quote:Originally posted by beatheodds: Some DD on the Marquee Website. Financials from Marquett Website Revenue: $63,047,611.00 Gross: $28,371,424.95 Net Profits: $15,879,839.69
Financials from Sulja website Revenue: $65,487,679 Gross: $29,105,097 Net Profits: cant find it on statement
My thoughts: the numbers posted on the marquett website are the actual numbers that will be in the audited financials.
quote:Originally posted by dog: Is it just me, or does it seem that we are in a week of painful waiting?
Tip on SLJB.... drive across to Windsor and check out the business for yourself.
Just went via satellite on google maps. 2055 Huron Church Rd Windsor, ON, Canada Looks like a pretty big warehouse and piece of property. What do you know about this dog?
-------------------- All post are my opinion. Do your own DD. Who's clicking your buy/sell button!? Posts: 7800 | From: Virginia | Registered: May 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
web site improvements.... they think they will be moving to the NASDAQ pretty quick huh? pictures from inside showing monitors that may someday show SLJB. LOL 18th - the 23rd to see the real audited? Kool. This week should be a trip.
-------------------- All post are my opinion. Do your own DD. Who's clicking your buy/sell button!? Posts: 7800 | From: Virginia | Registered: May 2006
| IP: Logged |
-------------------- All post are my opinion. Do your own DD. Who's clicking your buy/sell button!? Posts: 7800 | From: Virginia | Registered: May 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
**** Conversation tonight 10/21/06 with Petar(Tied the question with the answer)Hope this helps.
• Petar says: Hello. Comment by Petar October 21st, 2006 * 8:45 pm
suljaholder says: Hello. Everyone’s excited. Hope you’re having a good weekend, Petar. How is your AF review going? If I might as a 2nd question, do you still feel the 2007 pro forma is on track? And/or the $124M Germany deal (Emaar) and the $350M cement contract? Thank you! Comment by suljaholder October 21st, 2006 * 8:47 pm
• Petar says: AF review is very boring but must be done of course. As far as future contracts are concerned, I fell our offices in the Middle East will easily reach their targets. Our Egypt office is actually looking into the partial purchase of a cement plant. Very expensive but very profitable. Hope you are having a good weekend also. Comment by Petar October 21st, 2006 * 8:55 pm
• eelfland says: Hey! I’ve been appreciating the good work you’ve been doing. I know you’re going to release the audited numbers as soon as you get to it, so I’m not worried about that, but I would like to be reassured that the big cement deal is still on, and if there are any other similar deals in the works that we can look forward to. Again, thanks! Comment by eelfland October 21st, 2006 * 8:55 pm
• Petar says: I will be announcing some completed deals very shortly. Comment by Petar October 21st, 2006 * 8:58 pm
• Davecast says: Hello Petar, How do you find time to spend with us, surely time is at a pemium for you. We do appreciate the effort you have put into satisfying our appetite for information. We look forward to a great Monday. Comment by Davecast October 21st, 2006 * 8:58 pm
• Petar says: I wish I had more time to spend with all of you. Unfortunately, however, I do have a job to do. I am hoping that late Monday I will be able to post what everybody is waiting for. There is nothing that would make me happier. I should really have our people clean up this site again. Either that or I just don’t know how to work it too well. Comment by Petar October 21st, 2006 * 9:02 pm
• Angela says: Hi, Petar Is Marquee still the IR firm representing Sulja? Thanks Angela Comment by Angela October 21st, 2006 * 9:02 pm
Petar says: Hey Angela. It was nice to have finally met you. Marquee has done a wonderful job representing our firm in the past. I believe that every firm and its board should be directly responsible to the shareholders. This is why I have made the decision to handle IR in house. Marquee did the best they could with the information they were provided, however, at this time it will be my staff and I who will be handling IR. I would like to that thank the people of Marquee for all the hard work and taking a few on the chin for me. Comment by Petar October 21st, 2006 * 9:09 pm
• papajohns says: Is it fair to assume that there are minimal issues in the audit regd your 2006 financial statements? Comment by papajohns October 21st, 2006 * 9:08 pm
• Petar says: This audit touches very little on the 2006 year. Our year end was May 31 in the past but has been changed to Dec. 31 now. Comment by Petar October 21st, 2006 * 9:11 pm
