Allstocks.com's Bulletin Board Post New Topic  Post A Reply
my profile login | register | search | faq | forum home

  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Allstocks.com's Bulletin Board » Off-Topic Post, Non Stock Talk » More jobs gone...

 - UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!    
Author Topic: More jobs gone...
glassman
Member


Icon 1 posted      Profile for glassman     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Ford is cutting more american jobs now too..

--------------------
Don't envy the happiness of those who live in a fool's paradise.

IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
rimasco
Member


Icon 1 posted      Profile for rimasco     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
The economy is on the brink..dont let the dow and the chicken hawks fool you

The big boys know it too.....thats why they put all their money into GOOOOOOOOLD sending it into the stratusphere

--------------------
"Simplicity is the ultimate sophistication"

IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
glassman
Member


Icon 1 posted      Profile for glassman     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
gold is tanking too rim... soon? it wil be time to buy it again.. but not yet...

i'm trying to get my kids to learn to speak chinese so they'll be able to get jobs [Wink]

--------------------
Don't envy the happiness of those who live in a fool's paradise.

IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
rimasco
Member


Icon 1 posted      Profile for rimasco     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
LOL good thinkin...SERIOUS

a few of my friends took japanese growing up...while we all laughed and took the easier spanish

They all work in very LUCRATIVE fields now

As for me...i can communicate with my landscapers....SOMEWHAT!

--------------------
"Simplicity is the ultimate sophistication"

IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
hazeleyesMom
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for hazeleyesMom     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
I heard about Ford cutting jobs.
Before you know it alot of people will be
losing thru homes going into foreclosure.

I have heard that Chinese is a plus for those that can pick up on the language, its in the future, I've heard this over and over again in the past year.

IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
glassman
Member


Icon 1 posted      Profile for glassman     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Ford, GM both have cut jobs...

the price of oil is now dropping...

the oil co's squeezed the turnip 'til it bled...

the question now is will oil stay down or is it just dropping for the elections?

--------------------
Don't envy the happiness of those who live in a fool's paradise.

IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
bdgee
Member


Icon 1 posted      Profile for bdgee     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Just till the week after election.

Don't you understand that the framers of Chaney's energy policy had to make some promisses to get to set the table for their run?

After the election we will see even higher prices than this summer.

The deal was made in 2000.

IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Bill2Drunk
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Bill2Drunk     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Well, according to DCX, they expect that gas prices to stay between $3-4 for the rest of the decade. GM agreed with DCX's prediction. But Ford said, "ONLY A FOOL WOULD PREDICT GAS PRICES".

So, with that in mind....maybe that is why Ford is in the jam they are today.

I personally think its cheap because of the winter and elections. Now $2.08 in Columbus, OH.....WOW!!!

Also, DCX is really pushing the envelope on bio-fuels (CORN). Corn can actually be used to make gasoline and we all know....you can grow corn but you can't make oil.

--------------------
R1Man

IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
bdgee
Member


Icon 1 posted      Profile for bdgee     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
That isn't gasoline they make from corn.
IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Bill2Drunk
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Bill2Drunk     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
its ETHONAL....which is blended with gasoline. They say you can blend it to make the octane 85% and it will still run just fine. MOBIL and other jugernauts are 100% against it calling it "UNFAIR". How much did MOBIL make this year....more in billions than all the automotive companies in the WORLD put together.

--------------------
R1Man

IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
rimasco
Member


Icon 1 posted      Profile for rimasco     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Ill take this bdgee...ETHONAL is to0 expensive to refine and I dont remember the exact number but the formula was somthing like 100sq yards of corn is what it would take to power a single car for a year. (im sure bdge know the correct answer)

F*&K ethonal.......HYDROGEN is th answer!

--------------------
"Simplicity is the ultimate sophistication"

IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
T e x
Member


Icon 1 posted      Profile for T e x     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
HA!

gasoline prices?

Had a guy at the local BBQ joint tell me that the *original trader* who predicted $3 per gallon this year is *now* predicting $1.15 per gallon for next spring...

Caveat: this is total gossip...

supposedly this came over a popular radio show...


to me? rumor, rumor, rumor...

just saying--that's the rumor I heard.

--------------------
Nashoba Holba Chepulechi
Adventures in microcapitalism...

IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
rimasco
Member


Icon 1 posted      Profile for rimasco     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Gasoline as we know it will never go below $2 dollars per gallon again......well in NY at least

Ill be shocked if we ever see crude below 50 again

--------------------
"Simplicity is the ultimate sophistication"

IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
T e x
Member


Icon 1 posted      Profile for T e x     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by rimasco:
Gasoline as we know it will never go below $2 dollars per gallon again......well in NY at least

Ill be shocked if we ever see crude below 50 again

I tend to agree with you...

allz I'm saying is, a guy I know that I trust to not make up chit said he heard this on a credible radio program.

My challenge? anyone who can find the "first guy" who predicted $3 + gasoline? let's seeeeee the link...

If it's the same guy who's now saying $1.15 ???

THAT would be interesting...

--------------------
Nashoba Holba Chepulechi
Adventures in microcapitalism...

IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
bdgee
Member


Icon 1 posted      Profile for bdgee     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
No, ethanol isn't too expensive to refine.

To check this out, go find a catalog of a wholesale drug distributer or a chemical supply dealer and order 4 liters (that's a little more than a gallon) of 95% denatured alcohol. That's the purest distillation product possible, 95% ethyl alcohol and 5% water, with some legally required crap in it so it isn't fit for human consumption (you can't, via distillation, get it purer, because water and alcohol form an azeotrope). I haven't bought any in years, but back when i still did chemistry, I got it for about 20 cents a liter (in bulk.....by the tank car it is cheaper), and that included the profits for the distiller and all the middle men before it was dilivered and the cost to diliver it. (It's the taxes they put on the non-denatured stuff that makes it cost so much at the liquor store.)

And, though it burns cleaner than gasolene and diesel fuel, it still produces smog, soot, carbon dioxide, carbon monoxide, and some unburned hydrocarbons when burned......polution and global warming, in other words.

Hydrogen burns leaving ONLY pure water as a combustion product.

Fuel cells, supplied with hydrogen produced from solar, wind, and water power (or some other non-poluting method) is the way to go and, in spite of the claims to the contrary, would not be too expensive or even as expensive as what we do now.

Imagine the cost of producing just one or maybe just a dozen 350 chevy V8s from scratch and a 57 Chevy for them to power, from scratch, and by hand, i.e, with that cost not cut up by making millions of them. It would be hundres of thousands of dollars per car. That's about equivalent to quoting the price of a feul cell powered car of today and calling that a realistic price. That's not the realistic cost if they were mass produced.

There is a way out of this thermal trap we have made, if we start now and devote every effort to it. Half hearted or politically generated and controlled efforts won't work.

IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
glassman
Member


Icon 1 posted      Profile for glassman     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
sorry bdgee.. denatured alcy is way up...

if we want to get it cheaper than 1.50$ gallon? we need to find some new enzymes to break cellulose down into sugars....

the most likely place to "find" these enzymes is in the insect world or the fungi....

i did quite a bit of reading into termites hoping they would have a "magic potion" they don't [Frown] ...their digestion is several stages and involves a couple of symbionts...

look at what makes trees rot... that's where the answers are...

once the proper enzymes are discovered? then we'll genetically engineer yeasts or fast growing fugi to do the fermenting or digesting for us....

celulose is a chain of sugars, but they are tightly linked, and bound ...hence the strength

the price problem is the raw materials...
Brazil is using sugar cane and they can produce alcy for about 1$ a gallon... but they produce sugar cane so cheaply we can't come close to competing...

then you have to factor in that alcy is about 1/3 less efficient than gasoline so you use more gallons per mile...

i found that there is a sugar cane that grows well in the Southern US...

but? there is an ugly side to sugar-cane production too.. harsh labor conditions and they burn the feilds.... lots of air pollution...

IMO? they should harvet it all and use the "silage" to fuel the 'still [Big Grin]

--------------------
Don't envy the happiness of those who live in a fool's paradise.

IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
bdgee
Member


Icon 1 posted      Profile for bdgee     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
They have been growing sugar cane for a couple of hundred years and more down east of Houston and into Louisianna. And I'm told it will grow equally well in that part of Arkansas that grows rice.

There are a number of "facilities" now being built that won't depend on corn or cane or any special crop, but will use whatever plant growth that is available to produce a "mash' for distilling and the reports of pilot studies are quite favorable.

That $1.50 a gallon would drop way down if they went into serious production, be it via corn, sugar cane, or whatever.

Of course, if you look close, the cost of production and a healthy profit for gasoline is way down under $3 a gallon. And I suppose that with the politicians adding on taxes, that ethanol would end up around $3 or more a gallon too. Like always, the politicians like hiding taxes within the cost of something and telling us they are lowering taxes (actual studies show that the tax burdon on the average citizen has gone up after each "major" so called lowering of taxes by the feds.....only those able to afford tax lawers and accountants get any break).

