quote:Originally posted by justplayin: Doc, Your opinion does count, but the fact is that you only have speculation like the rest of us. You are so headstrong and may discourage some that may wish to buy this stock. This is bad for all of our positions.
And don't say you just want to warn possible new investors 'cuz that was already debated in the other thread. The concensus was that those "warning" were bashers.
I just don't want anybody to call you a "basher"
P.S. I really do like you Doc, just want to keep things clear. GLTY
So you would have me say nothing and let other people buy this stock, is that what I am hearing The people in the other thread admitted that they had no shares, they just had other motives. So you think that we should lead others to our current faith. Lets not put up a sign indicating that the bridge is washed out, just let them fall, NO THANKS.
-------------------- Be Careful Of The Toes We Step On Today, They Could Be Attached To The Butt We Have To Kiss Tomorrow Posts: 4727 | From: Elk Grove ( Sacramento )CA USA | Registered: Jun 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
So, then you admit that you are a "basher"? I don't think that is the case.
I can't prove there will be no R/S and you can't prove there won't.
Alot of BIG companies have mineral claims in the same and surrounding areas as CMKX. Those companies are doing exploration. There may be potential here.
Flat out saying CMKX is a "SCAM" is opinion and not fact.
Back up your statements when you say something, or else you really say nothing.
-------------------- A day without dreams is just a nightmare! Posts: 1702 | From: Michigan | Registered: Oct 2003
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by justplayin: So, then you admit that you are a "basher"? I don't think that is the case.
I can't prove there will be no R/S and you can't prove there won't.
Alot of BIG companies have mineral claims in the same and surrounding areas as CMKX. Those companies are doing exploration. There may be potential here.
Flat out saying CMKX is a "SCAM" is opinion and not fact.
Back up your statements when you say something, or else you really say nothing.
So you would have me say nothing and let other people buy this stock, is that what I am hearing The people in the other thread admitted that they had no shares, they just had other motives. So you think that we should lead others to our current faith. Lets not put up a sign indicating that the bridge is washed out, just let them fall, NO THANKS.
-------------------- "If We Agree To Disagree, Then We Will Remain Friends"
-------------------- Be Careful Of The Toes We Step On Today, They Could Be Attached To The Butt We Have To Kiss Tomorrow Posts: 4727 | From: Elk Grove ( Sacramento )CA USA | Registered: Jun 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
why can't ppl that think that certain stocks are scam just keep it to them self... crap! why shuv it down out throats????? grow up
Posts: 976 | Registered: Jan 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
Doc, you are wrong. Only some admitted they had no shares. Others said they did have shares.
What's your point! Just because I don't own a car means that I can't put up a sign of a washed out bridge?
Pinks are just a HIGHLY prospective gamble. ALL pinks! People will only learn through their mistakes. If the people in pinks don't know the risks, they are not educated in the risks of pinks.
Would a blind man read the "bridge out" sign?
-------------------- A day without dreams is just a nightmare! Posts: 1702 | From: Michigan | Registered: Oct 2003
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by justplayin: Doc, you are wrong. Only some admitted they had no shares. Others said they did have shares.
What's your point! Just because I don't own a car means that I can't put up a sign of a washed out bridge?
Pinks are just a HIGHLY prospective gamble. ALL pinks! People will only learn through their mistakes. If the people in pinks don't know the risks, they are not educated in the risks of pinks.
Would a blind man read the "bridge out" sign?
So now we take advantage of the blind, put up a talking sign
-------------------- Be Careful Of The Toes We Step On Today, They Could Be Attached To The Butt We Have To Kiss Tomorrow Posts: 4727 | From: Elk Grove ( Sacramento )CA USA | Registered: Jun 2004
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by bousbous55: why can't ppl that think that certain stocks are scam just keep it to them self... crap! why shuv it down out throats????? grow up
You are right. This is crap, people come to this board to get opinions, either for or against this stock. It was those positive remarks that got me hooked, no one every questioned the stock.
But I respect your opinion.
-------------------- Be Careful Of The Toes We Step On Today, They Could Be Attached To The Butt We Have To Kiss Tomorrow Posts: 4727 | From: Elk Grove ( Sacramento )CA USA | Registered: Jun 2004
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by legaleagle: Doc, please don't quote me unless I say it or post it.
