VERT (1) .013 X (4) .0014 SCHB is still closed on .0013 and that is why we have not gone below .0013 today and yesterday.. when all other MM are at .0012 BID. Seems like this is intentional. Maybe I am reading too much into. But if they are closed why not have a BID of .001 or something? Any guesses?
oops I meant VERT .0013
Posts: 1124 | From: DC/VA | Registered: Jul 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
Not even interested in ludlow's Q&A section, Jen? I think I would at least like to read that, but then again, I am probably expecting too much from those morons.
quote:Originally posted by Jennifercd10: The only report I want to see is the OTC acceptance report of our application.
-------------------- Still holding, Still waiting, ...
Don't forget to send your letter to Echostar/DISH Network. 20 letters a day gets Q some play :) Posts: 621 | Registered: Jun 2005
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by buckwheatbob: That has got to be the most self centered, self serving, egotistical, arrogant statement I have ever heard. You have one little follower and claim he is the smartest investor on the board? You not only insulted every single person on this board but slapped them in the face with ignorance.
Where exactly did I say I am better? I'm saying I am right. And then I'm backing it up with PRs and really solid proof. You're just resorting to ad hominem attacks. And not even well-constructed ones at that.
Unlike you, I've admitted I've made mistakes, buckwheat. I don't have "followers" either. "Jonas" was a nobody to me but 4art had some sort of fascination about us being the same. "Shlik" got burned on the stock. I'm not entirely certain what is wrong with some of the other regular "bashers", but U4STFU or whatever his name is, is kind of funny sometimes. "Stashu" is simply a smart investor and doesn't bash at all. He is just able to see that the CEO isn't exactly an investor's best friend. That's goes for any stock you invest in, but ESPECIALLY for Pink Sheet stocks.
I don't invest in Apple because I like Steve Jobs, I invest in Apple because Steve Jobs is an a-hole *for me*. Frank isn't getting pushy on people on my behalf. Instead he's being apologetic towards me, an investor. All the meanwhile he's releasing PRs that almost look as if they are hiding things *from me*. A real CEO doesn't do that. A real CEO takes the blame for bad decisions and is direct with the investor. Frank's shown he can do that, and I hope this DVD and a full GAAP audit promote that.
Don't get me wrong, there are other forum posters on here that I'd love to speak well of, but if I mention their names, you'd probably be upset that they were consulting with me in PMs about their QBID investment. Which is why I haven't mentioned which individuals have spoken to me in PM. I won't do that. But suffice to say, there's been enough that it doesn't surprise me the PPS has been shaky. A lot of individuals are weak in the knees, but love to talk good of what Frank is doing.
My position has always been the same: I don't like Frank, but I love QBID.
Frank has no qualms diluting 10.5 billion into the float since February 2004. EVEN after doing so, we're still way undervalued, but because Frank did this, we (the investors) have to pay for it. He still gets his six figures (maybe 7?) a year.
How about that for a question. How much do you suspect Frank pays himself per year? Wouldn't it seem kind of dumb and shady if Richard couldn't even answer *that* for you?
quote:lol no biggie g
You can feel free to berate me on that mistake. I should not have said 14 million. I should have said 14 billion, whoops.
quote:We are all here for one reason: to make some mula. Bashers and Pumpers included.
Bashers aren't exactly looking out for QBID's best interest, though. They want to see the PPS decrease so they can accumulate. I question the existence of so-called bashers in QBID anymore. I imagine they've all bought the shares they needed or wanted.
Pumpers aren't exactly looking out for QBID's best interest, either. They want quick and easy money. They want to see the PPS run up 70% in two days so they can sell and buy back in two days later.
The smart pumpers and bashers on this forum and others have two accounts, one for bashing, one for pumping, and alternate so they can get in at one PPS and sell at another. You can sometimes tell who they are based on post days/times during short-term trend reversals. Since we are about to go through a long-term trend reversal, it's gotten much more difficult for them to affect the PPS. It also doesn't help that someone like myself confuses things. I'm an investor that doesn't always speak well of Frank.
quote:Thanks, I just wanted to have you in writing so that we can hang you on your words.
$.50 is a bit high to be selling at this point. That is a market cap of 19.5 billion * $.5 = $9.75 billion. We will not hit a market cap of 9.75 billion anytime soon. VIACOM itself is at like $4.5 billion market cap.
A more reasonable market cap in the next two years would be $975 million at a PPS of $.05
Now, if Frank accumulates $2 million in debt today and buys back shares at an average share cost of .0020, that will net him one billion shares and bring us to 13 billion in the float and an OS of 18.5 billion. Suppose he buys back about 5 billion in the OS this way, then we'd be at 14.5 billion total outstanding shares instead of 19 billion.
