Allstocks.com's Bulletin Board Post A Reply
my profile login | register | search | faq | forum home

» Allstocks.com's Bulletin Board » Micro Penny Stocks, Penny Stocks $0.10 & Under » anybody feel like bashing? new news 6:36am » Post A Reply

Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon: Icon 1     Icon 2     Icon 3     Icon 4     Icon 5     Icon 6     Icon 7    
Icon 8     Icon 9     Icon 10     Icon 11     Icon 12     Icon 13     Icon 14    
Message:

HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.

 

Instant Graemlins Instant UBB Code™
Smile   Frown   Embarrassed   Big Grin   Wink   Razz  
Cool   Roll Eyes   Mad   Eek!   Confused   BadOne  
Good Luck   More Crap   Wall Bang   Were Up   Were Down    
Insert URL Hyperlink - UBB Code™   Insert Email Address - UBB Code™
Bold - UBB Code™   Italics - UBB Code™
Quote - UBB Code™   Code Tag - UBB Code™
List Start - UBB Code™   List Item - UBB Code™
List End - UBB Code™   Image - UBB Code™

What is UBB Code™?
Options


Disable Graemlins in this post.


 


T O P I C     R E V I E W
sarkai  - posted

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Related Quotes
Sym. Price Chg.
QBID Trade
News 0.0018 0
Triangle Multi-Media: Frank Olsen Alerts Shareholders

February 26, 2004 06:03:00 (ET)


PALM SPRINGS, Calif., Feb 26, 2004 /PRNewswire-FirstCall via COMTEX/ -- It has come to our attention that some shareholders are posting negative, harmful and inaccurate information on financial websites. Mr. Olsen states, "Anyone posting false information regarding QBID and Triangle Multi-Media (QBID, Trade) will be subject to legal action within five (5) days of said posting. We have had to do this before as it is a serious detriment to our company and it's investors. There is no reason other shareholders should be victims of false information, gossip and rumors."


 

Purl Gurl  - posted
How about bashing Olson's news release?

It is clear to me Frank Olsen knows little
about civil law and is making an empty
meaningless threat.

For these circumstances, only written
statements which can be shown to constitute
liable can be litigated. Liable must be
shown to not be opinion, not to be an
innocent writing, not to be free of malice.

Finding a person writing via the internet
withing five days, this is extremely hard
and most unlikely. An intelligent lawyer,
and few are, would not touch circumstances
like this without good hard evidence, which
is repeated many times, and points to a
paper trail which can be factually traced.

Obtaining a court subpoena for ISP records
is quite challenging requiring a factual
basis which will convince a judge liable
has been committed long before consideration
of a trial.

If a person to be sued is outside California,
this adds great difficulty. If outside of
America, this becomes impossible.

Litigating against the wrong person, would
likely result in a counter-suit for damages.

Research, read and learn about civil law.
You will quickly realize Olson is blowing
smoke and displaying a lack of knowledge.

True bashing, true liable, is very wrong
and should be prosecuted through civil
action. It is equally wrong for a CEO
to release an idle threat.

This nature of his news release would lead
me to question if there is something really
wrong with this company.


Purl Gurl


 

PAUL  - posted
I may be wrong but, it seems it would be somewhat easy to create a false personality.

I can see it now....

Come to order please. This is the case of Qbid vs. SuperWorm. The charge is bashing stock. Is SuperWorm in the court? ....... SuperWorm? .... Is there anyone here representing SuperWorm in the court?

The clerk rises. "we sent proper notification to the last know e-mail address".

The angry judge. "Issue a bench warrent for one SuperWorm".


I DO NOT AGREE WITH BASHING, I HOPE IT STOPS.


PAUL (My real name) Therefore I am not free to bash.

------------------
But godliness with contentment is great gain.
For we brought nothing into this world, and it is certain we can carry nothing out.

[This message has been edited by PAUL (edited February 26, 2004).]
 

Purl Gurl  - posted
Concealing yourself via the internet is
extremely easy and it is extremely hard
to trace a person who does conceal himself.

Those matters are of no concern to me.

I know nothing about this company, am not
interested in this company and will not
become interested.

However, I am insulted by Olson because of
his attempt to intimidate investors by
threatening legal action against anyone
who discusses his company in negative way.

What Olson has accomplished is to convince
me there is something very wrong about his
company, without any knowledge on my part.
He has caused me to be suspicious.

He has displayed a lack of knowledge, he
has displayed a lack of consideration of
consequences and has displayed a lack of
professional skills. He has effectively
insulted every intelligent reader via his
attempt to silence and censor.


Purl Gurl
 

Purl Gurl  - posted
For those who have not keyed in on this,

"...some shareholders are posting negative...."

Give this statement by Olson some thought.
His statement tells quite the tale about
Olson and his quality of thinking.


Purl Gurl
 

glassman  - posted
It is possible that he DOES understand what is really happening here and is trying to utilize the same tactics that many of the Bashers and Pumpers are using---semantic games---i am not impressed with his statement either though--i continue to HOLD

[This message has been edited by glassman (edited February 26, 2004).]
 

Purl Gurl  - posted
Olson needs to hire a ghost writer.

"We are currently directing efforts against
a select few who appear to be engaging in
liable to manipulate share prices. Our
goal is to prosecute through civil action
to set an example and to exemplify our
aggressive stance against those who would
cause deliberate harm to our shareholders."


Purl Gurl

 

glassman  - posted
A ghost writer would be sleight of hand---we know this company has major share issues-it is also in the PR's- i read it clearly----the PR is also suspect for another reason ---if he wants to do a buyback--then a low PPS is beneficial--more shares bought back per dollar---once again, i hold long expecting this one to hurt --but I am an optimist by nature and I would like to see success here---not for my personal TV viewing pleasure but for the increase in FREE SPEECH
 
Malichi  - posted
Give 'em heck Purl !!!!! You're absolutely correct in what you stated. It's good to have members like you here. It restores my faith in traders and trading in the market.

 
moe7755  - posted
It sounds to me like Frank Olson is talking about PURL GURL.
 
Purl Gurl  - posted
Yes, Moe, I am the one engaging in liable
at risk of being sued for a lot of money.

My plan is to bash Qbid prices down to
zero cents per share whereupon I will
purchase five-hundred-million shares.

Once I have vested five-hundred-million
shares at a cost of zero dollars, I will
then manipulate prices of Qbid up to my
target sell price of one dollar per share.

This is a strategy as believable as is
your comment about me.


Purl Gurl
 

glassman  - posted
PG you ARE an absolute GEM--LOL
 
Purl Gurl  - posted
* her best Dr. Bones McCoy voice *

I'm not a Gem, I'm a doctor, Jim!


"I am the egg which sticks to your teflon pan."

- Kira
 




Contact Us | Allstocks.com Message Board Home

© 1997 - 2021 Allstocks.com. All rights reserved.

Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classic™ 6.7.2

Share