posted
The following is my technical analysis on a pink sheet stock. Normally people don't do this, so take it with a grain of salt. I'll cover both good and bad.
quote:CHART 1: Year, Volume (by week)
1. The fall in volume associated with the launch of QBID. Interest wanes after launch as it becomes evident they still have to get carriers and subscribers.
2. Gay games announced. Anomaly.
3. Series of rises and falls.
Since May or so, QBID was a very risky stock. It hit its low with an extremely low volume of about 400 million after a week that was about 1.2 billion volume. It then had a series of low volume days and gradually rose then fell. (1)
Mid-November, interest grew and exploded with the announcement of more RCN subscribers and the gay games. It's important to note this because this event, while big, doesn't even compare to the June coverage the Q has had. It sparked off an interest that grew to a peak in mid-March with buyout rumors of Pridevision in Canada. (2)
Those rumors and the PR were eventually scaled down to just talks about sharing content. Other important items kept the volume high, waiting for the next big announcement and then disappointment when it didn't come. It ended on a down note as June turned out to not be the explosive month the CEO was promising. (3) (Note that the last week on the chart is only two days in, so that last bar is not indicative of this current week's true volume.)
1. Price per share: Small rise in mid-May on carrier rumor. Downfall in PPS since. End is predictor for PPS specifically from g-invest (myself)
2. RSI: Support falls below 50.
3. RSI: Support levels.
4. MACD: 9-day Moving Average crosses Divergence in uptick.
5. MACD: 9-day Moving Average crosses Divergence in downtick.
6. MACD: 9-day Moving Average crosses Divergence in slight uptick.
7. Volume: Peak volume at end of May. End is predictor for volume specifically from g-invest (myself)
Okay, I'll try to make this simple and brief, but that's nigh impossible to do with TA.
First off, the PPS has been relatively stable compared to a year ago. A year ago, had individuals known then what we do now, they would have sold on sheer risk. Granted, Q Television was new and hot, but many individuals were buying into one detail, a launch. While launching provided QBID status as "one of those real pinks", it didn't do much otherwise. The last two months have been uneventful, and a good time to buy, considering the support at these levels. A really good PR, or a huge carrier announcement, could bring this to .02 again easily. To stay there, Frank would need to release O/S *AND* get QBID reporting. He probably won't do that till he's got an idea of what the current PPS should be, and is. (1)
When the RSI crosses the 50 mark, it's usually a sign to sell. (2) Again, it's hard to do TA on a pink sheet stock. When it's a solid line below 50, that's usually an indicator to buy, though it can continue to go down (but not usually for long). (3) Also if it passes below RSI 20 on no bad news, that's another good sign to buy, because it simply indicates oversold, and usually someone big will come along and throw in. MM's fear dropping the RSI below 20 on no news and actively avoid it usually.
I know a few people that swear by the MACD and have made quite a bit playing stocks based on this. ERICY is a good stock to do this, as are many other Small to Mid cap Nasdaq stocks. When the 9 day moving average (EMA, blue line) crosses the Divergence (red line) in an uptrend, its usually a signal to buy, or rather, to have bought one or two increments before it (in this case, days). (4) As you can imagine, if it crosses Divergence negatively in a downtrend, it means you should have sold a few increments before it. A lot of traders buy before what appears to be a certain cross-over, and sell at the end of a day where the blue line. Currently, the MACD would indicate you should have bought at the low two days ago to get in on a QBID rise. (6)
Volume is, put simply, not good for a day trader. (7) We've been on a downtrend for about a month now, and it's getting lower. Which means we are poised for a short shake, and then; on a good PR, we may rise to .0035 to .0040 (1, end bar). Volume will slightly increase, and then steadily increase, till someone notices this stock and it pops. (7, end bar)
Now, this is just an assessment. I could keep going lower, but I can't imagine how on this low of volume. I would instead imagine that we'll see no more panic sellers, and probably see some gradual shifting to green.
But, don't get your hopes up. In my honest opinion, the only reason you should be in QBID right now is if you truly believe in what Frank and Q Television have to offer, or, you just want to get in before the next pop on a decent PR.
For the rest of us, I would encourage you to keep putting pressure on Frank to release the O/S, get fully reporting, and get a carrier. If he gets a carrier (or two, see my previous post here:http://www.allstocks.com/stockmessageboard/ubb/ultimatebb.php/ubb/get_topic/f/8/t/014414/p/57.html#001969 for why I think he might announce two at once instead of one) then he can release a PR about it, but he's still going to have to release O/S or complete an audit for people to actually stay invested in this.
