i noticed some of the people figgered out what is happening...

i have to admit, it takes a lot o'guts to continue promoting a stock with this much wrong with it... or maybe you guys have no choice?????
funny thing is, if you got in at this level, the MM's are gonna get 25% of your money unless it goes up more...LOL
those evil MM's

They can't answer what is going on behind the scenes with UC and Roger.

They can't answer questions about our current OS.

They can't answer questions about the roles of the various companies involved in this play.

They can't project the pps when all of this is revealed.

All they can do is show numbers of shares traded per day and trends.

They can't show if those shares are real.

They can't show the manipulation of the numbers by the MM's.

quote:

---

Originally posted by noahltl:
Charts can't answer many questions:

They can't answer what is going on behind the scenes with UC and Roger.

They can't answer questions about our current OS.

They can't answer questions about the roles of the various companies involved in this play.

They can't project the pps when all of this is revealed.

All they can do is show numbers of shares traded per day and trends.

They can't show if those shares are real.

They can't show the manipulation of the numbers by the MM's.

Until they can, charts don't show anything about this stock that is reliable.

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by highwaychild:
Gman,DQR and all you other old school CMKX haters.When it was at .0001 you was still hating then.And then what did the pps do?Up 1000%.Leveled off @ .0003-4 for a sweet gap-up.If the news is against your will, and the pr is pretty good.Then we could see another one.Several good pr's would be okay too.

---

are you still holding????
that PR today said it all.....
more shares are going to be sold....
they spent a lot of money to sell these..(FUNNY CAR?)
they did it right up front and in the open, i never realised how many people don't get it......

that 1000% how many shares got sold???
and why???
the right PR???? LOL
the line to sell will be MILES LONG the internet might crash trying to handle it....

you guys just got millions of dollars worth of MORESTOCK.....
and it hasn't even been offered yet

RE: TODAY'S PR FOR UCAD

Mach I have decided to officially post only over here instead of the three ring circus that is now called the CMKX board. The absurdity of the bashers' posts over there are beyond my tolerance levels. I hope this does not result in the migration over from that board of the lesser elements. I hope maybe a few worthy posters follow over to your board, which is respectful and genuine I feel, and free from those with an agenda other than to debate the legitimate merits of a stock. But if for some reason some of the snakes over there follow me and this becomes a problem, please message me and I'll return to posting back at the CMKX board. Thanks Mach.

As for today's PR, at first I was pretty excited about it but only because I literally had 30 seconds to read it at the time and the possibilities immediately popped into my head of how this could be used to leverage CMKX's situation. Upon further investigation, however, I believe this is simply a funding tool for UCAD. The significance to CMKX imo is that some of this money will likely be used to close down on the remaining % of the option that UCAD has with CMKX. Only 50% of the London company's shares are locked in escrow. The other 50% I assume could be sold which could raise somewhere in the neighborhood $4.5 million to pay down on the CMKX option. Additionally, the deal is structured well. The London company's shares are restricted for 2 years. That implies some pretty solid faith in UCAD to allow 50% of the London company's shares to enter the market while having to lock up UCAD's shares fully for 2 years. And to all the bashers screaming "oh they'll just short against those restricted shares anyway to make money", you'd have to be an IDIOT to short what will likely amount to 2 million UCAD shares in the face of the impending anti-naked shorting rules. Can you even fathom having to cover 2 million shares of UCAD on the open market if the anti-naked shorting rules truly enforce delivery (a big question mark I know but if this round doesn't do it, at some point in the next 2 years, this is a REAL expectation imo). It just wouldn't be worth the risk to short against these restricted shares on a stock like UCAD that move $1 on 15k shares traded. So this deal seems to be a pretty well structured one.

Bottom line is that it seems to me to be a reasonable financing package to help UCAD both expand internally and invest in CMKX. Things COULD get very interesting if UCAD-CMKX move to a fuller merger stage. One odd possibility that I just throw out there for kicks is that upon listing on the London Stock Exchange, perhaps there could be a pink sheet equivalent traded over in the US and perhaps UCAD could decide to issue a share dividend with a portion of the London shares which would naturally flow into all of our UCAD dividend shares, leaving the market makers short on a London-based stock as well. Interesting but I HIGHLY doubt that will happen. Would be kinda cool though.

