Allstocks.com's Bulletin Board Post New Topic  Post A Reply
my profile login | register | search | faq | forum home

  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Allstocks.com's Bulletin Board » Off-Topic Post, Non Stock Talk » Computer programming

 - UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!    
Author Topic: Computer programming
Bob Frey
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Bob Frey     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Computer programming today is a race between software engineers striving to build bigger and better idiot-proof programs, and the universe trying to produce bigger and better idiots. So far, the Universe is winning.

Rich Cook


Posts: 3417 | From: Cleveland, Ohio | Registered: Jan 2000  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Art
Member


Icon 1 posted      Profile for Art     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Incompetence is spreading - multiplying geometrically - as liberals reward it (affirmative action, income redistribution, welfare, etc.).
Posts: 4402 | From: Florida | Registered: Jun 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
glassman
Member


Icon 1 posted      Profile for glassman     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
LOL...Art, it's spreading to India...just like the jobs....
redistribution of wealth is joke...never happens...

Posts: 36378 | From: USA | Registered: Sep 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
glassman
Member


Icon 1 posted      Profile for glassman     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
basically you got two choices...

as far as the maggotry goes...

you can pacify them,

or

you can fight with them...

it's much more profitable to give them the noogy...LOL


there's just no reason to be so darn angry about it Art....

some people are just never gonna be able to be what you think they should be....

conservative attitudes PROMOTE unchecked population growth...especially amongst the maggotry

[This message has been edited by glassman (edited October 27, 2004).]


Posts: 36378 | From: USA | Registered: Sep 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Bob Frey
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Bob Frey     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=maggotry&btnG=Google+Search

DOMAINS AT OUR EVERYDAY LOW RATES:

MAGGOTRY.COM

MAGGOTRY.US

MAGGOTRY.NET

MAGGOTRY.ORG

MAGGOTRY.WS

MAGGOTRY.NAME



Posts: 3417 | From: Cleveland, Ohio | Registered: Jan 2000  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
glassman
Member


Icon 1 posted      Profile for glassman     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
when i lived in the DC area, we had a shockjock that replaced Stern after the 14th st bridge joke...he was much better IMO, the Greaseman....Doug Trachtenberg..(SP?)

he had a little jingle, i think the title was Mingling With the Maggotry...LOL

however, since i now live in catfish country, maybe i should start a company and find a shell for this...
http://www.ias.unu.edu/proceedings/icibs/ibs/info/benin/songhai.htm

it's not like we don't have the expertise around here to make it work.....

any thoughts?

symbol= LRVA....LOL


Harvesting of maggots
Harvesting of maggots begins on the 4 th day after 1st contact of fly with substrate. The maggots are of the right size at this stage.

To harvest, proceed as follows :

i) Water the substrate (few seconds later, the maggots migrate to the surface of the substrate).
ii) Place fresh brewery waste and some fresh pig or chicken manure at the corner nearest the migration terminus.
iii) About 30 min later, the maggots are attracted to the substrate. Scoop the maggots with a hand spade into the collecting tank where the remaining brewery waste is removed with a broom. Harvest the clean maggots into a rubber or plastic bucket.
iv) Wood ash is sprayed on maggots in the bucket to prevent them from escaping.
v) Harvesting is done twice daily (morning and afternoon).The morning field constitutes

LOL

[This message has been edited by glassman (edited October 27, 2004).]


Posts: 36378 | From: USA | Registered: Sep 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
pennyearned
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for pennyearned     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by glassman:

conservative attitudes PROMOTE unchecked population growth...especially amongst the maggotry


[This message has been edited by glassman (edited October 27, 2004).][/B]



Democratic attitudes abort our future tax base.


Posts: 106 | Registered: Aug 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
glassman
Member


Icon 1 posted      Profile for glassman     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
i know penny, i used to repo a lot of cars from them.... good night..3500$ before expenses
Posts: 36378 | From: USA | Registered: Sep 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Art
Member


Icon 1 posted      Profile for Art     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by glassman:
LOL...Art, it's spreading to India...just like the jobs....
redistribution of wealth is joke...never happens...

When the top 5% of wealthy taxpayers pay over 50% of the taxes in the US that is redistribution of wealth to those getting government aid in some form of other.

Outsourcing jobs enables the US to compete more effectively in the world market, which raises the standard of living in the US. Only a very, very small percent of jobs are outsourced anyway.


