quote:Originally posted by Wallace#1: Noticed Brad omitted the "or today" part in his question. Go back and look at all the past posts since that dividend was declared.
Ok, I'll rephrase the question. Who suggested it would be out yesterday or today. Not sure why that mattered but ok. I don't have time to back and look at all the posts again. I've read them once already. Very time consuming I might add.
I do think there was much speculation on when the share structure of the company would be released. I believe that most of us have said though that Roger and UC would release that information when it makes sense to release. Obviously it's not time yet.
Remember, that's OK with most of us. It's a non-reporting pink with risks that we all agreed was worth it for the price.
posted
Don't know what you are referring to "child", but you most certainly are in the CULT club. As to your investments, they are your choices and your problems. And that includes UCAD which just lost you about two thirds of it's value - IF THE DEAL GOES THROUGH. GLTU
posted
Folks.. With my enormous experience on Wall st, I can help anybody on this thread (for free). Please let me know if you need me. I am available all day all night on this thread. I am just bored with my Wall st. experience, don't know where to pass this knowledge. So i just stay on these boards to help people. You know I don't have anybody at home that listens to me even tho I am soo old. So Pleeeeease let me help you.
[This message has been edited by TruthTeller (edited August 19, 2004).]
posted
Hey child: Want some gold, copper, silver, and other stuff to go with your diamonds. Check out FMNJ, do a little digging let me know what you think.
quote:Originally posted by highwaychild: If you are talking about me Wally, I am not pumping.Can't I just be excited about my investment?This has been alot of fun for me.I'm getting shares of UCAD Sept. 24(payout date) just for owning 6 mil. shares of CMKX a couple days ago.Buy one get one free is a good enough deal for me.That'll make #3-4 diamond companys I'm in on(give or take GEMM) + one not associated with the crew.
Posts: 4893 | From: Burbank IL USA | Registered: Feb 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
I personally am not worried about the value of UCAD today. We can't trade them for a year anyway. That's when I'll be concerned about the value.
Posts: 247 | From: Austin, TX | Registered: Jul 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
Well now, smart, ethical, intelligent Roger has been around for quite a while now, right? What exactly has he accomplished to date?
To date, and in my opinion, nothing either Roger or UC has done makes sense. Please give me one GOOD (excellent not required) example which cannot be counter argued.
posted
You keep this up Wallace, and I'm going to sentence you to two weeks in Sterling's classroom. lol Don't laugh glass, I'll make you go too. lol
quote:Originally posted by Wallace#1: Well now, smart, ethical, intelligent Roger has been around for quite a while now, right? What exactly has he accomplished to date?
To date, and in my opinion, nothing either Roger or UC has done makes sense. Please give me one GOOD (excellent not required) example which cannot be counter argued.
Posts: 4893 | From: Burbank IL USA | Registered: Feb 2004
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Wallace#1: Well now, smart, ethical, intelligent Roger has been around for quite a while now, right? What exactly has he accomplished to date?
To date, and in my opinion, nothing either Roger or UC has done makes sense. Please give me one GOOD (excellent not required) example which cannot be counter argued.
We don't know what we don't know. We can't argue that he hasn't done anything anymore than we can argue that he has.
At least his background brings credibility to an otherwise non-reporting pink sheet company.
posted
OK, gmac78, so where were you before you began pumping on this CMKX thread?
Posts: 3607 | From: NJ - Outside Phila. | Registered: Mar 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
Geez, Will, you are right. That would be just as bad as being on this thread. Do you think he gets his material from here? Glass might like it though! LOL
Posts: 3607 | From: NJ - Outside Phila. | Registered: Mar 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
Truthteller-good to know. Thanks for the offer and I'm sure you will be taken up on it. Nice to have someone with your experience along for the ride!
Posts: 78 | Registered: Apr 2004
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by bckibler: Truthteller-good to know. Thanks for the offer and I'm sure you will be taken up on it. Nice to have someone with your experience along for the ride!
Umm, you know that was sarcasm don't you? He was role playing for another poster.
quote:Originally posted by Wallace#1: OK, gmac78, so where were you before you began pumping on this CMKX thread?
