Allstocks.com's Bulletin Board Post New Topic  Post A Reply
my profile login | register | search | faq | forum home

  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Allstocks.com's Bulletin Board » Off-Topic Post, Non Stock Talk » Christopher Cox, He Da Man!

 - UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!    
Author Topic: Christopher Cox, He Da Man!
Purl Gurl
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Purl Gurl         Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Warned you about Cox, urged you to write to
Congress about Cox. Now, he da man!

You boys did not listen!

As you know, Cox has a history of both civil
indictment and criminal indictment for his
involvement in bilking the elderly out of
millions and millions of dollars through a
well orchestrated Ponzi Scam. Some of his
partners in that, are still in prison.

Cox wrote the laws which led to Worldcom
and Enron. Cox is Bush criminal puppet.

Cox is a crook, worse than Bush.

Now, he da man! The SEC man!

Watch for a horrific increase in stock market
related financial crime. Cox will see to it.

That sucks, Cox.

IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
bdgee
Member


Icon 1 posted      Profile for bdgee     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Of course, Purl. Why did you think dubya appointed him? It's part of the take over.
IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
T e x
Member


Icon 1 posted      Profile for T e x     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
but, yowza, what a speech to da troops upon ascension....

too bad...nothing since then...

--------------------
Nashoba Holba Chepulechi
Adventures in microcapitalism...

IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Purl Gurl
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Purl Gurl         Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
You know I wrote thousands of letters to the senate
and to the house, to governors, to the media,
urging them to shoot down the Cox appointment.
He is voted in by the Banking and Finance
committee, one-hundred percent "yes" vote.

Cox, one of the masterminds of a Ponzi scam
which defrauded millions of dollars from the
elderly in California, indictments for his
criminal activity, enabled the Worldcom and
the Enron debacles, and now heads the SEC.

Be sure I am writing to Cox to advise him I know
he is a crook, I know he is corrupt and to advise
him I will nail his hide to a wall every chance
possible, deservingly so.

Bush, Cox, Rove, Rumsfeld and the rest. How
is it Americans are so blind to Bush and gang
destroying America for personal profit?

IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Krysten911
Member


Icon 1 posted      Profile for Krysten911     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
I don't think it is blindness PG, I think that the American public is numb to it all. Back in Nixon's era, the majority of the American people would not stand for it. We the people had the right people in Congress to stand up for us and get rid of the bad seeds. Now, everyone is so busy mincing words and mixing it up, no one knows anymore who is right or even what they are standing for. I am of the oppinion Bush is banking on this "confused" state to pull off this crap. All we see now are message boards of f- this and f- that, a definite reduction in the power of the movement. Go to Sacramento to get your permit to protest...let's be real...

PS- I have written my share of letters too, mainly to get the token- thank you voter for sending we will look into it... Sincerely

--------------------
Life only has so many choices, choose wisely.

IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
bdgee
Member


Icon 1 posted      Profile for bdgee     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
They have preached Party Party Party so long there are a couple of generations now that have come to believe that any and every thing not directly from the Party is unamerican and that patriotism is adherence to Party line. It isn't so difficult. Through the years, it has happened in one country after another. Any time you find any claim of a Party being the heart and soul of a country or society and that becomes prevalent, you end up with a quasi-dictatorship, at least. Nixon was a crook and lead a movement of thugs and crooks who very nearly usurped the Constitution. These are the same thugs and crooks and they have learned to disguise the takeover as party rivalry. Instead of answering questions, they attack the questioner with labels they have taught the Party faithful to hate, like Pavlov's dogs.
IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
T e x
Member


Icon 1 posted      Profile for T e x     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
I'm reminded of the guy who runs out of gas in front of a farmhouse. Long walk to the house, but it's the most reasonable choice on the old country road. As he nears, he makes out an elderly couple on the front porch, rocking, sipping iced tea...and an old hound laying nearby.

"Excuse me, folks," he starts--but suddenly the hound starts wailing...ooooooowwwwwwoaaaahhh

"but I ran out of gas" --oooooaawwwwaahhhh

"and I was wondering" --oooooaaawahhh

He stops talking and the dog stops.

He looks at the old man, still rocking.

"Say, what's up with that dog?"

The old man rocks, and the dog is now quiet for a moment.

"Well," says the old man, "he's laying on a nail that's stobbed up outta the floor."

"So why doesn't he move?" asks Mr. Outta Gas.

"Oh...he will--when it hurts enough."

--------------------
Nashoba Holba Chepulechi
Adventures in microcapitalism...

IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Purl Gurl
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Purl Gurl         Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
BARK! BARK! BARK!

Pretty funny!

Know what a hairlip dog says?

MARK! MARK! MARK!

Cats are smarter than dogs. Cats bury
what dogs love to eat.

IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
blue_in_MI
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for blue_in_MI     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
email re: cox i sent to my dad this am:

got sidetracked in my normal 5-8am stock research sat+sun mornings by researching christopher cox this weekend, as you probably know bush recently appointed him head of the SEC. really made me angry at both parties and actually the *democrats* most of all that his appointment breezed through. is sad, imho - i view the head of the SEC as someone who should be an investors *advocate*. yet - his voting record clearly shows he's taken a stance *against* investors greater than 95% of the time, literally. if you recall the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act, removing various protections from investors, from a few years back: basically clinton vetoed it but cox led the charge to override the veto, and won. of course it was arthur anderson, enron, etc that were the main backers of the legislation, and it led to things like investors having no recourse for things like enron, worldcom, and tyco. no surprise that worldcom was one of cox's biggest donors. a duke U law professor famously quoted the legislation as "the ultimate in special-interest legislation."

not to even mention the fact that cox clearly was a major mastermind in bilking elderly california investors out of $136M in a ponzi scheme, but of course bought his way off. this is widely documented, this is perhaps the most amusing link about it though:

http://www.johngraham.us/coxandfraud.html

it's sad, but imho - typical bush. instead of appointing someone who actually cares about the environment to act as an *advocate* for it, a typical appointment these days is to appoint someone who will immediately endorse strip-mining the ANWR. cox is no different - much like arnie with chevron et al, a bought-and-paid-for corporate tool, an ANTI-advocate for the investor, seeking yet more and more protections for companies. about as *classic* a case of putting the fox in charge of the henhouse as you can possibly get.

honestly i blame *democrats* most for not raising more of a stir about cox, a pathetic display that they stood by and did diddlysquat while he breezed through. i think this sentence from this editorial from the LA Times best sums it up:

"Senate Democrats' willingness to accept such a quid pro quo from Bush would suggest that this party has no fight, no heart and no soul."

entire editorial is here, if you read nothing else about cox, read this one - short, and quite well written I thought:

http://www.tompaine.com/articles/20050726/soft_on_corporate_crime.php

a detailed review of cox's voting record etc is here:

http://www.citizen.org/documents/PC_Cox_Rpt.pdf

honestly - i'm more angry with the democrats than the republicans over this one, they completely FAILED PATHETICALLY by letting cox breeze through without a peep.

IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
   

Quick Reply
Message:

HTML is enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.

Instant Graemlins
   


Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic   Feature Topic   Move Topic   Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:


Contact Us | Allstocks.com Message Board Home

© 1997 - 2021 Allstocks.com. All rights reserved.

Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classic™ 6.7.2

Share