posted
AID 1.42...up .07 today but very low volume
Just happen to catch this on Motley Fool:
September 05, 2006 11:53 AM ET Who Will TASER Buy?
Stocks mentioned in this article Law Enforcement Associates Corporation (AID) Stock Quote, Chart, News TASER International, Inc. (TASR) Stock Quote, Chart, News
Motley Fool All Motley Fool News
Maybe I'm crazy, but as an investor, I simply can't help but notice the small stuff. That's why, when Reuters interviewed TASER International CEO Rick Smith about the retirement of his father, Phillips, from his role as chairman, I zeroed in on this statement:
"He also said the company may look to make some acquisitions with its roughly $50 million in cash."
To paraphrase my favorite TV character at the moment, Jeremy Piven's Ari Gold from Entourage: Really, Rick? Really?
Which competitor actually has something worth buying? BESTEX has a barely comprehensible website and an outdated library of schoolyard put-downs. Stinger Systems' stun guns apparently lack sting. And Law Enforcement Associates is in trouble with the law.
Exactly none of these firms possess a technology that would dramatically improve TASER's stun guns. But one, Law Enforcement Associates, could open more doors at the U.S. military.
Unlike its long-hoped-for-but-never-delivered stun guns, LEA derives modest revenue from sales of surveillance and detection equipment to the military. Not that it's a great business, mind you. Restatements wouldn't be in order if it were. Nevertheless, someone at the Pentagon likes LEA enough to give its bread-and-butter technology a shot. Rick may want to buy his way through that door, TASER pistol in hand.
But is that contact worth at least $36.4 million, which equals the approximate enterprise value of LEA as I write? I can't see how. It hasn't been able to keep pace with last year's sales through the first six months of 2006. Shrinking revenue doesn't exactly bode well for future earnings growth.
TASER certainly has the cash to fund a buyout, even after subtracting the $15 million in cash it could pay to settle a class action suit with shareholders. But the mere existence of that moola doesn't make an acquisition a good strategy, especially if TASER's current competitors are among the prospective targets. Be careful, Rick.
A stunning array of related Foolishness is at your disposal:
* TASER is already trying to buy its way to the front line. * It's also paying off shareholders. * But that might not be necessary if TASER did a better job of telling the truth.
TASER International is a Motley Fool Rule Breakers selection. Get more insight on the company with David Gardner's no-holds-barred interview with new company chairman Tom Smith. All that's required is a 30-day tryout of the Rule Breakers service. There's no obligation to buy and it's easy to get started. Justclick here now.
Fool contributor Tim Beyers isn't easily shocked, but he's pretty sure a TASER shot would do the trick. Tim didn't own shares in any of the companies mentioned in this story at the time of publication. Get the skinny on everything Tim is invested in by checking his Fool profile. The Motley Fool has an ironclad disclosure policy.
Copyright 2006 Motley Fool
Don't buy on my opinion and don't risk what you CAN'T lose!
Posts: 199 | From: Tennessee | Registered: Apr 2006
| IP: Logged |
UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!
Printer-friendly view of this topic
