Allstocks.com's Bulletin Board Post New Topic  New Poll  Post A Reply
my profile login | register | search | faq | forum home

  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Allstocks.com's Bulletin Board » Micro Penny Stocks, Penny Stocks $0.10 & Under » CMKX.............. (Page 2)

 - UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!   This topic comprises 35 pages: 1  2  3  4  5  ...  33  34  35   
Author Topic: CMKX..............
Wallace#1
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Wallace#1         Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
legaleagle,

Obviously you enjoy pushing the wrong "buttons".

Here's something you posted that is the wordiest bunch of crap you have stated and is worthy of your credibility:

"Anything written above, by me, is pure speculation or opinion except for facts which I may or may not back up. It is your responsibility to figure out if my "facts" are true or not. Do not buy or sell anything based on what I write."

Wallace: Now there's someone to whom everyone should listen!!!!

Further observations........

legaleagle: "And until we have facts, no one is completely right or wrong. Not me, not you, not will or Wallace#1."

Wallace: It does not take a rocket scientist to look at the facts outlined by myself and by others to reach the obvious conclusion about CMKX. It's simply a question of balance and you consistently and hardheadedly refuse to check the scale.

legaleagle: "Then there are the non-shareholding "negs" like Wallace#1, of whom you wonder; "Why are they here at all". Oh yes, to save the "unsuspecting"."

Wallace: You conveniently left out the fact that I have previously owned CMKX. Even if I hadn't, I am sure my qualifications far surpass your's when it comes to experience. And, YES, I would like to enlighten the "unsuspecting" like beginner who recently posted. That poor newbie wasted $600 on CMKX and cannot get rid of that albatross. The problem, unfortunately, is that they seem to buy into the hype without a full history of the security, of the people running the operation, of their associates (companies included) or of people, such as yourself, who incessently tell them that CMKX is the deal of a lifetime implying CMKX share ownership will bring them all kinds of wealth.

legaleagle: "All in my humble opinion."

Wallace: "humble"???? LOL

Posts: 3607 | From: NJ - Outside Phila. | Registered: Mar 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
legaleagle
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for legaleagle     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
I rest my case Wallace#1. If you have no facts to back up your opinion, attack the messenger. You speak as though you have enumerated countless elements of DD. But everyone knows your DD amounts to: "This is a POS" and you fall back on some alleged experience on Wall Street, yet when you first came to the board you didn't know what a Market Maker was. Then when you spew that unsubstantiated garbage about the stock, your "good old boys" come out to back you up, and attack anyone who brings anything positive to this board, not the information, the messenger.

Intelligent and mature investors see through your facade, and leave. That is why when I first started posting here a couple of months ago, I told you I wasn't going to be drug into the personal confrontations. I broke that rule recently to allow other positive posters to see that they don't have to pushed around by the "verbal bullies" here. With that, I am reinforcing the rule. You, and your cohorts will not be able to engage me any further in your verbal "poster" assaults.

Posts: 2375 | Registered: Nov 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
legaleagle
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for legaleagle     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Here is an intersting exchange that took place on Paltalk the other night:


crazyfordiamonds: Talked with Joel Katzman President and ceo of JP Morgan alternative asset Management (hedge Funds) yesterday as my show interviewed him

crazyfordiamonds: actually I shot the interview crazyfordiamonds: talked to him about cmkx

crazyfordiamonds: basically my reporter and I talked with him for about a good hour. his interview ran yesterday on our show Nightly Business Report

nexdude: What station?

crazyfordiamonds: pbs

crazyfordiamonds: we're a national show

nexdude: When will it air?

usfoodman: talked to who for an hour???

crazyfordiamonds: business

sgbry_1: crazy who did you talk to

teamplayersbc: give us the juicy part

crazyfordiamonds: Joel Katzman he is President and CEO of JP Morgan alternative asset Mangagment…(hedge funds)

crazyfordiamonds: anyway

usfoodman: what does that have to do with CMKX

crazy crazyfordiamonds: he said the sec is asking him for help as far as this shorting thing because they don't have a clue

TBeezley1: hahahahaha

crazyfordiamonds: I'm getting to that us usfoodman: ok

crazyfordiamonds: he is giving them classes at the start of Feb 2005

TBeezley1: funny

crazyfordiamonds: what to do and look for

crazyfordiamonds: Anyway We talked about CMKX

crazyfordiamonds: I told him about the company and asked him if he know of the company

teamplayersbc: juice commin up

crazyfordiamonds: I laughed you guys should of seen the look on his face

crazyfordiamonds: he smiled and tried to play stupid with me

crazyfordiamonds: he later said that yes he had heard of the company

TBeezley1: Probably had 50 bil naked shorts in his back pocket

TBeezley1: Wonder if he's based in the Bahamas.

crazyfordiamonds: well he said there's a big problem with shorting in all Hedge funds

TBeezley1: No doubt

pontiyak: crazy...duh !

crazyfordiamonds: he said sho will not effect many of the stocks it will take along time before it does

crazyfordiamonds: he did not disclose the amount of CMKX he or the company owes however he knew of the company and continues to follow the company./He was aware of the companies holdings up in Canada and other places

crazyfordiamonds: Tbeezley I'm a photographer/editor for the show

TBeezley1: got it.

crazyfordiamonds: i edited the interview last night

TBeezley1: Glad you're part of us

crazyfordiamonds: glad to be here

crazyfordiamonds: I believe we will see the big money as we have talked about in here very soon

Warm Springs Rd: "very soon" ?

crazyfordiamonds: yes Warm Springs Rd: Yay ! ?

crazyfordiamonds: I know once the filing gets out the games will be over

crazyfordiamonds: As per Joel Katzman many investors with the big cash are afraid to invest in a pinkie stock so many of them have folded. In the case of CMKX it’s totally different they have assets

TBeezley1: Did Katzman SAY "they have assets."

TBeezley1: ?

