We have already spoken. Hope he and his wife are not too far into CMKX or USCA.

quote:

---

Originally posted by will:
If I told you how I really felt I wouodn't be allowed to post here anymore.

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by Wallace#1:
RATTLE! RATTLE! RATTLE! Right, legaleagle?

---

Huh?

bluediamonds

Family Member

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posts: 16
Registered: 28-10-2004
Member Is Offline

posted on 13-11-2004 at 03:59 AM

Time to put everything into perspective!! by brown1972

Time to put everything into perspective!! by brown1972
Diamond Hunter
member is offline

Posts: 28
Time to put everything into perspective!!
« Thread started on: Nov 12th, 2004, 1:57pm »

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Like everyone here, I have been watching the daily soap opera that is CMKX/USCA. Lately, we have all been bogged down by a disappointing party and the USCA halt as well as the CMKX halt in Sask. and let's not forget the dismal PPS or the fact that we have not seen news from either company in 16 days.

But we all knew going into this that it would be an uphill battle. And one that I am confident we will win. So instead of heading into the weekend depressed by what we have experienced this month, let us look at important facts that have not gotten their proper attention.

I think the biggest news of the year just came out the past few weeks and too many of us did not fully realize its importance. I am speaking of news from Shore Gold and Debeers/Kensington. Shore Gold announces that they will be concluding their sampling program with the last batches of dirt and their geologists are very confident that they will reach and/or exceed their 3,000 carat goal. Let's remember who they are right next to folks. CMKX. In addition, the ever elusive and secretive Debeers has announced that they are forming an action committee to analyze the feasability of a diamond mine on their property. They have already pledged a boatload of money for further exploration in this area for the coming year. Once again, what was the name of that company that they are right next door to?? Oh yeah, CMKX.

For those on the boards who are having their doubts as of late, just take a look at the neighbors and see how green their grass is growing. I must give credit to Sterling. Many months ago in a post on his board he basically stated that "If your neighbor's property was worth billions of dollars, wouldn't you stick around to see if yours is also worth as much" That my friends is how I feel about CMKX and I think it is something we should all keep focused on. Rendal Willimas did state at the races for many to hear that CMKX "Has got the goods." Even the Greenbaron as of last night, who was also at the race where Rendal made this statement, declares their belief that CMKX "Has got the goods"

Now as of today we learn some more good news. CMKX has decided to step up their level of professionalism by bringing Andy Hill on board as IR person. We all have different opinions of Melvin and it is my belief he will be utilized in the future by UC for a good purpose. But we certainly need to reach a higher standard which Chris at USCA has exhibited for sometime now. I also think that this move is a way to end all of this PalTalk garbage which an IR person has no business conducting.

Folks, we are going to move to the big leagues one day soon, and we can not have the kindergarten come with us when we do. I wish Andy Hill the best of luck and feel confident that he will do his best for all of us.

One other thing. Hats off again to Driller and his awesome DD and posts. I must say that when he posts it is always quality and never to waste our time. Thank you Driller for all that you do for us here. His post today regarding the American Mine and what it means to CMKX and USCA is a very poignant piece. In a nutshell folks, we are making money and going forward. This is monumental for a pinksheet company.

Lastly, keep in mind everyone that we are still waiting on a most delicious pile of PRs. With the latest halt in trading in news, it can only mean that PRs are backed up and waiting to go. Think of it like a line of 747s just waiting for clearance to land at the airport. You can see them in a line in the sky.

I wish everyone the best going forward.

IMVHO

Brown1972
http://cmkx.********s35.com/index.cgi?board=general&action=display&num=1100285828

You wrote:
"I don't like reposting, but occasionally you find an inteliigent one out there that is neither "pump" nor "bash", and worth reposting, like this one."
**************************************

That most certainly was not a "bash" you reposted. Disagree as to the "pump" part!! LOL

Not accustomed to reposting...Don't like to do it? LMAO That's OK. You were always welcome here.

quote:

---

Originally posted by Wallace#1:
legaleagle,

You wrote:
"I don't like reposting, but occasionally you find an inteliigent one out there that is neither "pump" nor "bash", and worth reposting, like this one."
**************************************

That most certainly was not a "bash" you reposted. Disagree as to the "pump" part!! LOL

Not accustomed to reposting...Don't like to do it? LMAO That's OK. You were always welcome here.

[This message has been edited by Wallace#1 (edited November 13, 2004).]

---

You seem to be trying to make a point. While I think I know what it is, I don't make presumptions. Please be clear and precise about what you are saying, so that I can respond.

