This could be said about a lot of families in politics. The Kennedys are far worse! The Clintons? And you know as well as everyone else here that the Bush's are not going away. Obama may turn out to be a good president in the media but he is not going to stop this whole "new world order." He will probably further it through NAFTA. He will further it through the UN. He has to or he will not make another term. Neither the dems or pubs, both of which support Bush, Reagan, and Clinton's NWO will allow it. The ultimate goal of our government (this came from Bush I's very own mouth) is to have the UN as a world government (you know it will be run by a small group of very wealthy people from only a handful of nations). A world economy? What happened when US banks failed? Clinton furthered Bush I's plan. Bush II furthered this plan. The UN, US, China, Great Britain, and Russia already "police" the world now.
-------------------- "When you're in a hole, the first thing you do is stop digging." -H. Ross Perot
IP: Logged |
posted
In spite of the exuberance of conspiracy theories, there is no actual evidence of any real effort to form any sort of an all controlling government, of this country or the world. (Dubya may have had such dreams, but he failed. No one with sense attributes sense or intellegence to whatever dubya dreams.)
If either a world government or absolute control of the U.S. were were even feasible, such conspiracy theories belong in the same bucket with little green men from Mars and polite conversation, with Sasquatch, about formal evening dress while attending an afternoon tea party in Boston.
IP: Logged |
quote:In spite of the exuberance of conspiracy theories, there is no actual evidence of any real effort to form any sort of an all controlling government, of this country or the world. (Dubya may have had such dreams, but he failed. No one with sense attributes sense or intellegence to whatever dubya dreams.)
If either a world government or absolute control of the U.S. were were even feasible, such conspiracy theories belong in the same bucket with little green men from Mars and polite conversation, with Sasquatch, about formal evening dress while attending an afternoon tea party in Boston.
Here are some interesting videos. My favorite is Bush I's little speech. We all know Bush II's quest to continue for daddy.
"...and it's a phrase I often used myself, that we needed a new world order."
quote:Originally posted by bdgee: In spite of the exuberance of conspiracy theories, there is no actual evidence of any real effort to form any sort of an all controlling government, of this country or the world. (Dubya may have had such dreams, but he failed. No one with sense attributes sense or intellegence to whatever dubya dreams.)
If either a world government or absolute control of the U.S. were were even feasible, such conspiracy theories belong in the same bucket with little green men from Mars and polite conversation, with Sasquatch, about formal evening dress while attending an afternoon tea party in Boston.
actually bdgee? they don't want a world Government so much as they want the ability to manipulate the world's govts.
another World Govt might get out of their control...
-------------------- Don't envy the happiness of those who live in a fool's paradise.
IP: Logged |
posted
That makes some sort of skewed sense, glass..., particularly of you list under the title "they" such names GM, Microsoft, IG Farben, Carlyle Group, etc.
IP: Logged |