to start the year? I don’t want to start the year off with people feeling the way they have.”
Urban said: “Tell everybody that everything is fine with the company and that we’re close.”
Andy made it clear to me that both he and Urban are well aware of shareholder sentiment and frustration. They don’t like it any more than we do.
4) “Can I get you a Mc Rumor while you’re here? Would you like fries with your Mc Rumor?”
ROTFLMAO! Andy really is a great guy!
5) “I don’t think the company spends a lot of time worrying about what’s on message boards. Urban does not read message boards.”
This should not come as a surprise to anybody.
6) “I’ve never had any question of “if”. It’s always been for me “when” and I certainly wouldn’t be doing this for Urban if I didn’t fell that way. I’ve got other opportunities out there. I’ve done this kind of work for quite a while. I had another opportunity I was assessing at the same time. Plus I started the Zooming Stocks thing with Jose. When Urban approached me he asked “What are you going to do with Zooming Stocks”. I said “that’s over” I’ll step down from that.”
7) “Integrity to me is everything.”
8) “I don’t comment on the speculation or the rumors. That’s for shareholders.”
9) “I don’t spend much time reading the boards; I just don’t have the time.”
Andy told me that he does not go into PalTalk at all.
10) “Urban has access to me 24 hours a day. If he needs me he can call me at 4 in the morning. I don’t call him every day. I call him if I need something or have a question that has come out of a conversation with a shareholder.”
11) “Consistently since the beginning of the year he (Urban) has said “Everything is fine, we’re close’. He’s confident. His mood has gotten better every time I’ve talked to him since January 5th. When I talked to him Friday I asked “everything going good?” and he said “oh yeah”.”
12) “He’s (Urban) not going to give me inside information.”
13) “People just don’t understand the process well enough and how important it is in terms of companies being in the quiet period. You just can’t say anything about the operational side of your company; you’re not allowed to. Either on the phone, in a press release, on the web site. Nothin’. And that’s why we haven’t seen any operational updates since the end of October.”
14) In this part of the conversation, the questions I asked are relevant to the answers:
Andy: “I presume the real quiet period started basically November 1.”
PW: “Do you know if this is a company imposed quiet period?”
Andy: “No, it’s imposed by the process they’re going through.”
PW: “The only 2 quiet periods that I know about are ones that the company imposes on itself for protection while it’s accomplishing something, the other would be one that comes from the SEC itself.”
Andy: “Oh this is SEC.”
15) “…Because you’re in a quiet period pending either a filing or a registration. They might be doing a new registration because he (Urban) went non-reporting. I don’t exactly know what we have coming. I tell people to be careful, we don’t know if we’re just getting a CMKX filing, we don’t know if we’re getting a CIM, a CIM/CMKX, or vice versa, or whether we’re going to get a smorgasbord that involves all the inter-related companies (GEMM etc.)”
16) “There are a lot of requirements from Sarbanes-Oxley on getting this filing prepared. He’s (Urban) got to have a board of directors, he’s got to have a governance committee, all this stuff has to be in place wherein maybe they could have had the financial part of it ready but maybe the other parts of the filing were not. They might have to spend another quarter.”
17) According to Andy, UCAD is now compliant with Sarbanes-Oxley, even though they never PRed this fact.
18) Andy said that CMKX must be compliant with Sarbanes-Oxley with this filing. This is not something that they can do later.
19) “As Urban said “whenever I say anything to shareholders I also tell the enemy.””
20) “When you’re going to war, already have won the war.”
I believe Andy means that the company did not engage the enemy on the field of battle until they were certain that they had everything they needed to win.
21) “The only way he’s going to lose this is if he runs out of money. He’s not going to run out of money. There’s lots of money behind this company. That just doesn’t concern me at all.”
22) Andy and I talked a bit about the history of naked shorting and the justification that MMs give for it. A popular argument is that they are helping to kill off potential pump and dumps. MMs started doing this to supplement income lost when the market went from fractions to decimals. MMs are not needed anymore. ECN platforms can do the job just as well.
23) Jim Decosta is a preeminent expert on Naked Shorting. Andy had an hour long conversation with him about naked shorting. He predicts the demise of MMs in 5 years. He says that our system will be similar to Canada’s. Canadian stock market does not have MMs.
He also says that Canadian stock markets do not have a naked shorting problem. That’s different from the naked shorting that Canadian brokers perpetrate on US securities.
24) “You go through the door with your filings you take the dice that shorty’s been using to short with loaded dice at the pink craps table. How do you get back all of the money that he made illegally rolling the dice?
