posted
By: maccif 15 Sep 2004, 02:02 PM EDT Msg. 552191 of 552192 Jump to msg. # Go This is marco... stay tuned for tomorrow am.... This is all i am able to tell you. i will be back on later tonight.
Posts: 236 | From: IL, USA | Registered: Mar 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
the volume is ok i guess, but nothing compared to the old days.the average Joe has heard nothing about Qbid. but once this baby is out there with full public disclosure--watch out!
Posts: 5812 | From: st paul,mn | Registered: Feb 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
I wonder if this Marco realizes how serious we Qbidders are? He should take care because he's gonna go to work and find a herd of us standing on his stoop...asking if he needs help...uh...filing, answering phones, taking out the trash...
Posts: 3727 | Registered: Jul 2004
| IP: Logged |
MAY 15 WAS A "TEST" BROADCAST. SOFT LAUNCH WHICH WAS SUPPOSED TO BE ON C-BAND AND IS SUPPOSED TO BE GOING TO THIS DAY IS NOT. THIS ADDITIONALLY WAS GOING TO BE FOR ADVERTISERS TO REVIEW THE CHANNEL. WELL AS WE KNOW, THERE IS NO CHANNEL THAT IS BROADCASTING ON THAT TEST BASIS.
NOW WE GET THE NEWS BROADCAST IN SEPTEMBER WITH ANOTHER DELAY THAT THEY ARE WORKING HARD TO RESOLVE. THEN A DELAY CAUSE OF "SIGNAL PROBLEMS". RCN VERIFIES WE ARE BROADCASTING IN SAN FRANCISCO WHICH WE ARE NOT.
THEN....
A PR STATES WE MOVED TO FIRESTONE INSTEAD OF NETWORK TELEPORTS.
NOW AS OF TODAY, THEY HAVE BEEN TESTING IN AUGUST AND SEPTEMBER. WELL FUNNY, NETWORK TELEPORTS IS HAVING NOT A SINGLE PROBLEM WITH ANY OF IT'S SIGNALS.
BUT THE MAIN POINT IS:
NOW WE PULL OUT OUR REAR END THAT WE HAVE BEEN TESTING A SIGNAL THAT WAS SUPPOSED TO BE UP SINCE JUNE OR JULY ON A "SOFT" LAUNCH BASIS (SO ADVERTISERS CAN SEE IT REMEMBER) AND HOW CONVENIENT THAT A HURRICANE IS SUPPOSED TO HIT LOUISIANA AND THE OFF THE CUFF COMMENT THAT THE WEATHER IS THE PROBLEM.
WHAT ABOUT 2-3 WEEKS AGO WHEN THERE WAS NO HURRICANE IN SIGHT? NO WEATHER PROBLEMS THEN.
OH PLEASE!!!!!!!!
FRANK OLSEN: LISTEN HERE AND LISTEN CLEAR; YOU ARE A FRAUD AND ARE LIEING ON TOP OF LIEING ON TOP OF LIEING SOME MORE.
Q Television Network Moves its Satellite Signal; Network Announces an Agreement with Firestone Communications
"The testing we did in August and early September was very successful, so weather related problems are suspected,"
posted
U4...your momma must not have showed you much love. i feel bad for you...so much hate, all over the stock of a small company trying to start up and take a small space in the broadcast world. the pain you must have inside you from past hurts.....QBID owners, when q does get rolling we should chip in and buy U4 a big teddy bear, maybe it will remove some of that pain.....WOW i sounded like a liberal there for a moment, we can't have that. i'll have to listen to Rush Limbaugh for a few days.
Posts: 3651 | From: Algonac, MI. 48001 | Registered: Jun 2004
| IP: Logged |
and asked if I could find the interview on the site...the person said I've received a lot of faxes with the same request as yours and I'm not aware of this interview...I went on to discuss the ins/outs of her station (because you know I pretty much take a company's word when they say they did an interview if the company has a credible reputation)...and said to this person...it's a gay/lesbian 24/7 tv station about to go national...she said........OHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH YESSSSSSSSSSS WE DO HAVE A GAY/LESBIAN PROGRAM STATION HERE!!! It airs Sunday night from 10 to 12....