"Just for you: "Oh Yeah Legal Told Me To Tell You That This POS Is Going To Pay You Big Time: NOT"
Should that not apply to you, when you say Andy said
-------------------- Be Careful Of The Toes We Step On Today, They Could Be Attached To The Butt We Have To Kiss Tomorrow Posts: 4727 | From: Elk Grove ( Sacramento )CA USA | Registered: Jun 2004
| IP: Logged |
quote:why can't ppl that think that certain stocks are scam just keep it to them self... crap! why shuv it down out throats????? grow up
I'll answer it this way bousbous. About a week or so ago you came on this thread and posed the question "how does this stock work?". Whether or not you read the responses is irrelevant but the point is that you were undecided about buying this stock, right? Now, if you had come on here and read nothing but glowing posts about how wonderful this stock is you probably would have bought it in a heartbeat without even realizing that this is at best a huge gamble and yes, could be an outright scam. Is that really the way it should be? The sentiment these days seems to be running against people that try to warn new investors about the potential pitfalls of a stock and that just doesn't make sense to me. I realize that we're all adults and responsible for our own decisions but if I'm looking into a stock and know nothing about it, I'll take any handout that anyone is offering to give me, positive or negative.
Posts: 5729 | From: Wisconsin | Registered: Sep 2003
| IP: Logged |
posted
wow just in from work & see cmkx filed something & it just warms my heart to feel all the love it caused in this thread....NOT....lol. this is a almost meaning less filing. it does mean that they have figured things out up to the date July 22, 2003 & that is was screwed up then. they filed then thinking there were less then 500 shareholders & they were wrong. notice there is no mention of how many shares were out over 1 1/2 yrs ago. of course the cult wants to believe it was roger the dodger that was behind this, i'm more inclined to believe it was mahoo & his team of lawyers but who knows or for that matter cares...lol. if they are required to file in 60 days i'd say its about 70 days left to the r/s. if the o/s isn't 779 billion then they have some explaining to do concerning the dividend splits. either way it might be getting close to the s**t hitting the fan time
-------------------- "keep your stick on the ice & your cup firmly in place" Posts: 3651 | From: Algonac, MI. 48001 | Registered: Jun 2004
| IP: Logged |
Rate Member posted February 17, 2005 15:27 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- how long does it usually take to get shares filed with cmkx
==============================================
shares filed or shares flushed??? cmkx does not want to file. my guess is roger quit when his computer cryed mercy after trying to feed in all the o/s. i bet it started smoking as it crossed the 500 billion mark.
-------------------- "keep your stick on the ice & your cup firmly in place" Posts: 3651 | From: Algonac, MI. 48001 | Registered: Jun 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
The amount I bought this morning will take Upside and family and my family to St. Thomas soon (my def of soon...not UCs).
Posts: 1005 | From: Grapevine, TX 76051 | Registered: Aug 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
DW...i sure hope all us paid bashers are wrong for your sake. please just do all your paid basher friends a favor, if you get in the green get to a free share point at least if not cash out & take your profits. there is just way to much wrong here to ever do as the cult thinks & thats just applying stock market 101 info.
-------------------- "keep your stick on the ice & your cup firmly in place" Posts: 3651 | From: Algonac, MI. 48001 | Registered: Jun 2004
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Upside: originally posted by bousbous55:
quote:why can't ppl that think that certain stocks are scam just keep it to them self... crap! why shuv it down out throats????? grow up
I'll answer it this way bousbous. About a week or so ago you came on this thread and posed the question "how does this stock work?". Whether or not you read the responses is irrelevant but the point is that you were undecided about buying this stock, right? Now, if you had come on here and read nothing but glowing posts about how wonderful this stock is you probably would have bought it in a heartbeat without even realizing that this is at best a huge gamble and yes, could be an outright scam. Is that really the way it should be? The sentiment these days seems to be running against people that try to warn new investors about the potential pitfalls of a stock and that just doesn't make sense to me. I realize that we're all adults and responsible for our own decisions but if I'm looking into a stock and know nothing about it, I'll take any handout that anyone is offering to give me, positive or negative.
Upside, that is the best post recommending that all sides of the subject be told that I have yet seen.