Posts: 4402 | From: Florida | Registered: Jun 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Art
Member


Icon 1 posted      Profile for Art     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by glassman:

there's just no reason to be so darn angry about it Art....

some people are just never gonna be able to be what you think they should be....

conservative attitudes PROMOTE unchecked population growth...especially amongst the maggotry

[This message has been edited by glassman (edited October 27, 2004).]


Some people will not be what society expects them to be, but this should be their problem and not society's problem. Liberals make this into society's problem and reward the parasites.

How can you say conservative policies promote the growth of parasites - the opposite is true. Liberal policies reward the parasites, take care of them, allow them to reproduce in greater number, and thereby increase social parasites. Are you so dumb as to fail to realize this?


Posts: 4402 | From: Florida | Registered: Jun 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
glassman
Member


Icon 1 posted      Profile for glassman     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Art, i grew up in a family of people like you...
if i work harder everything will be oK?

only it never is....

nothing is ever perfect....

the European Royalty is a perfect example of your mind-set...they bred carefully for the qualities they thought would be useful to run the world....
ever hear of hemophilia? it's just one of the things that popped up unexpectedly...

where are they now???

America's greatness actually come from out-breeding....in-breeding only works so far and then you have to outbreed for true vigour...


there are plenty of people with SERIOUS physical disabilities who have been nurtured at great expense, and delivered significant advances to our society....

many of those people would have been "erased" by people with your mind-set...

[This message has been edited by glassman (edited October 27, 2004).]


Posts: 36378 | From: USA | Registered: Sep 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
futuresobjective
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for futuresobjective     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Art:
Incompetence is spreading - multiplying geometrically - as liberals reward it (affirmative action, income redistribution, welfare, etc.).

Amen to that. I should lose out on a position at work, or school because someone who has done half the amount of work is minority, I can not even believe that is a debate. I mean seriously, what is wrong with some people. Disadvantaged, underprivelaged? What a load of bull...., public school offers everything anyone needs (granted it some people might have to actually do work when in school), if you are not willing to put in the work to get the grades, what business do you have attending a schol that you simply do not belong in? My family came over here with nothing in their pockets, nothing, they worked their tails off and earned everything we have been blessed with today. Should they have been given handouts? ABSOLUTELY NOT!!! What value could whta they have today possible contain if they did not have to work for it. What a load of garbage. Certain programs make sense, but molding a society into thinking that programs like those and others should be their means of survival and advancement is just plain insane. People should work for what they have. It has been shown time and time again that people find it more rewarding to go out and earn wages, instead of adding more straws to the back of someone else. Why then would there be a need for such programs on larger scales? It just makes no sense. Pump that money back into the economy and allow people to spend it in whatever ways they see fit. Over time, that money is spread around allowing the creation of more jobs, allowing people to support themselves.

[This message has been edited by futuresobjective (edited October 27, 2004).]


Posts: 1153 | From: northeast | Registered: Apr 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
glassman
Member


Icon 1 posted      Profile for glassman     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Wealthiest 400 Americans paid 1.6 percent of all taxes in 2000, IRS says
David Cay Johnston, New York Times

Published June 26, 2003 TAX26


The 400 wealthiest taxpayers accounted for more than 1 percent of all the income in the United States in 2000, more than double their share just eight years earlier, according to new data from the Internal Revenue Service. But their tax burden fell over the same period.

The data, in a report that the IRS made public Wednesday night, show that the average income of the 400 wealthiest taxpayers was almost $174 million in 2000. That was nearly quadruple the $46.8 million average in 1992. The minimum income to qualify for the list was $86.8 million in 2000, more than triple the $24.4 income of the 400 wealthiest taxpayers in 1992.

http://oceanpark.com/webmuseum/2003/income_and_taxes_of_the_top_400.html


i suggest that anybody making this kind of money is getting their money's worth from the government that allows them the oportunity.....

hmmmm Clinton was president then eh? a liberal and the rich got richer...hmmmm don't make sense?

i get tired of the LIES


Posts: 36378 | From: USA | Registered: Sep 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
laststock007
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for laststock007     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by glassman:
LOL...Art, it's spreading to India...just like the jobs....
redistribution of wealth is joke...never happens...

I totally agree.

-ls007



Posts: 112 | From: NY, NY | Registered: Dec 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Art
Member


Icon 1 posted      Profile for Art     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
G.Art, i grew up in a family of people like you...
if i work harder everything will be oK?

only it never is....

nothing is ever perfect....

Art: So, quit whining. Obviously you didn't work hard enough.

G: ..the European Royalty is a perfect example of your mind-set...they bred carefully for the qualities they thought would be useful to run the world....
ever hear of hemophilia? it's just one of the things that popped up unexpectedly...