But I wasn't intending to talk up ethanol fuel, even if it could "help" lower the attack on the environment. I advocate spending several billion a year on fuel cell research (including hydrogen poroduction), by the government, now, so that within a few years, we can "lessen" the attack and actually reverse it. Do that and it will repay the investment over and over.


Locally, almost every city, county, and federal vehicle, including busses and many comercial vehicles sport painted on statements that they are running on natural gas (methane)or propane. Individuals are disuaded from doing so (kits to do it are available in auto parts stores) via having to pay for a special permit to have a non-gaqsoline/non-diesel engine in a vehicle. (I am informed one does so with income tax filings.) Such restrictions need to be eliminated also.

Three really obvious things need to be drummed into the public's mind:

1. Government is necessary to protect us from attack from without, from each other, and from government.

2. Government that is sufficient to do those things is not without taxes.

3. Disguising taxes as part of the cost of various things needed or used by the people destroys any hope of a fair system of collecting taxes and leads to favoritism by government and currupt politicians.

IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
rimasco
Member


Icon 1 posted      Profile for rimasco     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Glass and Bdgee I love watching you two go at it. Its like clash of the titans of stats and figures. C'mon guys put'em on the table. Whip out those IQ scores. Im seriously curious.

--------------------
"Simplicity is the ultimate sophistication"

IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
bdgee
Member


Icon 1 posted      Profile for bdgee     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
I didn't know glass... and I were "going at it".

Quite often we have differing opinions, not so often about a "thing" but about what brough about that "thing".

Most of the time, I learn from him and more than appreciate his slants and tacts.

Knowlege is a delightful thing to hold. But I don't think ever we "go at it".

IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
rimasco
Member


Icon 1 posted      Profile for rimasco     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Ok bdgee now throw down you IQ score...serious im curious

c'mon be a sport

--------------------
"Simplicity is the ultimate sophistication"

IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
T e x
Member


Icon 1 posted      Profile for T e x     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
ewww...
I hope not--my tendency would be to wonder about anybody who kept track of something so arbitrary as an IQ score...handed out somewhen, somewhere, by Gawd knows who...

--------------------
Nashoba Holba Chepulechi
Adventures in microcapitalism...

IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
bdgee
Member


Icon 1 posted      Profile for bdgee     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
IQ scores are absurd and unreliable.
IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
T e x
Member


Icon 1 posted      Profile for T e x     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
who came up with IQ tests, anyway?

what was that person's IQ?

if I *had* to guess? either never tested, or pretty high...

--------------------
Nashoba Holba Chepulechi
Adventures in microcapitalism...

IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
bdgee
Member


Icon 1 posted      Profile for bdgee     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
I used to know the history of IQ test, but I don't remember it now. Personally, I think only people with low IQs still accept it as reiable.


Standardized test of all kinds are flawed terribly. Just look at what is currently happening with the standard college entrance exams. And why not get rid of them, they don't predict and they cost a fortune.

It's like the common question you find on all such test. They give you a sequence of three numbers, such as 1, 2, 3, - - -, and tell you to chose from among the following choices for the forth term of the sequence, a) 4, b) 5, and c) 6.

They assume, without saying, the 4th term will be an integer and also assume you will make that same assumption.

Even under that assumption, there are infinitely many possible 4th terms and no one of them is more or less likely that any other and that includes all the possible answers they supplied, i.e., there is no "answer" to the question, let alone a correct answer.

Sadly, I must report that the questioners are apparaantly not bright enough to recognize that mistaqke. I bet they believe in IQ scores.

IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
glassman
Member


Icon 1 posted      Profile for glassman     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
bdgee is correect.. in order to do well on any test? one only need understand what it is the questioner WANTS to see/hear... even if it's wrong...

here is a type of question that is common:

5. Which two words are closest in meaning?

Composite, synthetic, shabby, different, pseudo, symbolic

i could write several hundred words arguing for the incorrect answer...

does that make me "less" intelligent? or more intelligent because i can formulate a strong case for the wrong answer?
creativity is valuable too... [Wink]

--------------------
Don't envy the happiness of those who live in a fool's paradise.

IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
rimasco
Member


Icon 1 posted      Profile for rimasco     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Is it composite and synthetic? LOL


And the winner is Leo Davinci....I think thats accurate

Name Description Country IQ

Abraham Lincoln President USA 128
Adolf Hitler Nazi leader Germany 141
Al Gore Politician USA 134
Albert Einstein Physicist USA 160
Albrecht von Haller Medical scientist Switzerland 190
Alexander Pope Poet & writer England 180
Andrew J. Wiles Mathematician England 170
Andrew Jackson President USA 123
Andy Warhol Pop artist USA 86 (typo or drugs?)
Anthonis Van Dyck Artist Belgium 155
Archure Musician Artist Writer USA 147+
Arnauld Theologian France 190
Arne Beurling Mathematician Sweden 180
Arnold Schwarzenegger Actor Austria 135
Baruch Spinoza Philosopher Holland 175
Benjamin Franklin Writer, scientist & politician USA 160
Benjamin Netanyahu Israeli Prime Minister Israel 180
Bill (William) J. Clinton President USA 137
Bill Gates CEO, Microsoft USA 160
Blaise Pascal Mathematician & religious philosopher France 195
Bobby Fischer Chess player USA 187
Bonaparte Napoleon Emperor France 145
"A soldier will fight long and hard for a bit of colored ribbon" -Napoleon
Buonarroti Michelangelo Artist, poet & architect Italy 180
Carl von Linné Botanist Sweden 165
Charles Darwin Naturalist England 165
Charles Dickens Writer England 180
Christopher Langan Bouncer & scientist & philosopher USA 195
David Hume Philosopher & politician Scotland 180
Dolph Lundgren Actor Sweden 160
Donald Byrne Chess Player Irland 170
Dr David Livingstone Explorer & doctor Scotland 170
Emanuel Swedenborg " Sweden 205
Felix Mendelssohn Composer Germany 165
Friedrich Hegel Philosopher Germany 165
Friedrich von Schelling Philosopher Germany 190
Galileo Galilei Physicist & astronomer & philosopher Italy 185
Garry Kasparov Chess player Russia 190
Geena Davis Actress USA 140
George Berkeley Philosopher Ireland 190
George H. Choueiri A.C.E Leader Lebanon 195
George Eliot (Mary Ann Evans) Writer England 160
George Friedrich Händel Composer Germany 170
George Sand Writer France 150
George W. Bush President USA 125
George Washington President USA 118
Gottfried Wilhelm von Leibniz " Germany 205
H. C. Anderson Writer Denmark 145
Hillary Clinton Ex-President wife USA 140
Hjalmar Schacht Nazi officer Germany 143
Honoré de Balzac Writer France 155
Hugo Grotius Writer Holland 200
Hypatia Philosopher & mathematician Alexandria 170
Immanuel Kant Philosopher Germany 175
James Cook Explorer England 160
James Watt Physicist & technician Scotland 165
James Woods Actor USA 180
Jayne Mansfield " USA 149
Jean M. Auel Writer Canada 140
Jodie Foster Actor USA 132
Johann Sebastian Bach Composer Germany 165
Johann Strauss Composer Germany 170
Johann Wolfgang von Goethe " Germany 210
Johannes Kepler Mathematician, physicist & astronomer Germany 175
John Adams President USA 137
John F. Kennedy' Ex-President USA 117
John H. Sununu Chief of Staff for President Bush USA 180
John Locke Philosopher England 165
John Quincy Adams President USA 153
John Stuart Mill Universal Genius England 200
Jola Sigmond Teacher Sweden 161
Jonathan Swift Writer & theologian England 155
Joseph Haydn Composer Austria 160
Joseph Louis Lagrange Mathematician & astronomer Italy/France 185
Judith Polgar Chess player Hungary 170
Kim Ung-Yong " Korea 200
Leonardo da Vinci Universal Genius Italy 220
Lord Byron Poet & writer England 180
Ludwig van Beethoven Composer Germany 165
Ludwig Wittgenstein Philosopher Austria 190
Madame De Stael Novelist & philosopher France 180
Madonna Singer USA 140
Marilyn Vos Savant Writer USA 186
Martin Luther Theorist Germany 170
Miguel de Cervantes Writer Spain 155
Nicolaus Copernicus Astronomer Poland 160
Nicole Kidman Actor USA 132
Paul Allen Microsoft cofounder USA 160
Philip Emeagwali Mathematician Nigeria 190
Phillipp Melanchthon Humanist & theologian Germany 190
Pierre Simon de Laplace Astronomer & mathematician France 190
Plato Philosopher Greece 170
Ralph Waldo Emerson Writer USA 155
Raphael Artist Italy 170
Rembrandt van Rijn Artist Holland 155
René Descartes Mathematician & philosopher France 185
Richard Nixon Ex-President USA 143
Richard Wagner Composer Germany 170
Robert Byrne Chess Player Irland 170
Rousseau Writer France 150
Sarpi Councilor & theologian & historian Italy 195
Shakira Singer Colombia 140
Sharon Stone Actress USA 154
Sir Clive Sinclair Inventor England 159
Sir Francis Galton Scientist & doctor England 200
Sir Isaac Newton Scientist England 190
Sofia Kovalevskaya Mathematician & writer Sweden/Russia 170
Stephen W. Hawking Physicist England 160
Thomas Chatterton Poet & writer England 180
Thomas Jefferson President USA 138
Thomas Wolsey Politician England 200
Truman Cloak " " 165
Ulysses S. Grant President USA 110
Voltaire Writer France 190
William James Sidis " USA 200
William Pitt (the Younger) Politician England 190
Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart Composer Austria 165

