This is topic FHAL...RUNNING...news maybe later! Look at the volume in forum Hot Stocks Free for All ! at Allstocks.com's Bulletin Board.


To visit this topic, use this URL:
http://www.allstocks.com/stockmessageboard/ubb/ultimatebb.php/ubb/get_topic/f/2/t/012513.html

---

Posted by stocktrader22 on :
 
Way over average volume in first 1 of trading....CEOTA contract coming with Fronthaul valued at 1.5billion....this thing is flying...just wait till the news hits!
 

---

Posted by Claydough on :
 
Merger news out today!
 

---

Posted by stocktrader22 on :
 
Wow, 834 million in Assets for the company they are merging with.
 

---

Posted by Braindamaged on :
 
I'm in at .155 Thanks for the tip
 

---

Posted by maxdog on :
 
Just looking at this, do you think it is to late in the game to jump aboard?
 

---

Posted by P Rowds on :
 
7.21 a share?!
 

---

Posted by stocktrader22 on :
 
Yes $7.21 a share with both companies merged. Means FHAL could easily see $1.00
 

---

Posted by greg60 on :
 
FHAL up 118% today with 13 million volume
 

---

Posted by 66inxs on :
 
yeppers FHAL rocked today. if it gaps and/or stays even around 10 i might jump in. i am afraid of pinks that jump up 100% in a day. something like a roman candle then poof it slowly ainks back into subpennyland. pr did look good though.
 

---

Posted by Doniboy on :
 
I'm in at a loss right now, so I hope it bounces. The 8-K seems legit, so I can't find a reason for a drop from here.
 

---

Posted by 66inxs on :
 
i don't aee any reason either, but we all know the pinks. you have to stay right on top of them
 

---

Posted by Braindamaged on :
 
Thanks for the early posts on this one. Did buy in at .155 but being a working stiff I was not able to watch it climb all the way. Sold at .26 for a good profit.

Thanks for your DD Stocktrader22 I hope I can help you out sometime with a pick of mine.
 

---

Posted by Blue Marlin' on :
 
in at .028
 

---

Posted by Claydough on :
 
You mean .28 right B Marlin? Lets hope this thing rocks tomorrow again after the usual dip following a 100% day.
 

---

Posted by 6digits on :
 
Heres some tree info.

http://books.google.com/books?vid=LCCNagr09000837&id=fsniLcEwiAsC&pg=PA258&lpg=P A258&ots=QbH86J8zKF&dq=is+submerged+timber+preserved
 

---

Posted by Peaser on :
 
I'm guessing Monday on the early dip could be a nice entry point here.
 

---

Posted by 10of13 on :
 
Peaser what are you seeing the dip at? .13?
 

---

Posted by T e x on :
 

quote:

---

Originally posted by 10of13:
Peaser what are you seeing the dip at? .13?

---

surely not!
 

---

Posted by Peaser on :
 
Sorry Tex. I was guessing .13 - .14 entry.

Then a nice recovery back above .20-.25 by Tuesday or Wednesday IMO.

Prolly Sell it Wed on a High, then possibe re-entry on Friday at close, or Monday morning.

Just a thought. GLTA.
 

---

Posted by T e x on :
 
Pease...am kidding...

when I posted about the gap to be filled (perhaps on the other thread) at 12-15...why, you'd a thought I fell out of well, judging from the reaction...
 

---

Posted by Peaser on :
 
lol, didn't see it.

Thought you mighta been holding this one.
 

---

Posted by T e x on :
 
nope, like it, though...as plays go...

you can see my take, starting with Wally's question to me...as I say, other thread, I suppose...
 

---

Posted by Peaser on :
 
I'll check it.

I like this as a play Monday, swing it for a coupla days, but I might not play it due to other one's that currently look promising to me, we'll see. Gotta make up my mind by Monday.
 

---

Posted by 10of13 on :
 
Thanks Peaser...

I had a buy in earlier...before the "big dip...but it never took...I wasn't real sure that it would go back down that low...

Tex...the "chart junk" is helping a little...kinda funny how everyone has different ways of reading them...so now I need to see which is easiest for me...thanks...
 

---

Posted by ruskin_muskin on :
 
Tex.. what is Chart Junk???? have no clue about that term!!!
 

---

Posted by T e x on :
 
"Tex...the "chart junk" is helping a little...kinda funny how everyone has different ways of reading them...so now I need to see which is easiest for me...thanks..."

here's the thang about the thang...as graphs, they are visual aids...only. No different really from "visual aids" shown in school...

you may respond to a certain visual aid (indicator) much differently than another. The "trick" is to find those that make sense to you... the reason I place in quotes? It's really no trick, at all: backtesting.

see if this helps. 1) pick a coupla good trades you made

2) use stockcharts, opening at least two different windows (this assumes you are "free user," not a subscriber; subscribers get more indicators per chart

3) look at [1], with different indicators

4) note (not "notice" -- make notes ) which indicators "make sense" in light of your good judgment

Repeat with a coupla "bad trades"
****
btw, backfilling a gap has little or nothing to do with charts per se, beyond being able to recognize them. Can do the same thing with stockwatch.com, simple math in a table array
 

---

Posted by ruskin_muskin on :
 
OK just to add to Tex.. get familiar with terms such as cup and handle, golden cross, so on and so forth.. would help you a tonne to make quick money.. heck if you knew the term last week, ssvg would have made you 50-80% money
 

---

Posted by T e x on :
 
ruskin?

when I need sumpin outta you? I'll squeeze your neck...
 

---

Posted by ruskin_muskin on :
 

quote:

---

Originally posted by T e x:
ruskin?

when I need sumpin outta you? I'll squeeze your neck...

---

lollllllllllllllll
 

---

Posted by Purl Gurl on :
 
"when I need sumpin outta you? I'll squeeze your neck..."

* grins *
 

---

Posted by Peaser on :
 
Like takin' a needle to a hemeroid.
 

---

Posted by wallymac on :
 
TEX,

Yesterday when you talked about filling the gap I was thinking about the one from the morning, I forgot about the first one. Do you think going to .14 today was close enough or will they bring it back down on Monday to the 12.5-13 area and let it go from there.

Just your best guesstimate.

Thanks
Wally
 

---

Posted by T e x on :
 
techincally? 13.5 yet to be filled...

as far I've seen...

however, that 13.5 was Simon's "precise point" call... my general call was filling a gap at 12-15...

me personally? I'd rather see it see touch 132 or even high 12s...

point being...it almost had to close in this range in order to really move forward...

will it now go north?

who knows...but we're certainly close to eliminating one variable
 

---

Posted by 10of13 on :
 

quote:

---

Originally posted by T e x:
10 of Detail...what you want, babeee...? only yesterday you were perplexed about gaps being filled ????

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by RagingBull:
ok soooo whats your point

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by Jmoove:
Repo, the $15 val of shares is based on the 8K merger agreement. Calls to the CEO have been confirmed as a trading price of $15 will be established by/on 15 days after the date of closing, July 28-Aug 1. I was very speculative of this but, im almost a believer now. The 8K says it all.

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by Peaser:
Hope ya got in for the ride.

Hopefully someone on micro's PM's me what all the hoopla is about.

I heard something of $15/share but I have no idea what it means.

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by 10of13:
Peaser...is it possible to figure out some sort of "support" when it goes up so fast like this? if it is possible...what do you see the support at?

I'd rather not see that support...i'd rather just keep the upward climb!!! LOL!

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by 10of13:
Peaser...is it possible to figure out some sort of "support" when it goes up so fast like this? if it is possible...what do you see the support at?

I'd rather not see that support...i'd rather just keep the upward climb!!! LOL!

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by Free Muney:
when does the conversion to cvsu stock happen? will there be a reverse split to average up to current cvsu stock price?

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by Peaser:
From pinksheet to Nasdaq, wow.

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by Peaser:
Around 1pm EST looks to be the end of tis penant IMO.

---

Well, okay. lol. How does now sound for the end of the penant.

j/k 1pm it is IMO.
 

---

Posted by 10of13 on :
 
1-317-213-7700 ben stanley

there's the number if anyone wants to call and see what the deal is...
Tex...you're good at that...LOL..
 

---

Posted by 10of13 on :
 
now sounds better...!!!
Did you grab more?
 

---

Posted by Peaser on :
 
Needs to hold above 1.10 after 1pm IMO.

Got plenty now 10.

After lunch breakout anyone?
 

---

Posted by 10of13 on :
 
Yeah...let's break out...again....!!!
And keep goin'...I just want $2...and I will be more than happy! (too greedy?)
 

---

Posted by 10of13 on :
 
Latest phone call...

cassity
Member


Member Rated:
posted July 19, 2006 12:55 PM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
O.K just talked to Ben: I asked him about the $15 pps, he stated the way it will work is, they are going to release PR's for the 10k and the share buyback program. Yes they are still buying shares at this time and want the entire float. Sounds like share buyback is very similar to share buyout(JMO). He said it IS a good idea to request hard copies of your shares for share buyback, so they know who the shareholders are! I asked him if he had any estimates on the current float and he said to look at the share sizes, getting very low(his words)! Press releases will be very soon in his exact words. I asked if the pps was at $5 before ticker change and it goes to $15 after ticker change do we get the $10 difference. He said that it would be explained in the buyback PR. Sorry if this is so choppy, but I'm STOKED! Do not buy on my phone calls or DD.(disclaimer)Call him yourself.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
.
 

---

Posted by Newbie7 on :
 
Jump on boat!
Although a bit too late because my funds had to clear..
Is Rufus going to be on radio again?
 

---

Posted by 10of13 on :
 
I have no idea...
 

---

Posted by Peaser on :
 
Get ready, Get set......................
 

---

Posted by 10of13 on :
 
Wave the damn flag and shoot the gun....LET's GOOOO!!!!
 

---

Posted by Peaser on :
 
Great job 10.
 

---

Posted by Peaser on :
 
Dippin'?
 

---

Posted by 10of13 on :
 
umm...yeah...next pennant? I am going to say .90 is support...(and yes i am pullin' out of my A$$)
 

---

Posted by Newbie7 on :
 
Why are people selling at an 8k that has a book value of over $7?

Do you think it's the people who bought on Monday is trying to press down to price that they can buy tomorrow?
 

