Allstocks.com's Bulletin Board Post New Topic  New Poll  Post A Reply
my profile login | register | search | faq | forum home

  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Allstocks.com's Bulletin Board » Micro Penny Stocks, Penny Stocks $0.10 & Under » CMKX - May 10 - 05 D-Day - The next chapter (Page 84)

 - UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!   This topic comprises 87 pages: 1  2  3  ...  81  82  83  84  85  86  87   
Author Topic: CMKX - May 10 - 05 D-Day - The next chapter
bill1352
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for bill1352     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
mydogsky...these ppl think $1 trillion is undervalued. there is 1 moron that thinks the pps of cmkx will be .34 by next week. just about everyone at pb32 thinks the guy is a nut case tho even the ones that think CIM will IPO at $20.

--------------------
"keep your stick on the ice & your cup firmly in place"

Posts: 3651 | From: Algonac, MI. 48001 | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
stockster5
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for stockster5     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Here's alittle something for the koolaid crowd who thinks these company officers actually
care about little piddling shareholders... Correct me if I'm wrong, but no certs no voting power???
But these links shows what a huge amount of "officers" are doing with the penny and sub-penny
players ...(us, me and you) An ungodly amount of companies follow these examples, which I think proves that penny/micro penny stocks are really just day trader vehicles and you shouldn't spend more than you can afford to lose. These 'owners' exp: UC, know what 90% of the traders know...90% don't expect their investment back...that's right, something like 90% penny traders lose...but traders look for that 10% to make some cash. I think it's all in the leverage, 500 bucks at .0001 gets you 5 million shares so all you need is a .0001 move to make cash. It's out there, it works, otherwise this market wouldn't exist. But to hold a micro penny stock for months, years...
Expecially when the company is in front of the sec courts, repeatialy, is just plain foolish. Take some time and look at these links, then read the sec letter below. Then tell me ... koolaider's ... that you don't see the pattern here.... jeeze.
Here's another tip... If a company relocates it's incorporation to Nevada AND changes it's name, run away, run very far away from that urge to invest in that horsechit........................unless
of course you just invest a couple hundred to get out next week after the next false sec report comes out to pop the pps artifically to draw in the new uninformed traders.......!!
And oh yea... this company below hasn't been heard from since May 9th 2004, why in the world is
it still trading and with whom????
S5

http://www.sec.gov/litigation/complaints/comp17971.htm
http://www.biospace.com/b2/news_company.cfm?CompanyID=228604

U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 8-K
CURRENT REPORT
PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): May 6, 2004
-----------
INTERNATIONAL BIOCHEMICAL INDUSTRIES, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Georgia
(State or jurisdiction of incorporation
or organization)
0-24913
(Commission File Number
58-2181628
--------------------------------------
(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number
120 South Houghton Road, Suite #138-308, Tucson, Arizona 85748
--------------------------------------------------------------
(Address of principal executive offices)
Registrant's telephone number: (520) 844-1005
(Former name or former address, if changed since last report)
ITEM 5. OTHER EVENTS. AND
ITEM 9. REGULATION FD DISCLOSURE.
(a) Immediately after the filing of this Form 8-K on this date, Milo
Bergeson will resign as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant,
and Gary Wagnon will resign as Secretary/Treasurer of the Registrant. All
directors of the Registrant had previously resigned on January 17, 2004 (as
reported in a Form 8-K filed on January 28, 2004).
(b) It has come to the attention of the Registrant that that the United
States Attorney's Office is conducting a grand jury investigation. Theinvestigation relates
to a series of press releases issued by the registrant in
early 2003.
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on
its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
INTERNATIONAL BIOCHEMICAL INDUSTRIES, INC.
Dated: May 6, 2004 By: /s/ Milo Bergeson
Milo Bergeson, President/CEO

--------------------
Eagles may soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines....

Posts: 400 | From: Jupiter, somewhere out there | Registered: Jun 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
stockster5
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for stockster5     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
The above company was pulled at random from a random investment board, listed only in alphabetical order....think about those odds....
S5

--------------------
Eagles may soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines....

Posts: 400 | From: Jupiter, somewhere out there | Registered: Jun 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
bill1352
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for bill1352     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
ILLEGAL SHORT SELLING SPECIAL THIS SUNDAY
« Thread Started on Yesterday at 9:06pm »

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From Gemm Board
http://ragingbull.lycos.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=GEMM&read=9188


TWO HOUR ILLEGAL SHORT SELLING SPECIAL THIS SUNDAY

JOHN O’QUINN’S LEAD LITIGATOR ON ILLEGAL SHORT SELLING, WES CHRISTIAN, WILL DISCLOSE THE LATEST WINNING DECISIONS IN COURT AND THE SEC AND WILL DISCUSS WHAT HE BELIEVE’S IS A TRILLION DOLLAR DAMAGE MODEL FOR COMMON SHAREHOLDERS!!! PLEASE HELP ME GET THE WORD OUT FOR INTERESTED SHAREHOLDERS TO CALL IN LIVE AND TOLL FREE AT “1 866 606 TALK” ON SUNDAY NIGHT FROM 9-11 ET OR LISTEN IN AT WWW.BUSINESSTALKRADIO.NET OR ON THEIR LOCAL RADIO STATION---THIS WILL BE A BIG SHOW WITH LOTS OF NEW INFORMATION!

