posted
Yes -- like in Perry Mason when they drop the bomb and then go to commercial...
Posts: 797 | From: Phoenix | Registered: Jul 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted August 17, 2005 16:38 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- PRIDEVISION/OUttv update: Not sure if anyone is interested with all the other news, but in any case here is an e-mail that I received today. I think that it's great news especially for those of us who are following the Pridevision offer by "Q"
From: Wendy Donnan[wendy@pridevision.com] To: Wayne ********* Sent: Wed 8/17/05 1:32PM Subject: Re Anything New
Hello, Wayne.. Well, we are starting to do some sharing of programming! We will be airing in Canada "Queeredge" with Jack E Jett, which is a Q Television show, starting in September.. We are very excited about this~! Thanks Wendy
Wendy Donnan Director of Programming and Operations
6166954 Canada Inc. "OUTtv" and "HARD on PrideVision" 491 Church Street Suite 200 Toronto, Ontario M4Y 2C6
(t) 416-979-2900 x 209 or 1-877-PRIDE TV (f) 416-979-1300
(e) wendy@pridevisiontv.com
call 1-877- PRIDE TV or your local cable or satellite provider and subscribe to PrideVision TV today!
-------------------- Be Careful Of The Toes We Step On Today, They Could Be Attached To The Butt We Have To Kiss Tomorrow Posts: 4727 | From: Elk Grove ( Sacramento )CA USA | Registered: Jun 2004
| IP: Logged |
This topic has coMe up many times. We all know that the financials will need to be done and the company in a reporting status before an exchange upgrade can happen
So your statement is just a pile of hot air as usual
Rod
-------------------- Dont buy or sell on my opinions, do your research. Make sure you know what you are buying before you buy.
This is a non reporting pink sheet with very high risk. From high risk comes high rewards. Dont invest more then you can afford to lose. Posts: 4801 | From: Prescott, ON, Canada | Registered: May 2004
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Penny-Trader: Stashu. You are a waiste of good skin
Rod
Sorry, I don't understand. I looked up "waiste" in the dictionary and couldn't find it. Can someone translate?
Posts: 208 | From: Chicago Area | Registered: Feb 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
That is Olde English for "waste" I am sure -- not liking name-calling (that's why I took the name out of the quote on my last post), but I love the insult itself!!
Posts: 797 | From: Phoenix | Registered: Jul 2005
| IP: Logged |
And I thought you could understand this as I'm typing very slowly.
But you have proven me wrong. You are a waist of grey matter
It may be over your head but your 4 year old friends should be able to help you understand
Sorry for throwing you off with the extra letter on the end.
Good come back though
I'm surprised you need to get the dictionary out, but you obviously have to use it a lot if you where able to find the Ws that quickly
Lol
Rod
-------------------- Dont buy or sell on my opinions, do your research. Make sure you know what you are buying before you buy.
This is a non reporting pink sheet with very high risk. From high risk comes high rewards. Dont invest more then you can afford to lose. Posts: 4801 | From: Prescott, ON, Canada | Registered: May 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
Well I'm back to work. They pay me way to much to be sitting here educating nuts that sound like cashews
Talk to you all later
Oh I forgot to thank DJ for the price increase and great pr. Lol
Later guys
Rod
-------------------- Dont buy or sell on my opinions, do your research. Make sure you know what you are buying before you buy.
This is a non reporting pink sheet with very high risk. From high risk comes high rewards. Dont invest more then you can afford to lose. Posts: 4801 | From: Prescott, ON, Canada | Registered: May 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
doc- that is great, you had the news about 3 weeks ago...nice job! now if you could only squeeze out some of that juicey news we are waiting on that would be spectacular. im thirsty
Posts: 2794 | From: nyc | Registered: Aug 2005
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Penny-Trader: We are not getting anywhere with this and frankly if you feel you are right and are still holding your shares, then you are very foolish.
No offense Rod, but you're standing alone. You'll note that only "pennies" seems to back the 3.5 billion float number, and he's quit commenting on the issue since I explained how easy it is to figure outstanding shares. 4Art, well, there's a REASON he's not saying he believes the float is 3.5 billion.
If you think it's so foolish to hold onto this stock with 14 billion shares in the float, I have a challenge for you. If I can get a professional stock investor from the investing firm of your choosing to email you personally explaining exactly how many shares there are in QBID's float based on the PR, will *you* sell your shares?
