Allstocks.com's Bulletin Board Post A Reply
my profile login | register | search | faq | forum home

» Allstocks.com's Bulletin Board » General Investing Topics » A Munchkin Man Question » Post A Reply

Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon: Icon 1     Icon 2     Icon 3     Icon 4     Icon 5     Icon 6     Icon 7    
Icon 8     Icon 9     Icon 10     Icon 11     Icon 12     Icon 13     Icon 14    
Message:

HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.

 

Instant Graemlins Instant UBB Code™
Smile   Frown   Embarrassed   Big Grin   Wink   Razz  
Cool   Roll Eyes   Mad   Eek!   Confused   BadOne  
Good Luck   More Crap   Wall Bang   Were Up   Were Down    
Insert URL Hyperlink - UBB Code™   Insert Email Address - UBB Code™
Bold - UBB Code™   Italics - UBB Code™
Quote - UBB Code™   Code Tag - UBB Code™
List Start - UBB Code™   List Item - UBB Code™
List End - UBB Code™   Image - UBB Code™

What is UBB Code™?
Options


Disable Graemlins in this post.


 


T O P I C     R E V I E W
Munchkin Man  - posted
Greetings To All:

Pretend for a moment.........

Just for a moment............

That the Munchkin Man is not the world class stock trader and investor that he truly is.

Instead, just pretend.......

Only pretend................

That the Munchkin Man is a rank newbie when it comes to investing and trading in stocks.

The Munchkin Man has a question and would like to see some thoughtful replies.

So here goes:

Why do good companies have bad stocks?

Let the Munchkin Man give you an example.

Xechem International Inc (XKEM) is a company which, if the accounts the Munchkin Man has read are true, has done a good thing.

They have supposedly come up with a new treatment for sickle cell anemia.

Here are links to two press releases which describe the progress of this new treatment:

http://biz.yahoo.com/bw/060606/20060606005199.html?.v=1

http://biz.yahoo.com/bw/060705/20060705005761.html?.v=1

Apparently, both the FDA and NAFDAC think this may prove to be a promising treatment for sickle cell anemia.

The Munchkin Man did his own due diligence on this stock. One of the company's lead researchers is a professor from Virginia Commonwealth University.

The Munchkin Man checked this out for himself. This professor is legit.

Here is a company which has apparently come up with a new treatment for sickle cell anemia and which has enjoyed research assistance from at least one reputable university professor in the U.S.

So why has the share price for this stock gone back down into the crapper?

The Munchkin Man has heard a number of theories.

The Munchkin Man has heard that the company is a scam. The Munchkin Man has heard that they constantly dilute their shares.

Those are bad things.

So why does a company, one which has apparently done a good thing, allow bad things to happen to its stock?

The Munchkin Man would like to read your viewpoints on this issue.

For purposes of personal disclosure, the Munchkin Man is a former owner of this stock. The Munchkin Man was able to sell it for a profit, even as it began to fall.

But to be honest, the Munchkin Man was expecting its share price to have been at least $0.25 by now.

So this is one instance in which the Munchkin Man was wrong.

Any and all comments will be welcome and appreciated, even if you ridicule and put down the Munchkin Man.

Even the Munchkin Man is not too old to learn.

Thanks in advance.

Good luck to all.

Best Wishes,

Munchkin Man
 
glassman  - posted
share structure.....

On June 15, 2006, Xechem International, Inc. reached final agreement with Marjorie Chassman ("Chassman") regarding a bridge loan financing, whereby Chassman agrees to loan $1,025,000 to Xechem, in two tranches, one in the amount of $500,000 and the other in the amount of $525,000. The first tranche of $500,000 was infused on Friday, June 9, 2006. The second tranche of $525,000 is due by Friday, June 23, 2006. The note has been negotiated to convert into shares of our common stock at $0.015 per share (approximately 66,666,667 shares, excluding interest). The note bears interest at 8% and is due May 31, 2008. As additional consideration for infusion of the capital, Xechem will issue Chassman 66,666,667 warrants, exercisable at $0.02 per share for a period of 5 years. In addition, Chassman has agreed to extend the due date on all existing notes held by the Company to May 31, 2008. The loan has not been documented at this time. Upon documentation, it will be filed as an exhibit.

http://www.nasdaq.com/asp/quotes_sec.asp?mode=&kind=&symbol=STTC&symbol=XKEM&sym bol=&symbol=&symbol=&symbol=&symbol=&symbol=&symbol=&symbol=&FormType=&mkttype=& pathname=&page=filings&selected=XKEM
 
glassman  - posted
share structure:

