posted
I dont think you missed anything Tex. Just some "gut feeling" posts it looks like. A Monday morning PR regarding the weeks events sure would be nice though. But, as others have stated, only if the weeks events are newsworthy.
Since we are expecting the ammended 10k and the 10q and it also seems everyone is tuned into the idea of a new CEO soon i guess its tough not to have the same gut feeling.
Posts: 2308 | From: Michigan | Registered: Jun 2006
| IP: Logged |
FinancialWire received a confidential email between a reporter and Stuart Z. Goldstein, Managing Director of Corporate Communications for the Depository Trust and Clearing Corp. in which Goldstein was represented as denying that a lawsuit filed by Nanopierce Technologies (OTCBB: NPCT) exists.
The chief spokesperson for the DTCC, whose board of directors represent a who's who of financial entities, including Lehman Brothers (NYSE: LEH), Citigroup / Solomon Smith Barney's Corporate Investment Bank (NYSE: C), and Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MWD), was quoted as stating that the "lawsuit" did not exist and was simply "charges being leveled by internet crackpots."
FinancialWire sent Goldstein a scanned copy of the actual court filing, which occurred April 29 at 12:15 p.m., and asked Goldstein if he or the DTCC still denied its existence or had any comments. No response was received.
The lawsuit alleges that the Depository Trust and Clearing Corp. has a lot of reasons, almost one billion of them a year, to keep illegal naked short selling in operation. It was the proverbial shot across the bow by the legendary Houston law firms of Christian, Smith, Wukoson and Jewell, and O'Quinn, Laminack and Pirtle, whose notches already include environmental targets, the breast implant industry and the tobacco industry, all brought to their knees.
.....
Recently, leading market makers and brokers named in various lawsuits and other actions, including FleetBoston (NYSE: FBF), Goldman, Sachs & Co. (NYSE: GS), H. Myerson & Co., Inc. (NASDAQ: MHMY), Olde / H&R Block (NYSE: HRB), Charles Schwab (NYSE: SCH), Toronto-Dominion's (NYSE: TD), TD Waterhouse Group and vFinance, Inc. (OTCBB: VFIN). A.G. Edwards, Inc. (NYSE: AGE), Ameritrade Holding Corp. (NASDAQ: AMTD), Deutsche Bank AG (NYSE: DB), and ETrade Group, Inc. (NYSE: ET), were given a "reprieve" were forced to comply with new short-selling market regulations imposed by the NASD after the SEC had "sat on" the NASD request to plug material loopholes for almost 2-1/2 years.
"The new rules expand the scope of the affirmative determination requirements to include orders received from broker/dealers that are not members of NASD ("non-member broker/dealers"). ...
Meanwhile, CBS Marketwatch, a venture between Marketwatch (NASDAQ: MKTW) and Viacom's (NYSE: V) CBS unit, has suggested that victims of securities fraud may be able to file for theft claims on tax returns instead of capital losses.
The scandal has embroiled hundreds of companies and dozens of brokers and marketmakers, in a web of international intrigue, manipulative short-selling and cross-border accusations and denials.
Some 122 companies, including 13 brokers, such as FleetBoston (NYSE: FBF), Goldman, Sachs & Co. (NYSE: GS), H. Myerson & Co., Inc. (NASDAQ: MHMY), Olde / H&R Block (NYSE: HRB), Charles Schwab (NYSE: SCH), Toronto-Dominion's (NYSE: TD), TD Waterhouse Group and vFinance, Inc. (OTCBB: VFIN). A.G. Edwards, Inc. (NYSE: AGE), Ameritrade Holding Corp. (NASDAQ: AMTD), Deutsche Bank AG (NYSE: DB), and ETrade Group, Inc. (NYSE: ET), have been embroiled for over a year in a raging controversy
The remaining 109 companies among the 122 named to date have issued press releases or been named in the media as having been victimized, or as taking various actions, either alone or in concert with other companies, to oppose manipulative trading in the form of illegal naked short selling. The actions have ranged from lawsuits to withdrawals and threatened withdrawals from the electronic trading system managed by the Depository Trust & Clearing Corp., to withdrawals from toxic financings, to the issuance of dividends or name changes designed to squeeze manipulators, to joining associations or networks or to contacting regulatory authorities to provide documentation of abuses or otherwise complain.
quote:Originally posted by stocktrader2006: Oh wait a minute....her backside is dripping with brown.......Good Lord!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Stock, I saw this and just HAD to comment...unless they have been snuggled under a heavy blanket, you can usually tell a fever by feeling their stomach...head doesn't tell as much on a baby (nurse told me that tip).