Wallace/We have common grounds in train & Northern Prophet. First, I purchased yesterday at auction six nice Lionel items. Five of the items were in original boxes with inserts(nos. 362,352,252 & 140).

quote:

---

Originally posted by bill1352:
[B] i'd love to find 1 real positive piece of info about cmkx not someones guesses or fabricated story lines. i don't like kool-aide even when i make it. cmkx has 779 billion shares out and the dividend split is proof until cmkx can prove its not. hoping & guessing that its not isn't worth the time it takes to type out in here. no amount of diamonds, uranium, gold, silver or whatever will make 779 billion shares worth more then .0002 or .0003 period.it is not naked shorted because you cant buy restricted shares to cover a dividend. period. mm's can not buy CIM shares in any form as they are not real yet. period. end of naked shorted theory.B]

---

Rule 351. Transmittal of Documents to Secretary; Record Index; Certification.
(a) Transmittal From Hearing Officer to Secretary of Partial Record Index. The hearing officer may, at any time, transmit to the Secretary motions,exhibits or any other original documents filed with or accepted into evidence by the hearing officer, together with an index of such documents. The hearing officer, may, by order, require the interested division or other persons to assist in promptly transporting such documents from the hearing location to the Office of the Secretary.
(b) Preparation, Certification of Record Index. Promptly after the close of the hearing, the hearing officer shall transmit to the Secretary an index of the originals of any motions, exhibits or any other documents filed with or accepted into evidence by the hearing officer that have not been previously transmitted to the Secretary, and the Secretary shall prepare a record index. Prior to issuance of an initial decision, or if no initial decision is to be prepared, within 30 days of the close of the hearing, the Secretary shall transmit the record index to the hearing officer and serve a copy of the record index on each party. Any person may file proposed corrections to the record index with the hearing officer within 15 days of service of the record index. The hearing officer shall, by order, direct whether any corrections to the record index shall be made. The Secretary shall make such corrections, if any, and issue a revised record index. If an initial decision is to be issued, the initial decision shall include a certification that the record consists of the items set forth in the record index or revised record index issued by the Secretary.
(c) Final Transmittal of Record Items to the Secretary. After the close of the hearing, the hearing officer shall transmit to the Secretary originals of any motions, exhibits or any other documents filed with, or accepted into evidence by, the hearing officer, or any other portions of the record that have not already been transmitted to the Secretary. Prior to service of the initial decision by the Secretary, or if no initial decision is to be issued, within 60 days of the close of the hearing, the Secretary shall inform the hearing officer if any portions of the record are not in the Secretary's custody.
Comment: The Office of the Secretary is responsible for custody and safekeeping of administrative proceedings records. Hearings, however, are often held away from the Commission's Headquarters in Washington. Exhibits introduced at such hearings or filings made directly with the hearing officer (see Rule 151) may be voluminous. Rule 350 establishes procedures to facilitate and safeguard the transfer to the Secretary of motions, exhibits or other record items filed with the hearing officer. Parties and otherpersons are afforded a specific opportunity to object if they believe that the certified record is incomplete.

