Allstocks.com's Bulletin Board
Topic Closed  Topic Closed
Post New Topic  New Poll  
Topic Closed  Topic Closed
my profile login | register | search | faq | forum home

  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Allstocks.com's Bulletin Board » Micro Penny Stocks, Penny Stocks $0.10 & Under » QBID (XIII) Countdown to Nationwide Hard Launch July 1 (Page 63)

 - UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!   This topic comprises 67 pages: 1  2  3  ...  60  61  62  63  64  65  66  67   
Author Topic: QBID (XIII) Countdown to Nationwide Hard Launch July 1
kbpkt
Member


Member Rated:
5
Icon 1 posted      Profile for kbpkt     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Krecik- Which names had the same IP addresses? I only got a chance to write down one persons IP before I refreshed the page and it was gone. If you won't list the screenames, will you post the number so I can see if the number I have for someone is one that is repeated? Thanks in advance!
Posts: 1120 | From: San Diego, CA | Registered: Feb 2000  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Penny-Trader
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Penny-Trader     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
it looks like most ar ein agreement bob as to posting the culprits.

I have not seen anyone stating that it would be a bad idea so how about it Alstock

show us your secrets.

it may let your pps go up lol

and by the way i know that there are millions of penny traders but i am the only Penny-trader

if we go with a secret pickle shake lets not make it a long one so it doesnt get messy 3 seconds max ok


Posts: 4801 | From: Prescott, ON, Canada | Registered: May 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
kbpkt
Member


Member Rated:
5
Icon 1 posted      Profile for kbpkt     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I know its not the appropriate thread, but anyone who owns IBZT should check out the PR that just came out. Looks like tomorrow is going to be a huge sell off/down day.
Posts: 1120 | From: San Diego, CA | Registered: Feb 2000  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Bob_dog
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Bob_dog     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Just a friendly reminder, even if someone only has one screen name and one ip address doesn't mean that their not still full of sh/t.
Now I admit that I am full of it, but remember i'm not trying to pump or bash anything, i'm harmless.
But some arn't
Bob the dog not Frey

Posts: 295 | From: Midwest | Registered: Apr 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
justplayin
Member


Icon 1 posted      Profile for justplayin     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
kbp, it is the right thread. Any help to alert others to possible losses is appreciated by those who may miss it.

Luckily, I am not in it, but good to spread the word.

------------------
A day without dreams is just a nightmare!


Posts: 1702 | From: Michigan | Registered: Oct 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Penny-Trader
Member


Rate Member
Icon 10 posted      Profile for Penny-Trader     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
that is a sad reality there should not be any fear to ask a legitimate question.
that is part in parcell part of why im out of the Q if these get answered and i like the answers i will get back in. the other reason is that for a better part of the month this stock hasnt left the area that it is in right now. i see better opportunities elsewhere till this starts to move again.

Sharing DD is great but pumping does no one any good. it has to grow on real info and real foundation.

GLTA that are still holding

Penny-Trader


quote:
Originally posted by justplayin:
Futures, great post. I must caution you that others have stated some of the same questions (not all at once) and have been slammed.

Thanks for asking the questions others are afraid to ask.



Posts: 4801 | From: Prescott, ON, Canada | Registered: May 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
fjean
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for fjean     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
Originally posted by kbpkt:
I know its not the appropriate thread, but anyone who owns IBZT should check out the PR that just came out. Looks like tomorrow is going to be a huge sell off/down day.

JUST BEFORE THE HARD LAUNCH, WHAT IF QBID PUTS OUT A PR SIMILAR TO IBZT's SURPRISINGLY HORRIBLE ONE TODAY?

------------------
IN SUB-PENNY WE TRUST


Posts: 196 | From: Pompano Beach, Florida | Registered: Apr 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
JBCak47
Member


Rate Member
Icon 10 posted      Profile for JBCak47     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
futuresobjective:

I understand where you are comming from, but in answer to one of your questions, they are under legal contract NOT to explain the situations of the deals in progress and ones that are signed, until the 21st or 22nd of June. This is purely legal reasons and MUST be followed in order for any such deals to finished. If they breech the contract they lose the deal. This is why they wont speak until they are allowed.

In refernce to the O/S count. Yes they did say by May, mid-May infact. However they are under control of a Public Relations firm that may have stepped in and said not to release that data yet.

The company wants to become fully reporting, hence these strategic moves. In order to be fully reporting and move off the OTCBB/Pink sheets and onto something bigger, they need to report.

The Q-Television Network also annouced they will do a limited share buy back. Perhaps it is still on going? Perhaps it ended a while ago. I am not sure. Perhaps they are waiting to release it at a better share price? 10% increase if it is good news will do more for the early investors when the price is at .12 versus .012

However not many pink sheets are carrying out a buy back of shares.

Frank Olsen also annouced, with a board vote, NO REVERSE SPLIT, in the forseeable future.

They have interest from institutional companies.

1. The Q-Television stock has risen over 12,000% since Feb. 2004.

2. The Network has annouced a limited stock buy back.

3. The Q-Television board has voted on NO REVERSE SPLIT.

4. The company has teamed with Barbara LaMonte, a notible figure in the Broadcasting field. She speaks over six languages.

5. The Q-Television Network annouced that NTI, a satellite UPLINK/DOWNLINK signal distribution company will handle the technical aspects of transmitting the Q-Television signal upto the Telestar satellite, in which it will be downlinked to all available satellite and cable provieds in NORTH AMERICA, including CANADA, MEXICO and part of the Carribiean (sp?).

