quote:Originally posted by DWE: Well, a man thinking of a woman sexually is, what do you call it?..... Oh, NATURAL. But when a Tony Bennett (YOU) starts thinking about a DWE (ME) sexually, then it's a liberal perversion.
Oh hey, thanks for deleting Michael Savage's name under, "Why don't you go get AIDS and die"!
Again, a typical left wing ultra liberal doing anything possible to make me, a registered Republican who is proud of our President and what he stands for look bad. You just made a even better person just now! Because we, The REAL and TRUE AMERICANS never back down from LIBERAL COMMIES like YOU! You just keep screwing yourself over again and again and again.
Now go call Yoko Ono on the telephone and tell her that you love her.
OMG!!! I figured it out!!!
IT'S THE REAL LIFE 40 YEAR OLD VIRGIN!
(sorry for the caps)
-------------------- Remember two things: You love New York City and leave only your footprints. Posts: 1526 | From: Chatham, NJ... and NC-- Wake Forest University | Registered: Jul 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
From a woman's perspective, I'd much rather have Condalisa Rice for President, than Hilary! There is too much criminal activity in Hilary's past, for me to want her to be in charge of our country!
-------------------- As for me and my house, we will serve the Lord! Posts: 622 | From: USA | Registered: Aug 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
by dwe. Zell Miller is the ONLY Democrat I know that is a "Conservative" that tells the whole damn truth about the fall of the Democratic Party. He's really saying that Democrats don't exist anymore, they're gone! They've all turned into these ultra ultra left-winged nut brains that are attempting to go back in time, back to the "summer of 68", .................................
The dems all voted for the war, for all bushes spending packages for the patriot act.. democrats like republicans dont read the legislation they vote on ,,, as long as the special intrest groups they work for got there legislation sliped into the bill . thats all they care about,,,, I think the dems are becoming like the republicans,, crooks
Posts: 203 | From: Renton, WA | Registered: Jan 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
I hope Dr. Condoleezza does not become president of the USA. She and many other politicans are crooks or just plain stupid. A politician that supported the war to invade Iraq because they believed there was WMD's in Iraq should be lose their job and be prosecuted for negligent homicide. Before you accuse someone and then murder thousands of people based on flawed intelligence and then say it was the right thing to do, the Bush clan and people that believe this lie, lay in the bed as Satan, Hilter, and the people that murdered/or enslaved millions of people in Africa. I am not a Democrat or a Republician. There has to be an independent politician out there that is honest, trustworthy, and has some common sense.
For example, how can the US give the State of Israel and many other countries the income that Americans make. There are people in this country that are poor and need desperate help in starting businesses and obtaining training. The US seems to help people coming into country, but not its own citizens(the people who pay taxes). Foreigners whether in this country or not do not pay taxes, yet we support them. This is wrong!
How do you think the State of Israel gets a weapon system as soon as we develop it? We (the politicans) give this country billions of dollars in war equipment and infrastructure support while our people are homeless, people losing their jobs, our roads are falling apart, and education and training programs are lacking. An independent president should would go to communities needing assistance and help those people get on their feet.
We need an independent president that is not tied to big business, warped ideology, and other countries. The President should be for the United States of America and not for the State of Israel. I don't understand why the State of Israel is so precious.
Nothing against Dr. Condoleezza but she is not for the "U.S." of "A." and certainly not independent.
Posts: 87 | Registered: Dec 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
"Why We Know Iraq is Lying" By Dr. Condoleezza Rice
The following column written by National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice, was released by the White House on Jan. 24, 2003:
WASHINGTON. Eleven weeks after the United Nations Security Council unanimously passed a resolution demanding yet again that Iraq disclose and disarm all its nuclear, chemical and biological weapons programs, it is appropriate to ask, "Has Saddam Hussein finally decided to voluntarily disarm?" Unfortunately, the answer is a clear and resounding no. Iraq's behavior could not offer a starker contrast. Instead of a commitment to disarm, Iraq has a high-level political commitment to maintain and conceal its weapons, led by Saddam Hussein and his son Qusay, who controls the Special Security Organization, which runs Iraq's concealment activities. Instead of implementing national initiatives to disarm, Iraq maintains institutions whose sole purpose is to thwart the work of the inspectors. And instead of full cooperation and transparency, Iraq has filed a false declaration to the United Nations that amounts to a 12,200-page lie.