--------------------
"keep your stick on the ice & your cup firmly in place"

Posts: 3651 | From: Algonac, MI. 48001 | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Ric
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Ric     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
One thing I think is funny about the NSS issue a couple weeks ago when the German Chancellor talked about the problem in the US, is that the Berlin Exchange is one of the biggest problems. If the Germany is so worried about this problem then why don't they fix part of the problem from there own borders. Obviously the US government could care less. Yet we keep electing the same azzholes back into office each time. Our country is going to continue to go downhill and not lesson to the people as long as we keep hitting the same button everytime in the voting booth.

--------------------
Invest with your brain not with your heart.

Posts: 4405 | From: Bristol, Tn, USA | Registered: Aug 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
tic_toc
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for tic_toc     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
heres a cracking post from pb32 about the latest rumour ...

Is this the summer of 04 or 05. Last summer, I was reminded by my fiance that I sat and listened to sterling speculation on July 4th while my fiance was on the back porch watching fireworks. This year, I disconnected my telephone line at home (use only cell, to avoid going online at home), and now have forced my way into using mobile web with verizon wireless for $5 a month to keep up with my CMKX stories. I almost bought the palm at verizon so that I could here paltalk in the car.

On a sidebar, I hope these rumors come true. Give me one of them and I will be dancing at my local bank on the tellers station ledge. I like this kind of stuff to hear but this is what makes me stick to CMKX like glue. I feel I am on the titanic, waters filling up the boat at a feverish pace, and Capt Urban says on the loudspeaker, "dont bother getting a life raft, we will fix the gaping hole" and then a stewardess named andy is running around telling people "all is under control" and the boat will be floating and water removed shortly, just to be patient and trust. We will see folks. There is a big conspiracy, Im just not sure if its the law enforcement/money making bunch or if its within my own family.

Time will tell, stay the course, shortly, soon, Be patient, If your in you win, If you doubt get on out, Its specolation, Its the stock play of a lifetime, All is well, Success is at hand, so far I have lost over 100K and so all this stuff is well and good but unless my slot machine chachings then its soundbytes and hot air. Oh, I forgot, you dont lose until you sell, Thats why I aint selling. Why sell when my 25k left in this stock, can afford me the same opportunity when it was worth 600k. So I am in it forever, I am married to this stock, gray hairs and sleepless nights, and finger biting and finger pointing, the saga continues, thats my andy rooney.

Posts: 768 | From: Ingland | Registered: May 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
dwman
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for dwman     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by legaleagle:
quote:
Originally posted by Wallace#1:
"The Owners Group's core argument (both in this motion and its other pleadings) seems to be that this court should maintain the liquidity of CMKM Diamonds' stock (by refusing the Division's revocation request) so that current shareholders may retain the option of selling their holdings to unsuspecting members of the investing public," Ms. Hakala says."
---------------

Exactly what I have been saying in more ways than one for over a year....not about revocation but about the aims of the cult members in general.

Evil cult members, lurking about, waiting for some unsuspecting single mom to bring her milk money to the exchange, or a poverty sticken widow to put her last $100 in the market. Yep, ya got us all figured out Wallace. But the market is, and has been, open on CMKX, yet very few sales. Doesn't seem to be any rush to unload.
legal, could it be that my friend wallace is losing his objectivity? I thought the core argument of the attorney for OG is "this stock is illegally shorted by thugs and needs to be dealt with".

wallace, I just got a truckload of sears catalogs and have a few extra corn cobs. I think you will soon need them. lol

Posts: 1005 | From: Grapevine, TX 76051 | Registered: Aug 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
legaleagle
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for legaleagle     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
DR D Report 007/06/05


Topic: Per my conversation with Lori Livingston etc... (Read 1,607 times)
DrDiamond
Global Moderator

member is offline


Dr.D and Ron Casavant


Joined: Aug 2004
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,055
Location: Kentucky
Per my conversation with Lori Livingston etc...
« Thread Started on Today at 12:43am »

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Per conversation with Lori Livingston, President and CEO of Transfer Online.com

I spoke with Mrs. Livingston for around 40 minutes. We discussed the letters she had sent to the SEC and the DTCC. We spoke extensively concerning the developing regulations limiting Transfer Agents participation in companies withdrawing from the DTC, dematerilaization, NSS/Counterfeiting, electronic shares vs certificates, STP (Straight through processing), and more.