--------------------
"Simplicity is the ultimate sophistication"

IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
bdgee
Member


Icon 1 posted      Profile for bdgee     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by glassman:
bdgee is correect.. in order to do well on any test? one only need understand what it is the questioner WANTS to see/hear... even if it's wrong...

here is a type of question that is common:

5. Which two words are closest in meaning?

Composite, synthetic, shabby, different, pseudo, symbolic

i could write several hundred words arguing for the incorrect answer...

does that make me "less" intelligent? or more intelligent because i can formulate a strong case for the wrong answer?
creativity is valuable too... [Wink]

Less intellegent, Glass....


'cause you spent all that effort writing something they won't even bother to read.

Still, somehow, I too squander my energy (as I did above, tying to explain the devil of standardization) hoping to say it in a way that will get through to someone and make them wiser.

If enough of us keep at it and those we show how they too can be wiser and think on their own and, then, they, in turn, do also pass on the secret of learning, maybe, somewhere down the line, we will make it a better world.

IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
bdgee
Member


Icon 1 posted      Profile for bdgee     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
I think a lot of those people died before there was an IQ test to measure it.

[ September 17, 2006, 01:18: Message edited by: bdgee ]

IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
T e x
Member


Icon 1 posted      Profile for T e x     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by rimasco:
Is it composite and synthetic? LOL