TBeezley1: What an endorsement that would be...

crazyfordiamonds: He is including the land ownership,

TBeezley1: Right

TBeezley1: Sounds like he knows quite a bit about our little stock.

crazyfordiamonds: let me check and see if it's on our website

crazyfordiamonds: it actually aired last night on my show

crazyfordiamonds: that what I'm checking now

crazyfordiamonds: I was at work I did post it on RB

crazyfordiamonds: 01/19/05: One On One With Joel Katzman, the president and CEO of JPMorgan Alternative Asset Management Good Thing

crazyfordiamonds: SUSIE GHARIB: Hedge funds are one of the hottest investment trends. Their assets have doubled in the past five years to just under $1 trillion. That`s one reason the Securities and Exchange Commission is now scrutinizing hedge fund practices and requiring many managers to register with the agency for the first time ever as investment advisors.

crazyfordiamonds: Joel Katzman, the president and CEO of JPMorgan Alternative Asset Management, is one of the industry`s leaders. When he spoke with our Jeff Yastine earlier today, he said the growth of hedge funds is accelerating.

crazyfordiamonds: JOEL KATZMAN, PRESIDENT & CEO, JP MORGAN ALTERNATIVE ASSET MANAGEMENT: The big difference has been institutional interest in the asset class. When the markets went into a tailspin starting in 2000 and 2001,

crazyfordiamonds: you had a lot of institutions who observed that hedge funds managed to preserve capital and make small amounts of money in that time period and the feeling was that they are an attractive asset class for diversification. So it`s the incremental institutional interest that`s created the increased interest in the asset class.

crazyfordiamonds: JEFF YASTINE, NIGHTLY BUSINESS REPORT

CORRESPONDENT: The impression that a lot of people have in the public about hedge funds is that it`s a gun slinger, somebody who takes really big risks in an asset class like the stock market. Why would institutions be wanting to dip a toe in the hedge fund waters, so to speak?

crazyfordiamonds: KATZMAN: The actual fact is that a very, very small number of hedge funds fit the category that you just described. The overwhelming majority of hedge funds are looking to protect capital in down markets and in return for putting those hedges on, are generally willing to accept lower returns in very, very strong up markets. crazyfordiamonds: And as a result of that, you have a very, very attractive risk/return profile for investors looking to diversify away from traditional equity markets.

crazyfordiamonds: YASTINE: The SEC is taking its first step towards regulating hedge funds of a certain size and previously hedge funds really had very little regulation. How is this SEC oversight going over in the hedge fund community? What are managers saying about it?

crazyfordiamonds: KATZMAN: Well, any industry in the United States that hasn`t previously been regulated, that`s faced with regulation, is going to say that regulation is bad and it`s a really bad idea and it shouldn`t happen. The reality is two things. First, that I think in the long run,

crazyfordiamonds: requiring hedge funds to register will be in the interest of the industry. Secondly, I think that the concerns that the hedge funds have about the amount of burden that they`ll have to go through in complying with the regulations is overdone.

crazyfordiamonds: Some of the smaller hedge funds will obviously be burdened more than others. But at the end of the day, I think the concern is in excess of what`s really going to happen.

crazyfordiamonds: YASTINE: Could the fact that the SEC`s getting involved in looking over the hedge fund community, could that help in some ways to legitimize hedge funds as an asset class?

crazyfordiamonds: KATZMAN: That`s exactly why I think it`s good for the industry

crazyfordiamonds: YASTINE: Let`s talk about the perception, the image of hedge funds. It seems like usually the time that we all in the media write about it is when a hedge fund blows up and looses its investors` money. Is that an unfair image and has the industry sort of moved beyond that?


crazyfordiamonds: KATZMAN: It`s absolutely an unfair image. Again, generally speaking, the industry tends to be risk averse. Statistics have shown time and time again that hedge funds do a much better job of protecting capital in down markets than traditional funds do. And I believe that as you mentioned,

crazyfordiamonds: that reporters will latch on to things that are interesting to write about. I guess it`s no different than reading about all the planes that had accidents, as opposed to the ones that flew without any problem, whereas the incidence of that is very, very small. So the reality is hedge funds have gotten a much better name in the last few years as they`ve held up in down markets

crazyfordiamonds: YASTINE: Mr. Katzman, we`ll end it there then. Thank you very much

crazyfordiamonds: KATZMAN: Thank you.

crazyfordiamonds: YASTINE: Our guest Joel Katzman, president and CEO of JPMorgan Alternative Asset Management.

pontiyak: thanks crazy crazyfordiamonds: it's on our site www.nbr.com coach_6:

Posts: 2375 | Registered: Nov 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
legaleagle
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for legaleagle     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Reposted from ********s 32


swordfish168
Diamond Finder


member is offline


Posts: 65
KNOW YOUR FRIENDS !!! KNOW YOUR ENEMIES BETTER !!!
« Thread started on: Today at 10:09am »

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I see it coming !!! cant you feel it around you !!! cant you see the game being played on your minds !!!

A GROUP MIND F*CK SET UP JUST FOR ME AND YOU !!!!!

I have been on many boards since June. I am amazed at the amount of misinformation that is being relayed to investors through the various message boards. Especially now !!! more then ever before !!!

People saying I am not a BASHER but !!!
Here is my concern - REVERSE SPLIT !!! - we know this is not going to happen !!
Urban / Rendal selling to screw us over - we all know this is not going to happen !!

THEY START NEW THREADS AND THEN HAVE THEIR FRIENDS COME ON AND HELP BASH OR ATTACK THE OPTIMISTIC LISTERS.

THERE ARE MANY, MANY "PAID" BASHERS ALL AROUND US !!!

BASHER "SLEEPER CELLS" COMING INTO PLAY AT THIS TIME !!!

I HAVE NEVER SEEN MORE THEN AT THIS TIME !!!!!!!!!

they are HERE !!! they are THERE !!! THEY ARE EVERYWHERE !!!