You get the price of your shares to go up through demand, through people having more belief in your company, through doing your filing, being compliant, doing your insider statements, putting out PRs that show that you’re growing your company and shareholders should demand a higher price.
If you get your share price to go up, you’re going to force shorty to start handing the money back through the door to the system and to you and if your price starts to go up a lot, he’s going to have to hand the money back really fast. i.e. a short squeeze. But you’ve got to go through the door first to beat the dice.”
25) “What I can guarantee you is part of the filing process and the quiet period also required is Urban and the company and any of the other so-called insiders are hands off the market. They can’t buy a share or sell a share. It’s not allowed. So any of this stuff, these big volume days, you know, I asked Urban about that, when we had that 32B in December, I said “What’d you think of that volume?” and he said “It’s got nothing to do with me.” They’re just mucking around with it.”
I believe Andy was talking about the MMs “mucking around with it”, but I’m not sure; I didn’t think to ask for clarification.
26) “So its like I see people out there perpetuating for the masses: “oh it’s just more dilution by the company”, and it’s hogwash. Not happening.”
27) Andy told me that the purpose of Ecuadorian gold is to provide cash flow for the company to help fund more development in the FALC area. We already knew this of course.
28) Urban told Andy that he was going to do a winter drill program, but Andy does not know if it is going on or not. This is also not news.
29) “Anything operational I know he (Urban) can’t talk about if he’s doing this the right way.”
30) “Back towards the end of November, early December time frame, I received evidence that there was IMO more chatter than there should be from people close to him (Urban) and I said “Are we in a quiet period” and he said “Yeah, you already know that”, and I said “well, I think you need to make it a little quieter”. And I told him that there’s people out there with access to cell phone numbers and stuff like that in the shareholder base and I said “I think you need to get it a little quieter” and he said “Ok I’m on it”. Next day, “How ya doing on improving the quiet period?” he says “It’s real quiet now”.”
31) “People that have reached him recently, and I asked him this last week too, I said “are any of the high profile people reaching you and are you commenting to any degree? I need to know stuff like that.” And he (Urban) said “If they do get a hold of me I’m pleasant to them and I tell them that I can’t say anything. And if they push me, I got two words for them.”
They’re not getting anything out of him other than “everything is fine, hang in there”.”
32) “What I don’t do is give people firm dates. I don’t give dates. ‘Cuz that’s not up to me. I don’t write the press releases, so how could I possibly give a date?”
33) “On MLK weekend I said ‘have a safe long weekend everyone” and there were people out there who spent 2 hours analyzing that statement!”
Andy was talking about a comment he made on a message board that he’s been a member of for about five years. Basically he’s saying that people spend WAY too much time trying to find hidden messages in his comments, and that there are NO hidden messages in what he says to people. There’s no wink wink nudge nudge innuendo stuff in what he tells people, just the straight story.
34) “I would rather say “I don’t know” rather than “I can’t comment.””
Andy is not privy to any inside information.
35) Andy is an independent consultant, not an “employee” of CMKX.
36) Andy is about an 18 hour drive from the FALC in the summer. In winter he would have to fly most of the time due to mountain passes being closed due to snow.
37) Ron Casavant is in charge of the drilling operations in the FALC.
38) “He (Urban), I’m quite sure, would like this filing to be done yesterday like all of us. He’s no different. If people don’t think he appreciates the shareholders and the desire to communicate with them then they just don’t know him.”
39) “He (Urban) just became a grandparent not too long ago.”
40) “As part of my DD when I looked into this thing well over a year ago I looked at when he (Urban) had his company PetroPlus in Canada, I went through all the old stuff, through the CEDAR filings up here which is the SEC for us, and I couldn’t see one blemish. Not one. He’d never been investigated; he’s never been in trouble with the Canadian securities people.
This thing going on in Saskatchewan is purely bureaucratic. A bunch of nonsense as far as I’m concerned and as far as he’s concerned too, but it’s with his legal people and it will be dealt with as soon as possible. It’s not being ignored; he knows it must be resolved. And it will be.”
41) That’s pretty much it. Andy said he enjoyed talking with me and looked forward to speaking with me more in the future. He also asked me to pass along to shareholders that they should not be getting stressed out over CMKX. People have enough stress in their lives without stressing over CMKX too. It’s clear that Andy has no worries about the future of CMKX.
Posts: 2375 | Registered: Nov 2004
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by ed19363: I think you guys just like to play with numbers. I remember one of my teachers in high school could prove that 1 equaled zero. When will yall learn that these numbers ALL equal zero until the company tells you what the numbers really are. This horse is dead.
UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!
Printer-friendly view of this topic
![[Smile]](smile.gif)
![[Big Grin]](biggrin.gif)
