Allstocks.com's Bulletin Board Post New Topic  New Poll  Post A Reply
my profile login | register | search | faq | forum home

  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Allstocks.com's Bulletin Board » Hot Stocks Free for All ! » NDOL : 300% revenue increase, calling *0.47 (Page 38)

 - UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!   This topic comprises 95 pages: 1  2  3  ...  35  36  37  38  39  40  41  ...  93  94  95   
Author Topic: NDOL : 300% revenue increase, calling *0.47
Purl Gurl
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Purl Gurl         Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
I am a bad girl! Want to see my nekkid pictures?

You boys have not found all of my nekkid pictures,
not just yet.

Purl Gurl

Posts: 7504 | Registered: Dec 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
P Rowds
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for P Rowds     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by glassman:
PG if you uspet these boys again? you are gonna have to write on the board 50 times...

i am a bad bad gurl... [Wink]

or give proof of dilution and share dumping? hmmmm, all i ask... or is that an assumption?

--------------------
NDOL(well before the crash)FPPL BLDV CSHD WWEN?

Posts: 600 | From: CO, WI, contracting in Iraq... | Registered: May 2006  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
glassman
Member


Icon 1 posted      Profile for glassman     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by P Rowds:
quote:
Originally posted by glassman:
PG if you uspet these boys again? you are gonna have to write on the board 50 times...

i am a bad bad gurl... [Wink]

or give proof of dilution and share dumping? hmmmm, all i ask... or is that an assumption?
the price is all you need....

--------------------
Don't envy the happiness of those who live in a fool's paradise.

Posts: 36378 | From: USA | Registered: Sep 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
T e x
Member


Icon 1 posted      Profile for T e x     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Purl Gurl:
"...I dont think blue is being racist...."

Westcott, not Blue.

Be careful. Blue is the most respected
participant here at Allstocks.

Blue is an intelligent gentleman, a very
kind and trustworthy man, the type of man
every sensible woman wants to marry.

I have asked him, privately, to marry me
several times. Odd, he always turns and
runs while screaming.

Must be my wild hair.

Purl Gurl

appreciate that, saves me time later...

not debating superlatives, but don't forget Ric...another great, helpful trader

--------------------
Nashoba Holba Chepulechi
Adventures in microcapitalism...

Posts: 21062 | From: Fort Worth | Registered: Apr 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Purl Gurl
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Purl Gurl         Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
What I see happening is a contrast between
being a father and being a mother. I assume
most of you boys are fathers. Clearly I am
a real mother! (with other words attached)

Men are suppose to be tough, to be made of
steel, to be aggressive and protective.

We women, well, we are just back stabbing b!tches.

I see families, I see children, I see homes,
I see loved ones being victimized by criminals.
This bothers me, deeply.

Ok, boys say, "Well, that is just the way it
goes. You should know better than to trade
stocks. This is your fault. Suck it up."

I challenge those criminals to say that
to children being victimized. I would not
be surprised if some suggest, "Screw the
children. Who cares."

As a woman, as a mother, as a teacher, as a
Choctaw Indian, my compassion for others is
extreme, too much so. I keep thinking of
children whose families lose money to these
criminals in the stock markets. I keep seeing
children being shorted, having to do without,
missing out on a special present, not receiving
new shoes, maybe eating less, because some
criminal defrauded the parents.

I see those children and become upset.

I am sure these pump and dump criminals only
see themselves, the most important of all people,
in their perspective.

I see families, I see children, I see criminals
preying upon those families and children.

Enron, you only need to think of Enron to realize
this extreme harm criminals cause to families.

And you, the reader, odds are you are one
of those criminals.

Purl Gurl

Posts: 7504 | Registered: Dec 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
BooDog
Member


Icon 1 posted      Profile for BooDog     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
ruskin - In just the last few days I have gone through all of the 05 - 06 threads BTSI to NDOL every PR there is just about, even trailing previous CEO's - very interesting there (CNX). It's their job to promote north-west. I lost half my post going back to find this http://www.monimpex.com/about_us_en.html. I did see how people could fall for the Hype, and with out patience for a good DD you may loose out on the run. But then you may loose everything if you don't. My guess is this will run again, and IMO it will fall back, way back. They have the ABC how to do it yourself book and they are following the steps.

