posted
Well a bit of what I hope is pretty positive news. They have updated their website some more. Under the EM-100 Tab...
"EM-100 is a technical approach to control different physical chemical processes. EM-100 uses the aid of electromagnetic waves on the media and is based on fundamental scientific ideas incorporating physics, chemistry, biology and information theory.
EM-100 utilizes physical chemical processes's, within the hydrocarbon liquid(oil, petroleum products, etc). The method allows the organic interconnections of the hydrocarbon liquid to be destroy, chemically modify and enter into controlled reactions.
New direction in refining of heavy petroleum and petroleum by-products use a wide arsenal of physical methods such as Cathode-Ray, ultrasonic and lasers. There are optimum parameters determined for processing of heavy petroleum fractions with a boiling point of more then 400. Beams of high-energy electrons, Make it possible to obtain output of 20% of gasoline and 60% of diesel fractions. It has also been determined that the radiation treatment serves as an effective desulphurization of motor fuels. EM-100 uses higher frequency then microwave, by utilizing electromagnetic vibrations in the infrared region. More specifically in the region of visual-light and ultraviolet region. This allows for actions on the chemical reactions coherent by laser emission to be more accurately controlled, based on fundamental scientific mechanisms of the resonance interactions in the substance and of the electromagnetic vibrations."
It's good to know that they seem to be working on resolving the problem, rather then fleeing the country. Just wish they would start retunring people's emails...would make me feel alot better. But hey...Baby steps and patience
Posts: 596 | From: New Jersey | Registered: Apr 2006
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by JerZeyDeViL: Well a bit of what I hope is pretty positive news. They have updated their website some more. Under the EM-100 Tab...
"EM-100 is a technical approach to control different physical chemical processes. EM-100 uses the aid of electromagnetic waves on the media and is based on fundamental scientific ideas incorporating physics, chemistry, biology and information theory.
EM-100 utilizes physical chemical processes's, within the hydrocarbon liquid(oil, petroleum products, etc). The method allows the organic interconnections of the hydrocarbon liquid to be destroy, chemically modify and enter into controlled reactions.
New direction in refining of heavy petroleum and petroleum by-products use a wide arsenal of physical methods such as Cathode-Ray, ultrasonic and lasers. There are optimum parameters determined for processing of heavy petroleum fractions with a boiling point of more then 400. Beams of high-energy electrons, Make it possible to obtain output of 20% of gasoline and 60% of diesel fractions. It has also been determined that the radiation treatment serves as an effective desulphurization of motor fuels. EM-100 uses higher frequency then microwave, by utilizing electromagnetic vibrations in the infrared region. More specifically in the region of visual-light and ultraviolet region. This allows for actions on the chemical reactions coherent by laser emission to be more accurately controlled, based on fundamental scientific mechanisms of the resonance interactions in the substance and of the electromagnetic vibrations."
It's good to know that they seem to be working on resolving the problem, rather then fleeing the country. Just wish they would start retunring people's emails...would make me feel alot better. But hey...Baby steps and patience
Great job JerZeyDeViL,
Wow, what a mouthful in that process description. Almost need a lawyer to decipher it, but sounds important! Any rocket scientist on this thread who can shed some light? Does this sound possible or is this a lot of smoke?
Posts: 616 | From: Mid West | Registered: Mar 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
You know, on re-reading the above, it seems odd that whoever wrote it, didn't run it through spell check, as it has numerous mistakes. You would think that anyone who can comprehend all that, would be more accurate in there writing? But then again, it reads like another language to me anyways. So...let's hope for the best.
GLTA
Posts: 616 | From: Mid West | Registered: Mar 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
I hope these guys don't start talking about how much they like to keep investers on track. That will look suspicious.
Posts: 4245 | From: SMALLVILLE USA | Registered: May 2004
| IP: Logged |
Ironically, the scam I got suckered into last year, by the CEO of a different company, was being looked into by the person I wanted to call,,,,,and I just noticed that they reversed split a third time and changed the bogus companies name a third time and the SEC just chooses to ignore it..