Rule 360. Initial Decision of Hearing Officer.
(a)(1) When Required. Unless the Commission directs otherwise, the hearing officer shall prepare an initial decision in any proceeding in which the Commission directs a hearing officer to preside at a hearing, provided, however, that an initial decision may be waived by the parties with the consent of the hearing officer pursuant to Rule 202.
(2) Time Period for Filing Initial Decision. In the order instituting proceedings, the Commission will specify a time period in which the hearing officer's initial decision must be filed with the Secretary. In the Commission's discretion, after consideration of the nature, complexity and urgency of the subject matter, and with due regard for the public interest and the protection of investors, this time period will be either 120, 210 or 300 days from the date of service of the order. Under the 300-day timeline, the hearing officer shall issue an order providing that there shall be approximately 4 months from the order instituting the proceeding to the hearing, approximately 2 months for the parties to obtain the transcript and submit briefs, and approximately 4 months after briefing for the hearing officer to issue an initial decision. Under the 210-day timeline, the hearing officer shall issue an order providing that there shall be approximately 2 1/2 months from the order instituting the proceeding to the hearing, approximately 2 months for the parties to review the transcript and submit briefs, and approximately 2 1/2 months after briefing for the hearing officer to issue an initial decision. Under the 120-day timeline, the hearing officer shall issue an order providing that there shall be approximately 1 month from the order instituting the proceeding to the hearing, approximately 2 months for the parties to review the transcript and submit briefs, and approximately 1 month after briefing for the hearing officer to issue an initial decision. These deadlines confer no substantive rights on respondents.
(3) Motion for Extension. In the event that the hearing officer presiding over the proceeding determines that it will not be possible to issue the initial decision within the specified period of time, the hearing officer should consult with the Chief Administrative Law Judge. Following such consultation, the Chief Administrative Law Judge may determine, in his or her discretion, to submit a motion to the Commission requesting an extension of the time period for filing the initial decision. This motion must be filed no later than 30 days prior to the expiration of the time specified in the order for issuance of an initial decision. The motion will be served upon all parties in the proceeding, who may file with the Commission statements in support of or in opposition to the motion. If the Commission determines that additional time is necessary or appropriate in the public interest, the Commission shall issue an order extending the time period for filing the initial decision.
(b) Content. An initial decision shall include: findings and conclusions, and the reasons or basis therefor, as to all the material issues of fact, law or discretion presented on the record and the appropriate order, sanction, relief, ordenial thereof. The initial decision shall also state the time period, not to exceed 21 days after service of the decision, except for good cause shown, within which a petition for review of the initial decision may be filed. The reasons for any extension of time shall be stated in the initial decision. The initial decision shall also include a statement that, as provided in paragraph (d) of this rule:
(1) the initial decision shall become the final decision of the Commission as to each party unless a party files a petition for review of the initial decision or the Commission determines on its own initiative to review the initial decision as to a party; and
(2) if a party timely files a petition for review or the Commission takes action to review as to a party, the initial decision shall not become final with respect to that party.
(c) Filing, Service and Publication. The hearing officer shall file the initial decision with the Secretary. The Secretary shall promptly serve the initial decision upon the parties and shall promptly publish notice of the filing thereof in the SEC News Digest. Thereafter, the Secretary shall publish the initial decision in the SEC Docket; provided, however, that in nonpublic proceedings no notice shall be published unless the Commission otherwise directs.

Rule 351. Transmittal of Documents to Secretary; Record Index; Certification.
(a) Transmittal From Hearing Officer to Secretary of Partial Record Index. The hearing officer may, at any time, transmit to the Secretary motions,exhibits or any other original documents filed with or accepted into evidence by the hearing officer, together with an index of such documents. The hearing officer, may, by order, require the interested division or other persons to assist in promptly transporting such documents from the hearing location to the Office of the Secretary.
(b) Preparation, Certification of Record Index. Promptly after the close of the hearing, the hearing officer shall transmit to the Secretary an index of the originals of any motions, exhibits or any other documents filed with or accepted into evidence by the hearing officer that have not been previously transmitted to the Secretary, and the Secretary shall prepare a record index. Prior to issuance of an initial decision, or if no initial decision is to be prepared, within 30 days of the close of the hearing, the Secretary shall transmit the record index to the hearing officer and serve a copy of the record index on each party. Any person may file proposed corrections to the record index with the hearing officer within 15 days of service of the record index. The hearing officer shall, by order, direct whether any corrections to the record index shall be made. The Secretary shall make such corrections, if any, and issue a revised record index. If an initial decision is to be issued, the initial decision shall include a certification that the record consists of the items set forth in the record index or revised record index issued by the Secretary.
(c) Final Transmittal of Record Items to the Secretary. After the close of the hearing, the hearing officer shall transmit to the Secretary originals of any motions, exhibits or any other documents filed with, or accepted into evidence by, the hearing officer, or any other portions of the record that have not already been transmitted to the Secretary. Prior to service of the initial decision by the Secretary, or if no initial decision is to be issued, within 60 days of the close of the hearing, the Secretary shall inform the hearing officer if any portions of the record are not in the Secretary's custody.
Comment: The Office of the Secretary is responsible for custody and safekeeping of administrative proceedings records. Hearings, however, are often held away from the Commission's Headquarters in Washington. Exhibits introduced at such hearings or filings made directly with the hearing officer (see Rule 151) may be voluminous. Rule 350 establishes procedures to facilitate and safeguard the transfer to the Secretary of motions, exhibits or other record items filed with the hearing officer. Parties and otherpersons are afforded a specific opportunity to object if they believe that the certified record is incomplete.