• sue says: Good evening Petar, I trust you are feeling better, I was just wondering if you have completed that purchase of the lumber mills. I believe you said there were two mills, one in BC and the other in Seattle/Seattle area? Comment by sue October 21st, 2006 * 9:10 pm
Petar says: The company who owns the mill has reconsidered the original sale price since a resolution has been reached on softwood lumber tariffs. We are now forced to revisit the project and see if the higher cost still works. Comment by Petar October 21st, 2006 * 9:15 pm
• Jerry says: Petar, Thank you very much for your update, we all know how busy you must be, and to find a little time for us means a lot. Keep up the good work. Jerry Long on SLJB Comment by Jerry October 21st, 2006 * 9:15 pm
• Petar says: I’m sorry…my answers seem so rude and short. Under meds tonight: don’t want to appear rude. Comment by Petar October 21st, 2006 * 9:17 pm
• sue says: There are many investors who post here as well as the IHUB board. I know many of them would like to have the opportunity to meet and speak to you on a face to face basis. Have you considered a stockholder meeting, perhaps in windsor. I believe thay have at least one very large hotel which would be capable of a large group of people. Comment by sue October 21st, 2006 * 9:16 pm
• Petar says: Nothing but room in Windsor. Everybody is welcome to visit. I am sure the tourism bureau will love it. Comment by Petar October 21st, 2006 * 9:19 pm
Petar says: I would really rather have it somewhere warm. Comment by Petar October 21st, 2006 * 9:20 pm
• spaceheater says: So you’re saying that this audit will encompass the period up through May 31, 2006? Will it also be for three years to satisfy a requirement for listing on DIFX? Comment by spaceheater October 21st, 2006 * 9:20 pm
• Petar says: Spaceheater….that is what I am saying. One year. May 05- May 06. I have promised nothing else and that is what I am posting next week. I want that to very clear to all. Comment by Petar October 21st, 2006 * 9:24 pm
• Jerry says: Petar, That wasn’t a signed deal on the purchase of the mill. Now can we loose that deal? Thanks Jerry. Comment by Jerry October 21st, 2006 * 9:20 pm
• Petar says: It was a signed deal with stipulations, one of which was the return of funds to the Canadian mill by the US government. We would retain those funds under the original agreement. Their lawyers seem to have a different interpretation of this matter. Comment by Petar October 21st, 2006 * 9:27 pm
papajohns says: Petar, So I guess the year 2005 is from June 2005 - may 2006? If so, is the audit with minimal issues or are there any major restatements? Apologize if this question seems persistent. Comment by papajohns October 21st, 2006 * 9:24 pm
• Petar says: Well papa….I really don’t want to answer too many questions about the audit * this time (and yes your dates are correct). I’m sure I will be doing enough of that shortly. Comment by Petar October 21st, 2006 * 9:30 pm
• fdjr13 says: Can you answer anything about the DIFX listing?? Will you try to get listed and when? Comment by fdjr13 October 21st, 2006 * 9:28 pm
• Petar says: fdjr13: As we speak our people are looking into that matter. I have nothing to report at this time. Comment by Petar October 21st, 2006 * 9:33 pm
• abbam says: Also, are you going to supply the materials for construction of the world trade center ? Comment by abbam October 21st, 2006 * 9:32 pm
Petar says: abbam: We were not formally invited to do so and I am not certain that any contracts at that level have been awarded. A project that large so far from our North American Locations really doesn’t make sense. Comment by Petar October 21st, 2006 * 9:35 pm
• mksdaddy1 says: I was hoping the tariff refund was coming our way but I can see why the are balking (not laughing). Maybe split it with them and move on??? Comment by mksdaddy1 October 21st, 2006 * 9:34 pm
• Petar says: mksdaddy: That’s the way I negotiated the deal. Obviously nobody thought the refunds would be coming so soon. Comment by Petar October 21st, 2006 * 9:37 pm
• Jerry says: Petar, is the 350 mm concrete deal, a done deal for us. Thank You. Comment by Jerry October 21st, 2006 * 9:37 pm
• Petar says: Hi Jerry: Over the past couple of months we have managed to put together new concrete deals locating suppliers in Polland and Buyers throughout the ME region. I just signed on Wednesday one deal for $98,000,000.00 and there is more to come. Awaiting banking docs. from buyer. Comment by Petar October 21st, 2006 * 9:42 pm
