quote:Originally posted by vado: I think they have a low float ..thats what makes it more volatile.
I was in this one since .0018...then it went over a penny and I sold. I am in again. I think they have low OS and a great idea even if it's a scam it still runs well.
posted
Brandon the Stockpatrol still hounds ADZR which went from 20 cents to 1.20 in January. It also hounded SIII which slowly but steadily rose in the last 3 months from 25-50 cents to almost a PPS of 2.50 now (and I believe it will go higher). But in the case of SSWH they "highlighted" them only because of their insufficient infomation, since the company does not file and had unusual volume 2 months ago.
posted
On SSWH's homepage it says this: "Our first client will receive delivery of their order next week. We will be sending a press release out to announce the event." So we know they have a contract! And anticipation of the PR will help stabilize the price.
IP: Logged |
posted
Bo, I followed up on that link when you posted this message, i don't know how b/c the one below is wrong too, and it led me to a patent held by a gary Williams in the same town in Washington state as SSWH, I looked him up and sent him a letter, just received an email today, this is what he says about my inquiry about his relationship with SSWH, I am not going to post his email addy or phone # w/out permission but anyone can find him the same way I did, so now, where is this patented technology?
I have talked to people in the past concerning my technology but I do not remember the company you wrote me about. Maybe at this years SAE show in March at Cobo center in Detroit?
Other than that I have know knowledge of the company? Let me know how it comes out?
Gary Wilson
quote:Originally posted by Bo14172: gone to the dogs...
I'm assuming you simply didn;t see the correct link I provided in thye SSWH post about one month ago. You posted under that topic as well. Just in case everyone is getting caught up on this, yes, that link provided above is incorrect. It was a mistake by the person who orgininally posted it. (I'm referring to the patent link which takes you to a patent for radio controlled cars.
Here is the correct patent link... SSWH (Sports Wheels Inc.) patent: http://pa tft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u=/netahtml/search-bool.html&r=1&f=G&l=50&co1=AND&d=ptxt&s1=6,518,209&OS=6,518,209&RS=6,518,209
Without you being able to read the link to base your reference, good follow up. I honestly have no clue if Mr. Williams you refer to has anything to do with SSWH related patents. His was not a name I recall on the link when I first saw it, but good effort.
Being honest, I wasn't aware the link is no longer working. I will take some time hopefully retreive where I found it to see if it works and I can link it here again.
I was at the North American Auto Show in Cobo Hall in Detroit, which was in January, so I'm not sure if this gentelman was referring to another show or not.
Now that you brought it up, I took a more of a direct route just prior to posting. SSWH's site is up, and not only does it look good, but has good info (including contact info) on it. I called 702-990-3664. A receptionist answered and I was put through to a voicemail, leaving a message about where their patent can be referenced.
Thanks and be well. Bo
[This message has been edited by Bo14172 (edited June 30, 2004).]
posted
Did you ask Mr. Wilson if he still owns the patent? Quite often an inventor will assign his rights to the company that he works for and later that company will assign to some other company, etc. etc. so it's possible that he doesn't know who currently has rights to it.
I thought that early on they had posted links to a number of patents? Anyone happen to have those #s? I'd like to take a look at them.
New website looks good, glad to see they're updating. I picked up some more today in the low .002s
Thanks to all for the DD
quote:Originally posted by gone to the dogs: Bo, I followed up on that link when you posted this message, i don't know how b/c the one below is wrong too, and it led me to a patent held by a gary Williams in the same town in Washington state as SSWH, I looked him up and sent him a letter, just received an email today, this is what he says about my inquiry about his relationship with SSWH, I am not going to post his email addy or phone # w/out permission but anyone can find him the same way I did, so now, where is this patented technology?
I have talked to people in the past concerning my technology but I do not remember the company you wrote me about. Maybe at this years SAE show in March at Cobo center in Detroit?
Other than that I have know knowledge of the company? Let me know how it comes out?
Also, gone, I note in the body of your post you seems to try to clarify the gentleman's name in your research as Gary Williams, yet you post an alleged e-mail (Not verified with any headers or trailers or confirming identification) which has the name Gary Wilson at the bottom.