Mrs. Livingston was very cooperative and assisted greatly in answering many of my questions. Too, she was a very nice, well spoken, independent and intelligent woman to communicate with. She knew her stuff, for sure!
She works with many overseas companies as well as U.S. companies. She granted permission to use her letters or any parts of them for whatever purpose I desired. She suggested when communicating with our legislators that I simply incorporate what she said into my letters or communications so those reading will regard the information more highly than a letter from someone outside the state or area of representation.

I will share some of her comments here regarding the state of the market system, in her opinion of course.

The market system has spent 20 years in trying to make the market operations a complete mystery and have been in a process of making shareholders ignorant of what is really going on in the marketing world. As a part of that broker/dealers have been misinforming their clients to keep them in the dark concerning their true options and rights as shareholders. Many brokers deny the existence of Direct Registration of your security; neglect to share with clients information about the availability to hold their position in paper certificates; they place exhorbitant fees on the obtaining of certificates and in turn blame the high cost and lengthy time delays on the Transfer Agent.

Concerning dematerialization (the removal of paper stock certificates) she informed that the States Laws in the UCC (May be the Uniform Commercial Code) regulates the issuing and use of securities by laws that address Paper certificates not electronic broker statements. She is not sure how dematerialization will ever be pulled off, unless the markets are going to be operating completely outside the parameters of the States Laws. There is no provision anywhere in the State’s UCC that gives any governance, guidance, preference, or even recognition to a broker statement upholding any legitimacy of lawful ownership of a security. Her summation of paper certificates vs electronic shares being that broker statements were not worth the paper they were written on when it comes to court cases and company recognition. She added that NO ONE presenting a "broker statement" for their position in a company's security to a transfer agent or company would be recognized as legal ownership. It is only recognized by the broker that issued it and his contacts.

Mrs. Lori Livingston has served as an expert witness at trials and court cases over the years. She said that the first thing you had to do in the courtroom is to educate/school the Judge presiding over the case exactly what takes place in the market system and how it all works. In her expertise she readily stated that 99% of the time Paper Certificate holders are in the driver’s seat when it comes to trials and court cases. A broker statement means absolutely nothing to the Judge, a Transfer Agent, or the company the security is held on. There is no law anywhere that gives any value to a “broker statement” except the value agreed upon with that broker that the client entered agreement with.

We also entertained the idea of possibly being able to reroute around the DTC and form a market system that functions fully outside the reaches of the DTCC, NSCC, etc... In our discussions about an alternative to the DTC being formed if we could ever get enough companies interested and/or involved, Mrs. Livingston stated that she already had the software and equipment in place to get things rolling. These are in her possession as they assist her in fulfilling her roll as an Transfer Agent.

She agrees with my thoughts, as well as most of yours, that the DTC is a monopoly which is against our laws. The DTC accumulated the opposing Depository Trusts that were competing which obviously gave it a clear cut monopoly.

The DTCC which has already became a monopoly on the Depository industry is now attempting to move into a monopoly for clearing, settling, and seizing hold of the transfer agents function as well.

Mrs. Livingston had previously worked for a company that had both a Broker and a Transfer Agency Division and they were required to keep them completely separated. It appears that the DTC is trying to be both broker and T/A wrapped up in one. This would make the gathering or obtaining of information from them nearly impossible as it already is.

Mrs. Livingston stated that there are basically 2 groups of T/A’s
The Wall Street Giants that could care less about paper certificates or STP as they have revenue generating avenues from all sources
and
The Individual Agents that are trying to perform a vital service and mainly focused on the Transfer Agent business.

Mrs. Livingston added that the average transfer agency is uniformly quiet to regulatory developments as they are fearful of drawing scrutiny from the SEC or the DTCC. As we all know, the squeaky wheel gets greased and that is not always a good thing.

(NOTE: As a matter of note, remember Mrs. Lori Livingston was notified after her letters of concern to the SEC and the DTCC about “dematerialization” and the DTCC’s directional push of being the Transfer Agent for the country, that her company, Transfer Online Inc. was being “audited”. Go figure!)

In closing I believe we have a lot of friends that are very aware of what is transpiring in the market system and from the regulators regarding CMKX.

I still believe the company could furnish the filings and all of this revocation stuff would go away. It doesn't appear at this time they are "capable" of submitting the filings. I say that, because I firmly believe if they could then they would. I understand that Mr. Levine had documents that he was sent to be audited and he had 250 some odd pages of papers to turn in when he left and that the first 3 quarters of 2002 were already covered in the filings. I believe I am aware of most all of the scenarios that could be, should be concerning the filing of the necessary reports to settle the Administrative Hearings issues for CMKX.
What is still outstanding is that they haven't filed and if they don't then they will probably get revoked. If they do get revoked the obvious solution is to 1st file an "appeal". If you stll can't file the reports by the end of the "appeals process", then I think you need to shut her down, accept the revocation, get some one in there that can get the job done one way or another, then either file the Form 10 to reregister or roll everything over into another comapny.

