posted February 19, 2004 16:00            

TW is the big one behind him

and happy to get new ispirations for the

posted February 19, 2004 16:07            

quote:

---

Originally posted by captair:
can you buy QBID through scottrade?? tells me to call the broker??

---

posted February 19, 2004 16:07            

quote:

---

Originally posted by mullocco:
xacly you hitit

TW is the big one behind him

and happy to get new ispirations for the

whole coninent

---

LIKE RIZZO SAID--GAY CHANELS ARE COMMON PLACE OVERSEA'S. US IS BEHIND. THE BACKING FROM HUGH CORPORATIONS IS GOING TO BE BIG. COMMERCIAL AIR TIME WILL BE A BIG SOURCE OF REVENUE. IMHO

posted February 19, 2004 16:18            

dz

/

quote:

---

Originally posted by r.douglas:
I just got an email from a stock site that said "first alert! QBID!"......and I'm like...yeah dicks thanks for the lookout, I've been riding QBID like a donkey for the last 2 weeks!...but good looking out

---

posted February 19, 2004 16:25            

I agree! The controversy,programming and advertising rev. = $$$$ = HIGH pps

dz

/

quote:

---

Originally posted by DiQuiRiesco:
It cannot be overstated how enormous the opportunity is right now to get in at the ground floor of what will soon be a major network in a ground breaking area. At a time when Gay issues are on the front page more than ever this company is in the right place at the right time. We will be right in the middle of one of the biggest political debates in decades. If you doubt controversy will help us make money, ask Emminem, any gangster rapper, Ozzy Osbourne, Madonna, Paris Hilton how they feel about it. In just a month or two as word gets out more you will have Rush Limbaugh, Glen Beck, Bill O'Riley on one side and all of leftist liberal media on the other and us in the middle with a cash register.

---

posted February 19, 2004 16:27            

quote:

---

Originally posted by DiQuiRiesco:
It cannot be overstated how enormous the opportunity is right now to get in at the ground floor of what will soon be a major network in a ground breaking area. At a time when Gay issues are on the front page more than ever this company is in the right place at the right time. We will be right in the middle of one of the biggest political debates in decades. If you doubt controversy will help us make money, ask Emminem, any gangster rapper, Ozzy Osbourne, Madonna, Paris Hilton how they feel about it. In just a month or two as word gets out more you will have Rush Limbaugh, Glen Beck, Bill O'Riley on one side and all of leftist liberal media on the other and us in the middle with a cash register.

---

RIZZO,

YOU FORGOT THE BEST--DENNIS RODMAN--HE TOOK HIS CONTROVERSIAL A-S TO THE BANK!!!

MY MAN DENNIS--A MULTI-MILLION DOLLAR GENIUS WITH A LITTLE REBOUND CAPABILITY. OF COURSE HE LEARNED FROM MADONNA -THE VERY BEST.

CHA CHA CHA CHING-----------

posted February 19, 2004 16:32            

dz

/

quote:

---

Originally posted by CGHitman14:
Well, besides the fact that we're pretty sure QBID has a strong future, any strong reasons why people believe QBID went down today, espicially after more news was released?

---

posted February 19, 2004 16:55            

quote:

---

Originally posted by denzen:
Someone yelled ,FIRE , and lots of folks rushed for the door. MMs got cheap shares and QBID repurchased cheap shares. JMHO

dz

/

---

posted February 19, 2004 16:57            

quote:

---

Originally posted by denzen:
Someone yelled ,FIRE , and lots of folks rushed for the door. MMs got cheap shares and QBID repurchased cheap shares. JMHO

dz

/

---

posted February 19, 2004 16:57            

news followed soon

next steps are planed

the normal doing in beginning anew business

...

trend is my friend

posted February 19, 2004 17:08            

quote:

---

Originally posted by mullocco:

only a conversation

news followed soon

next steps are planed

the normal doing in beginning anew business

...

trend is my friend

wre in the range

---

I LOVE THIS MAN--SHORT SWEET AND TO THE POINT. GO DADDY GO DADDY...LOL

posted February 19, 2004 20:45            

I HAVE BEEN GIVING A LOT OF THOUGHT TO THE REASONING OF WHY SOMEONE WOULD SELL QBID.