I can beat this one though...I'm sick with bronchitis (the five prescription variety) and my 9 month old decided to start projectile vomiting...in his bed...last night. Hope you survived - you are a good Daddy sounds like!
-------------------- Study before you buy, Sell before you think about it.... Posts: 3903 | From: Gulf Coast | Registered: Jun 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
On a more pertinent note to the thread...I got another acknowledgement letter from my congressman yesterday regarding my complaints. He, too, has contacted the SEC...I'm 2 of 3 so far!
-------------------- Study before you buy, Sell before you think about it.... Posts: 3903 | From: Gulf Coast | Registered: Jun 2006
| IP: Logged |
a letter that should be forwarded to every single member in politics every single day.
uh is it saturday.
BUMP
surfer, that is one helluva letter - whoever put it together must have spent hours researching and drafting it. wow!
Posts: 603 | From: Plymouth, MN | Registered: Jun 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
Wow, thats more than a letter! That goes LINKS deep on some of its points. Thats intense.
Posts: 2308 | From: Michigan | Registered: Jun 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
Why do people constantly think that if we have a high book value it will be realized. The issue is not what were valued at, it is how the market views this company (the court of public opinion) If Mike A. continues to drag his feet we will go the way of NDOL,AURC, SPRL etc., companies that had good runs but dropped to only a fraction of thier alleged book value because they didnt respond fast enough.
I know this goes against most of the boards beliefs, but I'm sure most of you bought penny stocks before and you all know that most of the hyped penny stocks never reach their book value. We must remember these are employees of a public company (they work for us) and they must be accountable and they should be judged according. Blindly defending all of the leaderships steps is never going to make this company reach its full potential. We must question what is good for the company and voice it to our leaders.
Posts: 47 | Registered: Oct 2006
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by etouqe123: Why do people constantly think that if we have a high book value it will be realized. The issue is not what were valued at, it is how the market views this company (the court of public opinion) If Mike A. continues to drag his feet we will go the way of NDOL,AURC, SPRL etc., companies that had good runs but dropped to only a fraction of thier alleged book value because they didnt respond fast enough.
I know this goes against most of the boards beliefs, but I'm sure most of you bought penny stocks before and you all know that most of the hyped penny stocks never reach their book value. We must remember these are employees of a public company (they work for us) and they must be accountable and they should be judged according. Blindly defending all of the leaderships steps is never going to make this company reach its full potential. We must question what is good for the company and voice it to our leaders.
Posts: 386 | From: Plano, TX | Registered: Oct 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
Have to agree with you here...And at this time, it is very important that the Company keeps shareholders and future shareholders informed. The book value is not what the PPS will reflect, the PPS will reflect the investors perception and I am hoping that the company comes through and brings all to light so that perhaps perceptions of this stock can move forward with the company and the PPS. the 15th is arriving quickly and may very well be the turning point for this stock. IMO
quote:Originally posted by etouqe123: Why do people constantly think that if we have a high book value it will be realized. The issue is not what were valued at, it is how the market views this company (the court of public opinion) If Mike A. continues to drag his feet we will go the way of NDOL,AURC, SPRL etc., companies that had good runs but dropped to only a fraction of thier alleged book value because they didnt respond fast enough.
I know this goes against most of the boards beliefs, but I'm sure most of you bought penny stocks before and you all know that most of the hyped penny stocks never reach their book value. We must remember these are employees of a public company (they work for us) and they must be accountable and they should be judged according. Blindly defending all of the leaderships steps is never going to make this company reach its full potential. We must question what is good for the company and voice it to our leaders.
-------------------- #1 Rule: Protect your capital! #2 Rule: Never fall for the BS on the boards! Posts: 8890 | Registered: Jan 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
Kind of a canned response but someone IS checking the investor relations email with CSHD:
Quote: Originally Posted by texasex05 We are currently working on the court case with the SEC. We must be careful in the communications that we put out. We are in a transitional phase with the company but we are very confident that we can pull through this. I understand your concerns but hopefully you can understand the delicate position we are in. Thank you for your continued support
-----Original Message----- From: xxxx xxxxxx [mailto:xxxxxxx*xxxxxx.xxx] Sent: Friday, November 10, 2006 05:41 PM To: investorrelations*cshd.us Subject: Concerned shareholder...