Rule 360. Initial Decision of Hearing Officer.
(a)(1) When Required. Unless the Commission directs otherwise, the hearing officer shall prepare an initial decision in any proceeding in which the Commission directs a hearing officer to preside at a hearing, provided, however, that an initial decision may be waived by the parties with the consent of the hearing officer pursuant to Rule 202.
(2) Time Period for Filing Initial Decision. In the order instituting proceedings, the Commission will specify a time period in which the hearing officer's initial decision must be filed with the Secretary. In the Commission's discretion, after consideration of the nature, complexity and urgency of the subject matter, and with due regard for the public interest and the protection of investors, this time period will be either 120, 210 or 300 days from the date of service of the order. Under the 300-day timeline, the hearing officer shall issue an order providing that there shall be approximately 4 months from the order instituting the proceeding to the hearing, approximately 2 months for the parties to obtain the transcript and submit briefs, and approximately 4 months after briefing for the hearing officer to issue an initial decision. Under the 210-day timeline, the hearing officer shall issue an order providing that there shall be approximately 2 1/2 months from the order instituting the proceeding to the hearing, approximately 2 months for the parties to review the transcript and submit briefs, and approximately 2 1/2 months after briefing for the hearing officer to issue an initial decision. Under the 120-day timeline, the hearing officer shall issue an order providing that there shall be approximately 1 month from the order instituting the proceeding to the hearing, approximately 2 months for the parties to review the transcript and submit briefs, and approximately 1 month after briefing for the hearing officer to issue an initial decision. These deadlines confer no substantive rights on respondents.
(3) Motion for Extension. In the event that the hearing officer presiding over the proceeding determines that it will not be possible to issue the initial decision within the specified period of time, the hearing officer should consult with the Chief Administrative Law Judge. Following such consultation, the Chief Administrative Law Judge may determine, in his or her discretion, to submit a motion to the Commission requesting an extension of the time period for filing the initial decision. This motion must be filed no later than 30 days prior to the expiration of the time specified in the order for issuance of an initial decision. The motion will be served upon all parties in the proceeding, who may file with the Commission statements in support of or in opposition to the motion. If the Commission determines that additional time is necessary or appropriate in the public interest, the Commission shall issue an order extending the time period for filing the initial decision.
(b) Content. An initial decision shall include: findings and conclusions, and the reasons or basis therefor, as to all the material issues of fact, law or discretion presented on the record and the appropriate order, sanction, relief, ordenial thereof. The initial decision shall also state the time period, not to exceed 21 days after service of the decision, except for good cause shown, within which a petition for review of the initial decision may be filed. The reasons for any extension of time shall be stated in the initial decision. The initial decision shall also include a statement that, as provided in paragraph (d) of this rule:
(1) the initial decision shall become the final decision of the Commission as to each party unless a party files a petition for review of the initial decision or the Commission determines on its own initiative to review the initial decision as to a party; and
(2) if a party timely files a petition for review or the Commission takes action to review as to a party, the initial decision shall not become final with respect to that party.
(c) Filing, Service and Publication. The hearing officer shall file the initial decision with the Secretary. The Secretary shall promptly serve the initial decision upon the parties and shall promptly publish notice of the filing thereof in the SEC News Digest. Thereafter, the Secretary shall publish the initial decision in the SEC Docket; provided, however, that in nonpublic proceedings no notice shall be published unless the Commission otherwise directs.

Rule 351. Transmittal of Documents to Secretary; Record Index; Certification.
(a) Transmittal From Hearing Officer to Secretary of Partial Record Index. The hearing officer may, at any time, transmit to the Secretary motions,exhibits or any other original documents filed with or accepted into evidence by the hearing officer, together with an index of such documents. The hearing officer, may, by order, require the interested division or other persons to assist in promptly transporting such documents from the hearing location to the Office of the Secretary.
(b) Preparation, Certification of Record Index. Promptly after the close of the hearing, the hearing officer shall transmit to the Secretary an index of the originals of any motions, exhibits or any other documents filed with or accepted into evidence by the hearing officer that have not been previously transmitted to the Secretary, and the Secretary shall prepare a record index. Prior to issuance of an initial decision, or if no initial decision is to be prepared, within 30 days of the close of the hearing, the Secretary shall transmit the record index to the hearing officer and serve a copy of the record index on each party. Any person may file proposed corrections to the record index with the hearing officer within 15 days of service of the record index. The hearing officer shall, by order, direct whether any corrections to the record index shall be made. The Secretary shall make such corrections, if any, and issue a revised record index. If an initial decision is to be issued, the initial decision shall include a certification that the record consists of the items set forth in the record index or revised record index issued by the Secretary.
(c) Final Transmittal of Record Items to the Secretary. After the close of the hearing, the hearing officer shall transmit to the Secretary originals of any motions, exhibits or any other documents filed with, or accepted into evidence by, the hearing officer, or any other portions of the record that have not already been transmitted to the Secretary. Prior to service of the initial decision by the Secretary, or if no initial decision is to be issued, within 60 days of the close of the hearing, the Secretary shall inform the hearing officer if any portions of the record are not in the Secretary's custody.
Comment: The Office of the Secretary is responsible for custody and safekeeping of administrative proceedings records. Hearings, however, are often held away from the Commission's Headquarters in Washington. Exhibits introduced at such hearings or filings made directly with the hearing officer (see Rule 151) may be voluminous. Rule 350 establishes procedures to facilitate and safeguard the transfer to the Secretary of motions, exhibits or other record items filed with the hearing officer. Parties and otherpersons are afforded a specific opportunity to object if they believe that the certified record is incomplete.

