As things now stand, the public lacks access to complete and reliable information about CMKM Diamonds, including its financial status, business activities or stock issuances," the SEC lawyer continues. "Thus, the public cannot make informed investment decisions.
"This lack of information is certain to continue, given that CMKM Diamonds has made little progress towards preparing its financial statements, that the company's outside auditor has resigned and that the company is unable to estimate when it will file reports."
its august the 10th, about 6 months since cmkx said the form 15 was wrong. no financials to audit & no auditor. cant seem to find any way to get stuff together to give an auditor. why even file for a review? from what beckstead seems to say cmkx wants the auditor to put everything together. if cmkx was serious about shareholder knowledge there would be a lot of 8k's coming out explaining the master list if nothing else. the letter legal posted is so full of chit its unbelievable. first the filing they brought up, the 14c was done when the o/s was under 100 billion. it doesn't say the ppl's shares increased with the o/s or a/s. thus once the a/s hit 200 billion they no longer had 4.9% & that % kept dropping as the a/s & o/s was increased. the mining rule does not mean you get out of filing completely, only certain things can be left out. in feb. 2004 UC had given out more then 100 billion shares according to the master list. in fact when the a/s was increased to 800 billion according to the master list it was to cover shares given out by UC prior to the a/s increase. something they probably found out after announcing the divys. that letter sounds like a coach trying to argue about a call saying the video used for instant reply was lying. the letter is right about 1 thing, when the form 15 was filed the SEC should have called cmkx's t/a, since its clear UC didn't bother too. it would have stopped his scam at the starting gate.
-------------------- "keep your stick on the ice & your cup firmly in place" Posts: 3651 | From: Algonac, MI. 48001 | Registered: Jun 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
Oy....two more months of this crapola. This thing just will not die. Anybody have any silver bullets??
-------------------- If I give you bad information, please feel free to sue me. I have nothing left anyway. Ed Posts: 1772 | From: Oxford, PA, USA | Registered: Oct 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
ed, for $40 they will send you the divys. you can then call the correct t/a & see what they will charge to exchange them for unrestricted shares but first the company's have to remove the restrictions. until then its not worth the bother. if they do ever remove the restrictions you better call your broker before trying to sell them & see what rules apply.
-------------------- "keep your stick on the ice & your cup firmly in place" Posts: 3651 | From: Algonac, MI. 48001 | Registered: Jun 2004
| IP: Logged |
Yesterday at 8:28am, treyb wrote:Peter, it is unfortunate that you can't prove anything in your post, yet you present it as fact. You offer illogical speculation once again.
You should remember that the simplest explanation, containing the fewest assumptions, is usually correct.
your right treyb the simpelest is probably true so here we go. remember GB's graph shows shares surrendered and volume spikes almost identical? well go back and look at Pedros exibits Most of those shares are issued and surrendered the same day. looks pretty bleak huh! I meanlooks like uc and friends got those shares issued and sold them the same day right?
well if the T/A cut the certs and handed them directly to someone right now. and they went directly to theyre broker how long would it take for that cert to be processed by the broker. then sent to the dtcc and processed then sent back to the T/A and processed out as surrendered in the T/A books? Remember alot of these entities are canadian also.
Now which answer is the simplest? 1) those shares were issued and handed directly to all of those individuals then taken directly to a brokerage, processed thru the broker, dtcc and back to the T/A and processed out as surrendered on the very same day?
2) is it possible that the shares never left the building?
which is the easiest answer?