---

Posted by 10of13 on :
 
Newbie..as Tex said...momo...is what made it move...and now they got out...they probably didn't even know the story of the merger..jumped in made bank...got out...and now we go back down and continue to "wait..."
 

---

Posted by 66inxs on :
 
yep this turned from a rocket into a supertanker. maybe it will rebound ???
 

---

Posted by Peaser on :
 
Bounce at .86
 

---

Posted by Peaser on :
 
That was an evil, just evil shake there.
 

---

Posted by 10of13 on :
 
LOL...I am going to cry...at least these are all" free shares" but that profit thing is killin' me....whaaa whaaa!!!

OH well...still hangin' for a few days...BLASTARDS!...LOL
 

---

Posted by 10of13 on :
 

quote:

---

Originally posted by Peaser:
That was an evil, just evil shake there.

---

and what the one from 1.55 was nothin'? LOL
 

---

Posted by ruskin_muskin on :
 
lol.. tough call.. glad i am not in it.. otherwise i would have pooped buying at 1.5 and now price at 0.88.
 

---

Posted by Newbie7 on :
 
This is not like NDOL.
The numbers of the 8k should push it back up sooner or later..
 

---

Posted by Peaser on :
 
I think so too Newbie.
 

---

Posted by Peaser on :
 
MM's just stole a bunch of shares IMO.
 

---

Posted by 10of13 on :
 
I'm turning this off...I said i was holding for a few days...and I am...if i watch i will sell...I'll check in later..GLTA!

Peaser...hang in there...
 

---

Posted by Newbie7 on :
 
Time to BUY!
 

---

Posted by Peaser on :
 
Get back through 1.10 and we're off again IMO.

1 step at a time though. First resistance at 1.05 here.
 

---

Posted by Newbie7 on :
 
Looks like a battle between the MMs.
But the key is the 8k
 

---

Posted by Peaser on :
 
Hmmm, MM's maybe trying to cover short positions?

Who knows?

Hovering around 1.00
 

---

Posted by Peaser on :
 
Bounce at .90.
 

---

Posted by Newbie7 on :
 
Are they trying to protect the $1 territory?
 

---

Posted by Peaser on :
 
Needs to get back above .95 - .98 area.
 

---

Posted by Peaser on :
 

quote:

---

Originally posted by Newbie7:
Are they trying to protect the $1 territory?

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by Peaser:

quote:

---

Originally posted by Newbie7:
Are they trying to protect the $1 territory?

---

I think that the MM's are panicking, possibly tring to cover short positions.

Could be a short squeeze in the mix.

---

this may sound crazy....but what if it's simply folks buying and selling?
 

---

Posted by Peaser on :
 
It's possible, but I doubt it.

The float is so small, and the MM's are the only one's that can legally naked short.

The only problem with Naked shorting in their case now is, well, now they know that they have to cover due to the SEC form 8K filed the other day.
 

---

Posted by Peaser on :
 
1.02 x 1.03
 

---

Posted by Peaser on :
 
1.04 x 1.05

1.05 going.
 

---

Posted by Peaser on :
 
1.155 x 1.155
 

---

Posted by T e x on :
 
lol, lottsa action...
 

---

Posted by Peaser on :
 
1.06 x 1.08

Might bounce at 1.06
 

---

Posted by Peaser on :
 
Bounced 1.06

1.12 x 1.13
 

---

Posted by Peaser on :
 
1.08 x 1.09

Very spastic movements now.
 

---

Posted by Peaser on :
 
Might be getting ready to make a run at 1.15 again

1.10 stacking a little on the bid.
 

---

Posted by Peaser on :
 
1.12's stacking

1.12 x 1.13
 

---

Posted by Peaser on :
 
1.15 resistance say buh-bye!

Might be going out with a bang today it appears.

1.18 x 1.19

My guess is that we close near/at the HOD today.
(1.80ish maybe, just a guess, that is if this mornings run is duplicated in the final two hours of trading today)

The dips in between the new peaks are very similar to this morning.
 

---

Posted by Hannibull on :
 
did I just see the ask go to 0.79 ?
 

---

Posted by Peaser on :
 
1.24 x 1.25
 

---

Posted by Peaser on :
 
Yup Hannibal on the ask, then a 1.04. Wierd.

Dusty will have fun reading back through this thread when he gets home later. lol

The retracements now are a little less drastic than this mornings.
 

---

Posted by Peaser on :
 
1.10 x 1.11
 

---

Posted by Peaser on :
 
1.13 x 1.14
 

---

Posted by GreenDay on :
 
Hey Peaser - wutcha doin over here? The FHAL thread is really active over at under .10 board
 

---

Posted by 10of13 on :
 
Hey Peaser...
The CEO said that he would be buying back shares on the bid...look at ARCA and the large amounts...on the bid...Could be Rufus(CEO)? Trying to watch for him...my guess would be when you see those large orders...on the bid it's them...and then it goes up...maybe not...
 

---

Posted by Peaser on :
 
1.25 next resistance.
 

---

Posted by Peaser on :
 

quote:

---

Originally posted by GreenDay:
Hey Peaser - wutcha doin over here? The FHAL thread is really active over at under .10 board

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by Peaser:
Possible "loophole" for 10 of confusion:

Who currently owns CVSU(The Company) shares and what is the actual value of these shares?

Who will gain the most from this merger?

Throw somethin' at me if I missed sumpum in the 8K.

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by Peaser:
Possible "loophole" for 10 of confusion:

Who currently owns CVSU(The Company) shares and what is the actual value of these shares?

Who will gain the most from this merger?

Throw somethin' at me if I missed sumpum in the 8K.

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by Newbie7:
But is this the reason that Rufus would want to buybsck as much shares as possible to push the price as close to $15 as possible?

That way he won't have to pay CSVU the premium for their shares.

---

Right..buy back...moves the PPS up..then do a r/s...and bingo...awfully close to the $15.00...ARGH!!!!
 

---

Posted by 10of13 on :
 
Peaser..not quite sure...
 

---

Posted by Livinonklendathu on :
 
10, you stealing my material?
 

---

Posted by Peaser on :
 
I edited my previous post.
 

---

Posted by portman on :
 
I am coming into this thread late. Who is buyer and who is seller in the merger?

Once I get back from the pool and the kids are in bed the merger lawyer and I will look it all over.
 

---

Posted by Livinonklendathu on :
 
From the under a dime thread, Peaser, Dust see if you agree or not if you have a minute:

Ok, I think I finally got this figured out - this is all C/P from the 8K:

THIS MERGER AGREEMENT (this "Agreement" ), dated as of the 8th day of July, 2006, is by and among:

FRONTHAUL GROUP INC., a Delaware corporation (the "Buyer" ); and

Conversion Solutions, Inc., a Delaware corporation and a holding company (the "Company" ).

FHAL and CVSU intend to file an S-4 registration statement / prospectus in connection with the proposed Merger for the registration of the CVSU share pursuant to the Merger agreement.


2.2 COMPANY SHARES.

(a) Each share of the Company's capital stock (the " Company Shares " ), par value $0.001 per share, issued and outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time shall, by virtue of the Merger and without any action on the part of the holders thereof, be canceled and converted at the Effective Time into the right to receive the Merger Consideration (as defined below) in accordance with this ARTICLE II.

(b) Each Company Share , by virtue of the Merger and without any action on the part of the holder thereof, shall at the Effective Time no longer be outstanding, shall be canceled and retired and shall cease to exist, and each holder of certificates representing any such Company Shares shall thereafter cease to have any rights with respect to such shares, except for the right to receive the Merger Consideration.

(c) Notwithstanding anything contained in this Section 2.2 to the contrary, any Company Shares held in the treasury of the Company immediately prior to the Effective Time shall be canceled without any conversion thereof, and no payment shall be made with respect thereto.

(d) From and after the Effective Time of the Merger, there shall be no transfers on the stock transfer books of the Surviving Holding Company of Company Shares that were outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time. If, after the Effective Time, certificates representing Company Shares are presented to the Surviving Holding Company, they shall be canceled, and exchanged for the Merger Consideration as provided for herein.

2.3 MERGER CONSIDERATION.

(a) Subject to Sections 2.2, 2.4, 2.5, 2.6 and 2.8 , at the Effective Time, the holders of Company Shares outstanding at the Effective Time, other than the Buyer and its Affiliates, shall be entitled to receive, and the Buyer shall issue and deliver, for each Company Share held by such Person: (i) 1.0 share of the Buyer's stock or

(b) No fractional shares of the Buyer's Stock shall be issued or delivered in connection with the Merger. Instead, the number of shares of the Buyer's Stock to which a holder of the Company Shares is entitled to receive pursuant to this Article II shall be rounded to the nearest whole share (with 0.5 share rounded up to the nearest whole share).

(c) In the event the Buyer changes the number of shares of the Buyer's Stock issued and outstanding prior to the Effective Time as a result of a stock split, stock dividend or other distribution payable in Buyer's Stock or securities convertible into Buyer's Stock or similar recapitalization with respect to such stock or effects a reclassification, combination or other change with respect to Buyer's Stock (each a "Stock Adjustment" ) and the record date therefore (in the case of a stock dividend) or the effective date thereof (in the case of a stock split or similar recapitalization, reclassification or combination for which a record date is not established) shall be prior to the Effective Time.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


It sounds as though the old CVSU shares are the only ones being offered per the S4 and if so entitled to the options.
 

---

Posted by 10of13 on :
 

quote:

---

Originally posted by Livinonklendathu:
10, you stealing my material?

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by Buford Baucom:
Hi Mr. Peaser,

It is very nice to meet you once again.

BB

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by 10of13:
Peaser, Tex..Dust...anyone...

OK...this statement is "confusing"

The share conversion upon the 10KSB filing (Audited Financial) will be a 1 for 1 ration. Each shareholder of CVSU will receive one share of FHAL

I am in FHAL...not CVSU...ONLY CVSU share holders will reicieve one share of FHAL for each of the CVSU that they hold? I get nothin'?

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by T e x:

quote:

---

Originally posted by 10of13:
Peaser, Tex..Dust...anyone...

OK...this statement is "confusing"

The share conversion upon the 10KSB filing (Audited Financial) will be a 1 for 1 ration. Each shareholder of CVSU will receive one share of FHAL

I am in FHAL...not CVSU...ONLY CVSU share holders will reicieve one share of FHAL for each of the CVSU that they hold? I get nothin'?

