quote:Originally posted by IWISHIHAD: Originally Posted By Glassman:
neither one is a good choice. BTW? hillary will will have to attack somebody to prove she's got balls. so either way relentless could be right about seeing WW4 in it's embryonic stage.
Ok, i stand corrected. I meant it sarcastically. The thing is that it's the men that insist on a demonstration of willingness to exersize power. If she doesn't do it, they'll try to push her around until she does. The longer she puts off a a flexing of muscle, the more muscle she'll have to flex when she is finally forced to. I don't like it, but you can't ignore it either. The Waco incident was not started by U.S. Attorney General Janet Reno, but it's ending was most defintitely not a good one for anybody becuase she had to prove that a woman can be a tough leader. It isn't Women's fault that they have to do the dance backward and in high-heel shoes just to prove they are equals.
Obama had to run the opposite tack becuse of the angry/dangerous African Americna Male stereotype. he could never allow himself to appear to be aggressive in any way, or they would have pounced all over him. That approach left him open to being accused of weaknesss. He handled it very well.
I personally respect both Hillary and Bill's intellect, but i thnk both of them are power-hungry megalomaniacs who will do whatever they think is best for therest of us whether we like it or not. And that's not Democratic, that's fanaticism.
-------------------- Don't envy the happiness of those who live in a fool's paradise. Posts: 36378 | From: USA | Registered: Sep 2003
| IP: Logged |
posted
War with Russia has to do with shear numbers on the Russian side and the willingness of her soldiers to die like flies to achieve victory. We can win battles take land witch we will. But that don't beat mother Russia. Ask the Germans and before them the French.They won the battles but lost the war.
-------------------- Wise men learn more from fools than fools from the wise. Posts: 3827 | From: beautiful California | Registered: Sep 2008
| IP: Logged |
Tensions between the United States and Russia may be on the brink of chaos.
As a result of negotiations between Vice President Joe Biden and Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko, the White House will be deploying 290 U.S. paratroopers into the volatile Ukraine region next month.
This is in retaliation to Russia's recent tactics, which include conducting live fire drills on tdohe Russian/Ukraine border, as well as breaching the no-fly zone that has been enacted.
And unfortunately, we may be inching closer to a "worst case scenario."
-------------------- Wise men learn more from fools than fools from the wise. Posts: 3827 | From: beautiful California | Registered: Sep 2008
| IP: Logged |
Russian Analyst Calls For Nuclear Attack on Yellowstone National Park "The consequences will be catastrophic for the United States" Russian Analyst Calls For Nuclear Attack on Yellowstone National Park
by Paul Joseph Watson | March 31, 2015
Russian geopolitical analyst Konstantin Sivkov has called for Moscow to launch a nuclear attack on Yellowstone National Park and the San Andreas fault line, noting that the devastating consequences would ‘disappear’ the United States as a country.
Sivkov made the comments in a piece for Russian trade newspaper VPK News, which were translated by the Sydney Morning Herald.
Arguing that NATO aggression against Russia required the “complete destruction of the enemy,” Sivkov went on to depict a chilling scenario.
quote:Originally posted by raybond: U.S. to Deploy Paratroopers to Ukraine
By MONEY MORNING STAFF REPORTS - 3/31/2015
This is a quickly developing story.
Tensions between the United States and Russia may be on the brink of chaos.
As a result of negotiations between Vice President Joe Biden and Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko, the White House will be deploying 290 U.S. paratroopers into the volatile Ukraine region next month.
This is in retaliation to Russia's recent tactics, which include conducting live fire drills on tdohe Russian/Ukraine border, as well as breaching the no-fly zone that has been enacted.
And unfortunately, we may be inching closer to a "worst case scenario."
So a discussion between the two dumbest morons on all the world stage has resulted in a sure fire way to get Russia even more upset?
Mind you I'm including the colossally stupid Kardashions in my description of the "world stage"... just for reference.
As I stated previously: Our government is directly involved in provoking a direct war with Russia... on their soil.
Posts: 2965 | Registered: Aug 2005
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by glassman: and then there's this nutjob:
Russian Analyst Calls For Nuclear Attack on Yellowstone National Park "The consequences will be catastrophic for the United States" Russian Analyst Calls For Nuclear Attack on Yellowstone National Park
by Paul Joseph Watson | March 31, 2015
Russian geopolitical analyst Konstantin Sivkov has called for Moscow to launch a nuclear attack on Yellowstone National Park and the San Andreas fault line, noting that the devastating consequences would ‘disappear’ the United States as a country.
Sivkov made the comments in a piece for Russian trade newspaper VPK News, which were translated by the Sydney Morning Herald.
Arguing that NATO aggression against Russia required the “complete destruction of the enemy,” Sivkov went on to depict a chilling scenario.
Saw that.. Holy crap stupid. This guy should be doing interviews on E!, level stupid.
Yes lets nuke a long since dormant volcano in the hopes it erupts.. The moron spends far too much time reading the witless comments of fear mongering conspiracy idiots than he does researching the facts which prove yellowstone will never erupt again... Bombed or not.
Also bombing a fault line will do nothing as the percussion wave will A- never reach the depths required to unsettle said fault line, but B- Never be powerful enough to cause a slip between the two opposing plates.
Just goes to show that we and the Ruskies have more in common than we think.
Posts: 2965 | Registered: Aug 2005
| IP: Logged |
UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!
Printer-friendly view of this topic