Anyway, not the big wow factor I first thought but solid news for ucad. Not every otc company gets such a fair deal on a $9 million financing. And hey, we own a huge chunk of UCAD. Nice. Not going to move CMKX and not going to create any great ripples. But nice.

Z

As always, these are my personal opinions.

quote:

---

Originally posted by glassman:
hey DQR, decided to pass on some lessons? this ought to be fun.....

---

you just got DILUTED again, and it HAS to happen again and again...just to get the mines started...

let me ask you this..if this was really a hot diamond project, why do they have to resort to unknown funding vehicles???
i see small companies every day getting loans from GE, and duPont etc.....at decent interest rates....
all that DD they did before they decided to swap shares??? LOL i'll show you mine if you show me yours...

The ONLY reason there was a spike in CMKI/ CMKM/ CMKX's price is due to the fact that in mid June their transfer agent stopped printing and distributing shares. [/B][/QUOTE]

Aren't people still getting certs issued by the TA?

quote:

---

Originally posted by noahltl:

Originally posted by DiQuiRiesco

The ONLY reason there was a spike in CMKI/ CMKM/ CMKX's price is due to the fact that in mid June their transfer agent stopped printing and distributing shares.

---

Aren't people still getting certs issued by the TA?

[This message has been edited by noahltl (edited August 20, 2004).][/B][/QUOTE]
And hence the downward spiral from that mind numbing peak of .0012

next question...

quote:

---

Originally posted by glassman:
wow...they're quiet again...this is scary...
maybe they are beginning to realise...

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by glassman:
wow...they're quiet again...this is scary...
maybe they are beginning to realise...

---

The reason it's getting quiet is because everyone has left this 'mind stimulating' banter for bed or other boards. Sounds like a good idea to me too.

quote:

---

Originally posted by penny-trader:
and you yourself are burying it take it off this board please and thank you.

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by glassman:
and i have an issue about this crap too...
penny-trader..the people who run ALLSTOCKS want postings and hits..this is real bad for biz.......
you should be ashamed...
i have had a lot of people tell me that they have been treated this way here....

---

Forgetting the word "and" should be worthy of twenty dollars though.

quote:

---

Originally posted by noahltl:
And yoo have contributed WHAT to this board?

---

the proper correlation between the issue should be compared in dollars..
cmkx dividend=35.5million$ versus 9 million dollars......
1/4 give or take......not as bad as i assumed, but. that doesn't change the fact that there will be more of this in order to mine...maybe they will SELL some claims to raise money too, but that will decrease the net value of the CMKX portfolio.....
this should allow UCAD to continue to pay for the extra 10% of CMKX claims......

I read through the comments that took at least one page and didn't add much. I did see one post that compared CMKX to AFRR/AFRT and some other heavily diluted stocks. The comparison fails on 2 levels at least. The first one is CMKX has way more shares Authorized and Most likely issued and outstanding shares than AFRT or just about any other stock does. (I know I should get an AMEN on that from Glassman). The second place where the comparison fails is that CMKX owns the mineral rights in the diamond mining hot spot of this century. Right now if there are 483 Billion shares outstanding and the share price is .0004 the company is valued at $200 Million Dollars. That is a high valuation if they have nothing. But they have quite a bit. Which I will recount in a moment. First back to the .0004 price. We own the mineral rights to 1.4 Million acres in this diamond hot spot. DeBeers small acreage has been said to be worth $40-80 Billion Dollars. The people who try to multiply our acreage times the pro rata valuation of DeBeers claims are not being realistic. But we know that we have hundreds of kimberlite pipes from the same volcanic activity that formed the DeBeers pipes and the Star Kimberlite pipe (both of which are right next to our claims 5-6 miles); and then think we won't have at least on diamond bearing Mother Lode claim worth at least $40 Billion Dollars is extremely short sighted. One Billion Dollars with our Present Share Count would bring the PPS to .002. A huge return. I think we can safely multiply that by 40. I am not saying that will happen tomorrow or even this year. But I am very confident that it will happen.