6. The Q-Television network will charge a preium to access its broadcast, limiting the viewability to those who want it. Therefore it will not be 'shoved' into heterosexual peoples homes. The cable company will also collect part of the subsciption rate. Each cable company will recivie funds for every customer who watches. Viacomm's LOGO Network will be carried on basic packages. This is already causing controversy.

7. The Q-Television Network has hired a leading Public Relations firm to handle news releases and press issues. This company has had Direct TV as a client and has access to noteable, prominent individuals and companies.

8. Q-Television has an updated website.

9. On May first thru the fourth, the network attended the an industry held convention where the Q-Television network exposed itself to many cable and industry leaders.

10. The Q-Television Network launched a Test Signal on May 15th, which was broadcast, in clear, unscambled signals, to C-Band Satellite dish owners as well as to all cable/satellite providers. In addition, the signal was carried over two broadcast providers.

A. The first provider was Comcast Cable in the Washington State/Seattle area.
B. The second provider was Cox Cable in New Orleans, which is home to a rathe rlarge Gay market.

The five hour broadcast included a selection of content including an orginal documentary highlighting the Nationwide Gay Marriage events.

The Test Signal was a complete success.

Durring this time, news clips and spots have began to appear in numerous news sources.

11. On June 1st, The Q-Television began its Industry Soft Launch which will allow Cable providers, as well as Satellite providers, access to a block of programming, on going throughout the whole month of June.

12. Frank Olsen has annouced he has closed five meetings in New York, with ten others in open discussion.

Additionally, the company has open an office in New York City which will include secretaries to handle the operations for the East Coast area. They havee also hired a person who will help them with an advertising campaign.

13. The Q-Television Network plans to launch an advertising Campaign at the end of June, which will be a nationwide, multi-city event.

14. The Q-Television Network has access to film crews at any time, in major US cities. These film crews will give the network footage for their news segements, comentaries, documentaries as well as for concerts, events, parties, and festiviles and parades.

15. The company plans to launch the network to the consumer in July, which is about two weeks away.


-John


Posts: 759 | From: Long Island, NY | Registered: Dec 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
realityinc21
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for realityinc21     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
Originally posted by sarki316:
All you people that own QBID have to remeber 1 thing IF they don't get a carrier for there services you can kiss this stock good bye. I know alot of Gay people that work in the market and they are waiting for QBID to launch before they get in. If frank Olsen has 1 more deal left in him it is QBID getting a carrier and GOOD one not a small ass one.

Right before the hard launch date this stock will fly. So just keep hold your breath we have about 4 weeks left before the REAL TRUTH COME OUT WITH QBID.

Diana this is riding on your shoulders BIG TIME!!!!!!

Joey from Brooklyn


I AM PRETTY SMALL--BUT TOUGH--I THINK I CAN HANDLE IT. I HAVE POSTED ALL THE DD I KNOW AND CAN FIND.

I AM SORRY I GOT SO AGGRIVATED EARLIER--I JUST GET CONFUSED WITH ALL THE BS--THEN I GET MAD. WITH ALL THIS WHO IS WHO CRAP.

I KNOW WHO I AM I JUST CAN'T FIGURE ANYTHING ELSE OUT.

SO I GUESS I WILL STOP TRYING. I AM GOING TO GO SURF THE GAY WEB. NO BASHERS THERE. I AM KINDA STARTING TO LIKE IT. LOL

------------------
DIANA


Posts: 4447 | From: USA | Registered: Jan 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
futuresobjective
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for futuresobjective     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
Originally posted by JBCak47:
futuresobjective:

