posted
Man, the Skins just don't want this one that bad. They look like they don't even care.
Posts: 474 | From: Central PA | Registered: Oct 2003
| IP: Logged |
-------------------- Remember two things: You love New York City and leave only your footprints. Posts: 1526 | From: Chatham, NJ... and NC-- Wake Forest University | Registered: Jul 2005
| IP: Logged |
I wonder if Tom Brady can swallow a football? Maybe John Lynch'll find out here in a minute.lol
Posts: 2634 | From: The highway | Registered: Feb 2004
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by bdgee: Depends on which side you are biased for.
if your looking for the ball.
and someone grabs your shoulder its pass interference on him. bias aside
If you're pushing a reciever (or even toucching him) while the ball is in the air, wheteher or not you are looking back (halfheartedly and only after you have already grabbed him), and the reciever is over 5 yards beyond the line of scrimage, the rules say it is interference.
Posts: 11304 | From: Fort Worth, Texas | Registered: Mar 2005
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by bdgee: Depends on which side you are biased for.
if your looking for the ball.
and someone grabs your shoulder its pass interference on him. bias aside
If you're pushing a reciever (or even toucching him) while the ball is in the air, wheteher or not you are looking back (halfheartedly and only after you have already grabbed him), and the reciever is over 5 yards beyond the line of scrimage, the rules say it is interference.
yes, and if your a defender with your head up looking for the ball, not touching the receiver, and the receiver grabs your shoulder. at this point ther receiver has no right to touch defender either.
you need to see the whole replay not the snipit where they're jousting
Posts: 9110 | From: boston, ma | Registered: Jan 2004
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by bdgee: Depends on which side you are biased for.
if your looking for the ball.
and someone grabs your shoulder its pass interference on him. bias aside
If you're pushing a reciever (or even toucching him) while the ball is in the air, wheteher or not you are looking back (halfheartedly and only after you have already grabbed him), and the reciever is over 5 yards beyond the line of scrimage, the rules say it is interference.
yes, and if your a defender with your head up looking for the ball, not touching the receiver, and the receiver grabs your shoulder. at this point ther receiver has no right to touch defender either.
you need to see the whole replay not the snipit where they're jousting
The call was because the defender pused the reciever so that he couldn't reach the ball, i.e., interference. There is no rule declaring that a defender is absolved of interference if he looks bacward as he commits the foul. If you impede the opportunity of the reciever (or the defender) to reach or catch the ball, it's interference.
Posts: 11304 | From: Fort Worth, Texas | Registered: Mar 2005
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by bdgee: Depends on which side you are biased for.
if your looking for the ball.
and someone grabs your shoulder its pass interference on him. bias aside
If you're pushing a reciever (or even toucching him) while the ball is in the air, wheteher or not you are looking back (halfheartedly and only after you have already grabbed him), and the reciever is over 5 yards beyond the line of scrimage, the rules say it is interference.
yes, and if your a defender with your head up looking for the ball, not touching the receiver, and the receiver grabs your shoulder. at this point ther receiver has no right to touch defender either.
you need to see the whole replay not the snipit where they're jousting
The call was because the defender pused the reciever so that he couldn't reach the ball, i.e., interference. There is no rule declaring that a defender is absolved of interference if he looks bacward as he commits the foul. If you impede the opportunity of the reciever (or the defender) to reach or catch the ball, it's interference.
the DEFENDER was in front of him running with head up. He was grabbed from behind, the rules are the same for both sides. the call was wrong, even the official kissing butt play by play guys won't say it was pass interference.
Posts: 9110 | From: boston, ma | Registered: Jan 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
It WAS pass interference. Listening to Phill Simms doesn't make it, not pass interference. Just because you look at the ball, doesn't say you can elwbow him out of bounds.
Besides it's 27-13 Broncos! That one play don't make the game, Broncos kicked a$$!LOL
Posts: 2634 | From: The highway | Registered: Feb 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
PATS SUCKED AS AS Bad As I've seen them. Even this year with the injuries they didn't screw up like tonight.Oh Well
I hate indy and pitt. indy the most, boy i hate that manning piece of dirt.
I think Denver had bad rushing yards and passing yards tonight compared to the pats so I don't see them beating anyone.
I did want Pitt Vs. Pats so I could go to the game but thats out.
think I'll root for some people getting hit hard..(as I type this they announce that some guy from indy stabbed by wife. LOL)
Posts: 9110 | From: boston, ma | Registered: Jan 2004
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Highwaychild: It WAS pass interference. Listening to Phill Simms doesn't make it, not pass interference. Just because you look at the ball, doesn't say you can elwbow him out of bounds.
Besides it's 27-13 Broncos! That one play don't make the game, Broncos kicked a$$!LOL
LOL. watch again. no touching after 5 yards, denver guy grabbed him to slow him down. (i actually think nothing should be called, i like jousting) but saying the pats guy stopped him from making the catch and they deserved it at the 1 is silly.
I think the pats sucked more than the broncos kicked ass but good luck, i think shanahan is a great coach. and would rather they win than anyone else in afc.
Posts: 9110 | From: boston, ma | Registered: Jan 2004
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Highwaychild: How about the Denver defense, how'd they play?
not very good. until given the lead.. then better but. none of the fumbles were caused by bone crushing hits, they were stupid ass one hand carying into trouble.
Posts: 9110 | From: boston, ma | Registered: Jan 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
I have to say, Tom Brady is lucky he has Deion Branch, one hell of a WR, ...from LOUISVILLE!(as Chris Berman, and Tom Jackson would say)lol
Posts: 2634 | From: The highway | Registered: Feb 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
call was right--even though they may have guessed at it... used his hip, then arm, then stiff-arm as legs keep moving: basically an aikido move that defensive backs are taught, how to disrupt the receiver with minimal "review" exposure...this time, he got caught...
Champ Bailey, MVP...what a nice "torque" motion to get into position--even though he looked like Leon Lett getting punk'd by Don Beebe at the end of the play...great challange by Bellicek on that one...40:60 he gets a touchback....
quote:Originally posted by Highwaychild: How about the Denver defense, how'd they play?
not very good. until given the lead.. then better but. none of the fumbles were caused by bone crushing hits, they were stupid ass one hand carying into trouble.
13 points??? All thay had.
Posts: 2634 | From: The highway | Registered: Feb 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
LOL, Tex. Leon Lett went through my mind as well. Maybe Champ has been dippin' in his stash.LOL!
Posts: 2634 | From: The highway | Registered: Feb 2004
| IP: Logged |
UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!
Printer-friendly view of this topic