Rule 360. Initial Decision of Hearing Officer.
(a)(1) When Required. Unless the Commission directs otherwise, the hearing officer shall prepare an initial decision in any proceeding in which the Commission directs a hearing officer to preside at a hearing, provided, however, that an initial decision may be waived by the parties with the consent of the hearing officer pursuant to Rule 202.
(2) Time Period for Filing Initial Decision. In the order instituting proceedings, the Commission will specify a time period in which the hearing officer's initial decision must be filed with the Secretary. In the Commission's discretion, after consideration of the nature, complexity and urgency of the subject matter, and with due regard for the public interest and the protection of investors, this time period will be either 120, 210 or 300 days from the date of service of the order. Under the 300-day timeline, the hearing officer shall issue an order providing that there shall be approximately 4 months from the order instituting the proceeding to the hearing, approximately 2 months for the parties to obtain the transcript and submit briefs, and approximately 4 months after briefing for the hearing officer to issue an initial decision. Under the 210-day timeline, the hearing officer shall issue an order providing that there shall be approximately 2 1/2 months from the order instituting the proceeding to the hearing, approximately 2 months for the parties to review the transcript and submit briefs, and approximately 2 1/2 months after briefing for the hearing officer to issue an initial decision. Under the 120-day timeline, the hearing officer shall issue an order providing that there shall be approximately 1 month from the order instituting the proceeding to the hearing, approximately 2 months for the parties to review the transcript and submit briefs, and approximately 1 month after briefing for the hearing officer to issue an initial decision. These deadlines confer no substantive rights on respondents.
(3) Motion for Extension. In the event that the hearing officer presiding over the proceeding determines that it will not be possible to issue the initial decision within the specified period of time, the hearing officer should consult with the Chief Administrative Law Judge. Following such consultation, the Chief Administrative Law Judge may determine, in his or her discretion, to submit a motion to the Commission requesting an extension of the time period for filing the initial decision. This motion must be filed no later than 30 days prior to the expiration of the time specified in the order for issuance of an initial decision. The motion will be served upon all parties in the proceeding, who may file with the Commission statements in support of or in opposition to the motion. If the Commission determines that additional time is necessary or appropriate in the public interest, the Commission shall issue an order extending the time period for filing the initial decision.
(b) Content. An initial decision shall include: findings and conclusions, and the reasons or basis therefor, as to all the material issues of fact, law or discretion presented on the record and the appropriate order, sanction, relief, ordenial thereof. The initial decision shall also state the time period, not to exceed 21 days after service of the decision, except for good cause shown, within which a petition for review of the initial decision may be filed. The reasons for any extension of time shall be stated in the initial decision. The initial decision shall also include a statement that, as provided in paragraph (d) of this rule:
(1) the initial decision shall become the final decision of the Commission as to each party unless a party files a petition for review of the initial decision or the Commission determines on its own initiative to review the initial decision as to a party; and
(2) if a party timely files a petition for review or the Commission takes action to review as to a party, the initial decision shall not become final with respect to that party.
(c) Filing, Service and Publication. The hearing officer shall file the initial decision with the Secretary. The Secretary shall promptly serve the initial decision upon the parties and shall promptly publish notice of the filing thereof in the SEC News Digest. Thereafter, the Secretary shall publish the initial decision in the SEC Docket; provided, however, that in nonpublic proceedings no notice shall be published unless the Commission otherwise directs.