They are sneaky and not as obvoius as before !!!
They PASS false hope !!
They makeup misleading information and dates !!
They twist the facts !!!

I am sure your first instinct is

this guy is just PARANOID !! OR DEAD WRONG !!!!!

IF YOU CANNOT SEE IT THEN I SUGGEST YOU DO MORE RESEARCH OR GET OUT NOW - ITS GOING TO GET UGLY IN THE NEAR FUTURE !!!!

WE ARE GETTING NEAR THE END AND THEY ARE DESPERATE !!! - They are losing and the attacks will get bigger and bolder as time goes on !!!

These are the ones that MAKE YOU DOUBT your previously UNSHAKEABLE RESOLVE INVOLVING CMKX !!! and its FUTURE UNLIMITED POTENTIAL !!!

the funny thing is -- I CAN SEE RIGHT THROUGH THEM !!!!!!!! -- I hope you can also !!!!!

since I have been involved all along and have kept up on my research they are all TRANSPARANT and it actually makes me feel stronger instead of weaker !!!

they are working very hard to get YOU to SELL !!!

BE LONG !!, BE STRONG !!, @@ BEST, MIKE @@ SWORDFISH168 @@

P.S. check out the posting by ORION (farther down). Is this a discruntled investor, basher or PAID BASHER.

THIS IS EXACTLY WHAT I WAS REFERRING TO ABOVE !!!

PLEASE TELL ME YOU CAN SEE WHAT I SEE !!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Posts: 2375 | Registered: Nov 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Wallace#1
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Wallace#1         Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
legaleagle,

I repeat your statement: "Anything written above, by me, is pure speculation or opinion except for facts which I may or may not back up. It is your responsibility to figure out if my "facts" are true or not. Do not buy or sell anything based on what I write."

Further, I remember someone "exactly" like you who didn't know the difference between a Record Date and an Effective Date. Seems to me he also misunderstood "public float" as well. Same person admitted he is a "novice", yet keeps coming on as though he's been in the market for years and years. If he has been in the market, it's the hog market and he's equivalent to having been in the pigpen stage. Guess he has to start somewhere! LOL

Enough said!!

Posts: 3607 | From: NJ - Outside Phila. | Registered: Mar 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Wallace#1
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Wallace#1         Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
legaleagle,

Re another of your reposts above:
"WE ARE GETTING NEAR THE END"

I repeat, "POSTMORTEM?"

Posts: 3607 | From: NJ - Outside Phila. | Registered: Mar 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
tryingtobeadaytrader
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for tryingtobeadaytrader     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
is cmkx dead? without having the time to read all of the posts, the ehading makes me worry, is all lost, if not,why start a thread like that??

--------------------
Trying To Be A Daytrader > TT Bad

Posts: 83 | From: Los Angeles | Registered: Dec 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Wallace#1
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Wallace#1         Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
tryingtobe,

Doesn't look good!

Posts: 3607 | From: NJ - Outside Phila. | Registered: Mar 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
tryingtobeadaytrader
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for tryingtobeadaytrader     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
should I move my sell order to 0.0001 from 0.0002, is that what you are saying?

thanks,

--------------------
Trying To Be A Daytrader > TT Bad

Posts: 83 | From: Los Angeles | Registered: Dec 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
will
Member


Icon 1 posted      Profile for will     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Form one of your copied repostings legal:

"I don't see how some people can come on here a spew the positive tall tales (a lot of which are just outright falsehoods) and look at themselves in the mirror. By being negative you put the responsibility of finding the positive on the individual. By being only positive you create a false sense of security.
Some things said on this board have been extreme in both direction but the rampant pumping is shameful.
I thought this board was created to dicuss the pro's and con's of trading CMKX shares. I guess I was wrong."

It appears there isn't a lot "pro" things left to say. I would rather err on the side of common sense and caution, then create a false sense of security regarding this company. You may very well take the position that you are not pumping this stock, but even a casual observer would say you support it and are high on a psoitive outcome. I on the other hand don't have the faith you have in these folks. If you call me a basher, so-be-it, I like to think I'm a doubter that is grounded in reality, not creating a false sense of security. I don't really care what anyone buys, it's their money. They might look at it as the smartest thing they ever did one day, or it may go to their penny stock tuition bill, either way it's their money.

--------------------
A million seconds is 13 days.
A billion seconds is 31 years.

Posts: 4893 | From: Burbank IL USA | Registered: Feb 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
will
Member


Icon 1 posted      Profile for will     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
How long have you had your sell order for .0002 in? I assume it hasn't filled, not even partially filled?

quote:
Originally posted by tryingtobeadaytrader:
should I move my sell order to 0.0001 from 0.0002, is that what you are saying?

thanks,



--------------------
A million seconds is 13 days.
A billion seconds is 31 years.

Posts: 4893 | From: Burbank IL USA | Registered: Feb 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
tryingtobeadaytrader
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for tryingtobeadaytrader     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
I have had it in at .0002 for about a month with nothing, not even a partial fill. I may bring it down to .0001 Monday.

Thanks for any input you all may have,

quote:
Originally posted by will:
How long have you had your sell order for .0002 in? I assume it hasn't filled, not even partially filled?

quote:
Originally posted by tryingtobeadaytrader:
should I move my sell order to 0.0001 from 0.0002, is that what you are saying?

thanks,




--------------------
Trying To Be A Daytrader > TT Bad

Posts: 83 | From: Los Angeles | Registered: Dec 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
will
Member


Icon 1 posted      Profile for will     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
.and you purchased CMKX at .0001 or higher? Which?

quote:
Originally posted by tryingtobeadaytrader:
I have had it in at .0002 for about a month with nothing, not even a partial fill. I may bring it down to .0001 Monday.