-------------------- As a forum poster, it is ironic that you are held to a higher standard than a Pink Sheet CEO. Posts: 676 | Registered: Apr 2005
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Rich735: Hey g-invest,how do I make the chart bigger so I can see the MACD better like in the one you posted here?
Click on "CHART STYLE" and make the size "MEDIUM", "LARGE", or "BIG". You can right click on the image and go to "Properties" and then highlight the URL to copy it and put it between IMG tags on here. that's done using ubb code.
code:
[IMG] and [/IMG]
Please note that if the image is too large, then it will be scrolling side to side in the forums here, and people don't like that. I use "Medium" size, I believe.
-------------------- As a forum poster, it is ironic that you are held to a higher standard than a Pink Sheet CEO. Posts: 676 | Registered: Apr 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
On Yahoo News Just Out, Read what Frank said
MTV launches new gay cable TV channel By Claudia Parsons 2 hours, 58 minutes ago
NEW YORK (Reuters) - The prospect of a television channel entirely devoted to gay programs for gay people may strike some as unnecessary and others as a sign of immoral times. Media giant Viacom thinks there's money in it.
ADVERTISEMENT
Logo, launching on Thursday under the MTV Networks umbrella, is not the first channel to target gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender people, but it is the most widely available, on cable boxes in 10 million homes.
And it is the first time a major U.S. conglomerate such as Viacom has entered a niche market that, despite Logo's promise to deliver family-friendly entertainment, is viewed with concern by some of the same people who worry about too much sex, violence and profanity on TV.
"It's going to be a tough road and you need a Viacom to drive that truck," said Paul Colichman, head of Here!, a video-on-demand gay satellite channel launched in 2003.
"Our mere existence offends people."
Logo has been in the works for more than two years under the guidance of Brian Graden, the man responsible for such MTV hits as "The Osbournes." Logo has bought 200 movies and has more than 20 new documentaries scheduled for the first year as well as half a dozen original series, including a drama titled "Noah's Arc" about four black gay men in Los Angeles.
Janice Crouse, a senior fellow at Concerned Women for America, which describes itself as a conservative Evangelical group of 500,000 members, said it was "a sad day for America."
She said MTV was in a powerful position to influence youth and it was "unconscionable" to present in a positive view of a promiscuous lifestyle that causes "illnesses and diseases."
"I see it as indoctrination of children to present the gay lifestyle as something that's normal, as something they don't have any choice over," Crouse said in an interview.
SELLING CARS TO GAYS
Logo General Manager Lisa Sherman cited studies saying there were some 15 million openly gay people in America, an attractive demographic for advertisers, considering that many will have no children, meaning more disposable income.
Logo's advertisers include travel company Orbitz, carmaker Subaru, mobile phone maker Motorola and Miller Lite beer.
Frank Olsen, founder and major shareholder of Q, a small satellite subscription gay channel, said the reason there were now three players was simple -- money.
"I don't think anybody has become more tolerant of gay people. The Christian right still says we're going to be condemned and we're going to be in hell," Olsen said. "But Ford needs to sell more cars and if they can sell them to gay people without offending straight people, they will."
Q and Here! market themselves as just another of the many niche options out there, from golfing to gardening channels.
Colichman said more than 30 percent of his viewers were straight -- a figure he says includes feminists and liberals sick of the way women are portrayed in the mainstream media, and straight men who will watch anything about lesbians.
Here! sells monthly subscriptions for $6.99 to $9.99 as well as single programs for $3.99 and Colichman said the company registered around 1 million transactions a month, fairly evenly split between single sales and subscriptions.
"Our business is growing by 15 percent per week," he said, adding that he had spent $50 million on content in 18 months.
Colichman's production company, Regent Entertainment, is an established player with hit movies as "Gods and Monsters." He sells content to television stations in over 100 countries. He sees Logo as another customer for Regent productions.
Village Voice columnist Michael Musto appears in a documentary about the history of gay Americans that will kick off Logo's programming on Thursday. He said comedies like "Will & Grace" paved the way for mainstream gay TV, and cable channels had pushed the boundaries even further with the likes of "The L-Word" about glamorous lesbians in Los Angeles.
Despite that, Musto said Logo appeared to be treading cautiously.