Rule 351. Transmittal of Documents to Secretary; Record Index; Certification.
(a) Transmittal From Hearing Officer to Secretary of Partial Record Index. The hearing officer may, at any time, transmit to the Secretary motions,exhibits or any other original documents filed with or accepted into evidence by the hearing officer, together with an index of such documents. The hearing officer, may, by order, require the interested division or other persons to assist in promptly transporting such documents from the hearing location to the Office of the Secretary.
(b) Preparation, Certification of Record Index. Promptly after the close of the hearing, the hearing officer shall transmit to the Secretary an index of the originals of any motions, exhibits or any other documents filed with or accepted into evidence by the hearing officer that have not been previously transmitted to the Secretary, and the Secretary shall prepare a record index. Prior to issuance of an initial decision, or if no initial decision is to be prepared, within 30 days of the close of the hearing, the Secretary shall transmit the record index to the hearing officer and serve a copy of the record index on each party. Any person may file proposed corrections to the record index with the hearing officer within 15 days of service of the record index. The hearing officer shall, by order, direct whether any corrections to the record index shall be made. The Secretary shall make such corrections, if any, and issue a revised record index. If an initial decision is to be issued, the initial decision shall include a certification that the record consists of the items set forth in the record index or revised record index issued by the Secretary.
(c) Final Transmittal of Record Items to the Secretary. After the close of the hearing, the hearing officer shall transmit to the Secretary originals of any motions, exhibits or any other documents filed with, or accepted into evidence by, the hearing officer, or any other portions of the record that have not already been transmitted to the Secretary. Prior to service of the initial decision by the Secretary, or if no initial decision is to be issued, within 60 days of the close of the hearing, the Secretary shall inform the hearing officer if any portions of the record are not in the Secretary's custody.
Comment: The Office of the Secretary is responsible for custody and safekeeping of administrative proceedings records. Hearings, however, are often held away from the Commission's Headquarters in Washington. Exhibits introduced at such hearings or filings made directly with the hearing officer (see Rule 151) may be voluminous. Rule 350 establishes procedures to facilitate and safeguard the transfer to the Secretary of motions, exhibits or other record items filed with the hearing officer. Parties and otherpersons are afforded a specific opportunity to object if they believe that the certified record is incomplete.

Rule 360. Initial Decision of Hearing Officer.
(a)(1) When Required. Unless the Commission directs otherwise, the hearing officer shall prepare an initial decision in any proceeding in which the Commission directs a hearing officer to preside at a hearing, provided, however, that an initial decision may be waived by the parties with the consent of the hearing officer pursuant to Rule 202.
(2) Time Period for Filing Initial Decision. In the order instituting proceedings, the Commission will specify a time period in which the hearing officer's initial decision must be filed with the Secretary. In the Commission's discretion, after consideration of the nature, complexity and urgency of the subject matter, and with due regard for the public interest and the protection of investors, this time period will be either 120, 210 or 300 days from the date of service of the order. Under the 300-day timeline, the hearing officer shall issue an order providing that there shall be approximately 4 months from the order instituting the proceeding to the hearing, approximately 2 months for the parties to obtain the transcript and submit briefs, and approximately 4 months after briefing for the hearing officer to issue an initial decision. Under the 210-day timeline, the hearing officer shall issue an order providing that there shall be approximately 2 1/2 months from the order instituting the proceeding to the hearing, approximately 2 months for the parties to review the transcript and submit briefs, and approximately 2 1/2 months after briefing for the hearing officer to issue an initial decision. Under the 120-day timeline, the hearing officer shall issue an order providing that there shall be approximately 1 month from the order instituting the proceeding to the hearing, approximately 2 months for the parties to review the transcript and submit briefs, and approximately 1 month after briefing for the hearing officer to issue an initial decision. These deadlines confer no substantive rights on respondents.
(3) Motion for Extension. In the event that the hearing officer presiding over the proceeding determines that it will not be possible to issue the initial decision within the specified period of time, the hearing officer should consult with the Chief Administrative Law Judge. Following such consultation, the Chief Administrative Law Judge may determine, in his or her discretion, to submit a motion to the Commission requesting an extension of the time period for filing the initial decision. This motion must be filed no later than 30 days prior to the expiration of the time specified in the order for issuance of an initial decision. The motion will be served upon all parties in the proceeding, who may file with the Commission statements in support of or in opposition to the motion. If the Commission determines that additional time is necessary or appropriate in the public interest, the Commission shall issue an order extending the time period for filing the initial decision.
(b) Content. An initial decision shall include: findings and conclusions, and the reasons or basis therefor, as to all the material issues of fact, law or discretion presented on the record and the appropriate order, sanction, relief, ordenial thereof. The initial decision shall also state the time period, not to exceed 21 days after service of the decision, except for good cause shown, within which a petition for review of the initial decision may be filed. The reasons for any extension of time shall be stated in the initial decision. The initial decision shall also include a statement that, as provided in paragraph (d) of this rule:
(1) the initial decision shall become the final decision of the Commission as to each party unless a party files a petition for review of the initial decision or the Commission determines on its own initiative to review the initial decision as to a party; and
(2) if a party timely files a petition for review or the Commission takes action to review as to a party, the initial decision shall not become final with respect to that party.
(c) Filing, Service and Publication. The hearing officer shall file the initial decision with the Secretary. The Secretary shall promptly serve the initial decision upon the parties and shall promptly publish notice of the filing thereof in the SEC News Digest. Thereafter, the Secretary shall publish the initial decision in the SEC Docket; provided, however, that in nonpublic proceedings no notice shall be published unless the Commission otherwise directs.

lionelbuff,

Sounds like you got some nice buys. You missed little at the York show. All dealers compalining about lack of sales.

