posted
welcome, has some good stuff on it...looking forward to hearing what he says...I emailed again tonight, maybe my last email got lost or in a spam folder because some on another thread posted after me that they all received replies...One thing I guess is that we can only go down too .001 and I will load up if we do for at least a dead cat bounce...will be interesting to see what "interesteddddd" found out on his test. I used to wrap shipping pallets when I worked on a loading dock back in college and the stuff then held good...interesteddddd said "Clings nicely to itself, But when tension is added it does okay" I never heard the outcome of the final test...We actually looked like we had some support on L2 today on the bid at .0054 but they lowered it with about every sell, BUT when there was a buy at the ask they didn't even budge it, actually Nite came in and strenghtened the resistence above? I almost give up on it... GLTA
quote:Originally posted by buckstalker: Thanks Strike...
Looks like a lot of good info... I emailed Stefan Gudmundsson today with pointed questions about dilution, the product and contracts, and his ability bring the pps back to an acceptable level...I'll let you know if and when he responds.
posted
what would happen if the company recalled all certificates?
With the naked shorting, there has to be millions of shares "long" above and beyond what the actual float is. Am I correct in my thinking?
If they recalled certs to get a handle on this (if it's even possible), who'd get hosed?
I'm just rambling - no sure if this is even coherent or not
-------------------- Do you know what "nemesis" means? A righteous infliction of retribution manifested by an appropriate agent. Personified in this case by an 'orrible 'unt... me. -Brick Top Posts: 746 | From: Pawtucket, MA | Registered: Jan 2005
| IP: Logged |
-------------------- Do you know what "nemesis" means? A righteous infliction of retribution manifested by an appropriate agent. Personified in this case by an 'orrible 'unt... me. -Brick Top Posts: 746 | From: Pawtucket, MA | Registered: Jan 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
Update on the test...Strike, its been what, almost two days now. The stuff looks to be clinging about the same as when I first put it on. At least it hasn't fallen apert. I don't know what that means but, it does pretty good holding two Christmas presents together.
As I mentioned, the test isn't very scientific but I guess its something.
Posts: 20 | Registered: Dec 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
At this point I'm going to get that very strange look off my daughters face, wonding what the heck daddy is doing and put the presents back under the tree. I hope it helped. I guess all it tells me is stuff has a shot...
Posts: 20 | Registered: Dec 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
Thanks interesteddddd for your efforts.. sounds good... stock getting some action today with much more support on the Bid side... maybe they will let this run? Thanks again and GLTA
quote:Originally posted by interesteddddd: At this point I'm going to get that very strange look off my daughters face, wonding what the heck daddy is doing and put the presents back under the tree. I hope it helped. I guess all it tells me is stuff has a shot...
-------------------- Do you know what "nemesis" means? A righteous infliction of retribution manifested by an appropriate agent. Personified in this case by an 'orrible 'unt... me. -Brick Top Posts: 746 | From: Pawtucket, MA | Registered: Jan 2005
| IP: Logged |
-------------------- Do you know what "nemesis" means? A righteous infliction of retribution manifested by an appropriate agent. Personified in this case by an 'orrible 'unt... me. -Brick Top Posts: 746 | From: Pawtucket, MA | Registered: Jan 2005
| IP: Logged |
-------------------- Do you know what "nemesis" means? A righteous infliction of retribution manifested by an appropriate agent. Personified in this case by an 'orrible 'unt... me. -Brick Top Posts: 746 | From: Pawtucket, MA | Registered: Jan 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
Interesting quote from raging bull. What do you guys think?
Well, I just joined to reply to so called wise ole man. I need to ask why a RS would be better than signed contracts? The number of shares sold over the past few weeks is equivalent to about double the outstanding share balance. An argument for the SEC to get off its back side and do something to help protect the small investor. If the company would show financial progress then the naked shorts will lose their shorts. The company seems to have a sound product and are poised to make a move in the market. Of course they have been poised for far too long in my opinion but they haven't gone under so that is a good sign. I for one would like to see if I can hold out long enough to capitalize on a commodity that can keep pace with a niche in the market that is changing. They are one of the best positioned companies to drive the PVC free movement. Not that I am a tree hugger, but the truth is, if it makes our synthesized world a little safer then I'm all for it. And yep, I will try to make a little at the same time. I am trying to make a little on the side without causing undo pain to others, unlike the naked shorts!
Posts: 20 | Registered: Dec 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
holy chit... this means 500,000,000 more shares to hit the market...Filed today....R/S or something, but nothing good can come of this except a dead cat bounce... Good Bye and GLTA ============================================ SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 6-K
REPORT OF FOREIGN PRIVATE ISSUER PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-16 or 15d-16 UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the Month of December, 2005
Commission File no. 000-16008
DIAMANT ART CORPORATION
f/k/a ART INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION (Name of registrant)
5-7100 Warden Ave., Markham, Ontario, CANADA L3R 8B5 (Address of Principal Executive Offices)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports under cover of Form 20-F or Form 40-F
Form 20-F X Form 40-F
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(1):
Yes No X
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(7):
Yes No X
Indicate by check mark whether by furnishing the information contained in this Form, the registrant is also thereby furnishing the information to the Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934:
Yes No X
If "Yes" is marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the registrant in connection with Rule 12g3-2(b): ______________
On December 19, 2005, Diamant Art Corporation f/k/a ART International Corporation (the "Company") sold 5,000,000 restricted shares of its Class C Common Stock. As consideration for the sale of these shares, the Company received a total of $ 500,000.00 consisting of $100,000.00 in cash and $ 400,000.00 in forgiveness of existing indebtedness due and owing by the Company.
