Allstocks.com's Bulletin Board Post New Topic  New Poll  Post A Reply
my profile login | register | search | faq | forum home

  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Allstocks.com's Bulletin Board » Micro Penny Stocks, Penny Stocks $0.10 & Under » CMKX--- 1 more time (Page 12)

 - UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!   This topic comprises 54 pages: 1  2  3  ...  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  ...  52  53  54   
Author Topic: CMKX--- 1 more time
bill1352
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for bill1352     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
figured i'd toss this in here for all to see take it for what its worth a newsletter from a pumping machine.


August Focus Stock Update

CMKM Diamonds, Inc. (CMKX)


“Christmas in December”


Since we elevated our opinion of CMKM Diamonds to our storied home page in August prior to any dividend record dates, The Green Baron Report has maintained that it was just a matter of time before the company would become fully reporting, and valuation of its mineral rights would surface. However, we did not think it would take quite so long for CMKM Diamonds to complete its filing that would divulge many closely held secrets. We still await the Company to reveal the exact total number of shares issued and outstanding, as well as results over rumored large diamond and other mineral finds that might dictate the potential huge value of the mining rights on its properties.

Many may wonder why a company would so desperately hang on to such information. The answer may lie in the macro trend of diamond hunting that has just taken on dramatic developments over the past several months in the Fort a la Corne area of Saskatchewan, Canada. Until just recently, it was virtually unknown whether this area contained the potential substance to maintain the expense of a world class diamond mine. However, news recently delivered by Shore Gold and the Kensington/De Beers projects in the Fort a la Corne area seem to indicate that this area may contain the biggest diamond bonanza in the world.

A company owning the mineral rights to land all around these new finds would want to expose its own findings in a methodical and specific way, particularly if its public stock was also being manipulated. The Green Baron Report maintains that CMKM Diamonds respected attorney D. Roger Glenn knows precisely how to manage the flow of information, and the timing of when this information will be exposed. We find it very curious that the last dividend announced so far (the second Juina Mining allotment - GEMM) will be paid on November 30. If a bear trap has been set, in our opinion the time to spring this trap would be just after all previously announced dividends have been paid.

The Green Baron Report would love to predict that CMKM Diamonds will begin its move higher in December. We originally thought that the “Christmas in July” rumors were hogwash, and the “Santa is arriving in August” was a little premature. The Green Baron Report itself even thought September would ring in the Holidays early based on the idea that CMKX naked shorts (its existence now appears widely accepted) would need to cover prior to the US Canadian Minerals (UCAD/USCA) dividend payout. Instead, we all saw what happened to the price of UCAD when these shorts decided not to cover CMKX and try to pay out the UCAD dividend.

So now Thanksgiving is just about upon us, and Christmas truly is right around the corner. We would love to tell our members that CMKM Diamonds stock will provide you with the best Christmas ever, but the only thing we can predict with certainty is that Christmas will indeed be in December. However, if we all just try to take a moment this time of the year and do something kind for another in need, perhaps by the time we hit the New Year we might discover that CMKM Diamonds is The Stock Play of a Lifetime (that is, unless you are short).

CMKX dividend stock US Canadian Minerals ended its suspension by the SEC with little fanfare on Thursday, November 12. Although USCA by rule was demoted to the Grey/Pink Sheets, we believe this exchange listing is only temporary and its listing on the Bulletin Board will soon be reinstated. USCA also filed its 10Q early yesterday morning. The Green Baron Report will not comb through the report as our focus is on CMKM Diamonds. We have a few questions, but there is nothing we have seen in the report that causes us any alarm or concern. USCA stock had little reaction one way or another to this filing. We believe the real answers await us in the CMKX filing.

Finally, CMKM Diamonds has hired Mr. Andrew Hill to be its new head of investor relations. Mr. Hill has a 30 year background in banking, finance, sales and communications. The Green Baron Report welcomes Mr. Hill to this position, and we anticipate he will handle his duties professionally and with integrity. The new CMKX investor relations contact will only be able to answer questions about publicly released information. We do not suggest asking questions that obviously can not or will not be answered. If you should have a need to contact him you can send an email to cmkxir@casavantmining.com.



Posts: 3651 | From: Algonac, MI. 48001 | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
bill1352
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for bill1352     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
just wanted to comment & maybe get a few opinions on this line from green baron............


The Green Baron Report itself even thought September would ring in the Holidays early based on the idea that CMKX naked shorts (its existence now appears widely accepted) would need to cover prior to the US Canadian Minerals (UCAD/USCA) dividend payout. Instead, we all saw what happened to the price of UCAD when these shorts decided not to cover CMKX and try to pay out the UCAD dividend.

this dividend was for restricted shares of ucad. does anyone know how you buy restricted shares of any stock without transfering the cert. itself?? if i have X number of restricted shares for company YYY in hand i can transfer them on the back of the paper share but i can't sell them on the open market. when company YYY issued me those restricted shares they had their t/a issue them because they are differant then common shares. now here i am, ameritrade,company yyy's t/a transfers a bunch of restricted shares into my street account for a dividend pay out. i'm putting restricted dividend shares from company yyy into my clients accounts and low & behold mm jeff transfers a bunch of common shares of company yyy into my street account to pass out for the dividend. do i (A) put these shares into my clients accounts & just mark them restricted (B) call company yyy's t/a & ask whats up or (C) call mm jeff & ask whats up. if i do A i'm part of the plot & if i do B its on the front page os SEC news the next day & C postpones the news by a day or so. if cmkx was naked shorted we would know it by now, proof solid. cnn would be covering it & blaming george w bush. i won't even start on how a mm covers CIM. its a non story, is not true period. unless someone knows a way to cover restricted shares with common shares.