#1.THE OBVIOUS REASON MONEY. SOME PEOPLE BOUGHT THE STOCK IN THE .0001 RANGE AND DECIDED TO SELL AND TAKE THEIR PROFITS OR AT LEAST TAKE SOME OF THEIR MONEY OFF THE TABLE.

#2.MAYBE SOME PEOPLE HAVE JUST REALIZED IT IS TOO BIG OF A GAMBLE FOR THEM AND THEY DO NOT WANT TO TIE UP THEIR FUNDS TILL MAY.

#3.SOME PEOPLE SOLD TODAY BECAUSE THEY BOUGHT HIGH AND DECIDED TO CUT THEIR LOSSES AND RUN. LOOKING AT THEIR PORTFOLIO BALANCE SHEET INSTEAD OF POTENTIAL. I KNOW MINE AT 1,200.00 GAIN OR LOSS EVERY MOVE OF .0001 IS NOT LOOKING AS GOOD AS IT DID. NO GUTS.

#4. MAYBE SOME PEOPLE JUST REALIZED THAT IT IS NOT A T.V. NETWORK YET. THERE IS A LOT OF WORK TO BE DONE BEFORE MAY 1, 2004. THEY LOST THEIR VISION.

WHATEVER THE REASON: I AM SYKED. I WAS SERIOUSLY CONSIDERING BUYING MORE SHARES AT .0022. NOW I BOUGHT 3 MIL MORE SHARES AT .0018 AND .0019. I KNOW YOU ALL PROBABLY THINK I AM NUTS. I THINK I AM ALSO. EVERYDAY I JUST SEEM TO SEE THE PENDING POTENTIAL MORE CLEARLY. TO OWN SHARES IN A T.V. NETWORK FOR .0018. AMAZING. WELL--I WILL STOP RAMBLING.

I AM JUST THANKFUL TO LIVE IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND DAILY ENJOY FREE ENTERPRIZE.

posted February 19, 2004 21:01            

quote:

---

Originally posted by fishstix123456:
I think I am going to sell my shares and buy back in closer to May 1st. so far the company just has a vision and I think when we get closer to the deadline, the stock will then start to rise again. for now I don't see it going anywhere.

---

I THINK THAT IS A GOOD PLAN FOR SOME PEOPLE. WE ALL HAVE TO DO WHAT WORKS FOR US FINANCIALLY. GOOD LUCK AND HOPE TO SEE YA BACK HERE IN A COUPLE OF MONTHS. POP IN A SAY HI WEHN YER PASSIN THRU...

posted February 19, 2004 21:12            

quote:

---

Originally posted by Anna:
Come on Di we'll start a "crazy" club. I bought more today as well. In for a penny in for pound! LOL I think the potential is unbelievable here. Gamble? Absolutely! If it weren't it wouldn't be any fun!

I have visions of Vegas!

---

I AM GOING TO TRY REALLY HARD TO GET A HOLD OF FRANK ON THE TELEPHONE. I KNOW HE IS PROBABLY TO BUSY TO TALK TO ME BUT I AM NOT GOING TO QUIT TRYING. I HAVE LEFT SEVERAL MESSAGES. I AM AFRAID IF I CONTINUE I MAY BE ARRESTED FOR STALKING. LOL I AM SURE LOTS OF PEOPLE ARE TRYING TO CALL HIM. AS HIS NEWS RELEASE STATED ONE ITEM OF AGENDA IS TO SET UP A HOT LINE FOR QUESTIONS TO BE ANSWERED. IT IS PROBABLY INSANE THERE.

YEAH ANNA--WE ARE NUTS. I DON'T REALLY THINK MUCH ABOUT GETTING RICH--I THINK I REALLY ENJOY THE GAME. THE WHOLE STOCK MARKET GAME IS SO EXCITING TO ME.

posted February 19, 2004 21:17            

quote:

---

Originally posted by tradealldayyy:
Yo - I'm in! Tomorrow I buy more QDOG! Maybe I'm crazy too, but we'll either help each other fasten our straight jackets or be millionairres together.....

