Member Rated: 4 Icon 1 posted August 08, 2004 23:09 Profile for ******** Send New Private Message Edit/Delete Post Glassman wrote : CMKX sold 5% of YOUR (the shareholders) mineral rights to them for SHARES--and they sold an option to buy an extra 10% of CMKX's mineral rights for cash.... if the real value of CMKX is the mineral rights, i am pointing out to you that they are being sold out of the company to another company that you may or may not get(dividend) shares in.... that's not important???????????
this is a lot more vauable than copying some of the outrageous statements that i've been reading.... i didn't see anybody else posting this information anywhere..... _____________________________________________ Hi Glassman, Did you answer my questions to you from page 1? One was Did you think we didn't read the SEC filing on UCAD? Another was- Do you think it is unusual for a company to move into a shell in the pink sheet market?
As far as this post of yours. UCAD does have some sweetheart deals for cash in exchange for mineral rights. We (the sahreholders) will be getting shares in UCAD and other mining companies. The dividends almost equal the present cost of the stock. We have a great lawyer who is looking out for the shareholders interests. One way or another we will get the value that is in CMKX to the shareholders.
Do you understand this next paragraph? UCAD is coming TO THE SHAREHOLDERS-not to CMKX. So if CMKX gets some cash that is great and not at all unusual. Why wouldn't the company get cash when that is why companies sell stock in the first place. They certainly haven't been getting cash for the naked shorted shares the MM's have been spinning.
Glassman -I am not seeing much value in the 'DD' you think you are bringing. Your amen corner consists of new posters who are suspect and a few that are not held in high esteem. If your goal is to chase away the stockholders who like this stock and have posted here for the last year -why bother? You may not succeed unless you plan on living your life on the CMKX board. And if you want it that bad we know other boards where we are more than welcome and this kind of baloney isn't.
Good Luck to all the longs in this stock. Trust the DD you have done and try to ignore the bashers. They are actually a good sign. Why all the energy to bash a .0004 stock? IMO-DD-*****
-------------------- Don't envy the happiness of those who live in a fool's paradise. Posts: 36378 | From: USA | Registered: Sep 2003
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by will: dw, I do not include you in the intoxicated faithful.. My remarks were made to the faithful that used to reside here, and were arrogant and dsimissive with me when I posed the question of the company being forthright and forthcoming. They had choice to be reasonable, as you have been, and are, but they chose to act superior, and concescending. They were insulting and tried to embarrass people to discredit them instead of posing real fact arguements to change other's opinions or positions. Just desserts for them, misfortune for good reasonable people. I apologize to you if any of my posts have offended you, and I am sorry at the current situation of CMKX, for your sake only.
quote:Originally posted by dwman: LOL...
YOU GUYS TAKE THE CAKE>>> I CAN'T EVEN GET SERVED MY PORTION OF CROW.
This is absolutely amazing. Names I have never seen are coming out of the woodworks all giddy about the plight of cmkx. Doc, I'm surprised at the little green smily showing a full mouth of teeth. I always thought that kinda represented a "ha ha, I win you lose attitude". I don't believe that is the way you intended it but my goodness. Look at comments from some here. Why would anyone find pleasure in the demise of a company so many have put blood sweat and tears in not to mention money. I just don't understand. Had it turned out differently, I would not have treated those of you who have been negative this way. Oh well...my skin is tough. I can deal with. I have said all along that I put no more in the company than I could afford to lose.
Your "Victory Dance" is premature Will.
Posts: 2375 | Registered: Nov 2004
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by will: I did not mean that they had to be reporting. What I meant was they refused to furnish the SEC required information to be on the list. They would not furnish the O/S to the SEC so that they could participate in the SHO. They refused to "report" the required information. Has nothing to do with them being a REPORTING company.
I thought the O/S also wasn't needed. 10,000 fail-to-delivers occur should be sufficient. Does the total FTD also have to be 0.5% of the O/S? Even if this is the case, I still remain skeptical of SEC. We should all know soon enough Posts: 45 | Registered: Feb 2005
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by dwman: I WILL EAT CROW TODAY AND THEN GET TWO RIBEYE STEAKS ON MARCH 17.
Actually, the crow is not bad at all with some hot sauce, I ate some the last time that CMKX made a turn around. Still have some in the fridge in case I need to try some more
Hey Doc,,, If it was not all that bad, why are you keeping leftovers that long. I can't remember cmkx making a turnaround. LOL
Posts: 1005 | From: Grapevine, TX 76051 | Registered: Aug 2004
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by dwman: I WILL EAT CROW TODAY AND THEN GET TWO RIBEYE STEAKS ON MARCH 17.