Thanks for any input you all may have,

quote:
Originally posted by will:
How long have you had your sell order for .0002 in? I assume it hasn't filled, not even partially filled?

quote:
Originally posted by tryingtobeadaytrader:
should I move my sell order to 0.0001 from 0.0002, is that what you are saying?

thanks,





--------------------
A million seconds is 13 days.
A billion seconds is 31 years.

Posts: 4893 | From: Burbank IL USA | Registered: Feb 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Wallace#1
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Wallace#1         Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
TT Bad,

Tough question, and one you will have to answer for yourself.

Many have been trying to sell at .0002 for months and cannot. I don't know if you can sell at .0001 either, but it's more likely.

If I owned CMKX for anything over .0003, I'd probably hold, since I cannot lose much more unless they go belly up. If owned at .0003 or .0002, I'd probably sell and take my lumps....and get back at least 1/3 or 1/2 of what I had in it.

If you are above the .0003, I wouldn't recommend buying any more to try to average down....that, I think, would result a bigger loss.

Bear in mind, that I think CMKX a losing proposition and have thought so for some time now. Do what you will if you think otherwise. Bottom line is, it is your money and your decision.

I wish you could see all the posts, both pro and con with reference to CMKX and weigh your decision based upon all the facts at hand. My opinion.....the scales are tipped far and away from CMKX accomplishing anything worthwhile.

Posts: 3607 | From: NJ - Outside Phila. | Registered: Mar 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Wallace#1
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Wallace#1         Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Wallace#1:
TT Bad,

Tough question, and one you will have to answer for yourself.

Many have been trying to sell at .0002 for months and cannot. I don't know if you can sell at .0001 either, but it's more likely.

If I owned CMKX for anything over .0003, I'd probably hold, since I cannot lose much more unless they go belly up. If owned at .0003 or .0002, I'd probably sell and take my lumps....and get back at least 1/3 or 1/2 of what I had in it.

If you are above the .0003, I wouldn't recommend buying any more to try to average down....that, I think, would result a bigger loss.

Bear in mind, that I think CMKX a losing proposition and have thought so for some time now. Do what you will if you think otherwise. Bottom line is, it is your money and your decision.

I wish you could see all the posts, both pro and con with reference to CMKX and weigh your decision based upon all the facts at hand. My opinion.....the scales are tipped far and away from CMKX accomplishing anything worthwhile.

Anticipating Will's comment re above, if you purchased at .0001, hold. Cannot lose much more unless you bought one hell of a lot of CMKX.
Posts: 3607 | From: NJ - Outside Phila. | Registered: Mar 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Wallace#1
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Wallace#1         Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Will - check your PM
Posts: 3607 | From: NJ - Outside Phila. | Registered: Mar 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
legaleagle
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for legaleagle     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by tryingtobeadaytrader:
should I move my sell order to 0.0001 from 0.0002, is that what you are saying?

thanks,

Trying, last weeks trade volume @ .0002 = # Shares: 3,639,872,268

Wouldn't you think your sale could have been caught up within 3.6 billion shares traded at your price. And that's just last week. Doesn't that tell you that the market isn't trading normally. And that doesn't the include the tens of billions of shares traded since you placed your sell order. Did you see the billion shares that sold at .0009 on Thursday, and were never reversed. That was a real sale. I wonder why that buyer didn't want yours at .0002?

The market on CMKX is being heavily manipulated by the MM's. That is apparent and it is fact, or your shares would have sold. Sure you don't want to stick around and see what's going to happen next?

IMO

Posts: 2375 | Registered: Nov 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Ric
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Ric     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Thats an incorrect statemet. .0002 for one thing is a rounded up number. Because the mm's trade in the 5th digit anything over .0001X is rounded to .0002. Second thing is thats the ask price. What the MM's are selling at. Thats not the bid which has run anywhere from .0001 and down. CMKX has way to many shares for MM's to worry about the need for manipulation. Thats only speculation that is use by the long to give them hope. But still. bid and ask are two differnt numbers. Al the .0002 were sell last week not buys.

Ric

--------------------
Invest with your brain not with your heart.

Posts: 4405 | From: Bristol, Tn, USA | Registered: Aug 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
legaleagle
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for legaleagle     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
"Anything written above, by me, is pure speculation or opinion except for facts which I may or may not back up. It is your responsibility to figure out if my "facts" are true or not. Do not buy or sell anything based on what I write."


Wallace#1, you stated that I posted this. Would you like to check on that? I believe those were the words of George Burns in a repost. You really should do your research a little more thoroughly.

Posts: 2375 | Registered: Nov 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
legaleagle
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for legaleagle     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Ric:
Thats an incorrect statemet. .0002 for one thing is a rounded up number. Because the mm's trade in the 5th digit anything over .0001X is rounded to .0002. Second thing is thats the ask price. What the MM's are selling at. Thats not the bid which has run anywhere from .0001 and down. CMKX has way to many shares for MM's to worry about the need for manipulation. Thats only speculation that is use by the long to give them hope. But still. bid and ask are two differnt numbers. Al the .0002 were sell last week not buys.

Ric

Ric, can you explain the billion at .0009?
Posts: 2375 | Registered: Nov 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
legaleagle
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for legaleagle     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
NEW GREEN BARON REPORT


Friday, January 21, 2005

December 2004 Home Page Stock Update

Nicodrops, Inc. (NCDP)

www.Nicodrops.com

On December 9, 2004, The Green Baron Report upgraded its coverage of Nicodrops from a Stock to Watch to a fully profiled stock for our storied home page. NCDP had all the makings of an under followed company and unnoticed stock with a potential blockbuster new product. The hire of a seasoned new director of sales gave us reason to raise our attention level, and within a week later NCDP hit a high that was 100% above our profile price.

An uneventful holiday season and the lack of more new product distribution contracts caused NCDP to give back much of the gains it saw in December. However, trading the past two days seems to dictate a new level of hope and interest to NCDP as the stock has rallied back to close at .018 per share, just above our original home page profile price.