A revocation only suspends the trading of the securities as they would no longer be registered, but it does not do away with the assets of the company nor does it do away with the shareholders stake in those assets. A revocation is not bankruptcy!

I believe the company is taking the steps that they can take at this stage of the game and when they are finished with the reports, as I do believe they will accomplish the task within the next 45 days, then they will utilize whatever options are available to them at that time.

Before I close I thought it would be fitting to sharew with you information that was passed on to me from a trusted source. It has to do with Ameritrade and their treating of securities that are deemed to be worthless by either the company, the transfer agent, the regulators, or the courts.

Here is the email:

Thank you for contacting us today regarding CMKX. Positions held in your account remain there for holding or negotiating at the discretion of the account holder(s). Ameritrade would remove a position from a client's account without client request if the shares have been deemed null and void by the company, transfer agent, regulators, or the courts. This removal could include a liquidation, an exchange, redemption, or no redemption at all. Although we do not have any bearing on whether this determination would ever be made, we will act in accordance to the above parties if the position is no longer valid. There is not a cost associated with holding positions that no longer trade or when a position is removed on a mandatory basis due to delisting or revocation If you wish, you can request a certificate be issued in your account name for your position. In this case, if the position is deemed null and void, you can continue to hold the certificate, even if it may have no value or recognition at that time. If you have further concerns or inquiries, please reply to this message.
Sincerely, Joy Busse
Reorganization and Safekeeping,
Ameritrade Division of Ameritrade, Inc.

Make of it what you will, but I would suggest everyone make contact with your broker before any decision is handed down and make sure that the broker understands what you want done with your CMKX position in case of a revocation from the Judge. I am just asking everyone to be safe and know your options before any scenario could develop and these broker/dealers that are out there start deleting positions.

For the record, I don't believe the SEC proved its case to get a revocation. I don't believe the Judge "should" revoke CMKX because of the shareholdrs, the effort, the money spent, the assets, the progress reportedly made, etc... I do believe a suspension should be handed down with a definite time limit to provide the filings. I would expect 45-90 days should be sufficient. With all of that said, I still believe if the company doesn't file something and show progress then this Judge will revoke. JMHO

These were not attempts to give exact quotes from Mrs. Livingston and I have shared with you what I believe she has communicated to me. These are all just my opinions and I do hope that you treat them as such.

I do believe success is at hand.

Dr.D

Posts: 2375 | Registered: Nov 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
dwman
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for dwman     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
[QUOTE]Originally posted by stockster5:
[QB] Here's alittle something for the koolaid crowd who thinks these company officers actually
care about little piddling shareholders... Correct me if I'm wrong, but no certs no voting power???

Wrong!! I have never pulled certs on a stock before and have voted by proxy once or twice. Normally I toss the proxy material.

Posts: 1005 | From: Grapevine, TX 76051 | Registered: Aug 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
ed19363
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for ed19363     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Know what I dont understand?
If CMKX has ANY filings ready, even if it is only for ONE QUARTER two years ago, WHY DONT THEY FILE IT. It is very hard to believe that after two years they have absolutely NOTHING ready.
One small filing might be seen as an effort to get up-to-date to the judge, and may sway her decision.
IMO the company is acting in a wildly stupid manner.

--------------------
If I give you bad information, please feel free to sue me. I have nothing left anyway.
Ed

Posts: 1772 | From: Oxford, PA, USA | Registered: Oct 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
dwman
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for dwman     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Ric:
CIM can only IPO through the SEC. I love how they feel the SEC will approve that, lol.

ric... I don't believe cim will ipo but if their papers were in order and they met the requirements for going to a board, on what grounds can the sec prevent it? The SEC has guidelines too... granted, it seems, they rarely follow them.
Posts: 1005 | From: Grapevine, TX 76051 | Registered: Aug 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
dwman
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for dwman     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Dustoff101:
dwman, goodnight new friend....When are ya gonna stop blowing holes in that Texas ground!

Don't ya know your a floating on oil!

Somebody shot a 16 ton black Bear the other day..

That dern Bear fell outa a 600 ft Douglas Fir tree....

Caused a 5 on the rickter scale..

The Bear started a rolling down the mountain
and created a huge clear cut...

The judge gave the hunter a ticket for illegal clear cut logging....

Last I heard, the Bear was bein turned into sun dried jerky.

They used the clear cut to finish the deed, damn near filled up all 720 acres of that clear cut with drying meat!

The Tuna are running, standby for report...

Did get high centered on a Gold nugget while driving on the beach at Gold Beach OR........Guess I'll have to raise the old truck up another 12ft....

Those damn nuggets block the beach and make it difficult to get where I dig clams!!