The Company's sale of the subject restricted shares is exempt from registration in reliance upon the provisions of Regulation S under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. Each purchaser of the shares of the Company's Class C Common Stock has represented, among other things, that he is not a "U.S. Person" and that the offer and sale of the subject shares was effected through an "Offshore Transaction," all as such terms are defined under Regulation S.
The 5,000,000 shares of the Company's Restricted Class C Common Stock which have been sold have a conversion right whereby, at the election of the holder thereof, each share of the Company's Class C Common Stock can be converted into 100 restricted shares of the Company's Common Stock.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
DIAMANT ART CORPORATION f/k/a ART INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION
Date: December 22, 2005 By /s/ Michel van Herreweghe Michel van Herreweghe, Chairman
Posts: 416 | Registered: Jul 2004
| IP: Logged |
By: lamigra03 23 Dec 2005, 07:04 PM EST Msg. 1917 of 1921 Jump to msg. # Not sure if anyone wants my take on this filing or not, but here it goes: They needed to show a little money in the bank and close to being debt free so they have the ability to be a good supplier of their film. A company like whole foods wants to deal with that type of company. The shares being traded here are all "restricted" which means they have a found a financier that is willing to accept this type of financing.
HELLO, that financier has been given advance notice of contracts or pending contracts or they would not have agreed to this offer. These are restricted shares and selling these shares right away is next to impossible, and would not even get them their money back at the current share price.
So, I say we all need to relax and see what happens next, but it can only be very good (as I believe this is) or we all will lose our money (Which has happened before as well), but that is why we are in the pennies becuase the gains can be so darn good.
Posts: 1364 | From: Somebody from Europe | Registered: Sep 2005
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Persia: Found on another board. Any comments?
By: lamigra03 23 Dec 2005, 07:04 PM EST Msg. 1917 of 1921 Jump to msg. # Not sure if anyone wants my take on this filing or not, but here it goes: They needed to show a little money in the bank and close to being debt free so they have the ability to be a good supplier of their film. A company like whole foods wants to deal with that type of company. The shares being traded here are all "restricted" which means they have a found a financier that is willing to accept this type of financing.
HELLO, that financier has been given advance notice of contracts or pending contracts or they would not have agreed to this offer. These are restricted shares and selling these shares right away is next to impossible, and would not even get them their money back at the current share price.
So, I say we all need to relax and see what happens next, but it can only be very good (as I believe this is) or we all will lose our money (Which has happened before as well), but that is why we are in the pennies becuase the gains can be so darn good.
Can you explain? It seems to me that a company like Whole Foods or any company would want a supplier that no debt and plenty of money in the bank in order to ensure orders are met on time. If you don't have money in the bank, you can't expand your operations so you have delays in getting the product to the customer.
Posts: 87 | Registered: Dec 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
I posted this on another board. Can anyone help with an answer?
lamigra03, I like your thoughts, But can you explain to me how a company with 80 mil SO can issue an option worth 500 mil when exercised? How is that done, legally? I am by no means an expert trader, I would say border line Novice/intermediate trader. So when I ask I really want the answer.
Posts: 20 | Registered: Dec 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
Is this stock going anywhere? I have over 500k shares but am beginning to lose hope.
Posts: 37 | From: Richmond, Va | Registered: Dec 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
I dumped this POS today...here's why... The key word here is UNREGISTERED... meaning they did it without shareholder knowledge
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities.
On December 19, 2005, Diamant Art Corporation f/k/a ART International Corporation (the "Company") sold 5,000,000 restricted shares of its Class C Common Stock. As consideration for the sale of these shares, the Company received a total of $ 500,000.00 consisting of $100,000.00 in cash and $ 400,000.00 in forgiveness of existing indebtedness due and owing by the Company.
The Company's sale of the subject restricted shares is exempt from registration in reliance upon the provisions of Regulation S under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. Each purchaser of the shares of the Company's Class C Common Stock has represented, among other things, that he is not a "U.S. Person" and that the offer and sale of the subject shares was effected through an "Offshore Transaction," all as such terms are defined under Regulation S.
The 5,000,000 shares of the Company's Restricted Class C Common Stock which have been sold have a conversion right whereby, at the election of the holder thereof, each share of the Company's Class C Common Stock can be converted into 100 restricted shares of the Company's Common Stock.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
DIAMANT ART CORPORATION f/k/a ART INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION
Date: December 22, 2005 By /s/ Michel van Herreweghe Michel van Herreweghe, Chairman
-------------------- ***********************
It's all in the timing... Posts: 4303 | From: DSA | Registered: Dec 2003
| IP: Logged |
posted
Anybody know if this has any support at all? Everytime you think this has found a support area, this gay-ass fag stock goes lower.
Posts: 1364 | From: Somebody from Europe | Registered: Sep 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
Jan 13, 2006 (M2 PRESSWIRE via COMTEX) -- **********, www.**********, announced today that these select companies have been removed from the NASDAQ, AMEX and NYSE naked short threshold lists: Novelos Therapeutics, Inc. (NVLT), Oneida Ltd. (ONEI), Stellar Technologies, Inc. (SLLR), United Specialties, Inc. (UNSP), Atlantis Business Development Corp. (ABDE), Diamant Art Corporation (DIAAF). For a complete list of companies on the naked short lists please visit our web site. To find the SqueezeTrigger Price before a short squeeze starts in any stock, go to www.**********/squeezetrigger.pdf.Posts: 746 | From: Pawtucket, MA | Registered: Jan 2005
| IP: Logged |
UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!
Printer-friendly view of this topic
![[Roll Eyes]](rolleyes.gif)
GLTA
![[Smile]](smile.gif)
![[Wink]](wink.gif)
![[Big Grin]](biggrin.gif)