WFNX 101.7 FM WFNX 101.7 FM. 126 Brookline Street Boston, MA. Tel: Fax: Web Site. Business hours: Mon-Fri 9am-Midnight. Description. Owned by the Boston Phoenix. Categories. ... http://www.bostonphoenix.com/
if the Boston Phoenix gives it any publicity it should be pretty good....
MAY 15 WAS A "TEST" BROADCAST. SOFT LAUNCH WHICH WAS SUPPOSED TO BE ON C-BAND AND IS SUPPOSED TO BE GOING TO THIS DAY IS NOT. THIS ADDITIONALLY WAS GOING TO BE FOR ADVERTISERS TO REVIEW THE CHANNEL. WELL AS WE KNOW, THERE IS NO CHANNEL THAT IS BROADCASTING ON THAT TEST BASIS.
NOW WE GET THE NEWS BROADCAST IN SEPTEMBER WITH ANOTHER DELAY THAT THEY ARE WORKING HARD TO RESOLVE. THEN A DELAY CAUSE OF "SIGNAL PROBLEMS". RCN VERIFIES WE ARE BROADCASTING IN SAN FRANCISCO WHICH WE ARE NOT.
THEN....
A PR STATES WE MOVED TO FIRESTONE INSTEAD OF NETWORK TELEPORTS.
NOW AS OF TODAY, THEY HAVE BEEN TESTING IN AUGUST AND SEPTEMBER. WELL FUNNY, NETWORK TELEPORTS IS HAVING NOT A SINGLE PROBLEM WITH ANY OF IT'S SIGNALS.
BUT THE MAIN POINT IS:
NOW WE PULL OUT OUR REAR END THAT WE HAVE BEEN TESTING A SIGNAL THAT WAS SUPPOSED TO BE UP SINCE JUNE OR JULY ON A "SOFT" LAUNCH BASIS (SO ADVERTISERS CAN SEE IT REMEMBER) AND HOW CONVENIENT THAT A HURRICANE IS SUPPOSED TO HIT LOUISIANA AND THE OFF THE CUFF COMMENT THAT THE WEATHER IS THE PROBLEM.
WHAT ABOUT 2-3 WEEKS AGO WHEN THERE WAS NO HURRICANE IN SIGHT? NO WEATHER PROBLEMS THEN.
OH PLEASE!!!!!!!!
FRANK OLSEN: LISTEN HERE AND LISTEN CLEAR; YOU ARE A FRAUD AND ARE LIEING ON TOP OF LIEING ON TOP OF LIEING SOME MORE.
Q Television Network Moves its Satellite Signal; Network Announces an Agreement with Firestone Communications
"The testing we did in August and early September was very successful, so weather related problems are suspected,"
LETS ALL REMEMBER WHY U4 GOT INTO QBID STOCK AND WHAT A STRONG SUPPORTER HE WAS....NOW ALL OF A SUDDEN.......WHAT ARE HIS MOTIVES???? THE BASHERS ARE OUT IN FORCE...THERE IS A WAR GOING ON AT RAGING BULL...IT'S BRUTAL. I'M NOT SURPRISE U4 GETTING INTO THE GAME... U4TSAF2 Member posted May 04, 2004 21:49 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- LAST TIME I CHECKED SINCE I'M ONE OF THOSE WHO GOT IN ABOUT 7+ OR SO WEEKS AGO: QBID HIT A HIGH (RECENT) OF .027
HUM....
ISN'T THAT UP 27,000% FROM ABOUT 10 WEEKS AGO?
NOW QBID DROPS TO .014 TODAY
HUM....
ISN'T THAT ------>UP<------ 14,000% FROM A 10 WEEKS AGO? THAT DOESN'T MAKE MUCH SENSE THAT THE STOCK CAN ----->DROP<----- AND STILL HAVE RISEN 14,000%.
FURTHER, THE STOCK ----->DROPS<----- TO .014 AND TRADES $6 MILLION PLUS DOLLARS.
HUM....
WELL U4TSAF2, I GOT IN AT .018.
YEA U4TSAF2, I GOT IN AT .019.
ME 2 U4TSAF2, I GOT IN AT .01
SO THAT DOESN'T APPLY TO US. YOU JUST GOT LUCKY AND BOUGHT IN EARLIER THAN THE REST OF US.
WE GUESS WHAT:
U4TSAF2 BOUGHT ANOTHER 2 MIL ON TOP OF WHAT HE ALREADY HAD AT .02.