Come on Wallace, thats weak! I've only made a few posts, and nothing that could be construed as close to "pumping". I just get a little tired of having to scroll through your cr$p to get to anything interesting. Most of us are willing to wait on news!! I guess thats a scarey thought for you who has very little time left until the "light" comes on!!! LOL
posted
Brad, as far as arguing anything, I CAN argue that since he has been with UC and CMKX I have seen nothing he has accomplished. Can you tell me of anything to the contrary?
As far as his credibility is concerned I am not entirely sure of that either. All I have ever seen is what he or his law firm put on his own resume. How do you know if maybe 20 other lawyers didn't work on those same projects as well? How do you know if they might have been a bit exaggerated as is done on most resumes? No, I am not convinced. I do know that I never heard of him or of his firm and I worked with the top outside counsels (law firms) every day. I do know that his firm settled in a suit for not performing their fiduciary responsibilities.
posted
No, gmac, the crap you have to scroll through is all the garbage reposted here by one of the CMKX CULT's main pumpers. There is another pumper that does that frequently as well. REAL DD!!!
I am telling you that if I read all that stuff about the investment firm and UCAD correctly, that anyone holding CMKX shares should really question the value of those dividends.
"light"??? As in "let there be light"? LOL Sure, as much light as you have seen from UC, Glenn, Melvin and CMKX to date?
[This message has been edited by Wallace#1 (edited August 19, 2004).]
posted
All interesting Wallace but not anything to suggest that Roger isn't the real deal. People that are not top performers aren't usually made partners in their firm. He also had a role in creating the Sarbanes-Oxley Act I believe (maybe you can help me find that info) which adds even more to his credibility if you ask me.
Posts: 247 | From: Austin, TX | Registered: Jul 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
Brad, the only reason someone becomes a partner in a law firm is because they bring in the client $$$$$$$s to the law firm. In most cases that is because of contacts, not because of credibility. All the law firms care about is "show me the money".
[This message has been edited by Wallace#1 (edited August 19, 2004).]
posted
I just got a letter from TD Waterhouse when I got home from out of town. This is what it says.
CORPORATE ACTION NOTICE August 9, 2004
Security Held: CMKM Diamonds Inc. CUSIP: 125809103 Corporate Action Event: Stock Distribution Record Date: August 20, 2004 Payable Date: September 24, 2004
Terms and condiations
We have received notification that the company has declared a stock distribution, which is effected by the issuance to shareholders as of record date, 0.0000155 of a restricted share of US Canadian Minerals Inc. for each common share of CMKM Diamonds Inc. held. The status of fractional shares has yet to be determined.
As this Corporate Action may impact your investment portfolio, we would suggest you carefully read this notice. You may wish to consult you tax advisor as there may be tax consequences regard this security. Should you require clarification on the terms or conditions, please contact your accound representative by telephone. Please note that the information contained in this notice is compiled from sources belived to be reliable, but not guaranteed.
------------------ kjs69
Are you addicted when Allstocks.com is your homepage?
quote:Originally posted by Wallace#1: No, gmac, the crap you have to scroll through is all the garbage reposted here by one of the CMKX CULT's main pumpers. There is another pumper that does that frequently as well. REAL DD!!!
[This message has been edited by Wallace#1 (edited August 19, 2004).]
By Jove, I think he's talking about me. Can't remember when I've been prouder. A top Wall Street guru is recognizing little ole' me.
Newbies Uncle Wally is here to help you. Don't you all feel your knowledge of this investment growing every time he speaks?
[This message has been edited by noahltl (edited August 19, 2004).]
Posts: 2 | From: Noblesville, IN | Registered: Oct 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
Looks like noahltl's CMKX CULT shorts are showing. LOL -------------------------------------------- Have things to do now, folks. Talk to you later.
[This message has been edited by Wallace#1 (edited August 19, 2004).]
quote:Originally posted by Wallace#1: Brad, as far as arguing anything, I CAN argue that since he has been with UC and CMKX I have seen nothing he has accomplished. Can you tell me of anything to the contrary?