[This message has been edited by bill1352 (edited November 18, 2004).]


Posts: 3651 | From: Algonac, MI. 48001 | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Upside
Member


Icon 1 posted      Profile for Upside     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
But therein lies the flaw in your thinking Bill. It's never as easy as options A, B, or C. To perpetuate the myth I believe we might be up near option X, Y, or Z by now and when those fail as well, they'll move on to option AA, BB and so on.

Seriously, I believe the current thinking is that the halt on USCA was orchestrated by Roger Glenn so that the SEC would discover the naked short problem on their own. Some are claiming that they have still not received their UCAD/USCA split shares yet and the SEC would discover this during the investigation. So, what I believe they are saying is that there have been no unrestricted shares put into our accounts disguised as restricted, there just wasn't enough restricted shares to go around, hence the orchestrated halt also referred to as "the bear trap". How this ties in with UCAD's run up is beyond my level of thinking though as are most of these theories.


Posts: 5729 | From: Wisconsin | Registered: Sep 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Wallace#1
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Wallace#1         Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Here's a really intelligent part from the Green Baron post above about the USCA 10Q:

"The Green Baron Report will not comb through the report as our focus is on CMKM Diamonds. We have a few questions, but there is nothing we have seen in the report that causes us any alarm or concern."
*****************************************

"Now, isn't that special?"

I am especially impressed with the part about "nothing causing alarm or concern". Talk about being in the dark!! What a bunch of crap!! Anyone who could write or believe that garbage has some real problems with reality.

More diversion from CMKX by talking about USCA, Glenn, etc. Not one bit of which said anything meaningful.

[This message has been edited by Wallace#1 (edited November 18, 2004).]


Posts: 3607 | From: NJ - Outside Phila. | Registered: Mar 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
TruthTeller
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for TruthTeller     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
“Christmas in December”??? Do we need Green Baron to know that?
Posts: 264 | From: ATL | Registered: May 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Highwaychild
Member


Icon 1 posted      Profile for Highwaychild     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Website update...

Vroom,Vroom.Errrrrrrrrrrr! http://www.cmkxtreme.com/
I Hope they got something
else besidses horsepower.


Posts: 2634 | From: The highway | Registered: Feb 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Upside
Member


Icon 1 posted      Profile for Upside     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Pretty cool site highway. Wish they'd put that much effort into the diamond mining site. By the way, I had a buy in all day today for 5 million at .0001 just to see if it would fill. Never did. Good thing too, I'd be kicking myself right now if it did. Gonna try a sell all day tomorrow at .0002.
Posts: 5729 | From: Wisconsin | Registered: Sep 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Highwaychild
Member


Icon 1 posted      Profile for Highwaychild     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Good luck either way.But winter time is comming.
I just hope they got some sites set up to drill for the deep freeze.

Posts: 2634 | From: The highway | Registered: Feb 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
legaleagle
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for legaleagle     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
According to the 10Q Ed Dhonau sold 200,000 shares of USCA at $4.10 on Nov 12. On that date only 83,000 USCA shares traded on the market at around 3.00ps. Who did he sell them to? It wasn't on the open market. Would he be selling in the midst of an SEC investigation without their blessing? That would be a "red flag". Was a deal cut with SEC approval for these shares to be used to help cover the NS position?

Posts: 2375 | Registered: Nov 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Upside
Member


Icon 1 posted      Profile for Upside     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Yep, I'll bet that was it!
Posts: 5729 | From: Wisconsin | Registered: Sep 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Upside
Member


Icon 1 posted      Profile for Upside     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Sorry for responding the way I did legal. However, you seem to know what you're talking about here so maybe you should post all of the information. The suspension was over then and the stock was trading again so he's free to sell if he wants. Also it was a code "s" sale so since it didn't show up in the daily volume it was a private sale. Also, if you look at the form 4, all of his sales and purchaes go through at something other than market price. On March 22nd he sold 31,900 shares at $6.78 when the stock was at $2.40. In July he sold a total of 50,000 between $2.57 and $5.53 when the stock was in a range between .90 and $2.45. His few purchases have been the same way, all well above the market price. It happens all the time and to isolate one example to validate the conspiracy theory is bending the truth a bit, don't you agree?
Posts: 5729 | From: Wisconsin | Registered: Sep 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
lanebro
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for lanebro     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by highwaychild:
Website update...

Vroom,Vroom.Errrrrrrrrrrr! http://www.cmkxtreme.com/
I Hope they got something
else besidses horsepower.