The Green Baron Report has learned from sources that Nicodrops is planning to attack many new channels of distribution, and that production is increasing. It appears the Company was not originally prepared to meet the high demand from other interested stores following its announcement last month with CVS Pharmacies going into the New Year. However, we understand the Company is now ready to handle new order flow.

Although we were hopeful that Nicodrops could deliver to all interested large chain stores, we understand the challenges that come when a small company launches a fantastic new product into the marketplace. The Green Baron Report remains very optimistic in the future of Nicodrops smoking cessation lozenges, and the success of the company will be measured by how well they manage delivery of these high margin products. We have suggested that Nicodrops, Inc. needs a few more experienced professionals to join its management team so that deliveries of its products never come into question. We have been told this will not be a problem in the future.

About Nicrodrops

Nicodrops, Inc. was incorporated for the purpose of bringing to market a unique, drug free line of lozenge products designed to help people who wish to stop smoking. The Company has developed its smoking cessation product over a ten-year period. With the completion of the product development, Nicodrops is now positioned to capitalize on the research and development activities by introducing their products to the market place.

Unlike its competitors, the product is drug free, acts faster and is less expensive. The product also assists those who wish to stop smoking without using the nicotine weaning process included in competing products. Introducing the drug-based products into the blood stream only heightens the risk of a heart attack if a person decides go back to smoking again. Nicodrops is a much safer and better product because it is drug-free and requires a much shorter time to show tangible results (less than 4 weeks compared to the drug based products that are 12 weeks or longer. Nicodrops lozenge is a no non-sense straightforward approach to begin a stop smoking program without using nicotine right from the onset. It will also assist smokers who cannot smoke during business hours. Nicodrops is a smoker's best ally in a smoker-unfriendly environment. It just might convert a smoker --- somewhat inadvertently perhaps --- into a non-smoker.

December Focus Stock Update

TelePlus Enterprises (BB: TLPE)

www.Teleplus.ca


TelePlus Reports Preliminary Q4 Revenues Up 52% to $4.2M USD; Annual Revenues Up 62% to $12.4M USD


TelePlus to Access up to 700 Points of Distribution through Nation Wide Distribution Agreement with Mr. Prepaid; More Beneficial than Acquisition

The Green Baron Report initiated coverage of TelePlus (TLPE) on November 30, 2004 at .34 per share as our December Focus Stock. The following day, TelePlus stock hit .50 per share and traded record volume of nearly 2.8 million shares. Fantastic news announced on Tuesday, January 18 and Thursday, January 20 went largely unnoticed. We maintain that yesterday’s close of .355 per share is an extremely attractive level for accumulation based on conservative sales and earnings projections.

So far TelePlus has not yet turned out to be the “January Effect” stock that we originally had hoped, but it remains above solid support. Ongoing discussions with the TLPE IR contact at (866)699-3388 have convinced us that the Company has turned the ship around and is headed into smooth waters. Technically, we believe a move over .40 per share will likely take TLPE shares much higher.

We invite our members to read the recent press releases below if you have not done so already. It is obvious to us that TelePlus has the shareholders best interests in mind particularly by working a deal with Mr. Prepaid that would give the Company much of what it wanted without any dilution. The Green Baron Report believes a strong move higher will come as the Company executes on its business plans that were revealed over the last few months.

On January 18, 2005, TelePlus Enterprises, Inc., which owns and operates 39 TelePlus branded stores in major shopping malls selling a variety of wireless and portable communication devices, announced that its subsidiary, TelePlus Wireless Corp. ("TelePlus Wireless"), signed a distribution agreement with Mr. Prepaid, of Baltimore. The agreement calls for Mr. Prepaid to immediately start the distribution of TelePlus' wireless phone services on the US East Coast through its network of greater than 700 retail points of distribution.

DISTRIBUTION AGREEMENT MORE BENEFICIAL THAN ACQUISITION

TelePlus had previously announced, on October 13, 2004, that it had signed a Letter of Intent ("LOI") to acquire Mr. Prepaid. After conducting a thorough due diligence review of Mr. Prepaid, the Company and its strategic advisors have decided the prudent decision is to not proceed with the acquisition. Rather, it was decided that a network wide distribution agreement would be more beneficial at this time, the details of which are as follows:

Shareholder Dilution -- TelePlus and its strategic advisors determined that a network wide distribution agreement would reap substantially the same benefit to the Company without creating any dilution for shareholders.

Focus On Core Competency -- Our due diligence process indicated that an acquisition of Mr. Prepaid would require significant attention and resources towards initiatives that did not involve our core competency and would divert management from its plan to establish TelePlus as a significant participant within our industry.

Highest and Best Use of Company Resources -- It was determined that use of TelePlus cash and human resources would generate a far greater return on investment if aimed towards developing a national distribution network, as opposed to the narrower geographical reach of Mr. Prepaid.

Capitalizing on Focused Opportunities -- TelePlus has and will have the opportunity to take advantage of business opportunities that are focused on our core industry strengths. As such, it was determined that capitalizing on such opportunities would yield greater returns on investment and equity than any acquisition of Mr. Prepaid could.

Marius Silvasan, CEO of TelePlus Enterprises, stated, "We are pleased to add Mr. Prepaid as one of our distributors for the TelePlus Wireless product line. Mr. Prepaid currently services a large network of retailers on the East Coast of the United States, providing great opportunities to increase our top and bottom lines. We determined, following a strategic review, that it would be in the best interests of our Company and its shareholders to use our financial resources in assisting key distributors such as Mr. Prepaid to promote our wireless service to retailers across the United States, as opposed to proceeding with the acquisition of Mr. Prepaid. With this in mind, we proceeded to establish the distribution agreement with Mr. Prepaid announced today and look forward to yielding great results for TelePlus."

Mr. Prepaid currently supplies a variety of wireless phones, related accessories and wireless and long distance vouchers to over 700 retail points of distribution.