"We live in a very puritanical culture that gets very queasy about sexuality issues of any kind and that may be why Logo is soft-pedaling the sexuality issue," Musto said.
posted
you ever notice how anytime Logo is interviewed, Franks name is in there, with a comment that never seems contraversial or competitive?
you ever wonder why?
Logo wants Q to succeed, and they are helping them by making Frank available in all interviews.
Viacom is helping us for a reason. they are either going to buy us out or dont want to be a single target.
either way I think it is good.
either way we are gaining more and more exposure.
Either way i will be happy.
Rod
-------------------- Dont buy or sell on my opinions, do your research. Make sure you know what you are buying before you buy.
This is a non reporting pink sheet with very high risk. From high risk comes high rewards. Dont invest more then you can afford to lose. Posts: 4801 | From: Prescott, ON, Canada | Registered: May 2004
| IP: Logged |
This is my first time posting, but I have been here since late Feb or early Mar. of 2004. With the exception of the .000's I have been here through it all. With that in mind please don't come at me with basher or pumper labels because I am niether.
At this very moment, QTV is at a very critical point. The events of the next 6 months to 1 year will seal our fate. We as stockholders know this, and the staff at Q know this. It does no good to call Q and bitch about your penny stock investment nor does it do any good to call your cable company 100 times telling them you want Q.
What this stock and the issues surrounding it need is massive amounts of negative exposure in the media. Remember the first Harry Potter book? It became a best seller because the right wing freaks made it the number one news story in america. Had they have kept quite, nobody would have ever known about Harry Potter. Mention in the USA Today is a good start. However mass emails to the right wing media host and religous groups informing them of a public access G/L/T TV channel will cause G/L/T television to show up on your local nightly news. They will use words like un-moral, sodomites, drag queen, heathens, sinners, the afflicted, and any other BS terms they can think of. There will be an uproar from every side of the story. In the end however, it will be G/L/T television that comes out on top.
Q is in a good spot. If an uproar can be created around this subject, the FCC will be forced to get involved. With public decency standards being what they are, the FCC can very easily restrict G/L/T television to the pay per view or subscription world. If that happens, will Viacom stay in the market? By going to subscription based viewership, they greatly limit the amount of revenue they can bring in as compaired to a 24/7 public access channel. Q on the other hand has known all along that they would air on a subscription only basis, and has been setting up the network accordingly.
Everyone here who owns Q bought into a longshot. People can pump, and people can bash, but in the end none of it means a damn thing. All we can do is ride this one out and see where we end up.
Posts: 18 | From: Redlands, CA, 92374 | Registered: Sep 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
i just wanted to say thanks to G-invest. you have turned out to be a good guy in here.
I like reading all your posts now.
also thanks to everyone that has been bringing out the dd for us here. I have been on the road since Friday, and have not been able to post much. Im on the road again tomorrow for another day. I will be home and available again on Thursday.
Nice to see the upturn, I agree, we are set up for a run. Ric we could use your skills on the charts here. hope to see you back in here soon
Rod
-------------------- Dont buy or sell on my opinions, do your research. Make sure you know what you are buying before you buy.
This is a non reporting pink sheet with very high risk. From high risk comes high rewards. Dont invest more then you can afford to lose. Posts: 4801 | From: Prescott, ON, Canada | Registered: May 2004
| IP: Logged |
This is my first time posting, but I have been here since late Feb or early Mar. of 2004. With the exception of the .000's I have been here through it all. With that in mind please don't come at me with basher or pumper labels because I am niether.
At this very moment, QTV is at a very critical point. The events of the next 6 months to 1 year will seal our fate. We as stockholders know this, and the staff at Q know this. It does no good to call Q and bitch about your penny stock investment nor does it do any good to call your cable company 100 times telling them you want Q.
What this stock and the issues surrounding it need is massive amounts of negative exposure in the media. Remember the first Harry Potter book? It became a best seller because the right wing freaks made it the number one news story in america. Had they have kept quite, nobody would have ever known about Harry Potter. Mention in the USA Today is a good start. However mass emails to the right wing media host and religous groups informing them of a public access G/L/T TV channel will cause G/L/T television to show up on your local nightly news. They will use words like un-moral, sodomites, drag queen, heathens, sinners, the afflicted, and any other BS terms they can think of. There will be an uproar from every side of the story. In the end however, it will be G/L/T television that comes out on top.
