posted
My point about the current financials, in case you missed it legaleagle, is that someone with the skills of a bookkeeper or 1st year accounting student could have had them out long, long ago!
IP: Logged |
posted
That being said, let's give the faithful full benefit of the doubt, and believe for a minute there is/was a strategic/tactical reason for not posting current financials. That still begs the question, what does republishing 1999-2001 financials have to do with the inevitable "filing"? Whatever is being defined as a filing this time around. What is the faithful's understanding of filing in the context of the recent post regarding the republishing of old financials?
quote:Originally posted by Wallace#1: My point about the current financials, in case you missed it legaleagle, is that someone with the skills of a bookkeeper or 1st year accounting student could have had them out long, long ago!
-------------------- A million seconds is 13 days. A billion seconds is 31 years.
IP: Logged |
posted
I just fell off my chair laffing at these pathetic 5 year old financials, though I have seen them before. Geez.
What on earth are they attempting here? This is so utterly ridiculous I can barely type.
What are we to think if we do see multi-million entries on the 2004's? For lack of a better word..theft? There are certainly no diamonds or operational mines.
This is VERY worrisome. I am beginning to seriously consider the depth of this, as far as my friends in the NHRA are concerned, when this hits the fan.
IP: Logged |
posted
Well, it's past my bedtime. I guess I'll have to wait until tomorrow to see the logic and connection with these financials and "filing". I guess if I don't get an answer I'll just have to wait "days", and see it, according to rde post. Could that be 5 days, 30 days, 60 days, 90 days, 180 days, 365 days,.............???
-------------------- A million seconds is 13 days. A billion seconds is 31 years.
IP: Logged |
posted
I'm inclined to give them the benefit of a doubt. Granted it is old figures, but it's more than we had yesterday, and I consider it a step in the right direction. Ya gotta start somewhere, and we could see more positive info in the next couple days.
-------------------- If I give you bad information, please feel free to sue me. I have nothing left anyway. Ed
IP: Logged |
posted
Come on Wallace, stake your claim to fame! Start the thread that will see the demise of this stock and have your name attached to it for all time.
IP: Logged |
posted
CMKX----- One year later. dwman, upside, doctoall, and others of the faithful, pooled their proceeds from cmkx sales and have purchased the following states----
All, but Texas.... Of course nobody has enough money to by my state. Oh, yes, and they bought Canada too.
IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by dwman: CMKX----- One year later. dwman, upside, doctoall, and others of the faithful, pooled their proceeds from cmkx sales and have purchased the following states----
All, but Texas.... Of course nobody has enough money to by my state. Oh, yes, and they bought Canada too.
We had Tx but threw it back, just to damm many problems So we opted to give it back to Mexico
-------------------- Be Careful Of The Toes We Step On Today, They Could Be Attached To The Butt We Have To Kiss Tomorrow
IP: Logged |
UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!
Printer-friendly view of this topic
![[Big Grin]](biggrin.gif)
![[Smile]](smile.gif)