Yesterday, January 20, 2005, TelePlus Enterprises, Inc., reported that preliminary fourth quarter results came in very strong and reflect a 52% gain over the same period last year. It is anticipated that these preliminary fourth quarter results will help to establish a new 12-month record with revenues of $12.4M USD, an increase of 62% over the previous year.

TelePlus is further pleased to announce that the company anticipates positive EBITDA in the fourth quarter of 2004.

"Our fourth quarter and full year results reflect a strong performance by our Company as we continue to execute our business plan," stated company CEO Marius Silvasan. "The new year will see an even stronger company that will take advantage of various opportunities to continue expansion while delivering value to our shareholders," said Mr. Silvasan. "The first quarter of 2005 will see the closure of our acquisitions, TelePlus Connect (Previously Keda Consulting) and Freedom phone lines. The closing of the transaction is set for March. Such acquisitions which will continue to increase top line revenues while immediately making a favorable impact to our bottom line," added Silvasan.

August Focus Stock Update

CMKM Diamonds Inc. (PK: CMKX)

The Green Baron Report is hoping there will be more to report in the near future regarding CMKM Diamonds. The buzz on the street indicates that the “quiet period” may soon be coming to an end, and the Company may finally reveal some of what we have expected all along … that some of its nearly 2 million acres in mineral claims may actually contain some minerals. Even if news about what is in the ground does not come, a long awaited filing from the Company that indicates a tighter share structure would be just as sweet.

Prior to its first record date for a dividend distribution in August 2004, The Green Baron Report suggested that its members may want to accumulate CMKX for speculative accounts to take advantage of stock dividend distributions, possible high valuation news, and even the chance of a squeeze on its shares. The Green Baron Report stood alone as the only widely distributed newsletter to support CMKX as critics and nay-sayers strangely lined up to bad mouth this low priced equity. Under intense criticism and doubt, our newsletter has never wavered from our original opinion that this company will likely be “The Stock Play of a Lifetime”.

Perhaps we will soon see who was right, and who was so very wrong.

Posts: 2375 | Registered: Nov 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Wallace#1
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Wallace#1         Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
"Anything written above, by me, is pure speculation or opinion except for facts which I may or may not back up. It is your responsibility to figure out if my "facts" are true or not. Do not buy or sell anything based on what I write."

No problem, legaleagle. The same applies to all of your posts and "reposts". Mirror image.
Everyone knows that sure sounds like you. Your signature is all over it.

Posts: 3607 | From: NJ - Outside Phila. | Registered: Mar 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Wallace#1
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Wallace#1         Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Hey legaleagle,

How soon will you be connecting the company in your last repost of the Green Baron to CMKX and some unfounded level of potential?

Posts: 3607 | From: NJ - Outside Phila. | Registered: Mar 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
legaleagle
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for legaleagle     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Wallace#1:
"Anything written above, by me, is pure speculation or opinion except for facts which I may or may not back up. It is your responsibility to figure out if my "facts" are true or not. Do not buy or sell anything based on what I write."

No problem, legaleagle. The same applies to all of your posts and "reposts". Mirror image.
Everyone knows that sure sounds like you. Your signature is all over it.

Well, I really apprecitate that Wallace#1, you should stop by PB 32 sometime and see who George Burns is. George is one of the most respected and intelligen posters on that board. He is an expert statistician and researcher. I appreciate the compliment.
Posts: 2375 | Registered: Nov 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
legaleagle
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for legaleagle     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Wallace#1:
Hey legaleagle,

How soon will you be connecting the company in your last repost of the Green Baron to CMKX and some unfounded level of potential?

Come on Wallace#1, you really must keep up. Check the last three paragraphs of GB concerning CMKX.
Posts: 2375 | Registered: Nov 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
legaleagle
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for legaleagle     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
REPOST from 32. This is what DD backed opinion looks like.


digby
Drill Site Evaluation
« Thread started on: Today at 5:54pm »

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I have been reviewing all the old PR's, reading up on diamond mining in gerneral as well as kimberlites as a whole.

Historic reviews show 1% of kimberlite pipes have diamonds in significant amounts. Most of these diamond bearing 1% tend to occur with a grouping associated with an area having a common volcanic history. 80% of Saskatchewans' kimberlite pipes are diamondiferous. 50% contain diamonds over one millimeter in size.

We (CMKX) have 151 anomalies (PR 17 September, 2003) in the area, surrounding and immediately adjacent to DeBeers’ mines. 5 of these have been deemed “high priority targets” for immediate drilling. The percentages indicate that 120 of these anomalies should be diamondiferous. 75 of them should produce diamonds over one millimeter in size. At least two of the 5 high priority targets should immediately show diamonds.

We have been drilling since March, 2004 (PR 15 March 2004). The kimberlite strata that other companies in the area have sampled tend to be approximately 15 meters thick. Ours tested out more than 50 meters thick (hole one per the PR’s). This drilling must have produced something before June 2004 when it was announced that we were retaining the services of Roger Glenn.

Based upon the PR's and the rate at which drilling can be accomplished (stated in PR's), we have most likely finished sample drilling on the first 3-5 sites. The likelihood is that we have at least two proven sites documented. These are in the neighborhood of DeBeers claims, thus are probably from the same or similar volcanic flows. This places our claim’s values at $40 - $80 Billion each.

The likelihood is that if only half of the 75 possibly diamondiferous anomalies end up being in this $40 - $80 Billion range, we have the potential of 37 diamond mines X $40 Billion = $1.48 Trillion. The provable assets of $80 - $160 Billion at time of filing, along with the valuation of our JV’s and the possible gold, uranium and other minerals that we have been getting rumors of, could and should be the short-term firm basis for our shares to run on. The short-squeeze, if any, is just icing on the cake.

Once we get a firm share structure from the filing (which must occur by 1 May per law), we should be confident in at least 50% of this value per share being translated to the price per share within one to two months.