Q is in a good spot. If an uproar can be created around this subject, the FCC will be forced to get involved. With public decency standards being what they are, the FCC can very easily restrict G/L/T television to the pay per view or subscription world. If that happens, will Viacom stay in the market? By going to subscription based viewership, they greatly limit the amount of revenue they can bring in as compaired to a 24/7 public access channel. Q on the other hand has known all along that they would air on a subscription only basis, and has been setting up the network accordingly.
Everyone here who owns Q bought into a longshot. People can pump, and people can bash, but in the end none of it means a damn thing. All we can do is ride this one out and see where we end up.
-------------------- Dont buy or sell on my opinions, do your research. Make sure you know what you are buying before you buy.
This is a non reporting pink sheet with very high risk. From high risk comes high rewards. Dont invest more then you can afford to lose. Posts: 4801 | From: Prescott, ON, Canada | Registered: May 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
WHATS WITH THIS REPORT?? Coming out tomorrow in the LA TIMES?? Says Q has 1 million subscribers!!
"The head of one rival TV service said that Viacom risked going too far in its bid to make Logo available to most cable subscribers. "The backlash is coming," said Frank Olsen, president and chief executive of Q Television Network, a private, 11-year-old gay cable outlet with about 1 million subscribers. Olsen said he deliberately made Q a network that customers must specifically order rather than a basic cable channel, which he believes helps protect the service from conservative pressure groups".
posted
That's not right. Frank must have said we have potentially 1 million subscribers, but in our RCN market, only 15,000. Potential = MAX subscribers.
-------------------- As a forum poster, it is ironic that you are held to a higher standard than a Pink Sheet CEO. Posts: 676 | Registered: Apr 2005
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Bigrod40: WHATS WITH THIS REPORT?? Coming out tomorrow in the LA TIMES?? Says Q has 1 million subscribers!!
"The head of one rival TV service said that Viacom risked going too far in its bid to make Logo available to most cable subscribers. "The backlash is coming," said Frank Olsen, president and chief executive of Q Television Network, a private, 11-year-old gay cable outlet with about 1 million subscribers. Olsen said he deliberately made Q a network that customers must specifically order rather than a basic cable channel, which he believes helps protect the service from conservative pressure groups".
if the quote was true that q has one million sub, we would have been over twenty five cents by now. and qtn is not private, is it? however, one day near, we will get to that one million sub mark !
-------------------- Come Q, the kid needs back-to-school shopping! Posts: 734 | Registered: Sep 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
I spent this evening browsing right wing websites. What do you think I found? I found a whole bunch of people who hate the homosexual way of life. Of the 50-75 sites I browsed about 1/2 a dozen of them had LOGO! amongst the top stories. Currently these groups are pissed. The Ten Commandments issue was shot down, gay marriage issues are resurfacing, and the whole homosexualality in schools issue is on fire. I sent about a dozen emails to the more powerfull groups voicing my anger..lol at their inability to battle Viacom on the LOGO! public access launch.
"The Calm Before the Storm" is an appropriate name for this thread because it is about ready to hit full force. However, it has nothing to do with audits, share counts, charts, PR's, or anything else in the world of securities trading and regulation. It has to do with the moral S*%t storm that Viacom is about to create. I am not saying that Q is going to make a run anytime soon. I am saying that we are about to get our chance at playing in the big show. Once we are there, it will be up to Frank and his crew to make the most of it.
Posts: 18 | From: Redlands, CA, 92374 | Registered: Sep 2004
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Zman: I spent this evening browsing right wing websites. What do you think I found? I found a whole bunch of people who hate the homosexual way of life .... "The Calm Before the Storm" is an appropriate name for this thread because it is about ready to hit full force. However, it has nothing to do with audits, share counts, charts, PR's, or anything else in the world of securities trading and regulation. It has to do with the moral S*%t storm that Viacom is about to create. I am not saying that Q is going to make a run anytime soon. I am saying that we are about to get our chance at playing in the big show. Once we are there, it will be up to Frank and his crew to make the most of it.
Zman Welcome. Good information, objective opinions. Thanks.