So I will just try the number provided by the SEC pertaining to the KSWJ halt and see where it gets me..
Posts: 793 | Registered: Aug 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
I got this from iHub. Take it for what it's worth but I do agree with the late PR last Friday.
Good morning folks, I had a long talk with my broker yesterday and he made some interesting suggestions "Off The Record" I explained everything that has been going on in length and asked for a little insight. He has suggested that perhaps Ksw is using this suspension to buy some additional time to get deals and/or patents closer to completion. There has been no mention by the SEC in regards to any litigation against the company and that is a very good sign. He also suggested that if Mr. Anderson or KSW was not legitimate, their 11th hour press release regarding the suspension would likely not have happened for fear of additional recourse by the SEC. In fact they may have listed the company prematurely in regards to their patents and licencing to raise a little capital for the initial expenses. Perhaps we'll see this come back on the ob market at a substanstially higher price. Either way, he told me not to expect any NR or correspondance until they are close to relisting. In all probability we should be OK in the near future. This is all speculation of course, but hey, we can hope. Cheers , Kim
glta
Posts: 3026 | From: Chicago | Registered: Oct 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
Highly unlikely, Homer. In the first place, brokers take a dim view of pennyland. Also, any broker should know the SEC comments neither one way or another, beyond the release announcing the suspension. Probably? The final sentence sums up the whole post...
posted
Highly unlikely, Homer. In the first place, brokers take a dim view of pennyland. Also, any broker should know the SEC comments neither one way or another, beyond the release announcing the suspension. Probably? The final sentence sums up the whole post... You're right, most brokers could care less about pinkies. Anytime I mention a pinkie to a few co-workers (they trade healthy stocks) they just laugh at me and tell me that I'm nuts! Oh well, I enjoy it and the last sentence does pretty much sum it all up. Only time will tell...but I still do agree with the PR last week. Nobody could be this stupid to release a PR about their suspension and be a scam but then again, I have ran into a few morons in my time...
glta
[ April 30, 2006, 07:04: Message edited by: Bob Frey ]
Posts: 3026 | From: Chicago | Registered: Oct 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
I've given the benefit of the doubt to KSWJ...
Right now the SEC isn't helping any of us with issuing a halt.
Why even bother with the HALT, it makes no sense to begin with, the HALT expires but this can't trade anyways under PINK guidelines,,,,the SEC should have just skipped all the BS and stopped this from day one..
Now we have to wait for KSWJ to do what???? Clarify the PR's to the SEC???
yeah and then what? Does it make it back to the pinksheets as fast as it was yanked from it???
If the SEC really wanted to help, they could just go right to Anderson's door and ask for the info,,,,which leads me to another question.....
How long is too long for issuing a follow up to a previous PR???
It was less than 2 months when we heard of the "negotiations" with other companies...
The SEC asked for proof of this??? Since when do they determine the timeframe for issuing updates??
So this all blows right back into our faces, becuase KSWJ can make good on the PR's send it in to the SEC,,,,,the SEC could be satisfied, but yet we will still trade on the greys if were lucky....
Thanks for looking out for me SEC,,,,,really.
Posts: 793 | Registered: Aug 2004
| IP: Logged |
Of course, looking at this from another angle, it could be big business working to squish this before it actually succeeds, freeing up millions of barrels of oil from the sand fields.
Sound crazy? I don't think so.
Anyone who has been around the block can tell stories of someone who had a patent or invention that was bought up by a big company, only to be put in the circular file, if you know what I mean. If this high tech mining is for real, it would actually be a threat to high price oil. Maybe it’s little wonder that it’s been on the QT, just a thought.