--------------------
All post are my opinion. Do your own DD. Who's clicking your buy/sell button!?

Posts: 7800 | From: Virginia | Registered: May 2006  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Egg Inspector
Member


Icon 1 posted      Profile for Egg Inspector     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by glassman:
that's not what everybody pumping this stock is saying ruskin....

you won't sell a stock like that...

dontcha get it? that's what pumpanddump is all about..
you are just proving PG's point....
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

everybody is saying the same thing glass. see through the words.

NORD was trading at 0.07 when I first got into it. I got into it after it released its PR talking about its revenues of 10M followed by frankfurt listing, which is perfectly appropriate for a company with around 500 employees to achieve. i shall post the first PR part which got me into the stock.

"The company's revenue was generally derived from its oil storage, oil transport and spot oil trading activities. The company expects these activities to account for only 20% of its revenue once it begins the oil and gas production on its properties under license."


informative ruskin....

Posts: 1307 | From: Pittsburgh, PA | Registered: Jun 2006  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
ruskin_muskin
Member


Icon 1 posted      Profile for ruskin_muskin         Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by glassman:
what is not appreciated is nagging hatred for a stock, and that is what is the issue here.

but i know the game here in the pinksheets Ruskin....

why does everybody keep ignoring the PRE14....

i showed up here after the insults were already in full swing...

i have no doubt that PG upset people with her posts...

are you gonna sit there and tell me Purl Gurl started it?

LOL... wah wah wah

nobodys ignoring the PRE glass.. here are the sales which might have affected us.

Filer
Select a filer below for more information. Relation File Date Shares Broker
BOBOWSKY, ANDREI 05/26/2006
500,000
UNKNOWN
JACQUE LINE ROSSEL 05/05/2006
416,667
CANACCORD CAPITAL CO...
RENDA, DOMENICA 04/27/2006
1,800,000
N B C N CLEARING
MIDLAND BARING ASSET... 04/25/2006
3,378,654
UNKNOWN
GALLO, MICHELINE 04/24/2006
700,000
N B C N CLEARING
DIBARI, ANDY 03/13/2006
232,917
CANACCORD CAPITAL CO...
FRASER, TODD 03/13/2006
179,095
CANACCORD CAPITAL CO...
GALLO, ANTHONY 02/28/2006
721,414
N B C N CLEARING
GALLO, MORENO 02/28/2006
535,000
N B C N CLEARING
IACONO, CLAUDIA 02/28/2006
921,414
N B C N CLEARING

prior to April 27th, the stock was not even considerably trading. I am not sure of precise price, but the price was around 0.4 range. thats when there was a big chunk, say like 1M shares. these shares were even before merger information was announced. the time when this sale was registered, there was no information on merger/acquisition. there was just a mention of unsolicited offer, but other than that there was nothing more. so if these guys dumped 1M shares on that day and didnt wait for price to raise to its full level, which was 1.35, they were stupid. only other two insider sales were some rossel and some bobowsky. their total share count was less than a million. if that is significant dilution, then i guess you are either new to pinks or too naive to beleive thats how dilution in pinks works. take a look at charts as to how share price slides on dilution. take a look at CRDM chart, or VRDM chart. thats what is called dilution's impact. not less than a million shares sold by may be some shareholders. one of them sold before their shares became restricted. may5th was when one chunk came in and the price then was around 0.55-0.6. another was recent, and this might have been someone who got kicked out of company.

the only other chunk was midland barings, and i am sure, that sale wouldnt have benefeted a single ounce to NORD.

--------------------
All my posts are based on my own opinions and not to be taken as buy/sell recommendations.

Posts: 961 | Registered: May 2006  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
glassman
Member


Icon 1 posted      Profile for glassman     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
pretty good work boodog

from the Monimpex web site...