Art: Inbreeding is terrible - not what I advocate at all. You must have a large and variable gene pool. If you select genetic phenotypes with a small gene pool, like a few Royal families, you get too many recessive gene matchings and too many genetic defects.

However, if you do this with a nation of millions, you improve the breed and avoid the problem of excessive recessive gene matchings. We are at war, at least economically, with all other nations. We can not compete in the world market if we don't breed better traits in our citizenry, and our standard of living will deteriorate. Liberal policies increase bad traits, conservative policies increase good traits.

G.: America's greatness actually come from out-breeding....in-breeding only works so far and then you have to outbreed for true vigour...

Art: Yes, bringing in new genes increases variability in the gene pool. But the key is what happens then. Do you increase good traits and decrease bad traits, or vice-versa. Liberal policies increase dependence, lack of individual initiative, irresponsibilty, laziness, criminal behavior, addiction, pacifism and surrender when atacked, etc. Conservative policies do the opposite.

G.: there are plenty of people with SERIOUS physical disabilities who have been nurtured at great expense, and delivered significant advances to our society....

Art: Yes, and we want to help them do this, and increase their number and well being. However, we want to reduce those who take more from society than they presently give, or will ever give - let their families or private charities take care of them, and not society at large. Liberals would force society at large to take care of them and allow them to reproduce, even though they are parasites who take from but return nothing to society.

An injured war veteran has contributed greatly to society and should live a good life at society's expense, even though that vet will never make any future contribution to society. Such a person is not a parasite.


Posts: 4402 | From: Florida | Registered: Jun 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Art
Member


Icon 1 posted      Profile for Art     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by glassman:
[b]Wealthiest 400 Americans paid 1.6 percent of all taxes in 2000, IRS says
David Cay Johnston, New York Times

Published June 26, 2003 TAX26


The 400 wealthiest taxpayers accounted for more than 1 percent of all the income in the United States in 2000, more than double their share just eight years earlier, according to new data from the Internal Revenue Service. But their tax burden fell over the same period.

The data, in a report that the IRS made public Wednesday night, show that the average income of the 400 wealthiest taxpayers was almost $174 million in 2000. That was nearly quadruple the $46.8 million average in 1992. The minimum income to qualify for the list was $86.8 million in 2000, more than triple the $24.4 income of the 400 wealthiest taxpayers in 1992.

http://oceanpark.com/webmuseum/2003/income_and_taxes_of_the_top_400.html


i suggest that anybody making this kind of money is getting their money's worth from the government that allows them the oportunity.....

hmmmm Clinton was president then eh? a liberal and the rich got richer...hmmmm don't make sense?

i get tired of the LIES[/B]


So, it is fair that .0000015 percent of the population pay over 1 percent of the tax? This is grossly unfair - the rich pay far more percentage-wise than anyone else, and most of the poor pay nothing. Clinton, you, and the liberals are the liars. Are you still of the opinion that their is no income redistribution in tax policies?


Posts: 4402 | From: Florida | Registered: Jun 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
glassman
Member


Icon 1 posted      Profile for glassman     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Art:
So, it is fair that .0000015 percent of the population pay over 1 percent of the tax? This is grossly unfair - the rich pay far more percentage-wise than anyone else, and most of the poor pay nothing. Clinton, you, and the liberals are the liars. Are you still of the opinion that their is no income redistribution in tax policies?

Art....i never said Clinton or Kerry were honest...they are no LESS honest than Bush and Cheney or the so-called conservatives....

Agreed,my statement that there is no wealth re-distribution was not a TRUE statement... i was being sarcastic...of course there HAS been wealth distribution...but, very little of it occurs by sweat and hard work ...

and yes, it is FAIR for people making a lot of money to pay higher taxes....
why?
because without the government they WON'T make all that money....
the government is the tool that allows them to gain this wealth....
most of the wealth of this nation is built on the FEDERAL highway system(thank you IKE)

it is also cheaper for them to pay the taxes than it is for them to ATTEMPT to make this kind of wealth in a feudal system....
a lot cheaper....because they are SHARING the burden of their defense...and the more you have, the more you NEED to protect...it doesn't take a genius to figure that out....

we have a pretty good system...
the struggle for change and the struggle we are seeing in politics is actually a sign of good health IMO....

it is kind of dumb how vicious things are becoming....

the founding fathers would have been labelel LIBERALS by todays standards...LOL


Thomas Jefferson LOL....he PARTIED.....

