posted
Yes! We're oversold & yet people are still throwing in the towel. I'm sitting in the red with this & wondering if they're going to give anyone a reason to buy. I want to average down but we need a bottom & I'm hoping this is it.
posted
What ever happened to Bullrun 2004? I was expecting to hear about it on the news, have an MTV special, see YAHOO! headlines, etc... Seems the only media coverage consisted of some pics on a few websites over several days. Is there something still to come out of it? I'm not sure if I just don't see the obvious value in it for us, or if it was kind of a flop.
Posts: 30 | From: Texas | Registered: May 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
We were all eagerly anticipating a Bullrun PR which never came, Warning apparently dropped the ball on that one. Why? Who knows, but now I guess all eyes will be on the next 10Q which will be a financial tell-all of all that has happened with Warning since it popped up on everyone's radar starting with the Paris news and continuing with Dennis Rodman and also the Malia Jones clothing line. This 10Q sure had better be better then that last one which was horrific. A solid and promising 10Q will reassure most Longs and will attract new investors who have wisely held off for the 10Q. With another disappointing 10Q, well, I'm trying not to think about that.
[This message has been edited by NoMore925 (edited July 05, 2004).]
Posts: 129 | From: Ft Lauderdale, FL, USA | Registered: Mar 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
Not much coversation out there on this one. I was in it for a while and took a huge loss however going back through recent PR's I think it's time to get back in before the next 10Q. Here's what I believe is a very reasonable estimate for the next 10Q.
250k for the Photography division that didn't start until March 25 and is expected to produce 1MM in it's first year based off the PR.
500k with the addition of Dina Ziegler's portfolio which produced 2MM last year and was not a part of WARNING in Q1.
100K Just a guess at the revenues produced with the addition of Malia,Paris,Rodman, Bullrun.....this is just a wild guess so feel free to provide your own estimate.
400k Business as usual not including any of the above new additions.
1,250M total. Not too shabby considering the current PPS.
posted
Paris was on one of the late night shows last night. Did anyone see it? I am just wondering if she said anything that might benefit the company.
quote:Originally posted by f15crew: Paris was on one of the late night shows last night. Did anyone see it? I am just wondering if she said anything that might benefit the company.
Randy
It was a Letterman rerun, and both times it aired, she didn't mention Warning. Has anyone ever seen a celebrity promote their agent on TV before? It would be nice, though.
Posts: 1872 | From: right here | Registered: Apr 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
We've all seemed to avoid WNMI like it's a plague (maybe it is), but how come, with ALL the negatives surrounding this, it is able for the last several days to stand pretty much pat while so many of the sure-fire winners appear to be tanking all the while. Starting out today a wee bit in the green.
Posts: 36 | From: Raleigh, NC, USA | Registered: Jun 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
WNMI needs some good PR. It does not pump out PR like many of the other active pennies. People aren't investing in it or talking about it because there's no news of the company doing anything. I hope they do come out with a monster pr soon because I'm a bagholder on this one. GL.
Posts: 64 | From: la, ca, los angeles | Registered: May 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
You and I both bagholders. I agree with the no news comment......guess it meets the "no news good news" saying.
quote:Originally posted by theprofit: WNMI needs some good PR. It does not pump out PR like many of the other active pennies. People aren't investing in it or talking about it because there's no news of the company doing anything. I hope they do come out with a monster pr soon because I'm a bagholder on this one. GL.
Posts: 36 | From: Raleigh, NC, USA | Registered: Jun 2004
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Bob Frey: What they need is a good 10k
Next 10Q has got to be an improvement over the last one and depending on how much better it is, the pps will follow accordingly. First comes the hype and then investors want numbers.
Posts: 129 | From: Ft Lauderdale, FL, USA | Registered: Mar 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
I have a question. I don't own this stock but I'm looking into it as it is almost back to the pre Paris levels. My question is, do they just represent her strictly for modeling, nothing for her various acting pursuits? Same question regarding Dennis Rodman who I believe they recently signed. If that's the case, do either of these two even do any modeling?
Posts: 5729 | From: Wisconsin | Registered: Sep 2003
| IP: Logged |
posted
Strictly modeling, yes, and whatever product licensing deals they come up with, like the Malia Jones product line out later this year. Paris does a lot of modeling on runways and print ads, such as being the new Guess jeans girl. You can do some basic DD research at warninginfo .com, a site I put together that has a lot of DD links on Warning.
Posts: 74 | Registered: May 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
WNMI is about to be discussed on IBC Radio after the commercial... http://www.ibcradio.comPosts: 1872 | From: right here | Registered: Apr 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
Does anyone see news on wnmi today? My stock alert says there is news today for the company, but I can't seem to find it. Any help would be much appreciated. THanks.
Posts: 64 | From: la, ca, los angeles | Registered: May 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
Wow, that is a pretty serious charge against WNMi.I hope it does not turn out to be true , but there's no other reason why I could see this stock drop so much in the last few months.
Posts: 64 | From: la, ca, los angeles | Registered: May 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
I'm not an expert, but I'll put my 2 cents worth in.
It has not been designated a class-action at this time (according to the link), but that could be a possibility if enough investors bring suit.
The basis for the suit is the allegation the management at WNMI, over a time period of several months, manipulated the marketplace, to benefit themselves. Then, allegedly, they gave false or misleading statements and reports through press releases and SEC filings.
A brief synopsis of the alleged events and timelines is:
-The former CEO (Michael Rudolph) resigns unexpectedly February 4, 2004.
-Brian Bonar is appointed to the Board of Directors, also February 4, 2004.