2. Reverse merger with an already existing public company (Shell)



This method consists of acquiring an already existing Public Shell Company. It permits private company shareholders to buy a publicly listed company, or shell, that has no substantial business activity. In a Reverse Merger, the shareholders of the private company purchase control of the public shell company. The next step is to merge the public shell company with their private company. Consequently, the shareholders of the private company receive all or most of the shares of the public company and nominate and control its board of directors.
Our future partners should keep in mind the following:

The technology of merger and acquisition is by itself well known to the owners and leading managers in countries with developing economies, but in this case the object of a merger is a public shell company. By acquiring such a company you are purchasing an instrument on which qualities will depend on the reorganization of your business. It is evident that the better the instrument is the more money it will cost. Normally the price starts at 250 000 $ and more. But no matter how expensive is the public shell company that you acquired, before the reverse merger is completed your company will be subject to a lengthy (sometime up to a year and a half) verification.

The following table is a price/quality estimate of various shells conducted by our specialist:


as you can see if you read thru their site? they are a company that specialises in bringing co's public...

--------------------
Don't envy the happiness of those who live in a fool's paradise.

Posts: 36378 | From: USA | Registered: Sep 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Purl Gurl
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Purl Gurl         Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Those are not restricted shares and a majority
of the selling, highest volume amount, took
place during the height of the pump and dump.

You should not place yourself in a position
of easy critique. Otherwords, be truthful
with readers rather than pump your personal
agenda for the sake of your masculine ego.

Purl Gurl

Posts: 7504 | Registered: Dec 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
ruskin_muskin
Member


Icon 1 posted      Profile for ruskin_muskin         Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by glassman:
quote:
Originally posted by P Rowds:
quote:
Originally posted by glassman:
PG if you uspet these boys again? you are gonna have to write on the board 50 times...

i am a bad bad gurl... [Wink]

or give proof of dilution and share dumping? hmmmm, all i ask... or is that an assumption?
the price is all you need....
are you kidding me? price is all you need is all you have to say to providing proof of share dumping? so i guess when it was trading at 0.07, there was more share dumping than it is when it is trading at 0.36-0.44 range. lol..

--------------------
All my posts are based on my own opinions and not to be taken as buy/sell recommendations.

Posts: 961 | Registered: May 2006  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
P Rowds
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for P Rowds     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
so purl... how are you gonna help the families gambling away life savings at the casino's of nevada and the indians casino's across the nation?

--------------------
NDOL(well before the crash)FPPL BLDV CSHD WWEN?

Posts: 600 | From: CO, WI, contracting in Iraq... | Registered: May 2006  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
ruskin_muskin
Member


Icon 1 posted      Profile for ruskin_muskin         Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Purl Gurl:
Those are not restricted shares and a majority
of the selling, highest volume amount, took
place during the height of the pump and dump.

You should not place yourself in a position
of easy critique. Otherwords, be truthful
with readers rather than pump your personal
agenda for the sake of your masculine ego.

Purl Gurl

dont be sexist here.. masculine ego.. feminine ego.. how do you even know i am male? did i tell you? i might be a girl, a gay or w/e .. dont comment on unnecessary topics. talk only relevant DD on NDOL and lets get to facts.

--------------------
All my posts are based on my own opinions and not to be taken as buy/sell recommendations.

Posts: 961 | Registered: May 2006  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
glassman
Member


Icon 1 posted      Profile for glassman     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:

prior to April 27th, the stock was not even considerably trading. I am not sure of precise price, but the price was around 0.4 range. thats when there was a big chunk, say like 1M shares. these shares were even before merger information was announced. the time when this sale was registered, there was no information on merger/acquisition. there was just a mention of unsolicited offer, but other than that there was nothing more. so if these guys dumped 1M shares on that day and didnt wait for price to raise to its full level, which was 1.35, they were stupid. only other two insider sales were some rossel and some bobowsky. their total share count was less than a million. if that is significant dilution, then i guess you are either new to pinks or too naive to beleive thats how dilution in pinks works. take a look at charts as to how share price slides on dilution. take a look at CRDM chart, or VRDM chart. thats what is called dilution's impact. not less than a million shares sold by may be some shareholders. one of them sold before their shares became restricted. may5th was when one chunk came in and the price then was around 0.55-0.6. another was recent, and this might have been someone who got kicked out of company.

