posted August 28, 2004 18:14            

DIGDOUGH
Member posted June 13, 2004 18:54
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by dardadog: http://quotes.barchart.com/texpert.asp?sym=GWDL http://quotes.barchart.com/texsnap.asp?sym=GWDL
daclyyay[pb50!b20][vc60][iUb14!La12,26,9]&pref=G]http://stockcharts.com/def/servlet/SC.web?c=gwdl,uu[m,a]daclyyay[pb50! b20][vc60][iUb14!La12,26,9]&pref=G

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

thus has got to be better than qbid

______________________________________________

posted August 28, 2004 18:41            

quote:

---

Originally posted by DIGDOUGH:
Did anybody ever see the post that said qtn has a 10 year contract wit time warner. It does not seem to be the case. when theres no word that time warner is involved at this time. they still have to think about it.This leads me to think that there are B@## SH###@@ on this board that will say anything to get the pps to go up.
Just an observation. An obvious one.

---

By John M. Higgins -- Broadcasting & Cable, 7/12/2004

It took six long years, but gay network Q Television is finally up. Technically speaking. Too bad no one is watching. The Palm Springs, Calif.-based network sends programming to a satellite, where it's available to cable or DBS operators that want to carry it. So far, all have passed.

Q Television, which is composed largely of an eight-hour wheel of old movies and TV reruns, has had a deal with Time Warner Cable for eight months. The catch: It's only a "hunting license." The network has to persuade each local system to take the channel.

posted August 28, 2004 19:56            

[This message has been edited by firefly (edited August 28, 2004).]

posted August 29, 2004 00:19            

I will be buying more Monday afternoon!

"All we ever had to do is launch!"

posted August 29, 2004 00:36            

I will be buying more Monday afternoon!

"All we ever had to do is launch!"

You whiznock are the MAN; your post does make a lot of CENTS $$$$ as well as many Dollars for us QBID Long shareholders and soon, thanks for this post:

By: whizknock
28 Aug 2004, 11:21 PM EDT
Msg. 21393 of 21397
(This msg. is a reply to 21391 by positiveatitude.)
Jump to msg. #
**GOOD NEWS POSITIVEATTITUDE!**

Your attitude will get even better!

As I said two posts prior,,,

We have 15 billion shares authorised & if all of them were in the float & we only realised .01% of our target audience disposable income which weights in at a hefty HALF TRILLION DOLLARS we would be trading over $1 a share!

Basically,,,

"All we ever had to do is launch!"

posted August 29, 2004 01:33            

Rocky Mountain News, Aug. 28th, Business section, story titled, " Local sports network set to air without Comcast deal" 13th story from the top, when pulled up on the web.

Insightful info and parrallels to QBID, even a Sept. 4th launch date.

What I really liked, was this;
"Still, these types of carriage deals often come through at the last minute."

DZ

posted August 29, 2004 07:54            

" On September 26, 2003 TFN began a thirteen week soft launch during which the network broadcast on weekends only. "

" While we still have several hurdles to cross before this deal becomes final, we feel that we can pick up where our soft launch left off last December "

[b] 13 weeks guys! Thats a little over 3 months! QBID started the soft Launch June 1st. Networks take time to build.

posted August 29, 2004 08:01            

TFN hasn't even aired yet. They just conducted the soft launch.
Before August 3rd ,2004 they had no news for over 2 months, I repeat THEY HAD NO NEWS FOR OVER 2 MONTHS!

posted August 29, 2004 09:42            

One thing that I want to see is subscribers come out of the 'closet.' (LOL) I hope the callers for QTN are not investors only, but interested people...Now, if QTN is offered in my area, I'M definitely subscribing...no doubt about that! LOL!

In the NY Times this morning there was a big article about gays and meth (Drug) use...how it is harming the gay community in major cities across America...evidently this is a huge problem and centers are trying to deal with it....another QTN reality perspective....just think it is relevant and interesting to the g/l/ community. And Frank has said repeatedly that this network is for g/l and will cover pertinent topics...Just a thought.

I think Frank and his QTN could bring a lot more awareness of gay related issues to the masses through his network...a lot of good could come of it.

posted August 29, 2004 11:38            

how about the pride channel in Canada it went to $6 a share once it went live.

I know you are going to fall back on the O/S count. But you have to fall back to the comparison of subscribers. They did thsi on 25,000 subscribers. i think they have somewhere around 125,000 subs now. that is small compared to the US. there is only 24 million people in Canada, there is 10 times as many people in the US maybe more.
so everything being averaged accordingly i can see no problem getting a $1 a share in time.

so bring on a fair comparision and let us tear apart your dd for a change.

quote:

---

Originally posted by LT1CJ7:
TFNK RECORD VOLUME FOR THE LAST 12 MONTHS WAS AROUND 210,000. NO COMPARISON

---

posted August 29, 2004 12:59            

More Actresses Willing to Play Gay These Days

quote:

---

As female heterosexual characters in television and film continue to be confined to more limited roles than their male counterparts, three-dimensional lesbian characters will only become more and more attractive to actresses, now that the stigma has lifted. The upcoming launch of all-gay channels like here!TV, MTV's Logo, and Q Television will create even more opportunities for this, as these channels create a crop of new series and films with lesbian characters.