I'm back from Pomona, 2004 race season over! Glad to be home for a solid couple months...

Anyone hear about the great billboard (I saw 4 on the highway, 2 at the track) ads in Vegas for CMKXtreme? Huge dollars blown on that course of action.

Did anyone notice that after the BIG announcement for 2005 sponsorships, 2 races ago, Arend has failed to qualify (after a consistent multi race run). What a turn of events. Blew up a bunch of stuff, too. Fate?

Also, I haven't seen Mr. Casavant at the start line since Sonoma, CA, in July. His brother's always there, plus MANY soldiers. Seem to be having a grand ol' time.

This is really funny.. friends of mine told me at Vegas one of these CMKX soldiers, who wrangled them in the pits, told them they're making a Hollywood MOVIE about CMKX! Urban's life story! The guy was SERIOUS!
GEEZ.

Guess what kind of $$$$ UC has going to 3 race teams next year... in excess of 2.6M! Rumor perhaps, but it seems accurate. I've been in the biz a long time. 3 teams, probably way understated. And that's not even including his SpeedTruck series sponsorship.

I am truly stunned. Woulda, shoulda, coulda. Brilliant. Big smokey burn-outs.

[This message has been edited by lanebro (edited November 19, 2004).]


Posts: 81 | From: St Louis MO | Registered: Aug 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
pennykid
Member


Rate Member
Icon 6 posted      Profile for pennykid     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
hey lanebro,
Do you do track racing or drag racing. I always wanted to be a race car driver and am saving up for racing school in arizona. I'll be taking a grand prix racing course. It is a 4 day thing but it costs $4,000 + airfair to get there. If all goes well i can get my SCAA racing license and have some real fun. jsut now i could only do drag racing or amature racing. How did you start?

Posts: 58 | From: gloucester,mass,u.s. | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
legaleagle
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for legaleagle     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Upside:
Sorry for responding the way I did legal. However, you seem to know what you're talking about here so maybe you should post all of the information. The suspension was over then and the stock was trading again so he's free to sell if he wants. Also it was a code "s" sale so since it didn't show up in the daily volume it was a private sale. Also, if you look at the form 4, all of his sales and purchaes go through at something other than market price. On March 22nd he sold 31,900 shares at $6.78 when the stock was at $2.40. In July he sold a total of 50,000 between $2.57 and $5.53 when the stock was in a range between .90 and $2.45. His few purchases have been the same way, all well above the market price. It happens all the time and to isolate one example to validate the conspiracy theory is bending the truth a bit, don't you agree?

Upside, the suspension was over by two days but we do not know if the investigation was ongoing or not. And for the major shareholder of the company to unload that many shares just two days after, is to invite a run on that company, or a reopeining of the investigation, if closed.

My answer was in response to bill1352's question: "its a non story, is not true period. unless someone knows a way to cover restricted shares with common shares."

The better way to cover restricted shares is to buy them from the company, or a major corporate shareholder.

And we know that a major corporate shareholder was placing a private sale just two days after his company was suspended from trading.

I was only trying to answer his question with a possible scenario.

To accuse me of "bending the truth" to validate your opinion that there is no NS positon is a little unfair as well.


Posts: 2375 | Registered: Nov 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
lanebro
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for lanebro     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by pennykid:
hey lanebro,
Do you do track racing or drag racing. I always wanted to be a race car driver and am saving up for racing school in arizona. I'll be taking a grand prix racing course. It is a 4 day thing but it costs $4,000 + airfair to get there. If all goes well i can get my SCAA racing license and have some real fun. jsut now i could only do drag racing or amature racing. How did you start?



My whole family has been drag racers for years, it's in my genes. These days, I just wrench on the car race weekends, I don't have the time to devote more right now, have little ones to raise...to be drag racers! Train 'em young we always say!

It is pretty consuming. Prepare yourself.

Go for your dreams Kid, whatever floats your boat. Having fun is most important.


Posts: 81 | From: St Louis MO | Registered: Aug 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
bill1352
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for bill1352     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
legel,....let me get this straight, the SEC told ucad it was ok to sell shares to mm's to cover a naked short a month after the pay date??? and a company that is partnered with cmkx said ok i'll do that, lets hide a naked short even more. let me guess there wasn't enough shares around to buy so by having a 3-1 forward split that gave him enough shares to do it with. i'm sure the same goes for the gemm split. ok tell me how the SEC stuck it to us with CIM.
Posts: 3651 | From: Algonac, MI. 48001 | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
legaleagle
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for legaleagle     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by bill1352:
legel,....let me get this straight, the SEC told ucad it was ok to sell shares to mm's to cover a naked short a month after the pay date??? and a company that is partnered with cmkx said ok i'll do that, lets hide a naked short even more. let me guess there wasn't enough shares around to buy so by having a 3-1 forward split that gave him enough shares to do it with. i'm sure the same goes for the gemm split. ok tell me how the SEC stuck it to us with CIM.

You seem to be adding a lot of words to what I said. The shares in many accounts are only "markers". That is now a proven fact, that the brokerages are doing this.