BOY, WHEN THE STOCK HITS .25 YOU CAN TELL EVERYONE WHO GOT IN AT .20 AFTER IT DROPS TO .13 THE STORY I'M GIVING YOU RIGHT HERE.
MARCH 3, 2006
L2 QBID
4X4.00 3X3.99 6X3.98 7X3.97
RESISTANCE IS AT $4.00 AND IF WE CAN GET THROUGH THAT THE SKY'S THE LIMIT
[This message has been edited by U4TSAF2 (edited May 04, 2004).]
Posts: 236 | From: IL, USA | Registered: Mar 2004
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by sunny: Kommon...do you think Marco is alluding to another press release?
Yes, he showed up on RB and stated to watch again in the morning...i cut and pasted it earlier...he said he would be on the board later...bashers are out very heavy on rb right now...something is brewing......take care.
Posts: 236 | From: IL, USA | Registered: Mar 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
Kommoncents- I think you hit the nail on the head. Something is cooking, I can smell it. Posts: 42 | From: Chicago, Illinois | Registered: Feb 2004
| IP: Logged |
Clyde Crashcup
unregistered
posted
quote:Originally posted by U4TSAF2: WHAT TESTING?
MAY 15 WAS A "TEST" BROADCAST. SOFT LAUNCH WHICH WAS SUPPOSED TO BE ON C-BAND AND IS SUPPOSED TO BE GOING TO THIS DAY IS NOT. THIS ADDITIONALLY WAS GOING TO BE FOR ADVERTISERS TO REVIEW THE CHANNEL. WELL AS WE KNOW, THERE IS NO CHANNEL THAT IS BROADCASTING ON THAT TEST BASIS.
NOW WE GET THE NEWS BROADCAST IN SEPTEMBER WITH ANOTHER DELAY THAT THEY ARE WORKING HARD TO RESOLVE. THEN A DELAY CAUSE OF "SIGNAL PROBLEMS". RCN VERIFIES WE ARE BROADCASTING IN SAN FRANCISCO WHICH WE ARE NOT.
THEN....
A PR STATES WE MOVED TO FIRESTONE INSTEAD OF NETWORK TELEPORTS.
NOW AS OF TODAY, THEY HAVE BEEN TESTING IN AUGUST AND SEPTEMBER. WELL FUNNY, NETWORK TELEPORTS IS HAVING NOT A SINGLE PROBLEM WITH ANY OF IT'S SIGNALS.
BUT THE MAIN POINT IS:
NOW WE PULL OUT OUR REAR END THAT WE HAVE BEEN TESTING A SIGNAL THAT WAS SUPPOSED TO BE UP SINCE JUNE OR JULY ON A "SOFT" LAUNCH BASIS (SO ADVERTISERS CAN SEE IT REMEMBER) AND HOW CONVENIENT THAT A HURRICANE IS SUPPOSED TO HIT LOUISIANA AND THE OFF THE CUFF COMMENT THAT THE WEATHER IS THE PROBLEM.
WHAT ABOUT 2-3 WEEKS AGO WHEN THERE WAS NO HURRICANE IN SIGHT? NO WEATHER PROBLEMS THEN.
OH PLEASE!!!!!!!!
FRANK OLSEN: LISTEN HERE AND LISTEN CLEAR; YOU ARE A FRAUD AND ARE LIEING ON TOP OF LIEING ON TOP OF LIEING SOME MORE.
Q Television Network Moves its Satellite Signal; Network Announces an Agreement with Firestone Communications
"The testing we did in August and early September was very successful, so weather related problems are suspected,"
U4 - You need to look up the word "slander" in the dictionary. IMO you are trying to hurt Olsons reputation and hurt the stock.
[This message has been edited by Clyde Crashcup (edited September 15, 2004).]
posted
It DOES make me wonder if Frank had a falling out with some who weren't on the same page as he. And that's not a particularly bad thing, either.
It SEEMS that he cut Deveney loose.
And maybe he had to cut Network Teleports loose for some reason.
Does anyone know if Firestone is bigger/better than NT?
(Oh, and sunny, your little spelling correction was SO under the radar FUNNY. I mean, after that rant, a little voice chimes in, "not to be picky, but...) I really L'd out L.