---

posted August 29, 2004 13:15            

Cable is here! inks PPV pic pact with In Demand

Channel hopes to draw viewers regularly as a pay net

By JOHN DEMPSEY

NEW YORK -- here! TV, the cable programming service aimed at gays and lesbians, has signed a deal with In Demand to provide 30 hours a month of pay-per-view movies for video-on-demand, beginning Aug. 1.

DirecTV and EchoStar already offer dedicated channels to Here! TV for its PPV service, which includes original movies the network touts as world premieres or U.S. premieres, at a retail cost of $3.99.

Paul Colichman, president and CEO of Here! TV, said his goal is to turn Here! from a programming service into a full-fledged digital pay TV network. Oct. 1 is the launch date, but no cable operators or satellite distributors have yet signed up for the 24/7 network.

The hope of Here! TV is that the buy rates of the 30 hours of PPV movie programming will be impressive enough to convince cable ops that the service could draw viewers regularly as a pay net. One movie, "Weapons of Mass Destruction," stars Cynthia Rothrock, the martial-arts specialist billed as "the first lesbian action hero."

Unlike Viacom's proposed gay/lesbian network Logo, Here! TV will be a pay channel and will not accept advertising. Colichman said that strategy will allow Here! TV to schedule edgy, R-rated-type programming uncut, the way HBO and Showtime do.

For the VOD offering, Rebecca Glashow, director of content planning and management for In Demand, said the Here! TV movies would not get a dedicated channel but would be part of a category of titles set apart as movies that appeal to gays and lesbians.

Glashow said the cable operators that own In Demand -- Comcast, Cox, Time Warner and Advance/Newhouse -- will give careful scrutiny to the buy rates of the Here! TV movies in order to gauge its potential as a network.

Colichman said most entrepreneurs behind new channels are offering a "traditional diet" of the same kind of programming subscribers already get from other networks. Here! TV is offering different programming.

posted August 29, 2004 13:32            

quote:

---

Originally posted by LT1CJ7:
NO DD IS BETTER THAN POOP, THE ONLY PURPOSE FOR THIS COMPARISON IS TO PUMP THE POSSIBILITIES BEYOND WHAT THEY ARE..JUST LET IT PLAY OUT...COMPARING ORANGES AND APPLES IS NOT DD.

---

posted August 29, 2004 13:44            

quote:

---

Originally posted by LT1CJ7:

POSTED ABOVE
In case you didn't read the whole thing. TFNT is at 45 cents. QBID should be there very soon.

---

posted August 29, 2004 13:52            

"Thins Football network is a startup also and look where it is! .45. with a High of 80 cents"
___________________________________
You forgot to mention that it was trading in the $1.50 - $2.00 range for its highs in the previous year. In fact, if you invested in TFN at its high one year ago, you would actually be staring at a 60% loss on your investment.

Did you also mention that this stock never traded below $0.15? I can't remember if you mentioned that at all.

Oh, I'm not sure if you mentioned the float for TFN or not,
"Common stock, no par value: 20,000,000 shares authorized; 6,828,160 ...shares issued and outstanding at April 30, 2004" from the 10KSB http://www.pinksheets.com/quote/print_filings.jsp?url=%2Fredirect.asp%3Ffilename%3D0001011823%252D04%252D000025%252Etxt%26filepath%3D%255C2004%255C07%255C29%255C&symbol=TFN

Now, quick math calculation.... assume 9.5 billion shares... oh, look, share price would be valued at $0.0005, not at $0.65. Not sure if you noticed that or not.
You might have skipped over that part, seeing as it takes away form the imnpact of your pump.

posted August 29, 2004 14:34            

quote:

---

Originally posted by denzen:
Check this out!

Rocky Mountain News, Aug. 28th, Business section, story titled, " Local sports network set to air without Comcast deal" 13th story from the top, when pulled up on the web.

What I really liked, was this;
"Still, these types of carriage deals often come through at the last minute."

DZ

[This message has been edited by denzen (edited August 29, 2004).]

---

posted August 29, 2004 16:19            

quote:

---

Originally posted by LT1CJ7:
TFNT is at 45 cents. QBID should be there very soon.

---

posted August 29, 2004 16:28            

quote:

---

Originally posted by Just Looking:
LT1CJ7, thank the gay and lesbian community!

---

posted August 29, 2004 16:40            

looks like Q can divide target segment for Indian GLBT & black GLBT.
I had no idea that this kind of +++ segregation+++ exists within this population.

Author of below linked article wow that black GLBT must fight for THEIR rights.

Q has extreme potential for extremely interesting programming!!! Pure life issues!!!
http://www.planetout.com/news/feature.html?sernum=940

posted August 29, 2004 18:38            

quote:

---

Originally posted by LT1CJ7:
LIKE IVE SAID AND ILL SAY IT AGAIN THERE IS NO TELEVISION NETWORK WITH AN ESTIMATED A/S OF 9 TO 15 BILLION+/- SHARES.

