posted February 09, 2004 09:44            

quote:

---

Originally posted by stockguyDD:
where is every1?

---

I AM HERE--MAJOR MOVE TODAY..LOOKING GOOD SO FAR...

posted February 10, 2004 19:59            

At these prices, it should not take too long to accumulate the 500 Mil they were looking to get.

IMO, when the PR hits, we should be hitting penny land ++.

2004 estimated revs = 20+ Mill (from last PR)
# of O/S after buyback = 200+ Mill (from last PR)

This equals 0.10 rps ==== good target point before year end!

Get in now while the pps is at bargain basement prices!!!!!!!

posted February 10, 2004 21:49            

quote:

---

Originally posted by ascw60:
My partner and I went in for 4.7 million shares today. Average cost of .0047066. All non productive thoughts aside, I would like an idea of a timeframe where this might reach .09.

---

posted February 12, 2004 16:55            

The biggest mistake with stockholders is impatience and getting out too early...

I can tell you this from experience. I got out on MKTY a little too early and ended up losing an extra $5,000 profit...

posted February 12, 2004 19:21            

This company claims to have made money
but will not answer any questions as to
how much or even what they are truly
marketing. I have contacted the investor
relations s t o c k e n t e r @ aol.com
who stated and I quote...

"As for the questions re: revenues, all the company has made available is what was published in the press release of 1-30-2004. This is a non-reporting SEC issuer; that means that Cetek is not obligated to report, or file, financial information. And, there is no voluntary reporting of any reports beyond what was reported in that press release; and this is the position the company is taking.

Similarly, the size of the orders, and dollar amount, and to whom the company ships to is not being reported. They consider this proprietary; and esp. regarding their customers, they do not want to give specific names in that this may give Cetek competitors an edge.

Sir, I work with many public companies, and they all have investment risk. Non-reporting pink sheet companies are especially hard to evaluate; and I can appreciate your desire to learn more about this one, so as to help determine the merits of the company. I regret that I cannot be more helpful with your questions, but I am being as honest as I can be. I wish you good luck with all your investments, and ask that you invest prudently and be diverse in what you invest in.

Sincerely,

Stock Enterprises
I/R for CTKH"

I followed with a message requesting the
data to support the 185% profit claim.
(if the company can not or will not produce
any information to back the 185% profit then
I expressed that I consider their release
false and misleading in my humble opinion.
Nothing about a profit should be considered
proprietary... seems a bit fishy to me
you all make your own judgements. I hope
they come back with a positive response.
stockenter responded to my first email within 1 hour on a Saturday. My follow-up e-mails have not been responded to at all - days later...*)

quote:

---

Originally posted by Fallstaff:
Why would you bail on this stock...I've racked up thousands of free shares in this stock, if you can get a feel for the ebb and flo. It's a great company with great potential and probably one of the few that have proven to make money. Eventually, it will have to release but it takes more than a few days/weeks to break out of sub-penny land. PATIENCE!!!!

FS ~ Trust your dd

---

posted February 17, 2004 12:45            

quote:

---

Originally posted by njs300zx:
Anybody have any thoughts on this stock anymore?

---

It's a good stock...just watching it consolidate between .0044 and .0047

FS

posted February 17, 2004 13:04            

The technology you are referring to has nothing to do with CTKH. What you saw was a DLP chip. It would be great if it was.

posted February 22, 2004 00:19            

It states that Cetek and Motorola have an agreement...does that site have credibility?

That would be HUGE!!!

posted February 22, 2004 08:18            

quote:

---

Originally posted by BADGUARD:
I'm new to this board. just thought i would share this link i came across. http://www.nanoelectronicsplanet.com/nanochannels/products/print/0%2C%2C10460_1 481341%2C00.html it had an article. i don't know how trustworthy it is. thought maybe the more experienced people could check it out. like i said i'm a rookie.

[This message has been edited by BADGUARD (edited February 22, 2004).]

---

posted February 22, 2004 22:28            

quote:

---

Originally posted by GOADY911:
what is with oct. of 2002 ?

---

posted February 23, 2004 14:07            

With stocks, and especially new technology that is being developed or sold, you cannot expect an OVERNIGHT BOOM to $1....especially with CTKH. This is going to take time. All stocks take time to re-adjust and I think with the coming elections, things are going to get even screwier....but not to fear...KERRY IS HERE!...LOL...OR MAYBE NADER IS HERE!...LOL

posted February 24, 2004 18:58            

Hate to disagree with your assessment. But
CTKH has been around for a while and under
different symbols.