---

Looking at it now--so far? I *still* don't see what the "deal" is...

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by Peaser:
Here ya go 10:

http://www.otcbb.com/aboutOTCBB/secrules.stm

10B-17 I think.

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by Livinonklendathu:
10, it's ten calendar days, yes?

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by portman:
Whoever wrote 2.3(c) in the 8-k needs shot.

---

LMAO!
 

---

Posted by Newbie7 on :
 
And it seems that doing a R/S wouldn't really benefit them since the pps will more less drop as much as Rufus splits, which is not what Rufus would want.
It makes much more sense to buyback as much shares as possible to put a squeeze on supply.

$4 at 65 mil is still much better than paying $11 difference at 45 mil.
 

---

Posted by Buford Baucom on :
 
Hi,

This sounds like a real good stock to buy tomorrow. What would be a good price?

BB
 

---

Posted by mnvestor on :
 
10, I could not have said it better, well explained and that is exactly how I see it, once again in today PR using cvsu.ob is obviously including both the old CVSU and FHAL shareholders. Once again very well written
 

---

Posted by cassity on :
 
Hey Tex, I'm not sure if your the Moderator of either of these FHAL boards, but can we somehow move all the info and posts from the under .10 board to this one? Thanks
 

---

Posted by portman on :
 
Ok, this will take us all night to go over and we can't do that.

There are a couple of things we see.

First look in the definitions for the declaration of the average share price. FHAL is used over 20 days as defined there.

We may have missed it but we see no definition of a closing date other than sometime after audited financials and determined by parties sometime after.

If they alter the shares of FHAL it looks like the "company" then could chose to walk with no penalty. In fact we see little if any penalties in there.

If they buy all the float...you shareholders can't file a class action against the merger.
 

---

Posted by 10of13 on :
 
cassity...I don't think they move threads...you could just put a link...

Aren't you the one that Rufus told..over the phone that the merger was complete? or the purchase of..something like that..?
 

---

Posted by portman on :
 

quote:

---

Originally posted by Newbie7:
And it seems that doing a R/S wouldn't really benefit them since the pps will more less drop as much as Rufus splits, which is not what Rufus would want.
It makes much more sense to buyback as much shares as possible to put a squeeze on supply.

$4 at 65 mil is still much better than paying $11 difference at 45 mil.

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by Buford Baucom:
Hi,

This sounds like a real good stock to buy tomorrow. What would be a good price?

BB

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by mnvestor:
"1.) If the Market Closing Price on the Completion date exceeds $15.00 (Fifteen) USD the Surviving Holdings Corporation (OTC Bulletin Board: CVSU - News) may option to maintain that days Market Closing Price.

2.) To pay each shareholder that options out an amount in cash equal to $15.00 minus the Actual Average Closing Price.

3.) Set the Average Closing Price at $15.00 and pays no additional consideration to any shareholders"

Directly from PR, notice how before the 3 options it says CVSU.ob, this tells me it is post merger (old CVSU + FHAL) that options apply towards..as far as r/s question, directly from Rufus himself "no r/s"

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by 10of13:
cassity...I don't think they move threads...you could just put a link...

Aren't you the one that Rufus told..over the phone that the merger was complete? or the purchase of..something like that..?

---

Yes, I was refering to one of your questions. You asked me to ask him how things with the merger are going. As soon as I asked he said,"The merger is a done deal, all that's left to do is file our 10k..." He made it crystal clear it was complete and 15 days from the filing of the 8k we would change to a new ticker(CVSU). Just what he told me.
 

---

Posted by Purl Gurl on :
 
Why are none of you asking this question,

"Why would CVSU give away money?"

Purl Gurl
 

---

Posted by cassity on :
 
Today when I called Ben I specifically asked him if this applied to FHAL, he said yes. Otherwise I would have sold everything I have.
 

---

Posted by cassity on :
 

quote:

---

Originally posted by Purl Gurl:
Why are none of you asking this question,

"Why would CVSU give away money?"

Purl Gurl

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by cassity:
Today when I called Ben I specifically asked him if this applied to FHAL, he said yes. Otherwise I would have sold everything I have.

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by Livinonklendathu:

quote:

---

Originally posted by cassity:
Today when I called Ben I specifically asked him if this applied to FHAL, he said yes. Otherwise I would have sold everything I have.

---

And he knows that. We are trying to verify this deal so people don't get screwed. Something is not adding up and we are going to find it.

---

I hope he does, because I don't want to get screwed! I'm just posting what he said.

 

---

Posted by Peaser on :
 

quote:

---

Originally posted by Purl Gurl:
You readers believe you can buy some shares
of FHAL today for 1.20 per share and after
this so called merger, your shares will be
worth 15.00 per share?

* rolls her eyes *

Purl Gurl

---

Nope, just playing where the momentum lays.
 

---

Posted by Livinonklendathu on :
 
You readers believe you can buy some shares
of FHAL today for 1.20 per share and after
this so called merger, your shares will be
worth 15.00 per share?

* rolls her eyes *

Purl Gurl


Yes I do - if they R/S it before hand.
 

---

Posted by T e x on :
 

quote:

---

Originally posted by cassity:

quote:

---

Originally posted by Purl Gurl:
Why are none of you asking this question,

"Why would CVSU give away money?"

Purl Gurl

---

If the new ticker opens at $15 a share, you still have to trade it, so it wouldn't be giving away money, or am I all screwed up?

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by Purl Gurl:
Why are none of you asking this question,

"Why would CVSU give away money?"

Purl Gurl

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by Danny_K:

quote:

---

Originally posted by fryyguyy:
Here is one of CVSU's joint ventures and they have government contracts with an estimated worth of $600 million with the F-22 and F-35. Is this included in the $800 million worth of the company(CVSU)? It is AISS on CVSU homepage.

---

Just a side comment on this: the fact they have a contract for the F22 explains thier location perfectly, Dobins ARB is 10 min from thier office, and this is where they actually BUILD the F22. This would lead me to belive they have actually personel working in Kennesaw apposed to a "virtural office" as a previous poster said. But then again, you never know. Just expressing my thoughts.

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by Peaser:
I didn't see anything regarding going to the Nasdaq? FHAL already trade on the Nasdaq OTC Bulletin boards.

Did I miss something?

---

I can't remember if it was on that "radio show" or where...but that was my understanding...

so it could be me Peaser...(which would be the likely thing... )
 

---

Posted by Peaser on :
 
I haven't done tons of DD on this yet.

Still working on it. Just wonder if there was a PR or something. I saw something mentioned in the 8K about Nasdaq OTC Bulletin board, but maybe I was looking at something other than why folks think it's gonna go to the Nasdaq.
 

---

Posted by 10of13 on :
 
Really...this thing is giving me a headache...LOL
trying to nit pick it to flippin death...I agree all should be "skeptic"...but for me...I am in this for the next couple of days...to make some bank...and I am out...(I hope)I don't think that I would make it through this merger crap..LOL...
 

---

Posted by Purl Gurl on :
 
Only reason FHAL is all pumped up into a
speculation bubble, which will burst and
cause a crash, is there are millions of
naive gullible traders out there being
worked over by shrewd seasoned traders.

Purl Gurl
 

---

Posted by Livinonklendathu on :
 

quote:

---

Originally posted by 10of13:
Really...this thing is giving me a headache...LOL
trying to nit pick it to flippin death...I agree all should be "skeptic"...but for me...I am in this for the next couple of days...to make some bank...and I am out...(I hope)I don't think that I would make it through this merger crap..LOL...

---

Same here 10, but this is driving me nuts cause' I know it's wrong but I can't nail it down.
 

---

Posted by Purl Gurl on :
 
Tex writes,

*why* would it open at any given price?

I *still* don't get where folks are getting the idea that the CEO or "the company" can set prices on the market...

___

CSVU does not trade at all.

CVSU -- Conversion Solutions, Inc.
Com ($0.0001)
Primary Venue:

No trade information available for this security.


Purl Gurl
 

---

Posted by T e x on :
 
10 of Sissies writes:

"headache" wah.... "trying to nit pick"

lol, who's picking nits? I simply don't see any thing, any *where* that indicates current FHAL shareholders get anything beyond market price...
 

---

Posted by glassman on :
 
reverse merger... i played SPEA last year
 

---

Posted by 10of13 on :
 

quote:

---

Originally posted by Purl Gurl:
Only reason FHAL is all pumped up into a
speculation bubble, which will burst and
cause a crash, is there are millions of
naive gullible traders out there being
worked over by shrewd seasoned traders.

Purl Gurl

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by Purl Gurl:
Tex writes,

*why* would it open at any given price?

I *still* don't get where folks are getting the idea that the CEO or "the company" can set prices on the market...

___

CSVU does not trade at all.

CVSU -- Conversion Solutions, Inc.
Com ($0.0001)
Primary Venue:

No trade information available for this security.


Purl Gurl

---

quote:

---

If the new ticker opens at $15 a share, you still have to trade it, so it wouldn't be giving away money, or am I all screwed up?

---

was responding to that...

many folks very confused...

seem to believe CEO or company can somehow "set the price" of shares on open market...
 

---

Posted by Livinonklendathu on :
 
It looks to me like they only need to file the received CVSU shares on the S4. Anybody see it different?

http://64.233.161.104/search?q=cache:q4uwNSCBcqMJ:www.sec.gov/about/forms/form4d ata.pdf+sec+form+4&hl=en&gl=us&ct=clnk&cd=1&ie=UTF-8
 

---

Posted by 10of13 on :
 
Yes..I am a sissie...what about it?

If this were to go the way "they" claim..then i see the $...I posted it earlier in this thread...

and i agree with you Livinon...but I can't find it...perhaps we will not know until the actual merger...but I will be out by then...although still following so i will find out the answers...
 

---

Posted by glassman on :
 
the people who own CVSU believe their company is worth 15$ per share.....

they want 15$ that is what they are being promised....
 

---

Posted by T e x on :
 

quote:

---

Originally posted by 10of13:

quote:

---

Originally posted by Purl Gurl:
Only reason FHAL is all pumped up into a
speculation bubble, which will burst and
cause a crash, is there are millions of
naive gullible traders out there being
worked over by shrewd seasoned traders.