And the winner is Leo Davinci....I think thats accurate

Name Description Country IQ

Abraham Lincoln President USA 128
Adolf Hitler Nazi leader Germany 141
Al Gore Politician USA 134
Albert Einstein Physicist USA 160
Albrecht von Haller Medical scientist Switzerland 190
Alexander Pope Poet & writer England 180
Andrew J. Wiles Mathematician England 170
Andrew Jackson President USA 123
Andy Warhol Pop artist USA 86 (typo or drugs?)
Anthonis Van Dyck Artist Belgium 155
Archure Musician Artist Writer USA 147+
Arnauld Theologian France 190
Arne Beurling Mathematician Sweden 180
Arnold Schwarzenegger Actor Austria 135
Baruch Spinoza Philosopher Holland 175
Benjamin Franklin Writer, scientist & politician USA 160
Benjamin Netanyahu Israeli Prime Minister Israel 180
Bill (William) J. Clinton President USA 137
Bill Gates CEO, Microsoft USA 160
Blaise Pascal Mathematician & religious philosopher France 195
Bobby Fischer Chess player USA 187
Bonaparte Napoleon Emperor France 145
"A soldier will fight long and hard for a bit of colored ribbon" -Napoleon
Buonarroti Michelangelo Artist, poet & architect Italy 180
Carl von Linné Botanist Sweden 165
Charles Darwin Naturalist England 165
Charles Dickens Writer England 180
Christopher Langan Bouncer & scientist & philosopher USA 195
David Hume Philosopher & politician Scotland 180
Dolph Lundgren Actor Sweden 160
Donald Byrne Chess Player Irland 170
Dr David Livingstone Explorer & doctor Scotland 170
Emanuel Swedenborg " Sweden 205
Felix Mendelssohn Composer Germany 165
Friedrich Hegel Philosopher Germany 165
Friedrich von Schelling Philosopher Germany 190
Galileo Galilei Physicist & astronomer & philosopher Italy 185
Garry Kasparov Chess player Russia 190
Geena Davis Actress USA 140
George Berkeley Philosopher Ireland 190
George H. Choueiri A.C.E Leader Lebanon 195
George Eliot (Mary Ann Evans) Writer England 160
George Friedrich Händel Composer Germany 170
George Sand Writer France 150
George W. Bush President USA 125
George Washington President USA 118
Gottfried Wilhelm von Leibniz " Germany 205
H. C. Anderson Writer Denmark 145
Hillary Clinton Ex-President wife USA 140
Hjalmar Schacht Nazi officer Germany 143
Honoré de Balzac Writer France 155
Hugo Grotius Writer Holland 200
Hypatia Philosopher & mathematician Alexandria 170
Immanuel Kant Philosopher Germany 175
James Cook Explorer England 160
James Watt Physicist & technician Scotland 165
James Woods Actor USA 180
Jayne Mansfield " USA 149
Jean M. Auel Writer Canada 140
Jodie Foster Actor USA 132
Johann Sebastian Bach Composer Germany 165
Johann Strauss Composer Germany 170
Johann Wolfgang von Goethe " Germany 210
Johannes Kepler Mathematician, physicist & astronomer Germany 175
John Adams President USA 137
John F. Kennedy' Ex-President USA 117
John H. Sununu Chief of Staff for President Bush USA 180
John Locke Philosopher England 165
John Quincy Adams President USA 153
John Stuart Mill Universal Genius England 200
Jola Sigmond Teacher Sweden 161
Jonathan Swift Writer & theologian England 155
Joseph Haydn Composer Austria 160
Joseph Louis Lagrange Mathematician & astronomer Italy/France 185
Judith Polgar Chess player Hungary 170
Kim Ung-Yong " Korea 200
Leonardo da Vinci Universal Genius Italy 220
Lord Byron Poet & writer England 180
Ludwig van Beethoven Composer Germany 165
Ludwig Wittgenstein Philosopher Austria 190
Madame De Stael Novelist & philosopher France 180
Madonna Singer USA 140
Marilyn Vos Savant Writer USA 186
Martin Luther Theorist Germany 170
Miguel de Cervantes Writer Spain 155
Nicolaus Copernicus Astronomer Poland 160
Nicole Kidman Actor USA 132
Paul Allen Microsoft cofounder USA 160
Philip Emeagwali Mathematician Nigeria 190
Phillipp Melanchthon Humanist & theologian Germany 190
Pierre Simon de Laplace Astronomer & mathematician France 190
Plato Philosopher Greece 170
Ralph Waldo Emerson Writer USA 155
Raphael Artist Italy 170
Rembrandt van Rijn Artist Holland 155
René Descartes Mathematician & philosopher France 185
Richard Nixon Ex-President USA 143
Richard Wagner Composer Germany 170
Robert Byrne Chess Player Irland 170
Rousseau Writer France 150
Sarpi Councilor & theologian & historian Italy 195
Shakira Singer Colombia 140
Sharon Stone Actress USA 154
Sir Clive Sinclair Inventor England 159
Sir Francis Galton Scientist & doctor England 200
Sir Isaac Newton Scientist England 190
Sofia Kovalevskaya Mathematician & writer Sweden/Russia 170
Stephen W. Hawking Physicist England 160
Thomas Chatterton Poet & writer England 180
Thomas Jefferson President USA 138
Thomas Wolsey Politician England 200
Truman Cloak " " 165
Ulysses S. Grant President USA 110
Voltaire Writer France 190
William James Sidis " USA 200
William Pitt (the Younger) Politician England 190
Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart Composer Austria 165

lol, wouldn't surprise me if da Vinci had a terrific IQ, no matter who measured it...


what's interesting to me? On this list, notice how many "so-so" scorers have name recogniton--yet, some top scorers are virtually unknown...

--------------------
Nashoba Holba Chepulechi
Adventures in microcapitalism...

IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
glassman
Member


Icon 1 posted      Profile for glassman     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
cause you spent all that effort writing something they won't even bother to read.


Is it composite and synthetic? LOL

actually that is the wrong answer according to the test giver that would argue is correct..

and? i think i could do a good job of making the case...
so who is competent enough to make the tests up? LOL... Leonardo was....

he probably was a time traveler tho..and not too bright at that, if he was...

but bdgee is correct..it would be dumb to do spend two hundred owrds argung it....

--------------------
Don't envy the happiness of those who live in a fool's paradise.

IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
   

Quick Reply
Message:

HTML is enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.

Instant Graemlins
   


Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic   Feature Topic   Move Topic   Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:


Contact Us | Allstocks.com Message Board Home

© 1997 - 2021 Allstocks.com. All rights reserved.

Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classic™ 6.7.2

Share