Want to hear about the clams?

lol dusty... actually my land sits atop the Barnett shale which is a large natural gas deposit.
Posts: 1005 | From: Grapevine, TX 76051 | Registered: Aug 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
dwman
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for dwman     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Yes dusty... the clams, the clams... tell me about them.
Posts: 1005 | From: Grapevine, TX 76051 | Registered: Aug 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
legaleagle
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for legaleagle     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
FRIZZELL LAW FIRM
305 S. Broadway, Suite 302
Tyler, Texas 75702
(903)595-1921
E-Mail jmartin@cmkxownersgroup.com


Dear Group Members, July 6, 2005


John Martin is out of the office and will return on Friday. He is out of town on CMKX business so hold your calls until Friday if you wish to speak to him. He may be able to return some emails but I understand there are some problems with his remote hookup. Many of you have visited with my legal assistant Goldie Norris in the last few months. She is taking the remainder of the week off for a long scheduled vacation. She is very dedicated and very loyal and expressed her concerns about being out of the office the remainder of this week. Her vacation has been planned for quite sometime. You will see below that I am working on some other matters which will prevent me from taking calls at least until tomorrow. Any calls that come to the office may be answered by temporary help or call notes. All messages will be forwarded to me.

I am currently “encouraging” the company and the SEC to enter into formal settlement discussions before we receive a ruling by Judge Murray. I plan on asking the Judge (by written motion if necessary) to allow us time to explore all options before she rules. Judge Murray has indicated she will rule by July 17. I am hopeful we will be given the benefit of the next week or so to try to come to some agreement. The issues in these settlement discussions are not terribly complicated but I am not convinced the company and the SEC have fully discussed all avenues of settlement at this point. Phone conferences are planned this morning with the company.

There has been discussion about appealing any adverse ruling by the court and continuing our work on the financials during the appeals process. Although we may be resigned to this fate, I am adamantly opposed to such unless we have fully explored all other options. I have made myself clear to the company about our position.

I am convinced that work is continuing on the financials. It is my understanding that there will be some announcements about the new auditor any day now. There were tentative plans for me to be in Fort Lauderdale tomorrow, Ecuador over the weekend and Canada next week. I have told Urban that I will not be going to Ecuador or to Canada until we have exhausted every avenue to avoid deregistration. I have also cancelled my trip to Fort Lauderdale to meet with the Eagletech people tomorrow. I plan to reschedule this meeting as well.

The court has entered an order striking the portions of my brief referring to naked short selling. Her ruling denies the admission of SH Exhibit 1. It is apparent she will not consider our evidence of naked shorting in her ruling. I will have this order posted this afternoon.

We are continuing to gather shareholder statements and adding the numbers to our total. This remains critical evidence as I meet with other parties (mostly politician types and law enforcement types). I have met formally with a non local office of the FBI. A meeting with the Department of Justice is being arranged.

I will report to you the progress of any settlement talks as soon as I am able.


Onward,


Bill

Posts: 2375 | Registered: Nov 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Wallace#1
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Wallace#1         Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by dwman:
[QUOTE]Originally posted by stockster5:
[QB] Here's alittle something for the koolaid crowd who thinks these company officers actually
care about little piddling shareholders... Correct me if I'm wrong, but no certs no voting power???

Wrong!! I have never pulled certs on a stock before and have voted by proxy once or twice. Normally I toss the proxy material.

stockster,

Dwman is 100% correct. Your broker is required to pass the voting right on to you even if the stock is in street name. Don't remember if the broker can vote it if you decline to vote it.

dwman,

How are you doing my friend. Miss your correcting my grammar...the occasional times I make a mistake. LOL Get back here where where you belong instead of staying with those weird cult forums!!!

Posts: 3607 | From: NJ - Outside Phila. | Registered: Mar 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
legaleagle
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for legaleagle     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by ed19363:
Know what I dont understand?
If CMKX has ANY filings ready, even if it is only for ONE QUARTER two years ago, WHY DONT THEY FILE IT. It is very hard to believe that after two years they have absolutely NOTHING ready.
One small filing might be seen as an effort to get up-to-date to the judge, and may sway her decision.
IMO the company is acting in a wildly stupid manner.

Good question ed. Actually their lack of filing anything gives you an answer. The lack of IRS enforcement tells me they have been filing their taxes alright. That requires financial records and statements. So why haven't they filed prior years............THEY WANT TO BE REVOKED.

But why would they want to be revoked? That's the $64 question right now. NO, keeping evidence of criminal activity by Urban is not the answer. This company has been turned inside out by investigators, and all they can find is a failure to file. This maneuver to be revoked is tactical. It was made before the 15C was reversed. If they wanted to cover for Urban they wouldn't have opened that door. The best explanation I have heard is that they want to "lock in" the naked short. If permanently revoked, NO ONE can trade again. No one, can cover their naked short position. But who really knows why, we can only wait and see. But it is obvious, if they don't get in their filings very quickly, they want to be revoked.