I think the MM's are scurrying to cover all dividends that they are short on. And I don't pretend to know how they are doing it. You asked how it was possible, and I answered. UCAD was the first that needed to be covered. I doubt they have even started to cover the split shares.

Do you know that the CIM in your account is real? Or any of the dividends? I haven't ordered certs yet so I don't know. But when it was discovered that the GEMM shares are only markers, I think we have to begin wondering about all of the dividends.

It is possible that "markers" were placed on all of them, thinking that they had a year to make them good.

CIM, however, is not restricted and real shares can only be obtained from Casavant. It appears the pressure is on and the brokerages don't know how to handle it.


Posts: 2375 | Registered: Nov 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Upside
Member


Icon 1 posted      Profile for Upside     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
originally posted by legaleagle:
quote:
To accuse me of "bending the truth" to validate your opinion that there is no NS positon is a little unfair as well.

That's not what I did. My post had nothing to do with my belief or disbelief in the short theory. I was simply stating facts that you elected to omit, to apparently lend credence to your position.



Posts: 5729 | From: Wisconsin | Registered: Sep 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
bill1352
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for bill1352     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
in responce to your post legel i called ameritrade to see what i could find out. the bulk shares of ucad have arrived into their street account. the CIM shares are in street account. the gemm shares are not but he considered that normal. for cleint satisfaction they normally place the shares in our accounts on the pay date and rarely do they get the bulk shares that same day. this doesn't disprove what you are saying but its not un-normal either. i did ask about possibilities concerning mm's buying & placing shares in bulk into their street accounts & he declined answering my question. he said he should just leave that question alone. so for now i guess your theory is still possible but as for ucad it has been covered.
Posts: 3651 | From: Algonac, MI. 48001 | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
dwman
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for dwman     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
I'M outta here!!! I can't stands it no more!
I'm off to Puerto Rico for a week at the Wyndham El San Juan where, 30 years ago, my wife was the hotel nurse and I was a Hurricane Preparedness Meteorologist for the Caribbean. Been back several times since then but never stayed at the El San Juan.

Upside, sorry I can't help you dig until I get back. One thing about it... I don't think I'll have to worry about cmkx running while I'm gone. LOL

Keep the faith.


Posts: 1005 | From: Grapevine, TX 76051 | Registered: Aug 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Bob Frey
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Bob Frey     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Anyone get CASAZZ shares from cmkx?
Posts: 3417 | From: Cleveland, Ohio | Registered: Jan 2000  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Upside
Member


Icon 1 posted      Profile for Upside     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
originally posted by dwman:
quote:
Upside, sorry I can't help you dig until I get back.

I'll save some prime yard space for you. Enjoy your trip.


Posts: 5729 | From: Wisconsin | Registered: Sep 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Wallace#1
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Wallace#1         Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Gonna miss you, dwman. Safe trip! Have fun.
Posts: 3607 | From: NJ - Outside Phila. | Registered: Mar 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Wallace#1
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Wallace#1         Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Bob Frey:
Anyone get CASAZZ shares from cmkx?

I had some but sold them to JBCak in a private sale. He'd buy anything remotely related to CMKX! LOL


Posts: 3607 | From: NJ - Outside Phila. | Registered: Mar 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
legaleagle
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for legaleagle     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Bob Frey:
Anyone get CASAZZ shares from cmkx?

Never heard of it.

[This message has been edited by legaleagle (edited November 19, 2004).]


Posts: 2375 | Registered: Nov 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
legaleagle
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for legaleagle     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
I know how much the 'shorts' are disgrutled by this guy DR.D. but here it is anyway. It's a few weeks old, but gives some reasonable answers to what is being discussed here.


Heads up from Dr. Diamond (part 1)

Global Moderator
Posts: 689
A heads up for CMKXers
« Thread started on: Today at 10:59:13 »

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In light of the upcoming news and events we are seeing an increase in the basher movement against not only CMKX but also UCAD. It seems that Stock Patrol has either some new competition or a new accomplice in their attacks of CMKX and management in StockLemon.com. I believe we all expected a step up in the assault after the UCAD dividend distribution date arrived and we have not been disappointed.

For a heads up, there are several individuals disguising themselves as well meaning CMKX investors that are grouping together to try and discourage CMKXers from holding and are attempting to rally others against CMKX and partners. These individuals are using the boards and the Pal Talk rooms to try and spread their disparaging advice. Newbies, please follow the lead of the experienced longs and admins when dealing with these negatively opportunistic individuals as they will try and appeal to your sense of fairness and will desire you to be sympathetic with their situation all intended to bring about your demise.

We are at a very critical place with CMKX and the journey to exchange-hood and success and these next 2 weeks should be very important indeed. This is further evidenced by the pressure that our joint venture partners and allies are feeling in the market place as the heat by the manipulators turns on them as well to try and discredit the value of our dividends. In my opinion, “Shorty” is in trouble on UCAD and the marker shares in our accounts from the dividend are going to have to be settled. As of This morning the DTC had not yet delivered the actual shares certificate to Ameritrade and have no idea when they will be delivered, per my phone conversation with Brian in client services and Mr. Johnson in the reorganization department. A.G. Edwards reportedly has not posted the UCAD dividend in any of their shareholder accounts either.