It makes sense that Frank had a low 8 figure bid on QBID with 19.5 billion shares in the OS. Assuming it's worth $20 million market cap to someone, that's 14.3 billion shares at the current PPS, which is what the float is close to now. That person was offering to basically buy all of QBID for .0014 PPS. That's why the stock has hit a bottom, and may climb from here, we'll see. I've yet to see a reverse head on a reverse head and shoulders trend reversal indicator.
-------------------- As a forum poster, it is ironic that you are held to a higher standard than a Pink Sheet CEO. Posts: 676 | Registered: Apr 2005
| IP: Logged |
VERT (1) .013 X (4) .0014 SCHB is still closed on .0013 and that is why we have not gone below .0013 today and yesterday.. when all other MM are at .0012 BID. Seems like this is intentional. Maybe I am reading too much into. But if they are closed why not have a BID of .001 or something? Any guesses?
have you got alphatrade dewit???
just wondering...
i do not have level II currently, but i would be willing to guess that SCHB is not closed...what it means is that he has not changed his order since the date it has...he has left his orders as they are, but no if he were closed it wouldnt even show up..he would be on the bottom on the page, below the .0001 MM...so yes i believe SCHB is open, just hasnt changed his order since whatever date it says
-------------------- Buy the silence-Sell the noise SFTV.004-.0075 AVNT.0018-.0033 FPPL.0034-.03 WEGI. My new Call Posts: 3100 | From: Louisiana | Registered: Apr 2005
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by pennnies: come on lets get those big buys!!!!
no no no !!lets keep the volume low low low....tone it down...keep it down...something is different in the air....
we used to used to have a 9:1 buy to sell ratio and we would downtick at the slighest sign of selling! now were at like 3:7 buy to sell ratio and 2 MM on bid and have been holding for at least 2-3 days now........
-------------------- Buy the silence-Sell the noise SFTV.004-.0075 AVNT.0018-.0033 FPPL.0034-.03 WEGI. My new Call Posts: 3100 | From: Louisiana | Registered: Apr 2005
| IP: Logged |
I can't find it. The only thing I heard was Penny-Trader saying something about Richard mentioning that the audit might only be completed to Q1 2005. We did not get any definitives. If that is the case though, then this would not be a GAAP audit, and thus QBID would not be OTC or AMEX eligible. So it *has* to be current if QBID is serious about moving to a new exchange. I think Frank is serious about moving to a new exchange, don't you?
quote:20 bucks for the ludlow reports now? lol i remember at first they werer 100 bucks a pop or something right??
Ludlow Capital looks as if it uses Bigcharts and makes its reports with Microsoft Word templates which it converts to PDF using CutePDF or any other free software.
While there is nothing wrong with that, it could be a great deal more professional. Hell, there's nothing they have done that I couldn't do all by myself.
While Ludlow doesn't get paid, there's nothing to say that the guy who writes the report isn't investing in these pink sheets himself.
quote:The only report I want to see is the OTC acceptance report of our application.
That almost sounds like a different Jennifer. Good to see you're looking at outcome-based actions now.
-------------------- As a forum poster, it is ironic that you are held to a higher standard than a Pink Sheet CEO. Posts: 676 | Registered: Apr 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
Thanks for making my point perfectly clear. You justified every point of it.
quote:Originally posted by g-invest:
quote:Originally posted by buckwheatbob: That has got to be the most self centered, self serving, egotistical, arrogant statement I have ever heard. You have one little follower and claim he is the smartest investor on the board? You not only insulted every single person on this board but slapped them in the face with ignorance.
Where exactly did I say I am better? I'm saying I am right. And then I'm backing it up with PRs and really solid proof. You're just resorting to ad hominem attacks. And not even well-constructed ones at that.
Unlike you, I've admitted I've made mistakes, buckwheat. I don't have "followers" either. "Jonas" was a nobody to me but 4art had some sort of fascination about us being the same. "Shlik" got burned on the stock. I'm not entirely certain what is wrong with some of the other regular "bashers", but U4STFU or whatever his name is, is kind of funny sometimes. "Stashu" is simply a smart investor and doesn't bash at all. He is just able to see that the CEO isn't exactly an investor's best friend. That's goes for any stock you invest in, but ESPECIALLY for Pink Sheet stocks.
I don't invest in Apple because I like Steve Jobs, I invest in Apple because Steve Jobs is an a-hole *for me*. Frank isn't getting pushy on people on my behalf. Instead he's being apologetic towards me, an investor. All the meanwhile he's releasing PRs that almost look as if they are hiding things *from me*. A real CEO doesn't do that. A real CEO takes the blame for bad decisions and is direct with the investor. Frank's shown he can do that, and I hope this DVD and a full GAAP audit promote that.