the only other chunk was midland barings, and i am sure, that sale wouldnt have benefeted a single ounce to NORD.

why are you so sure anybody but the MM's traded this?

the game isn't nearly as simple as you make it out to be...

i have never offered any opinions on this company's insider selling...

so you don't need to address me when you try to support your points..
address the readers they are out there and they are who you need to convince to buy it... not me..

--------------------
Don't envy the happiness of those who live in a fool's paradise.

Posts: 36378 | From: USA | Registered: Sep 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Purl Gurl
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Purl Gurl         Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
I will help gamblers by making a convincing
promise they will always win if they gamble.

That is my intent, to convince American families
gambling will make them rich! They are so gullible
none realize gambling is a gamble and they will
most likely lose!

Sit down and play poker! I promise you will win!
I am quite certain idiot Americans have no clue
when they walk into an Indian casino, which benefits
millions through jobs, income, education, schools,
medical help and such, I am sure Americans are
so stupid they are unaware gambling is a gamble
and they will believe my promise of wins and richs,
about as stupid as you for making such an idiotic
comparison to deliberate stock fraud through deceit.

Purl Gurl

Posts: 7504 | Registered: Dec 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
ruskin_muskin
Member


Icon 1 posted      Profile for ruskin_muskin         Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by glassman:
quote:

prior to April 27th, the stock was not even considerably trading. I am not sure of precise price, but the price was around 0.4 range. thats when there was a big chunk, say like 1M shares. these shares were even before merger information was announced. the time when this sale was registered, there was no information on merger/acquisition. there was just a mention of unsolicited offer, but other than that there was nothing more. so if these guys dumped 1M shares on that day and didnt wait for price to raise to its full level, which was 1.35, they were stupid. only other two insider sales were some rossel and some bobowsky. their total share count was less than a million. if that is significant dilution, then i guess you are either new to pinks or too naive to beleive thats how dilution in pinks works. take a look at charts as to how share price slides on dilution. take a look at CRDM chart, or VRDM chart. thats what is called dilution's impact. not less than a million shares sold by may be some shareholders. one of them sold before their shares became restricted. may5th was when one chunk came in and the price then was around 0.55-0.6. another was recent, and this might have been someone who got kicked out of company.

the only other chunk was midland barings, and i am sure, that sale wouldnt have benefeted a single ounce to NORD.

why are you so sure anybody but the MM's traded this?

the game isn't nearly as simple as you make it out to be...

i have never offered any opinions on this company's insider selling...

so you don't need to address me when you try to support your points..
address the readers they are out there and they are who you need to convince to buy it... not me..

i didnt say MM's were trading it. I said considerably trading as in trading at considerable price. which should be around 0.8-1.32 range IMO.

you mentioned about dilution and PRE.. thats why i addressed it specifically to you. and i sincerely want readers to know what this whole thing is about. if it is just about satisfying ego, then i wouldnt waste that much time in doing this. in this time, i would have decided what company i would put my money into for tomorrow mornign, but just that i feel people should see through convolutions here.

--------------------
All my posts are based on my own opinions and not to be taken as buy/sell recommendations.

Posts: 961 | Registered: May 2006  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
ruskin_muskin
Member


Icon 1 posted      Profile for ruskin_muskin         Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by glassman:
pretty good work boodog

from the Monimpex web site...