Posts: 2375 | Registered: Nov 2004
| IP: Logged |
Joined: Dec 2004 Gender: Male Posts: 299 Re: *Our situation normal.....I think not! « Reply #9 on Yesterday at 9:19am »
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- i just find it interresting that there was so mouch interrest in the stock the very days the shares were surrendered compared to the days they werent. its almost spooky huh. but If the interrest was self generated meaning that there was an entity that picked up all or most of the"surrendered shares taht makes the chart more logical IMO. We do know with Reg D shares that they have to be registered that means that the transactions have to run thru a broker but what about the s registered shares. what if cmkm llc thats in canada took posession of the s shares in cananda. that would mean no registration needed as they are forign entities. and it would also allow uc to pick up shares thru the entitiy in canada without requireing a form 3 because the s registration dosent require disclosure and they are not controlled shares. just some thoughts as to how those shares could be issued and surrendered in the T/a's books the very same day normal avanues imo are physically impossible. jmo ~Phx
Posts: 2375 | Registered: Nov 2004
| IP: Logged |
Yesterday at 9:25am, treyb wrote: Yesterday at 9:08am, NOS ProMod wrote:i'll take #2 ....i have had the same thoughts....seems like those charts are too close to be dumping and us normal buyers buying at the exact same time.....IMHO (not sure why) UC was making it look like dumping to bait more NSS?? ...jmo...jmo...jmo
If we are going to use Pedro's numbers and GB's graphs, then the simplest explanation is that no NSS exists, since the O/S gets reconciled to the 778 billion figure.
ok thats if thats the simplest explaination to you can you let us know how is and i say if the entities that were issued these shares and if they were sitting at the T/A's office waiting for the certs how they got to theyre brokerages signed the certs the broker processed them drove them to the dtcc then the dtcc drove them to the T/A to be processed out all in the same day? Maybe for someone from Nevada but what about the canadian entities? I know when Ive ordered certs from the Time that Jeff has told me tghey were issued to the time I got them has averaged about 10 days that just 1 trip. But if they were issued directly from the T/A mail in a perfect world would take at least 3 days to recieve them locally ~Phx
Posts: 2375 | Registered: Nov 2004
| IP: Logged |
Joined: Dec 2004 Gender: Male Posts: 299 Re: *Our situation normal.....I think not! « Reply #16 on Yesterday at 9:54am »
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Also look at the A/S increases in feb 2004 and March 2004 those percentages were increasing from 97b to 200b was voted on by 55% then 200b to 500b Voted on by 65% If your diluting by selling as well as increasing the O/S how does you voting percentage go Up? ~Phx
Posts: 2375 | Registered: Nov 2004
| IP: Logged |
Joined: Dec 2004 Gender: Male Posts: 299 Re: *Our situation normal.....I think not! « Reply #18 on Yesterday at 10:01am »
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I dont think they are any longer. I personally think cmkm llc thats incorporated in regina sask took control of all of the s restricted shares right there in the T/A's office thats what I think. Issued surrendered and not registered all under reg s. Thats why I think the argument about the form 15 still exists. JMO ~Phx
Posts: 2375 | Registered: Nov 2004
| IP: Logged |
Yesterday at 12:45pm, GeorgeBurns wrote: Yesterday at 10:01am, phxgold wrote:I dont think they are any longer. I personally think cmkm llc thats incorporated in regina sask took control of all of the s restricted shares right there in the T/A's office thats what I think. Issued surrendered and not registered all under reg s. Thats why I think the argument about the form 15 still exists. JMO ~Phx
Reg s or not... still shareholders, correct?