For example, the declaration fails to account for or explain Iraq's efforts to get uranium from abroad, its manufacture of specific fuel for ballistic missiles it claims not to have, and the gaps previously identified by the United Nations in Iraq's accounting for more than two tons of the raw materials needed to produce thousands of gallons of anthrax and other biological weapons.
otherwise? her bio is pretty impressive: In June 1999, she completed a six year tenure as Stanford University 's Provost, during which she was the institution's chief budget and academic officer. As Provost she was responsible for a $1.5 billion annual budget and the academic program involving 1,400 faculty members and 14,000 students. She was a member of the boards of directors for the Chevron Corporation, the Charles Schwab Corporation, the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation, the University of Notre Dame, the International Advisory Council of J.P. Morgan and the San Francisco Symphony Board of Governors. She was a Founding Board member of the Center for a New Generation, an educational support fund for schools in East Palo Alto and East Menlo Park, California and was Vice President of the Boys and Girls Club of the Peninsula . In addition, her past board service has encompassed such organizations as Transamerica Corporation, Hewlett Packard, the Carnegie Corporation, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, The Rand Corporation, the National Council for Soviet and East European Studies, the Mid-Peninsula Urban Coalition and KQED, public broadcasting for San Francisco.
-------------------- Don't envy the happiness of those who live in a fool's paradise. Posts: 36378 | From: USA | Registered: Sep 2003
| IP: Logged |
otherwise? her bio is pretty impressive: In June 1999, she completed a six year tenure as Stanford University 's Provost, during which she was the institution's chief budget and academic officer. As Provost she was responsible for a $1.5 billion annual budget and the academic program involving 1,400 faculty members and 14,000 students. She was a member of the boards of directors for the Chevron Corporation, the Charles Schwab Corporation, the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation, the University of Notre Dame, the International Advisory Council of J.P. Morgan and the San Francisco Symphony Board of Governors. She was a Founding Board member of the Center for a New Generation, an educational support fund for schools in East Palo Alto and East Menlo Park, California and was Vice President of the Boys and Girls Club of the Peninsula . In addition, her past board service has encompassed such organizations as Transamerica Corporation, Hewlett Packard, the Carnegie Corporation, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, The Rand Corporation, the National Council for Soviet and East European Studies, the Mid-Peninsula Urban Coalition and KQED, public broadcasting for San Francisco...
Yes, its Ok to have a smart brain. In fact, I know a lot of people having smarts. But smarts will not help our country if you are inherently evil. And she is inherently evil. How can she stand up for a man, such as GW, when he said he knew where the WMD's were. I have some smarts myself, and I know when those darn politicians spin. I will support her if she brings home the WMD's. Bring them home--I want to see them! Claiming Iraq had WMD's was there only reason for invading and as a result murders and is still murdersing thousands of people. It is an abomination that those criminals were allowed to have a second term in office. What was the people of the USA thinking. Do not get me wrong, Sadam Hussien probably was not a nice man either, but that does not give the USA the right to invade their country. Why didn't they wait for the UN vote to invade Iraq. The UN was in there performing inspections.
--------------- Mark my words! These people are the beginning of the end for millions of people including Americans. hint: World War III equals death and destruction. This does not have to happen. We need a independent leader that looks at the world not based on Israeli VS Arab, but fairness and how you would want to be treated.
Posts: 87 | Registered: Dec 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
"Claiming Iraq had WMD's was there only reason for invading and as a result murders and is still murdersing thousands of people. It is an abomination that those criminals were allowed to have a second term in office. What was the people of the USA thinking. Do not get me wrong, Sadam Hussien probably was not a nice man either, but that does not give the USA the right to invade their country. Why didn't they wait for the UN vote to invade Iraq. The UN was in there performing inspections."
HEAR! HEAR!
Posts: 11304 | From: Fort Worth, Texas | Registered: Mar 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
The American people were snowed big time.They were fed a line that alittle over half the people ate it up like ice cream on a summer day. Did Bush win a single debate? The polls said no but people said they thought he could do a better job at defending us. Another words they bought into the b/s. Posts: 6008 | From: phoenix az | Registered: Mar 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
true bond. any misgivings i had at first? were set aside when Hillary voted to give Bush authorisation to use force...