---

ARE YOU PAYING ATTENTION to the FACTS LT1CJ7. Do NOT Misslead NEW investors into believing that QBID may have between 9 - 15 BILLION Outstanding Shares. The truth is that they have 9 - 9.5 Billion Shares of which Frank (CEO) owns more then half. SO STOP YOUR UNFOUNDED BASHING and please only POST THE FACTS.

Your OS debate is getting OLD. Please come up with something NEW. WE have already been over over this SUBJECT too many times!! I AM GETTING tired of this. You are not even showing the truth such as MICROSOFT with 20 BILLION OS. SIR with 1.2 BILLION and both ARE or Were trading between $4.00 - $20 Per share. OH BUT YOU WOULDNT WANT TO LET THE NEW INVESTORS IN ON THOSE NUMBERS WOULD YA ??

posted August 29, 2004 18:47            

With HYPE this COULD GO TO .15 PER SHARE or MORE.

in the pinks -ANYTHING GOES- !!!!

posted August 29, 2004 18:50            

NOW WE DO !!! We are all waiting to see if the CARRIER RCN actually COMES THROUGH FOR US.

posted August 29, 2004 19:08            

Those that make things happen
Those that watch things happen
and Those that say what happened.

posted August 29, 2004 19:11            

MY STATEMENT SAYS ESTIMATED AND I COULD CARE LESS ABOUT NEW INVESTORS..THE ONLY WAY YOU LEARN IS TO MAKE MISTAKES.

POSTED BY EARTHSHAKER

The truth is that they have 9 - 9.5 Billion Shares of which Frank (CEO) owns more then half. SO STOP YOUR UNFOUNDED BASHING and please only POST THE FACTS.

posted August 29, 2004 19:17            

POSTED BY 1 BIG

JUST SOME FACTS: TAKEN FROM CONVERSATIONS WITH FRANK--PARAPHRASING OF PRESS RELEASES--AND OTHER POSTED OPINIONS ON QBID BOARDS.

posted August 29, 2004 19:23            

Be careful and don't waste your time. Just keep reminding newbies that any post from these 2 should be egnored.
They contribute nothing to this board but hatred remarks against QBID and a defensive response to positive posts.

There's only one reason why ANY HUMAN would waste their time doing so. Would you go into a thread and start finding flaws about a company? NOPE... you move on and dont invest... ONE REASON PEOPLE.

posted August 29, 2004 19:26            

quote:

---

Originally posted by LT1CJ7:
ARE THOSE NUMBERS FACT? CAN YOU SHOW ME THOSE NUMBERS IN A PR OR FILING?????

---

You must have an unsuccessful life! DO IT YOURSELF!!! GO DO SOME RESEARCH AND THEN CONFESS. BE A MAN (or a woman)

posted August 29, 2004 19:32            

Yes we have TIME WARNER contract!!

Yes we have NTI contract!! (they upload SCI-FI, etc..)

Yes we have a contract with RCN cable!!

Yes we have Steven Grunberg (New World, Orion Pictures, Trans World, Epic, and Columbia Tri-Star International)

Next we have Major advertisers (hint in PR.....)

Next we have exposure from national/world media.

Next we have subscriber revenue stream!!!

posted August 29, 2004 19:40            

I know that this in not U4 as U4 is alot smarter then this. U4 has an intelect that I admire. This LT is not smart enough to keep his stories conistent, he waivers from post to post. he is just trying to stir up sh*t as he has had a unhappy childhood or something. he finds real pleasure in seeing complete and utter kaos and bickering.

you are correct though that he is only here to try and lower the pps by causeing doubt by twisting the numbers to look worse then they are. He also exhibits the attribute of being very lazy. He is unable to do DD so he raises questions for everyone else to do the dd for him.

HE is however a waite of time to read his posts as all he wants to do is argue. He does however seem to have some sort of infatuatioin with you 1BigTip. which i would take as a form of flatery.

any how World Cup of Hockey starts tommorrow so we get a bit of fill intil the NHL gets thier differences resulved. lets hope this isnt our only hockey events for the year!!!!!!

Rock on Q

quote:

---

Originally posted by 1BigTip:
People. There is no dought in my mind that LT1CJ7 & U4TSAF2 is the same person.

Be careful and don't waste your time. Just keep reminding newbies that any post from these 2 should be egnored.
They contribute nothing to this board but hatred remarks against QBID and a defensive response to positive posts.

There's only one reason why ANY HUMAN would waste their time doing so. Would you go into a thread and start finding flaws about a company? NOPE... you move on and dont invest... ONE REASON PEOPLE.

Be smart.

---

posted August 29, 2004 19:52            

quote:

---

Originally posted by 1BigTip:
*****REASONS TO INVEST IN QBID*****

Yes we have TIME WARNER contract!!

Yes we have NTI contract!! (they upload SCI-FI, etc..)

Yes we have a contract with RCN cable!!

Yes we have Steven Grunberg (New World, Orion Pictures, Trans World, Epic, and Columbia Tri-Star International)

Next we have Major advertisers (hint in PR.....)

Next we have exposure from national/world media.

Next we have subscriber revenue stream!!!

Next we have share buyback!!

---