2. Reverse merger with an already existing public company (Shell)



This method consists of acquiring an already existing Public Shell Company. It permits private company shareholders to buy a publicly listed company, or shell, that has no substantial business activity. In a Reverse Merger, the shareholders of the private company purchase control of the public shell company. The next step is to merge the public shell company with their private company. Consequently, the shareholders of the private company receive all or most of the shares of the public company and nominate and control its board of directors.
Our future partners should keep in mind the following:

The technology of merger and acquisition is by itself well known to the owners and leading managers in countries with developing economies, but in this case the object of a merger is a public shell company. By acquiring such a company you are purchasing an instrument on which qualities will depend on the reorganization of your business. It is evident that the better the instrument is the more money it will cost. Normally the price starts at 250 000 $ and more. But no matter how expensive is the public shell company that you acquired, before the reverse merger is completed your company will be subject to a lengthy (sometime up to a year and a half) verification.

The following table is a price/quality estimate of various shells conducted by our specialist:


as you can see if you read thru their site? they are a company that specialises in bringing co's public...

lot of companies do this. recently NYSE did this method to become public!!!!

--------------------
All my posts are based on my own opinions and not to be taken as buy/sell recommendations.

Posts: 961 | Registered: May 2006  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
glassman
Member


Icon 1 posted      Profile for glassman     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
you mentioned about dilution and PRE..

yes i did mention the pre14, and you have yet to discuss the PRE14...

do you know what it says? cuz that's why the price is lower than you'd like it to be... no more no less...

it's got nothing to do with me or PG or any othe posters...

--------------------
Don't envy the happiness of those who live in a fool's paradise.

Posts: 36378 | From: USA | Registered: Sep 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
glassman
Member


Icon 1 posted      Profile for glassman     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
also? rusjkin? lots of co's reverse merger, that's true, why do you suspect i was saying anything negative?

awfull defensive here aren't you?

--------------------
Don't envy the happiness of those who live in a fool's paradise.

Posts: 36378 | From: USA | Registered: Sep 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Egg Inspector
Member


Icon 1 posted      Profile for Egg Inspector     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by P Rowds:
amen boo... family's should know what they're getting into. it's a damn pinksheet for god sakes. and i've said it before, if they can't do their DD and make their own decisions and accept losses, try a savings account or a CD. i hear those are great investments... you never lose

great post

psst.....agrees on BLDV

Posts: 1307 | From: Pittsburgh, PA | Registered: Jun 2006  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Purl Gurl
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Purl Gurl         Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Wait! These boys adamantly claim I caused NDOL
stock to crash. They even complained to the SEC
about my manipulating shares prices for no reason.

It is extremely clear, now that the pump is over,
NDOL is being heavily diluted by the company
and possibly by insiders.

Rather than write a book, begging off here, I will
refer readers to research on dilution. There are
many signs of dilution. NDOL displays all those
signs and they have a billion shares to dump.

Research, read and learn. Do not take Glassman's
word. He is stupid. Do not take my word. I am
more stupid than Glassman.

Take the word of pump and dump scam artists.
They never lie!

Read, research and learn. If you cannot spot
this extensive dilution, you have no business
trading stocks.

Purl Gurl

Posts: 7504 | Registered: Dec 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
T e x
Member


Icon 1 posted      Profile for T e x     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
hold on y'all...

I'd like to follow this--munchkin says:

quote:
prior to April 27th, the stock was not even considerably trading. I am not sure of precise price, but the price was around 0.4 range. thats when there was a big chunk, say like 1M shares. these shares were even before merger information was announced. the time when this sale was registered, there was no information on merger/acquisition. there was just a mention of unsolicited offer, but other than that there was nothing more. so if these guys dumped 1M shares on that day and didnt wait for price to raise to its full level, which was 1.35, they were stupid. only other two insider sales were some rossel and some bobowsky. their total share count was less than a million. if that is significant dilution, then i guess you are either new to pinks or too naive to beleive thats how dilution in pinks works. take a look at charts as to how share price slides on dilution. take a look at CRDM chart, or VRDM chart. thats what is called dilution's impact. not less than a million shares sold by may be some shareholders. one of them sold before their shares became restricted. may5th was when one chunk came in and the price then was around 0.55-0.6. another was recent, and this might have been someone who got kicked out of company.

the only other chunk was midland barings, and i am sure, that sale wouldnt have benefeted a single ounce to NORD.

hello? gvrp.... one of them sold ...

sorry, lost track...