Posts: 2375 | Registered: Nov 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
WinsumLosesum
Member


Icon 1 posted      Profile for WinsumLosesum     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by legaleagle:
FRIZZELL LAW FIRM
... I have told Urban that I will not be going to Ecuador or to Canada until we have exhausted every avenue to avoid deregistration...

So, IF this is true, then we can cross off the "CMKX WANTS to get revoked" theory, right?
Posts: 1872 | From: right here | Registered: Apr 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
ed19363
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for ed19363     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
I'm tired...all I can add is:


9 DTG

--------------------
If I give you bad information, please feel free to sue me. I have nothing left anyway.
Ed

Posts: 1772 | From: Oxford, PA, USA | Registered: Oct 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
bill1352
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for bill1352     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
not sure about no criminal actions on UC's part legal. not just saying this from a basher stand point either. two things stand out. 1) hakala mentioned she had evidence of some questionable trades in her opening remarks i think it was. she stated that because this case was about filing only she didn't bring that evidence. what she was refering too we dont know but with the amount of shares dumped into the market it may not be good. 2) this is 1 that i would think even the cult would be screaming for answers. remember hakala's questioning of the last cmkx woman, the young lawyer about a $60 million gem purchase in december of 2004. this wasn't the infamous jade buy back in 2003 this was a new one. yet there was only the info it was bought. no info on what, how it was paid for other then company money (had to be or it wouldn't be on company books) & it was only rumored that it was canceled. nobody told shareholders about such a buy. this is late 2004, after the SEC contacted cmkx lawyers about the form 15. also it was well after UC made so many comments about being close to filing yet no more info then there was a deal in place for this gem buy.

--------------------
"keep your stick on the ice & your cup firmly in place"

Posts: 3651 | From: Algonac, MI. 48001 | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
legaleagle
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for legaleagle     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by WinsumLosesum:
quote:
Originally posted by legaleagle:
FRIZZELL LAW FIRM
... I have told Urban that I will not be going to Ecuador or to Canada until we have exhausted every avenue to avoid deregistration...

So, IF this is true, then we can cross off the "CMKX WANTS to get revoked" theory, right?
Winsum, I don't see the connection. CMKX may want to be revoked for it's own reasons. They will continue with their plan regardless of what the OG and their attorney says. CMKX knows more about what is going on behind the scenes, than the Frizzell does. They won't let his opinions or wishes interfere with what they know to be the best course for the company and the shareholders.
Posts: 2375 | Registered: Nov 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
legaleagle
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for legaleagle     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by bill1352:
not sure about no criminal actions on UC's part legal. not just saying this from a basher stand point either. two things stand out. 1) hakala mentioned she had evidence of some questionable trades in her opening remarks i think it was. she stated that because this case was about filing only she didn't bring that evidence. what she was refering too we dont know but with the amount of shares dumped into the market it may not be good. 2) this is 1 that i would think even the cult would be screaming for answers. remember hakala's questioning of the last cmkx woman, the young lawyer about a $60 million gem purchase in december of 2004. this wasn't the infamous jade buy back in 2003 this was a new one. yet there was only the info it was bought. no info on what, how it was paid for other then company money (had to be or it wouldn't be on company books) & it was only rumored that it was canceled. nobody told shareholders about such a buy. this is late 2004, after the SEC contacted cmkx lawyers about the form 15. also it was well after UC made so many comments about being close to filing yet no more info then there was a deal in place for this gem buy.

Bill, no one knows what gem purchase she was talking about. But shareholders are not screaming because the purchase of a precious gem collection may be just what the company needs.

What would you do with, oh, say 150 million dollars. Put it in a bank? Put it in the DTCC controlled, stock market? LOL Personally I would put it in gold, silver, precious gems. I think that would be a smart investment on the company's part.

If I were a crook, as so many here think that Urban is, I wouldn't run such a purchase through the company's books. Quite the contrary, Urban still sees CMKX as a viable, operational diamond exploration company, worthy of such an investement. And it must be, or he wouldn't have had $60 million to invest for the company.

So what you are trying to do here.....place doubt in shareholders minds, rather only enforces our concept that CMKX is a well financed, operational company, with surpluses that it needs to invest in the company's future. That reinforces my faith in CMKX and Urban's management decisions.

Posts: 2375 | Registered: Nov 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
legaleagle
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for legaleagle     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
CHECK OUT THE SIMILARITIES BETWEEN THIS COMPANY AND CMKX, AND HOW IT IS HANDLING THE PROBLEM. SOUND FAMILIAR?


MIAMI, June 22, 2005 (PRIMEZONE) -- Telatinos Inc. (TLND), a Latin American-based communications service provider, today announced that the controlling shareholders and Board of Directors have ratified that the "springing option" on the Contacting division of the Company has been exercised by the Holders of the springing option. The resulting action removes the majority of all revenues to a privately held corporation. The Company and its common shareholders remain minority shareholders of IPXES Inc. The Company's proprietary technologies and all other assets and liabilities will remain in Telatinos Inc.