Many have misinformation that shorty skated through the UCAD distribution unscathed but the reality is that they are having big problems. Rendal Williams added to the complexities by the UCAD 3:1 forward and we can see the manipulators disapproval in the market place since the announcement. If, and I do say if, shorty had to place naked short UCAD shares or short UCAD shares in CMKX NSS client accounts then there will have to be a UCAD cover at least temporarily as the Oct 25 record date for the UCAD 3:1 forward split is approaching. It also has been reported that instead of placing NSS of UCAD some firms are placing free trading market shares of UCAD into some accounts.

The DTC evidently is having problems figuring out where all of the shares are going to come from to distribute to all of the CMKX shareholders since the 6th of Oct and now that problem is tripled. Any legitimate share of UCAD will be multiplied, but the shares they have not already obtained from UCAD to cover with will not be multiplied and the plot thickens.

A phone call to your brokerage firms and inquiring about the UCAD shares being truly delivered into your account could yield some interesting information. They will say they have been posted to your account, but as I have found out if you try to withdraw them in certificate form it is denied because the true certificates have not been delivered by the DTC to the brokerage firms Street Name. Meaning, they have no restricted UCAD shares to send us at this time. Speak to the reorganization Department at your broker and ask them specifically about the time frame for the UCAD delivery so you can withdraw your UCAD certificates, whether you intend to or not.


A heads up for CMKXers (continued)
« Thread started on: Today at 10:59:13 »

CIM is on the starting block and things are just now starting to get good and GEMM is in the system for the near future. Cudos go out to Roger, Urban, Rendal, and Ed Dhonau for their combined efforts in swinging the tide and bringing CMKX in control of the direction that the securities conflict is traveling. This is just my opinion, but I believe the tide has changed and we are on the offensive now and taking the game to the MM’s on a different level.

The market on our partners (SGGM, UCAD and GEMM) are refreshing themselves or have took a rest and will rally later today and hopefully Monday on the webcast news coming forth from Urban and Rendal. Many are hoping for the fully reporting news to come out this weekend, but I think the Big bomb will be methodically placed by Roger at exactly the right time and place to yield the most benefit to all concerned. We are talking about share structure, valuation, financials, etc… and this will not be done over a web cast in my opinion. I believe we may get the information that the papers have been filed and we are waiting for a response from the SEC, but I don’t necessarily see a fully reporting announcement coming at this time. I could be wrong and hope I am, but I believe it will be better placed immediately following (within a week or so) the CIM dividend distribution instead of preceding it.

I have been long enough and will not stretch this out any further. Hold on to your shares and wait for the company to bring forth the PR’s and the info that will better equip the company to make its steps forward.

Success is at hand.

These are just my opinions and I ask that you treat them as such.

P.S. George did you find the CMKX offices in Vegas?TIA

Dr.D

Part 2:

A heads up for CMKXers (continued)
« Thread started on: Today at 10:59:13 »

CIM is on the starting block and things are just now starting to get good and GEMM is in the system for the near future. Cudos go out to Roger, Urban, Rendal, and Ed Dhonau for their combined efforts in swinging the tide and bringing CMKX in control of the direction that the securities conflict is traveling. This is just my opinion, but I believe the tide has changed and we are on the offensive now and taking the game to the MM’s on a different level.

The market on our partners (SGGM, UCAD and GEMM) are refreshing themselves or have took a rest and will rally later today and hopefully Monday on the webcast news coming forth from Urban and Rendal. Many are hoping for the fully reporting news to come out this weekend, but I think the Big bomb will be methodically placed by Roger at exactly the right time and place to yield the most benefit to all concerned. We are talking about share structure, valuation, financials, etc… and this will not be done over a web cast in my opinion. I believe we may get the information that the papers have been filed and we are waiting for a response from the SEC, but I don’t necessarily see a fully reporting announcement coming at this time. I could be wrong and hope I am, but I believe it will be better placed immediately following (within a week or so) the CIM dividend distribution instead of preceding it.

I have been long enough and will not stretch this out any further. Hold on to your shares and wait for the company to bring forth the PR’s and the info that will better equip the company to make its steps forward.

Success is at hand.

These are just my opinions and I ask that you treat them as such.

P.S. George did you find the CMKX offices in Vegas?TIA

Dr.D

[This message has been edited by legaleagle (edited November 19, 2004).]


Posts: 2375 | Registered: Nov 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
bill1352
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for bill1352     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
R CMKX Buy / Close Cmkm Diamonds Inc 2062500 0.0002 412.50 0.00 Equity Quote Chart News Research


N/A* CMKM DIAMONDS INC CASAVANT INTL MINING RSTKD SHS 52800 0.00 0.00 0.00 Equity Quote Chart News Research

N/A* JUINA MINING CORP RESTRICTED 253 0.00 0.00 0.00 Equity Quote Chart News Research

N/A* US CANADIAN MINERALS INC RESTRICTED 57 0.00 0.00 0.00 Equity Quote Chart News Research

======================================================


this is what my ameritrade account has for cmkx


Posts: 3651 | From: Algonac, MI. 48001 | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Bob Frey
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Bob Frey     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
I traded cmkx once or twice in the past my broker tells me the 26,000+ CASAZZ shares stuck in my account came from cmkx.
Posts: 3417 | From: Cleveland, Ohio | Registered: Jan 2000  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
legaleagle
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for legaleagle     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
If you were in last year they may be the old CMI dividend shares. CASA (Casavant) ZZ

[This message has been edited by legaleagle (edited November 19, 2004).]