Several of our clan that have been estimating that we could possibly run to between $1-$2 within days of our filing. This may be underestimating our potential. I feel it would be foolish to allow any group to part us from our shares at anything less than the value determined by the above formulae. Please don’t make the mistake of selling all your shares in the short-term. The long-term potential for this company is enormous and exciting.

I expect harsh criticisim of these statements, but I'm big enough to take whatever is dished out. Thanks for your time.

Posts: 2375 | Registered: Nov 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Vinny
Member


Member Rated:
5
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Vinny     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Anyone who claims to be selling at .0001 is either full of chit or really really stupid...GLTA
Posts: 146 | Registered: Feb 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
bill1352
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for bill1352     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
you can sell at .0001 & you can buy at .0001 & will be able to for months to come. this is a lottery ticket, odds are a bit greater then a lottery ticket but... what ppl don't seem to understand is to pay a dividend you have to send it all thru the SEC. now if you tell the SEC that the split is to 779 billion shares there had better be 779 billion shares. but of course the how many shares your splitting comes in again only cmkx & the SEC knows for sure. but 1 thing is sure the SEC has a number to use for SHO from the dividends & even if SHO isn't much help know CMKX does not qualify for the SHO list according to the SEC. notice USCA was on the list. their short has been filled.

--------------------
"keep your stick on the ice & your cup firmly in place"

Posts: 3651 | From: Algonac, MI. 48001 | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
legaleagle
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for legaleagle     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
bill1352, you keep assuming that the OS is 779 billion shares, based on the ratios assigned for dividend distribution. The ratios used were set by the OTCBB. There is no evidence that CMKX provided those numbers. The OTCBB could have used numbers supplied by the DTCC and SEC, showing the number of shares sold through the system. Can you see that if there is a naked short situtation in CMKX, that this was the perfect trap. CMKX would not have known how many shares were naked shorted, only how many were legitimately issued. So by placing the UCAD divy of 7,500,000 shares, with the OTCBB, CMKX was able to determine and prove how many shares had been naked shorted, by forcing the OTCBB to inquire of the true amount of total shares sold through the DTCC in order to make the distribution. The total number of shares reported by OTCBB via the calculations may have been 779 billion. But if Roger knew the true OS should have only been say, 125 billion and the distribution was to the 779 billion, then he had the MM's trapped. At this point he would complain to the OTCBB, the DTCC, and the SEC that the distribution was too extensive. This would force the brokerages to have to issue "markers" until the dispute was settled. Which they did. If there had been no problem, the distribution would have proceeded without the necessity to issue these "markers". It is the resolution of this situation which is causing the delays, but it will also be the engine that generates profit for shareholders as the MM's are forced to buy back the NSS in CMKX.

And SHO is too messed up to use to determine anything about the NS system.

Posts: 2375 | Registered: Nov 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
bill1352
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for bill1352     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
legal...you should call your broker & ask how dividend stock splits are determined. i did. the split number comes from the paying stocks t/a, cmkx's t/a. this number is reported then to the SEC as it is considered public information & must be true. you can't lie about the number. the otc does not determine the split. cmkx does & they better not be lying to any governing bodies.

--------------------
"keep your stick on the ice & your cup firmly in place"

Posts: 3651 | From: Algonac, MI. 48001 | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
TruthTeller
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for TruthTeller     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Nobody is reposting Zen's posts since he became a basher [Smile] . This one is funny

Posted by: zeninvestor32
In reply to: None Date:1/22/2005 4:34:54 PM
Post #of 27746

MY CONVERSATION WITH ANDY HILL

I had a very pleasant conversation with Mr. Hill this morning. I felt it was very insightful and thought I would share the information I gathered.

I first asked how Andy was doing. He replied "fine". I can only interpret that to mean that a filing will occur next week. I next asked how he was enjoying his new responsibilities as our IR person. He replied "Quite well actually, thank you." Although that may seem to be unimportant it was the WAY in which he said "thank you" that leads me to conclusively establish that Roger must have completed the final audit this weekend and has submitted it to Urban for his final approval. After that, I asked if he had spoken to Urban lately and he answered "Yes, I've spoken to him a few times this week." I think this is EXCELLENT news. The fact that Andy is speaking at all to Urban tells me that the OS must be between 5 and 6.7 billion shares now. I thanked him for his time and he said "You're welcome" and it was as if he was going to say something more but just stopped. It was at that point that I realized exactly what he was about to say but did not -- that there would be a PR on Thursday detailing all of our core sample results to date. I mean what else could it have been?? That HAD to be what he was going to say and he just felt he couldn't. I said "goodbye" and he said "bye". But I could tell by saying "bye" and not "goodbye" or "byebye" that Andy was signaling to me that the threat of DeBeers has been remedied by Roger and that a deal has obviously been struck with the MMs through the SEC to begin the forced cover. As you can see, it was a VERY revealing conversation and I thank Mr. Hill for saying all he could without actually saying it.

For those that have not yet gotten it, the above is a complete joke (but sadly is not far off from what a lot of people seem to be doing with respect to Andy). Hope you got a chuckle out of it and hope that nobody REALLY has any expectations for a timeline in the near future. If anything happens in the next month, I'll be thrilled. If it takes longer, I will not be disappointed and will simply continue to hold until the final resolution comes through. Between the Denver race, the other races, the halloween party, the dividend dates, the december dates, the SHO dates, and on and on and on, I find it hard to believe that anybody is STILL insisting that they "know" or even "truly believe" we will see a filing by any particular date (and for the record, Andy has no actual timeline on anything, despite what others have posted). Good luck to everyone. What a crazy ride and, at some point this year, I hope will be even crazier. [Smile]

Second disclaimer: Because god knows SOMEONE out there will STILL think I actually had the above conversation with Andy, let me make this idiot-proof. I did not have the above conversation with Andy and it is a complete spoof of the other posts that seem to be reading way too much into every word spoken by Andy and practically ensuring that soon Andy will be limited to responding "no comment" to just about every question. LOL


Z

Posts: 264 | From: ATL | Registered: May 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
legaleagle
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for legaleagle     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by bill1352:
legal...you should call your broker & ask how dividend stock splits are determined. i did. the split number comes from the paying stocks t/a, cmkx's t/a. this number is reported then to the SEC as it is considered public information & must be true. you can't lie about the number. the otc does not determine the split. cmkx does & they better not be lying to any governing bodies.