yes and no lookie here prelim notes no 7 "Securities offered and sold outside the United States in accordance with Regulation S need not be registered under the Act. See Release No. 33-6863. Regulation S may be relied upon for such offers and sales even if coincident offers and sales are made in accordance with Regulation D inside the United States. Thus, for example, persons who are offered and sold securities in accordance with Regulation S would not be counted in the calculation of the number of purchasers under Regulation D. Similarly, proceeds from such sales would not be included in the aggregate offering price. The provisions of this note, however, do not apply if the issuer elects to rely solely on Regulation D for offers or sales to persons made outside the United States." http://www.sec.gov/divisions/corpfin/forms/regd.htm ~Phx
Posts: 2375 | Registered: Nov 2004
| IP: Logged |
Joined: Dec 2004 Gender: Male Posts: 299 Re: *Our situation normal.....I think not! « Reply #66 on Today at 9:07am »
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- it is in the petition for review. 8 of the 10 points refer directly to the form 15 and the"prejudicial" and "erronious" decisions made by the commission. Granted it does not cite the regulations in the request but it does point directly to this information. Is it the companys duty to provide the sec with its own regulations? Its nothing new IMO I just see the company allowing the SEC to faulter by ignoring its own relevent regulations so when the company is on the offensive thru the appeals process it can show where the SEC was out of line on theyre points. if there are multiple regulations that were flagrantly ignored and a case prosecuted without merit, along with tampering with the independent auditors if there is indeed proof of that. Kind of sets up a case of collusion in thge core issue of Market manipulation, No? ~Phx
Posts: 2375 | Registered: Nov 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
ok...after reading your reposted stuff there legal i'm thinking a great investment right now is with a company that makes padding for those white rooms in mental hospitals. either that or a company that makes those nice white jackets with the funny arms. there is no way kool-aide is to blame for that stuff.
-------------------- "keep your stick on the ice & your cup firmly in place" Posts: 3651 | From: Algonac, MI. 48001 | Registered: Jun 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
I think....IMO.....IF....do you suppose....
Legal, if you quit reposting all that garbage that means nothing, we can let this thread die a peaceful death.
Now we gotta listen to that crap another two months.... SHEESH !!!!
-------------------- If I give you bad information, please feel free to sue me. I have nothing left anyway. Ed Posts: 1772 | From: Oxford, PA, USA | Registered: Oct 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
Oh, ed there is much more good stuff coming in the near future. And the first stuff will be things that you can guys can really use. But remember, all is not as it seems.
Posts: 2375 | Registered: Nov 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
I was in the Las Vegas airport last night and happened to see Tony Bartone's pit crew all wearing their black crew shirts that ask in big white letters on the back, "GOT CMKX? and I wondered, 'Do these guys ever get any chit from pissed off investors while wearing these shirts around in public like this?' For some reason, after reading this thread from time to time, it seems like they might be taking their chances wearing those shirts at an airport.
Posts: 1235 | From: Anacortes, WA | Registered: Apr 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
Leo, the only pissed off shareholders are those who sold, and an occasional "ed". But they don't get out much.
Posts: 2375 | Registered: Nov 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
I don't think thats true legal. Just because 5 to 10% post on the boards doesn't mean the rest are happy about this. I would bet most are like Ed. And looking at PB lately there has been a bunch more joining in quickly. Most people don't wear blinders every minute of the day.
-------------------- Invest with your brain not with your heart. Posts: 4405 | From: Bristol, Tn, USA | Registered: Aug 2004
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by legaleagle: Leo, the only pissed off shareholders are those who sold, and an occasional "ed". But they don't get out much.
You havent even gotten close to seeing "pissed off" yet. I'm saving the real tantrum til this is over. Then, you will see "pissed off", for REAL. Did I mention I know where UC lives...LOL?
-------------------- If I give you bad information, please feel free to sue me. I have nothing left anyway. Ed Posts: 1772 | From: Oxford, PA, USA | Registered: Oct 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
the cult doesn't understand that they do not think like normal ppl. they think everyone but a few cmkx shareholders feel & think like they do. 20% of the shareholders faxed frizzy their info. 10% joined the first OG & less then 5% joined the OG repeat & that was before the master list came out. nothing attatched to reality about cmkx gets through the dreamland they live in. UC could stand up in criminal court & confess to his scam & 2% of the cmkx shareholders would still find a way to make that part of the master plan. they have yet to allow any facts get into their dreamland, so why start now.
-------------------- "keep your stick on the ice & your cup firmly in place" Posts: 3651 | From: Algonac, MI. 48001 | Registered: Jun 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
Does anyone think it funny that the Saviour of CMKX Maheu, who stated he was here for the shareholders is never heard from. That the cult claims that he is here to protect us but we never hear one word of encouragement from him. And if you think he is too god like to speak, why does he not have someone pass alone what is happening. Do you really feel that you are better off?
