posted October 22, 2004 11:13            

quote:

---

Originally posted by Upside:
Yeah, and there's also baby lions and grizzly bears that everyone seems to love when they're young and then one day when you least expect it, they kill you.

---

Thats funny.

posted October 22, 2004 12:01            

IT WILL GET APPROVED. Bash me all you want but I get my info from my friend who works for BEAR STERNS. He is the one who told me about SIRI AND I BUY 300,000 SHARES AT 0.80 A SHARE. MY FRIEND KNOWS PEOPLE WHO WORK AT THE LAW FIRM WHERE DR. ROGER GLENN WORKS. HE ALSO SAID ROGER GLENN IS A VERY POWERFUL MAN.

posted October 22, 2004 12:23            

quote:

---

Guys I am back.

---

posted October 22, 2004 13:15            

We all talk about the negative impacts of all the developments and the "let downs" that we have had, and how the pps doesnt move and the shareholders are lef tin the dark and are taken an advantage of.....

However, we know that a r/s is not 100% out of the question, we also know that one way to get the pps to move would be to reduce the o/s by having UC retire them.

Can we brainstorm anything that this organization could do that could change this around....? Even if they found dimaonds of significant value, from what I understand from more experinced people is that the o/s is so high, that it wouldnt move....

posted October 22, 2004 13:22            

quote:

---

What else could they do that is "outside the box" that would help move the pps?

---

Shoot Melvin.

posted October 22, 2004 13:27            

Anything constructive?

quote:

---

Originally posted by Upside:
originally posted by JEAL:
Shoot Melvin.

---

posted October 22, 2004 13:29            

quote:

---

Upside -
Anything constructive?

---

Unfortunately, no.

posted October 22, 2004 13:46            

quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What else could they do that is "outside the box" that would help move the pps?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

bill gates could become one of the cmkx faithfull or maybe if we are real lucky oprah

posted October 22, 2004 13:53            

quote:

---

bill gates could become one of the cmkx faithfull or maybe if we are real lucky oprah

---

LOL bill but thats about as constructive as my suggestion!

posted October 22, 2004 14:02            

Tried for some constructive discussions, input and the opportunity for points of view and end up with sarcasm.....[/QUOTE]

posted October 22, 2004 14:03            

quote:

---

Originally posted by JEAL:
Rather disappointing -

Tried for some constructive discussions, input and the opportunity for points of view and end up with sarcasm.....

---

I second that JEAL.

My interpretation of their comments.
Upside: 'Shoot Melvin.' - PERSONAL VENDETTA
bill1352: 'bill gates could become one of the cmkx faithfull or maybe if we are real lucky oprah' - PRIVATE PLACEMENT

posted October 22, 2004 14:07            

quote:

---

Originally posted by ed19363:
....and again, THIS IS AN OPINION!!!!
Originally posted by JEAL:
[/B]

---

posted October 22, 2004 14:14            

quote:

---

Originally posted by bill1352:
JEAL
Member posted October 22, 2004 13:59

---

posted October 22, 2004 14:20            

The one thing that I think you really struck a note on is the fact of steady income. I think this is definelty s astep in order to be 100% reporting with proper intentions.

quote:

---

Originally posted by bill1352:
if this new gold mine can bring in steady income meaning UC doesn't need to sell shares to keep going with the search for diamonds & can fund cmkx's part of the uranium claims search then an r/s down to 40 billion and proof the a/s was reduced to the same number could alone drive the pps up with the following cmkx has. then any good news on the uranium front, probably the first to be found, could really send it flying as there wouldn't be any shares left on the sell side only ppl taking profits

---

posted October 22, 2004 14:29            

Question? If / when CMKX does become reporting, so they have the opportunity again to change their legal entity nanme and/or ticker symbol w/o effect to anything?

quote:

---

Originally posted by bill1352:
truth is JEAL i dont think a 40 billion o/s would work for any company on the market except cmkx because of its following and that is out of the box. i'd love to have 100 million shares of cmkx and then an 40/1 r/s but before all the dividends were paid with the split numbers on the dividends sometime in the next yr .you could be sitting mighty pretty

[This message has been edited by bill1352 (edited October 22, 2004).]