As far a having to own a stock before one can post an opinion, that is a bunch of crap! If one has decided against buying, there is absolutely every reason other interested parties in that particular stock should know why or how that decision was made. Damn well tired of hearing that nonsense about not owning.
What gives some of you the idea that a forum is just for those that own the stock? If that is how you make your buying decisions, I feel very sorry for your portfolio.
PS: Another thing. Is basher the only word in the vocabulary of so many avid CMKX holders? As soon as someone has a contrary opinion, the first word that seems to come to their minds is "basher". That, too, is nonsense.
Posts: 3607 | From: NJ - Outside Phila. | Registered: Mar 2004
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by legaleagle: Has anything CMKX ever been Market 101?
Oh for sure under the section BLUNDERS 01.01
-------------------- Be Careful Of The Toes We Step On Today, They Could Be Attached To The Butt We Have To Kiss Tomorrow Posts: 4727 | From: Elk Grove ( Sacramento )CA USA | Registered: Jun 2004
| IP: Logged |
quote:Upside, that is the best post recommending that all sides of the subject be told that I have yet seen.
Thanks Wallace, I appreciate it. Now however, I've got some rather sad news. I am switching allegiances. That's right, no more bashing for me. Did you happen to see what dwman wrote earlier? I quote:
"The amount I bought this morning will take Upside and family and my family to St. Thomas soon."
So you see, outside of my meager holdings here, I now have a real interest in seeing this stock go up, so like I said, no more bashing for me. One other thing, does anyone know if pumpers get paid too or is there no such thing as a paid pumper? Seems to me there should be, for every ying there's a yang and so on. And if so, is the pay scale the same, 6 cents per post?
Posts: 5729 | From: Wisconsin | Registered: Sep 2003
| IP: Logged |
posted
You might have to go a little easier on him with all the digging you got him doing in your yard too.
Posts: 2634 | From: The highway | Registered: Feb 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
Business wire just came out with a new PR. It's circulating on several boards, but I'm not gonna post the whole thing here. But it does appear to be good news. GLTA
-------------------- If I give you bad information, please feel free to sue me. I have nothing left anyway. Ed Posts: 1772 | From: Oxford, PA, USA | Registered: Oct 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
It does look pretty good. I wonder if Doc will let me have my mojo back now?
Posts: 2634 | From: The highway | Registered: Feb 2004
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Highwaychild: It does look pretty good. I wonder if Doc will let me have my mojo back now?
Who knows I just might have to do that. But will have to wait and see, I have also been told that crow does not taste that bad with a little hot sauce. Don't get to excited and start cooking it yet At one time I was a big supporter of this stock, then when it went bad I got my tail feathers burnt. So I am going to adopt a wait and see attiutude.
[ February 17, 2005, 19:37: Message edited by: Doctoall ]
-------------------- Be Careful Of The Toes We Step On Today, They Could Be Attached To The Butt We Have To Kiss Tomorrow Posts: 4727 | From: Elk Grove ( Sacramento )CA USA | Registered: Jun 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
I only have 2 problems with PR. It looks good but:
1) Every pinksheet is making the assertion right now that they are going to start reporting. It was MLON biggest gimmick.
2) They could have reported basic information to stockholders wiothout this in the fist place. And they still can like what is the O/S. and this having to report old information first so it will take time. I already feel old and grey over listening to this same spill over again.
-------------------- Learn the hard way with pennies Posts: 153 | Registered: Nov 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
Due, The one big difference is that the other companies that claim they are going to start reporting never actually do. These guys look like they have taken the first step.
Now, someone owes me 12 cents for this post and the one prior to it.
Posts: 5729 | From: Wisconsin | Registered: Sep 2003
| IP: Logged |
posted
Shoot they can dilute another 3 billion shares tomorrow with that PR. Still can't see how you can do over 2 1/2 billion in volume and not move a little. Float has to be huge.
-------------------- Invest with your brain not with your heart. Posts: 4405 | From: Bristol, Tn, USA | Registered: Aug 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
I'd love to see one of you basher idiots tell Iron Bob Maheu that he's involved with a "SCAM". You jokers are too much!
Posts: 78 | Registered: Apr 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
Never said it was a scam. I said the Float must be huge. Meaning even if they do report you will still have to do a huge R/S to make it worth while. With the volume this has and no movement then there has to be changes somewhere if this company ever wants to convince new investors this isn't just another pink. And the only people that will get help is the ones that get in after the R/S.