I understand where you are comming from, but in answer to one of your questions, they are under legal contract NOT to explain the situations of the deals in progress and ones that are signed, until the 21st or 22nd of June. This is purely legal reasons and MUST be followed in order for any such deals to finished. If they breech the contract they lose the deal. This is why they wont speak until they are allowed.
In refernce to the O/S count. Yes they did say by May, mid-May infact. However they are under control of a Public Relations firm that may have stepped in and said not to release that data yet.
The company wants to become fully reporting, hence these strategic moves. In order to be fully reporting and move off the OTCBB/Pink sheets and onto something bigger, they need to report.
The Q-Television Network also annouced they will do a limited share buy back. Perhaps it is still on going? Perhaps it ended a while ago. I am not sure. Perhaps they are waiting to release it at a better share price? 10% increase if it is good news will do more for the early investors when the price is at .12 versus .012
However not many pink sheets are carrying out a buy back of shares.
Frank Olsen also annouced, with a board vote, NO REVERSE SPLIT, in the forseeable future.
They have interest from institutional companies.
1. The Q-Television stock has risen over 12,000% since Feb. 2004.
2. The Network has annouced a limited stock buy back.
3. The Q-Television board has voted on NO REVERSE SPLIT.
4. The company has teamed with Barbara LaMonte, a notible figure in the Broadcasting field. She speaks over six languages.
5. The Q-Television Network annouced that NTI, a satellite UPLINK/DOWNLINK signal distribution company will handle the technical aspects of transmitting the Q-Television signal upto the Telestar satellite, in which it will be downlinked to all available satellite and cable provieds in NORTH AMERICA, including CANADA, MEXICO and part of the Carribiean
6. The Q-Television network will charge a preium to access its broadcast, limiting the viewability to those who want it. Therefore it will not be 'shoved' into heterosexual peoples homes. The cable company will also collect part of the subsciption rate. Each cable company will recivie funds for every customer who watches. Viacomm's LOGO Network will be carried on basic packages. This is already causing controversy.
7. The Q-Television Network has hired a leading Public Relations firm to handle news releases and press issues. This company has had Direct TV as a client and has access to noteable, prominent individuals and companies.
8. Q-Television has an updated website.
9. On May first thru the fourth, the network attended the an industry held convention where the Q-Television network exposed itself to many cable and industry leaders.
10. The Q-Television Network launched a Test Signal on May 15th, which was broadcast, in clear, unscambled signals, to C-Band Satellite dish owners as well as to all cable/satellite providers. In addition, the signal was carried over two broadcast providers.
A. The first provider was Comcast Cable in the Washington State/Seattle area.
B. The second provider was Cox Cable in New Orleans, which is home to a rathe rlarge Gay market.
The five hour broadcast included a selection of content including an orginal documentary highlighting the Nationwide Gay Marriage events.
The Test Signal was a complete success.
Durring this time, news clips and spots have began to appear in numerous news sources.
11. On June 1st, The Q-Television began its Industry Soft Launch which will allow Cable providers, as well as Satellite providers, access to a block of programming, on going throughout the whole month of June.
12. Frank Olsen has annouced he has closed five meetings in New York, with ten others in open discussion.
Additionally, the company has open an office in New York City which will include secretaries to handle the operations for the East Coast area. They havee also hired a person who will help them with an advertising campaign.
13. The Q-Television Network plans to launch an advertising Campaign at the end of June, which will be a nationwide, multi-city event.
14. The Q-Television Network has access to film crews at any time, in major US cities. These film crews will give the network footage for their news segements, comentaries, documentaries as well as for concerts, events, parties, and festiviles and parades.
15. The company plans to launch the network to the consumer in July, which is about two weeks away.
-John



*********
JBCak47:
I also understand your points. They are valid. In fact that is how I looked at it until I took a few steps back and realized how wrong I was (just my opinion, not trying to imply that I am right or you are wrong, just stating that I feel for myself I am on the right track)

I see how you can think, as I did, that they are under legal contract. In fact one of the past two times (this is the third attempt) they tried to launch they blew a deal they allegedly had with a carrier. I say allegedy because if I remember it correctly, that company denied that it ever had a deal. they were in talks.

In reference to your reference to the OS count (lol) They are not under the control of a pr firm. The PR firm in under control of them. I have only seen two pr's with devany's name on it? maybe I missed one, however these pr's are coming from the q.

This company might want to become fully reporting but I see no proof to them even suggesting that. please correct me if I am wrong, I would like to know. If they do want to move off of the pinks, one would think they would begin by lettng their investors in on things, such as the os count.

Keep in mind that the announced buy back really means nothing for a pink until after it is completed. There is no regulation for thigns like that. They can say anything they want (as far as I know) regarding a buyback and they have no reason to follow through with it. they can say it every day and it does not mean a thing until after it has happened.

Frank did announce no R/S.

They have interest from institutional companies<--- nobody I know... nobody even worth mentioning IMO

1. The Q-Television stock has risen over 12,000% since Feb. 2004.<-- so have many other companies. that does not mean much anymore... it only meant something when you were at the bottom... now I am afraid there is all that way back down.. where before at 0.0001 the only way to lose money was through a r/s or if they folded.

2. The Network has annouced a limited stock buy back.<- again they can announce this but it means nothing until after it is completed. I do recall reading or hearing somewhere that it will not start until oct. 4 months or more away. when is their launch? a couple of weeks?

3. The Q-Television board has voted on NO REVERSE SPLIT.

4. The company has teamed with Barbara LaMonte, a notible figure in the Broadcasting field. She speaks over six languages.<--- Between my and my sister we speak 9 languages. your point? Last I checked you had to pay for her services? Also checked out that companies website... I am sad to say my screen almost cracked it was so ugly, and poorly designed.

5. The Q-Television Network annouced that NTI, a satellite UPLINK/DOWNLINK signal distribution company will handle the technical aspects of transmitting the Q-Television signal upto the Telestar satellite, in which it will be downlinked to all available satellite and cable provieds in NORTH AMERICA, including CANADA, MEXICO and part of the Carribiean (sp?).<-- again I think you have to pay for those services. and until I see this thing airing how do I know they are not there to make sure the pulg doesn't fall out?

6. The Q-Television network will charge a preium to access its broadcast, limiting the viewability to those who want it. Therefore it will not be 'shoved' into heterosexual peoples homes. The cable company will also collect part of the subsciption rate. Each cable company will recivie funds for every customer who watches. Viacomm's LOGO Network will be carried on basic packages. This is already causing controversy.<-- I am over that, it seems to me that viacom has take a lot of heat over their network chanel logo, and still they are able to offer true advertisers. We are going to attempt to charge people, and a few days before we launch, we have no clue what any of our shows will be, not clue what kind of moves( aside form the three on their website), and nothing in place that should be in place well before you launch a network, From all that I have read at least. I am starting to think they want to launch this and then try to get advertisers and carriers. IMO they are way to behind on bringing this thing *online*.

7. The Q-Television Network has hired a leading Public Relations firm to handle news releases and press issues. This company has had Direct TV as a client and has access to noteable, prominent individuals and companies.<-- they ahve hired a pr firm that they have used (from what I saw) twice. no big deal there. I cant see any progress made for the q by this firm.