I mention that to clarify facts is all and where you were coming from in sourcing your information when you weren't able to access the link from my earlier post.
I'll post when a representative from SSWH calls back, but I hope the correct link helps. I rememeber when first reading a post with the "R/C car suspension patent", I was like "what the hell?". Then I grabbed the patent number off the Sports-Wheels prior web page (Patent No. 6,518,209) and plug that into the USPTO site, things look a lot better. I'm looking forward to SSWH's call to further confirm the matter.
[This message has been edited by Bo14172 (edited June 30, 2004).]
posted
Hey, first off the Gary Williams thing was a brain fart (my bro is a huge Maryland Fan.) Mr. Wilson was kind enough to respond to me, I did not think it fair to post his email address on this board (and it doesn't use his name anyway) but he did give me a phone number as well. If you like you may email me at marc welsh 2 at comcast dot net (nospaces of course) and I would be happy to forward it to you. I simply mailed a card to the address listed on the patent and he responded by email yesterday. Trust me dude I want this thing to go up as I am down 50% right now but not if it means scamming others! Think about it, if it was their patented technology why wouldn't they be listed as the owner or this guy would at least know something about it. I didn't feel it necc. to call and bother him more as he made his point in the email.
quote:Originally posted by Bo14172: The patent name is "Chemical resistant glass fusing composition and process for metal motor vehicle and building industry articles".
Also, gone, I note in the body of your post you seems to try to clarify the gentleman's name in your research as Gary Williams, yet you post an alleged e-mail (Not verified with any headers or trailers or confirming identification) which has the name Gary Wilson at the bottom.
I mention that to clarify facts is all and where you were coming from in sourcing your information when you weren't able to access the link from my earlier post.
I'll post when a representative from SSWH calls back, but I hope the correct link helps. I rememeber when first reading a post with the "R/C car suspension patent", I was like "what the hell?". Then I grabbed the patent number off the Sports-Wheels prior web page (Patent No. 6,518,209) and plug that into the USPTO site, things look a lot better. I'm looking forward to SSWH's call to further confirm the matter.
[This message has been edited by Bo14172 (edited June 30, 2004).]
------------------ Dear Lord, Please help me to be the man my dog thinks i am.
[This message has been edited by gone to the dogs (edited July 01, 2004).]
I like Sports Wheels because of the concept which has wipespread appeal of the product if sports teams and Nascar are part of the equation, the alignment with Laker Announcer Mychal Thompson (although I would like to know what his contributions plan to be, so far there has been no other word since his announcement), and their work to get a manufacturing and distribution network up to support their potential.
Great entry price at this time and more information will be known sooner rather than later. It's not an off the charts play for me, but it's worth a look. Now, if sport's teams and leagues sign on, it then turns into a strong play and possibly one to hold for awhile. Thanks and be well. Bo
posted
Thats great, but if they claim to hold that patent (which you know for fact) and if the listed owner of that patent doesn't know anything about them (which I know for fact) then where does that leave all of us? It is one thing to put out fluff pr's but lying about the ownership of a patent to investors is not cool.
------------------ Dear Lord, Please help me to be the man my dog thinks i am.
I'm with you 100% on that. On Mach's board, I listed many other questions they would be safe in addressing and shared with investors, which will clarify points many have brought up. So, I'm hoping to have the pantent issue and many other things answered in the next 7 to 10 days based on their response.
Be well, Bo
[This message has been edited by Bo14172 (edited July 06, 2004).]
The news out today is very good. The work Mach1 is doing today will include questions I presented to him. Those questions include your concerns regarding the patent.
If proof is in the pudding, then I'll be the first to say that today's news goes far in answering that question. They are obviously manufacturing and closing deals based on this technology.
I've chosen to post only on the above board now. However I wanted to respond to you here, since our discussions on SSWH on here were recent.
We seek many of the same answers, which I'm hoping comes to light over the next couple days. Today's news helped with that assurance.
I'm looking forward to Mach's report on his visit today. Bo