--------------------
Nashoba Holba Chepulechi
Adventures in microcapitalism...

Posts: 21062 | From: Fort Worth | Registered: Apr 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Purl Gurl
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Purl Gurl         Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Check me on this, I am not sure.

Did not NDOL state there would be dilution
because of the billion shares in their Pre14?

I think so but am not inclined to look again.

Purl Gurl

Posts: 7504 | Registered: Dec 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
ruskin_muskin
Member


Icon 1 posted      Profile for ruskin_muskin         Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
well, regarding increase in share structure, shares themselves dont really matter until they are put into the market. and who can tell weather these shares would be diluted into the market or into hands of institutions or private investors, and if i were a private investor and would see the potential of NWOG, i wouldnt want to dump my shares into the market at 0.3 range.

--------------------
All my posts are based on my own opinions and not to be taken as buy/sell recommendations.

Posts: 961 | Registered: May 2006  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
glassman
Member


Icon 1 posted      Profile for glassman     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
yes, but the company would increase book value by doing this...
the problem is that in pink sheets? book value is hard to get...

so when thye go to the otcbb? you'll get closer to book value..
and then when they go NASD? you'll be even better off.

i've actually idden a few stocks that far, and it's abumpy ride...

--------------------
Don't envy the happiness of those who live in a fool's paradise.

Posts: 36378 | From: USA | Registered: Sep 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
HorseRider
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for HorseRider     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
rushkin muskin and Boo dog , thanks for posting information relevant to NDOL, too bad one needs to read so much crap to get to it.

And what a sad bunch that has to post to get their laughs or prove how superior they are to others.And oh so sensitive, waaaa someone made a remark and hurt my feelings,, sheesh. And if you sensitive people are so intellectual you will build a good rebuttal not just take the easiest way out,,, by proclaiming racism.

If you have nothing worthwhile ( positive or negative)to the subject of the stocks to say just keep your fingers off the keyboard.

Sorry just irritated by all the garbage. Please keep it on the subject of the stocks.

Oh Purl where are those neked pics,at least want to get some chuckles from all this haha

--------------------
Pull on your boots,Slap on your hat, Relax, and Enjoy the ride.

Posts: 31 | From: Wills Point, Texas | Registered: Apr 2006  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
glassman
Member


Icon 1 posted      Profile for glassman     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by ruskin_muskin:
well, regarding increase in share structure, shares themselves dont really matter until they are put into the market. and who can tell weather these shares would be diluted into the market or into hands of institutions or private investors, and if i were a private investor and would see the potential of NWOG, i wouldnt want to dump my shares into the market at 0.3 range.

tell that to the MM's... [Roll Eyes]

this is what i've been telling you all along...
and so did Parkins in that email to Wescott...

he did accuse somebody of working for the MM's but his scenario is not likely... and the MMs can work it up and down in price not just down...
the MM's can wait for months for the run to die out and buy back in if they need to or want to. it's done every day

--------------------
Don't envy the happiness of those who live in a fool's paradise.

Posts: 36378 | From: USA | Registered: Sep 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Purl Gurl
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Purl Gurl         Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Tex, stirring up hornets, adds,

"hello? gvrp.... one of them sold ..."

Ha! Ha! I wish all readers were in the know
on what happened with Gluv!

So funny! Mother of all short squeezes!

All I got was a darn ink pen with a GLUV
logo written on it.

Purl Gurl

Posts: 7504 | Registered: Dec 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Purl Gurl
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Purl Gurl         Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Horse Rider! Ha! Ha! That ain't no horse you
are riding, that is a damn mule and you
mounted backwards!

Purl Gurl

* gotta watch those darn gerunds. Have to
edit my posts to not give away English
is not my native tongue.

Posts: 7504 | Registered: Dec 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
glassman
Member


Icon 1 posted      Profile for glassman     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
it's interesting how many posters come in with 10 or 20 posts on their resume and make these funny statements....

