posted
Yeah, i didnt really know. I figured a lot of people would still hold just because they know the financials are still planning to come out soon.
Posts: 596 | From: Kansas City | Registered: Jul 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
na, a lot of people arent even in this for the audit anyway. They are in this for the long run and for nasdaq eventually
Posts: 596 | From: Kansas City | Registered: Jul 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
To: rrufff who wrote (732) 9/26/2006 10:56:07 AM From: SOROS Read Replies (3) of 748
I've been holding on because I could not see how a scam could be so inept and bold. I have made a conclusion. It may be incorrect if I am missing something. I don't see how, however, but I am only giving out the information I know I have. Any one of you can call and do the same. I just sold my shares. I hope I don't regret it. I did it based on speaking to 3 different KPMG people in three different major offices. I was told that KPMG did some work (they did not say audit) for Sulja Brothers before they were a public company about 3 years ago, but if they were claiming that any office of KPMG was doing work for them now, then that was erroneous information. They were very clear on this that the last time KPMG did work for Sulja Brothers was 3 years ago. They said even offices in Dubai or Egypt or wherever would show up in their databases. These were not receptionists. I went through several departments to make sure I had someone in authority. They all said they have been getting several calls, so I'm sure others have the same information.
Based on this, I sold. If it's a scam, it has been handled with complete ineptness, however, if you go back and try and verify anything they have claimed from the beginning in terms of money earned or contracts or deals -- I cannot verify one thing. The public relations site looks like a high school student put it together and listed all the email addresses they thought would look impressive. I've tried to speak to them on several occasions and can never get through. I've called their two canadian places of business and got employees on the line only to be told that they don't have anything to do with that stock stuff and that I'd have to call Marquee.
Like I said, I'm not a trader or an experienced stock investigator, but I'm not an idiot either. My common sense tells me something is not right here, so I sold. I bought at nearly 8 cents, so I got out okay but didn't make much. Sure wish I had bought below a penny like many did.
-------------------- LIFE IS 10% HOW YOU MAKE IT AND 90% HOW YOU TAKE IT! Posts: 9276 | From: San Diego CA | Registered: Jul 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
To: atm_prophet who wrote (750) 9/26/2006 3:53:28 PM From: SOROS of 752
I can't answer for others. I spoke to 3 different offices. I even got the names of the KPMG CPAs who did the work for Sulja 3 years ago and confirmed this with another office. Perhaps I am more persuasive, but that is a fact, and that is why I sold. I know there must be "bashers" who bet against stocks and therefore talk them down, but I am not one of them. On the other hand, I also know there are the opposite of bashers who ask people to blindly ignore red flags and claim anyone saying anything perceived as negative is a basher and not to be trusted. I understand this too. When you have your own hard-earned money in something, you do not want anything to negatively affect that. All I can say is, if anyone says the information I gave is false or made-up in ANY way, they are 100% lying. The only thing I have read which could be a legitimate excuse for this ONE issue is if a private company held SLJB and that is where the audit is, but I find that highly unlikely because of how clear and precise they were about when they did work for Sulja in the past and how definite they were about them not being a client now. I guess the truth will come out soon.
-------------------- LIFE IS 10% HOW YOU MAKE IT AND 90% HOW YOU TAKE IT! Posts: 9276 | From: San Diego CA | Registered: Jul 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted September 26, 2006 04:27 PM -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- To: rrufff who wrote (732) 9/26/2006 10:56:07 AM From: SOROS Read Replies (3) of 748
I've been holding on because I could not see how a scam could be so inept and bold. I have made a conclusion. It may be incorrect if I am missing something. I don't see how, however, but I am only giving out the information I know I have. Any one of you can call and do the same. I just sold my shares. I hope I don't regret it. I did it based on speaking to 3 different KPMG people in three different major offices. I was told that KPMG did some work (they did not say audit) for Sulja Brothers before they were a public company about 3 years ago, but if they were claiming that any office of KPMG was doing work for them now, then that was erroneous information. They were very clear on this that the last time KPMG did work for Sulja Brothers was 3 years ago. They said even offices in Dubai or Egypt or wherever would show up in their databases. These were not receptionists. I went through several departments to make sure I had someone in authority. They all said they have been getting several calls, so I'm sure others have the same information.
Based on this, I sold. If it's a scam, it has been handled with complete ineptness, however, if you go back and try and verify anything they have claimed from the beginning in terms of money earned or contracts or deals -- I cannot verify one thing. The public relations site looks like a high school student put it together and listed all the email addresses they thought would look impressive. I've tried to speak to them on several occasions and can never get through. I've called their two canadian places of business and got employees on the line only to be told that they don't have anything to do with that stock stuff and that I'd have to call Marquee.
Like I said, I'm not a trader or an experienced stock investigator, but I'm not an idiot either. My common sense tells me something is not right here, so I sold. I bought at nearly 8 cents, so I got out okay but didn't make much. Sure wish I had bought below a penny like many did.