Actually, the crow is not bad at all with some hot sauce, I ate some the last time that CMKX made a turn around. Still have some in the fridge in case I need to try some more
Hey Doc,,, If it was not all that bad, why are you keeping leftovers that long. I can't remember cmkx making a turnaround. LOL
Not that they made a turn around with the PPS, just that they brought on some new board members and did a filing with the SEC, that is what I meant (actually dealing with business). But now this action of today leaves me with lots of questions and doubts about the future of CMKX. I have learned in life that nothing is impossible, so why throw the crow out!!
-------------------- Be Careful Of The Toes We Step On Today, They Could Be Attached To The Butt We Have To Kiss Tomorrow Posts: 4727 | From: Elk Grove ( Sacramento )CA USA | Registered: Jun 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
legal wrote: Your "Victory Dance" is premature Will.
Come see me when your thousands of dollars can't purchase a tic tac. I don't mean a standard package of tic tacs, I mean one lonely tic tac.
-------------------- A million seconds is 13 days. A billion seconds is 31 years. Posts: 4893 | From: Burbank IL USA | Registered: Feb 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
CMKX might move after teh 17th because it sounds like in the SEC statement that SEC is mainly looking into the brokers because of the shorted shares possibly or maybe the finacials actually show CMKX is worth .001 per share. Who knows can't wait to find out hope my 2,940,000 shares are at least worth .0001 LMFAO
Posts: 795 | From: Brown Deer, WI 53223 | Registered: Feb 2004
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by will: You want to talk about mean spirited and arrogant? Where were you when the faithful were dismissing people's questions, 6 , 8 months ago with condescending posts and remarks that equated to - "you're dismissed dumbass, you and your opinion", and "we know the truth, and you're a naysaying complainer, no one wants to hear your crap, move on, dumbass". Well, it's a little different now, and I don't see any of them apologizing for their mean spirits and arrogance. No apology necessary, a $25,000 stick of gum will wake them up.
quote:Originally posted by vman: There are certainly alot of mean-spirited people on here, dying to dish out a few "I told you so's". What is the point of it? Although I own a few shares and would love to see this thing come out the halt and make some money (doesn't seem like the likely scenario), I would rather it hit huge to quell some of the arrogance out there!
ahh those were the days... the best were "you are bashing just to buy my shares at a cheaper price!!!"
Posts: 193 | Registered: Dec 2004
| IP: Logged |
YOU GUYS TAKE THE CAKE>>> I CAN'T EVEN GET SERVED MY PORTION OF CROW.
This is absolutely amazing. Names I have never seen are coming out of the woodworks all giddy about the plight of cmkx. Doc, I'm surprised at the little green smily showing a full mouth of teeth. I always thought that kinda represented a "ha ha, I win you lose attitude". I don't believe that is the way you intended it but my goodness. Look at comments from some here. Why would anyone find pleasure in the demise of a company so many have put blood sweat and tears in not to mention money. I just don't understand. Had it turned out differently, I would not have treated those of you who have been negative this way. Oh well...my skin is tough. I can deal with. I have said all along that I put no more in the company than I could afford to lose.
Blood and sweat ??? Whose?? not urban he isn't doing a dam thing other than running around on the drag strip. Thief made out like a bandit. People complain .. give them time ... give them time.. if there are so god damn strapped for time why the hell are they drag racing? S C A M O L A thats why
Posts: 193 | Registered: Dec 2004
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by joeyisthebest: CMKX might move after teh 17th because it sounds like in the SEC statement that SEC is mainly looking into the brokers because of the shorted shares possibly or maybe the finacials actually show CMKX is worth .001 per share. Who knows can't wait to find out hope my 2,940,000 shares are at least worth .0001 LMFAO
Learn to read Mkay??? SEC is investigating CMKX directly as well as shareholders DUH!:
The Commission temporarily suspended trading in the securities of CMKM Diamonds because of questions that have been raised about the adequacy of publicly available information concerning, among other things, CMKM Diamonds’ assets and liabilities, mining and other business activities, share structure and stock issuances, and corporate management. Since the fiscal year ending December 31, 2002, CMKM Diamonds has been delinquent in its periodic filing obligations under Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. The Commission is concerned that CMKM Diamonds may have unjustifiably relied on a Form S-8 to issue unrestricted securities. The Commission is also concerned that CMKM Diamonds and/or certain of its shareholders may have unjustifiably relied on Rule 144(k) of the Securities Act of 1933 (“Securities Act”) in conducting an unlawful distribution of its securities that failed to comply with the resale restrictions of Rules 144 and 145 of the Securities Act.