Cause personally, I see the 19.5 billion outstanding shares as nothing. At a price of .0013 and with Frank's 10.5 billion share dilution over the last year and a half, it makes sense that this stock fell, but what doesn't make sense is how far it fell. The market capitalization with the OS of 19.5 billion and the PPS of .0014 is a scant $27.3 million.
IMHO, we should be at about $140 million market capitalization. That's a .0071 PPS. *THAT* is why I'm in this stock.
For you to sit there and lie and say that the OS is under 14 billion when the PR clearly states it's 14 billion and 5.5 billion (a total of 19.5 billion) really boggles my mind. Are you intentionally trying to confuse investors? Do you really have any concern for those people in this stock? Be realistic, and quit living under the assumption that some hunch is right.
For christ's sake man, I have the PRs to at least back up what I say. I have no idea what confused little route you want investors to go down, but it's not genuine, and it bothers me that you'd knowningly scam people like that.
I'm not selling out, because QBID is undervalued. On the other hand, I suspect that you're upset with your investment, and it bothers you that I'm preventing you from pumping the stock.
If I'm wrong, I have given out my email for Frank or Richard to contact me and correct me. They won't, because they enjoy this little tiff we are having, because they don't have to confirm the number for you. Not only will you nor anyone on here not ask, but if you do, they'll hem and haw on the issue.
Someone earlier just said that Richard dodged the issue by saying he wasn't certain himself. Bull****, Richard knows exactly what day the audit is accurate up to, it was accurate to the day it was released. I can't believe you guys accept a non-answer from anyone like that. The PR people should know. QBID's transfer agent shouldn't be gagged. There's a multitude of things wrong with this stock, but no one here is willing to acknowledge it, or get Frank and Richard to remedy the situation.
Penny, I respect you and I respect your position in the stock. I do not respect your continued defense of this 3.5 billion in the float number. Do you really think people on this forum are that gullible that they are going to fall for it?
[ September 06, 2005, 15:56: Message edited by: g-invest ]
-------------------- As a forum poster, it is ironic that you are held to a higher standard than a Pink Sheet CEO. Posts: 676 | Registered: Apr 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
Actually the audit as of now is probably only accurate up until June 30, the end of the second quarter. No one can give you accurate numbers up to the previous day. It would take longer than a day or two to check them all. that is why it is an AUDIT and not just a print out from your accounting software.
For example, here is IBM's quarterly report filed on July 26 for their financials up until June 30.
At this point I wouldn't be surprised if we don't see a completed audit until late October consisting of the numbers up through the third quarter and that was why they gave us the teaser numbers now.
-------------------- I just want to make enough money to be eccentric. Posts: 2412 | From: Atlanta | Registered: Aug 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
G-invest the reason I stopped posting on the matter is no one knows who is right. Why keep fighting the unknow? Accept what they give you and don't act like you have solid proof of facts you know you have none.
I stopped posting about the float because I don't have proof nor do you to back what our numbers.
You guys should be talking about PR's and numbers you have seen in the PR's. Nothing else matters because it is all hear-say.
I don't think you or rod are wrong its just we don't know so lets all stop talking about the things we can't prove and focus on the info that is given.
Nothing more nothing less guys..
Posts: 1313 | From: Florida | Registered: Jun 2005
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by g-invest: Penny, I respect you and I respect your position in the stock. I do not respect your continued defense of this 3.5 billion in the float number. Do you really think people on this forum are that gullible that they are going to fall for it?
quote:Originally posted by g-invest: Penny, I respect you and I respect your position in the stock. I do not respect your continued defense of this 3.5 billion in the float number. Do you really think people on this forum are that gullible that they are going to fall for it?
quote:Originally posted by juice: did someone once say investigation??
Really! I am kinda new to pinks, but I have NEVER seen consistent MM trades like that before in any of my other holdings. If it is so common, why isn't it -- well -- more common????
Posts: 797 | From: Phoenix | Registered: Jul 2005
| IP: Logged |
I am trying to talk my mom into joining the Q family, and she is totally new to Pinks. Since I am not much "older," I figured I would turn to you for some help in getting some information. Obviously, the link G posted to this site is helpful, but I remember a bunch of stuff being posted in the Q threads that are more "folksy" in terms of explaining pinks -- particularly the effects of MMs.
If anyone has some of the old explanations of MMs around, could you please post them or PM me with them? I think it is kind of a good thing to bump every now and then anyway, since so many new investors come here before they buy.