-------------------- Everything I say is only my opinion ... right or wrong. Posts: 2152 | From: Ohio | Registered: Sep 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
morning qbidians is this going to be a green day or another day to pick up more qbid and cheap prices ? patience pays remember this simple concept.im not placing any gaurantees on qbids success but ive stated many times my full beleif in qtv and ill mention it again.i was in nyc on the eve of sat, and sunday and the city was flooded with gay lesbian transexual and bisexual individuals.i didnt make it to the parade as i had important business to attend to which i was very upset about but what can you do.... i really wanted to go and say hi to some of the q staff and just see them in action.hopefully next time.during the evening i did have the chance to mention to quite a few glbt folks the question "have you heard of qtv" to my surprise many of them said yes but isnt logo launching first. or others said "i cant get that with my cable service where i live but i would like to have it" so frank if you are reading this please do what you can to make it possible for all the folks who sincerely want to watch this type of programming.
welcome aboard zman i like your style keep up the good dd and imput.your thoughts are welcome by me i like to hear both sides of every story so if you have negatives to report please do so as well.
4.5 million long strong accumulating and not for sale. goooooooooooo qqqqqqqqqbid!!!!!
and gentlemen and ladies i may be bluffing about bluffing on an all in at hold em when we get their but i certainly am not bluffing about buying rounds of drinks.so keep the faith and soon we will all be drinking merrily and eating cheese cake.heheheheheh its great to be a true qbidian...........
-------------------- gotta know when to hold em and when to .......... Posts: 1525 | Registered: Mar 2005
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Zman: I spent this evening browsing right wing websites. What do you think I found? I found a whole bunch of people who hate the homosexual way of life. Of the 50-75 sites I browsed about 1/2 a dozen of them had LOGO! amongst the top stories. Currently these groups are pissed. The Ten Commandments issue was shot down, gay marriage issues are resurfacing, and the whole homosexualality in schools issue is on fire. I sent about a dozen emails to the more powerfull groups voicing my anger..lol at their inability to battle Viacom on the LOGO! public access launch.
"The Calm Before the Storm" is an appropriate name for this thread because it is about ready to hit full force. However, it has nothing to do with audits, share counts, charts, PR's, or anything else in the world of securities trading and regulation. It has to do with the moral S*%t storm that Viacom is about to create. I am not saying that Q is going to make a run anytime soon. I am saying that we are about to get our chance at playing in the big show. Once we are there, it will be up to Frank and his crew to make the most of it.
So you want to turn Q into a political agenda and scare off potential advertisers. Brilliant.
Posts: 120 | Registered: Aug 2004
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by noah129: [QB . . . and gentlemen and ladies i may be bluffing about bluffing on an all in at hold em when we get their but i certainly am not bluffing about buying rounds of drinks.so keep the faith and soon we will all be drinking merrily and eating cheese cake.heheheheheh its great to be a true qbidian........... [/QB]
noah I was only bluffing when I asked if you were bluffing about bluffing on an all-in at holdem. LOL.
Looking forward to Vegas . . . and Scotch and cheesecake is starting to sound better all the time.
-------------------- Everything I say is only my opinion ... right or wrong. Posts: 2152 | From: Ohio | Registered: Sep 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
i sent some emails out to a couple of religeous organizations. here is the first reply. i was shocked. even the church is behind this.
Rodney--
Our organization supports gays and lesbians so we would not be intereested in trying to vilify them bu keeping them off of the airwaves. In case you don't know, the Supreme Court repealed all sodomy laws last year, so you really have no grounds to discriminate against them, other than just garden variety homophobia. Your kids are not in any more danger of gay TV than they are of the priests on Mother Angelica's TV network, so I wouldn't worry too much about that. I certainly don't worry about that for my kids.
Regards,
PT
quote:Originally posted by Zman: I spent this evening browsing right wing websites. What do you think I found? I found a whole bunch of people who hate the homosexual way of life. Of the 50-75 sites I browsed about 1/2 a dozen of them had LOGO! amongst the top stories. Currently these groups are pissed. The Ten Commandments issue was shot down, gay marriage issues are resurfacing, and the whole homosexualality in schools issue is on fire. I sent about a dozen emails to the more powerfull groups voicing my anger..lol at their inability to battle Viacom on the LOGO! public access launch.
"The Calm Before the Storm" is an appropriate name for this thread because it is about ready to hit full force. However, it has nothing to do with audits, share counts, charts, PR's, or anything else in the world of securities trading and regulation. It has to do with the moral S*%t storm that Viacom is about to create. I am not saying that Q is going to make a run anytime soon. I am saying that we are about to get our chance at playing in the big show. Once we are there, it will be up to Frank and his crew to make the most of it.
-------------------- Dont buy or sell on my opinions, do your research. Make sure you know what you are buying before you buy.