Posts: 1872 | From: right here | Registered: Apr 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
Geez, Just got back and I haven't even looked at the posts. Noticed theres 3 new pages from this morning.
Ahhh, it's nice to see we filled the Gap!
Just got back and I noticed we filled the .0049 & .0048. Gaps are the best way to daytrade! When a stock gaps up in the morning, you know it will retrace at some point so you can either sell it before it does or take advantage when it retraces.
When a stock gaps down, you can easily take advantage and make a quick profit because it will need to fill the gap. So obviously it will go up.
Gaps can take minutes, hours, days, weeks, or even months to fill. But rest asure, they always do.
posted
FRANK OLSEN: LISTEN HERE AND LISTEN CLEAR; YOU ARE A FRAUD AND ARE LIEING ON TOP OF LIEING ON TOP OF LIEING SOME MORE.
Lets see if I got this straight. The caps lock might have blurred my vision. Are you calling Frank a liar? Didn't you kinda take the long way around the barn on this one?
posted
[QUOTE]Originally posted by WinsumLosesum: [B]It DOES make me wonder if Frank had a falling out with some who weren't on the same page as he. And that's not a particularly bad thing, either.
It SEEMS that he cut Deveney loose.
And maybe he had to cut Network Teleports loose for some reason.
Does anyone know if Firestone is bigger/better than NT?
Just thinking out loud, anyone think maybe the switch to Firestone could have been done for the sake of a new carrier, perhaps the negotiations required Firestone over NT for some affiliation reason or signal???
Posts: 696 | From: Amish Country, PA, USA | Registered: Feb 2004
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by WinsumLosesum: It DOES make me wonder if Frank had a falling out with some who weren't on the same page as he. And that's not a particularly bad thing, either.
It SEEMS that he cut Deveney loose.
And maybe he had to cut Network Teleports loose for some reason.
Man I love being devil's advocate
These things go both ways. Don't discount the possibility that Deveney is the one who backed out of the deal (if there was in fact a fallout there). Recall that FO was sending out PRs without Deveney's knowledge. Now if you're a bigshot PR company and this little fly by night guy comes along and hires you, then continues to do his own thing, it would be in your best interest to say "thanks for the business, but we're outta here." At the same time, it seems as though he's gone with a tiny PR company with only 4 current clients. This would indicate a money problem to me. If you can't afford to pay for the 2000 lb PR gorilla, get the PR gerbil instead.
As far as Network Teleports goes.. I have a feeling that just about anyone would be better. I have a hard time placing trust in a technology based company that hasn't updated their website in over 9 years.
And on the issue of spelling, I also found that quite funny One thing I've noticed though is how many people here happen to spell huge "hugh" and doubt "dought"... makes me wonder when 3 or 4 different people all spell the same simple words incorrectly in the same way. But whatever.
-R
This has been a public service announcement from your local curmudgeon. The pps will now rise, your debt will disappear, and your genitals will grow 4".
Posts: 216 | From: Tampa, FL/Washington DC | Registered: Mar 2004
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by RobinO: Man I love being devil's advocate
These things go both ways. Don't discount the possibility that Deveney is the one who backed out of the deal (if there was in fact a fallout there). Recall that FO was sending out PRs without Deveney's knowledge. Now if you're a bigshot PR company and this little fly by night guy comes along and hires you, then continues to do his own thing, it would be in your best interest to say "thanks for the business, but we're outta here." At the same time, it seems as though he's gone with a tiny PR company with only 4 current clients. This would indicate a money problem to me. If you can't afford to pay for the 2000 lb PR gorilla, get the PR gerbil instead.
As far as Network Teleports goes.. I have a feeling that just about anyone would be better. I have a hard time placing trust in a technology based company that hasn't updated their website in over 9 years.
And on the issue of spelling, I also found that quite funny One thing I've noticed though is how many people here happen to spell huge "hugh" and doubt "dought"... makes me wonder when 3 or 4 different people all spell the same simple words incorrectly in the same way. But whatever.
-R
This has been a public service announcement from your local curmudgeon. The pps will now rise, your debt will disappear, and your genitals will grow 4".