Purl Gurl

---

I disagree...I don't see allot of "pumpers" at least not on this board...and I think that this has risen just as any other stock does..."hype and Rumor" but this hype and rumor was started by an 8K filing..and that is where I see quite a difference from other "un-called for runs"...this isn't my version of a "typical P&D"

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by 10of13:
Livon...
the way that is sounds...although this was my concern also...but...

First the merger...FHAL will "join" CVSU and in that merger CVSU share holders will get 1 of FHAL's stock for each of their curent CVSU..and then all stock will be "turned" into CVSU shares...and the "company" and new stock will be called...and traded under CVSU...(old CSVU share holders now have 2 stocks and the old FHAL share holders only have 1 stock of the "new" CSVU)

if on the first closing day of the new stock (we are all now share holders of CSVU...FHAL no longer is) the stock does not close at 15..."we" CSVU shareholders get the difference...

---

Here ya go Tex...but I am not going back through the 8k to point it out...this is what I came up with after trying to figure it out...
 

---

Posted by Purl Gurl on :
 
Tex drawls,

"seem to believe CEO or company can somehow
"set the price" of shares on open market..."

Oh, Tex, (and I know your real name now) many
CEO do this all the time! Parkin said NDOL
is worth 2.17 per share. Lyamec said shares
are worth 2.25 per share.

Must be true, yes?

CEO love to give away money.

Such a bargin. Buy FHAL for 1.20 today,
sell FHAL for 15.00 tomorrow!

**

That ain't workin that's the way you do it
Money for nothin' and chicks for free
Now that ain't workin' that's the way you do it
Lemme tell ya them guys ain't dumb

- Dire Straights

Purl Gurl
 

---

Posted by glassman on :
 
it isn't that complicated...
i really don't know why the issues are coming up...
the only thing in question is whether the 15$ price is going to be agreeable to the market...
 

---

Posted by Sean on :
 
LOL Purl. Is there a stock that you do like?
 

---

Posted by T e x on :
 

quote:

---

Originally posted by glassman:
the people who own CVSU believe their company is worth 15$ per share.....

they want 15$ that is what they are being promised....

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by glassman:
it isn't that complicated...
i really don't know why the issues are coming up...
the only thing in question is whether the 15$ price is going to be agreeable to the market...

---

lol, true...

current FHAL shareholders "guaranteed" nothing; no magic day when a check is issued to cover the difference between what "FHAL" trades at and what current CVSU owners get in addition for going ahead with the merger....
 

---

Posted by Livinonklendathu on :
 
Per the 15c2-11 for CVSU dated 11-3-5

Shares:

Control persons:

Rufus Paul Harris 7,630,000
Ben Stanley 7,630,000
 

---

Posted by T e x on :
 
OT:
"and I know your real name now"

so you know how to add my e-mail, then
 

---

Posted by TaxBack04 on :
 
You guys are kidding right?

I found FHAL this past weekend, but it did not take long for me to find ***'s write up about them. Today's upsurge is not hype or pump, it is the 1.5 billion dollar exclusive contract, and the buy rating from two analyst. Try reading this before you dump, then when you do dump tel me when so I know when to buy up the loose shares.

http://www.***.com/pdf/FHAL.pdf
 

---

Posted by Purl Gurl on :
 
This is a truly wonderful deal.

Today, I buy a million shares of FHAL for
a dollar a share.

Later, Rufus and Ben will give me fourteen-million
dollars to make up the difference in share value!

Now that is a real deal!

Purl Gurl
 

---

Posted by Purl Gurl on :
 
"so you know how to add my e-mail, then"

* frowns *

No, not yet. I am working on this!

Purl Gurl
 

---

Posted by TaxBack04 on :
 
sorry forgot about the censor...

http: // w w w . m n 1 . c o m /pdf/FHAL.pdf
 

---

Posted by T e x on :
 

quote:

---

Originally posted by glassman:
FHAL was pretty tightly held according to their filings...

not too many shares "floating"....

there are some prefered's that might be a pain in dabutt..

but it looks like a fairly clean shell that was just cleaned up...

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by glassman:
agreed! Further, I believe--but can not document this....let's say, instead...I wouldn't at all be surprised to learn that the overwhelming majority of CVSU shares are the new officers of FHAL, eh?

the reverse merger stipulates that the mangement of CVSU will replace FHALs mangement...
this how reverse mergers work...

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by glassman:
yep..... it's privately held...
that's why you don't get an active quote on them...
the real question is how much of their 850 mikllion dollars in assets are really assets isn't it?

850 million dollars is what they say they have....

ONVERSION SOLUTIONS, INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
Statement of Cash Flows
January 1, 2006 - March 31, 2006

OPERATING ACTIVITIES

Net Income


($ 284,019)


Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities

INVESTING ACTIVITIES:




($ 284,019)



Stables


($277,000)


UCC Security Notes


($ 310,138,000)


Interest Receivable


(33,125,000)


Long-Term Investment in Bonds


($ 500,000,000)


Net Cash Provided by Investing Activities




($ 843,540,000)




FINANCING ACTIVITIES

Capitol Stock




$ 2,329


Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income


$ 803,430,836


Note Payable




$ 4,400,000


Long-Term Note




$ 36,000,000






$ 843,833,165




divide that by the number of shares and you get you 15$...

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by TaxBack04:
sorry forgot about the censor...

http: // w w w . m n 1 . c o m /pdf/FHAL.pdf

---

did anyone take a look at TaxBack's link?
 

---

Posted by glassman on :
 
how the hell am i supposed to read that? it's in German for crying out loud

if the market says 15$ then i'll believe it...

and? just incase you missed it?

the lawsuit was dismissed without prejudice...

After a further hearing before the court on July 22, 2004, the court ordered that the preliminary injunction be dissolved to the extent that it prohibited Paul Harris, Benjamin Stanley and John Walsh from holding themselves out as directors of the Company. The court also ordered the Company to hold a special stockholders election to determine who should serve as the Company's directors.

According to the special meeting held on December 9, 2004, we announced the removal of Paul Harris, Ben Stanley and John Walsh as Directors of the Company effective December 16, 2004.

After the removal of Paul Harris, Benjamin Stanley and John Walsh from our board of directors and due to the fact that they have no assets to attach, we decided it would be in the best interest of the Company to dismiss the case without prejudice.

as i read it? the lawsuit may not have had merit...
 

---

Posted by Livinonklendathu on :
 

quote:

---

Originally posted by 10of13:

quote:

---

Originally posted by TaxBack04:
sorry forgot about the censor...

http: // w w w . m n 1 . c o m /pdf/FHAL.pdf

---

did anyone take a look at TaxBack's link?

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by 10of13:
OK..Nice find by Livinon...but everything was dismissed...

Privately owned CSVU..yes...and those financials..are "unaudited"...which is one of the things that were suppose to be waiting on for this so called merger...

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by T e x:

quote:

---

Originally posted by 10of13:
OK..Nice find by Livinon...but everything was dismissed...

Privately owned CSVU..yes...and those financials..are "unaudited"...which is one of the things that were suppose to be waiting on for this so called merger...

---

10?

lol, it was dismissed w/o prejudice after the court ordered "Rufus" (then going by Paul... instead of Rufus) et al to quit posing as officers of the company...

---

WRONG!!!!!

they were voted off after the fact....

read it again...
According to the special meeting held on December 9, 2004, we announced the removal of Paul Harris, Ben Stanley and John Walsh as Directors of the Company effective December 16, 2004.


lawsuit without merit??? likely...
 

---

Posted by T e x on :
 
"as i read it? the lawsuit may not have had merit..."

lol, very similar to BCIT...

ya, dismissed...AFTER court orders 'em to QUIT posing
 

---

Posted by 10of13 on :
 
LMAO off glass..I can't decide if you are serious or jokin'...

As for the $15 a share...I think that Rufus and Stanley get all the shares...by buying them back on the open market..and so they don't pay anyone...and then they can turn around and sell as many as they want on the open market once it trades in the new symbol...that's my story and I am stickin' to it!
 

---

Posted by glassman on :
 
why would the board vote 'em off if they were "posing"

i agree about the "assets"
 

---

Posted by glassman on :
 

quote:

---

Originally posted by 10of13:
LMAO off glass..I can't decide if you are serious or jokin'...

As for the $15 a share...I think that Rufus and Stanley get all the shares...by buying them back on the open market..and so they don't pay anyone...and then they can turn around and sell as many as they want on the open market once it trades in the new symbol...that's my story and I am stickin' to it!

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by glassman:
removal after the meeting?

why did they need a meeting?

why was the case dismissed without prejudice?

this is very common at all levels of biz....

---

good lord, you're hard-headed...

the court ordered the meeting, according to that link...

I'm sure the company felt the same way: Do WHAT? OK, Your Honor, we'll meet and agree the guys you ordered to quit posing are in fact not on our board

( ...again, look at the mess re BCIT... been following? OT--did you see my note MLNK today? )
 

---

Posted by mnvestor on :
 

quote:

---

Originally posted by glassman:

quote:

---

Originally posted by 10of13:
LMAO off glass..I can't decide if you are serious or jokin'...

As for the $15 a share...I think that Rufus and Stanley get all the shares...by buying them back on the open market..and so they don't pay anyone...and then they can turn around and sell as many as they want on the open market once it trades in the new symbol...that's my story and I am stickin' to it!

---

jokin' about what? it is possible to disagree without name-calling and

this is in play .... somebody is buying them shares...

it IS a pink, and i am not recomending buying or selling...

i have seen plenty of reverse mergers actually work....... will this one? i dunno... that's why it's not at 15$ already...

---

pssst, it is not a pink, FYI
 

---

Posted by glassman on :
 

FORM 8-K
CURRENT REPORT

Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Date of Report: May 7, 2004

ITEM 1. Change of Control.

On April 4, 2004, the board of directors of Broadband Wireless International Corporation (OTCBB-BBAN) (hereinafter the “company”) passed a resolution to cancel the agreement entered into on December 29, 2002, by and between Enhancement Holdings, LLC, Stanley Holdings Business Trust (referred to herein as EHLLC) and Entertainment Direct, TV, Inc./Broadband Wireless International Corporation. Such cancellation is based on the fact that pursuant to the terms of the agreement EHLLC was to place on the books of the company a 100 Million USD Insurance Guarantee Bond. The bond was to be used to facilitate a $57 million credit line for the company. Under the agreement, the company agreed to render three (3) seats on its board to EHLLC. The three members appointed to BBAN’s board pursuant to the agreement were Paul Harris, Benjamin Stanley and John Walsh. Harris and Stanley are directors of EHLLC and Harris is the CEO of EHLCC.

