posted
Merryl Lynch has just put out a sector report on the differences in policy and how they perform under the two different admin styles---i invite comments
IP: Logged |
posted
Glassman, I read a report from the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco that compares the historical returns of the market between the two parties. It concluded that there was no evidence that one party out performed the other based on the average. The Democrats had a slightly higher average, but not signifigant, if I remember correctly.
posted
overall--i agree--but there are differences in sectors--i don't have the link yet--if i did i probly can't post it here anyway cuz of copyrights
IP: Logged |
Fairly short read. Looks good for the Dems during the recovery from the '29 market crash and in the Clinton years (dot com mania?), although the 'cans seem to have had the slow but steady thing going for them.
posted
It should be noted that the economic policies of any administration are not felt immediately. Often the affects are not realized untill after an administration's term, or untill the end of a term.
IP: Logged |
posted
I have an article coming about Seven things to do ahead of National Elections. Will get back on this thread. One note about the "Clinton" administration There never was a budget surplus, this was all projections into future years. VAN
IP: Logged |
posted
Yep Van, couldn't agree more, there never was any surplus under Clinton, and his economic policies led to a recession, then aided by 9/11. Fortunately there is a business man in office right now who has helped remove some governmental hinderance thereby allowing an economic rebound.
UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!
Printer-friendly view of this topic