The Commission cautions brokers, dealers, shareholders, and prospective purchasers that they should carefully consider the foregoing information along with all other currently available information and any information subsequently issued by CMKM Diamonds.
Posts: 193 | Registered: Dec 2004
| IP: Logged |
You can't post that, You have to read the statement over and over till you find one piece that you can twist into looking good and pump that for the good of the investors. You may be labeled a basher if you post the truth. Like the PR on MLON that has been turned into a good thing over there. ROFLMAO
Ric
-------------------- Invest with your brain not with your heart. Posts: 4405 | From: Bristol, Tn, USA | Registered: Aug 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
Report regarding phone conversation with cmkx transfer agent......
Hellen, at First Global, stated that the o/s was known and was ready to file. She stated that their records will hold up to investigation AND no need to jump off bridge when asked, "should I jump off a bridge". The person reporting stated that Helen said their records are impeccable.
Posts: 1005 | From: Grapevine, TX 76051 | Registered: Aug 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
Tell me if this seems like an odd statement to you guys:
"If any broker or dealer enters any quotation for the stock of CMKM Diamonds that is in violation of the rule, the Commission will consider the need for prompt enforcement action.."
The suspension is worded much like other suspensions, but this line really seems to take a stab at dealers...not the company. Just triggered my attention.
Posts: 45 | Registered: Feb 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
The Commission is concerned that CMKM Diamonds may have unjustifiably relied on a Form S-8 to issue unrestricted securities. The Commission is also concerned that CMKM Diamonds and/or certain of its shareholders may have unjustifiably relied on Rule 144(k) of the Securities Act of 1933 (“Securities Act”) in conducting an unlawful distribution of its securities that failed to comply with the resale restrictions of Rules 144 and 145 of the Securities Act. =================================
can you say DILUTION???
-----====================
The Commission temporarily suspended trading in the securities of CMKM Diamonds because of questions that have been raised about the adequacy of publicly available information concerning, among other things, CMKM Diamonds’ assets and liabilities, mining and other business activities, share structure and stock issuances, and corporate management
=================
Can you say lying SOB's???
-------------------- "keep your stick on the ice & your cup firmly in place" Posts: 3651 | From: Algonac, MI. 48001 | Registered: Jun 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
Ric, I wonder why MLON was not halted for even 1 day
quote:Originally posted by Ric: boised,
You can't post that, You have to read the statement over and over till you find one piece that you can twist into looking good and pump that for the good of the investors. You may be labeled a basher if you post the truth. Like the PR on MLON that has been turned into a good thing over there. ROFLMAO
quote:Originally posted by TruthTeller: Ric, I wonder why MLON was not halted for even 1 day
quote:Originally posted by Ric: boised,
You can't post that, You have to read the statement over and over till you find one piece that you can twist into looking good and pump that for the good of the investors. You may be labeled a basher if you post the truth. Like the PR on MLON that has been turned into a good thing over there. ROFLMAO
Ric
Investigation was already complete
Posts: 193 | Registered: Dec 2004
| IP: Logged |
Rate Member posted March 03, 2005 17:35 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Ric, I wonder why MLON was not halted for even 1 day
=======================================
as it would seem ric is not here at the moment i'll take this one...lol...mario didn't lie as much as UC & mlon's o/s is only 12 billion peanuts as compared to cmkx. i also dont remember seeing mario putting signs on race cars asking "Got CMKX?". you dont call a sample diamondferous when the flecks make a grain of salt look big. you don't increase the a/s by 300 billion shares & 3 days later have 279 billion of those new shares show up in a dividend split. you don't change t/a's and then find out 1 yr later that you have had over 500 shareholders for over 2 yrs, you find this out when you change t/a's. might be why they went back to the first t/a. the second brought up the problem. could be why UC tried to be his own t/a, hide the problem. i'm guessing roger earned his pay that day telling UC how many yrs he would get in jail for that bit of handy work.
see all MLON did was put out false prs. UC it looks tryed to screw the whole system. unfortunitly the SEC does not release the details. after the halt CMKX goes right back to trading. of course USCA had to report all activites. lets hope cmkx has to do the same.