And if you sensitive people are so intellectual you will build a good rebuttal not just take the easiest way out,,, by proclaiming racism.
if you had any intellectual curiosity? you'd check out if/why his remarks were racist...

--------------------
Don't envy the happiness of those who live in a fool's paradise.

Posts: 36378 | From: USA | Registered: Sep 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
ruskin_muskin
Member


Icon 1 posted      Profile for ruskin_muskin         Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by glassman:
also? rusjkin? lots of co's reverse merger, that's true, why do you suspect i was saying anything negative?

awfull defensive here aren't you?

no nothing defensive. you know what, i only have $500 into this stock now. i sold it way back and took a small position * 0.305 into this stock recently. i am not even promoting this stock. i dont need to. and even if i promote, the amount of gains i would get wont even be significant as to what i make ut of 5K i put into market daily for about 2-3% a day. so dont think i am being defensive or anything.

reverse merger is nothing negative, if the O/S and other things are also reduced..lol.. and as for reverse merger, i dont see a reason why NDOL needs reverse merger. if they are going to AMEX and are doing R/S, i would take a significant position into this stock for longterm.

i dont know but suddenly, when there is an overwhelming amount of people just calling this thing pure P&D, and it being one of the few pinks which i rode all along, flipping like crazy and making significant gains, i just wanted to question people who keep repeatedly saying P&D. if you dont beleive it is P&D, then thats good. i would always accept constructive arguments based on facts, but purely on speculation, if people are making unfounded comments, thats what makes me feel uncomfortable.

--------------------
All my posts are based on my own opinions and not to be taken as buy/sell recommendations.

Posts: 961 | Registered: May 2006  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
DOUBLE L
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for DOUBLE L     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
The best part is in a few weeks or months everybody will know. Come back in Dec. and the writing will be on the walls. One question why do they need a billion shares? Thats all it takes for me to hit the door running. 1 good reason.

--------------------
Amazing how much time we spend looking for the truth but never spend the time to get to the point.

Posts: 1164 | From: KANSAS CITY | Registered: Aug 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
T e x
Member


Icon 1 posted      Profile for T e x     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by P Rowds:
so purl... how are you gonna help the families gambling away life savings at the casino's of nevada and the indians casino's across the nation?

PRowds, how you gonna help children of crack addicts? We're traders...

--------------------
Nashoba Holba Chepulechi
Adventures in microcapitalism...

Posts: 21062 | From: Fort Worth | Registered: Apr 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Purl Gurl
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Purl Gurl         Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
"...when there is an overwhelming amount of people
just calling this thing pure P&D...."

There is a good reason for this. A vast majority,
the silent majority, recognize NDOL as a pump and
dump scheme.

Nonetheless, the pumpers and die hard groupies
continue to viciously argue NDOL is not a P & D.

Their voices are the loudest and the most ignored.

Purl Gurl

Posts: 7504 | Registered: Dec 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
glassman
Member


Icon 1 posted      Profile for glassman     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
reverse merger is nothing negative, if the O/S and other things are also reduced..lol.. and as for reverse merger, i dont see a reason why NDOL needs reverse merger. if they are going to AMEX and are doing R/S, i would take a significant position into this stock for longterm.

OK, a reverse merger is when a company takes over another co in astock swap...

i think you are talking about a Reverse split....

they already did a reverse merger...
the "interesting part"? is who the people are that are working for Monipex... Parkin is one of them...

--------------------
Don't envy the happiness of those who live in a fool's paradise.

Posts: 36378 | From: USA | Registered: Sep 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
  This topic comprises 95 pages: 1  2  3  ...  35  36  37  38  39  40  41  ...  93  94  95   

Quick Reply
Message:

HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.

Instant Graemlins
   


Post New Topic  New Poll  Post A Reply Close Topic   Feature Topic   Move Topic   Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:


Contact Us | Allstocks.com Message Board Home

© 1997 - 2021 Allstocks.com. All rights reserved.

Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classic™ 6.7.2

Share