George Washington was the father of our country in MORE ways than one....LOL

Art, i dunno why you accuse me of whining....
i just get sick of people who take themselves toooo seriously..even in war time this leads to fatal errors...nobody has all the answers...

There is a theory called the "marching morons"....
it goes something like this.....
intelligent people recognise that our resources are limited. They utilise birth control because it the "smart" thing to do.....
the morons don't.....

[This message has been edited by glassman (edited October 28, 2004).]


Posts: 36378 | From: USA | Registered: Sep 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Art
Member


Icon 1 posted      Profile for Art     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Glassman: ... there HAS been wealth distribution...but, very little of it occurs by sweat and hard work ...

Art: So, the wealthy didn't work hard for their money? If it were easy we would all be wealthy. Valid thinking makes money, and valid thinking is the hardest thing to accomplish. The rich deserve what they make and the poor don't deserve any more than they make. Liberals steal from the rich and give to the poor, teaching the poor that it is OK to be lazy and irresponsible. So you get increasing amounts of lazy and irresponsible people. DUH!

Glassman: and yes, it is FAIR for people making a lot of money to pay higher taxes....
why?
because without the government they WON'T make all that money....
the government is the tool that allows them to gain this wealth....

Art: More liberal nonsense. Money is made in spite of the government and not because of it. Government policies stiffle capitalism in many instances. Those who can out-think the government can get around its impediments and still get rich. They deserve eveything they earn.

Glassman: ..it is also cheaper for them to pay the taxes than it is for them to ATTEMPT to make this kind of wealth in a feudal system....

Art: Not so. The Mafia operates in a feudal system and this is the best and cheapest way to make money, except when run by the government. We do have a terribly inefficient feudal system - the government is Royalty and robs from the citizenry to support a huge court - the officals and beauracrats. We would all be much better of if the Mafia ran the government instead of the present system - much cheaper and more effective.

Glassman: ...and the more you have, the more you NEED to protect...it doesn't take a genius to figure that out....

Art: The rich would pay their fair share if they paid strictly on the same percentage basis as everyone else. We should all pay 20% of our income toward taxes, regardless of our income.

Glassman: we have a pretty good system...

Art: You are joking, right?

Glassman: the founding fathers would have been labelel LIBERALS by todays standards...LOL

Art: Now I know you are joking.


Glasman: i dunno why you accuse me of whining....

Art: That is all liberals do - whine and complain. Then when they get power they make things worse.

Glassman: There is a theory called the "marching morons"....
it goes something like this.....
intelligent people recognise that our resources are limited. They utilise birth control because it the "smart" thing to do.....
the morons don't.....

Art: Birth control and abortion promote the greatest good for the greatest number - the principle which should guide government. Most abortions kill unborn babies who are not wanted, can not be afforded, and likely to become parasites omn society. Get rid of them.


Posts: 4402 | From: Florida | Registered: Jun 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
glassman
Member


Icon 1 posted      Profile for glassman     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Art, i hate to tell you this, but you are making a pretty good case for replacing democracy entirely.....with a system that is very similar to the Chinese....

i see abortion/birth control as the only significant difference between the liberals and the conservatives today...


you throw out "facts" that are not supportable about fiscal liberalism/conservatism.....they both taxandspend....yes one word...


Posts: 36378 | From: USA | Registered: Sep 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Art
Member


Icon 1 posted      Profile for Art     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Glassman: Art, i hate to tell you this, but you are making a pretty good case for replacing democracy entirely.....with a system that is very similar to the Chinese....

Art: Yes, in 20 years many nations may want to start emulating the Chinese system.

Glassman: i see abortion/birth control as the only significant difference between the liberals and the conservatives today...

Art: No, regulation of businesss is a big issue where liberals want government management of the economy as oppossed to capitalism, and individual versus government responsiblity for a person's well being, where liberals want welfare, nationalized health care and other aspects of cradle to grave socialism. The liberals want communism - government-managed economy and socialistic benefits and care.

Glassman: you throw out "facts" that are not supportable about fiscal liberalism/conservatism.....they both taxandspend....yes one word...

Conservatives tax less, and spend more on defense and less on socialistic programs. Bush is liberal, but less so than Kerry.


Posts: 4402 | From: Florida | Registered: Jun 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
   

Quick Reply
Message:

HTML is enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.

Instant Graemlins
   


Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic   Feature Topic   Move Topic   Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:


Contact Us | Allstocks.com Message Board Home

© 1997 - 2021 Allstocks.com. All rights reserved.

Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classic™ 6.7.2

Share