Our aerial survey revealed hundreds of magnetic anomolies. We have incredible kimberlite finds and the percentage which are diamondiferous in the this area is very high. We have had offers (PR's released earlie this year and last) from public companies looking to buy some of our claims. We have a lawyer who is very good at putting together mergers and Acquistions and arranging funding.

We probably have other minerals worth mining on those 1.4 million acres. Mining is the largest industry in the area and uranium, zinc and gold are known to exist in neighboring claims.

I have heard the claims that this is a scam. I don't believe that. I don't believe Roger Glenn would be part of a scam. Not for one second. I think he and his law firm who represent Harvard University and Massachusetts Mutual and 298 other top companies would not want their good name associated with a pink sheet scandal and neither would I.

I liked this excerpt from a post I saw on another board. It talks about the PR and what I especially thought worth thinking about is that to naked short the acquired UCAD shares with the new anti shorting legislation coming would equate to financial suicide. Here is that post:

As for today's PR, at first I was pretty excited about it but only because I literally had 30 seconds to read it at the time and the possibilities immediately popped into my head of how this could be used to leverage CMKX's situation. Upon further investigation, however, I believe this is simply a funding tool for UCAD. The significance to CMKX imo is that some of this money will likely be used to close down on the remaining % of the option that UCAD has with CMKX. Only 50% of the London company's shares are locked in escrow. The other 50% I assume could be sold which could raise somewhere in the neighborhood $4.5 million to pay down on the CMKX option. Additionally, the deal is structured well. The London company's shares are restricted for 2 years. That implies some pretty solid faith in UCAD to allow 50% of the London company's shares to enter the market while having to lock up UCAD's shares fully for 2 years. And to all the bashers screaming "oh they'll just short against those restricted shares anyway to make money", you'd have to be an IDIOT to short what will likely amount to 2 million UCAD shares in the face of the impending anti-naked shorting rules. Can you even fathom having to cover 2 million shares of UCAD on the open market if the anti-naked shorting rules truly enforce delivery (a big question mark I know but if this round doesn't do it, at some point in the next 2 years, this is a REAL expectation imo). It just wouldn't be worth the risk to short against these restricted shares on a stock like UCAD that move $1 on 15k shares traded. So this deal seems to be a pretty well structured one.

Bottom line is that it seems to me to be a reasonable financing package to help UCAD both expand internally and invest in CMKX. Things COULD get very interesting if UCAD-CMKX move to a fuller merger stage. One odd possibility that I just throw out there for kicks is that upon listing on the London Stock Exchange, perhaps there could be a pink sheet equivalent traded over in the US and perhaps UCAD could decide to issue a share dividend with a portion of the London shares which would naturally flow into all of our UCAD dividend shares, leaving the market makers short on a London-based stock as well. Interesting but I HIGHLY doubt that will happen. Would be kinda cool though.

Anyway, not the big wow factor I first thought but solid news for ucad. Not every otc company gets such a fair deal on a $9 million financing. And hey, we own a huge chunk of UCAD. Nice. Not going to move CMKX and not going to create any great ripples. But nice.

Z

As always, these are my personal opinions.

Hopefully nobody in here is investing anything but "fun" money that they can afford to gamble with.
---------------------------------------------
That is my opinion and is based on some clear headed, thinking after evaluating the facts. I think that with a little patience this will turn out to be a very successful endeavor and investment. The fact is that there is a lot of hype with this company. I like the excitement that it generates. If a portion of it is true -this will be wild. The equal fact is there is a ton of bashing on this stock. The 'good guys' trying to protect the innocent here are driving their audience to other boards where they can see both sides of the issue. It isn't even good drama. I try not to enter into the name calling and to not do that I just need to avoid posting here. I won't be responding to negative posts as much as is humanly possible. (I confess that I am weak and I want to retaliate).

The people you are "preaching" to know all of this, but somehow, some way, they don't want to "see the light". This may be because they get paid to be such ignorant fools (in which case being a natural ignorant fool should be a good pre-requisite for the job), or they just enjoy doing what they do (either because they're disgruntled (ex) stockholders, or because they had some traumatic experiences during their childhoods). Either way, they can't be helped. I have learned how to spot them and I have learned to ignore them. Like I said yesterday, skipping over their posts is much like skipping over a turd on the ground.