EHLLC failed to perform its obligations under the agreement. Furthermore, the company has been provided with evidence that the bond is underwritten by insolvent companies and has been assigned to other parties, one of whom recently received a multi-million dollar judgment against EHLLC and its officers/directors in an action alleging fraud and other improprieties. Additionally, the company has reason to believe that EHLLC and its officers/directors have committed other infractions which are under investigation by the company’s counsel and others. The company intends to pursue all appropriate legal remedies against EHLLC, Paul Harris, Benjamin Stanley and John Walsh on behalf of itself and its shareholders.
 

---

Posted by glassman on :
 
NO, i'm not anymore hard-headed that anybody else here...

i'm not pumping this stock just demonstrating how to do DD...
i've never believed 15$ will come and i never said it would...
 

---

Posted by T e x on :
 
"jokin' about what? it is possible to disagree without name-calling and"

*hint: this is the way it's sposed to work...having Glass take an interest is ... well, intriguing is an understatment *
 

---

Posted by T e x on :
 

quote:

---

Originally posted by Jo4321:
Did anyone play SDFE when it was about to be taken over by NNRF?

I'm trying to see if there are similarities here. On that one, the PPS went up over 300% a few days prior to this PR.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Stafford Closes Nucon Acquisition


VANCOUVER, British Columbia, May 8, 2006 (PRIMEZONE) -- Stafford Energy, Inc. ("Stafford") (Pink Sheets:SFDE) is pleased to announce that it has closed the Share Exchange Agreement with Nucon, Inc. ("Nucon"), a Nevada company.

As of this date, Mr. Robert Stepan, Mr. Todd Sinclair and Mr. Sven Smeds have resigned as Directors of Stafford, and Mr. J. Holt Smith, Esq. has been appointed to the Board of Directors. Mr. Richard Connors will remain on the Board for the transition period until a newly elected Nucon Board of Directors assume their duties.

Stafford will begin the transition period whereby it will complete all necessary filings with the State of Nevada and the NASD to affect a name, cusip number and symbol change to reflect the new name, NUCON-RF, Inc. In addition, under the terms of the share exchange agreement, Stafford will effect a 275-to-1 share consolidation on or about May 22nd, 2006, after which, Stafford will acquire 22,500,000 common shares of Nucon representing 100% of Nucon's outstanding common stock in exchange for 22,500,000 shares of Stafford's common stock. In addition, there will be an issuance of 3,000,000 post consolidated debt settlement shares. On completion of the transition period, Stafford will have a total of 25,858,647 common shares issued and outstanding.

Nucon has established alliances and contracts with Russian Federal government agencies responsible for the domestic and export nuclear industries, including a contract as project partner with Atomstroyexport, www.atomstroyexport.ru/index-e.htm to provide materials, technologies and services for the Chernobyl Shelter Implementation Plan in Ukraine. Nucon has the capability to provide product, technological and engineering support for environmental and radioactive waste challenges including, compliance, shielding, transport and storage requirements for a broad range of radioactive and toxic wastes. For more information on the company please visit its web site www.nucon-rf.com

Safe Harbor Statement

Statements in this press release that are not historical facts are forward-looking statements, including statements regarding announcements of financial results, business potentiality and other prospective presentations by Stafford. Such statements reflect management's current views, are based on certain assumptions and involve risks and uncertainties. Actual results, events, or performance may differ materially from the above forward-looking statements due to a number of important factors, and will be dependent upon a variety of factors, including, but not limited to, our ability to obtain additional financing that will allow us to continue our current and future operations and whether demand for our products in domestic and international markets will continue to expand. Stafford undertakes no obligation to publicly update these forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances that occur after the date hereof or to reflect any change in Stafford's expectations with regard to these forward-looking statements or the occurrence of unanticipated events.

CONTACT: Stafford Energy, Inc.Richard Connors
(604) 943-4671

--------------------


Before the aquisition took place the pps started going down again. Then there was a reverse split.

But Rufus said No Reverse split, right?

Jo

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by T e x:
"jokin' about what? it is possible to disagree without name-calling and"

*hint: this is the way it's sposed to work...having Glass take an interest is ... well, intriguing is an understatment *

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by glassman:
NO, i'm not anymore hard-headed that anybody else here...

i'm not pumping this stock just demonstrating how to do DD...
i've never believed 15$ will come and i never said it would...

---

Lol..."hard-headed" you're not any *less,* either lol, we're both hard-headed...

OK, to recap, if I may, sir?

1) we agree "assets" are shall we say, "iffy" (CVSU)

2) no "guarantee" of $15 for current FHAL shareholders, either in SEC filing or in PR?

fair assessment?
 

---

Posted by glassman on :
 
no "guarantee" of $15 for current FHAL shareholders, either in SEC filing or in PR?

fair assessment?

FHAL holders get what they can sell it for....
no guarantee.....
i thought i said that first... CVSU owners get 15$
 

---

Posted by glassman on :
 
Tex? i never found anyhting about who all holds CVSU ...
and i'm no position to properly analyse their assets.... i just don't know...
i think you are getting ahead of the game here with some of your claims....

shell purchases/ revers mergers are almost impossible to fully analyse...
yes there are red flags, but no way am i saying the PPS won't go much higher....
 

---

Posted by 10of13 on :
 
Glass...and all...if you look at all of the filings for FHAL and the dates...and the names...looks like this was "signed" back on June 8th...and not filed until July 12th...I am wondering how long Rufas and his buddies have been buying back the shares? CVSU "owns" FHAL...and they can really merge at any time...from what I am reading..

does this make a difference? Not sure..but I found it interesting that the "old" CEO signed The filed 8K (from July) in June...

Is Rufas..."allowed" to buy AND sell shares as he chooses?
 

---

Posted by T e x on :
 

quote:

---

Originally posted by glassman:
Tex? i never found anyhting about who all CVSU is...
and i'm no position to properly analyse theer assets.... i just don't know...
i think you are getting ahead of the game here with some of your claims....

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by Free Muney:
why are all pr's stupid and ambigious? is good straightforward english that challenging? does anyone have the slightest clue as to the play before the conversion? Hold? Sell? Stab Voodoo dolls? The more i look into this play, the more confused i get.
Any insight(like a laymans intrepretation of the pr) would be wonderful for a newbie like myself who tripped and fell into a gold mine...

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by Free Muney:
why are all pr's stupid and ambigious? is good straightforward english that challenging? does anyone have the slightest clue as to the play before the conversion? Hold? Sell? Stab Voodoo dolls? The more i look into this play, the more confused i get.
Any insight(like a laymans intrepretation of the pr) would be wonderful for a newbie like myself who tripped and fell into a gold mine...

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by Puddy:
Possible morning selloff coming.

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by 66inxs:
dusty i'm not buying either. i was going to but i'm dizzy too. maybe the mm's are walking the horse ! i have no clue on this one today - maybe pumping into a dilution could be going on too ? if someone finds out please post.

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by Purl Gurl:
"Purl gurl has alot of knowledge but she was wrong on ghlt...."

You are full of crap, Bubba.

Purl Gurl

---

LOL..Purl..are you saying that you don't have alot of knowledge? LOL
 

---

Posted by Newbie7 on :
 
Today might be different than the past couple days.
There are more funds to flip.
And Rufus will be on live interview at IHUB tonight.
 

---

Posted by Purl Gurl on :
 
Ten writes,

"LOL..Purl..are you saying that you don't have alot
of knowledge?"

Ha! Ha! I will get you for that, Ten of Nonsense!

Purl Gurl
 

---

Posted by 10of13 on :
 
Mwwwuuuaaahhhh
 

---

Posted by Purl Gurl on :
 
That does it, Ten of Silliness!

I am coming over with a big bucket of
piranha to let loose in your pond!

That will keep your boys walking on water!

Purl Gurl
 

---

Posted by portman on :
 
Mmmmmmmm piranha with a nice white wine and butter and garlic sauce.

And you can catch 'em just by dangling your toe in the water too!
 

---

Posted by Jo4321 on :
 
So have you changed your opinion on FHAL, Purl?

Jo
 

---

Posted by ruskin_muskin on :
 

quote:

---

Originally posted by 10of13:
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Purl Gurl:
[qb] "Purl gurl has alot of knowledge but she was wrong on ghlt...."

You are full of crap, Bubba.

Purl Gurl

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by Purl Gurl:
That does it, Ten of Silliness!

I am coming over with a big bucket of
piranha to let loose in your pond!

That will keep your boys walking on water!

Purl Gurl

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by Purl Gurl:

You are outright lying, as usual.
Purl Gurl

---

people are adviced to go and read the "need stock opinions" thread for clarifications. i had been picked on for pointing out the P&D scenario of DVPC there too. however, facts were posted there. same with TCLL. I had shown pumps of tcll, and when it was dumped all the way from 0.32, plenty of hard working american families lost their money by that pump . losing 32% of their money with a pump and dump scam.. i hope people are not buying pump scam of almi at 2.17. lol.. come tomorrow, next week, and next month, i shall confidently say how many people would lose their money if they bought almi at 2.17.
 

---

Posted by vg on :
 
Purl told people to buy ALMI at the 1.60 - 1.80 range now if people bought late it is their fault. She also told people to sell around 2.15 and she also told people that she sold at 2.26. Lets leave ALMI out of this if you look at the past 2 years, ALMI is not the kind of stock you daytrade.
 

---

Posted by Purl Gurl on :
 
Ten of Crazy writes,

"and take the kids?"

You bump your head this morning? You are nuts!

We just spent the last twenty some odd years
raising a girl with an attitude a thousand
times worse than mine.

NO MORE KIDS.

Purl Gurl
 

---

Posted by Purl Gurl on :
 
Do not bother, VG, most of us Old Timers
know him for what he is. Others will learn
soon enough he cannot be trusted for a second.

Ignore the boy, he is not worth your time.

ALMI is doing better than I expected! I truly
did not think these current prices would last
this long. Appears confidence is good.

http://www.allstocks.com/stockmessageboard/ubb/ultimatebb.php/ubb/get_topic/f/2/ t/001894/p/1.html

Purl Gurl
 

---

Posted by Peaser on :
 
My guess is that this goes to 1.04 for the low of day, closes the gap and bounces from there.
 