Posts: 616 | From: Mid West | Registered: Mar 2006
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Homersbud: Highly unlikely, Homer. In the first place, brokers take a dim view of pennyland. Also, any broker should know the SEC comments neither one way or another, beyond the release announcing the suspension. Probably? The final sentence sums up the whole post... You're right, most brokers could care less about pinkies. Anytime I mention a pinkie to a few co-workers (they trade healthy stocks) they just laugh at me and tell me that I'm nuts! Oh well, I enjoy it and the last sentence does pretty much sum it all up. Only time will tell...but I still do agree with the PR last week. Nobody could be this stupid to release a PR about their suspension and be a scam but then again, I have ran into a few morons in my time...
glta [/qb]
Homer writes, I excerpt:
quote:Nobody could be this stupid to release a PR about their suspension and be a scam . . .
lol, you really should read the GVRP thread. Not only is it a great example of how good folk can quickly assemble group DD, it is also an object lesson in scammy companies attempting to employ PRs to their benefit and the SEC's ponderous response. At one point? The company issued a PR to the effect: "DO NOT TRADE THIS STOCK."
The next day? Billions of shares traded, the result being that traders with Ameritrade were paid in approximately this ratio: $100 bucks ---> $15,000.
LOL, later, when the SEC *finally* suspended it? The company first issued a PR that said something like this: "We'd like to thank to SEC for helping our company sort this out."
ya--shhhuuuuure.
They retracted that PR--under SEC pressure, one presumes--and issued another that was much less slanted toward the notion that the SEC was smiling on their stoopid scam-attempt.
Bottom line? SEC protects broker/dealers and "the system" but not scammy pinks nor the individual investors involved, regardless of their "pledge" to protect individual investors.
Think about it...with the giant funds they have to asssure for the economy to function, isn't it much easier to simply stop a scammy pink, period?
Cost/Benefit, etc...
[ April 30, 2006, 07:05: Message edited by: Bob Frey ]
posted
I like to try and stay optimistic like some of you, but the lack of info from the company and the impossibility of contacting them makes it very hard to keep feeling that way. I mean I had to have emailed them at least a dozen times from several different email addresses (trying to be sneaky) and nothing! And some of this was before they were even suspended. And I know some of you tryed calling in the past with no success. It's just hard to keep the faith when they give us no reason to...IMO
Posts: 596 | From: New Jersey | Registered: Apr 2006
| IP: Logged |
With the recent spike in oil prices and the sky rocketing increases in energy stocks, don't you think it's about time you brush the dust off, come out of the closet, answer the telephone and get this trading again, so we can all make truck loads of $$$$$. Hello, anyone home ???
Posts: 616 | From: Mid West | Registered: Mar 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
Scottrade - "Unable to enter the order because this security is currently unavailable for trading online."
Posts: 270 | From: Fullerton, CA | Registered: Mar 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
Weird....a 100,000 trade at .0001...so that's $10?? Maybe someone was just testing it out to see if it would go through. It still won't allow trades on scottrade. But that little # sign that was showing next to the symbol on my scottrade account has disappeared. Beats me what that means as I am completely lost in this matter, lol.
Posts: 596 | From: New Jersey | Registered: Apr 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
I called scottrade with an order for 10 mil at .0001. Didn't work. They called there headquarters and found out the ask is .05, thats right a nickel. Probably another mistake, but I told them to forget it, I wasn't going to spend 50 grand on that. The 1+ mil shares I have right now is only worth 100+ bucks. So it's a mystery whats going on.
Posts: 4245 | From: SMALLVILLE USA | Registered: May 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
Scottrade says they don't know who set the price. Is your allstocks screwing up as usual? Like mine is?
Posts: 4245 | From: SMALLVILLE USA | Registered: May 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
the word "if" was used when referring to a reverse split. Don't think anyone tried to say it was a done deal or even whether they believed it to be the case.
Everyone wants to know what the deal is here, only time will tell I guess.
Posts: 177 | From: Quebec | Registered: Mar 2006
| IP: Logged |