NO! LOL not because i like Hillary, but because i figgered if she would do that? there must be a good reason...
she got fooled too...
people will begin to vote more moderately again now (if the vote is really not "rigged") simply because (for the most part?) people are moderate... Bush didn't win in '04 because the majority of people are conservative, he won because we were at war.. HIS war
and he won in '00 because of Monica--- but hey? a win is a win.... funny thing about politics? anybody with integrity and who is really smart enpough to do the job, isn't dumb enough tot ake it, and has too much integrity to do "whatever it takes" to win it...
-------------------- Don't envy the happiness of those who live in a fool's paradise. Posts: 36378 | From: USA | Registered: Sep 2003
| IP: Logged |
posted
And since this is about Condi she ran around selling the program like she was selling the holy grail. All in all history will look at this and be amazed how the srongest contry in the world was led down the garden path by a team of morons, with a very simple story but people were looking for a simple answer that made them think it was justice,holy, and right to do and walla, Iraq and an evile that the world has to crush and you have the last crusade and the way a lot of people think if you don't have to go who cares. Its fun to stand on a corner and wave a flag and say to others good by and say I am an American and God bless us and our noble cause. Looks good on monday morning when you go to work you can let this little gem drop at the water cooler and hope it catches the bosses ear. Because isn't that they way it worked for good old Condi. And the rest,Brownie Boy,Rummy, and Scooter. Why by the time this is over there will be stories of Bush leading the charge on his white charger, with his mighty battle scared shield and battle axe. With his battle scared team of toadies crushing the enemy beneath them. I could go on for hours but I better stop.
[ January 24, 2006, 23:38: Message edited by: bond006 ]
Posts: 6008 | From: phoenix az | Registered: Mar 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
Oh When will there glory fade oh the wild charge they made honor the toady birgade what a noble blunder
Posts: 6008 | From: phoenix az | Registered: Mar 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
What blows my mind is how the Bush administration will turn on people who wont go along with the joke. Ambasador Wilson, if he was such a traitor and a liar and a fool, why the hell would they send him to be our last line of defence from nuclear anhialation? Or Richard Clark our terrorism expert we paid to wander aimlessly around the white house. Minutes after 911 Condoleeza Rice asked "wheres that Richard Clark" , after he had begged for meetings on Osama and alqaeda and was ignored. Then he lets the public know how the administration treated him and the terrorism isue, then he is vilified. Except for his statment that 911 couldn't have been stopped. They're sure that he wasn't lying about that.
Also, I am a nice guy , just ask me.
Posts: 203 | From: Renton, WA | Registered: Jan 2006
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by glassman: ... people will begin to vote more moderately again now (if the vote is really not "rigged") simply because (for the most part?) people are moderate... Bush didn't win in '04 because the majority of people are conservative, he won because we were at war.. HIS war
Bush won because the supreme court judges wanted to pay back their gratitude for his daddy electing them to the supreme court.
Posts: 87 | Registered: Dec 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
I think she does I read in some mag. that she thinks of George W. as her husband If it is true they would make a sweet couple if you wanted to scare away satan
Posts: 6008 | From: phoenix az | Registered: Mar 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
I ain't questioning the assertion that Condoleezza Rice is THE woman. I am questioning whether or not Condoleezza Rice is A woman.
She is in the same class as Ann Coulter, whom I know isn't even a human being, let alone a human female being.
It is genetically impossible for any human, male or female, to have so much distain for people. Otherwise, we the people would have perished from this Earth millions of years back and there would never have been a government.
Posts: 11304 | From: Fort Worth, Texas | Registered: Mar 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
I made a thread on that very subject. I will bounce it up now!
quote:Originally posted by bdgee: I ain't questioning the assertion that Condoleezza Rice is THE woman. I am questioning whether or not Condoleezza Rice is A woman.
-------------------- "Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."
- Benjamin Franklin Posts: 3898 | Registered: Dec 2005
| IP: Logged |
UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!
Printer-friendly view of this topic
![[Confused]](confused.gif)
![[Roll Eyes]](rolleyes.gif)
![[Big Grin]](biggrin.gif)
![[Wink]](wink.gif)