---

T,

GOOD POINT--WE WILL EITHER HAVE ADJOINING ROOMS AT THE TOP FLOOR OF CEASARS PALACE OR ADJOINING ROOMS ON THE TOP FLOOR OF THE LOCAL HOSPITAL WHICH IS USUALLY THE LUNNY BIN WARD. LOL

I LOVE THIS THREAD. I LAUGH MYSELF SILLY.

------------------
DIANA

posted February 19, 2004 21:39            

Trini

quote:

---

Originally posted by DiQuiRiesco:
It cannot be overstated how enormous the opportunity is right now to get in at the ground floor of what will soon be a major network in a ground breaking area. At a time when Gay issues are on the front page more than ever this company is in the right place at the right time. We will be right in the middle of one of the biggest political debates in decades. If you doubt controversy will help us make money, ask Emminem, any gangster rapper, Ozzy Osbourne, Madonna, Paris Hilton how they feel about it. In just a month or two as word gets out more you will have Rush Limbaugh, Glen Beck, Bill O'Riley on one side and all of leftist liberal media on the other and us in the middle with a cash register.

---

posted February 19, 2004 22:02            

quote:

---

Originally posted by fishstix123456:
I think I am going to sell my shares and buy back in closer to May 1st. so far the company just has a vision and I think when we get closer to the deadline, the stock will then start to rise again. for now I don't see it going anywhere.

---

There is a good chance this will be a good day trading stock at least before May, especially with the buyback going on. The swings should like the one today. CTKH also seem to have a nice pattern..I have not day traded that one...have only 600K & the spread is a little tight - between 0.0040 & 0.0050 (Gain versus risk is probably not worth it).

I will not touch half of my stocks in qbid which is 1m & daytrade the other half...I have already made some money so it is around 770k right now.

Lets see how the daytrading comes out. Actually I am trying to sell some other ones I own so I can day trade QBID a little more...& yes Diana I think you are crazy but very courageous at the same time for having so many shares...I think we all know this will at least get near 0.05 cents (hoping)....You will almost be done for life I guess....

posted February 19, 2004 22:07            

QUEERLY BELOVED
Faulty forms to void
same-sex marriages?
State says San Francisco altered licenses to delete 'bride,' 'groom'

SAN FRANCISCO (AP) - After sanctioning more than 2,700 gay marriages in the past week, the city said Thursday it is suing the state of California, challenging its ban on same-sex marriages on constitutional grounds.

And this from Chicago, the next front

Mayor Daley said Wednesday he would have "no problem" with County Clerk David Orr issuing marriage licenses to gay couples -- and Orr said he's open to a San Francisco-style protest if a consensus can be built.

posted February 19, 2004 22:11            

quote:

---

Originally posted by fastrunner:
Ahhhh...retirement coming. I can hire my child a full time nanny, tutor, driver and I can just sit back and relax. Oh, not to forget a gourmet chef. To be gay and funded by Qbid...

Trini

---

posted February 19, 2004 22:21            

The Case Against Same-Sex Marriage
By Tim Leslie

Anyone not living in a cave has noticed the intensifying attack on traditional marriage. In Vermont, Canada, and Massachusetts—and now California, with the signing of a de facto gay marriage bill—the war drums against traditional matrimony are beating with ever-growing intensity......... http://www.crisismagazine.com/january2004/leslie.htm

Arrest the mayor!

Am I missing something? California has a law forbidding same-sex marriage. The mayor of San Francisco violates that law. Why is a court case even needed? Shouldn't they have been able to just arrest him? http://www.worldnetdaily.com/letters.asp

The winds of change on Beacon Hill

By Ellen Goodman, 2/15/2004

I TOOK THE SUBWAY to the culture wars this week. The sidewalk in front of the Massachusetts State House -- stop No. 1 on the tourist Freedom Trail -- was filled with combatants for and against gay marriage.
ADVERTISEMENT

posted February 19, 2004 22:31            

quote:

---

Originally posted by DiQuiRiesco:
Homofabulous Go QBID

---

For The Complete Story Go To: www.s5000.com or www.WhatTheHuck.com

According to http://www.worldnetdaily.com/

http://www.cnn.com/CNN/Programs/wolf.blitzer.reports
http://www.dearmary.com/mary/index.html

A Christian legal group wants California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger to arrest the mayor of San Francisco for issuing nearly 2,000 marriage licenses to homosexual couples in defiance of state law.