-------------------- "keep your stick on the ice & your cup firmly in place" Posts: 3651 | From: Algonac, MI. 48001 | Registered: Jun 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
I have been lurking in the background for awhile mainly because I had nothing to add one way or the other. But what is amazing is how some people take an extraodinary amount of pleasure in the loss of others. Makes you wonder
Posts: 11 | From: Long Island, NY | Registered: Jan 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
So its like 'These guys lied in the PR', but we will let them trade?
quote:Originally posted by boised:
quote:Originally posted by TruthTeller: Ric, I wonder why MLON was not halted for even 1 day
quote:Originally posted by Ric: boised,
You can't post that, You have to read the statement over and over till you find one piece that you can twist into looking good and pump that for the good of the investors. You may be labeled a basher if you post the truth. Like the PR on MLON that has been turned into a good thing over there. ROFLMAO
posted
tomr929...thats where your wrong. there are many here that hold shares or lost greatly on cmkx saying what i am. there are some that still have hope that us so called bashers do feel for. they said they hoped but didn't come up with fantastic theorys on why cmkx was getting screwed by mm's & why it was worth at least .50 now, not at some point in the future. personally i lost about $1,000. i bought 2.062 million shares at .0005 & .0004. i still have 62K & a bunch of worthless dividend shares.
-------------------- "keep your stick on the ice & your cup firmly in place" Posts: 3651 | From: Algonac, MI. 48001 | Registered: Jun 2004
| IP: Logged |
USCA did not back off from any previous PRs, right?
All the things you wrote in the first paragraph are bad for us shareholders, but are those things illegal?
quote:Originally posted by bill1352: TruthTeller Member
Rate Member posted March 03, 2005 17:35 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Ric, I wonder why MLON was not halted for even 1 day
=======================================
as it would seem ric is not here at the moment i'll take this one...lol...mario didn't lie as much as UC & mlon's o/s is only 12 billion peanuts as compared to cmkx. i also dont remember seeing mario putting signs on race cars asking "Got CMKX?". you dont call a sample diamondferous when the flecks make a grain of salt look big. you don't increase the a/s by 300 billion shares & 3 days later have 279 billion of those new shares show up in a dividend split. you don't change t/a's and then find out 1 yr later that you have had over 500 shareholders for over 2 yrs, you find this out when you change t/a's. might be why they went back to the first t/a. the second brought up the problem. could be why UC tried to be his own t/a, hide the problem. i'm guessing roger earned his pay that day telling UC how many yrs he would get in jail for that bit of handy work.
see all MLON did was put out false prs. UC it looks tryed to screw the whole system. unfortunitly the SEC does not release the details. after the halt CMKX goes right back to trading. of course USCA had to report all activites. lets hope cmkx has to do the same.
posted
Doc.. By the way, the title of this thread is kinda funny. Sounds like CMKX halted SEC rather than SEC halted CMKX. Posts: 264 | From: ATL | Registered: May 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
Because they didn't need to. MLON went ahead and admitted it lied to the investors so there was no need for the temporary halt. The letigation phase started at that point. The way it will work now is after the 14 day stop status they will have 60 days to comply. After that formal litigation will be announced. If they still haven't complied after 120 days of letigation then a permenant halt will occur. Now anytime during this process the SEC can pull the registration if need be.
Ric
quote:Originally posted by TruthTeller: Ric, I wonder why MLON was not halted for even 1 day
quote:Originally posted by Ric: boised,
You can't post that, You have to read the statement over and over till you find one piece that you can twist into looking good and pump that for the good of the investors. You may be labeled a basher if you post the truth. Like the PR on MLON that has been turned into a good thing over there. ROFLMAO
Ric
-------------------- Invest with your brain not with your heart. Posts: 4405 | From: Bristol, Tn, USA | Registered: Aug 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
i told ever idiot THAT BOUGHT INTO CMKX that IT was a scam, no one listened, this stock is a SCAM, PERIOD
Posts: 33 | Registered: Feb 2005
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by TruthTeller: Doc.. By the way, the title of this thread is kinda funny. Sounds like CMKX halted SEC rather than SEC halted CMKX.
I agree, but the fact of the matter is that we all know what it means
-------------------- Be Careful Of The Toes We Step On Today, They Could Be Attached To The Butt We Have To Kiss Tomorrow Posts: 4727 | From: Elk Grove ( Sacramento )CA USA | Registered: Jun 2004
| IP: Logged |
Topic Closed
UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!
Printer-friendly view of this topic
![[Smile]](smile.gif)
![[Big Grin]](biggrin.gif)
