Terrible. Sad. A step backwards though I doubt she was half as clean as she pretended to be.
I have a feeling that after all the rage is exhausted this will get swept under the rug like so many other things.
What eats at me is that there are even odds that she was killed because she was a woman who dared to stand up and speak rather than because of the ideals of democracy she professed.
-------------------- No longer eligible for government service due to lack of tax issues. Posts: 5178 | From: Up North | Registered: Dec 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
this part of the interview was interesting.
quote:Despite the corrosion of her reputation by corruption and compromise, Bhutto appears to be America’s strongest anchor in the effort to turn back the extremist Islamic tide threatening to engulf Pakistan. What would you like to tell President Bush? I ask this riddle of a woman.
She would tell him, she replies, that propping up Musharraf’s government, which is infested with radical Islamists, is only hastening disaster. “I would say, ‘Your policy of supporting dictatorship is breaking up my country.’ I now think al-Qaeda can be marching on Islamabad in two to four years.”
the "radical islamists" she refers to is located directly within the ISI, they have more connections to terror, 911, osama.. etc than i can count. IMO if you want to stop terrorism thats where you start, but instead we just throw money at Musharraf and let his form of "democracy" take shape in the form of martial law, suspension of the constitution and the funneling of money (from the US) through the ISI to rebels in western pakistan and afghanistan. So technically we are funding our enemies, but since when is that a new policy.. only a matter of time before we are facing a government of extremists armed with some mushroom cloudy goodness.. god help us...
-------------------- "Gentleman, you have come sixty days too late. The depression is over." Herbert Hoover 1930 Posts: 678 | From: currently in hiding due to investigation | Registered: Oct 2004
| IP: Logged |
The Decider killed her when he decided to forgo eliminating the Taliban and Ben Laden and shift forces to invading Iraq, leaving those divisive elements to retake control of Afghanistan (as they have done) and to foment terror and disorder throughout Pakistan (where they are granted sanctuary by radical factions in the dictatorial Pakistani military using enormous funding by The Decider), aiming eventually, because of the unrest they create, to take formal control of Pakistan and usurp that nations stockpile of nuclear weapons (which can be delivered via military aircraft The Decider has donated).
Is anyone not belonging to the RNC puppeteers really too dense to not understand this? It was obvious that this was a probably result of attacking Iraq even before that atrocity actually happened.
Posts: 11304 | From: Fort Worth, Texas | Registered: Mar 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
"right now we are looked at as imperialists by the very people we need to be "recruiting"
And with very good reason. We are acting like that is exactly what we are.
Posts: 11304 | From: Fort Worth, Texas | Registered: Mar 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
There is no wondering who killed her. It stinks of CIA or any other department we don't know about. She was killed because she posed a real threat to the globalists plans for that country. Everything else is just fluff aimed at confusing and distracting a moron population.
Posts: 2965 | Registered: Aug 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
NAUDERO, Pakistan - Benazir Bhutto's 19-year old son was chosen Sunday to succeed her as chairman of her opposition party, while her husband will serve as co-chairman, extending Pakistan's most famous political dynasty to another generation... http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/22435920/Posts: 2634 | From: The highway | Registered: Feb 2004
| IP: Logged |
Its a long movie and you have to manipulate the bar to keep it going but its pretty interesting stuff about the possibilities of our govt's manipulations.
Posts: 184 | Registered: Sep 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
the only "problem" i have with some of the conspiracy theories is that within our govt there are also competing factions...
Bush and Cheney have done way too much damage to some of the competing factions, but not all of them...
i'm a huge fan of conspiracy theories for a number of reasons, but i also think that alot of stuff happens simply because of incompetence...
just to stir the pot hard, i'll throw out the OJ timeline as an example... he had to be perfect and lucky to pull off what he was/is still accused of...
yes it's possible, but it is perfectly executed with absolutley no room for errors...
watching football and baseball? we tend to remember all the beautiful "perfect" plays that get replayed over and over, but there's usually 10 or 20 or 30 orm more plays that just suck between the great ones
-------------------- Don't envy the happiness of those who live in a fool's paradise. Posts: 36378 | From: USA | Registered: Sep 2003
| IP: Logged |
posted
Conspiracy theories, Cambodia is a great one if you want to look at Possible US involvement.
The US apprehended a former General last year living here in CA. for the last 20+ years. This ex soldier was in the final phase of buying arms from a undercover agent to overthrow the current Prime Minister of Cambodia a former Khmer Rouge soldier. If you look back at all the principle parties in this whole thing (back to the 70's) it is just a marry go round. The US plays one side then the other.
It is rather an interesting history of events in Cambodia since the 60's with the US being involved every step of the way, un-officially of course.
Posts: 3875 | From: ca. | Registered: Jul 2005
| IP: Logged |
UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!
Printer-friendly view of this topic