The American Family Association Center for Law and Policy called Mayor Gavin Newsom's decision to oversee the nation's first officially sanctioned same-sex weddings Thursday "an arrogant stunt" proving "the radical homosexual movement will trample the rights of all who stand in their way."

The AFA's law center wrote Schwarzenegger and Attorney General Bill Lockyer Friday insisting the mayor not only violated civil law, but criminal law as well.

Schwarzenegger and other state officials have remained silent on the issue.

The letter cites California's penal code Section 115, which "prohibits the knowing procurement of any false or forged instrument to be filed or recorded in any public office."

The penalty for the felony, the letter notes, is up to three years in prison. The AFA says this means three years for each false certificate issued.

With the clerk's office kept open over the weekend, more than 1,700 same-sex couples have been issued licenses since Thursday, when the city became the site of the first officially sanctioned "gay marriage" in American history.

Opponents of same-sex marriage are confident they will convince San Francisco Superior Court Judge Ronald Quidachay to issue a temporary restraining order after a hearing this morning.

The motion filed on behalf of the pro-family lobby group Campaign for California Families by the public-interest firms Lively & Ackerman and Liberty Counsel presents an "irrefutable argument" that Newsom and Clerk Nancy Alfaro had no authority to redefine marriage in direct conflict with California law, asserted the group's president and general counsel Mathew Staver.

"The rule of law will be restored in California," Staver said. "The mayor and the clerk have no right to act as tyrants, ruling San Francisco as their personal dictatorship."

The Arizona-based Alliance Defense Fund sought an emergency hearing Friday afternoon but was rejected for failing to give defendants the 24-hours notice required by law.

A hearing in ADF's lawsuit also will be held today.

Newsom argues homosexuals should be able to marry based on the California Constitution's guarantee of equal protection under the law. The 36-year-old mayor, who began his term Jan. 8, insists he merely is fulfilling his duty.

"I'm not interested as a mayor in moving forward with a separate but unequal process for people to engage in marriages," Newsom said Friday on ABC's "Good Morning America." "The people of this city and certainly around the state are feeling that separate but unequal doesn't make sense."

But the Alliance Defense Fund – representing state Sen. William Knight, author of a successful state ballot-measure that limited marriage to a man and a woman – argues the San Francisco County Clerk has no authority under the state's constitution to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples.

"This isn't civil disobedience on the mayor's part; its sheer unfettered anarchy and complete disdain for the rule of law," ADF chief counsel Benjamin Bull said. "No mayor, not even the mayor of San Francisco, has the authority to defy the laws of the state in which they reside."

The statutes under the family code specify marriage is reserved to a man and a woman, and Bull points out no court has declared that section to be unconstitutional.

"Officials charged with solemnizing marriages must enforce those statutes on constitutional grounds when issuing marriage licenses, regardless of what [Mayor] Newsom orders them to do," said Bull.

Skaultmath asks: Should Mayor Newsom be arrested? Why or why not?

posted February 19, 2004 22:34            

According to The Washington Post, the President, as a way to "jumpstart his campaign," is about to endorse a Constitutional amendment, sponsored by Representative Marylin Musgrave (R-CO) that would ban marriage rights for same-sex couples and could forever invalidate civil unions or other legal protections for same-sex couples and their children. He is bending to pressure from anti-gay extremists who oppose every effort to secure equality for GLBT Americans. He -- and all of our leaders -- need to hear from all of us who support GLBT civil rights and marriage equality, and who oppose amending our nation's most sacred document - the U.S. Constitution. We must be as relentless as the anti-gay forces.

So, starting today, we need your help in deluging Congress and the White House with calls, faxes, and e-mails. Here's how:

1. Fax your members of Congress. Tell them to oppose the Musgrave anti-marriage amendment and any attempt to amend the Constitution to discriminate against GLBT Americans. Click here or copy and paste this URL into your browser: http://www.hrcactioncenter.org/campaign/bush_fma

2. Call the White House at 202-456-1111. Tell the President that using GLBT Americans and the U.S. Constitution for political gain is shameful. Click here to let us know you called. http://www.hrcactioncenter.org/campaign/bush_fma_phone

3. Please pass this on to everyone you know -- friends, family, colleagues. We trying to get 50,000 calls to the President during the next 48 hours. Click here to forward to all your friends. http://www.hrcactioncenter.org/campaign/bush_fma_phone/forward

Thank you for your efforts today, and for your patience as we keep you informed and involved via e-mail over the next few days. We're glad we can count on you to continue this fight of our lives.