8. Q-Television has an updated website.<-- nothing to write home about. take a look at logo's its up and its 100% better than q's. P.S., who did they get to build it? its a badly designed site, by amatuers in my opinion.

9. On May first thru the fourth, the network attended the an industry held convention where the Q-Television network exposed itself to many cable and industry leaders.<-- yes they did, I was excited about this. However I have seen no progress because of this. have you? its just not there.

10. The Q-Television Network launched a Test Signal on May 15th, which was broadcast, in clear, unscambled signals, to C-Band Satellite dish owners as well as to all cable/satellite providers. In addition, the signal was carried over two broadcast providers. <-- that signal was anything buy clear from what I remember. Also they had to pay for this signal to go out. on top of that they never supplied investors with information on # of actual viewers, which once again I am afraid I heard them mention they would.

A. The first provider was Comcast Cable in the Washington State/Seattle area.
B. The second provider was Cox Cable in New Orleans, which is home to a rathe rlarge Gay market.<--- right they payed for this, much like ron popeil(sp?) pays to advertise his pasta maker.

The five hour broadcast included a selection of content including an orginal documentary highlighting the Nationwide Gay Marriage events.<-- yes it did. turn on the news, until last week gay marriages where all over the place. I also remember reading somewhere that the movie was also airing on another companies channel... but I might be wrong.

The Test Signal was a complete success.<-- the test signal was a test signal, how can you say it was a success when you have nothing to tell you it was? no feedback from viewers, no anything.

Durring this time, news clips and spots have began to appear in numerous news sources. <---- I have seen a few posts, mostly blots of info, that nobody will see but the investor looking for it. not impressed yet.

11. On June 1st, The Q-Television began its Industry Soft Launch which will allow Cable providers, as well as Satellite providers, access to a block of programming, on going throughout the whole month of June.<--- yest they did, I still have no idea how that is going. do you? I mean do your really?


12. Frank Olsen has annouced he has closed five meetings in New York, with ten others in open discussion. <--- they have not been turned down, closing a meeting does not mean to me that we have contrcacts... until I see that we have them I would not assume so.

Additionally, the company has open an office in New York City which will include secretaries to handle the operations for the East Coast area. They havee also hired a person who will help them with an advertising campaign. <-- ny office. I will check it out when they find the time to open it. its not open yet. Also, I thought devany is heling them with their advertising and carriers? I see no proof of anything yet. you cant if your eyes are open.

13. The Q-Television Network plans to launch an advertising Campaign at the end of June, which will be a nationwide, multi-city event.<-- still to be seen, why are they waiting until days before they launch? A company as large as viacom is doing it a year ahead of time, and they dont have to. the q, I would think does.

14. The Q-Television Network has access to film crews at any time, in major US cities. These film crews will give the network footage for their news segements, comentaries, documentaries as well as for concerts, events, parties, and festiviles and parades.<--- give me a day and a couple of grand, I will have access as well. it was news when it came out, but not any longer.

15. The company plans to launch the network to the consumer in July, which is about two weeks away.<---july is two weeks away or so, why do we have no information, no advertisers (aside from gotchocolates and mikkee), why do we have no information about anything that at least I require to consider this a sound investment? when it comes down to it, we really have no information, that provides any idea of how well, poorly they are doing.

Please don't consider my post a bach, even though it may sound like one. These are my concerns and my thoughts towards JBCak47's post.
JBCak47 in no way am I trying to make you change your mind, I am just putting out what I see as relavant information regarding your reply to my post. your reply in itself is very much apreciated. Best of luck to you.

[This message has been edited by futuresobjective (edited June 15, 2004).]


Posts: 1153 | From: northeast | Registered: Apr 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
kbpkt
Member


Member Rated:
5
Icon 1 posted      Profile for kbpkt     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
whoa, we just had a big earthquake here in San Diego
Posts: 1120 | From: San Diego, CA | Registered: Feb 2000  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
BT
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for BT     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Hasn't shown up here yet.
http://www.iris.edu/seismon/

quote:
Originally posted by kbpkt:
whoa, we just had a big earthquake here in San Diego


Posts: 3026 | Registered: Apr 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
kbpkt
Member


Member Rated:
5
Icon 1 posted      Profile for kbpkt     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
Originally posted by 1BigTip:
Hasn't shown up here yet.
http://www.iris.edu/seismon/


it just happened, check in a minute, it'll be there

[This message has been edited by kbpkt (edited June 15, 2004).]


Posts: 1120 | From: San Diego, CA | Registered: Feb 2000  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
kbpkt
Member


Member Rated:
5
Icon 1 posted      Profile for kbpkt     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
It was a 5.1 earthquake epicentered on the San Diego/Tijuanna border

Now the news is saying it was 3 earthquakes that happened within seconds, one on the San Diego border, one in the dessert outside San Diego, and one in neighboring Riverside county

[This message has been edited by kbpkt (edited June 15, 2004).]


Posts: 1120 | From: San Diego, CA | Registered: Feb 2000  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
TUFFY THE TRADER
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for TUFFY THE TRADER     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
jhsoppsk
Posts: 148 | Registered: Apr 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
darogo
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for darogo     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
great post futures. all valid concerns. i agree with most of them. i also think that frank and co. will be able to get the pps higher within the next few weeks. with the release of cable/satellite carriers, advertisers and their own advertising campaign, i still expect the pps to rise. i still think that people who weren't aware of the stock WILL be made aware. we all might not be millionaires, but i still think there's money to be made with this stock.

i think people just need to play this level-headed....