---

posted October 22, 2004 14:50            

I agree with you in the business plan, and maybe with any luck, and this "fully reporting" scenario, maybe Mr. Glenn is helping is this as well - who knows.
Regarding the motorsports adventures, I dont really see this as a problem - corportate sponsorship - is a multi billion dollar campaign for everyone. HOWEVER !! I do agree, that before they issue PR's on such, the true priority should be on things such as business plans and updates on exisiting programs / projects...

quote:

---

Originally posted by Upside:
Hey JEAL, I apologize too if I offfended you or anyone else for that matter, that wasn't the intent, just lightening things up on a rather boring day. Anyway, you want "outside the box" things they can do? Ok. First get rid of Melvin (no, I don't mean shoot him) and replace him with someone who is not an embarrasment. Second, announce a reverse split of both the o/s and a/s and couple it with a p/r detailing their business plan for the next 5 years with year by year projections. Third, eliminate all ties to funny cars, motorcycles, racing trucks, etc.

To most companies this is not "outside the box" thinking, it's called honoring your corporate responsibility to the shareholders. CMKX apparently does not believe it has any responsibility to anyone other than its own group of self-serving insiders nor do they have or follow any code of ethics whatsoever. In short, "outside the box" to CMKX would be to do what most companies do as a normal course of business.

---

posted October 22, 2004 15:20            

quote:

---

Regarding the motorsports adventures, I dont really see this as a problem - corportate sponsorship - is a multi billion dollar campaign for everyone.

---

posted October 22, 2004 15:29            

quote:

---

Originally posted by Upside:
originally posted by JEAL:
With all due respect, I see it as one huge migraine headache of a problem, here's why. Prior to CMKX/CMKM/CMKI Mr. Casavant, while maybe comfortable, was by no means an extremely wealthy individual. I bought into his diamond exploration business before there was even a thought of funny cars. I now see very little of my investment money going towards what I chose to invest in. What I do see is a lot, and I do mean a lot, of OUR money going towards a funny car and other racing ventures. I witnessed this first hand at the Chicago races and believe me, there is serious, serious money being spent by the company to support this racing effort. Urban could not have afforded this on his own so guess what, you, me, and 40 some thousand other investors are paying for it. This racing circuit they're on has to be costing them millions of dollars per season and they've already said they plan on having a bigger presence next season. I've stood next to the car and believe me, they are not getting much if anything in advertising revenue through the selling of ad space on the car. The biggest one on it was for a mortgage company in Las Vegas and that was maybe 6" x 8". Now, imagine if all of those dollars had instead been poured into what all of us invested in. Assuming everything the company says is true and we actually hold all of those land claims, do you know what could have been accomplished in that same time frame? Instead we know of one set of samples from a known empty pipe. Everything else is rumor. Yet here everyone sits and instead of literally striking up a posse and demanding answers, we spin wild, outlandish fantasies to reassure ourselves that everything will be fine. How this company earned this kind of faith from its shareholders is beyond me. What they have in fact earned is what should be the loudest outcry ever heard from a group of investors. Something akin to "Horton Hears a Who" only this one would be "Urban Hears a Lawsuit". Sadly though, it will never happen. The racing side of CMKX will continue to flourish while the diamond/mineral side will take the back seat.

---

posted October 22, 2004 15:55            

quote:

---

Originally posted by JEAL:
UC,RG,RW are truly brave in such an invitation of a large mast of people.

[This message has been edited by JEAL (edited October 22, 2004).]

---

posted October 22, 2004 15:57            

Again - strictly opinion on your behalf.

Upside - this is a prime example of the reference I made regarding frustration on this board.

quote:

---

Originally posted by tigertony:
Upside,its basic economics.The company has no income and they need funding for racing.Company sponsors it Upside pays for it.You should be proud everytime that car makes it down the track,you helped make it possible.Company's sponsor race cars all the time,of course them and there shareholders are profitable,broke and pps at0.00002,you would think pissed off shareholders,But not the mesmorized cmkx followers,its all good.Remember its part of a never seen before in the history of stocks,0.0002 short of the century.Congratulations (company,diamonds income) we don't need no stinkin diamonds.We got the cmkx funnycar yeah baby.LMAO And for those that this upsets just have a laugh or sell you stock this is all true and if it upsets you thats why because you are actually pissed off at this company too.

[This message has been edited by tigertony (edited October 22, 2004).]

---

posted October 22, 2004 16:08            

re:UCAD, when CMKX announced the UCAD divvy, I had enough cash lying around to buy 200 little shares of UCAD (at the time about $4.50 a share), and cashed them in at $10.50 when UCAD made its run. IMO you dont need income for a penny stock to make a run, the penny market doesnt operate like the NYSE. I also agree that UCAD will have income from the incoming gold, and may even wind up being a better buy than CMKX.

posted October 22, 2004 16:12            

NOTE: Understanding that your typo is 0.0002 not 0.00002.