-------------------- Invest with your brain not with your heart. Posts: 4405 | From: Bristol, Tn, USA | Registered: Aug 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
(BSNS WIRE) CMKM Diamonds Thanks New Securities Counsel for Reinstating 34 Act Reporting Status
CMKM Diamonds Thanks New Securities Counsel for Reinstating 34 Act Reporting Status
Business Editors
LAS VEGAS--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Feb. 17, 2005-- CMKM Diamonds Inc. (Pink Sheets: CMKX) today announced the reinstatement of its reporting status under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 through the filing of an amended Form 15.
On Feb. 9, 2005, CMKX engaged Stoecklein Law Group, a firm specializing in securities matters, as new securities counsel to assist with the correction of past deficiencies and guide CMKX through its regulatory compliance requirements. "When I joined the board one of my prime assignments was to improve corporate compliance. A prime component was to reinstate reporting status, which was efficiently and expeditiously handled by the Stoecklein Law Group," stated Robert A. Maheu, co-chairman of CMKX.
"On behalf of the company and its stockholders, we would like to sincerely thank Roger Glenn and his firm for all of their past efforts," stated Urban Casavant, CEO/president of CMKX.
With its reporting requirements now reinstated, CMKX can now file current, quarterly and annual reports with the SEC disclosing vital corporate information to the investing public and its stockholders. However, due to the length of time CMKX has not been reporting there are a substantial number of filings, including financial statement audits, that will need to be made to bring CMKX current in its reporting obligations. Readers of this press release are encouraged to monitor the SEC's EDGAR Web site (www.sec.gov) for future CMKX filings.
"We are extremely appreciative of Stoecklein Law Group's immediate attention to our needs. I have worked with them in the past and they have always exceeded my expectations," said Maheu.
CMKX is currently working toward completing an audit of its financial statements and the preparation of the necessary SEC filings. Investors and stockholders are being asked to please refrain from contacting the company or Stoecklein Law Group to allow them to focus on completing the task at hand. All corporate updates will be made in press releases and filed in current reports on Form 8-K as they become available.
Forward-Looking Statements
This press release may contain statements that constitute "forward-looking statements" as defined under U.S. federal securities laws describing the reinstatement of CMKX's reporting obligations and the expected impact of these obligations on CMKX's operations. Generally, the words "believe," "expect," "intend," "estimate," "anticipate," "establish," "project" and similar expressions identify forward-looking statements, which generally are not historical in nature. Forward-looking statements are based on current expectations and assumptions that are subject to certain risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from CMKX's historical experience and its projections. Such forward-looking statements are inherently uncertain, and actual results may differ from those expressed or implied in the forward-looking statements. Consequently, readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date they are made.
CMKX's actual results could differ materially from such forward-looking statements because of factors such as: uncertain regulatory scrutiny; the current state of operations; unavailability of documentation and corporate records; timing necessary to comply with reporting requirements; lack of adequate internal controls; unforeseen capital deficiencies; unavailability of insurance; changes in the mining and metals environment, including actions of competitors; the effectiveness of CMKX's development and drilling programs; regulatory and legal changes; and other risks associated with companies in similar industries. CMKX undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements to reflect current events or circumstances after the date hereof or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.
KEYWORD: NORTH AMERICA NEVADA UNITED STATES CANADA INDUSTRY KEYWORD: NATURAL RESOURCES MINING/MINERALS SOURCE: CMKM Diamonds Inc.
CONTACT INFORMATION: CMKM Diamonds Inc. Andrew Hill, 306-752-3755 or 877-752-3755 cmkxir@mail.casavantmining.com
*** end of story ***
Posts: 2375 | Registered: Nov 2004
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by bousbous55: why can't ppl that think that certain stocks are scam just keep it to them self... crap! why shuv it down out throats????? grow up
Replace the word "scam" with "stock play of a lifetime" and you'll get the idea
Posts: 193 | Registered: Dec 2004
| IP: Logged |
UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!
Printer-friendly view of this topic
![[Wink]](wink.gif)
The concensus was that those "warning" were bashers.![[Big Grin]](biggrin.gif)
![[Smile]](smile.gif)