Posts: 353 | From: Bay Area, CA | Registered: Feb 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
futuresobjective
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for futuresobjective     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
Originally posted by darogo:
great post futures. all valid concerns. i agree with most of them. i also think that frank and co. will be able to get the pps higher within the next few weeks. with the release of cable/satellite carriers, advertisers and their own advertising campaign, i still expect the pps to rise. i still think that people who weren't aware of the stock WILL be made aware. we all might not be millionaires, but i still think there's money to be made with this stock.

i think people just need to play this level-headed....


**********
thats all I am saying... thanks for the response.


Posts: 1153 | From: northeast | Registered: Apr 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
sharkus
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for sharkus     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Excellent post Futuresobjective!

They still have not posted the new guys resume on the web page. Guess they really do not care how they look to the rest of the investor community since as people have stated they see the QBID news under Viacom news as well.


Posts: 305 | From: Any Airport, Air Line Lounge or Time Zone | Registered: Apr 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
sharkus
Member


Rate Member
Icon 5 posted      Profile for sharkus     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Hey Diana - Did you ever get an *official* response from either the PR firm or Frank in writing to the email you sent out to them - I do not recall hearing anything but I could be wrong. There are still quite a number of things valid in this list that I believe still are not addressed. Thanks in advance -
This is post I am refering to :