Don't get me wrong, there are other forum posters on here that I'd love to speak well of, but if I mention their names, you'd probably be upset that they were consulting with me in PMs about their QBID investment. Which is why I haven't mentioned which individuals have spoken to me in PM. I won't do that. But suffice to say, there's been enough that it doesn't surprise me the PPS has been shaky. A lot of individuals are weak in the knees, but love to talk good of what Frank is doing.
My position has always been the same: I don't like Frank, but I love QBID.
Frank has no qualms diluting 10.5 billion into the float since February 2004. EVEN after doing so, we're still way undervalued, but because Frank did this, we (the investors) have to pay for it. He still gets his six figures (maybe 7?) a year.
How about that for a question. How much do you suspect Frank pays himself per year? Wouldn't it seem kind of dumb and shady if Richard couldn't even answer *that* for you?
quote:lol no biggie g
You can feel free to berate me on that mistake. I should not have said 14 million. I should have said 14 billion, whoops.
quote:We are all here for one reason: to make some mula. Bashers and Pumpers included.
Bashers aren't exactly looking out for QBID's best interest, though. They want to see the PPS decrease so they can accumulate. I question the existence of so-called bashers in QBID anymore. I imagine they've all bought the shares they needed or wanted.
Pumpers aren't exactly looking out for QBID's best interest, either. They want quick and easy money. They want to see the PPS run up 70% in two days so they can sell and buy back in two days later.
The smart pumpers and bashers on this forum and others have two accounts, one for bashing, one for pumping, and alternate so they can get in at one PPS and sell at another. You can sometimes tell who they are based on post days/times during short-term trend reversals. Since we are about to go through a long-term trend reversal, it's gotten much more difficult for them to affect the PPS. It also doesn't help that someone like myself confuses things. I'm an investor that doesn't always speak well of Frank.
quote:Thanks, I just wanted to have you in writing so that we can hang you on your words.
$.50 is a bit high to be selling at this point. That is a market cap of 19.5 billion * $.5 = $9.75 billion. We will not hit a market cap of 9.75 billion anytime soon. VIACOM itself is at like $4.5 billion market cap.
A more reasonable market cap in the next two years would be $975 million at a PPS of $.05
Now, if Frank accumulates $2 million in debt today and buys back shares at an average share cost of .0020, that will net him one billion shares and bring us to 13 billion in the float and an OS of 18.5 billion. Suppose he buys back about 5 billion in the OS this way, then we'd be at 14.5 billion total outstanding shares instead of 19 billion.
It makes sense that Frank had a low 8 figure bid on QBID with 19.5 billion shares in the OS. Assuming it's worth $20 million market cap to someone, that's 14.3 billion shares at the current PPS, which is what the float is close to now. That person was offering to basically buy all of QBID for .0014 PPS. That's why the stock has hit a bottom, and may climb from here, we'll see. I've yet to see a reverse head on a reverse head and shoulders trend reversal indicator.
posted
I'm watching IBZT today & know that our turn is coming. If that ragly a$$ stock can roll on news, this thing can too. A published audit will start just by letting people know that regardless the share count Frank is serious about value. Believe me any news after that will add interest.
Posts: 4363 | From: waldorf,maryland,USA | Registered: Mar 2004
| IP: Logged |
"We are pleased with our year over year growth, our revenues have grown more than one hundred percent since Q1, 2004"
After working in a few accounting firms over the last 8 years, I've learned a thing or two. Amazing, huh? They put all this financial information together after the 1st qtr '05, and compared it to the 1st qtr '04. If unaudited financials statements were completed at this time, we can easily conclude the share numbers were figured at this time also, as the do have a place on the Shareholders Equity section of the Balance Sheet. If you want to say that this is not concrete evidence, that is fine, but the point is your evidence is not nearly as concrete as this. This is based on how the accounting world actually works, and until I am proven wrong, I will continue to believe that these number come from the quarter ended March 31, 2005.
-------------------- Still holding, Still waiting, ...
Don't forget to send your letter to Echostar/DISH Network. 20 letters a day gets Q some play :) Posts: 621 | Registered: Jun 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
Don't forget that "ragly a$$" stock was worth over $50 once upon a time. I am happy to say I did not own it for the decline, but I am in very low for this ride coming up.
quote:Originally posted by whizknock: I'm watching IBZT today & know that our turn is coming. If that ragly a$$ stock can roll on news, this thing can too. A published audit will start just by letting people know that regardless the share count Frank is serious about value. Believe me any news after that will add interest.
