posted
On the naked short list for two weeks now (longest allowed by SEC regs). Naked shorts will hafta cover their a$$ pronto on any outstanding shares or risk fines, deliscensure, etc. Go to www.buyi_s.net for listing (replace the _ with an "n" for all you newbies that don't know how to post websites)
Posts: 669 | From: Gouldsboro, Pa. | Registered: May 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
How can it be a short squeeze when it's been at rock bottom (.0001) for over 2 weeks?
Posts: 1269 | From: Dallas, Tx | Registered: Mar 2007
| IP: Logged |
posted
MM's can short in the quadruple zeros (you & I cannot). Possible acumulation going on. Just a hunch cause it's on the BUYINS list for two weeks w/o any change. If so they will need to run this up before 15 days on the list. That flips early this week so I'm keeping this on my radar. ACRI, FCPG, GBMR, ABSY, and AFML are on the same boat and worth watching as well.
Posts: 669 | From: Gouldsboro, Pa. | Registered: May 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
MM's can short in the quadruple zeros (you & I cannot). Possible acumulation going on. Just a hunch cause it's on the BUYINS list for two weeks w/o any change. If so they will need to run this up before 15 days on the list. That flips early this week so I'm keeping this on my radar. ACRI, FCPG, GBMR, ABSY, and AFML are on the same boat and worth watching as well.
Posts: 669 | From: Gouldsboro, Pa. | Registered: May 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
buy ins is a bullsh*t site. If it's on the actual Reg SHO list, that's one thing, but I would take anything from buy ins with a grain of salt. Even if it's on the Reg SHO list, a share buyback may not even move the prce one tick depending on the amount of shares out there, and potential company dilution.
Posts: 5508 | From: Southeastern PA | Registered: Jan 2006
| IP: Logged |
This even shows over 100 comapnies that have been on the list for more than 15 days,
Posts: 5508 | From: Southeastern PA | Registered: Jan 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
Interesting article. Wonder how so many companies seem to remain on the list for so long. Maybe "rotating shorts", like Short A has to cover, but does so when Short B sells to them, thus everyone is covering like they "have to", while the short interest doesn't change.
Personally, I'd be SHOCKED if there was a loophole that allows the "bad guys" to get around the spirit of the law Posts: 5508 | From: Southeastern PA | Registered: Jan 2006
| IP: Logged |
UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!
Printer-friendly view of this topic
![[Wink]](wink.gif)