TO KENDRA AND DEVENY STAFF:
TO TRIANGLE MULTI MEDIA:
TO THE INVESTORS IN THIS STOCK HOLDING MILLIONS OF SHARES WORTH MILLIONS OF DOLLARS:
FIRST OF ALL THIS IS NOT DIRECTED AT ANYONE IN ANY WAY SHAPE OR FORM. THIS IS DIRECTED AT THE CREDIBILITY AND VALIDITY OF QBID.
I AND HUNDREDS OF OTHERS HAVE BEEN BEHIND THIS COMPANY SINCE FEBRUARY 2, 2004 WHEN THE SHARE PRICE WAS @ .0001. WE NEED, WANT AND DESERVE SOME ANSWERS TO OUR QUESTIONS.
THERE IS NO WAY A HARD LAUNCH DATE CAN BE GIVEN. 1 MONTH TO 1 MONTH AND A HALF AFTER THE SOFT LAUNCH IS WHAT HAS BEEN PROJECTED. THAT PROJECTION IS GIVEN ON THE TIME FRAME OF OTHER NETWORKS LAUNCHING AFTER BEING PICKED UP BY A CABLE OR SATELLITE COMPANY.
WE CAN NOT GENERALIZE. ....SPECULATION ON FACTS IS ACCEPTABLE. WE ALL HAVE OPINIONS.
QTV HAS TO BE PICKED UP BY A CABLE OR SATELLITE COMPANY--TO LAUNCH AT ALL....THEY HAVE TO BE PICKED UP BY ADVERTISING COMPANIES. THAT IS PURPOSE OF SOFT LAUNCH AND THE ATTENDANCE AT THE NETWORK CONVENTION IN NEW ORLEANS.
TO DO SO THIS COMPANY (QTV) NEEDS TO VALIDATE SHARE PRICE, VOLUME, SEC FILINGS, INCOME STATEMENTS ETC ETC. HENCE, REASON FOR HIRING MISS LAMONT AND CONTRACTING DEVENY PR FIRM....VALIDATION--PROMOTION--CONTRACTUAL EXPERIENCE--ADVERTISING RESOURCES.. YADA YADA
IF WE AS A GROUP ( A BIG GROUP) CAN NOT STAND BEHIND THE COMPANY--IE. VALIDATE SHARE PRICE AND CORRECT INFORMATION THEN THE CHANCES FOR THEM TO LAUNCH AT ALL DECREASES DUE TO OUR INCOMPETENCE TO PUT OUT CORRECT INFORMATION. IF THEY CAN NOT GIVE US ACCURATE AND COMPETITENT INFORMATION THEN HOW CAN WE BACK UP THEIR COMPANY???
EVERYONE HERE IS THINKING. WE ARE ONLY A SMALL GROUP OF SHARE HOLDERS.. WHAT WE DO AND SAY IS A DROP IN THE BUCKET.. WRONG...I AM GETTING E-MAILS FROM ALL OVER THE WORLD IN REPLY TO E-MAILS I SENT OUT MONTHS AGO. PEOPLE LAUGHING AND SAYING "WELL THIS LOOKS FAMILIAR." BECAUSE IT STARTED RIGHT HERE.
EVERYBODY HERE REACHES OUT TO OTHERS AND OTHERS REACH OUT TO OTHERS.
SMALL STATEMENTS LIKE "I DON'T TAKE ANYTHING THEY SAY AS 100%" REFLECTS ON THE VALIDITY OF THIS COMPANY. THOUSANDS AND THOUSANDS OF PEOPLE READ THIS AND REPOST SOMEWHERE ELSE. WITH AN AVERAGE OF 1/2 TO 3/4 OF A BILLION SHARES TRADED DAILY..AND SOMETIMES IN THE BILLIONS OF SHARES TRADED..SOMEONE OUT THERE IS LISTENING.
I AM NOT TRYING TO OFFEND ANYONE. JUST TRYING TO MAKE A BUCK AND KEEP IT REAL.
IF ANY ONE OF YOU THOUGHT THAT I HAVE A TEMPER AND/OR AM AGGRESSIVE WITH MY COMMENTS, YOU ARE CORRECT. THAT WAS NOTHING AND I MEAN NOTHING COMPARED TO THE E-MAIL I JUST SENT TO FRANK WITH COPY TO DEVENY FIRM. IN SHORT I KINDLY EXPLAINED TO THEM THAT IF THEY CHOOSE TO MAKE THIS WORK HE HAS TO HIRE COMPETENT EMPLOYEE'S AND TRAIN THEM WITH ADEQUATE AND ACCURATE INFORMATION TO GIVE TO THE PUBLIC. HE NEEDS TO MEET HIS DEADLINES. HE NEEDS BE PROFESSIONAL. HE NEEDS TO INFORM US OF THE O/S. HE NEEDS TO HIRE A COMPETENT ATTORNEY AND ACCOUNTANT TO FILE APPROPRIATE SEC REQUIREMENTS. HE NEEDS TO DECIDE IF DEVENY IS PUTTING OUT PRESS RELEASES OR IF HE IS. HE NEEDS TO INFORM US OF THE SHARE BUY BACK PROGRAM. HE NEEDS TO SET UP AN APPROPRIATE AND PROFESSIONAL WEB SITE. HE OBVIOUSLY HAS SOME BACKING EITHER INDEPENDENTLY, PRIVATELY OR CORPORATE AND WE NEED TO BE INFORMED AS TO WHAT STAGE OF THE GAME HE IS AT-- AND LASTLY HE NEEDS TO INFORM ME RIGHT HERE AND RIGHT NOW IF THIS IS BULLs*&T OR DOES HE HAVE ANY INTENTION OF MAKING THIS WORK BECAUSE I AM NOT GOING TO WASTE ANY MORE OF MY TIME ON THIS VENTURE IF HE IS NOT GOING TO DO WHAT HE SAYS. HE FAILED AT THIS BUSINESS VENTURE ONCE BEFORE AND THERE IS ABSOLUTELY NO ROOM FOR ERROR THIS TIME AROUND.
I INFORMED HIM THAT: BEING CEO OF A COMPANY HE DOES HAVE SHARES IN THAT COMPANY THAT HE COULD SELL TO GAIN THE CAPITAL TO RETAIN THE STAFF THAT HE NEEDS. BEING CONSERVATIVELY FRUGAL IS ONE THING AND F*&*ING WITH MY TIME AND MY MONEY WAS ANOTHER. IF HE WANTS TO PLAY THE SHELL GAME--THAT IS JUST FINE WITH ME. I CAN PLAY THAT GAME RIGHT WITH THE BEST OF THEM. SO WHICH ONE IS IT FRANK? RISK OR TRIVIAL PURSUIT?
GRANTED HE HAS SET UP THE HOT LINE-- HIRED A GOOD PR. FIRM-- PUT OUT FAIRLY DECENT PRESS RELEASES--TELLING US ONLY WHAT WE ALREADY KNOW. EXECUTED THE SHOWING AT THE NETWORK CONVENTION WITH SUCCESS-- CONTRACTED WITH TIME WARNER--SET UP SOME PROGRAMMING AND ARRANGED COMPLETION OF DOCUMENTARY WITH JOE TORRES ON GAY/LESBIAN MARRIAGES--THE SOFT LAUNCH PROGRAMMING IS FINISHED AND IN FACT WAS AIRING AT THE CONVENTION ON PLASMA SCREEN TV'S--SO WHY THE TWO WEEK DELAY? WAS THAT REALLY THE SOLT LAUNCH ON THE 15TH OF MAY? SINCE NO MENTION OF SOFT LAUNCH WAS MADE IN THE HOTLINE UPDATE. ONLY THE HARD LAUNCH IN JULY.
I INFORMED HIM THAT HE HAS REALLY DONE NOTHING THAT I COULD NOT HAVE DONE IN TWO WEEKS TIME SETTING BEHIND A DESK WITH A COMPUTER AND A TELEPHONE/FAX MACHINE. IN GENERAL QTV HAS NOT MET THE SOFT LAUNCH DEADLINE WHICH IN FACT IS THE MOST IMPORTANT ISSUE IN HAND. WHY IS IT NOT BEING BROADCASTED BY A DECENT NETWORK SYSTEM SO THAT THE PEOPLE HE IS TRYING TO ATTRACT WILL BE ABLE TO SEE IT? OUR CONCERN.. IS THIS PATTERN OF INCONSISTENCIES AND DEADLINE DELAYS GOING TO CONTINUE?
I DO UNDERSTAND THAT IT HAD BEEN QUITE HECTIC. I INFORMED HIM THAT "FRANK, THAT IS YOUR JOB TO CONTROL UPRISING SITUATIONS AS CEO OF QTV. NO ONE SAID IT WOULD BE EASY."
I DID NOT E-MAIL YOU FOR EXCUSES I E-MAILED YOU FOR ANSWERS." I DO EXPECT A PROMPT RESPONSE. ONE FROM YOURSELF AND ONE FROM DEVENY PR FIRM.
I FEEL LIKE FRANK IS IN OVER HIS HEAD. SETTING UP THE SATELLITE FOR SOFT LAUNCH TESTING HAD TAKEN LONGER THAN HE EXPECTED. NOT JUST EVERYONE IS WILLING TO CONTRACT WITH GAY/LESBIAN TV NETWORK. HE SHOULD HAVE HIRED MORE STAFF MONTHS AGO. HE SHOULD HAVE HAD MISS LAMONT ON BOARD MONTHS AGO. HE SHOULD HAVE HIRED A PR. FIRM MONTHS AGO. HE SHOULD HAVE MADE SURE HE HAD SATELLITE SYSTEMS SET UP BEFORE HE SET A DATE FOR LAUNCH. IN SHORT, IF HE DOES NOT KNOW WHAT HE IS DOING THEN HE NEEDS TO HIRE ADEQUATE STAFF THAT DOES. I KNOW THAT FRANK WANTS TO LAUNCH QTV. HE HAS THE CONCEPTUAL IDEA'S FORMED BUT IS HE UNDER MANNED AND UNDER STAFFED AT THIS TIME TO MAKE THIS A REALITY. BASICALLY, I POINTED OUR THAT THE BALL STARTED ROLLING AND HE IS UNABLE TO KEEP UP. SINCE HIRING EXTRA STAFF RECENTLY THINGS HAVE BEEN BETTER BUT TOTALLY INSANE AS FAR AS THE WORK LOAD. COMMON SENSE TELLS ME THIS. HIRING THE PR. FIRM SHOULD LIGHTEN THAT LOAD. FRANK GENUINELY SEEMS INTENT ON MAKING THIS WORK. MY CONCERN IS CAN HE?
IMHO--IT CAN BE VERY OVERWHELMING THE IMMENSITY OF THE PROJECT HE HAS UNDERTAKEN. FRANK DOES NOT SEEM TO HAVE THE SELF ESTEEM NOR THE COMPETENCY THAT A PERSON I WOULD EXPECT AS A CEO OF A TV NETWORK. IN SHORT, FRANK IS DEFINITELY NO TED TURNER. FRANK SEEMS TO FRAGILE AND CONCERNED OVER TRIVIAL MATTERS. IF HE CAN'T GET QTV LAUNCHED THERE ARE SEVERAL COMPANIES COMING RIGHT BEHIND HIM THAT WILL. VIACOM BEING AT THE HEAD OF THE LIST.
WELL THERE IT IS FOLKS..I LAID DOWN THE FACTS. WE WILL WAIT FOR THE RETURN E-MAIL OR CALL.