Thanks for the info on oil stocks.

quote:

---

Originally posted by ed19363:
It's still all pumping, bashing and BS, until a PR comes out. This thread is rapidly becomming worthless as a source of information.

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by legaleagle:
I don't like reposting, but occasionally you find an inteliigent one out there that is neither "pump" nor "bash", and worth reposting, like this one.

bluediamonds

Family Member

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by Upside:
No new information, true. Any new speculation or theories?

---

NEWS!!!!

sterling just spec-o-lated that they found dinosaur eggs worth millions in the carolyn pipes. Lab results are going on right now.. expect a pr shortly...

CMKM Diamonds, Inc. (CMKX)

http://*************.com/Latest%20Update.htm

CMKX dividend stock US Canadian Minerals (USCA) began trading again today for the first time since it was halted the morning of October 28. Although no formal press release has been issued yet to explain the results of any questions from the SEC, trading has resumed in the shares of USCA. Today the shares of USCA were being traded through the Grey Sheets mostly around $3.00 per share post its 3-for-1 stock split. The Green Baron Report believes that due to the Veterans Day holiday that no new 15c-211 filings by market makers could be accepted so that USCA could retain its Bulletin Board listing. We expect to see USCA trade on the OTC Bulletin Board once again within the next few trading sessions.

Our primary focus is on CMKM Diamonds. Although some people remain concerned that the Saskatchewan Financial Services Commission has extended its special inquiry that was initiated on October 26, The Green Baron Report believes there is nothing to worry about. We have the utmost confidence that CMKX attorney D. Roger Glenn is helping satisfy any concerns initiated by this commission.

We have stated time and time again that we believe Mr. Glenn’s continued involvement with CMKX is not only vital, but lends serious validity to this Company. As many of our members that own CMKX stock, we would like a full explanation of everything NOW. However, we believe that Mr. Glenn is helping guide the directors of CMKM Diamonds to unveil the entire plan in a way that will be most beneficial to CMKX shareholders in the long term. We trust Mr. Glenn is the right man for this job, and that we will all be thankful by the results of his work very soon.

The Green Baron Report maintains its belief that CMKM Diamonds has “the goods”. Positive projections and increased budgets for mining activity in and around the Fort a La Corne area only confirm our belief that CMKM Diamonds could hold mineral rights to some of the most valuable property in the world. The stock remains pegged at .0002 on the offer, and it shocks us to see CMKX trade at this low price especially since well over 90% of all transactions and volume continue to be executed on the offer side. We remain convinced that CMKX will be The Stock Play of a Lifetime.

Please note: The Green Baron Report has made a special offer to CMKM Diamonds and its related companies to conduct periodic Green Baron webcasts at our expense. CMKX CEO Urban Casavant and USCA CEO Rendal Williams agreed to provide updates through this venue about every two weeks. The offer remains open to CMKM Diamonds, but we do not expect a new CEO webcast to occur until all inquiries have been completely resolved.

quote:

---

Originally posted by Upside:
Tradingpennys,
I agree with you that it doesn't matter if they're right next door to the producing pipes. I live within 5 miles of a mineral mine, they pull all kinds of things out of the ground, but, if I stick a shovel in the ground in my back yard guess what I pull up? Dirt! Just because I'm within close proximity to a producing mine doesn't mean my yard holds anything similar, just dirt.

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by Upside:
Tradingpennys,
I agree with you that it doesn't matter if they're right next door to the producing pipes. I live within 5 miles of a mineral mine, they pull all kinds of things out of the ground, but, if I stick a shovel in the ground in my back yard guess what I pull up? Dirt! Just because I'm within close proximity to a producing mine doesn't mean my yard holds anything similar, just dirt.