The Company, its officers, directors and U.S. consultants were formally examined by SEC officials for integrity and transparency earlier this year. Significant due diligence in the form of all the Company's books, board minutes and corporate agreements including but not limited to; notarized, executed confirmed purchase orders were provided. The SEC is not seeking further information from the Company, its officers, directors or consultants.

Telatinos president Rodrigo Calderon stated, "The U.S. OTC and unregulated stock markets have proven to me and my colleagues that the rules and regulations governing both fully reporting and non reporting companies continue to be wildly skewed in favor of offshore hedge funds and rogue market markers. Therefore, we are removing the Company's most valuable asset from the dangers of unlimited, counterfeit dilution and the most savage stock manipulation we have ever witnessed. The Company is seeking additional information from authorities in the USA, Isle of Man and Turks & Caicos regarding specific entities who have seemingly traded extremely large amounts of the Company's common stock, yet do not appear on the Company's NOBO lists. The Company has instigated with the assistance of U.S. authorities, an investigation of activities of certain individuals whose trading activity has tenuously been linked to thousands of message board and bulletin board postings concerning the Company. We look forward to a speedy resolution to these issues."
http://money.excite.com/jsp/nw/nwdt_ge.jsp?news_id=pzn-80378&feed=pzn&date=20050622

Posts: 2375 | Registered: Nov 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Ric
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Ric     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Everyone did also notice in Frizzel's letter, that the Judge struck down the motion by the OG on NSS and any evidence that they have.

"The court has entered an order striking the portions of my brief referring to naked short selling. Her ruling denies the admission of SH Exhibit 1. It is apparent she will not consider our evidence of naked shorting in her ruling. I will have this order posted this afternoon. "

--------------------
Invest with your brain not with your heart.

Posts: 4405 | From: Bristol, Tn, USA | Registered: Aug 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Ric
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Ric     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
legaleagle
Member


Member Rated:
posted July 06, 2005 12:57
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CHECK OUT THE SIMILARITIES BETWEEN THIS COMPANY AND CMKX, AND HOW IT IS HANDLING THE PROBLEM. SOUND FAMILIAR?

================================================

You may want to think that it is close but there is one huge difference. In your example the company is taking the forefront in dealing with this. With CMKX its the Shareholder that had to do something. The company seems to care less.

--------------------
Invest with your brain not with your heart.

Posts: 4405 | From: Bristol, Tn, USA | Registered: Aug 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
legaleagle
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for legaleagle     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Ric:
Everyone did also notice in Frizzel's letter, that the Judge struck down the motion by the OG on NSS and any evidence that they have.

"The court has entered an order striking the portions of my brief referring to naked short selling. Her ruling denies the admission of SH Exhibit 1. It is apparent she will not consider our evidence of naked shorting in her ruling. I will have this order posted this afternoon. "

She can strike the motion, Ric, but she cannot strike her responsibilities to report the commission of crimes to the appropriate authorities. It is mandated by law.
Posts: 2375 | Registered: Nov 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
legaleagle
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for legaleagle     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Ric:
legaleagle
Member


Member Rated:
posted July 06, 2005 12:57
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CHECK OUT THE SIMILARITIES BETWEEN THIS COMPANY AND CMKX, AND HOW IT IS HANDLING THE PROBLEM. SOUND FAMILIAR?

================================================

You may want to think that it is close but there is one huge difference. In your example the company is taking the forefront in dealing with this. With CMKX its the Shareholder that had to do something. The company seems to care less.

Ric, there you go assuming again. You don't know what the company is doing. You are only seeing what you want to see, or what supports your contentions.
Posts: 2375 | Registered: Nov 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
bmarley5780
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for bmarley5780         Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
still goin on.......blah
Posts: 1533 | From: jacksonville, nc, usa | Registered: Dec 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
will
Member


Icon 1 posted      Profile for will     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
LOL

"Ric, there you go assuming again. You don't know what the company is doing. You are only seeing what you want to see, or what supports your contentions."

Isn't that rich, coming from you, noah.

Talk about seeing what you want to see or what supports your imagination, you have been doing exactly that for over a year now. You and all the pumpers and faithful.

--------------------
A million seconds is 13 days.
A billion seconds is 31 years.

Posts: 4893 | From: Burbank IL USA | Registered: Feb 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Ric
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Ric     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
I guess you didn't listen to Frizzel in the PalTalk did you. He clearly stated she didn't. I think he would know more then the self proclaimed know it alls on PB32.


quote:
Originally posted by legaleagle:
quote:
Originally posted by Ric:
Everyone did also notice in Frizzel's letter, that the Judge struck down the motion by the OG on NSS and any evidence that they have.