STOCKHOLDERS' (DEFICIT)
Class A voting preferred stock,$ .00001 par value, 2,500 shares
authorized; 2,500 shares issued and outstanding --
Class B 8% convertible preferred stock,$ .00001 par value, 1,150 shares
authorized; none outstanding --
Class C preferred stock,$ .00001 par value, 49,996,350 shares authorized;
15,931 issued and outstanding --
Common stock,$.00001 par value 1,950,000,000 shares authorized;
880,643,686 issued and outstanding 9,000
Additional paid in capital 68,702,000
Deficit accumulated during development stage (73,072,000)


http://secfilings.nasdaq.com/filingFrameset.asp?FileName=0001144204%2D06%2D02183 0%2Etxt&FilePath=%5C2006%5C05%5C22%5C&CoName=XECHEM+INTERNATIONAL+INC&FormType=1 0QSB&RcvdDate=5%2F22%2F2006&pdf=
 
glassman  - posted
share structure...

Weighted average number of common shares outstanding - Basic a Diluted

THREE MONTHS ENDED
MARCH 31,
2006 658,136,687
====================

2005 259,668,718
====================



==================== ==========


Common stock,$.00001 par value 1,950,000,000 shares authorized;
880,643,686 issued and outstanding 9,000


200 million shares are missing?
 
T e x  - posted
"That the Munchkin Man is not the world class stock trader and investor that he truly is."

Tex says: "from the mouths of babes"

munchie?

sorry about all your "hurdles" in life. That many chemicals racing around in your brain must make it tough to even function, eh?

[ August 12, 2006, 22:17: Message edited by: T e x ]
 
10of13  - posted
Munchkin Man...

My theory? I have contacted many "support" organizations here in the states...trying to find if someone ever heard of the "drug" that XKEM has to offer...you know..if something is being tested or tried some where in the world..seems the support groups and what not for that disease would have at least "gotten wind" of the possiblity???

No one has heard of it? Why? Maybe "the drug" does excist..but it isn't doing what XKEM claims it does? I don't know...but with out the varification and the "gossip" going on within the SCD "community" I lost "faith" that this "drug" was doing what it was claimed to do...
 
T e x  - posted
"but with out the varification and the "gossip" going on within the SCD "community" I lost "faith" that this "drug" was doing what it was claimed to do..."

now, dadgummit?

that's a nice post....
 
metal1  - posted
strike 1 = Nigeria? cmon, nigeria is a joke.

strike 2 = they have no money like 99.9% of BB and pinksheets hence the previous posts about loans and the issuance of hundreds of millions of shares. anytime they want to do anything they have to issue more shares to pay for it. they are missing any current hype to offset the constant flood of shares

strike 3 = no strike 3 yet as they are still operating. according to them anyway
 
money 76  - posted
well just to speak about the product not effecting anyone is too early to say that.

they have the remedy . its matter of time a loan for them to meet the demand would bring this stock rocket high imo.

stock would go back up matter of time .
 
T e x  - posted
quote:
Originally posted by money 76:
well just to speak about the product not effecting anyone is too early to say that.

they have the remedy . its matter of time a loan for them to meet the demand would bring this stock rocket high imo.

stock would go back up matter of time .

really?

no chit? ... where/how/when that remedy proven?
 
money 76  - posted
quote:
Originally posted by T e x:
quote:
Originally posted by money 76:
well just to speak about the product not effecting anyone is too early to say that.

they have the remedy . its matter of time a loan for them to meet the demand would bring this stock rocket high imo.

stock would go back up matter of time .

really?

no chit? ... where/how/when that remedy proven?

lol u have a problem sort out a remedy for that first .lol hehe
 
Phoenix  - posted
quote:
Originally posted by money 76:
quote:
Originally posted by T e x:
quote:
Originally posted by money 76:
well just to speak about the product not effecting anyone is too early to say that.

they have the remedy . its matter of time a loan for them to meet the demand would bring this stock rocket high imo.

stock would go back up matter of time .

really?

no chit? ... where/how/when that remedy proven?

lol u have a problem sort out a remedy for that first .lol hehe
You should throw in a few more "lol", to up your credibility..

I think all anyone asks for is proof/links.

So, pony up.
 



Contact Us | Allstocks.com Message Board Home

© 1997 - 2021 Allstocks.com. All rights reserved.

Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classic™ 6.7.2

Share