Posts: 2375 | Registered: Nov 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Bob Frey
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Bob Frey     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
No idea when I had it but free nuthing is still free...


Posts: 3417 | From: Cleveland, Ohio | Registered: Jan 2000  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
bill1352
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for bill1352     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
well legel i'm not sure where dr. d got his info & i do understand it is an old posting but this morning i was told by ameritrade reorganization dept. that both CIM & ucad were delievered into their street accounts. he called it a bulk delievery or 1 cert to cover all shares needed. if what you were saying & dr. d is saying is true then it was covered and it did nothing to benifit us. dr.d is one of the most fantastic story tellers involved in cmkx. i do find it interesting the volume has dropped dramatically, not close to 1 billion yet today
Posts: 3651 | From: Algonac, MI. 48001 | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
bill1352
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for bill1352     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
bob...lets hope we don't have a few more free nothings in our accounts...lol
Posts: 3651 | From: Algonac, MI. 48001 | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
legaleagle
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for legaleagle     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by bill1352:
well legel i'm not sure where dr. d got his info & i do understand it is an old posting but this morning i was told by ameritrade reorganization dept. that both CIM & ucad were delievered into their street accounts. he called it a bulk delievery or 1 cert to cover all shares needed. if what you were saying & dr. d is saying is true then it was covered and it did nothing to benifit us. dr.d is one of the most fantastic story tellers involved in cmkx. i do find it interesting the volume has dropped dramatically, not close to 1 billion yet today


You may want to call them back to see if they would deliver certs on those shares, whether you order them or not. I haven't yet, but it might be interesting, since many brokerages are turning down clients requests.


Posts: 2375 | Registered: Nov 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Upside
Member


Icon 1 posted      Profile for Upside     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Since were posting some current theories, here's Sterlings:

REVISION-1: CMKX/USCA-Seeking True Valuation...

Here’s what I see, but try not to fall asleep while reading this because you got to really read the whole thing for a complete understanding to see how CMKX is currently worth .03069 cents per share, in my opinion! I made a few revisions along the way to add more clarity.

Heck, since the USCA filings have already been out for a while, somebody might have already brought out these points. So my apologies if this is a repeat of topics that were already discussed. I’m pressed for time and will not be able to read the boards to get caught up again, but I felt it important to create this post to make sure I am seeing the same thing you all are seeing.

So, we now have a little more facts to go with than what we had before. The information I’m pulling from the recent USCA 10QSB filed with the SEC are considered facts substantiated from the SEC and not by me. In my opinion, the SEC knew what USCA was about to release for their filings and if they had any problems with them, they would not have allowed them to return to trading. This moves us even more slightly away from spec-o-lation and more towards substance derived from doing reverse math to determine an anticipated CMKX valuation at a discounted price and not at a premium price.

Let’s first list the USCA facts from the filing and some other facts we know of:

The USCA Filing as of 16 Nov 04: http://knobias.10kwizard.com/filing.php?repo=tenk&ipage=3096088&doc=1&total=&back=1&g=&attach=on

Fact: USCA Outstanding Shares (OS) is 63,603,066 Shares

Fact: The Consolidated Statement of Operations used 16,656,760 Shares for the OS

Fact: CMKX OS ≤800,000,000,000 Shares

Fact: USCA Total Assets went from $6,430 to $73,834,515 in less than 1 Year

Fact: USCA went from a Total Stockholder’s Deficit of ($1,206,646) to Equity of $72,219,018

Fact: USCA went from a Total Liabilities and Stockholder’s Equity of $6,430 to Equity of $73,834,515 (Same as Total Assets above.)

Fact: Net Loss went from ($210,199) to ($1,225,741) with the bulk coming from “Consulting and Professional Fees” and “General and Administrative Expenses”

Fact: Currently Cash Flow Positive from negative ($28,110) to now $950,524 in less than a year

Discussion about the above Facts:
Taking your company from Total Liabilities and Stockholder’s Equity/Total Assets of $6,430 to $73,834,515 in less than a year is a huge sign of growth that should not be overlooked in my opinion. This phenomenal! This is very apparent that the forward split was done to increase more liquidity in their stock for anticipated growth in my opinion.

There was an increase in the Net Loss by ($1,015,542), but would you spend $1,015,542 to get $73,834,515 in Equity? No doubt! The question should be: Who wouldn’t? Let’s talk about why, but let me first put this into a better perspective for an understanding. Know too that Equity is important because Equity is used to help you capture Revenues.