As far as his credibility is concerned I am not entirely sure of that either. All I have ever seen is what he or his law firm put on his own resume. How do you know if maybe 20 other lawyers didn't work on those same projects as well? How do you know if they might have been a bit exaggerated as is done on most resumes? No, I am not convinced. I do know that I never heard of him or of his firm and I worked with the top outside counsels (law firms) every day. I do know that his firm settled in a suit for not performing their fiduciary responsibilities.
Wallce, can you name those top outside cousels (law firms) you've worked with and in what capacity you worked for them?
posted
Maybe this is an appropriate repost to break the gridlock here:
Author Topic: When our lives are coming to an end. READ THIS! (Read 162 times)
ninja
When our lives are coming to an end. READ THIS! « Thread started on: Today at 9:30pm »
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Will we REALLY care about that minute timeframe in which we awaited what we had thought at the time to be the WORLDS GREATEST PR?
Or will you be thinking about how beautiful and energetic this life of 5-sensory magic was?, How beautiful it is to wake up in the morning before the sun comes up, fresh dew on the ground, silence everywhere, experiencing the serene oneness of the universe and you?, How beautiful it was to LOVE others you were close to and how the touching of other's lives brought more fullness and beauty to yours?
There is NO need to 'stress out' over what UC did or didn't do, when the PR will be coming, what the O/S might be, etc. Everything in life is perfectly placed. We are in CMKX at this moment in time for a reason, and I can only see that as being a GOOD thing. Trust in this fact and let it go! Keep doing DD, keep discussing, keep everything, JUST DON'T cause harm to yourselves by 'stressing out' or taking out agressions on others, there is NO NEED for that!
Folks, THE PRs WILL COME! Trust in that! THEY WILL BE BIG! Trust in that!
The only ONE THING in this life that we have a limited quantity of is TIME! Please use yours wisely. In every instance of your existance, be in truth, speak it, live it, help others, avoid conflict, avoid harmful situations, and realize that life is a magic adventure that we all are on.
SO LETS ENJOY IT!
Posts: 2 | From: Noblesville, IN | Registered: Oct 2004
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Wallace#1: Speaking of feathers, look at all the fluff (aka spin, speculation, rumor and assumption) all the pumpers are putting into the thread. They are quite easily named...just look at the last two days postings. Most are there as clear as day.
How about just one of you putting some spin on why the O/S was not released yesterday or today as you all suggested would happen?
[This message has been edited by Wallace#1 (edited August 19, 2004).]
[This message has been edited by Wallace#1 (edited August 19, 2004).]
Here's my spin on why the OS was not released today.
They were not released today because the company decided that today was not the time to release it. They also, probably decided to call Wallace and ask him when he thought it would be a good time to release the information. I also believe, that even if they did relese the OS, Wallace & his Glassman would dispute that total by quoting DD they have uncovered from their own posts. Additionally, if any PR came from CMKX that did not say that the share price would be $5 by next Wednesday, then Wallace and Glassman would then be able to tell us..."I told you so."
quote:Originally posted by glassman: anyway, i really do wish al of you the best of luck with al your stocks... i and quite a few others try real hard to find the next big run....look around once in awhile.... this one should be played by buying waht you are COMFORTABLE to lose and take it off your watchlist... read the statements monthly--in a few years, you might get rich, me, i'll wait til it goes to a filing exchange and maybe buy some (right before the big run--LOL)
Hall of fame quote by Glassman. Almost perfect. Thanks
posted
Its funny how Glassman disappears, and poof appears Wallace. We can look at the old posts and figure out their office hours...
Posts: 212 | Registered: Jan 2004
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by DiQuiRiesco: [QUOTE]Originally posted by noahltl: [b] See what I mean. You just can't buy knowledge like this anywhere. And we get it for free.
Looks like another night like last night. Tag Team bashing. Out goes glassman in comes Wallace.
posted
Noah, is this a straight act or do you really want to know?????
i mean you must have figured out what i was telling you last night by now, if you didn't already know..... the funny part is that i told you what was going to happen with thte shells two weeks ago, but you didn't listen then either...
Topic Closed
UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!
Printer-friendly view of this topic