---

Posted by ruskin_muskin on :
 
pump it at 1.6.. dump it at 2.2.. and then wait for the next pump.. and unfortunately hardworking newbies dont even know why they are a company with pathetic financials, which has 50% decreased revenues y/y, and 1500% y/y..
 

---

Posted by 10of13 on :
 

quote:

---

Originally posted by Purl Gurl:
Ten of Crazy writes,

"and take the kids?"

You bump your head this morning? You are nuts!

We just spent the last twenty some odd years
raising a girl with an attitude a thousand
times worse than mine.

NO MORE KIDS.

Purl Gurl

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by glassman:
arca is acting wierd....

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by glassman:
they just swtiched again straight across== ask to the bid...

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by 10of13:
Peaser...Do we need to fill the gap from this morning?

---

Apperently not. This never filled the gap the other day at .135 that we thought it would.

I wish it woulda, cause my buy was in there at .13 the other day.
 

---

Posted by Newbie7 on :
 
I got out to with some profits.
Didn't come in early enough to make the money you guys made because my funds weren't ready.
Let's see how tonight's interview go first...
 

---

Posted by GreenDay on :
 
I swear! Rufus just took my call on his cell phone that is listed on their website 678-255-7650.

I asked "I own FHAL today. Am I guaranteed $15 a share on the 7/28 or 8/1 merger date on all my shares that I hold today. He said "yes hon - you sure are" I said "that sounds way to good to be true, how can you do that?" He said the regualtions of reorganizations allow companies to stop the market and reset the price per share at reorganization."
 

---

Posted by Dustoff 1 on :
 
nite arca even on bid ask
 

---

Posted by 66inxs on :
 
over 9 mil traded. the bulls are fighting the profit takers today. may drop fast again. am sure watching this one closely !
 

---

Posted by Purl Gurl on :
 
"He said the regualtions of reorganizations allow
companies to stop the market and reset the price
per share at reorganization."

* rolls her eyes again *

Reverse Split, a death knell for a stock.

Purl Gurl
 

---

Posted by GreenDay on :
 
Purl - please explain a little more - thks!
 

---

Posted by Peaser on :
 
Well, Rufas sure is a genius it appears at first glance. He even said that they won't do a revers split.

Hope he's honest.
 

---

Posted by 10of13 on :
 

quote:

---

Originally posted by Peaser:
ARCA is sucking up what he can on the bid, that's for sure.

---

Rufas claimed that "he is buying back shares at the bid"
 

---

Posted by glassman on :
 
PG it all comes down to the value of the assets they are holding...

why are you bringing RS to the table?
 

---

Posted by Peaser on :
 
1.34 x 1.35
 

---

Posted by 66inxs on :
 
r/s usually takes a penny to subpennyland like a rock in a lake - definitely death knell. don't hold these pennies more than absolutely necessary to make a profit, cash them, and shift some of your profits to a real investment like real estate, t-bills, etc. as suggested.
 

---

Posted by Peaser on :
 
Dem CVSU bonds er sum expensiav bonds.
 

---

Posted by GreenDay on :
 
I am just wondering why Purl thinks what Rufus said to me is an indication of R/S when he already said that there would be NO R/S.
 

---

Posted by Purl Gurl on :
 
"...stop the market and reset the price...."

The only way this can be accomplished
is a reverse split or a forward split.

A forward split will NOT increase share price.

Assets, HA! FHAL is bankrupt.

Purl Gurl
 

---

Posted by Peaser on :
 
Wait and see, some of us are still be-daffled over this.
 

---

Posted by Peaser on :
 

quote:

---

Originally posted by GreenDay:
I swear! Rufus just took my call on his cell phone that is listed on their website 678-255-7650.

I asked "I own FHAL today. Am I guaranteed $15 a share on the 7/28 or 8/1 merger date on all my shares that I hold today. He said "yes hon - you sure are" I said "that sounds way to good to be true, how can you do that?" He said the regualtions of reorganizations allow companies to stop the market and reset the price per share at reorganization."

---

So coming out of bankruptcy(re-organizing) by way of a reverse merger could allow them to adjust the trading price is what he is saying IMO, if I am reading it clearly.
 

---

Posted by Purl Gurl on :
 
"...stop the market and reset the price...."

Jeesh, boys, stop and think for a minute.

Dang!

What he suggest is simply impossible.

A "reset of the price" can only be accomplished
through a split, no other way.

This returns to what Tex writes about a CEO or
other company executive, CANNOT set share price.

Purl Gurl
 

---

Posted by 66inxs on :
 
peaser maybe 10of13 is right about rufus trying to bring his worthless CVSU back into play again. his gain - our loss ! this has been a nice money maker the past few days but has gotten to risky right now imho. if they do a r/s it is worthless. time will tell !
 

---

Posted by Peaser on :
 
Wish we had someone with a PHD in Re-orginazation laws here.
 

---

Posted by Dustoff 1 on :
 

quote:

---

Originally posted by glassman:
PG it all comes down to the value of the assets they are holding...

why are you bringing RS to the table?

---

quote:

---

Why does this sound "rediculas"? Stanley and Rufas..."own" CVSU...they are buying up shares of FHAL to bring the PPS up...(supply and demand)
They will "own" so many shares of the new stock...I can't even imagine...even if they pay the difference to share holders...they will be able to retire...just as Rufas stated in his "chat" session..he can retire in 2-3 months...

My guess is...that on that second trading day of the new stock...they dump ALL those shares that they have bought up the past few weeks...talk about mega bucks!

---

quote:

---

In one common scam, penny-stock promoters may pump up shell stock values by touting a merger with a private company, then dump their own shares before the merged company's low value becomes obvious.

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by Dustoff 1:
The product: Salvaged logs from rivers and tributaries of the Amazon..

Hardwoods that have great value...
A mechanism for recovery and transport..

This alone is a very good high stakes venture, as ventures go...Don't have to have a rock in Science to understand the buisness..It is not High tech..

Looking for other companies doing or proposing same, which are already established and far less in contrariety may be wise..

I get a sense of sophistication of intent...Intent to sell stock...Raising funds by CVSU?
The buying up of the float, by the company?
The "Audit"?
Filing with the SEC, is no expedition into Graffiti..There are penalties...
Pumping machines in High gear accross the net..
We also have to take into consideration the gambling habits of many differant groups..
Hong Kong loves to gamble..As do far to many Americans...We have to admit to ourselves that this stock can be intoxicating when running..

A high with Victory! A low with defeat...
The Human elements run high in this stock, making discipline difficult at best..

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by Purl Gurl:
"(P.S. Green Day is one of "us" purl)"

No problem. I treat everyone equally.
I yell at all of you!

Purl Gurl

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by glassman:
nope

---

I did a little research on the wood down in the Amazon, and it ain't cheap stuff. geez.

Now, how do they get it out o da submerged mud?
 

---

Posted by showme$ on :
 
egil? anybody...?
 

---

Posted by Jo4321 on :
 
This is the FHAL thread.
 

---

Posted by 10of13 on :
 
Purl Gurl writes:
She needs to be introduced to me! No sexism on
my part; I yell at everyone equally.

Hey Purl...This is GreenDay...consider your selves "introduced"...

(That's all I got when Tex introduced us...so that's all I am givin.. )
 

---

Posted by Newbie7 on :
 
End of Day Bodyslam...
 

---

Posted by 66inxs on :
 
pg wrote:

We are blessed. Four, no five of us women counting
Granny. We now have these hundred or so boys
completely outnumbered; they are surrounded!

my 6 y.o. calls that "girl-trapped" !
 

---

Posted by 10of13 on :
 
Peaser..the wood info is in the other thread..(under .10) It actually can be worth alot of lute...plus they get some type of "credit" for removing it...
 

---

Posted by Purl Gurl on :
 
Greenday, I hope you will stay with us here
at Allstocks, despite my presence.

I am thinking there are enough women here, now,
we can redecorate. I am thinking Ralph Lauren
pastels, say Belmont Pink or Aruba Pink. This
would be beautiful for the walls around here.

Maybe French Pink for the windows.

http://rlhome.polo.com/rlhome/products/paint/default.asp

Click on "Paint Palette"

Purl Gurl Pink
 

---

Posted by Peaser on :
 
Well, I'm out for now. It fell below the 1.30 support line I had on the chart, so I sold it.
 

---

Posted by T e x on :
 

quote:

---

Originally posted by fhalyesss:
hi Purl i am new to this, can u explain this??
I posted in on the other board earlier and nobody could explain it.

Thanks in advance

Hi guys, this is my first ever post. I have owned shares in this since .15 last week. I am based in the UK and trade through TD WaterhouseUK. Today i recieved a corporate action sent to my account as follows:

Stock: FRONTHAUL GRP INC
Action Type: Merger
Description: Fronthaul Group Inc and Conversion Solutions Inc announced that they signed a definitive agreement pursuant to which Conversion Solutions Inc agreed to acquire Fronthaul Group for cash.

The transaction is structured as a merger.
Under the terms of the merger, Fronthaul Group shareholders will receive USD7.21 in cash in exchange for each share held.

The effective date has not yet been announced.

?????????????????

Does this mean my shares will be worth this over night? It sounds like they will give me the money but are taking my shares?

Any thoghts on this? i only ever get these e-mails when i get a confirmed dividend.

---

quote:

---

Fronthaul Group Inc and Conversion Solutions Inc announced that they signed a definitive agreement pursuant to which Conversion Solutions Inc agreed to acquire Fronthaul Group for cash.

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by GreenDay:
Nice to meet you Purl!

Peaser - are u out cause we are redecorating or because the price is falling?

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by GreenDay:
Nice to meet you Purl!

Peaser - are u out cause we are redecorating or because the price is falling?

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by 10of13:
Tex..I think that he took that from the message that his "broker" sent him...

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by Purl Gurl:

Trained mud sharks.

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by Peaser:
10 of wonderwomen, that gap might just close up here.

---

quote:

---

Loss Leader buying /selling stopping near the
close of market. Points directly to pump & dump.

I have some articles around here on this.

Purl Gurl

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by Peaser:
10 of wonderwomen, that gap might just close up here.

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by 10of13:

quote:

---

Originally posted by Peaser:
10 of wonderwomen, that gap might just close up here.