Assets - Liabilities = Equity
Equity ÷ Outstanding Shares = Book Value (BV)

I have seen where many stocks trade at prices much lower than their BV. I have seen where a stock had a BV of $8.00+ and was trading below .01 cent with no intentions of ever going up in price. At one time ago, I thought that such meant that the stock was undervalued. Not necessarily so. Those were some tough lessons learned for those who knew me way back then. All it just meant was that the stock was not making money with their Assets.

The Fundamental Valuation that is used to determine where a stock should be trading at is predicated upon the Earnings Per Share (EPS) and not the Book Value (BV). So all the stuff we just talked about in having a BV as good as we have in USCA is good, but all it shows is growth. It does not justify share price.

It’s not significant as to show support as to why a stock should or should not be trading at a certain level. This growth in Equity is good in the sense because you can position yourself for Equity Financing to use as collateral to position the company towards generating Revenue (amongst other things too). Currently, we have no Revenues.

Why is all this important? Well…

Revenue - Expenses = Net Income
Net Income ÷ OS = EPS

Since USCA has a Net Loss instead of Net Income, this is not a positive considering the goals they are trying to achieve of becoming a profitable company, but this 10QSB shows huge promise in my opinion of where we are heading. The goal is to have a positive EPS to reflect Net Income. Still, significant growth was revealed in my opinion to show that USCA is positioning itself to becoming a profitable force to be reckoned with in the market in my opinion.

So now everyone has got to be wondering: How does all this plays in with CMKX and the price of apples? As far as with the price of apples, I’m not sure, but with CMKX we might have some things that are being subliminally revealed. Keep in mind that this is not me talking. This is USCA talking from being approved by the SEC to speak since they were previously silenced, but now allowed to resume trading. So don’t start any of this; Sterling is trying to hype stuff, or start rumors! LOL

Here is the key piece from the filing that we must first observe:

”On July 18, 2004, the Company acquired 5% of all mineral holdings of CMKM Diamonds, Inc. ("CMKM") for 22,000,000 shares of common stock of the Company.”

This shows me that a deal was cut that had USCA feeling that they were paying a certain amount for the 5% claims of CMKX at a discounted price. At that time, USCA was UCAD and was trading at around $4.50 per share. That is the amount that has been confirmed as a discounted amount in the eyes of USCA and apparently the SEC at such time.

The SEC is dealing with “the now” or with “what is” with the current valuation in my opinion with USCA since the halt/suspension was now and not done back then. I will use the price of USCA at the time of the halt/suspension and the total shares of 22,000,000 shares (post split 3-1 split adjusted) given at the time of the halt/suspension because that is what I believe the SEC was using for consideration. The price was $4.65 per share at such time. This is how I will base my figures on the “the now” or the “what is” for determination. If I was to revert back to the pre-split adjusted price I would have to use ($4.65 x 3) x 7,500,000 shares. Instead, I will use the post split price at the time of the halt/suspension of $4.65 per share and the post split adjusted amount of shares of 22,000,000 which is the amount listed in the filings. I’m not sure what happened to the other 500,000 shares for the difference.

This means that currently, USCA’s 5% that was screened by the SEC is equivalent to below:

$4.65 x 22,000,000 = $102,300,000 USCA’s 5% Worth of CMKX Claims

In my opinion, this is also the belief of the SEC from USCA proving such to them. Again, or they would not have allowed them to resume trading.

So, this $102,300,000 as a discounted price is what I think the SEC had under scrutiny for consideration to being worth 5% of all CMKX claims at least at a discount as confirmed by USCA and the SEC. It looks like all was proven that was in need of being proven in my opinion.

To get the value of CMKX let’s do this with some quick math. Just double the 5% amount to equal 10% then multiply by 10 to get the total piece of CMKX valuation at a minimum.

So,
$102,300,000 x 2 = $204,600,000 as the 10% Portion of CMKX Claims

Then,
$204,600,000 x 10 = $2,046,000,000 as the 100% Portion of CMKX Claims
(Or just slide the commas to the right one position.)

Now with using this $2,046,000,000 as our Intrinsic Valuation to determine valuation as Income, let’s determine our EPS. Let’s also assume that our Gold, Uranium, and other ventures will at least pay the bills to cover the Expenses that we are leaving out for this calculation. I think this is a fair assumption to say the least as it probably would contribute to a much higher share price. Let’s also max out the OS for CMKX to being 800,000,000,000 Shares. Please observe below:

Net Income ÷ OS = EPS
$2,046,000,000 ÷ 800,000,000,000 = .0025575 EPS

The .0025575 is the EPS and is not the BV. It is not Equity. In the mining field, Revenues are represented as the company’s resources in the ground. In the mining field, our resources that we pull out of the ground is our valuation that is reflected as our Revenue. Please go to the link below to see the major market mining stocks listed to read how they do this to file as their Revenues. You will then see why it is safe to consider such as I did Revenues. Earlier you read what I did with the expenses. http://biz.yahoo.com/p/metalsconameu.html

Equity/Assets are used to help you generate Revenue. Example: Your machines used for drilling can be worth $2 Billion, but would not show up as Revenues. They would be considered your Assets/Equity used to help you generate Revenues/Income. Now, the Revenues would be what those Assets will be either going to pull out of the ground or what they have already pulled out of the ground.