mksdaddy1 says: You the man! (lumber mill deal) But the cement deal? That wasn’t lost with the phone call issue? You got a lot of investers waiting for that answer. You got the $4 they way we figure without it. How about a bone? Comment by mksdaddy1 October 21st, 2006 * 9:40 pm
• Petar says: First deal was lost daddy. Simply went to find more. That is why you guys are paying me right? Comment by Petar October 21st, 2006 * 9:44 pm
• fdjr13 says: Petar…Last one from me..How long before AF’s are filed on EDGAR??? Frank Comment by fdjr13 October 21st, 2006 * 9:43 pm
• Petar says: Fdjr13: As soon as they recieve them….same time I post here. Very soon I hope since they are actually in hand. Would be nice to turn the page wouldn’t it? Comment by Petar October 21st, 2006 * 9:46 pm
• mksdaddy1 says: By the by, if we voted, I would vote to purchase the cement factory. We/you’ll need it later anyway! Go for it! I’m here for years not months! Comment by mksdaddy1 October 21st, 2006 * 9:44 pm
• Petar says: I promise you daddy…A purchase this large….I would love to share some of the responsibility with all of you. (voting on it) Comment by Petar October 21st, 2006 * 9:48 pm
• papajohns says: Petar, Not that you need to be told, but isn’t details on new contracts confidential information? Or is it OK because this website **** is considered ‘public’ space? Comment by papajohns October 21st, 2006 * 9:47 pm
• Petar says: I am CEO sharing with my shareholders info. on completed deals. I see nothing “insider” about it. For all I know you are not investors or are twelve years old. (But I will ask the lawyers thanks. Don’t feel like spending time with Martha during Xmas) Comment by Petar October 21st, 2006 * 9:51 pm
• cactus says: Petar–Could you please give an approximate cost of the audit procedure that we just completed? Comment by cactus October 21st, 2006 * 9:50 pm
Petar says: cactus: I am truly sorry but I simply could not answer that question with any certainty. I am sure it wasn’t cheap. Comment by Petar October 21st, 2006 * 9:53 pm
• Angela says: Lets have the party in Fort Lauderdale! Comment by Angela October 21st, 2006 * 9:51 pm
• Petar says: Vagas Comment by Petar October 21st, 2006 * 9:54 pm
• Petar says: Thank you all very much again. I am not feeling well and really need to catch up on my sleep. I will be back soon and I promise I will answer some of the questions in the forum (once someone could explain to me why I can’t reply). Thank you again and good night. Comment by Petar October 21st, 2006 * 9:57 pm
Posts: 64 | From: Charlotte | Registered: May 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
Sulja Bros. Building Supplies Ltd. Announces Today That the Board of Directors Has Reviewed the Financials Sulja Bros. Building Supplies Ltd. (PINKSHEETS: SLJB) today announces that the Board of Directors have received the financials and reviewed them over the weekend. The financials have not been made public because there were some issues with the wording because of problems in translation. CEO Vucicevich stated today, "Due to the end of Ramadan and the celebration of Eid this week, we have not been able to make necessary changes with our auditors in the Middle East. Releasing the financials without giving them prior notice and making the changes would not be a good idea. I would like to state again, that we are in possession of the financials at the moment, but we do need to make these changes before we release them. If not corrected it would lead to a lot of confusion among our shareholders and we definitely do not want that." CEO Vucicevich also said, "We have no intentions of keeping the financials private, we are only waiting to make it more transparent. We will release them as soon as all necessary corrections are made."
This contains forward-looking information within the meaning of The Private Securities Litigation Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements may be identified through the use of words such as "expects," "will," "anticipates," "estimates," "believes," or statements indicating certain actions: "may," "could," "should" or "might occur." Such forward-looking statements involve certain risks and uncertainties. The actual result may differ materially from such forward-looking statements. The company does not undertake to publicly update or revise its forward-looking statements even if experience or future changes make it clear that any projected results (expressed or implied) will not be realized.
Source: Market Wire (October 25, 2006 - 10:56 AM EST)
UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!
Printer-friendly view of this topic
![[Smile]](smile.gif)