---

Yep...looks filled...and I grabbed some...I'll see tomorrow if I should be shot...unless i just shot myself!

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by Jo4321:
I wonder if Harris will actually go through with the interview. That should be interesting.

Jo

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by T e x:

quote:

---

Originally posted by Peaser:
10 of wonderwomen, that gap might just close up here.

---

what needs to fill?

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by T e x:

quote:

---

Originally posted by Jo4321:
I wonder if Harris will actually go through with the interview. That should be interesting.

Jo

---

when/where the interview, please?

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by Hannibull:

quote:

---

Originally posted by T e x:

quote:

---

Originally posted by Jo4321:
I wonder if Harris will actually go through with the interview. That should be interesting.

Jo

---

when/where the interview, please?

---

they said on Ihub that the interview won't happen because they only have room for 200 listeners (not sure if THAT is his argument, but there you have it, no interview).
I sold my shares at 1.24, thought about getting back in around 1.11 but I decided to wait

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by Peaser:

quote:

---

Originally posted by T e x:

quote:

---

Originally posted by Peaser:
10 of wonderwomen, that gap might just close up here.

---

what needs to fill?

---

It filled. There was a gap up today at the open to about 1.40 from about 1.05ish from yesterdays close.

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by T e x:

quote:

---

Originally posted by Hannibull:

quote:

---

Originally posted by T e x:

quote:

---

Originally posted by Jo4321:
I wonder if Harris will actually go through with the interview. That should be interesting.

Jo

---

when/where the interview, please?

---

they said on Ihub that the interview won't happen because they only have room for 200 listeners (not sure if THAT is his argument, but there you have it, no interview).
I sold my shares at 1.24, thought about getting back in around 1.11 but I decided to wait

---

Uhhh..."who" has room for only 200 listeners?

---

my apologies
it's this website, but you have to register:

http://traderscorner.p r o b o a r d s79.com/index.cgi?action=display&board=general&thread=1153373426&page=1

without spaces
 

---

Posted by T e x on :
 

quote:

---

Originally posted by Peaser:
No low at .90 from what I saw on the last sale tex.

I got that .90 in my account too as the low, but I doubt it's legit.

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by Peaser:
No low at .90 from what I saw on the last sale tex.

I got that .90 in my account too as the low, but I doubt it's legit.

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by Dynamite:

quote:

---

Originally posted by Peaser:
No low at .90 from what I saw on the last sale tex.

I got that .90 in my account too as the low, but I doubt it's legit.

---

Its just MM's grabbing some shares.

---

ohhh--how can you tell?
 

---

Posted by glassman on :
 

The Merger qualifies as a tax-free reorganization under Section 368 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, meaning that as the Reorganized Holdings Corporation begins to trade it has an option to adjust the market (trading price) to reflect the new Reorganized Holdings Corporations audited financials as it reflects on the per share book value.

this is what somebody came up with...

getting more interesting... more shade than a three hundred year oak but interesting as heck
 

---

Posted by T e x on :
 
Glass,

ya know, I noticed that phrase in the filing...

anyway, long story short--my post from the other thread:

"opens a whole new line of inquiry...

don't know much about these things, but it does seem to limited to specific entities:

quote:
Section 1.351-1(c)(1) states that a transfer to an investment company
will occur when (i) the transfer results in diversification of the
transferors' interests and (ii) the transferee is a Regulated Investment
Company (RIC), Real Estate Investment Trust (REIT), or a corporation more than
80 percent of the value of whose assets (excluding cash and non-convertible
debt obligations) are readily marketable stocks or securities. Section 1.351-
1(c)(5) provides that a transfer ordinarily results in the diversification of
the transferors' interests if two or more persons transfer nonidentical assets
to a corporation in the exchange.
http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-regs/co-19-95.txt

have no idea whether their bonds would qualify as "readily marketable," but would like surely like to understand the mechanism of adjusting "market (trading price)." "
 

---

Posted by glassman on :
 
well, we can honestly say that just when we thought we had seen everything? we find somebody with even more creativity...

i like this one....

i am not about to say it's really worth what the guys says it is, but he did file this with the SEC...

those big blocks going on the ticker after hours? i SUSPECT that the MM's are putting them together during trading hours for somebody... a large limit order?
 

---

Posted by T e x on :
 
what do you like?

I liked the logs--never hear much about them, anymore...
 

---

Posted by 10of13 on :
 
So Tex...and all..."he" can "regulate" the price...because "CVSU" has purchased FHAL and FHAL is going through a "name" change to CSVU and it is "being reorginized" so this quote from above applies: "...or a corporation more than
80 percent of the value of whose assets (excluding cash and non-convertible
debt obligations) are readily marketable stocks or securities."
 

---

Posted by glassman on :
 
this guy has come up with a whole new scheme...

reverse mergers have alwyas been been of interest to me...

PG is correct to warn people to be careful here...

reverse mergers are always a place where values come into question.... and yes they often sound too good to be true....

but they aren't always...
 

---

Posted by P Rowds on :
 
hey tex... you havn't heard much about the log thing cuz they have to go a different route according to ben stanley. talked to him about it 2 days ago. something happened where it's going to take a little more time (i know, i don't have the details cuz i didn't really understand them that well) but he said they *will* be going through with it...
 

---

Posted by portman on :
 

quote:

---

Originally posted by glassman:

The Merger qualifies as a tax-free reorganization under Section 368 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, meaning that as the Reorganized Holdings Corporation begins to trade it has an option to adjust the market (trading price) to reflect the new Reorganized Holdings Corporations audited financials as it reflects on the per share book value.

this is what somebody came up with...

getting more interesting... more shade than a three hundred year oak but interesting as heck

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by glassman:
i don't know...

i do know that he had to announce his intention to buy them in a filing because of the 5% rule...

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by T e x:
"set opening price"

I'm gonna learn about that, for sure...

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by blue_in_MI:
quite the interesting case, this FHAL. seems to be catchy, this whole buyout/merger play lately: IDWD, NDOL, GFCI, FHAL, probably some others I'm missing.

i have no opinion or commentary on FHAL, know absolutely nothing about the company. if past history is any indicator though: it's generally a good idea to get in early and then get out early with these types of PR's and deals. are sure fun to watch though.

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by Purl Gurl:
"there is a way to legally re-set the opening price...."

How?

Without a split, bankruptcy, share retirement,
cancel of shares, how?

Purl Gurl

---

that's what i've been saying...
we are gonna have to wait and see the true answer for sure...
it has something to with re-organisation of co that brings assets in the form of TAX-free(?)BONDS...

Venezuelan bonds ok? i guess.....
 

---

Posted by Purl Gurl on :
 
A pretend circumstance.

On merger effective date, FHAL is trading at 2.00
per share. Many are claiming this company will
pay a cash difference; 15.00 minus 2.00 - 13.00
cash per share. Actual amount is unimportant.

How will this company produce the money? FHAL
is bankrupt, this merger company does not trade
and appears to have zero revenues.

Where will this company come up with millions
and millions in cash to pay share holders?

More important, why would the company do this?

Purl Gurl
 

---

Posted by glassman on :
 
why did Lisa Marie sell her daddy's name?

i suspect the MM's are trying like hell to cover a short here too....



CONVERSION SOLUTIONS, INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
Statement of Cash Flows
January 1, 2006 - March 31, 2006

OPERATING ACTIVITIES

Net Income


($ 284,019)


Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities

INVESTING ACTIVITIES:




($ 284,019)



Stables


($277,000)


UCC Security Notes


($ 310,138,000)


Interest Receivable


(33,125,000)


Long-Term Investment in Bonds


($ 500,000,000)


Net Cash Provided by Investing Activities




($ 843,540,000)




FINANCING ACTIVITIES

Capitol Stock




$ 2,329


Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income


$ 803,430,836


Note Payable




$ 4,400,000


Long-Term Note




$ 36,000,000






$ 843,833,165

http://secfilings.nasdaq.com/filingFrameset.asp?FileName=0001297077%2D06%2D00004 6%2Etxt&FilePath=%5C2006%5C07%5C12%5C&CoName=FURIA+ORGANIZATION+INC+%2FDE%2F&For mType=8%2DK%2FA&RcvdDate=7%2F12%2F2006&pdf=
 

---

Posted by Purl Gurl on :
 
"that's what i've been saying..."

Yeah, this whole deal stinks of yet
another elaborate scam.

Bad part is thousands of people out there
are falling for this con. Floors me so
many are so gullible.

Purl Gurl
 

---

Posted by 10of13 on :
 
From the interview...

10of13
Member


posted July 20, 2006 10:08 PM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by 10of13:
QUICK NOTES ON INTERVIEW

1- "They have bought up over 100k shares on the market and if there are shorts it will have to be covered before the merger is complete" "short squeeze"

They used a trust to by up the float. The float will be held in the treasury and if needed at a future time then they may release them. The company is fully funded and will not need any dilution to fund operations

2- They will set the pps at 15.00 on the first day of trading and if the market supports it then that is the price "we" get...

3- Picure it as an IPO and we have the shares up front. It is his job to make sure that the share price stays at the $15 or more. The have huge contracts sitting on the table. They have bonds from third world countries to add to the list. He feels that $15 is undervalued

4-No r/s but perhaps a forward split after the merger is complete (8K will not allow them to do a r/s or any change in share structure until after the merger.

5-Rufas owns 9m of CVSU and none of FHAL

6- 3.5 billion in assets and 500 million in bank

7- S-4 is filed and 50 million set aside for each "project"

8- "We" would hold shares of AISS that is currently valued at $60/share. The board would like to have a value of 100/share within 3 months

9- the online lottery will be available in Ohio, Georgia and California (maybe another) by end of the year.

10- Fryyguyy just got puked on...time out


You can hear this interview by going to the CVSU website..
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

One last note...Rufas is 38 and I am going to marry him...

[ July 20, 2006, 22:21: Message edited by: 10of13 ]
 

---

Posted by glassman on :
 
what am i supposed to say to that PG...
we both know the market only reflects percieved value...

the Venezualan bond is the key here...

Venzuala does have a chithead for a president and lots of oil so who knows? i don't...
 

---

Posted by Purl Gurl on :
 
Recently, us Old Timers have watched two
bait and switch scams, NDOL and GFCI. We
also watched a very successful scam, the
GHLT rip off.

