posted
There exists no doubt all participants at stock discussion boards have noted this severe absence of women participants. There are a number of primary reasons for this refusal of women to participate at male dominated discussion boards. Those reasons are clear and quite easy to discern. Nonetheless, when men are presented with those reasons, men will refuse to acknowledge the validity of those reasons.
I achieved a goal last Friday and have now set a higher goal. Our family enjoys four brokerage accounts. I manage all four. One is for my dear husband. Another for our girl. An account for myself which is simply for play and finally an IRA account to ensure our retirement. Decades back I set a goal of earning ten-million dollars by the turn-of-the-century. I missed my mark; I am six years overdue but then, how could I anticipate the nine-eleven tragedy?
Last Friday the collective net worth of our accounts finally exceeded my set goal for this recent turn-of-the-century.
Who wants to be a millionaire? I could make each of you a millionaire within one year.
Over the past twenty years I have cultivated and grown knowledge, expertise, experience and significant networking connections inside this world of financials, especially within this collective group we label Wall Street.
Who wants to be a millionaire?
This will never happen by my hand; women have no place in the stock markets.
Dr. Kiralynne Schilitubi Professor of English
Posts: 7504 | Registered: Dec 2003
| IP: Logged |
posted
I do whale...Geez whale, you 'been doing some feeding..Nice job.
'had a hunch all along....'been round Millionares in the Sportsfishing/ commercial fishing and logging industries...
The self made ones I have as friends are top notch people..Most? you would never know they were millionares..
Some that I do and have worked with in Hawaii can be a real pain in the arse..Specialy the one who had it handed to him thru inheritence.
Posts: 10729 | From: oregon | Registered: Feb 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
I am a thousandaire. I could teack you how to be one of those too.
Anyone interested? It'll only cost you $1000 dollars!!!
Seriously,
if you are talkin about yourself there Purl...way to go!
You see me making mistakes feel free to PM me and let me know! Id'love to be able to say I broke a goal like that.
The Bigfoot
oops! Still getting used to my new name.
-------------------- No longer eligible for government service due to lack of tax issues. Posts: 5178 | From: Up North | Registered: Dec 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
Women are significantly better traders and investors than are men. This is a direct result of our feminine mind.
Men solve or resolve challenges in life through fisticuffs, either verbal or physical. Women accomplish the same through negotiation.
A masculine mind insists on all circumstances to be "his" way, which is controlled, to a degree, by a fragile masculine ego swayed by influences of testosterone aggression.
This is evidenced, in part, by observation of masculine behavior during stock discussions. A man is quick to insult, quick to threaten and will not consider an opinion of another, male or female. In his mind, his opinion is always right and those who question his opinion are immediately subjected to combative debate. If this fails, inappropriate aggressive behavior is displayed by the male; bantam rooster.
Should a male perceive he has lost his debate with others, he will immediately fall to blaming others, often while whining and complaining. A man cannot handle rejection. A man will engage in denial before accepting responsibility.
Men are lesser talented at working stock markets because, when presented with research material, a man will rationalize that material into what he wants it to be; must agree with his wants. Men are very quick to manipulate research into a model which comfortably fits masculine thinking. Most often, this model is incorrect leading to lesser profits or losses.
Women are superior at working the markets because we negotiate our research material. We view our findings in a realistic fashion, then proceed to negotiate a chosen end result. We weigh what is presented then develop various options for a mutually equitable resolution. A company has set its goal, a woman sets her goal, then she effects a series of compromises which will garner her intended objective. Women settle for less, make less profits but make profits far more frequently than will a man, given the same circumstances.
During stock discussions, men will engage in mutual ego masturbation to bolster confidence when men are in agreement. Men do not consider if their arrived decisions are correct, men consider if other men accept their decisions. End result is men mold research to fit what they want, then seek masculine peer group approval which creates a false sense of being correct.
Women, contrasting, are independent thinkers and in little need of peer group approval. We arrive at our decisions, after debating within our minds if we are correct, then test our decisions for validity. If valid, we move ahead. If problems are discovered with our thinking, we retrace and think again; we compromise and negotiate.
Women are not welcomed at stock discussion boards and we are mindful of this. These boards are always dominated by men. Inherently, men cannot accept and will not accept contrary opinions by women. Men view women as inferior, feel no need to be combative; simple dismissal of "weak" women.
When confronted with assertive feminine logic, a man will resort to personal insults, threats and other illogical devices of combat lacking any effective basis for argument because this man has molded reality to fit his fantasy. When confronted with logical feminine thinking, a man realizes his position falls apart quickly leaving him only an option of Ad Hominem, which is the foremost logical fallacy.