-------------------- Still holding, Still waiting, ...
Don't forget to send your letter to Echostar/DISH Network. 20 letters a day gets Q some play :) Posts: 621 | Registered: Jun 2005
| IP: Logged |
"We are pleased with our year over year growth, our revenues have grown more than one hundred percent since Q1, 2004"
After working in a few accounting firms over the last 8 years, I've learned a thing or two. Amazing, huh? They put all this financial information together after the 1st qtr '05, and compared it to the 1st qtr '04. If unaudited financials statements were completed at this time, we can easily conclude the share numbers were figured at this time also, as the do have a place on the Shareholders Equity section of the Balance Sheet. If you want to say that this is not concrete evidence, that is fine, but the point is your evidence is not nearly as concrete as this. This is based on how the accounting world actually works, and until I am proven wrong, I will continue to believe that these number come from the quarter ended March 31, 2005.
"We are pleased with our year over year growth, our revenues have grown more than one hundred percent since Q1, 2004"
After working in a few accounting firms over the last 8 years, I've learned a thing or two. Amazing, huh? They put all this financial information together after the 1st qtr '05, and compared it to the 1st qtr '04. If unaudited financials statements were completed at this time, we can easily conclude the share numbers were figured at this time also, as the do have a place on the Shareholders Equity section of the Balance Sheet. If you want to say that this is not concrete evidence, that is fine, but the point is your evidence is not nearly as concrete as this. This is based on how the accounting world actually works, and until I am proven wrong, I will continue to believe that these number come from the quarter ended March 31, 2005.
hey so when do you think the audit should be done? Being that you know how far they are by what they reported. Any guess?? You can PM the answer if you don't want the bashers eating you for your answer.
quote:Originally posted by polo1110: Don't forget that "ragly a$$" stock was worth over $50 once upon a time. I am happy to say I did not own it for the decline, but I am in very low for this ride coming up.
quote:Originally posted by whizknock: I'm watching IBZT today & know that our turn is coming. If that ragly a$$ stock can roll on news, this thing can too. A published audit will start just by letting people know that regardless the share count Frank is serious about value. Believe me any news after that will add interest.
Good job Polo. I got burnt on this bad last year & should have jumped on it first thing this morning. I believe you've got alot more upside coming, Good luck!
posted
g The Sunday evening before the PR was released, Frank called Richard and dictated it to him for print. I read it, like some others do, as a Q1 report. The PR about having the audit came out, I believe, on May 2nd. Being that any audit needs a cutoff date, the most logical would seem to be at the end of Q1. Those 32 days would give Q time for their own internal Q1 audit prior to starting the CPA audit. With that in mind, I read Franks statement as a Q1 of 05 audit.
"We are pleased with our year over year growth, our revenues have grown more than one hundred percent since Q1, 2004
-------------------- Your greatest investment is into a peaceful heart. Posts: 699 | From: Tampa, Fl. | Registered: Jun 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
Whiz, I got out after a small loss, there were too many bad things going on to justify staying in back then. Anyway, sorry guys...back to QBID
Pennies, there is no way to estimate when the audit will be done from the information provided. There is probably much more to be done than what was completed before that PR. It took 5 months to get that info out to the public, and not in the form of financial statements (although I'm sticking with my thoughts that they do have completed FS for the 1st Qtr). Let's hope the PR won't involve such a long wait.
-------------------- Still holding, Still waiting, ...
Don't forget to send your letter to Echostar/DISH Network. 20 letters a day gets Q some play :) Posts: 621 | Registered: Jun 2005
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Jennifercd10: g The Sunday evening before the PR was released, Frank called Richard and dictated it to him for print. I read it, like some others do, as a Q1 report. The PR about having the audit came out, I believe, on May 2nd. Being that any audit needs a cutoff date, the most logical would seem to be at the end of Q1. Those 32 days would give Q time for their own internal Q1 audit prior to starting the CPA audit. With that in mind, I read Franks statement as a Q1 of 05 audit.
"We are pleased with our year over year growth, our revenues have grown more than one hundred percent since Q1, 2004
......in other words, Frank was comparing apples to apples--not bananas!
quote:Originally posted by pennnies: maybe tomorrow we will get a nice PR!!!!!
All I want for my b-day 09/09 is a great PR
-------------------- Be Careful Of The Toes We Step On Today, They Could Be Attached To The Butt We Have To Kiss Tomorrow Posts: 4727 | From: Elk Grove ( Sacramento )CA USA | Registered: Jun 2004
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by suzainiee: Hope you have a great birthday, Doc, and wishing you many more.