------------------
DIANA


Posts: 305 | From: Any Airport, Air Line Lounge or Time Zone | Registered: Apr 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
The Wanderer
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for The Wanderer     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Diana, I know Im new to posting here but you have given me a lifetime of knowledge regarding QBID along with many other stocks. I just want to say I believe in you however I certainly dont put any future collapses of any company that I purchased on your shoulders. I purchased them at my own free will and I and only I will take the blame if I didnt take the profits when I could have. My portfolio is up over 10000% and alot of that is from information I obtained from you and researched on my own. So, in ending I would like to again say thank you Daina for all your wisdom and the countless effort that you have put into this and other communications to help us all better our financial lives. Im still looking forward to that big party in Las Vegas when we make to the Millionaire's club.
Posts: 13 | From: Quartz Hill, Calif | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Dakota
Member


Member Rated:
5
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Dakota     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Hey Allstocks.....my vote is show the ISP address....what could it hurt, unless you're guilty of multiple personalities........like I always say...."Just because I'm paranoid don't mean there ain't someone behind me".......

Dakota told you that......


Posts: 172 | From: Kodak, TN, USA | Registered: Feb 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
brandwilliams
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for brandwilliams     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Its amazing how some can't see the road from all the snow being thrown at them. I cleared my windshield about 3 weeks ago, and could see clearly then. I hope all you do the same.

Brandon


Posts: 390 | From: friendship, tn USA | Registered: Feb 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
CouchP
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for CouchP     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
IP Addresses are sensative information, If I had your IP address I could direct all manner of attacks at you in order to stop your internet connection or to harm your computer. I would consider my IP address shown in public as a breach of security at best and a breach of my privacy at worst. I am not a multi poster and adhore those who do, I say we just need to trust the moderators and that they are doing their best to police the boards as they have promised.

Thank you.


Couch


Posts: 300 | From: Albuquerque, NM, USA | Registered: Apr 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
DragonMaster
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for DragonMaster     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
For what it is worth, I also vote to show the IP addresses, If you run a firewall or multiple firewalls as you should to begin with, then it would not be a security issue or breach of privacy. Besides in regards to privacy your email and ip address are gathered everyday by bots on the web, bots by the way who are set upon a task for who knows who or what use that info is used for.

Please Let the IP Addresses be shown.!!!!

The DragonMaster

Mike

------------------
Do Not Meddle In The Affairs Of Dragons, For You Are Crunchy And Taste Good With Ketchup.


Posts: 462 | Registered: Mar 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Smctbone
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Smctbone     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I dont know about showing everyone's IP addresses. Some people say that me, Stoned, and Reality have the same IP address as they noticed during that brief time that they were visible to us. If that is the case, then most of us can't interpret the presence of identical IPs...even I don't understand why our IPs were the same, as those people say they were. I trust AllStocks to sort out the matter, not sure if I would trust the public...but I guess we could eventually settle the problem either way. I've talked to a few of you in chats, they can vouch for me. I can vouch for me...lol

GLTA


Posts: 372 | From: Belleview, FL, USA | Registered: Apr 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Dakota's Missus
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Dakota's Missus     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Though I've been out of the technical loop for over four years, my recollection of IP addressing prompts the following questions.