Since we are still in infant stages in our growth as a mining company with CMKX, it is fair to use the valuation that is made prevalent as the Intrinsic Value that is to be what is in the ground to be taken out to be as Revenues. This I considered as Intrinsic Valuation just to eliminate the debate about valuation of what is revealed, but still in the ground even if it is not pulled out yet, but proven that it is there. This is the 5% value of CMKX Claims purchased by USCA.

To better know how to view the 5% value, imagine there being 10 pieces to a pie and each piece costs .10 cents. Now, if you only had 1 piece of that pie, are you telling me you could not figure out the total value of that pie from only having 1 piece of that pie and knowing that .10 cents was the cost of that 1 piece of pie you have? I think you would see that it is at least safe to think that the pie could be valued at the minimum price of $1.00 for total valuation.

Let’s now determine the fundamental share price of CMKX from the information verified. To do this, we must look at the PE Ratio logic of determination. Some of this I posted before so a refresher shouldn’t hurt for a repeat since it has been a long while ago.

Normally in the market, somewhere between 10 and 15 seems to be a conservative PE Ratio to use as a multiple for today's normal growth expectancy. So that is why I will use 12 in the below example. Keep in mind that the PE Ratio is generally within the 25 to 30 PE Ratio range for mining stocks.

Many use the PE Ratio with stocks that either possess or have the potential to posses Earnings Per Share (EPS). The PE Ratio is often considered the minimum price investors are fundamentally willing to pay for a stock when multiplied by the EPS. The PE Ratio is used to examine the relationship between a company's price per share and EPS determined by:
Share Price ÷ EPS = PE Ratio

Using the PE Ratio as a multiple to determine stock prices conveys that the PE Ratio is a general growth expectancy rate determined from an average from the top 20 to 30 companies in that particular exchange/industry.

It is assumed that each company within that exchange/industry will grow with the same expectancy rate under certain Fundamental Principles in relation with a company's Revenue, Expenses, and Outstanding Share structure.

Those supporting a low PE ratio believe that the lower a PE ratio, the more undervalued that stock is within the market as compared to normal growth expectancy rates from companies trading within their market. (The OTCBB is considered being within the realm of the NASDAQ.) The low PE Ratio is considered an indicator that the stock is overlooked within the market. The denominator is the variable we need to consider for determining what price levels a stock should be fundamentally trading. This is why many are concerned about the OS here with CMKX.

Those supporting a high PE ratio believe that the higher a PE ratio, the more growth potential it has within the market because it's showing growth higher than the average conservative market PE ratio. It is assumed that the company would continue its normal expectant growth rate. The numerator is the variable we need to consider for determining what levels a stock should be fundamentally trading.

Here is a link to add about PE Ratio info: http://www.investopedia.com/terms/p/price-earningsratio.asp

The Earnings Per Share (EPS) is the amount of money that a company will give you, as a shareholder, the per share amount if the company was to distribute all net earnings to its shareholders multiplied by the normal growth expectancy ratio of price to earnings (PE Ratio) for that market.

Let's use the conservative PE Ratio of 12 for our calculations below. Let’s use basic algebra to convert the above results to find the share price that CMKX should be trading at as of now from what’s subliminally revealed:

CMKX Share Price = PE Ratio x EPS

CMKX Share Price = 12 x .0025575
CMKX Share Price = .03069 cents per share

So in my opinion, according to what was derived from the recent USCA 10QSB filed with the SEC and approved by the SEC to be legitimate, CMKX is still a discount to buy even if it was trading at .03069 cents per share.

We say at a minimum because the thought is that USCA is getting a deal at bargain basement prices for what they paid for the 5% of CMKX claims for becoming part of the CMKX foundation. So actually, the valuation is considered to being much higher.

This means that CMKX is significantly undervalued at its current share price in my opinion up until it reaches at least the .03069 cents per share area. With the valuation that I have shown above, this USCA filing is as good as a CMKX filing to show a total valuation $2,046,000,000 for the minimum valuation of the CMKX claims at a discounted price. Again, this is not Sterling’s opinion alone, but the SEC’s too as fact the way I see it!

All is well! http://www.sterlingsclass.com/
;-)
Sterling


Posts: 5729 | From: Wisconsin | Registered: Sep 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
ed19363
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for ed19363     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
More guesswork. Hell, you gotta be a financial genius just to follow what the guy is saying....and its still all "let's say", and "let's suppose". In other words, Sterling is full of condemnded horse manure.
Ed

Posts: 1772 | From: Oxford, PA, USA | Registered: Oct 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
  This topic comprises 54 pages: 1  2  3  ...  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  ...  52  53  54   

Quick Reply
Message:

HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.

Instant Graemlins
   


Post New Topic  New Poll  Post A Reply Close Topic   Feature Topic   Move Topic   Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:


Contact Us | Allstocks.com Message Board Home

© 1997 - 2021 Allstocks.com. All rights reserved.

Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classic™ 6.7.2

Share