Any day in September would still count for your birthday month, right?
you got it
-------------------- Be Careful Of The Toes We Step On Today, They Could Be Attached To The Butt We Have To Kiss Tomorrow Posts: 4727 | From: Elk Grove ( Sacramento )CA USA | Registered: Jun 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
Lets keep our selves set on the goals. At some point the audit will be published. Q will make an application to an exchange. We will have a Burbank Shareholder meeting. We will have a HUGE Las Vegas party. I will personally make sure that that happens. I’ve already talked to Rene and Richard about it and have invited Frank, Rene, Richard and all of Q. It’s just a matter of time.
-------------------- Your greatest investment is into a peaceful heart. Posts: 699 | From: Tampa, Fl. | Registered: Jun 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
Newbie help please !! I'm new to the trading world here I figured I'd start with $500 on some penny stocks to start to get my feet wet. I opened an account with Ameritrade and also subscribed to thier level II quote feed
I put up a few pink stocks such as (qbid)and don't see any active ask/buy on the screen for them but if I hit last sale it shows on the chart. I called ameritrade about QBID and they told me it just might be that symbol. But after trying a few more and getting the same issues ; I'd like to know a few things. 1) Is ameritrade pulling my chain or does anybody know if they just have an overall bad system setup for pink sheets etc.
2) Since I'll be mostly dealing with pink & OTCC as i get started in the stock world is Ameritrade the place to do it with using thier level 2?
3) would you suggest a diff broker with level 2 that supplies uptodate OTCC/Pink sheets ASK/BID displays
posted
Couple of Quick Questions for anyone? Seems to me that many investors might be waiting for the audit to be complete so we can know the outstanding shares. Does anyone know when or about when the audit will be complete?
posted
Does anyone know how many shares were used to aquire the film library and/or the studio?
And how would those extra shares affect Penny-Trader's float count?
Would they also affect g-invest's float count? Or not?
Since these things are mentioned in the PR, wouldn't they be figured into the OS numbers given?
Posts: 208 | From: Chicago Area | Registered: Feb 2005
| IP: Logged |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Q TELEVISION NETWORK Non-Union Live talk shows NON-UNION
Casting Director: Andrew Strauser Start Date: 9/1 Rate: No pay - tape provided Location: Burbank
SUBMIT ELECTRONICALLY IMMEDIATELY
OR SUBMIT HARDCOPY IMMEDIATELY ANDREW STRAUSER Q TELEVISION NETWORK 2525 N. NAOMI ST. BURBANK, CA 91504
NOTE: ALSO INCLUDE PERFORMANCE VIDEOS OR ACTOR SLATES IF AVAILABLE. DO NOT SEND DEMO TAPES.
Send us a note with what you do. Please note, this is a PR opportunity, this is not acting. So, union is OK.
Q Television Network, a 24/7 premium television network is organized to create, develop and feature television programming for the gay and lesbian community. This is a great opportunity for gay talent to be introduced to the network. Our talk show guests could end up with their own shows down the road. [DAILY TALK SHOW GUESTS] We have several live talk shows that are looking for guests. If you are a member of the GLBT community and have something to promote or perform, send your pic and resume and tell us what you do. Authors, actors, singers, comedians, experts, novelty acts, circus, fringe, etc...
Posts: 257 | Registered: Jun 2005
| IP: Logged |
DATE TITLE TYPE CASTING DIRECTOR START DATE UNION 9/1 5:34 PM QUEER EDGE Cable Andrew Strauser 9/6/05 NON-UNION 8/31 8:45 PM FLESH AND THREADS Cable Andrew Strauser NON-UNION 8/31 6:29 PM FLESH & THREADS Cable Andrew Strauser NON-UNION 8/31 5:08 PM Q TELEVISION NETWORK Non-Union Andrew Strauser 9/1/05 NON-UNION
Posts: 257 | Registered: Jun 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
Dont quote me on this because i didnt see it with my very own eyes, but i have heard from a reliable source that there was NO AH trades today...correct me if im wrong...and im talking about 10M+ not any little buys/sells...
in combination with the shift in trading style in past couple days by the MM and i am beginning to wonder what is occuring...if anything...just keep this in mind
-------------------- Buy the silence-Sell the noise SFTV.004-.0075 AVNT.0018-.0033 FPPL.0034-.03 WEGI. My new Call Posts: 3100 | From: Louisiana | Registered: Apr 2005
| IP: Logged |
Topic Closed
UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!
Printer-friendly view of this topic
![[Wink]](wink.gif)
![[Smile]](smile.gif)
![[Big Grin]](biggrin.gif)