This one, however, is a bit more entertaining.
At least there is a challenge to understanding
this scam, unless this scam is so utterly
stupid as to be below our usual thinking level.

Purl Gurl
 

---

Posted by Dustoff 1 on :
 
well well well, ya mean there are no Teak hulled Windjamers a hauling mahogany logs in the sky? hmmm lmagine that..
 

---

Posted by glassman on :
 
that's why i didn't buy in at 17 cents...
stooopid me huh?

been tracking it since before that too....
 

---

Posted by Purl Gurl on :
 
QUICK NOTES ON INTERVIEW

* yet again she rolls her eyes *

Listen, you boys get busy with shovels;
mule manure is becoming very deep!

Purl Gurl

(Ten, not a comment directed at you, rather "Dufus")
 

---

Posted by glassman on :
 
PG? i still have 1000 shares of Henry Fahmans paper...free of course, but i do remember that filings don't mean a whole lot more than PR.... but still more...
 

---

Posted by Purl Gurl on :
 
"well well well, ya mean there are no Teak hulled Windjamers"

I am beginning to suspect the next pr news will
announce Captain Kirk, Spock, Scotty, the rest
of the crew will be beaming these logs up for
transportation to a Vulcan sawmill.

Purl Gurl
 

---

Posted by 10of13 on :
 
LOL...Purl...don't worry about it...I didn't listen to the interview..but took noted from what was posted by the posters that were...

I am enjoying this FHAL stuff...and trying to figure it out..it's a great learning "toy"...seems that maybe some of you old timers are learning with me...and to top it off..I have made nice $ at being a student...
 

---

Posted by Purl Gurl on :
 
"PG? i still have 1000 shares of Henry Fahmans paper"

* SCREAMS *

Do not say that unmentionable name!

I suckered for that scam, lost two grand and
my account is sh!t papered with worthless
spin off dividend stocks. I see those each
day I fire up my live feed, then cuss.

Pisser is, at one time I was up five grand,
decided to hold, then the crash.

Purl Gurl
 

---

Posted by glassman on :
 
i notice that some others over at ihub are saying the same thing as me..
ARCA bloodbath....

henry?

i got some $$ off that but i mentioned it to somebody that will never let me live it down... EVER!
 

---

Posted by Purl Gurl on :
 
"I am enjoying this FHAL stuff...and trying to figure it out..it's a great learning "toy"..."

Absolutely. None of us have quite figured out
this type of scam. New to me, most certainly.

Ten, this is what Allstocks is all about; true
meaningful discussion which benefits all. This
is why our board here is so very valuable.

Learning is priceless.

Purl Gurl
 

---

Posted by Purl Gurl on :
 
"henry?
i got some $$ off that...."

* bares her fangs - hisses *

You are asking for it!

Purl Gurl
 

---

Posted by Buford Baucom on :
 
Hi,

Maybe it's not a scam.

It sounds real.

BB
 

---

Posted by Purl Gurl on :
 
Hey! I have tiny winged blue monkeys flying out
of my big butt!

Purl Gurl
 

---

Posted by glassman on :
 
there's one now!

 

---

Posted by Purl Gurl on :
 
Ha! Ha! Yep, that is one of those monkeys!

However, those naked gorillas are the ones
you really have to watch out for.

Purl Gurl
 

---

Posted by Jo4321 on :
 
See, Purl, I agree that it is a scam. But I want to ride the scam. (not too long) You mentioned earlier today that we could ride the volatility. Do you think there is a good play here?

As you know my EOD order didn't get filled, guess we will see a huge gap in the AM based on the over 200 people that were in that chat room all salivating over each other and throwing out numbers like $100.00 per share!

Not sure where to get in at. I don't have that many funds, but I'd sure like to get rid of my deficit in one fell swoop.

Jo
 

---

Posted by Purl Gurl on :
 
"Do you think there is a good play here?"

Personally, I am surprised this one has not
crashed down to ten cents per share.

Jo, as more days pass, the closer this stock
is to crashing. Get in early, get out early,
and stay out.

This is only a speculation bubble and this
bubble will burst and crash hard. Just a
matter of time. Again, I am surprised this
one has not already crashed.

If my choice, I would be looking at other plays.

Keep in mind, like our friend Blue, I am a
very conservative and cautious trader.

Purl Gurl
 

---

Posted by Jo4321 on :
 
Thanks for the advice. I will definitely sleep on this one and decide in the AM.
Jo
 

---

Posted by 10of13 on :
 

quote:

---

Originally posted by Jo4321:
Not sure where to get in at. I don't have that many funds, but I'd sure like to get rid of my deficit in one fell swoop.

Jo

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by Jo4321:
Plus, I'm still kind of perturbed that I sold my .67 shares at .88 yesterday.


Jo

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by Jo4321:
Yeah, yeah, I know! I'm starting to see the light, really I am!

It's just that JUST ONCE, I'd like to be in the right place at the right time for one of these big runs! LOL!

I mean, how come none of my losers never becomes someone's shell company???

Jo

---

emotion

ego

death


Jo?

wanna party?

or build profit?

not being mean--simply pointing out obvious dichotomy
 

---

Posted by 10of13 on :
 
LOL..they will...after you sell...

Just an added note...with this FHAL...I trade for myself..and in another account for my sister...I have made alot more $ with my account than I have with hers..but it's because it is her $ not mine..I care if I screw hers up...it's a mental thing...

lastly...when I try to "flip"...unless I am getting out of a stock "for good" I only sell half of my shares...particularly if it is trading so funky...like FHAL..if it goes up I'm still in...if it goes down for a bounce...I can get more...win win...

See ya in the am...night all!
 

---

Posted by glassman on :
 
There are several types of public shells, which are all very expensive. They are also usually loaded with liabilities. If you reverse merge a company into a public shell (which usually has 100 or more shareholders and a lot of shares in the float) when the stock price goes up these 100 shareholders inevitably sell the stock and the price collapses. This can be detrimental to a company trying to grow through acquisition. This is far more expensive than the up front price paid to do the reverse merger with the public shell. Please keep this fact in mind when you are dealing with reverse mergers or public shells. This point is absolutely critical to understand.
 

---

Posted by T e x on :
 

quote:

---

Originally posted by glassman:
There are several types of public shells, which are all very expensive. They are also usually loaded with liabilities. If you reverse merge a company into a public shell (which usually has 100 or more shareholders and a lot of shares in the float) when the stock price goes up these 100 shareholders inevitably sell the stock and the price collapses. This can be detrimental to a company trying to grow through acquisition. This is far more expensive than the up front price paid to do the reverse merger with the public shell. Please keep this fact in mind when you are dealing with reverse mergers or public shells. This point is absolutely critical to understand.

---

quote:

---

Jo?

wanna party?

or build profit?

not being mean--simply pointing out obvious dichotomy

---

I want to build profit and then party to celebrate with you guys, when I'm out of the red. That's all.

Jo
 

---

Posted by glassman on :
 
yes tex....if you wish to seee the site? google it?
just copy, cut-n-paste, a sentence with quotes around it and it should come up...

googling this way is how i track down the real creeps....
 

---

Posted by glassman on :
 
http://www.tcc5.com/


http://www.reversemergersinfo.com/

http://www.worldcapitalmarket.com/shell.php
 

---

Posted by glassman on :
 
the trick is finding "clean" co's...
that takes a lot of DD...

then you have to wait....

or? you can run a news screener looking for the words reverse merger...

just remeber to tell US first, after you buy yours, of course
 

---

Posted by T e x on :
 

quote:

---

Originally posted by Jo4321:
TEX

quote:

---

Jo?

wanna party?

or build profit?

not being mean--simply pointing out obvious dichotomy

---

I want to build profit and then party to celebrate with you guys, when I'm out of the red. That's all.

Jo

---

quote:

---

or? you can run a news screener looking for the words reverse merger...

just remeber to tell US first, after you buy yours, of course

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by glassman:
the trick is finding "clean" co's...
that takes a lot of DD...

then you have to wait....

or? you can run a news screener looking for the words reverse merger...

just remeber to tell US first, after you buy yours, of course

---

achualy...that *is* a big interest...my idea is follow filings... try to get 1 to 2 month "lead time" notice.
 

---

Posted by T e x on :
 
good point: this *is* FHAL thread...
 

---

Posted by Purl Gurl on :
 
Jo exclaims with lots of excitement,

"we'll have to have a cyber-party!"

I am a party animal!



Purl Gurl
 

---

Posted by Dustoff 1 on :
 
working on the hook-up to ameritrade news alerts I can program it for reverse merger alerts..

System down for enhancments at present time..This otta be goooooood!

But the gorrila scart me....when I just looked up! An OMEN?
 

---

Posted by Purl Gurl on :
 
"But tell us over in the "who wants to be a
millionaire thread". People are too afraid
of Purl to go there."

* bares her fangs - snarls *

MUUHAHAHAHAAAA!

http://www.purlgurl.net/allstock/crush.wav

Purl Gurl
 

---

Posted by Dustoff 1 on :
 
A clean CEO? Billy Graham? nope watergate... impossible..LOL
 

---

Posted by Dustoff 1 on :
 
hitting the sack early. Nite Whale' splash!
 

---

Posted by Jo4321 on :
 
goodnight dustoff
 

---

Posted by Dustoff 1 on :
 
Well!!! up and at um! What kind of sleepy head landlubbers are you !!!! Fly with Owls at Night! Hard to soar with the Eagles in the morn'n...

Fish to be caught, fish hold on the boat to fill, port to find, with a buyer, and money to be made.

Plug the Boat and head to port before that Typhoon gets us..

[ July 21, 2006, 08:19: Message edited by: Dustoff 1 ]
 

---

Posted by Peaser on :
 

quote:

---

Originally posted by Purl Gurl:
Hey! I have tiny winged blue monkeys flying out
of my big butt!

Purl Gurl

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by Dustoff 1:
Geezz man! they are really working on this stock! big time!

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by Peaser:
1.15 bounce?

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by Dustoff 1:
Where's all the people peas? LOL

Solid blocks, I like um fragmented, buts it's all in an individuals style how to interpret the Graphics..It takes a while.

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by T e x:
actually, the best thing would be for it to channel for a good, long while...

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by Dustoff 1:
1.07 and 1.12 building medium sized blocks..

now 1.14 building
now 1.15 also blocks not fragmented.

---