This is a non reporting pink sheet with very high risk. From high risk comes high rewards. Dont invest more then you can afford to lose. Posts: 4801 | From: Prescott, ON, Canada | Registered: May 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
Zman, I'm am also going to have to disagree a little bit. Unlike Newbie suggested, I don't think advertisers would be effected in the long run, I'm sure they would wait until the "dust cleared" and then race back to this untapped market. It is a valid concern though.
Where I disagree is in the disregard for the need to request Q from cable providers. I agree the negative publicity could criple LOGO, but I worry Here would benefit more than Q (realize I say this not knowing what the difference in programming will be between the two). Here is owned by DirectTV and is a hybrid PPV/subscriptin channel, almost untouchable to the FCC. They are established and have the potential to reach 44 million people I believe (correct me if that number is of a few mil). They have been on the air the longest and have the claim of being the first.
Q needs requests, as it was posted on the "Subscription Info" section of their website for quite some time. I agree with everything you have said, but also believe Q will need to stir up demand (through shareholders and/or interested consumers) to be offered by many of the major cable/satellite providers.
-------------------- Still holding, Still waiting, ...
Don't forget to send your letter to Echostar/DISH Network. 20 letters a day gets Q some play :) Posts: 621 | Registered: Jun 2005
| IP: Logged |
-------------------- Dont buy or sell on my opinions, do your research. Make sure you know what you are buying before you buy.
This is a non reporting pink sheet with very high risk. From high risk comes high rewards. Dont invest more then you can afford to lose. Posts: 4801 | From: Prescott, ON, Canada | Registered: May 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
Canada Lawmakers Approve Gay Marriage Bill! Today's news in Yahoo..Q's connection with the Canadian market should be utilized. The time is ripe for this market and Q is positioned well. Holding long. No stars for the Cowboy. IMHO.
Posts: 105 | From: "Western", NY USA | Registered: Aug 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
Thanks penny. I try to be decent, although it's tough when BottomLiner tries to get me to chase women with him in Vegas. haha. Will I lose my stars?
quote:Originally posted by Penny-Trader: ill give you 5 POLO
you seem to be a decent type lol
Rod
-------------------- Still holding, Still waiting, ...
Don't forget to send your letter to Echostar/DISH Network. 20 letters a day gets Q some play :) Posts: 621 | Registered: Jun 2005
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by polo1110: Thanks penny. I try to be decent, although it's tough when BottomLiner tries to get me to chase women with him in Vegas. haha. Will I lose my stars? lol. Rod
polo If Penny takes back your stars, I will replace them. However, the stars we give you aren't important. It's how many stars those Vegas women award you that really counts.
-------------------- Everything I say is only my opinion ... right or wrong. Posts: 2152 | From: Ohio | Registered: Sep 2004
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Penny-Trader: i sent some emails out to a couple of religeous organizations. here is the first reply. i was shocked. even the church is behind this.
Rodney--
Our organization supports gays and lesbians so we would not be intereested in trying to vilify them bu keeping them off of the airwaves. In case you don't know, the Supreme Court repealed all sodomy laws last year, so you really have no grounds to discriminate against them, other than just garden variety homophobia. Your kids are not in any more danger of gay TV than they are of the priests on Mother Angelica's TV network, so I wouldn't worry too much about that. I certainly don't worry about that for my kids.
Regards,
PT
quote:Originally posted by Zman: I spent this evening browsing right wing websites. What do you think I found? I found a whole bunch of people who hate the homosexual way of life. Of the 50-75 sites I browsed about 1/2 a dozen of them had LOGO! amongst the top stories. Currently these groups are pissed. The Ten Commandments issue was shot down, gay marriage issues are resurfacing, and the whole homosexualality in schools issue is on fire. I sent about a dozen emails to the more powerfull groups voicing my anger..lol at their inability to battle Viacom on the LOGO! public access launch.
"The Calm Before the Storm" is an appropriate name for this thread because it is about ready to hit full force. However, it has nothing to do with audits, share counts, charts, PR's, or anything else in the world of securities trading and regulation. It has to do with the moral S*%t storm that Viacom is about to create. I am not saying that Q is going to make a run anytime soon. I am saying that we are about to get our chance at playing in the big show. Once we are there, it will be up to Frank and his crew to make the most of it.
By the way, there were more than 15 church groups in the gay pride parade.