Sincerely,

Cheryl Jacques
President
Human Rights Campaign

P.S. Are you a member of HRC yet? If not, click here to join today and help us stop this amendment. Visit https://secure.ga3.org/03/fma?W04LGAPG1. If you are already a member, thank you - you can still help by making a contribution today. Click here or visit https://secure.ga3.org/03/fma_0211?source=W04LGAAG1

February 14 is National Freedom to Marry Day and rallies are being held across the country. We encourage you to attend these rallies in your community - visit these websites: http://www.freedomtomarry.org/events.asp?year=2004&month=2&day=14 http://www.dontamend.com/rallies/index.html

Share your story with us about talking to straight family members about marriage. What has worked well? What hasn't? Click here or paste this URL into your browser: http://www.hrc.org/Template.cfm?template=/Surveys/SurveyDisplay.cfm&SurveyID=51

You control what kind of e-mail you want to receive from HRC. If you would like to unsubscribe from a specific Human Rights Campaign list, or update your account settings, you can visit your Subscription Management Page. Click here to remove yourself from all Human Rights Campaign lists.

If you are a current member of HRC, thank you. To help HRC fund the Action Center and support gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender equality, please join HRC or renew your membership today. Visit our membership page at http://www.hrc.org/joinus.

Thank you for taking action and for supporting HRC.

This e-mail communication is provided to users of HRC's Online Action Center to keep you informed of breaking news, legislative developments, and when you should take action. To comment on this service please e-mail us at field@hrc.org.

(c) 2003 The Human Rights Campaign.
All rights reserved. View our privacy policy Human Rights Campaign
1640 Rhode Island Ave., N.W., Washington, D.C. 20036-3278
Phone: 202/628-4160 TTY: 202/216-1572 Fax: 202/347-5323
E-mail: field@hrc.org

posted February 19, 2004 22:51            

quote:

---

Originally posted by DiQuiRiesco:
CHING

---

RIZZO,

ALL I CAN SAY IS "GREAT MINDS THINK ALIKE".
WE WERE BOTH SURFING THE GAY/LESBIAN NEWS FORUM AT THE SAME TIME. LOL

I AM SERIOUS WHEN I SAY. SURF THE WEB. SEE FOR YOURSELF THE POTENTIAL HERE. OVER 3000 COUPLES MARRIED THIS WEEK. PEOPLE FLYING IN FROM ALL OVER THE WORLD TO GET MARRIED IN SF. BILL MAYER WITH HIS USUAL LIBERAL STAND. COMEDY AT ITS BEST. BUSH WILL HAVE TO STATE A PLATFORM SOON OR BE STONED. I VOTE FOR THE LATTER. ^&*%^&& LOL

A T.V. NETWORK THAT WOULD BE A UNIVERSAL FORUM FOR GAY RIGHTS. WHEW. THAT IS DEEP.
I HOPE FRANK CAN PULL IT OFF THIS TIME. 4 YEARS HAS MADE A HUGH DIFFERENCE IN THE GAY/LESBIAN COMMUNITY. MAKES ME WANT TO GO HELP HIM. STICK ME ON THE INFORMATION HOTLINE!!!! LOL

posted February 19, 2004 23:27            

quote:

---

Originally posted by rags2riches:
hi guys, I'm new here and have a question.
If qbid is buying back shares why didn't they buy them before the price went up?
I have 2 million shares buy the way.
Thanks,
Rags2Riches

---

posted February 19, 2004 23:37            

I am in this with only about $500, so I as the rest of you would like to see it sky rocket. It's just so hard to imagine it going too high because of the excessive volume. Can anyone else think of many situations where a company had the abiltiy to buy back this many shares to allow the stock price to rise to a reasonable amount?