Stock discussion boards are a very poor resource for quality information. Boards are dominated by masculine thinking which is sorely less than adequate. These boards are littered with male created logical fallicies, more appropriate, reality twisted into a fantasy molded to what is acceptable within a masculine mind.
I could make each of you a millionaire in a year but this not possible because you are men.
Dr. Kiralynne Schilitubi Professor of English
Posts: 7504 | Registered: Dec 2003
| IP: Logged |
I think this is that part where I insult you now. LOL
-------------------- No longer eligible for government service due to lack of tax issues. Posts: 5178 | From: Up North | Registered: Dec 2005
| IP: Logged |
However, you are a man and are incapable of molding my words into a model which is both acceptable to your masculine mind and is acceptable to your masculine ego. You display highly stereotypical masculine thinking by immediately rejecting any notions which are, first, not acceptable to your masculine ego; your ego rules you, not your mind.
For a man to accept my words as reality, he must also acknowledge in his mind there exists less-than-adequate cognitive functioning. This will not happen being a threat to a man's ego.
Dr. Kiralynne Schilitubi Professor of English
Posts: 7504 | Registered: Dec 2003
| IP: Logged |
This advertisement, above, is stereotypical masculine thinking; male superiority.
You will note she is young, blond, breasts hanging out almost to a point of exposing her nipples, she is in a "doggie" position, a position of insulting submissiveness to male domination. Behind her, a rug suggesting sex on a floor.
Most insulting, her face is partially concealed which is keeping with men not caring who the woman is nor caring to know the woman. A man has only one interest; fast sex his way.
That adverstisement is purely sexual and does victimize women. That is classic male thinking.
Most insulting, photographs of this type, which are displayed here at Allstocks, are perfectly acceptable to all, and all are men. There is no concern expressed about how those commercial advertisements degrade the female gender.
Contrasting this, my photographs, which are more often not sexual in nature, are rejected. Those photographs of mine which are sexual are presented in an enjoyable and entertaining manner, if not humorous. Those are soundly rejected.
My photographs garner complaints from men.
Advertisment photographs which depict all women as cheap sluts, are well accepted.
That photograph will no longer exist in twenty-four hours from now.
Dr. Kiralynne Schilitubi Professor of English
Posts: 7504 | Registered: Dec 2003
| IP: Logged |
posted
Well we are the aggressive ones.. biologically dictated. I doubt a war between women and men will solve anything. Last time it was attempted women burned bras and guys got to see more boobies..
-------------------- Spend word for word with me and I shall make your wit bankrupt Posts: 977 | Registered: Jun 2006
| IP: Logged |
You gave me nothing to accept in the first place. You speak from a gender bias that can only be responded to by a gender bias.
quote: you are a man and are incapable of molding my words into a model which is both acceptable to your masculine mind and is acceptable to your masculine ego.
Men, in the past, have said much the same thing by saying your hormones don't allow you to think straight all the time there-by making you inferior to men.
You speak in a circular fashion that defeats all responses but at the same time defeats itself.
Besides, I'll lay three to one odds that more women were involved in that photo than men. Men have been subjecting women for centuries. Women have been cowing men by personifying the image of a subjet female for just as long.
-------------------- No longer eligible for government service due to lack of tax issues. Posts: 5178 | From: Up North | Registered: Dec 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
Of course. For you give me no other alternative.
-------------------- No longer eligible for government service due to lack of tax issues. Posts: 5178 | From: Up North | Registered: Dec 2005
| IP: Logged |
quote: Women, contrasting, are independent thinkers and in little need of peer group approval.
This is BS by the way.
Some women are in little need of peer group approval. I'll buy that of you. I'd even buy that for a majority of the women who choose to take their own financial future in their own hands and come to these boards.
But generally speaking the female is just as likely to fall into the trap of "peer approval."
Eating disorders, make-up, painful shoes, kitche purses. This isn't half so much to catch a man as it is to compete and find acceptance with a chosen peer group.
Once you understand men want sex...finding a man is easy. (I said nothing about a "good" man. Just man) Finding girlfriends however can be much more difficult.
-------------------- No longer eligible for government service due to lack of tax issues. Posts: 5178 | From: Up North | Registered: Dec 2005
| IP: Logged |
Your criteria for peer approval by women are not related to cognitive processes.
Perceived physical appearance by a woman is an emotional issue, solely.
Yours is a classic example of molding reality into a model which is compatible with typical masculine thinking; you are imposing masculine standards upon women, just as men mold their masculine models of stock markets into what is acceptable to the masculine brain.
