Post A Reply
Allstocks.com's Bulletin Board
Hot Stocks Free for All !
CSHD: The Never-ending Story
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by TimW: [QB] Heres something that may be of interest on Pacer. I hope theres not too many typos, i had to read and type from the PDF file. Document 30 8/21/2008 Comes now defendant-appellant (Movant) who hereby moves the court to convene as an Article III Court for this Case, No. 1:06-CV-2568-CC. Pursuant to Article III of the Constitution of the United States of America and the common law rights secured under that Third Article, I the Appellant, Rufus Paul Harris, do hereby request and require a lawful hearing before an Original Article III Constitutional Court and not an insular court in the matter of Case No. 1:06-CV-2568-CC in the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. The matter to which Appellant has standing before this court is absolutely and "Article III matter" involving the Bill of Rights and the Constitution. Appellant has been and continues to be injured by the decisions of the Plantiff, U.S. agencies, and by the Orders of the lower court. Thus this Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals has a duty to convene in this case an an "Article III" Court and not as an "Admiralty" or any other Court jurisdiction. Article III of the Constitution, which established the Supreme Court "and such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish"... in which case defendants have a right to a trial by a jury of their peers, a right to due process and equal protection and all the rights guaranteed by the Bill of Rights. Due to the violation of Constitutional Rights by the District Court actions, the Plantiffs actions, the involvement of International financial Instutitions, the Depository Trust Corporation (to a sum believed to be around 1 Billion USD through illegal market activities) and due to the lack of presecution or attention of these activities by the Plantiff (the governing United Stated Federal Regulator agency) an "Article III" Court under the Contituion should be convened because of the provisions that the Article III provides to protect the courts against influence by the other branches of government and any outside entity. Appellant herby requests and requires that justices or judges who exist or qualify under "Evans v. Gore, 253 US 245 (1920)" parameters to be Article III justices or judges be assigned to this case in order to convene a Article III original Jurisdiction court. If I, the Appelant, cannot be guaranteed an Article III hearing at the common law before this Court, I, a natural man, now announce and affirmed my right to such a hearing and request of this Court to ceritify that it, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, is not an Article III court. This 18th day of August, 2008. Rufus Paul Harris. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Allstocks.com Message Board Home
© 1997 - 2013 Allstocks.com. All rights reserved.