Probably could find all the old posts easier if I did not babble so much, but hey -- that what this little family is for
quote:Originally posted by juice: did someone once say investigation??
Really! I am kinda new to pinks, but I have NEVER seen consistent MM trades like that before in any of my other holdings. If it is so common, why isn't it -- well -- more common????
neither have I, it does concern me, I think we should hound IR about it. Lets make a big stink... Im not satisfied with Richards answer, its done to "inflate the volume". I will be on the phone tomorrow and I am going to send out a few emails. For all that are interested in doing so, Richards number is 1-617-314-7379. I think we should all make this a priority question when we call.
Posts: 2794 | From: nyc | Registered: Aug 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
I am also starting to think that soon would be a good time for T to hire an outside IR/PR firm. No offense meant at all to Richard, but it certainly seems to have done well for the other companies I have seen do it.
Posts: 797 | From: Phoenix | Registered: Jul 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
It will all fall in place when people least expect! Just a matter of time.
Posts: 4363 | From: waldorf,maryland,USA | Registered: Mar 2004
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by 4Art: I read that these 9000000 posts are just transfers; not trades. Anyone care to elaborate on this?
4Art yes, we are assuming they are transfers between mm's, but they may also be naked shorts that are illegal which is holding down the pps which IMO is cause for concern... this must stop!! Someone asked me about the MM movement on the bid ask and the 9 mill blocks the other day, I wrote this below, jsut a tidbit of info let me know what you think: quote: -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Originally posted by juice: maestro- the way I see it if VERT is on the inside ask, it means VERTS orders must be filled before the next mm moves in to fill orders. if say the ask is in fact .0014 x 1, the problem with VERT or NITE being there (just taking a guess because this is usually how it plays out I think) is they never or rarely get filled and move up and allow other mm's to get inside.
Now why is this the case? Well if the mm's are transferring shares back and forth, mm ABCD could transferr 100 million shares to VERT whos on the inside ask so he can fill orders all day without upticking. and this plays out over and over again.
So if we see VERT or NITE jumping around or off the ask (like we saw this morning) this may sometimes suggest some movement up, and we did gap up for about 10 min hehe. Maybe I am completely wrong here, but to the best of my knowledge this is what is happening. Hope that helps. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Naturally those 9mill blocks we've seen would be those shares transferred to MM's, and as MT has shown us these blocks dont even affect the bid or ask. Its very interesting how this manipulation is still taking place even with this "investigation" that Frank clearly stated in a p/r. What do you think about that MT? Eventually this will have to stop for qbid to move if you ask me....
Posts: 2794 | From: nyc | Registered: Aug 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
ROFLMAO! Now, that is the most common sense I have heard in the last week worth of posts. You are absolutely right and it is anyones guess until the final audit has ben posted.
quote:Originally posted by Farley: Rhetorical rant:
A little interjection into this boring a$$ pi$$ing match,
The question is what is the TRADEABLE FLOAT?
OS and Tradeable float are 2 entirely different animals. So the OS is 19.5 billion, what is the float?
posted
I speak from near TOTAL ignorance here, but just from a layman's ignorant point of view, it doesn't makes sense!
1) How come MMs NEED to trade so many shares between themselves on such a regular basis?
2) Why 9Million? I have always been taught to be wary of 9's -- f/e if you want to keep below govmnt radar, keep your financial transactions below $10k
[OFFTOPIC] Just read the contributors. Public thanks to Germany, Great Britain, Maldaves, Algeria, and all the others who have made token contributions to Katrina. You all know we can afford it, but thanks for showing your support and national condolences. Especially thanks to contries who make their contributions directly to the Red Cross, with ONE exception. Japan -- dudes, $1million isn't even a token for your country. Step it up by a couple of zeros. The $63,000 contribution from the Maldaves means more than $1Million from a country as rich as we are.[/OFF TOPIC]
Posts: 797 | From: Phoenix | Registered: Jul 2005
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by buckwheatbob: ROFLMAO! Now, that is the most common sense I have heard in the last week worth of posts. You are absolutely right and it is anyones guess until the final audit has ben posted.
posted
mrgr8avill- this is exactly my concern, excellent points: 1) How come MMs NEED to trade so many shares between themselves on such a regular basis?
2) Why 9Million? I have always been taught to be wary of 9's -- f/e if you want to keep below govmnt radar, keep your financial transactions below $10k
Posts: 2794 | From: nyc | Registered: Aug 2005
| IP: Logged |