-------------------- Give me your Money.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Posts: 1720 | From: San Diego CA | Registered: Jul 2006 | IP: Logged | IMAKEMONEY Member
posted September 26, 2006 04:28 PM -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- To: atm_prophet who wrote (750) 9/26/2006 3:53:28 PM From: SOROS of 752
I can't answer for others. I spoke to 3 different offices. I even got the names of the KPMG CPAs who did the work for Sulja 3 years ago and confirmed this with another office. Perhaps I am more persuasive, but that is a fact, and that is why I sold. I know there must be "bashers" who bet against stocks and therefore talk them down, but I am not one of them. On the other hand, I also know there are the opposite of bashers who ask people to blindly ignore red flags and claim anyone saying anything perceived as negative is a basher and not to be trusted. I understand this too. When you have your own hard-earned money in something, you do not want anything to negatively affect that. All I can say is, if anyone says the information I gave is false or made-up in ANY way, they are 100% lying. The only thing I have read which could be a legitimate excuse for this ONE issue is if a private company held SLJB and that is where the audit is, but I find that highly unlikely because of how clear and precise they were about when they did work for Sulja in the past and how definite they were about them not being a client now. I guess the truth will come out soon.
-------------------- Give me your Money.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Posts: 1720 | From: San Diego CA | Registered: Jul 2006 | IP: Logged |
-------------------- LIFE IS 10% HOW YOU MAKE IT AND 90% HOW YOU TAKE IT! Posts: 9276 | From: San Diego CA | Registered: Jul 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
imake, i can't find those posts, care to give us a link? thanks
Posts: 1091 | From: Brugge, Belgium / Dallas TX USA | Registered: May 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
from IHUB Maybe Sulja Bros is not the client... maybe Consultech (who owns Sulja Bros) is the client or maybe Vista (who apparently owns Consultech who owns Sulja Bros) is the client or maybe Wessal Intl has purchased controlling interest (remember control-block?) in Sulja Bros and is the client. maybe we just don't know what's going on and that's why maybe we should just wait for the audit to clear it all up. maybe.
Posts: 130 | From: Dallas | Registered: Mar 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
lots of maybe's. How many PK's go the distance right up to the pont where they are supposed to become transparent? Then "PooF". Syanara Baby. Not the scam of the century. See if the DD pays off. Sometimes it's better to just turn the putter off for a few days and come back to $0 or big $$$$. LOL, not that I would ever do that, my wife does my tax's she'd Kill me!
Some good replies to that message in silicon land.
Good luck.
[ September 26, 2006, 17:07: Message edited by: BooDog ]
-------------------- All post are my opinion. Do your own DD. Who's clicking your buy/sell button!? Posts: 7800 | From: Virginia | Registered: May 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
now we get posts deleted again. IMO this delay could last a couple weeks. A slight delay in the AF compared to how long they have been working towards where they are going would make a couple weeks acceptable. In my inexperience if you feel better getting out and chasing to get back in if they do post the AF then that would be 1 strategy. I would expect a dip either way. Support has held this up pretty good. Just have to wait and see.
-------------------- All post are my opinion. Do your own DD. Who's clicking your buy/sell button!? Posts: 7800 | From: Virginia | Registered: May 2006
| IP: Logged |
Action Type: Amendment Document Number: 20060617400-56 # of Pages: 1 File Date: 09/26/2006 Effective Date: Previous Stock Value: Par Value Shares: 850,000,000 Value: $ 0.001 No Par Value Shares: 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------- Total Authorized Capital: $ 850,000.00 New Stock Value: Par Value Shares: 800,000,000 Value: $ 0.001 No Par Value Shares: 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------- Total Authorized Capital: $ 800,000.00
posted
Do your DD. This is awesome news. This can be the slight delay. Expect audits real soon. Wow!
Posts: 425 | From: NL | Registered: Jun 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
yeah that is very reassuring i bet we see a green day tomorrow!
Posts: 131 | From: Louisville, KY and Cambridge, MA | Registered: Aug 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
So who are all the tards who said that the extra 50 mil wasnt a mistake??
Seems to me like Sulja has been pretty dang honest so far. Only a matter of time before we get that audit!!!
After that the next big anticipation should be uplisting!
Then more big money contracts baby!! wooooo
-------------------- *I'm not a financial expert or advisor, everything stated is my opinion* Posts: 1680 | From: NC | Registered: Jan 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
Sulja Bros. Building Supplies Releases Share Structure WINDSOR, ON -- (MARKET WIRE) -- August 22, 2006 -- Sulja Brothers Building Supplies, Ltd. (PINKSHEETS: SLJB) announced today that the company is releasing the current share structure to the investing public. Sulja Bros. currently has 800 million shares authorized with 500 million shares outstanding. All share counts have been rounded to the nearest million.
CEO Steve Sulja stated: "The current outstanding shares are 500 million. There are 362 million shares held by insiders. Of the 362 million insider shares, 162 million are restricted. There are 138 million shares in the public float. The number of inside owners, of 10% of common class shares, decreased after the reverse merger. The increase of outstanding shares from 200 million to 500 million excluded holders of 20 to 50 million shares from insider status. Basically, three insiders with 40 million shares from the open market did not meet the 10% of class rule; therefore, they are no longer considered insiders."
This contains forward-looking information within the meaning of The Private Securities Litigation Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements may be identified through the use of words such as "expects," "will," "anticipates," "estimates," "believes," or statements indicating certain actions: "may," "could," "should" or "might occur." Such forward-looking statements involve certain risks and uncertainties. The actual result may differ materially from such forward-looking statements. The company does not undertake to publicly update or revise its forward-looking statements even if experience or future changes make it clear that any projected results (expressed or implied) will not be realized.
-------------------- LIFE IS 10% HOW YOU MAKE IT AND 90% HOW YOU TAKE IT! Posts: 9276 | From: San Diego CA | Registered: Jul 2006
| IP: Logged |
Topic Closed
UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!
Printer-friendly view of this topic
![[Confused]](confused.gif)
![[Razz]](tongue.gif)