Hello, I would just like to express my concern regarding the lack of communication between the company and shareholders at this time. My investment is down 70% with no sign from the company that we will rebound. I'm sure you understand my concerns.
Thanks, xxxx xxxxxx shareholder
-------------------- Got CSHD? Its fun Posts: 766 | From: Washington, DC | Registered: Sep 2006
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by frank021474: Kind of a canned response but someone IS checking the investor relations email with CSHD:
Quote: Originally Posted by texasex05 We are currently working on the court case with the SEC. We must be careful in the communications that we put out. We are in a transitional phase with the company but we are very confident that we can pull through this. I understand your concerns but hopefully you can understand the delicate position we are in. Thank you for your continued support
-----Original Message----- From: xxxx xxxxxx [mailto:xxxxxxx*xxxxxx.xxx] Sent: Friday, November 10, 2006 05:41 PM To: investorrelations*cshd.us Subject: Concerned shareholder...
Hello, I would just like to express my concern regarding the lack of communication between the company and shareholders at this time. My investment is down 70% with no sign from the company that we will rebound. I'm sure you understand my concerns.
Thanks, xxxx xxxxxx shareholder
Frank if you don't mind sharing who responded to you??
Posts: 6410 | Registered: Jul 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
Rufus is on spr now (Live I think) with Andrew in Iraq. He is talking about the powerpoint he made and is sending the caller a copy.
Posts: 551 | From: FL | Registered: Apr 2006
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by GreenDay: Rufus is on spr now (Live I think) with Andrew in Iraq. He is talking about the powerpoint he made and is sending the caller a copy.
It's not live, its a replay from a few days back
Posts: 228 | From: Denver | Registered: Oct 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
Thanks Spooky! I guess this "SubPennyRadio - Wed 110806 Archive [563:07]" from the site means it is from Wednesday.
Posts: 551 | From: FL | Registered: Apr 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
Isn't RyanPDF or something like that over in Iraq? Any of you over there.. PM me with address - I'm inspired to send a "care" package.
Posts: 551 | From: FL | Registered: Apr 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
I'm suprised the mods haven't made us start a new thread since we are on pg 124. Does anyone have a suggestion for the "subject" line of a new thread?
-------------------- Success is having the time and money to enjoy all of life's wonders... Posts: 2083 | Registered: Nov 2005
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by RichBy26: I'm suprised the mods haven't made us start a new thread since we are on pg 124. Does anyone have a suggestion for the "subject" line of a new thread?
"CSHD - from Grey to Gold"?
Posts: 228 | From: Denver | Registered: Oct 2006
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by 3403: She's my neighbor..
She is not your neighbor. Yes that is my daughter in the picture with her sister. Jenna is the blond. Stop the BS.
Posts: 557 | From: UpState New York | Registered: Sep 2006
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by RichBy26: I'm suprised the mods haven't made us start a new thread since we are on pg 124. Does anyone have a suggestion for the "subject" line of a new thread?
sure...
"CSHD: Facts only, No Conjecture"
seems to me, that would limit both "pumpers" and "bashers," eh?
quote:Originally posted by etouqe123: Why do people constantly think that if we have a high book value it will be realized. The issue is not what were valued at, it is how the market views this company (the court of public opinion) If Mike A. continues to drag his feet we will go the way of NDOL,AURC, SPRL etc., companies that had good runs but dropped to only a fraction of thier alleged book value because they didnt respond fast enough.
I know this goes against most of the boards beliefs, but I'm sure most of you bought penny stocks before and you all know that most of the hyped penny stocks never reach their book value. We must remember these are employees of a public company (they work for us) and they must be accountable and they should be judged according. Blindly defending all of the leaderships steps is never going to make this company reach its full potential. We must question what is good for the company and voice it to our leaders.
I agree with you. You are very accurate with this. We need to voice what is good to Mike.
Posts: 557 | From: UpState New York | Registered: Sep 2006
| IP: Logged |