1) Is it still true that there are two types of IP addresses...static and dynamic? Static addressing is simply addressing that is unique to the user because it is a hard fixed connection such as a cable or an identifiable signal. Dynamic addressing is also unique to the user with the difference being that static addressing is permanent and dynamic is random and changes often.

2) In the case of static addressing, would it not then be as CouchP states, a matter of security. It would be the same as posting your home address or possibly even worse since many home computers contain the family's financial data etc.

3) Site moderating is no easy task. Every moderator has horror stories and problems that may or may not be containable. A serious hacker...basher...trouble maker will not have a static IP address. So identifying them and policing them is still a virtual nigtmare.

I would appreciate someone with up to date expertise speak to my post. I'm hoping that technology once again has passed me by and that there are new and improved methods of containment.

Based on this knowledge, I must vote against publication of IP addresses...to me it is a security issue as well.


Posts: 213 | Registered: Apr 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Money_Penny
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Money_Penny     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
Originally posted by realityinc21:
I AM INSANE AND NOW RETARDED. I WOULD NOT KNOW WHAT AN IP # WAS.

Hey Diana, I've been lurking here for a while now and I have always enjoyed your posts. I actually bought Qbid stock for my kids some time ago, and while it is down now, I still believe this is a good investment. There have been some suggestions made in this forum that your posts are actually made by two or more people, for whatever reason. I personally do not believe this is true, but after reading the above post where you claim that you don't know what an IP # is, I started thinking because I could have sworn I read a post from you earlier today, which I can't find now, where you actually spoke intelligently about "IP addresses". I know you post a lot of info here and there will naturally be some "anomalies" between them, but all this scepticism has got me worried as I want only the best for my kids, so would you care to explain these two seemingly opposite statements? Also, why do you post ALL CAPS but some posts are lowercase? Thanks, and I'm not trying to get you in trouble, unless you are not who you say you are .


Posts: 430 | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
StonedPigeon
Member


Member Rated:
5
Icon 6 posted      Profile for StonedPigeon     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Bone what isp do you use?
Posts: 514 | From: Claremore, Ok., USA | Registered: Apr 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Smctbone
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Smctbone     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
Originally posted by StonedPigeon:
Bone what isp do you use?

Unfortunately I'm stuck with AOL


Posts: 372 | From: Belleview, FL, USA | Registered: Apr 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
StonedPigeon
Member


Member Rated:
5
Icon 1 posted      Profile for StonedPigeon     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
Originally posted by Smctbone:
Unfortunately I'm stuck with AOL

--------------------------------------------

well there ya go then

I'm aol
your aol
diana aol

seems to me people that live in the same
town have the same area code


Posts: 514 | From: Claremore, Ok., USA | Registered: Apr 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
sharkus
Member


Rate Member
Icon 4 posted      Profile for sharkus     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
Originally posted by brandwilliams:
Its amazing how some can't see the road from all the snow being thrown at them. I cleared my windshield about 3 weeks ago, and could see clearly then. I hope all you do the same.

Brandon


I seem to be stuck in the snow - car wont start...will wait just a little while longer till I get out of the car and start to walk.


I just hope I am not laying there frozen on the side of the road....


Posts: 305 | From: Any Airport, Air Line Lounge or Time Zone | Registered: Apr 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Smctbone
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Smctbone     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
Originally posted by StonedPigeon:

that works for me


Posts: 372 | From: Belleview, FL, USA | Registered: Apr 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Smctbone
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Smctbone     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
Originally posted by sharkus:
I seem to be stuck in the snow - car wont start...will wait just a little while longer till I get out of the car and start to walk.
I just hope I am not laying there frozen on the side of the road....

LOL...i'll probably be right there with you.


Posts: 372 | From: Belleview, FL, USA | Registered: Apr 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
krecik
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for krecik     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
What is an IP address?


Every computer connected to the Internet is assigned a unique number known as an Internet Protocol (IP) address.

IP addresses consist of four numbers separated by periods (also called a "dotted-quad") and look something like 127.0.0.1.

Since these numbers are usually assigned to internet service providers within country-based blocks, an IP address can often be used to identify the country from which a computer is connecting to the Internet.

Because the numbers may be tedious to deal with, an IP address may also be assigned to a Host name, which is sometimes easier to remember. Hostnames may be looked up to find IP addresses, and visa-versa.

At one time ISPs issued one IP address to each user. These are called static IP addresses. Because there is a limited number of IP addresses and with increased usage of the internet ISPs now issue IP addresses in a dynamic fashion out of a pool of IP addresses (Using DHCP). These are referred to as dynamic IP addresses. This also limits the ability of the user to host websites, mail servers, ftp servers, and DNS servers.

In addition to users connecting to the internet, with virtual hosting, a single machine can act like multiple machines (with multiple domain names and IP addresses).


Posts: 113 | From: Springfield , Ma. | Registered: Mar 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
StonedPigeon
Member


Member Rated:
5
Icon 6 posted      Profile for StonedPigeon     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I know I don't read every post but did I
miss some sorta big weather change thing!

Posts: 514 | From: Claremore, Ok., USA | Registered: Apr 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
  This topic comprises 67 pages: 1  2  3  ...  60  61  62  63  64  65  66  67   

Post New Topic  New Poll  
Topic Closed  Topic Closed
Open Topic   Feature Topic   Move Topic   Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:


Contact Us | Allstocks.com Message Board Home

© 1997 - 2021 Allstocks.com. All rights reserved.

Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classic™ 6.7.2

Share