WELL ITS GOOD TO KNOW YOU NOW WILL BE UP IN THE AVERAGE SIZE RANGE (i.e, 5.5inches)
Posts: 236 | From: IL, USA | Registered: Mar 2004
| IP: Logged |
I found this interesting, but I wouldn't read a lot into it at this point:
"That time came this weekend with the Saturday launch of Firestone Communications' Sorpresa, a digital cable network with initial carriage on Time Warner Cable, Cox and the National Cable TV Cooperative."
quote:Originally posted by RobinO: Man I love being devil's advocate
And on the issue of spelling, I also found that quite funny One thing I've noticed though is how many people here happen to spell huge "hugh" and doubt "dought"... makes me wonder when 3 or 4 different people all spell the same simple words incorrectly in the same way. But whatever.
-R
This has been a public service announcement from your local curmudgeon. The pps will now rise, your debt will disappear, and your genitals will grow 4".
________________________________________ You make a great "devil's advocate" Everyone needs one. I hope you are not picking on Bung in regards to the spelling. Poor guy doesn't deserve to be picked on.
posted
he didnt state the time zone either so he could only be off by 1/2 an hour.
quote:Originally posted by bill1352: it sure has to make ya wonder...the guy was off by only 1 1/2 hrs and that could have been the frank released it at 6 and it took that time to get posted.....350 million shares??? wouldn't that be nice...the old song you can take this job % shove it comes to mind...lol
Posts: 4801 | From: Prescott, ON, Canada | Registered: May 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
From: email@keithorr.com Re: FW: Submission from FNX website
Thanks for your interest in One In Ten. I am sorry to say that archived interviews and transcripts of interviews are not available.
We thank you for listening to the real alternative, FNX.
Keith Orr Producer/Host One In Ten Sundays from 10pm to Midnight www.fnxradio.com
> > > The following person has submitted a comment > > Name: > > To: > Comments: I understand someone did an interview > with Frank Olsen, CEO > of Q Television Network, sometime in the past 2 > weeks. Is there audio of > that available? Thanks.
Posts: 1872 | From: right here | Registered: Apr 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
it appeared some ppl tried to push it down to low .004's today but someone else held it strong. go Q holders go
Posts: 734 | Registered: Sep 2004
| IP: Logged |
... SOFT LAUNCH WHICH WAS SUPPOSED TO BE ON C-BAND AND IS SUPPOSED TO BE GOING TO THIS DAY IS NOT...
No, the soft launch is NOT supposed to still be going on. A soft launch stops when the hard launch commences. Granted, there isn't much in the way of broadcast signal to boast of, but my point is that your details are inaccurate.
quote:
...RCN VERIFIES WE ARE BROADCASTING IN SAN FRANCISCO WHICH WE ARE NOT...
You've verified this? Some claim to have seen it. I don't know them, but I trust them more than I trust you.
quote:
... WELL FUNNY, NETWORK TELEPORTS IS HAVING NOT A SINGLE PROBLEM WITH ANY OF IT'S SIGNALS...
How do you know this? Have you contacted them directly or have you viewed every station they broadcast? What is the name of the person you spoke with and what is their phone number/extension?
quote:
...SO ADVERTISERS CAN SEE IT REMEMBER...
A soft launch is not for advertisers. It is for carriers to review. You'd think that after months on here you'd learn something. Of course, you still say "notta" and "lieing", so let me put on my big surprise face....
quote:
WHAT ABOUT 2-3 WEEKS AGO WHEN THERE WAS NO HURRICANE IN SIGHT? NO WEATHER PROBLEMS THEN.
I don't recall seeing a PR that blames the hurricane. If I'm wrong, please post the link to it. There is a difference between blaming a hurricane and suspected weather problems. I can tell you that the weather here causes DAILY outages of electricity and cable tv throughout the summer months... yes, DAILY! It may be the same there or it may not be. I don't know, but don't read into what was stated.
quote:
... LISTEN HERE AND LISTEN CLEAR; YOU ARE A FRAUD AND ARE LIEING ON TOP OF LIEING ON TOP OF LIEING SOME MORE...
Self-realization?
So, as you can see, your views are not exactly truthful or accurate. Why should we believe anything you say if you lack such attention to accurate detail?
I didn't even pick apart your post completely, just superficially. You are entitled to your own views. You're even entitled to post them here, but before you spread the cancer, get the details accurate.
Posts: 1885 | From: Tampa, FL, US | Registered: Mar 2004
| IP: Logged |