-------------------- Invest with your brain not with your heart. Posts: 4405 | From: Bristol, Tn, USA | Registered: Aug 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
Hang on Ric, you are hearing from him in more ways than one. And much more is coming soon. Watch the boards. Don't believe the first story, even if it fits your scenario. Even the bashers have to recognize the amount of disinformation being circulated on the boards.
Posts: 2375 | Registered: Nov 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
Ric.... great point about Maheu. It is laughable that leagle responded within 5 minutes of your post.... "Hang on Ric..." I think people have been hanging on long enough. CMKX and that monkey of a CEO Urban have NEVER delivered one ounce of value to the shareholders.
"And much more is coming soon...." yeah right. I wish I had the time to count how many times we've heard this one before!
What disinformation has been circulated on this board? Let me list the 'disinformation':
1. No financials 2. CMKX office in Urban's HOUSE! 3. Maheu has NO CLUE what is going on (he is 87 YEARS OLD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!) 4. Auditors keep leaving
Okay, I'm sick of this.... I think I'm going to throw up if I write any more of these OBVIOUS issues down... someone needs to shoot CMKX and put it out of its misery. The OG is like the Black Knight in The Holy Grail (they don't realize when arms/legs are cut off!).....
Posts: 86 | Registered: Aug 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
well Legal is right, there is and has been a large amount of disinformation on the boards concerning cmkx. in fact about 2 yrs worth. now the story is CIM will rise from the cmkx ashes & it had to be this way so some back door group would not take over cmkx. all i can say is good let cim come out at $1 a share as long as i can sell my shares for that i'll repent, i'll change my ways. i'll start drinking kool-aide. i'll even beg pb32 to let me back in right after i co-star with pam anderson in her next sex video. heck if i'm in dreamland i might as well add something to the ending that has a chance of happening....lol a lot better shot at being in that video then CIM at $1.
-------------------- "keep your stick on the ice & your cup firmly in place" Posts: 3651 | From: Algonac, MI. 48001 | Registered: Jun 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
I'd go so far as to say if this thing makes me any money in the next year, I'll buy stock in the Koolaid company....LOL
-------------------- If I give you bad information, please feel free to sue me. I have nothing left anyway. Ed Posts: 1772 | From: Oxford, PA, USA | Registered: Oct 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
Talking about Pam Anderson, they are doing a roast of her at the Friars Club. It airs this weekend on Comedy Channel. Seen a preview last night. I liked the joke on the preview.
"Pam has screwed more musicians then Napster" lol
-------------------- Invest with your brain not with your heart. Posts: 4405 | From: Bristol, Tn, USA | Registered: Aug 2004
| IP: Logged |
Joined: Feb 2005 Posts: 669 ***WHY I AM HERE*** « Thread Started on Today at 11:58am »
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- BECAUSE I BELIEVE!
At this time of many unknowns and pure speculation.....for NO ONE, and I mean NO ONE here knows what is truly going on behind the scenes.....why waste your time convincing others of foul play or doom as it relates to this Company if you are indeed bona fide "lay" CMKX Shareholder. It is simply something that is a complete waste of ones time...especially if the picture is indeed "over" as certain individuals claim...unless you are trying to create fury for a lawsuit or have others sell. It simply does not make sense that one is here "to warn" others of impending doom and take valuable time out of their schedule for what appears (to them) to be such a depressing conclusion. At least CMKX Shareholders that "believe" are utilizing the public information available in order to "speculate"....the key word being SPECULATE....via theories that are mere opinion...thoughts that move toward a positive light. Again, NO ONE KNOWS WHAT IS REALLY GOING ON....unless you are an insider......and if so, what the *ell are you doing illegally spreading information on a public message board.