It produces PR that says just enough to
get people to invest. They will not answer
questions about the company or who their
customers are... They will not produce any
figures that support their claim to have
the first profitable quarter in years. They
will not even tell anyone a figure associated
with their 185% claim.

They use Stock Center as their investor relations
but do not provide any information to
Stock Center beyond the Press Releases.

I put forward many questions to their
investor relations and have not had a
single question answered beyond the company
saying that they do not answer questions
beyond the press releases.

They have given me a number to contact
that has yet to be answered after many
calls over the last two weeks. They will
not send me an e-mail to answer my questions
they say they want to explain them over the
phone.

I recently purchase many shares of CTKH
so that I could prove a point and ask
legitimate questions of the company as
a stockholder.

bottom-line ... Dream a Dream but if
you expect the stock to hit a dollar
at any time in the future I would suggest
pulling up a ******g chair. In my humble
opinion it is going to be a very long wait.

If you wonder why Wall Street has not taken
notice. I would say it has and thus CTKH
is where it is...

posted February 24, 2004 20:47            

I posted this because the astrix
made it seem as though the post
was derogatory.

posted February 27, 2004 10:56            

YEE HAAAAA

posted February 27, 2004 12:36            

quote:

---

Originally posted by rajarammx:
A 500 signal just went thru couple of minutes ago, if I read Scottrade right.

GLTA

---

I read it from the quickquote of Scottrade...

Glta
Raja

posted February 27, 2004 21:06            

Now about the phone call with Fayiz.

I started the call by telling him that we were all very excited about the direction the company is going. I told him that in my judgment, as we read between the lines of the last PR there was a lot to be excited about. His response was that he was glad that I had read between the lines, because many people had called and told him that they felt there was nothing there.

I asked him if the buyback was the reason that the last report was so general in nature. He said no. He told me that he really did have to submit the report, not just to his attorney but to that SEC legal department too.

He would not confirm anything about the buyback. Because there are those who would use the information for financial gain.

I then informed him that I have been very impressed by his leadership of the company through the dot com crash and the R/S difficulties.

I then asked him if there was any way that we could get more specific financial information. His immediate response was that the company was very well off financially. As he put it, the fact that they were doing the buy back means that they could afford it.

He said that his long range goal for CTKH is to be listed on the NASDAQ, as he put it, for the welfare of all of the shareholders. He agreed that as a pinkie we are at the mercy of the shareholders. He says that it is their intention to offset their hold by getting more attention to their stock. As he put it by getting more attention to their stock that will keep the market manipulators (his words) off balance.

He said that financially they are "extremely well off." He said that they have gone through the bad times and they are better now.

I then asked him if he saw a time in the forseeable future when they could begin giving us some solid financial figures. He sais that they are currently considering the possibility of including eanings, profit, and profit per share figures. Things like that.

I told him that as investors it is important that we get such information so that we know that we have our money invested wisely.

He told me that it is up to his attorney. That he has limited their press releases to on per quarter so that they cannot get in trouble with the SEC for pump and dump.

For those of you who doubt that statement by him you need to check out my Comp. DD Report and you will see an example of a report last year where Hilal published a report that he was immediately required to retract. The SEC has slapped his hands, once and he has been super careful ever since then.

He said that the SEC now requires them to provide proof of everything that the plan to put in their reports. He said that one of the ways to satisfy the SEC that they are not a pump and dump is to limit their press releases.

For example he said that his original draft of the last report included specific dollar amounts in the second paragraph. But his attorney made him take it out because it could be considered a pump and dump move. He said that in his opinion, the result was that paragraph was very weak. And he was not satisfied with it, but could do nothing about it.

We chatted about that for a while. We talked about the "Better than you could imagine" comment. And he reafirmed it. And he said that was one of the things they made him take out of the second paragraph.

I suggested that he give more infomation to Jim Stock. I also suggested a mid quarter report. So that there won't be so much lag time between report that kills the momentum. I told him that when we don't hear from them for 3 months the MMs kill us. And that it is hard to justify staying with a postition when the MMs retrace the stock price 50%.

posted March 09, 2004 01:52            

quote:

---

Originally posted by Trader O:
It's been about 10 days since the last post on this. Has anyone heard anything? Is the buyback complete or what?

---

posted March 09, 2004 20:53            

I must have been absent that day in school when they taught that. Would you be so kind to elaborate?

quote:

---

Originally posted by NukeMeds:
Look at the volume over the past 5 trading days. Somewhere in there you should see a LARGE volume spike with a very unproportionate gap up or down in price..hint hint

---