Bill, check the PR's Urban specifically stated that he wanted "all shareholders" to receive the dividend. That number didn't match the TA numbers, so it had to be determined by examining all shares sold.

[ January 23, 2005, 10:33: Message edited by: legaleagle ]

Posts: 2375 | Registered: Nov 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
will
Member


Icon 1 posted      Profile for will     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Truth, I enjoyed it. Thanks for psoting it. I especially enjoyed this part:
"Between the Denver race, the other races, the halloween party, the dividend dates, the december dates, the SHO dates, and on and on and on, I find it hard to believe that anybody is STILL insisting that they "know" or even "truly believe" we will see a filing by any particular date (and for the record, Andy has no actual timeline on anything, despite what others have posted)."
He's 100% right it's a new "what if" with an event or date attached to it that comes and goes without anything materializing, so it's on to the next grand scheme. These poor dillusional people that really believe this thing is shorted, and will be covered through a negotiated settlement between CMKX, SEC, DTC, MM's, are just being unreal. None of the above angencies could give a crap about CMKX's situation, which is the insane amount of O/S, not a shorting problem.

--------------------
A million seconds is 13 days.
A billion seconds is 31 years.

Posts: 4893 | From: Burbank IL USA | Registered: Feb 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
legaleagle
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for legaleagle     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
The post below was written by Coreton (from RB?), who figures CMKX valuation to be .0009 based on the 10QSB.

Does his .0009 calculation have any connection with the .0009 block trades we witnessed this past Thursday?

---------------------------------------------------------------

First the valuation from CMKX shown on the 10QSB is $33,750,000 in stock for 5% and $13,500,000 in cash for 9% for a total asset valuation of $47,250,000 for 14% of CMKX claims. this Means we need to find out how much of USCAs pps is represented by CMKX claims. We have the total Evaluation for USCA of 73,834,515 from the 10QSB. This represents 100% of the valuation for USCA since there are no other assets or revenues at this time.

Now we can figure what percentage of USCAs pps is represented by CMKX claims by Dividing 47,250,000 by 73,834,515

47,250,000/73,834,515 = .634

Now we can take the current pps of USCA and multiply by this number to find out how much of USCAs pps is reflective of the CMKX claims.

USCA closing price on 11/18/2004 was $3.00

$3.00 x .634 = $1.902

This means that of the $3.00 pps of USCA the market has valued the CMKX claims at $1.902 for USCA.

Mow we must convert the 63+ million shares of USCA to the 779+billion shares of CMKX to get a ratio to figure the pps of CMKX if it is traded with the exact same principles as USCA is today.

we can get this number doing this equation. OS of usca 63,603,066 (from the 10QSB) Divided by the calculated OS of CMKX using the reverse math widely excepted for the UCAD div 7,500,000/.00000962 which is 779,625,779,625 OS for CMKX

63,603,066/779625,779,625 = .0000816 ratio

Now we can figure the pps target for CMKX based on these two number if CMKX only held 14% of it's claims

$1.902 x .0000816 = $0.0001552

So the PPS for cmkx would be $0.0001552 if CMKX only held 14% of the claims.

However CMKX holds 81% of it's claims remember USCA has 14% and SGGM holds 5%. So how much more does CMKX hold that USCA? Simple 81% divided by 14% will give you the ratio of CMKX to USCA...

81/14 = 5.7857

This means that CMKX holds 5.7857 times more claims than USCA. so now we get the true valuation as set by the market and the currently accepted accounting practices in the United States. $0.0001552 x 5.7857= $0.0008979

So in a nut shell the market has given us a snap shot of where CMKX should be trading RIGHT now as of today. That pps is $0.0009.


Now we must also remember that the Mine in Ecuador came on line after the 9/30/2004 filing date and so did CMKX acquisition of the Uranium claim in northern Sask. so there are things that have happened since the date for the 10QSB filing period that are not included in the original valuation.

I think it is very plain to see why UC RG ED RW were all saying we should drop a Zero by the Party. IMO the 10QSB was submitted around the 26th of October and the tremendous jump in valuation caused the Suspension of USCA and delayed the filing till now. This 10QSB clearly shows that based on today's accepted accounting practices and the current market value placed on such accounting practices, should have CMKX trading today at .0009 or higher.

The Numbers above with the exception of the OS for CMKX are all in the 10QSB the ONLY figure in question would be what we think the OS for CMKX is therefore I will say that this is a realistic view of where CMKXs pps should be at this point and time. Clearly .0002 is well below the expected pps under current conditions.

Coreton

Posts: 2375 | Registered: Nov 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Wallace#1
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Wallace#1         Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
legaleagle,

Bill1352 is right concerning who sets the ratios on dividends. Neither OTCBB, NASDAQ, Amex nor the NYSE have anything to do with that ratio. And, remember, as you once mistakenly said, it is not 1 to 1.

Where do you come up with all that gobbledegook, such as you posted above? Why do you insist upon dwelling in la la land?

Posts: 3607 | From: NJ - Outside Phila. | Registered: Mar 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
  This topic comprises 35 pages: 1  2  3  4  5  ...  33  34  35   

Quick Reply
Message:

HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.

Instant Graemlins
   


Post New Topic  New Poll  Post A Reply Close Topic   Feature Topic   Move Topic   Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:


Contact Us | Allstocks.com Message Board Home

© 1997 - 2021 Allstocks.com. All rights reserved.

Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classic™ 6.7.2

Share