The above thoughts are even more important to think of since we are in THE ELEVENTH HOUR/ THE NINTH INNING/ THE FOURTH QUARTER/ THE THIRD PERIOD.....etc., etc.,.....and many quote un quote CMKX Shareholders (some never seen before, some trusted) will come out in a fury of negativity or do a 180 degree turn on their long held out opinion to sway your feelings that brought you here in the first place. Boy, what noble people they are to warn the loyal Shareholders of their negative twist....YA RIGHT! The enemy will bring out "the best"...the best debaters and smoothest talkers during this crunch time period.
To all of the genuine and sincere CMKX Shareholders: Please meditate deep on your DD, and when the day is over...think and do what YOUR heart and mind (in combination) truly tell you...not what the sentiment of message board posters are...posters that you do not even personally know...and may fall prey to intentions or agendas that do not have your welfare in mind.
Again, I am here because I BELIEVE....Why are you here?
posted
We keep getting asked why we are here if we don't believe (see Dxild's comments above). To all the kool-aide drinkers I ask this question, have you ever stopped or slowed your car to look at an accident? Sure you have and you did it because you are curious! Have you ever watched a movie about superheros? If no, get a life. If yes, why did you bother watching if you knew the superhero would win in the end? Answer, you're curious how it plays out.
The bottom line is that us bashers watch with amazement as you kool-aide drinks pour more money into a company which has about the same chance of 'going big' as OJ Simpson has of finding the 'true killers.' This is entertainment for us and sad reality for you.
Posts: 86 | Registered: Aug 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
I'll Go With Thorn And Ottoman And Add: EAGLES FLY HIGH AND OVERSEE ALL THE CHICKEN CRAP. On Revocation: You Cannot Go Into Revoking Until You Discovered The FoulPlay And Researched All The Legalities About It,[Like In An Unconscionable Contract], But By Staying In The Game Until You Say Cut ----- You Now Have The Full Inside Story ---Things Good Books Are Made Of ,And ,You Saw It A-L-L And Know A-L-L The Dirty Players,The Thieves And Crooks And How They Collude And Operate Their Intentional Larceny!!Now You Know And Now You Can Write The Full Story With All Your Evidence! FORSHTAY?? Maybe It Does Take Some Years Of Seasoning To Undertake Such A Venture - Some Call It Old - The Old May Call It WISDOM [Important For The Head To Oversee How The Unruly Family Operates After The King Is Gone].!!As For Transfer Agents - GOD Knows - You Have To Watch Them Too!!! AS FOR FIVE STARS Vs Five Trades - THAT Does'nt Say Much! It's All In What The Plan Is By The Individuals. AND MY SAY IS : To Each His Own. It's Like The Turtle And The Hare. I'd Like To See The End Result Before I Stick My Head Out.!!
Posts: 188 | From: MISSOURI | Registered: Jul 2005
| IP: Logged |
-------------------- If I give you bad information, please feel free to sue me. I have nothing left anyway. Ed Posts: 1772 | From: Oxford, PA, USA | Registered: Oct 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
If I Read Correctly "19363" Is A "666" Code And It Is Understandable That "ed" Does Not Want To Understand The True Message. YEP - A Lot Is Missing - It Is In The "DOCUMENTARY" Though!! And Of Course When It Is Time For The Book - Everyone Will See The Light. CMKX IS A DEAD ISSUE. A.J. SENIOR
Posts: 188 | From: MISSOURI | Registered: Jul 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
Ahhhhhhhh! Now that makes everything clear.
quote:Originally posted by A.J.: If I Read Correctly "19363" Is A "666" Code And It Is Understandable That "ed" Does Not Want To Understand The True Message. YEP - A Lot Is Missing - It Is In The "DOCUMENTARY" Though!! And Of Course When It Is Time For The Book - Everyone Will See The Light. CMKX IS A DEAD ISSUE. A.J. SENIOR
-------------------- A million seconds is 13 days. A billion seconds is 31 years. Posts: 4893 | From: Burbank IL USA | Registered: Feb 2004
| IP: Logged |
Topic Closed
UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!
Printer-friendly view of this topic
