Sarah Palin getting punk'd by two Canadian DJs pretending to be French president Nicholas Sarkozy raises soooooo many questions. First, take a listen here.
For the love of God. "Joe le plumber"? Oy. Who could not see through this? If Palin's flacks are still employed by sundown, they should offer at least one limb as a personal sacrifice. This is incredibly lame. Sooo many questions but here's a couple?
1. How did Palin's staff - who never let her near reporters from outlets to the left of Hugh Hewitt -- allow these wacky DJs through? FOREIGN ones at that. Shudder.
2. Does this mean that Palin has met -- without preconditions -- with world leaders?
3. Isn't France a little too socialisty for her to be so chummy with Sarkozy?
4. They were talking for SEVEN MINUTES! That's longer than a Palin press availability. Who is their agent?
5. Palin didn't seem to have a reaction to the mention of "(H)Ustler's Nailin' Palin" the porno made in uh, honor, of Palin. Does she really not know that's out there?
The Palin camp reaction:
Governor Palin was mildly amused to learn that she had joined the ranks of heads of state, including President Sarkozy, and other celebrities in being targeted by these pranksters. C'est la vie," Palin spokesman Tracey Schmitt said in a written statement.
Your thoughts? Is this just funny -- or frightening?
posted
Truthfully, I have seen one or two such "pranks" by radio disk jockeys of this order too many.
I don't mean it as an apology for Palin, but I think that sort of stuff is a bit too far over to the teen agers sense of humor to be reasonable or acceptable.
It's about as worthy as thinking you should entertain the little old ladies at a Sunday after church tea party with a loud selection of scatology humor.
Posts: 11304 | From: Fort Worth, Texas | Registered: Mar 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
Palin is an idiot plain and simple all you have to do is listen to her and her husband is a bigger jerk
-------------------- Wise men learn more from fools than fools from the wise. Posts: 3827 | From: beautiful California | Registered: Sep 2008
| IP: Logged |
posted
Yes, Palin is a tad better off, but Palin's income tops a quarter mill a year after expenses. I wouldn't sneeze at that.
But both chicks notoriety is because of what they are......chicks you'd like to see their "sex tape".
Posts: 11304 | From: Fort Worth, Texas | Registered: Mar 2005
| IP: Logged |
-------------------- It is impossible to make anything foolproof because fools are so ingenious. Posts: 3311 | From: St. Louis | Registered: Feb 2005
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Lockman: After what Palin has been put thru I wonder if the Dem's will ever put up a woman candidate?
You apparently slept through Hillary's campaign.
I don't believe Hilary won the campaign , so technically the Dem's did'nt run a woman for President. I also believe that in her quest for the appointment she was severly attacked by the Democrat male chavanistic pigs. Some thing the respectful male Republican's would never have done.
-------------------- Let's Go METS!!! Posts: 3317 | From: CT | Registered: Dec 2006
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Lockman: After what Palin has been put thru I wonder if the Dem's will ever put up a woman candidate?
You apparently slept through Hillary's campaign.
I don't believe Hilary won the campaign , so technically the Dem's did'nt run a woman for President. I also believe that in her quest for the appointment she was severly attacked by the Democrat male chavanistic pigs. Some thing the respectful male Republican's would never have done.
The word you used was "candidate", which Hillary certainly was (and on a huge scale), "not nominee" (and remember, the republican party was not offered an option of accepting or rejecting Palin....that was solely on the part of McCain.....Palin was not a candidate for the nomination).
If you can't say what you intend to (or as it actually looks, you can't accept your own rhetoric), maybe you need to think carefully before you post more nonsense.
Posts: 11304 | From: Fort Worth, Texas | Registered: Mar 2005
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Lockman: After what Palin has been put thru I wonder if the Dem's will ever put up a woman candidate?
You apparently slept through Hillary's campaign.
I don't believe Hilary won the campaign , so technically the Dem's did'nt run a woman for President. I also believe that in her quest for the appointment she was severly attacked by the Democrat male chavanistic pigs. Some thing the respectful male Republican's would never have done.
The word you used was "candidate", which Hillary certainly was (and on a huge scale), "not nominee" (and remember, the republican party was not offered an option of accepting or rejecting Palin....that was solely on the part of McCain.....Palin was not a candidate for the nomination).
If you can't say what you intend to (or as it actually looks, you can't accept your own rhetoric), maybe you need to think carefully before you post more nonsense.
Excuse me!!!!!!!!!
Do you think the next woman to run (either party) will be met with the same double standard as these two?
-------------------- Let's Go METS!!! Posts: 3317 | From: CT | Registered: Dec 2006
| IP: Logged |
Hillary's claim to fame is her husband "success". You'd be amazed how many female professors at Universities are married to male professors. It's very common.
I would have voted for McCain today if it had been Hillary. The GOP knew this and tried hard to help her win...
Palin's claim is that she is governor of the 47th least populated state in the Union, for a little over a year.... Memphis TN has about he same amount of people as AK, and i wouldn't vote for the mayor of Memphis either...
Palin has not been abused anymore than anybody else has.
after reading so much about AK this past couple months? i would like to live there, but that has nothing to do with Palin...
-------------------- Don't envy the happiness of those who live in a fool's paradise. Posts: 36378 | From: USA | Registered: Sep 2003
| IP: Logged |
And no, I don't think "I'd do her" is degrading. It isn't so much different than a woman's "he's a hunk", which I bet you'd love to hear said about you. Personally, I discount anything said by any person that injects things like sex appeal into political discourse.
Either one being said indicates not a darn thing about whether or not the person be1ng spoken of would be a suitable person to elect or hold office, so maybe saying them says more about the speaker than it does about anything else.
In the case of Palin, "she's an idiot" does say a bit about her qualifications, something that needs to be said and honestly evaluated.
Whining about any of that says something about your qualifications.
Posts: 11304 | From: Fort Worth, Texas | Registered: Mar 2005
| IP: Logged |
UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!
Printer-friendly view of this topic
![[Big Grin]](biggrin.gif)