-Secret deals commence with different individuals which will artificially inflate the price of shares of WNMI, eventually reaching $.055 per share.
-As this is happening, WNMI in collusion with others are dumping shares onto the market at highly inflated prices.
-During this strategic time of share dumping at high prices, WNMI is releasing one PR after another to keep the price up as long as possible.
-When the 10K and 10Q come out, share price drops and PRs stop.
-Contrary to what was reported, Brian Bonar was being helped by the Berlin stock exchange, in that any naked short selling being done was advantageous to driving down the price of shares.
-At this time, all the people close to WNMI's inner circle are well-off due to the well-planned deceit.
-Upcoming is a stockholders meeting, designed to be the next phase of this plan.
Although I have tried to be thorough, I also wanted to be brief, so this information may not be entirely accurate, but it is based on my interpretation of how I read the suit.
Also, I have not taken a position on whether this suit has merits or not. I have merely repeated the allegations as I understood them.
Do I need any more disclaimers?
Well, if I do, consider them implied.
Bob
[This message has been edited by Bob-on-the-golf-course (edited July 21, 2004).]
Posts: 51 | From: Fairfield, CA, USA | Registered: Mar 2004
| IP: Logged |
The real punch will come if they back up the allegations with evidence.
Bob
PS I must say I was extremely surprised to see the stock rebound off the morning lows. If this goes to trial, and especially if it gets class-action status, it is going to be BIG trouble for WNMI's bottom line for a long time. It could get worse if people start leaving the country.
[This message has been edited by Bob-on-the-golf-course (edited July 21, 2004).]
Posts: 51 | From: Fairfield, CA, USA | Registered: Mar 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
Many companies have pending lawsuits filed against them, so what. The plaintiffs could have sold this stock at any time, it's their fault for not selling sooner. All the things they accuse Warning of are nothing new, no revelations here when talking about otc stocks. There was a lot of money to be made on this stock, sucks to be them I guess for not trading wisely. The incredible rise we saw on the Paris news was 'unnatural' and was purely due to hype. The last Q sucked and now there is the proposal of the A/S increase going before the shareholders. The bright side is that this law suit will fade into the background soon and a new pump will begin rising the pps once again so that more money can be made especially if the upcoming Q is a decent improvement over the last one(which by all accounts it should be).
Posts: 129 | From: Ft Lauderdale, FL, USA | Registered: Mar 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
Oh, one more thing, I lost money on this stock, or at least I will if I sell now, but have nobody to blame but MYSELF!! I hold, flipping occasionally, and make money on other stocks in the meantime. The company, mm's, paid pumpers, et. al are not to blame for any of this and law suits are not the solution. Only the SEC can change the rules of the game so until then, guess we just gotta play the game on the scoundrel's terms and try to stay one step ahead when trading.
Posts: 129 | From: Ft Lauderdale, FL, USA | Registered: Mar 2004
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Bob-on-the-golf-course: I disagree with your feeble attempt to justify any deliberate scheming by WNMI directors, if that has in fact happened.
How dare you take the side of those who are out to defraud the public?
Bob
Um, excuse me, but I never said that I side with the dirtbags behind manipulation!! The point I'd like to make is that we all know about the 'pump and dump' schemes which is what the fabric of the otc is made of. So what, do we cheer for the plaintiffs? If these two bought at .005 and sold at .05 therby making thousands instead of losing, would they still be suing, on the behalf of all the bagholders who didn't sell? Answer: NOT!! Make money = who cares about underhanded pump/dump schemes. Lose money = SUE!!!!! Gimme a break.
Posts: 129 | From: Ft Lauderdale, FL, USA | Registered: Mar 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
The position you take seems to suggest that you don't want someone to sue if they were trying to make a legitimate profit, yet got taken to the cleaners by someone who had more extensive knowledge, had greater resources, and had accomplices allowing them to defraud the public at large.
Do I understand your position correctly?
Bob
[This message has been edited by Bob-on-the-golf-course (edited July 21, 2004).]
Posts: 51 | From: Fairfield, CA, USA | Registered: Mar 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
Bob, many made money on WNMI, right? Ok, many also lost, right? Why is that? Because the ones who made money bought at the bottom of the pump and sold closer to the top. Once the pump is over, it all comes toppling down. It leveled off between .01 and .02 and as I stated in a previous post, I bought in around that area, especially after Warning was featured on tv's Faking It. I thought for sure this had upward potential from there which was my mistake. This thing rose out of dirt overnight all the way to .05 with no numbers to back it up yet, just on pure speculation. Of course it could not maintain even the level I bought in at, and I should have known that and waited. Am I a bagholder? Yes, of course. I realize that. But not because of anything the company has done. My timing was awful is all. I learn for next and become a BETTER trader, not a BITTER trader! Is the company in on the manipulation in conjunction with the pumping and financing? Yes. But if I want to avoid all of that, I'd be trading Microsoft and GE instead of WNMI, TSBB and ACSH and all the other otc's and pinks which I've lost AND made money on. I will tell you this though, if the PR's themselves that Warning released were not accurate, that is definitely another matter. For example, if in fact Paris Hilton was never really exclusively represented by them in the first place, I'd say we need to take action as shareholders. But if all the PR's are true and accurate and happed to be purposely released and timed in a way that is typical of a pump and dump sheme with the company behind the wheel the entire time, then no, no lawsuit needed there just better trading technique.
Posts: 129 | From: Ft Lauderdale, FL, USA | Registered: Mar 2004
| IP: Logged |
UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!
Printer-friendly view of this topic