"The court has entered an order striking the portions of my brief referring to naked short selling. Her ruling denies the admission of SH Exhibit 1. It is apparent she will not consider our evidence of naked shorting in her ruling. I will have this order posted this afternoon. "

She can strike the motion, Ric, but she cannot strike her responsibilities to report the commission of crimes to the appropriate authorities. It is mandated by law.


--------------------
Invest with your brain not with your heart.

Posts: 4405 | From: Bristol, Tn, USA | Registered: Aug 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Ric
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Ric     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Looks like the cult from PB32 caused the Judge to change her number for her fax. I am sure that there interference really makes her heart go out for CMKX, lol.

Covert$$$
God of Diamonds

member is offline


SECRECY - If anyone knew our mission, WE FAILED




Joined: Aug 2004
Gender: Male
Posts: 868
Location: Philadelphia Suburbs
Judge Murray's fax number disconnected? ? ?
« Thread Started on Yesterday at 4:48pm »

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I just tried to fax a followup note to Judge Murray. Her fax number 202-942-9655 answered with a recording that the number was disconnected. Does anyone have her new fax number? TIA

--------------------
Invest with your brain not with your heart.

Posts: 4405 | From: Bristol, Tn, USA | Registered: Aug 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
bill1352
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for bill1352     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
your right legal..i'f i'm running a mining company & i have 1 drill rig & a million acres to explore & a 703 billion & $60 million to invest the first thing i'm buying is gems. it wouldn't make any sence to buy another drill rig or 2 maybe pay for better ppl to explore those claims. nope get me a bag of jade or whatever & i can display them at the race track every week.

--------------------
"keep your stick on the ice & your cup firmly in place"

Posts: 3651 | From: Algonac, MI. 48001 | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
bill1352
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for bill1352     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
i'm sure that judge just loves the cmkx shareholders Ric. her & that assistant who's number frizzy forgot to black out on the OG site. i'm bettin they chip in for roses to send out when it gets revoked.

--------------------
"keep your stick on the ice & your cup firmly in place"

Posts: 3651 | From: Algonac, MI. 48001 | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
bill1352
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for bill1352     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
yep TNLD sound just like cmkx...except for the part about the SEC finding nothing when searching company records or should i say the SEC finding something as in books, financial records, contracts & all in order. Legal you said all the SEC could find was a false form 15? maybe ya think having a lack of books, records, contracts, financial records had something to do with what they found? the only thing that TLND & CMKX have in common are that they are shorted but then CMKX has that in common with hundreds of companies. unlike cmkx they have all the books in place & correct. ya ever think maybe the SEC wanted to look at their books to find a good company with all the "T's" crossed & "I's" dotted that was naked shorted to explore & maybe find ways to clear up the problem? as your beloved dr. d said a lot of ppl know a lot more then they are letting on. there may be a whole behind the seen move going on that is bent on cleaning the problem up. in fact another cult hero Zen, thinks that same thing.

--------------------
"keep your stick on the ice & your cup firmly in place"

Posts: 3651 | From: Algonac, MI. 48001 | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
bill1352
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for bill1352     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
ok the cult has lost it completely....again. a "joke" from RB


http://foros.recoletos.es/foros-diarioeconomico/thread.jspa?threadID=663

--------------------
"keep your stick on the ice & your cup firmly in place"

Posts: 3651 | From: Algonac, MI. 48001 | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
legaleagle
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for legaleagle     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Banco Espirito Santo will launch a takeover to CMKM Diamonds Inc
Mensagem enviada: 6/jul/2005 16:30 Responder


Lisbon - Today´s rumor that CMKM Diamonds Inc will enter in the Angola diamond market make a reaction on the portuguese interests that are in Angola. A source of Banco Espirito Santo said that this bank could make a takeover of CMKM Diamonds Inc. The source said Banco Espirito Santo is preparing to notifie will n next friday the Portuguese National Securities Market Commission (CNMV) that it was willing to waive the condition of a 75% minimum acceptance level to which its public offer for the acquisition of CMKM Diamonds Inc shares was subject, taking into consideration that the response received will be sufficient to develop the business project pursued through the takeover bid. Banco Espirito Santo if the rumour is true will launch a takeover bid for CMKM Diamonds Inc with the payment of 0,001 euros for each of the that responded to the tender offer, this initial offer could reach the limit of price of 0,0015 euros for each share of the company.

Posts: 2375 | Registered: Nov 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
  This topic comprises 87 pages: 1  2  3  ...  81  82  83  84  85  86  87   

Quick Reply
Message:

HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.

Instant Graemlins
   


Post New Topic  New Poll  Post A Reply Close Topic   Feature Topic   Move Topic   Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:


Contact Us | Allstocks.com Message Board Home

© 1997 - 2019 Allstocks.com. All rights reserved.

Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classic™ 6.7.2

Share