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by dwman:
Up, maybe you need a larger yard. lol

---

From what Bill posted November 11, 2004 17:07

quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by bill1352:
[B] i'd love to find 1 real positive piece of info about cmkx not someones guesses or fabricated story lines. i don't like kool-aide even when i make it. cmkx has 779 billion shares out and the dividend split is proof until cmkx can prove its not. hoping & guessing that its not isn't worth the time it takes to type out in here. no amount of diamonds, uranium, gold, silver or whatever will make 779 billion shares worth more then .0002 or .0003 period.it is not naked shorted because you cant buy restricted shares to cover a dividend. period. mm's can not buy CIM shares in any form as they are not real yet. period. end of naked shorted theory.B]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

If everything is as simple as that, and you think there isn't a shortage. CMKX was worth .0002-.0003 before the gold news,right?
779 billion x .0002 = $155,800,000
779 billion x .0003 = $223,700,000
So why wouldn't "diamonds, uranium, gold, silver or whatever " move it?

============================================

quote:

---

Originally posted by bill1352:
779 billion o/s. they would need a mountain of gold the size of everest to move that

---

I just don't understand I guess.
If the pps is what it is without the revenue coming in from the Portoviejo gold mine ( http://www.cmkxpics.com/ecuador2/pages/IMG_2454_JPG.htm ).Why wouldn't the pps move after the revenue from it starts coming in?
Because so many people there to sell thier shares?

quote:

---

Originally posted by highwaychild:
I just don't understand I guess.
If the pps is what it is without the revenue coming in from the Portoviejo gold mine ( http://www.cmkxpics.com/ecuador2/pages/IMG_2454_JPG.htm ).Why wouldn't the pps move after the revenue from it starts coming in?
Because so many people there to sell thier shares?

I remember when the old diamondiferous word came out last time, it moved then.

---

The 779 bil was a distribution number for dividends. Normally that would show the number of shares O/S, but this is not a normal stock. Yet.

We can speculate all day, but there will be no solid answers until CMKX is reporting, and the share structure has been established, and the PR's released.

How ridiculous would it be to make announcements about major finds while still on "pinks"?

When our JV's were halted, we issued the "diamondiferous" sample report. It was issued to permit the JV's to trade again, and that was it's only intended purpose.

It caused the pps to jump, but it was immediately manipulated back down. The same would happen again if they released any substantial finds while still on the 'pinks'.

"I remember when the old diamondiferous word came out last time, it moved then."
*****************************************

Don't you think that was when shareholders and potential buyers were believing everything anyone at CMKX or promoting CMKX had to say? Now, most (even some of the formerly faithful) seem to be saying, "I don't care what you say! When you PROVE it, only THEN will I believe it!"

In short, they have lost 99% of their credibility.

You wrote:

1) The 779 bil was a distribution number for dividends. Normally that would show the number of shares O/S, but this is not a normal stock.

Q: If the distribution number of dividend shares came out to 779 billion (or more), how can you argue that number is incorrect (except that maybe UC did not particapate) which would make the O/S more than 779 billion?

2) How ridiculous would it be to make announcements about major finds while still on "pinks"?

Q: What difference does being on the pinks vs anywhere else make as to making announcements? Would it not improve the pps so they could move to better markets?

3) When our JV's were halted, we issued the "diamondiferous" sample report. It was issued to permit the JV's to trade again, and that was it's only intended purpose.

Q: Isn't what you are saying here just the reverse of what actually happened? Maybe I am wrong, but didn't CMKX make it's release prior to the JVs being halted? It was then that the JVs were halted and had to produce their own PRs?

4) It caused the pps to jump, but it was immediately manipulated back down. The same would happen again if they released any substantial finds while still on the 'pinks'.

Q: As to the "manipulation", just who do you contend is doing that now/still? The MMs? Brokers? SEC? Bashers? The world at large?

NOTE: Just a few more obvious questions for you to answer while you contemplate how to answer previously unanswered questions.

Thanking you in advance for your response. We are looking forward to CLEAR, CONCISE and SUBSTANTIVE answers. Will and can you deliver?

"3) When our JV's were halted, we issued the "diamondiferous" sample report. It was issued to permit the JV's to trade again, and that was it's only intended purpose.

Q: Isn't what you are saying here just the reverse of what actually happened? Maybe I am wrong, but didn't CMKX make it's release prior to the JVs being halted? It was then that the JVs were halted and had to produce their own PRs?"

quote:

---

Originally posted by YngNvstor12:
i don't want to be a basher but why is everyone still tlaking about this stock. I am 16 and i started on this board back in AUGUst when the stock was at .0004 and thats all everyone talked about, now the stock is still tlaked about and its at .0002. I dont understand it theres just so many better pennies to play than cmkx

---

Probably because this is the most unusual and fascinating stock ever to be flushed down the toilet! LOL