Mercury emissions, Clean Air, the EPA, Science and a simple solution Friday April 8, 10:32 am ET GER Estimated US Biomass market over $12.5 billion dollars annually
HUNTINGTON, N.Y.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--April 8, 2005--Green Energy Resources (Nasdaq otc.GRGR.pk) announced today the mercury emissions controversy is readily resolved through cofiring. Cofiring is an environmentally friendly, no capital investment method, of mixing wood biomass with coal to reduce greenhouse emissions. Naturally occurring chlorine in wood neutralizes (oxidizes) mercury. Cofiring is a proven means of reducing sulfur, nitrous oxide and carbon, the primary green house gases. The EIA (US energy information agency) confirms cofiring has virtually no cost to industry. The 9 states opting to sue the EPA over the regulations, do not seem to be aware of the simple cheap solution offered by cofiring. China's decision to double coal production for energy (1.1 billion tons), and Germanys announcements to cut nuclear energy, is clear indication cofiring has a pivotal role in the energy field. Great Britain has put substantial investment in cofire testing, especially RWE, Britains second largest power producer at the Aberthaw power plants in Wales. The US currently has 7 cofiring power plants. Green Energy Resources estimates the potential cofire biomass market at 250 million tons, valued at $12.5 billion dollars annually. The estimate does not take into account biodeisel, gasification hydrogen, direct burn and ethanol applications of wood biomass.
Green Energy Resources in advance of G7 meeting in the US on Tuesday, has asked the seven nations to publicly endorse alternative energies. GER is a wood biomass supplier of UTCS environmentally certified wood for the energy industry.
posted
So far I like what I see, but there is a problem, I cannot get a quote on a pink sheets.com. They say no one has filed form 211 with them. We need this clarified before we can go any further I believe. The glassman, art or someone please help.
Posts: 280 | From: w.sacto.ca. u.s.a. | Registered: Feb 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
from what I have found out,I would not have anything to do with this stock.My information is they are on the gray sheets,not pink.
Posts: 280 | From: w.sacto.ca. u.s.a. | Registered: Feb 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
I contacted Green Energy Resources. Here is the response...
Hi Dan,
Thanks for the interest.
A 211 needed to be RE-FILED with pinksheets, but GRGR is quoted on every market trade site. (but pinksheets) Any site that has stock quotes will do. ALL of them!
Thanks again for the interest and the re-filed 211 will be up this week on the pinks.
posted
wow sounds like the ceo needs a secratary is it a one man operation
-------------------- "The Americans will always do the right thing... After they've exhausted all the alternatives." - Winston Churchill Posts: 428 | From: indiana | Registered: Apr 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
It certainly lookes like a one-man operation. If what is on their web site is true I like the looks and sound of it. I will put it on my watch list and watch it for awhile. Thanks for the info Dan.
Posts: 280 | From: w.sacto.ca. u.s.a. | Registered: Feb 2004
| IP: Logged |
UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!
Printer-friendly view of this topic
![[Wink]](wink.gif)