Posts: 809 | From: NYC | Registered: Feb 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
Not just church groups, actual churches. They were giving out stuff like stickers that said “God made me gay”. I also saw a huge wooden cross with a huge gay flag draped around it.
Posts: 809 | From: NYC | Registered: Feb 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
If I'm within 10 feet of those Vegas women I'm sure "the girlfriend" will have me seeing enough stars to replace my lost ones. lol
quote:Originally posted by Bottomliner:
quote:Originally posted by polo1110: Thanks penny. I try to be decent, although it's tough when BottomLiner tries to get me to chase women with him in Vegas. haha. Will I lose my stars? lol. Rod
polo If Penny takes back your stars, I will replace them. However, the stars we give you aren't important. It's how many stars those Vegas women award you that really counts.
-------------------- Still holding, Still waiting, ...
Don't forget to send your letter to Echostar/DISH Network. 20 letters a day gets Q some play :) Posts: 621 | Registered: Jun 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
take stars from you for THAT???? no way ill give you another 5 if you let me join you lol
Rod
quote:Originally posted by polo1110: Thanks penny. I try to be decent, although it's tough when BottomLiner tries to get me to chase women with him in Vegas. haha. Will I lose my stars?
quote:Originally posted by Penny-Trader: ill give you 5 POLO
you seem to be a decent type lol
Rod
-------------------- Dont buy or sell on my opinions, do your research. Make sure you know what you are buying before you buy.
This is a non reporting pink sheet with very high risk. From high risk comes high rewards. Dont invest more then you can afford to lose. Posts: 4801 | From: Prescott, ON, Canada | Registered: May 2004
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Penny-Trader: take stars from you for THAT???? no way ill give you another 5 if you let me join you lol
Rod
quote:Originally posted by polo1110: Thanks penny. I try to be decent, although it's tough when BottomLiner tries to get me to chase women with him in Vegas. haha. Will I lose my stars?
quote:Originally posted by Penny-Trader: ill give you 5 POLO
you seem to be a decent type lol
Rod
-------------------- Still holding, Still waiting, ...
Don't forget to send your letter to Echostar/DISH Network. 20 letters a day gets Q some play :) Posts: 621 | Registered: Jun 2005
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by polo1110: If I'm within 10 feet of those Vegas women I'm sure "the girlfriend" will have me seeing enough stars to replace my lost ones. lol
polo Good point. My wife would react the same way.
Like most men, I talk a lot about "straying", but I always remember the quote from actor Paul Newman when he was asked why his marriage to Joanne Woodward had lasted so long. He said something like:
"Why would I go out for a hamburger when I have filet mignon at home?"
To get my comments back to stocks, I still consider QBID to be the filet mignon of GLBT television. It isn't quite ready to eat, but I don't want Frank to turn up the heat just because I'm hungry.
-------------------- Everything I say is only my opinion ... right or wrong. Posts: 2152 | From: Ohio | Registered: Sep 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
have we gone qbonkers ? hahaha well folks im not sure what the heck is going on all the news seems great all the rumors seem dandy i want more q shares and it seems like the rubberband is at its breaking point where its either gonna fly or break snapping the ones holding it.you all know that i beleive this rubberband will fly but my only question to those that feel they are intuitive is can i buy for .0016 soon or is that just a dream.i want to buy more today but ive become a bit cheap and want in at the best price available.any input would be welcome provided no news what is the technical analysis of this stock supposed to do.i know you chartists are out their are we going to .0016 first or back to .002's.
-------------------- gotta know when to hold em and when to .......... Posts: 1525 | Registered: Mar 2005
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by noah129: have we gone qbonkers ? hahaha
noah Probably . . . but we're having fun, right?
I also am trying to pick up some cheap shares before the next run. I have no doubt a PPS spike is coming, but I don't know if it will be the sustained run we all want to see. Depends on what prompts the spike, I guess. I won't try to guess when it will happen either. I'll just wait for Frank to do whatever needs done. I still have faith in him. If I didn't, I would be long gone.
-------------------- Everything I say is only my opinion ... right or wrong. Posts: 2152 | From: Ohio | Registered: Sep 2004
| IP: Logged |
Topic Closed
UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!
Printer-friendly view of this topic
![[Eek!]](eek.gif)
WHATS WITH THIS REPORT?? Coming out tomorrow in the LA TIMES?? Says Q has 1 million subscribers!!![[Cool]](cool.gif)