One-hundred percent of participants here and at other stock discussion boards are men. Here, there are two actual women and the rest are faux femmes. All participants at stock discussion boards are male; female participants number so little as to not be a viable factor for percentages.
Ninety-eight percent of stocks discussed prove to be poor choices; losers. Men almost always make poor choices in stocks, again, because men force a stock to be what they expect, only to be disappointed.
My success rate at picking viable stocks for profit is eighty-five percent. I am obviously female. My stocks plays are so because of realistic and in-depth research viewed with logical analysis.
Stock discussion boards almost always present poor choices in stocks because those choices are almost always made by men.
Dr. Kiralynne Schilitubi Professor of English
Posts: 7504 | Registered: Dec 2003
| IP: Logged |
posted
What you are not taking into consideration is the fact that most of these horrible protrusion having men are in fact barely adolescents... This explains much of what you are blaming only on being a man.. The older gentlemen on this board pick good stocks, do not fall for high hype worthless scams... and actually like your pictures. You are in the begining stages of waging a war on men, when it is the boys who are causing your angst.
-------------------- Spend word for word with me and I shall make your wit bankrupt Posts: 977 | Registered: Jun 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
I am impressed by your sucess rate and hope to one day equal it. My current success rate is much higher than a year ago which tells me I am learning.
I agree that more females on this board would broaden the depth of the board and create a much more interesting atmosphere. If you know where they are hiding away from the big bad men feel free to let them know there is one here who would like to have em around.
You counter your own arguement about bad stock picks. If 100% of the posters here are men, of course the poorly picked stocks are going to be picked by men. Who else would do it? Until there is an equal number of women picking stocks there is no way to make a comparative analysis. The record of one woman cannot be compared to the record of 100 men and create a balanced result.
Emotional issues are not cognitive and thereby do not fit the criteria of your arguement? Very well. I counter that my sexual drive is not cognitive either. I have centuries of men making fools of themselves to back up my assertion. My sexual drive is fueled by the testosterone in my body. That is also the fuel for the aggressive side of my personality. Using your own equation that means my aggressive, sexual, exploitive behavior is as equally unaddmissable when speaking of cognitive behavior as your feminine hormones and "peer pressure" foibles.
Equality means just that. Women are equal to men. In ALL categories.
You personally , however, seem to be remarkably adept at making money at stocks and I again say if you see me making mistakes please feel free to PM me and "attempt" to teach this male mind of mine something.
-------------------- No longer eligible for government service due to lack of tax issues. Posts: 5178 | From: Up North | Registered: Dec 2005
| IP: Logged |
R.D. Following the crowd too eh? Those trend setters are so *cool*!!! LOL
-------------------- No longer eligible for government service due to lack of tax issues. Posts: 5178 | From: Up North | Registered: Dec 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
Yes, there are a small number of gentlemen present at all stock discussion boards. This is a given realized by reasonably intelligent people, regardless of gender. This is not a notion which needs to be stated; we know this.
Allstocks presents a higher than normal percentage of intelligent gentlemen. This cannot be debated.
However, those gentlemen are men. They display the same deep rooted masculine thinking which victimizes women.
Last night, a man is harassing me. I make a point to write professional level articles free of bias; purely intelligent meaningful research articles.
I am instructed by a man I am not allowed to write those articles because the topics have previously been discussed. An overt attempt is made to dictate what I may discuss or not discuss.
Earlier, I am threatened with a legal lawsuit if I continue to discuss a select and pertinent topic, a threat by a man who had previously inflicted the most vile of insults against me, allegations of being a child molester. No action is taken.
Periodically, I register objections to very clear harassment by a man. The only other woman who participates here, also registered her objections. The man was allowed to continue his harassment; no action taken to stop his blatant harassment.
One or more men register complaints about my pictures. Action is taken immediately.
Those complaints by a man or men are unfounded, quite clearly. Those complaints are not about pictures, those complaints are a methodology to inflict hatred upon a disliked woman. This is no different than complaints filed against me with the SEC based on false allegations of engaging in paid bashing. Those complaints, as with complaints about photographs, statements and other notions, are all falsified complaints; expressions of hatred, not truth.
Message sent is very basic; reward the men, punish the women.
Men view this harassment of women, in the quiet of their minds, "This is not harassment. He is putting her in her place where she belongs." This notion is rarely spoken and certainly not written, but is readily apparent, even amongst the gentlemen here.
Two women register objections to clear sexist based, hatred based harassment; no action.
A man objects to photographs; immediate action.