If you would, please refer to my last several posts on this page, and see exactly what my thoughts are before you try to explain how and I other on this board view this stock, as I am quite sure that not "everyone" beleived in this short of the century theory - however, I do beleive it is happeneing, to what degree, I can comment nor can anyone else. Educated guess's and assumptions is all anyone has to go on.

All the best in your investments

Cheers

quote:

---

Originally posted by tigertony:
Jeal show me another company with 0.00002 pps that sponsors race cars and have no income.It is a fact that every one said short of century,wait until dividend.Proven wrong.It is a fact that shareholders would be pissed at other companys that did this.And by non mesmorized shareholders of cmkx that are pissed off about this.I don't see to much of that just being my opinion.You canwant this stock to do good and i hope it does.But the company has done or shown any info, facts, data,for now I am going on facts, not you.Like i told you before i own mlon and am in this type situation,but i make the same comments and jokes on that also on the facts that are out not what i want them to be Good Luck.

[This message has been edited by tigertony (edited October 22, 2004).]

---

posted October 22, 2004 16:20            

quote:

---

Originally posted by ed19363:
I also agree that UCAD will have income from the incoming gold, and may even wind up being a better buy than CMKX.

Ed

---

Very true. Remember UCAD has a 15% claim on all CMKX's mineral rights. This includes the Gold and Uranium. Same applies to SGGM with 5%.

posted October 22, 2004 16:21            

After reading that I can almost share that same view. I do beleive that you may be right. This may have started off as a little support for the little ones at home.
But just to spin your scenario a little -
WHAT IF?
Instead of getting in over his head, they actually did trip over something of market proportions that would substantiate the working of a legitimate business.....?

That may be wishful thinking - or the truth - however, yours does seem to be the easist and more obvious to see...

quote:

---

Originally posted by Upside:
JEAL,
You posed the question do I honestly believe the company is corrupt. My answer is yes and no. I firmly believe it started out that way, nothing more than a vehicle to support Urban and his family, nice quiet little stock scam like any of the other hundreds there are on the pink sheets. Somewhere along the line though greed set in and things went haywire. This went from being an anonymous little scam to one of epic proportions that there was no getting out of without someone going down hard. Enter Roger Glenn. In my opinion he is here to clean this mess up, maybe even turn it into a legitimate company or at least give it that appearance. I know people will say that he would never risk his reputation that way but that is hogwash. Thanks to us, Urban is a wealthy man and is probably making Roger Glenn wealthy as well. If he can pull Urban and his cronies out of this unscathed, guess who his reputation goes up with and who it goes down with? Goes up in the eye of the corporate world, actually skyrockets, and goes down in the eye of the little guys, the you and me of the world. How is that damaging to Mr. Glenn and his firm?

Anyway, to answer your question, yes I believe it was a scam at first but now I feel that through greed and blatant stupidity they have been forced to turn this into somewhat of a legitimate company.

---

posted October 22, 2004 16:25            

quote:

---

Originally posted by JEAL:
TruthTeller -

This is what led me to the other statement - I honestly believe that there will be "something" within the next week or two. Or some announcement made during this time. - as every shareholder needs to have the same opportunity for hearing news at prime time.

---

posted October 22, 2004 16:31            

quote:

---

Originally posted by JEAL:
Tony -

Again - strictly opinion on your behalf.

Upside - this is a prime example of the reference I made regarding frustration on this board.

---

posted October 22, 2004 16:35            

quote:

---

Upside - this is a prime example of the reference I made regarding frustration on this board.

quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by tigertony:
Upside,its basic economics.The company has no income and they need funding for racing.Company sponsors it Upside pays for it.You should be proud everytime that car makes it down the track,you helped make it possible.Company's sponsor race cars all the time,of course them and there shareholders are profitable,broke and pps at0.00002,you would think pissed off shareholders,But not the mesmorized cmkx followers,its all good.Remember its part of a never seen before in the history of stocks,0.0002 short of the century.Congratulations (company,diamonds income) we don't need no stinkin diamonds.We got the cmkx funnycar yeah baby.LMAO And for those that this upsets just have a laugh or sell you stock this is all true and if it upsets you thats why because you are actually pissed off at this company too.

---