No complaints, however, about these "sexist pig" advertisements which degrade and insult every woman across our world. Not only degrade women but enable and promote more degrading of women.
Men enable themselves to commit acts of sexism, if not outright hatred and racism.
A man is allowed to harass a woman over her objections and he learns if he submits falsified complaints, he can effect hatred based injury upon a woman; he is enabled, he is assisted.
Stock discussion boards are a "Good 'Ol Boys" club where women are shunned but not disallowed.
These acts of hate crimes effected against me, should have never happened. Those racial slurs would have never come about if the problem was nipped in the bud. However, those two racists are men and inherently they are favored because this board, like virtually all stock discussion boards, is controlled by men who are incapable of realizing both subtle and deep sexist acts, much less ongoing acts of hatred, some unlawful.
It is of no surprise the most hated and the most abused person at this board, is female.
Quite ironic she is probably the most valuable participant this board enjoys.
Dr. Kiralynne Schilitubi Professor of English
Posts: 7504 | Registered: Dec 2003
| IP: Logged |
Now that I know you are referring to certain men from a certain thread that certainly had overexposure last night I have no objections to your post whatsoever.
Now that I know the aim of your thrust you have my complete agreement.
Let it be noted I would be sorely depressed to see you gone. I find you thoroughly entertaining and informative.
Just please don't lump me in with the afore mentioned.
-------------------- No longer eligible for government service due to lack of tax issues. Posts: 5178 | From: Up North | Registered: Dec 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
I am sitting here reading articles, conducting my research to verify my notions about rampant sexism are, in fact, correct. Women make sure they are right, before being assertive.
Yesterday, I write articles about topics which were immeadiately dismissed as nonsense, wrapped in personal insults and harassment.
Today, I read the same men who engaged in harassment and insults, bringing up those topics of mine, acting as though those topics have never been mentioned and are their own novel discoveries.
Yesterday, I am ordered to not discuss those topics, by a man. Today, those topics are being discussed by men as if I do not exist.
There is evidence of how a woman introduces intelligent and high pertinent topics into a discussion, is ridiculed, insulted, told to "shut up and go away." Now those topics are claimed by men, the same who previously dismissed those topics, with insult and hatred.
No action taken.
I am assuming readers do not like my true personality being displayed. I really do not care. Men around here begged for my true self to become self-evident.
Men do not appreciate a good thing when she kisses them on their cheeks and slips money into their pockets.
Dr. Kiralynne Schilitubi Professor of English
Posts: 7504 | Registered: Dec 2003
| IP: Logged |
posted
Purl, I've been banned a number of times.. mainly when QBID was hot. I showed proof positive that it was a share selling scam.. I was attacked repeatedly, and the first time I responded I was banned.. This kind of thing has nothing to do with gender.. it's about the numbers.. How do message boards make their money? Numbers. Advertising based on those numbers. Who attracts more numbers? You and I? Or high hype pump and dump stocks? Purl I have no doubt you will prevail... Just as I knew I would.
-------------------- Spend word for word with me and I shall make your wit bankrupt Posts: 977 | Registered: Jun 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
And thanks to you Relentless, and Dustoff, Father of Two, Wallace, Ric, and others I sold my QBID shares while I could still get a decent amount of money out of them. I'm just glad the QBID thread didn't turn into another CMKX thread, with hardcore investers defending it to the bitter end. At least it hasn't yet!
Posts: 1235 | From: Anacortes, WA | Registered: Apr 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
Purl.....very informative. Great post. Enjoyed. I actually went and got my wife and had her read your post ..... which inturn had us discussing gender and trading. Thanks.
Posts: 1178 | From: Mobile, AL | Registered: Aug 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
Dustoff, I consider you to be a true gentleman, and a true soldier. I like you.
You are the only gentleman here at Allstocks who is brave enough to stand up in defense of what you believe to be the good. You have not lost this bravery you displayed some three decades back. My husband would salute you and offer you cold beer and a comfortable place to rest your feet while swapping stories of Saigon bars and Saigon whores.
Consider my words. You will profit much better to negotiate a position in a stock rather than force a position and hope for the best.
UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!
Printer-friendly view of this topic
![[Razz]](tongue.gif)
My sexual drive is fueled by the testosterone in my body. That is also the fuel for the aggressive side of my personality. Using your own equation that means my aggressive, sexual, exploitive behavior is as equally unaddmissable when speaking of cognitive behavior as your feminine hormones and "peer pressure" foibles. ![[Big Grin]](biggrin.gif)
![[Smile]](smile.gif)
